nopperl/arxiv-image-text · Datasets at Hugging Face

dedup-isc-ft-v107-score float64 0.32 1	uid stringlengths 32 32	text stringlengths 0 32.5k	paper_id stringlengths 1 14	original_image_filename stringlengths 5 222
0.46629	a1eb1f0e523a49659f39daed4a8fec21	U_p vs. drop rate for variable packet sizes.	2012.10219	uniform_2.jpg
0.435262	514d8176e14d411db7a1a4997d023f6e	(a) Measurement of the decay time of the subradiant tail (unit of Γ_0^-1 ) as a function of the saturation parameter s of the excitation laser. Black dashed line: single atom decay time. (b) Total number of counts recorded in the subradiant tail (normalized to maximum value) as a function of s, together with a fit by a function α s/(1+α s) (blue solid line). From the fit we extract a decay time τ=α Γ_0^-1, see text, which is shown as a solid blue line in (a). Black dashed line: single atom response obtained setting α =1 in the previous equation. Caption: Independent decay process of multiply-excited subradiant states (here exemplified with n_ exc=2). Singly-excited states decay independently at a rate given by decay rates of the single excitation subradiant eigenmodes.	2012.10222	fig3.jpg
0.472664	d3819010803242f6a23e1956186ecd84	Directionality of the emitted light pulse. Release of the subradiant excitation, observed with light collected axially (APD //) (bottom curves) and radially (APD⊥) (top curves). Experiment done with a linear polarization of the excitation light, either parallel (dotted lines) or perpendicular (dashed lines) to the cloud, and with a circular polarization in the presence of a 50 G magnetic field alligned along the excitation direction (solid lines).	2012.10222	fig4d.jpg
0.432096	25ba7bfbaaf941938b727a47f2e4a17f	Photon count decay with a linear polarization, no magnetic field and no optical pumping i.e. multi-level situation (blue). The same in the two-level case: 20G magnetic field, σ^- polarization and prior optical pumping (purple). The two traces have been normalized to the steady state, measurements for N≃ 4500 in the first trapping geometry (see appendix <ref>).	2012.10222	tracesVSOP.jpg
0.479741	a93398da1b5849bc98b3f9f0bb460e6d	Photon count traces acquired as a function of the excitation frequency. The experimental data have been acquired in the shallowest trapping geometry described in the main text with N ≃ 4500. The temporal traces have been divided by the number of pulses of light used, they thus represent the mean number of photons collected during one pulse of resonant light.	2012.10222	tracesVSfreq.jpg
0.449	9bf4c3c02b7c4d7f836cbf8461d75612	The transverse momentum spectra of (a) π^-, (b) π^+, (c) K^-, (d) K^+, (e) p̅, (f) p, (g) π^0, (h) ϕ→ K^+K^-, (i) η, and (j) J/ψ→ e^+e^- with (a)–(i) \|η\|<0.35 (or (j) \|y\|<0.35) in different centrality classes produced in d-Au collisions at 200 GeV. Different symbols represent different centrality classes measured by the PHENIX Collaboration <cit.>. Some of them are scaled by different factors marked in the panels. The curves are our fitted results by using Eqs. (3) for mesons and (5) for baryons.	2012.10228	fig2-c.jpg
0.442694	beaa7613d0ec460892807cf935432ac0	HWP Mueller matrix elements as a function of frequency in the normal incidence case (solid lines) and for an incidence angle ϑ_inc of 18 (dashed lines, virtually indistinguishable from solid lines) simulated using the transfer matrix method. The three HWP configurations described in Table <ref> are shown. A 31.4 HWP rotation angle offset is applied to the 3-layer BR3 model. The black dashed line represents the ideal HWP (T=-c=1, ρ=s=0 in Eq. (<ref>)). The grey hatched bands illustrate the two instrumental frequency bands used in this work.	2012.10437	MMelm_FIG2_bis.jpg
0.420958	3b13b20fb2bb41508e28e68cb44a84f6	Mueller matrix elements for the three HWP models described in Table <ref>, integrated over the instrumental frequency bands (: solid lines, 80110; : dashed lines, 135165) as a function of the HWP rotation angle. The dashed black lines represent the behaviour of the ideal HWP (T=-c=1, ρ=s=0 in Eq. (<ref>)). It can be seen that the BR3 configuration (orange lines) is out of phase with the other HWP configurations.	2012.10437	MMelm_integ_alpha.jpg
0.417342	c1d2998e17ab416fa5e61d066b50cb8b	Azimuthally averaged beam profiles (dBi units) for a representative detector of one of the 50 used in this analysis. Shown are the Stokes Q and U beam components. For this figure, we have defined the Stokes parameters with respect to the Ludwig-3 basis <cit.>. This basis is approximately Cartesian around the beam centre and has been aligned with the polarized element of the detector. As a result, the ±U profile quantifies the amount of non-aligned (or “cross-polar”) polarized sensitivity of the beam. It can be seen that \|U\| is subdominant close to the centre of the beam (see inset) while having a relatively large contribution at large opening angles.	2012.10437	det0000_90_profile_sl.jpg
0.495099	fc3e80e6a2fb4883bc5237fb2a4b17fc	Residual power spectra obtained by observing the CMB with the BR3 configurations presented in Table <ref> (including the rotation angle offset optimized for the CMB). The beams are Gaussian. We omit the BR1 and BR5 HWP configurations since their residuals fall below the limits on the vertical axis. The no-HWP case is also shown (orange curves).	2012.10437	dspec_BB_basicgauss.jpg
0.440029	ebe70beabb094158aff35876cff20a8c	Residual power spectra generated when the CMB is observed using the BR3 HWP with a rotation angle offset optimized for the Galactic dust model (solid curves) and vice versa (dashed curves).	2012.10437	dspec_BB_wrongphase.jpg
0.433024	418da2e21c914c508af159cb94e3623e	Residual power spectra for the different Galactic dust models in the 150 frequency band scanned using the BR3 HWP configuration. The solid lines use a value of the HWP angle offset that is tailored to each dust model (the median of the distributions shown in Fig. <ref>). The dashed colored lines use the median of the rotation angle offsets calculated for the case of an SED given by the combination of CMB and dust.	2012.10437	dspec_BR3_150_BB.jpg
0.477677	d54f1ae501434a4fa6c9aafc9ce98851	Distribution of optimal BR3 HWP rotation angle offset φ in the 95 (solid lines) and 150 (dashed lines) bands for the Galactic dust models based on their per-pixel spectral energy distribution at N_side=512. The distributions are given for the 40% sky mask used in our analysis. The abscissa is expressed as the difference between the rotation angle offset φ and the reference angle φ_d0 corresponding to a modified blackbody with T=20 and β=1.54 as in Table <ref>.	2012.10437	dust_angle.jpg
0.431852	c831b0a0449a4b498440a51cef6c113b	Power spectral densities (PSDs) corresponding to a typical two-hour segment of noiseless time-ordered data for a single detector. The curves labelled () correspond to scans over an I-only ((Q, U)-only) simulated CMB sky. The curves labelled include HWP modulation using the three-layer BR3 HWP configuration (to be discussed in Sec. <ref>) spinning at a frequency ν_α of 1. The curve labelled (Overlapping with but slightly different below ∼2) incorporates the same HWP modulation, but does not include the HWP systematic that is constant with HWP angle α, see Eq. (<ref>). The curves labelled do not include HWP modulation. The simulated data are recorded at a monochromatic frequency of 90 using a Gaussian beam with a FWHM of 32.2. Each curve is the average of ten PSDs corresponding to successive two-hour scans. The scan strategy is described in Sec. <ref>.	2012.10437	psd.jpg
0.455451	33ed29556b3545d7b1e509f7b7415aa5	Sketch of telescope model used for this study. Light coming in from the left interacts with an HWP before hitting the primary lens. Light from the primary lens then gets further focused by the secondary lens before hitting the focal plane (on the right). The edge pixel has a beam centroid of 14 relative to boresight (see ray-bundle emitted from top right corner).	2012.10437	silicon_f1p56_v5_crop2.jpg
0.549864	dca2bc8269f24db88bdb92be550c48d7	Example of the adversarial Gini impurity where samples can move in the range of the arrows. We want to move a number of samples from I over the threshold (line, center) to maximize the weighted average of Gini impurities. In this example we can move the single blue (filled) sample from RI into LI to maximize it.	2012.10438	adversarial_gini_example.jpg
0.393486	1931a947d6e74f5eb8a1a82711618f58	No attacker	2012.10438	attack_model_visualization0.jpg
0.42932	b83b82ed3c8a4ba3be1fffc92ae82782	(>, <)	2012.10438	attack_model_visualization1.jpg
0.432877	cb469d02caf54d8392d730c5c1eb7723	(0.5, 0.5)	2012.10438	attack_model_visualization2.jpg
0.469206	2e5fa2c6e23941679149b0859018f72b	(<>, (0.7, 0.3))	2012.10438	attack_model_visualization3.jpg
0.484831	f600c86005ef459288ecd4569d663aeb	Average accuracy scores over 14 datasets before and after adversarial attacks. All models fit accurate trees while TREANT and GROOT perform best in the adversarial setting.	2012.10438	average_scores.jpg
0.503907	f536530af769448ebb7853673b254643	Function that we attempt to maximize for different settings of L_0, L_1, R_0, R_1, I_0 and I_1, plotted against x and y. The maxima appear to be lines through the diagonals of the plots.	2012.10438	random_values.jpg
0.434915	e31bfa5dfe1840af8ea807031f4dfbf7	Runtimes in seconds on a logaritmic scale for fitting decision trees of depth 4. Natural trees use Scikit-learn's fast implementation, Chen et al. and GROOT ran up to a thousand times faster than TREANT.	2012.10438	runtimes.jpg
0.45303	a2ef66dbc17c42259ceb79bd8d843bdc	Mean-field theory for nonequilibrium structure: Prediction for the nonequilibrium direct correlation function c, defined in (<ref>), as a function of wavenumber k=\| k\|. (a) System of harmonic particles driven by active forces. The predicted curves for c (red) are compared with simulation results (blue). The equilibrium reference c_ eq measured numerically (black), which is used as an input for the mean-field prediction, is shown as a reference. The good agreement between predictions and simulations demonstrates that our mean-field theory captures well the deviation from equilibrium structure. In particular, it reproduces quantitatively the effective attraction at large wavelengths/small wavenumbers, which arises due to active forces. Parameters: ρ_0 = 1, A = 16, τ = 0.4, T=1. (b) System of Yukawa particles driven by active forces. The prediction at T_=3 is based on using the equilibrium reference c_ eq (black solid line), whereas that at T_=48 is based on using a reference c obtained from simulations at T_=27 (black dashed line). Again, there is good agreement between theory (red) and simulation (red) curves for both values of T_ A. Parameters: ρ_0 = 0.5, A = 50, κ=4.0, τ=0.33, T=1.	2012.10441	Fig1_cut_comb.jpg
0.447805	f86848120680432090b190b212ae4c2a	Connecting dissipation and structure. (a) Theory and simulation results, when displayed in parametric plot for the rate of the work ẇ and the structural observable Ĩ (see Eq. (<ref>)), lead to the linear relation ẇ = αĨ, where the slope α varies with the interaction strength A. For weak interactions (A=0.5), the slopes predicted by our mean-field theory (green), as described in the main text, and that measured numerically (blue) agree very well. For stronger interactions (A>0.5), our mean-field theory leads to predicted slopes (red) that are close to that of simulations (blue). Overall, these results demonstrate that the dissipation-structure relation is robust across different values of A, and that our mean-field prediction performs well in capturing such a relationship. Parameters: Harmonic potential, ρ_0=1, τ=1, T_<10, T=1. (b) The linear relation between ẇ and Ĩ, as measured numerically, holds up to values of the PÃ©clet number that are within 25% of that at which phase transition occurs. The insets show snapshots of the system at different values of . The black solid line is a guideline corresponding to ẇ=Ĩ. Parameters: WCA potential, ρ_0 =0.75, τ =0.33, T=1, and ≡ (σ/T) √(T_ A/τ) with σ=1.	2012.10441	Fig2_cut_comb.jpg
0.432994	da0c86dbc17f4d30a5ec3c6158be24f9	Inferring dissipation from static configurations. (a) The machine learning architecture consists of two layers. First, a convolutional layer, which performs the operation r_i * F ≡∑_j ≠ i F(\| r_i- r_j\|), where j runs over a set number of nearest neighbors. The function F is expressed in a basis of Gaussian functions with coefficients learned by the algorithm, see Sec. II in SI. The second layer then fully connects the convolutional layer ℐ_i≡ r_i * F to the rate of work ẇ through the weight u and bias b: u ∑_i ℐ_i +b = ẇ. (b-c) The machine is trained using configurations generated at even values of T_ A∈[0,12], and the values of ẇ are predicted at both odd and even values within this range. The agreement between predicted and exact values of ẇ is excellent. This demonstrates that the machine learning algorithm is able to learn dissipation from static snapshots, without any prior information about the underlying dynamics. (Insets) We compare the learned function F with (∇ U)^2 - T∇^2 U, showing that the algorithm reproduces the dissipation-structure relation given in Eq. (<ref>) without any prior knowledge of such a relationship. Parameters: (b) Harmonic potential, ρ_0 = 1, τ = 1, T=1, (c) Yukawa potential, ρ_0 = 0.5, τ = 1, T=1. Insets show representative snapshots at T_={0,10} (Harmonic), and T_={0,30} (Yukawa). As in the main text, we use ≡ (σ/T) √(T_ A/τ) with σ=1.	2012.10441	Fig3_cut_comb.jpg
0.500252	5d0d6535bef242599f682ee9d92819da	Mean field phase diagram of an interacting Luttinger semimetal (LSM) in the presence of on-site Hubbard (U) and nearest-neighbor ferromagnetic (J) interactions for a fixed J/U=1/4 [Eqs. (<ref>)-(<ref>)]. The noncoplanar A_2u and T_1u phases are separated by an intervening collinear T_2u magnetic order [Fig. <ref>]. Interaction couplings are dimensionless, obtained by taking X Λ(2 m_p)^3/2/(32 π^3) → X for X=U and J, where Λ is the ultraviolet momentum cutoff, m_p=m_1 m_2/√(m^2_1+m^2_2) and α=tan^-1(m_1/m_2) [Eq. (<ref>)]. A possible coexistence between adjacent phases can be realized above the dashed lines, which we estimate from mean field susceptibilities, that, however, can be renormalized due the presence of the primary dominant order <cit.>. Inset: Internal algebra among the components of three magnetic orders. Six vertices (center) of the hexagon are (is) occupied by the components of T_1u and T_2u (A_2u) magnetic orders [Eqs. (<ref>)-(<ref>)]. Mutually anticommuting matrix operators associated with them are connected by solid lines. When two order parameters mutually anticommute (even partially), coexistence between them gets energetically favored.	2012.10442	PhaseDiagram_MeanField_Modified.jpg
0.426158	dd5583d5c28c4551a3b4639fe1df1a28	Evolution of the plus polarization h_+ for a binary of two IMBHs of masses M_1=M_2 = 10^3 M_⊙ in the LION window (solid, black line). We consider two different eccentricities, one zero and the other e=0.2 at the beginning of the evolution. As the systems evolve, the loss of angular momentum circularises the eccentric case, which converges towards the circular one. The binaries are assumed to be at a distance of 1 Gpc. For LION, the circular- and eccentric cases yield SNR∼ 1855 and 1875, respectively, while for (advanced) LIGO the values are ∼ 3.7 for the circular case, and 3.8 for the eccentric one.	2012.10443	EccentricCase.jpg
0.417145	2b58d84dcd93444a8a827796394d4fb8	Evolution in frequency of the first harmonics (displayed in different colours) of two compact binaries in the approximation of Keplerian ellipses of <cit.>. We depict the characteristic, dimensionless amplitude as a function of the frequency in Hz. The initial dynamical parameters corresponding to the each source is summarised at the top, left corner of each panel (masses, initial semi-major axis and eccentricity and distance to the source D). From the left (lower frequencies) to the right (higher frequencies), we show the sensitivity curve of LISA <cit.>, then LION, starting at about 1 Hz, the Einstein Telescope <cit.>, and then LIGO. The upper, red harmonic corresponds to n=2 in Equation <ref>, which means that the source has circularised. We also show different moments in the evolution of the harmonics, and add the information relative to the source at that moment; in particular the remaining time until merger, the eccentricity and the periapsis distance R_ p in Schwarzschild radii R_ S. The left panel shows a binary of masses M_1=M_2=30 M_⊙ at a distance of 180 Gpc, which corresponds to a redshift of z=15.76. This is orders of magnitude distance further away than what LISA can hope to observe. The right panel shows the inspiral of a compact object of mass 1.4 M_⊙ (e.g. a neutron star) onto a stellar-mass black hole of mass 10 M_⊙ at a distance of 130 Gpc (z=11.80). Even at this cosmological distance, the source spends one second in the LION domain. We note that no other detector is in the position of resolving these sources.	2012.10443	FarSources.jpg
0.431532	c7f829d4c17842689ce5ecc403d9a654	Same as in Figure <ref> but for a binary of two intermediate-mass black holes (left panel) and an IMRI composed of an intermediate-mass black hole of mass M_ BH=3000 M_⊙ and a stellar-mass one of m_⋆=10 M_⊙ (right panel). In the latter we also include information about the initial periapsis distance R_ p^0, as well as the initial time for merger T_ pl.	2012.10443	IMBHs_IMRI.jpg
0.382092	8e9d8857543e49e3905f999fde267512	Contours of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of the total mass of the binary system M_ bin in solar masses and redshift (and cosmological time, in Gyrs). We remark how LION covers a region of phase-space which is totally inaccessible to both LISA and LIGO, as shown with particular examples in Figure <ref>.	2012.10443	Waterfalls.jpg
0.491756	cfc968a041f94eacbe87daa20bff879f	Comparison of the design sensitive of current and future gravitational wave detectors. Our proposed detector, LION, could extend the range of ground based detectors reducing the gap of measurable frequencies between Earth based and space-borne missions . LION has the highest sensitivity in the detection band from below 30 Hz and is the only detector able to with sufficient sensitivity for detection between 0.7 Hz and 2 Hz.	2012.10443	comparison.jpg
0.476564	33b9fc6641ae471b828bbf68d2349706	Evolution of four different signals with masses ranging between 10^7 M_⊙ and 50 M_⊙, different mass ratios q (in the legend we show the mass of the largest black hole) and the assumed redshift. We show three different observatories (LISA, LION and LIGO). The yellow, dash-dotted waveform corresponds to a system of 10^7 M_⊙ at a redsift z=10 with q=1; the orange, solid waveform to a binary of q=100 M_⊙, z=100 and q=18; the blue, dotted one to a system of 10^4 M_⊙, z=10^-2, q=18 and the green, dashed curve represents a binary of mass 50 M_⊙, z=0.1 and q=1.	2012.10443	detectors_and_sources.jpg
0.382162	c8a115d97a6449d2926f7a736f6a5199	Left panel: A binary of two IMBHs of masses 10^3 M_⊙ at a redshift z=1 for different spin values (see legend on the right) at three different moments, namely 200 years before the coalescence, at the detector's (typical) observation time T_ obs and 1 year before the coalescence. We display the sensitivity curve of LISA (blue, left one) and LION (orange, right one). Right panel: Evolution of the waveform for a binary of two black holes with q=18 and the mass of the heaviest one m_ bh=18 M_⊙, at a redshift z=0.1. As in the left panel, we pinpoint the same moments in the evolution, different spin configurations, the sensitivity curve of LION (orange, left one) and LIGO (red, right one).	2012.10443	hc_comparison.jpg
0.403112	5ab67e15b14946f6a91dee74a201cd71	Mosaique of SNR contour maps to show its dependency with the redshift (bottom panels), as in Figure <ref>), the mass ratio q ranging between the values that IMRPhenomD allows for (mid panels, see text) and the spin (top panels). We show LION on the left column and LIGO on the right one.	2012.10443	mosaique.jpg
0.53306	4f38564e68664858983aca68f941b83d	Noise budget for a gravitational wave detector operated on the Moon with an arm length of 40 km and optics with increased masses at a temperature of 70 K. The parameters used to create this are listed in Table <ref>. The detector is quantum noise limited above 2 Hz and limited by thermal noise below this until it hits the seismic cliff at 0.8 Hz. The bandwidth of the detector is therefore approximately from 0.7 Hz to the kHz. Simulated with gwinc <cit.>.	2012.10443	noisebudget.jpg
0.429937	d532f2f070c8498eaf2e6de1493527ef	Left: Normalized redshift distributions of the + parent sample (grey) and our density sample (black). Center and right: Distribution of our density sample (solid markers) in (center) offset from the star-forming MS and (right) offset from the <cit.> galaxy mass-size relation, both as a function of stellar mass, compared to the distribution of the parent no-outflow inactive (open black circles) and AGN + outflow (open grey squares) samples. Orange, red and blue markers indicate galaxies in the z∼ 0.9, z∼ 1.5 and z∼ 2.2 redshift slices, respectively.	2012.10445	k3d_galaxy_properties.jpg
0.430211	622d7d5f13164fd08de781dee30f92ae	ratio (top) and n_e() (bottom) as a function of μ_H_2 (a and e), (b and f), Σ_ baryon (c and g), and (d and h). The color-coding, symbols, and data representation are the same as in Figure <ref>.	2012.10445	ne_gas_stars_trends.jpg
0.473215	6a8851584bac408591359c57ca67ec51	Relationships between the thermal properties of the ionized gas – probed by (top) n_e(), (middle) (), and (bottom) n_e(rms) – and selected galaxy properties: a) n_H_2, b) , c) midplane pressure P_ mid, and which is proportional to the inverse of the predicted region stall radius. The n_e(rms) measurements have been corrected for DIG contamination as described in Section <ref>. Plotting symbols are the same as in Figure <ref>. Error bars on the x axis quantities indicate the 16th – 84th percentile range in galaxy properties within each stack. The blue and red dashed lines are the best fits obtained when the slope is i) fixed to unity and ii) left free, respectively. The shaded regions show the 1σ errors around the best fits, obtained by randomly perturbing each data point according to its errors and re-fitting 1000 times. When the blue and red lines match, the quantities on the x and y axes are consistent with having a 1:1 relationship (in log space) at all redshifts.	2012.10445	ne_scalings.jpg
0.427046	b212a88ae3254cc4b2b2f8a63abbc57c	ratio (top) and n_e() (bottom) as a function of sSFR (a and e), SFR (b and f), (c and g) and SFR/SFR_ MS(z) (d and h). The solid lines and shaded error regions represent the average properties of the SAMI (purple) and + (green) galaxies, computed in sliding bins as described in Section <ref>. The individual data points are measurements for literature samples of SFGs, introduced in Section <ref>. In the bottom panel, n_e() measurements (points with grey outlines) have been included to illustrate the consistency between measurements made using different tracers. The color-coding indicates the median redshift of each galaxy sample.	2012.10445	ne_sf_trends.jpg
0.45977	43ea6a2e46214cf099949d5bb07b7fd0	Redshift evolution of the rms electron density (left) and the volume filling factor of the line-emitting gas (right). Grey markers in the left-hand panel show the n_e() measurements for comparison. The plotting symbols are the same as in . Open and colored solid markers indicate values before and after correcting for the contribution of DIG to the emission, respectively. Error bars are omitted from the open markers for clarity. The formal errors on the n_e(rms) measurements are too small to be seen. The two dashed lines in the left-hand panel were obtained by simultaneously fitting the redshift evolution of n_e(rms) and n_e(), forcing both to have the same slope. The best-fit intercepts are offset by 1.6 dex.	2012.10445	rms_density_filling_factor.jpg
0.433204	0e89529994d9465db44760d33c04c8f6	Distribution of SAMI galaxies in the (left) M_- SFR and (right) M_-R_e planes. The red dashed line in the right-hand panel shows the z∼ 0 extrapolation of the <cit.> mass-size relation, which has been adjusted to the rest-frame central wavelength of the SDSS r band filter (λ≃ 6020 Å) using their Equation 1.	2012.10445	sami_galaxy_properties.jpg
0.462894	0d3ace0fac2b422baa2f26c99e8fb8fc	Stacked doublet profiles of galaxies with no evidence for outflows or AGN activity, in four redshift slices: , , , and z≲ 0.1. The grey shaded regions indicate the 1σ spread of the 600 bootstrap stacks generated for each redshift slice (described in Section <ref>). The green curves indicate the best-fit Gaussian profiles.	2012.10445	stacks.jpg
0.477448	80105c5973444ffcb62aea0c81ccade2	Parameter spaces related to synchronization between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A or ϕ_3B, which are, respectively, the phases of oscillator 3 when the light input is AB(l), A, and B. R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A)[R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B)] is a synchronization measurement between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A[ϕ_3B]. θ(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) [θ(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B)] is the mean angle between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A[ϕ_3B]. K_couple is the control parameter, l[7-l] is the number of days in the week that correspond to light input B[A] in the light input AB(l).	2012.10447	Rtheta1_lag8_new_names_all_automatic_newcolors.jpg
0.405299	e35fc5cd63aa4359990e6c968591ea15	Zoom of parameter spaces related to synchronization.	2012.10447	Rtheta1_lag8_zoom1_new_names_newcolors.jpg
0.435074	709abc461a1749abba6da4d9a00031e3	2D-projection of the basins of attraction for K_couple = 1.06 and l = 2.9. The black dots are the fixed points, the initial conditions in the black(white) region converge for the fixed point in the black(white) region. We choose a projection in which both fixed points s_0 and s_1 belong to the plan, the axis u is in the same direction of the vector s_1 - s_0, the axis v is perpendicular to u and is in the plan ϕ_1_ϕ_2	2012.10447	bacia512black.jpg
0.42082	7bc5993faced4c5ea870bc929f0a2060	Value that ϕ_3 assumes on the PoincarÃ© section in which we take values at each seven days, for l = 2.7 and l = 2.9 following the attractor. In yellow simulations with k_couple increasing and in purple decreasing.	2012.10447	biff2_newcolors.jpg
0.389689	5ce19699a0b64ee2b78d55fe63f9a209	The dotted cyan line corresponds to the output g3(ϕ_3) for the light input A, the dashed pink line to light for the light input B and the black continuous line for the light input AB(l=2.5). In each panel the value of the coupling parameter K_couple is indicated.	2012.10447	comparingfunctionsdirectly.jpg
0.41732	04a8d15f041a47b6b001126524edba4f	Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 6h	2012.10447	lag6h.jpg
0.453105	6398e101543e4f098e3cc8b6af490087	Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 7h	2012.10447	lag7h.jpg
0.437477	54b177b8160b45329e37a45156511140	Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 9h	2012.10447	lag9h.jpg
0.43962	15a30b44db4e454f9ee2232c1a80aafc	ϕ_3(7) Value which ϕ_3 assumes on the PoincarÃ© section in which we save values at each 7 days, abbreviation in figure R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) as R(ABA), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as R(ABB), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) as θ_1(ABA) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as θ_1(ABB).	2012.10447	lagged_days_2p7750_lag8_new_name_newcolors.jpg
0.547724	8a0c6abc37384c6f97fa88c6faccea6f	(a) Light input A - regular light input, 12 hours of light (-12 to 0) followed by 12 hours of dark (0 to 12). (b) Light input B 12 hours of light (-4 to 8) followed by 12 hours of dark (8 to -4), in other words, light input A with a delay of 8h (c) Light input AB(l = 2.5), light input A for 4.5 days followed by light input B for 2.5 days.	2012.10447	lightinput.jpg
0.423639	bc4c0703c3924eb7b4e92dc2c2fdaa17	Parameter space of the period for shift = 7h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.3].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.	2012.10447	period_lag7h.jpg
0.428598	3578c06ada4243b9a3c4a7530ac365a3	Parameter space of the period for shift = 9h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.3].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.	2012.10447	period_lag9h.jpg
0.476409	74957627361b4ad8b231271a93c4630b	Parameter space of the period. The white regions are the regions that the algorithm could not find a period, either because it is too high or because the solution is chaotic. The other periods are indicated in the legend next to the panels.	2012.10447	periodsT_newcolors.jpg
0.448769	374a9a44570945518ccb83a10a4e032b	Parameter space of the period for shift = 8h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.9].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.	2012.10447	preiod_results_expanded.jpg
0.459542	90195ba8d979402d8cf55e31cb13099b	Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 8h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.9].	2012.10447	results_expanded.jpg
0.439043	9076526c329c458aa4e91779b25989d4	simulation with five years of IceCube inelasticity measurements overlaid.	2012.10449	BjorkenY_vs_energy.jpg
0.470422	e96ff5d203c5412bb59c7c77fcca3820	A direction (orange) is chosen and a perpendicular disc of radius (red) is constructed.	2012.10449	LI_direction_choice.jpg
0.455049	7d4ad71cb7e540a29250cd0c0d1c5179	A point of closest approach is randomly sampled on that disk.	2012.10449	LI_direction_choice_pic_pt.jpg
0.430598	ceda4b2e27f54d1ca70e48203c66c6f1	If the actual column depth available is less than the column depth computed in part (c), reduce it appropriately.	2012.10449	LI_direction_cut.jpg
0.497116	1270601dac2b4235ba96f8b6cec0b57e	Preliminary column depth calculation of the lepton range (red) plus two s (blue)	2012.10449	LI_direction_max_mwe.jpg
0.448514	a160b1c000864bb2abf70be401ee4ba5	Sample uniformly from the total column depth available for insertion depth.	2012.10449	LI_direction_sam_mwe.jpg
0.42304	c4415a82cb8645c98007c34669d4f16d	Top: ⟨ y ⟩ as a function of E_ν, generated by and . Note that trend lines are directly superimposed. Bottom: the ratio of ⟨ y ⟩ from and .	2012.10449	NuGenLI_inelasticity.jpg
0.363804	f3037468a79c4d5d886d888a8055cb09	The density of the Earth model as a function of depth from the edge of Earth's atmosphere.	2012.10449	earth_density.jpg
0.461672	79d65b1d2bb34775962b02c019cc9627	A diagram illustrating the different event generation and weighting steps for traditional methods compared with the and philosophy.	2012.10449	nufsgen.jpg
0.53288	c30eeac5d74c40229bfac49e3b64bdb9	Top: injected lepton energy for an anti-neutrino events. Bottom: relative difference between and .	2012.10449	secondaryE_anti-matter.jpg
0.494942	386fb9f9f1e74cd199ec756425259242	Top: injected lepton energy for neutrino events. Bottom: relative difference between and .	2012.10449	secondaryE_matter.jpg
0.428033	a40aee3918e349188995098b8109fab4	Unweighted	2012.10449	totalE_unweighted.jpg
0.477694	4605792d22c3428c9c187a31978de668	E^-2 astrophysical flux convolved with DIS cross section	2012.10449	totalE_weighted.jpg
0.483091	728570e1805045c084f547e4b8291a9f	Atmospheric flux convolved with DIS cross section	2012.10449	totalE_weighted_atmo.jpg
0.471002	15e32eb19ea64f738bfdcaab7596b62f	atmospheric flux with additional NSI	2012.10449	totalE_weighted_bsm.jpg
0.420395	6e26a6111783442ea125d197b0744f1a	Relativistic zero-knowledge protocol for three-colourability on a short distance. Two separated provers try to convince a verifier that they know a given graph is three-colourable without facilitating the elaboration of a three-colouring. (a) A three-colourable graph with six vertices and ten edges. The three-colouring depicted here is such that c_1=c_3=0 (full blue), c_2=c_5=1 (dashed yellow), c_4=c_6=2 (dotted red); vertices linked by an edge are indeed of different colours. (b) Satellite view <cit.> of the building of the experiment. The distance between the two parties involved is 60, that is, 200 at the speed of light. This separation makes the communication between the two provers impossible at this time scale due to special relativity. The verifiers simultaneously trigger their questions to their provers by means of an optical fibre (dashed line). (c) Illustration of a round of the protocol on both verifier-prover pairs. Each verifier sends (downward arrow) an edge and a bit b to their prover, who should answer (upward arrow) their bth labellings at the end points of the edge: for all vertex k the provers have indeed pre-agreed on two labellings l_k^0,l_k^1∈{0,1,2} that should sum up to a three-colouring, namely, l_k^0+l_k^1≡ c_k3. When asking the same edge on both sides and opposite bits, the verifiers can check, thanks to the definition of the labellings, that the provers know that the graph is three-colourable. To make sure that the provers are not cheating the verifiers can also send the same bit with edges sharing (at least) one vertex; the consistency of the provers' answers can then be tested. By repeating this procedure many times the verifiers can make the probability for dishonest provers to pass the protocol arbitrarily small (soundness). However, even with all the provers' answers at hand, the verifiers are not more efficient at elaborating a three-colouring than initially (zero-knowledge).	2012.10452	fig1.jpg
0.472364	7d9edcfaa58e4464849680e1d017a8d5	Contours for the reheating temperature required to reproduce the observed DM abundance, for m_DM=1 MeV. The red-shaded region is in tension with LHC Run-II results from Refs. <cit.>. The gray-shaded region for which k > M_5 is beyond the EFT approach. The green-shaded region corresponds to lifetimes of the lighter KK-mode longer than 1 s.	2012.10453	Trh_all.jpg
0.493594	d57f70c21ad24fec910fa48a7f2d31b8	Direct freeze-in: contours for the reheating temperature required to reproduce the observed DM abundance, for m_DM=1 MeV. The red-shaded region is in tension with LHC results from Refs. <cit.>. The gray-shaded region for which k > M_5 is beyond the EFT approach. The green-shaded region corresponds to lifetimes of KK-modes longer than 1 s.	2012.10453	Trh_ann.jpg
0.42384	bfb7c95a2880402b8ac0cc53bb7bd920	The black solid line represents the DM annihilation cross-section in the CW/LD scenario for k=10^7 GeV, Λ_ eff=10^9 GeV (that corresponds to M_5 = 1.35721 × 10^8 GeV) and m_DM=1 MeV. The red-dashed line represents the same process in the RS scenario, for m_1 = 10^7 GeV, Λ = 10^9 and m_DM=1 MeV. The gray- and red-shaded regions on the right of the picture represent the region of the parameter space that is beyond the EFT approach, as s is larger than the scale of the effective theory (M_5 and Λ in the case of the CW/LD or the RS scenarios, respectively).	2012.10453	crossRSCW.jpg
0.457119	eac7ac7ee4ce4a69b4e28423242cb1b6	Upper and lower bounds on CFT correlators 𝒢(w):=𝒢(w,w) of a field of dimension , shown for the case =Δ_σ^∼ 0.518. Here 𝒢^B,F stand for the Bosonic/Fermionic generalized free field correlators, 𝒢^B,F(w)=± 1+w^-2+(1-w)^-2. Any unitary CFT correlator must live inside the shaded region, with the caveat that the upper bound is only valid for correlators where the first operator has scaling dimension Δ_g≥ 2. In red the 3d Ising spin field correlator computed from the CFT data provided in <cit.>.	2012.10454	IsingBound.jpg
0.454139	1571faedadde4bfbb1d8f8a73f65308c	Comparison between the 3d Ising spin field correlator and its approximation as a sum of two Polyakov blocks. The results are normalized relative to the generalized free fermion correlator 𝒢^F(w). The line is the correlator as computed from the conformal block expansion up to dimension 10, plotted in the interval w∈(0,1/2) which is then mirrored to get a crossing symmetric shape. This is not necessary for the Polyakov block approximation which is automatically crossing symmetric and shown as the red dots.	2012.10454	isingapprox1.jpg
0.445506	5af474a8490043cb8e85bb3fe6e0ae80	Comparison between the 3d Ising spin field correlator and its approximations. The results are normalized relative to the generalized free fermion correlator 𝒢^F(w). The blue line (the lowest) is the correlator as computed from the conformal block expansion up to dimension 10. The red dots represent the two Polyakov block approximation of section <ref>. The green line is the identity interacting Polyakov block described in the text, computed from its conformal block expansion.	2012.10454	isingapprox2.jpg
0.383803	86589a93bf2e4728ad619cd27a2be1f7	Scattering between domains separated by a yz DW as shown in Fig. <ref>. The magnetizations in the two domains are chosen to be ± M ẑ, for which we schematically illustrate the momentum space picture of Fermi surfaces in the left and right domains in (a). These Fermi surfaces surround the Weyl points which are separated along the k_z-direction due to having the magnetizations in the z-direction. Contours depict Fermi surface slices at a fixed k_z which are used in panels (b) and (c). (b)-(c) Schematic illustrations of the transmission coefficients T's and reflection coefficients R's, which connect eigenstates of ℋ(,_L, R), for left-incident scattering states (panel (b)) and right-incident scattering states (panel (c)) at the Fermi energy and for a fixed k_z.	2012.10457	Fig1_combined.jpg
0.471402	8e735fd1342d42849b6cee80349c1194	(a) Reflection coefficient and (b) transmission coefficient for left-incident scattering states as a function of their labels _∥, featuring a pronounced skewness between any pair of state with the same k_z and opposite k_y. This implies that a pair of incident Bloch waves moving opposite to each other in the y-direction get transmitted asymmetrically at the DW, as illustrated in (c). This results in a transverse Hall current in the presence of a bias voltage between the two domains.	2012.10457	Fig2_new_2.jpg
0.442068	f414b780294145728a2fe3be7f1c6398	(a) Longitudinal conductance per unit cross section area g_xx (b) Hall conductance per unit cross section area g_yx and (c) their ratio g_yx/g_xx as function of the energy shift Δ.	2012.10457	Fig3_antisymmetrized.jpg
0.411733	603ac1f6f52d4ab6aba9b552374e9f7b	Thin film with two magnetic domains, having uniform magnetizations (𝐌_L, 𝐌_R), separated by a yz DW.	2012.10457	MagneticDomain.jpg
0.421193	c94653f1cf704c549240d0d82875ad2a	Reflection and transmission coefficients obtained from the lattice model and the quadratic model, featuring their qualitative agreement in terms of their asymmetry in k_y.	2012.10457	appC.jpg
0.428071	4fab9abb44c54643b5949ae84916504f	Transmission coefficient at E_F = 5t, far away from the Weyl points and for Δ = 0.1t and M_L = M_R = 1. The transmission coefficients are orders of magnitude small than those where E_F lies near Weyl points.	2012.10457	away_wp.jpg
0.40763	6b9fd17135ac4f2f93b0d3c0da1b2e26	(a) Band structure for M = 1 where k_x and k_y have been set to zero. There are two Weyl points at zero energy and at k_z ≈± 1.1 a_0^-1. (b) Fermi energy E_F dependence of σ_xy exhibiting a plateau-like behaviour, enclosed by the dashed lines, in the Weyl metal regime where the Fermi surface consists of two disjointed closed surfaces surrounding the Weyl points, and the dispersions are approximately linear.	2012.10457	band.jpg
0.472827	c6ea5c00b8404c92915bf85f96d6fda8	The dependence of the volume-averaged bulk Hall resistivity ρ_yx^Bulk from Eq.<ref>, on the volume fraction r_± of the magnetic domains 𝐌_± = ± M ẑ, with r_++r_-= 1. The displayed result corresponds to M= 1, Δ= 0.1t and E_F = 0.4t.	2012.10457	dw_estimate.jpg
0.414132	63affab933b749a88e852d98ba22bc74	Energy shift Δ dependence of the Hall conductivity obtained from Kubo formula in the presence of a DW. As discussed in the text, σ_yx here can be regarded as purely the DW scattering contribution, which are significant and can be of the same order of magnitude as the uniform Hall conductivity 0.35e^2/ha_0 in Fig.<ref>(b).	2012.10457	kubo_antisymmetrized.jpg
0.47592	6923a34425c74e0c89fa57d9af521836	(a) Longitudinal conductance per unit cross section area g_xx and (b) Hall conductance per unit cross section area g_yx as a function of the in-plane tilting angle θ. (c) Reflection coefficients and (d) transmission coefficients corresponding to the negative θ where the magnitude of g_yx is the largest.	2012.10457	tilting_antisymmetrized.jpg
0.372484	ec5d88243d5241278af75534e46b28d2	Four point exchange Witten diagram for Yang-Mills theory.	2012.10460	4pt6.jpg
0.381684	73117b0869b24c789a6d1f4922f86972	Light-curve for the /FPMA (circles) and (stars) observations of binned to 128 s. The grey dashed line indicates the average count rate for both and . The time elapsed is from the start of the observation on 2020-04-19 at 07:12:55UT. The source exhibits ≲10% variability over the course of the observation. Only one FPM is shown for clarity.	2012.10461	4U1543_lightcurve.jpg
0.517151	43180516d83f494d8ca7b71e8c704a56	A comparison of the observations of during the 2017 outburst (black circles) reported in <cit.> to the observations obtained in 2020 (blue stars) for: a) the soft color versus the source intensity in the 0.5-6.8 keV band, b) the hard color versus intensity, and c) the soft color versus the hard color. The new observations probe different regions on these planes.	2012.10461	Intensity_intervals_comparison.jpg
0.462917	4d878c1387c941cb8b2b41a2624e6512	Best-fit reflection model reported in Table <ref> at 1.02 (solid line) and contrasting 100 (dashed line) overlaid on the NICER data to highlight the broad O line component. The larger inner disk radius relaxes the relativistic effects to show the local rest-frame emission. The O8 Lyman α and β components can be seen when relativistic effects are removed. For clarity, the data were rebinned.	2012.10461	OVIII.jpg
0.463821	f2943b15e9c64d2da6bc00ef4bb167c2	Comparison of the 0.4-9 keV counts spectra for the observations reported here (blue) and the observations from 2017 intervals A (light grey) and E (dark grey) from <cit.>. The source is at a lower flux in 2020 in comparison to the previous observations.	2012.10461	nicer_2017_2020_speccomp.jpg
0.439723	3513d0ee4adc460d831e3ac7cdfba74e	The unfolded spectrum with model components for the (blue) and (FPMA: black, FPMB: red) data for the reflection modeling reported in Table <ref>. The dashed line indicates the single-temperature blackbody, the dot-dashed line is the power-law component, the solid line is the reflection component from .	2012.10461	xillverCO_eeufdelc_chur_10272020_v2.jpg
0.393533	2e933f1874334026bec78a18e3ec326a	ALMA and NaCo gallery of all observed targets. ALMA images (left panels) are from the DSHARP survey, NaCo images (right panels) are the results from the Classical ADI reduction. White (grey) dashed lines mark the bright rings (dark gaps) of each disk, as derived by <cit.>. Point-like sources are marked by a white arrow when recovered after the ADI reduction. A 10 AU scalebar is shown in the lower left corner of each cADI panel, the beam size of the ALMA images is shown in the lower left corner of each ALMA panel. In the case of HT Lup, variation of the parallactic angle was too low for proper cADI processing. The result from the PCA processing is presented instead.	2012.10464	NACO_ALMA_comparison_sample_binary_final_2.jpg
0.402004	25a952d6fd9f42a783acdcf778aa9bb3	Cut of our MESS Detection probabilities at the possible planet locations considered by <cit.>. Red vertical lines mark the highest mass needed for a planet to produce the observed gaps in the disk, as predicted by the hydrodynamical models.	2012.10464	detection_proba_hydro_eccen.jpg
0.448735	811ff1625b8f47d5b3da553cfcb96f36	Cut of our MESS Detection probabilities at the possible planet locations obtained by <cit.>. Red shaded intervals correspond to the mass range 1M_J - 3M_J. In the three cases, planets location is consistent with the radius of one of the disk gaps.	2012.10464	detection_proba_kinematic_eccen.jpg
0.542205	48c08bdd9a0544d496890c025cdd5c19	Comparison of the two different epochs of observation of Elias 24, using the PCA method. The same color scale is used for both observations. The signal of the possible companion was not recovered again during the second epoch, which was reduced using the RDI method.	2012.10464	elias24_epochs_fitted.jpg

0.46629

a1eb1f0e523a49659f39daed4a8fec21

U_p vs. drop rate for variable packet sizes.

2012.10219

uniform_2.jpg

0.435262

514d8176e14d411db7a1a4997d023f6e

(a) Measurement of the decay time of the subradiant tail (unit of Γ_0^-1 ) as a function of the saturation parameter s of the excitation laser. Black dashed line: single atom decay time. (b) Total number of counts recorded in the subradiant tail (normalized to maximum value) as a function of s, together with a fit by a function α s/(1+α s) (blue solid line). From the fit we extract a decay time τ=α Γ_0^-1, see text, which is shown as a solid blue line in (a). Black dashed line: single atom response obtained setting α =1 in the previous equation. Caption: Independent decay process of multiply-excited subradiant states (here exemplified with n_ exc=2). Singly-excited states decay independently at a rate given by decay rates of the single excitation subradiant eigenmodes.

2012.10222

fig3.jpg

0.472664

d3819010803242f6a23e1956186ecd84

Directionality of the emitted light pulse. Release of the subradiant excitation, observed with light collected axially (APD //) (bottom curves) and radially (APD⊥) (top curves). Experiment done with a linear polarization of the excitation light, either parallel (dotted lines) or perpendicular (dashed lines) to the cloud, and with a circular polarization in the presence of a 50 G magnetic field alligned along the excitation direction (solid lines).

2012.10222

fig4d.jpg

0.432096

25ba7bfbaaf941938b727a47f2e4a17f

Photon count decay with a linear polarization, no magnetic field and no optical pumping i.e. multi-level situation (blue). The same in the two-level case: 20G magnetic field, σ^- polarization and prior optical pumping (purple). The two traces have been normalized to the steady state, measurements for N≃ 4500 in the first trapping geometry (see appendix <ref>).

2012.10222

tracesVSOP.jpg

0.479741

a93398da1b5849bc98b3f9f0bb460e6d

Photon count traces acquired as a function of the excitation frequency. The experimental data have been acquired in the shallowest trapping geometry described in the main text with N ≃ 4500. The temporal traces have been divided by the number of pulses of light used, they thus represent the mean number of photons collected during one pulse of resonant light.

2012.10222

tracesVSfreq.jpg

0.449

9bf4c3c02b7c4d7f836cbf8461d75612

The transverse momentum spectra of (a) π^-, (b) π^+, (c) K^-, (d) K^+, (e) p̅, (f) p, (g) π^0, (h) ϕ→ K^+K^-, (i) η, and (j) J/ψ→ e^+e^- with (a)–(i) |η|<0.35 (or (j) |y|<0.35) in different centrality classes produced in d-Au collisions at 200 GeV. Different symbols represent different centrality classes measured by the PHENIX Collaboration <cit.>. Some of them are scaled by different factors marked in the panels. The curves are our fitted results by using Eqs. (3) for mesons and (5) for baryons.

2012.10228

fig2-c.jpg

0.442694

beaa7613d0ec460892807cf935432ac0

HWP Mueller matrix elements as a function of frequency in the normal incidence case (solid lines) and for an incidence angle ϑ_inc of 18 (dashed lines, virtually indistinguishable from solid lines) simulated using the transfer matrix method. The three HWP configurations described in Table <ref> are shown. A 31.4 HWP rotation angle offset is applied to the 3-layer BR3 model. The black dashed line represents the ideal HWP (T=-c=1, ρ=s=0 in Eq. (<ref>)). The grey hatched bands illustrate the two instrumental frequency bands used in this work.

2012.10437

MMelm_FIG2_bis.jpg

0.420958

3b13b20fb2bb41508e28e68cb44a84f6

Mueller matrix elements for the three HWP models described in Table <ref>, integrated over the instrumental frequency bands (: solid lines, 80110; : dashed lines, 135165) as a function of the HWP rotation angle. The dashed black lines represent the behaviour of the ideal HWP (T=-c=1, ρ=s=0 in Eq. (<ref>)). It can be seen that the BR3 configuration (orange lines) is out of phase with the other HWP configurations.

2012.10437

MMelm_integ_alpha.jpg

0.417342

c1d2998e17ab416fa5e61d066b50cb8b

Azimuthally averaged beam profiles (dBi units) for a representative detector of one of the 50 used in this analysis. Shown are the Stokes Q and U beam components. For this figure, we have defined the Stokes parameters with respect to the Ludwig-3 basis <cit.>. This basis is approximately Cartesian around the beam centre and has been aligned with the polarized element of the detector. As a result, the ±U profile quantifies the amount of non-aligned (or “cross-polar”) polarized sensitivity of the beam. It can be seen that |U| is subdominant close to the centre of the beam (see inset) while having a relatively large contribution at large opening angles.

2012.10437

det0000_90_profile_sl.jpg

0.495099

fc3e80e6a2fb4883bc5237fb2a4b17fc

Residual power spectra obtained by observing the CMB with the BR3 configurations presented in Table <ref> (including the rotation angle offset optimized for the CMB). The beams are Gaussian. We omit the BR1 and BR5 HWP configurations since their residuals fall below the limits on the vertical axis. The no-HWP case is also shown (orange curves).

2012.10437

dspec_BB_basicgauss.jpg

0.440029

ebe70beabb094158aff35876cff20a8c

Residual power spectra generated when the CMB is observed using the BR3 HWP with a rotation angle offset optimized for the Galactic dust model (solid curves) and vice versa (dashed curves).

2012.10437

dspec_BB_wrongphase.jpg

0.433024

418da2e21c914c508af159cb94e3623e

Residual power spectra for the different Galactic dust models in the 150 frequency band scanned using the BR3 HWP configuration. The solid lines use a value of the HWP angle offset that is tailored to each dust model (the median of the distributions shown in Fig. <ref>). The dashed colored lines use the median of the rotation angle offsets calculated for the case of an SED given by the combination of CMB and dust.

2012.10437

dspec_BR3_150_BB.jpg

0.477677

d54f1ae501434a4fa6c9aafc9ce98851

Distribution of optimal BR3 HWP rotation angle offset φ in the 95 (solid lines) and 150 (dashed lines) bands for the Galactic dust models based on their per-pixel spectral energy distribution at N_side=512. The distributions are given for the 40% sky mask used in our analysis. The abscissa is expressed as the difference between the rotation angle offset φ and the reference angle φ_d0 corresponding to a modified blackbody with T=20 and β=1.54 as in Table <ref>.

2012.10437

dust_angle.jpg

0.431852

c831b0a0449a4b498440a51cef6c113b

Power spectral densities (PSDs) corresponding to a typical two-hour segment of noiseless time-ordered data for a single detector. The curves labelled () correspond to scans over an I-only ((Q, U)-only) simulated CMB sky. The curves labelled include HWP modulation using the three-layer BR3 HWP configuration (to be discussed in Sec. <ref>) spinning at a frequency ν_α of 1. The curve labelled (Overlapping with but slightly different below ∼2) incorporates the same HWP modulation, but does not include the HWP systematic that is constant with HWP angle α, see Eq. (<ref>). The curves labelled do not include HWP modulation. The simulated data are recorded at a monochromatic frequency of 90 using a Gaussian beam with a FWHM of 32.2. Each curve is the average of ten PSDs corresponding to successive two-hour scans. The scan strategy is described in Sec. <ref>.

2012.10437

psd.jpg

0.455451

33ed29556b3545d7b1e509f7b7415aa5

Sketch of telescope model used for this study. Light coming in from the left interacts with an HWP before hitting the primary lens. Light from the primary lens then gets further focused by the secondary lens before hitting the focal plane (on the right). The edge pixel has a beam centroid of 14 relative to boresight (see ray-bundle emitted from top right corner).

2012.10437

silicon_f1p56_v5_crop2.jpg

0.549864

dca2bc8269f24db88bdb92be550c48d7

Example of the adversarial Gini impurity where samples can move in the range of the arrows. We want to move a number of samples from I over the threshold (line, center) to maximize the weighted average of Gini impurities. In this example we can move the single blue (filled) sample from RI into LI to maximize it.

2012.10438

adversarial_gini_example.jpg

0.393486

1931a947d6e74f5eb8a1a82711618f58

No attacker

2012.10438

attack_model_visualization0.jpg

0.42932

b83b82ed3c8a4ba3be1fffc92ae82782

(>, <)

2012.10438

attack_model_visualization1.jpg

0.432877

cb469d02caf54d8392d730c5c1eb7723

(0.5, 0.5)

2012.10438

attack_model_visualization2.jpg

0.469206

2e5fa2c6e23941679149b0859018f72b

(<>, (0.7, 0.3))

2012.10438

attack_model_visualization3.jpg

0.484831

f600c86005ef459288ecd4569d663aeb

Average accuracy scores over 14 datasets before and after adversarial attacks. All models fit accurate trees while TREANT and GROOT perform best in the adversarial setting.

2012.10438

average_scores.jpg

0.503907

f536530af769448ebb7853673b254643

Function that we attempt to maximize for different settings of L_0, L_1, R_0, R_1, I_0 and I_1, plotted against x and y. The maxima appear to be lines through the diagonals of the plots.

2012.10438

random_values.jpg

0.434915

e31bfa5dfe1840af8ea807031f4dfbf7

Runtimes in seconds on a logaritmic scale for fitting decision trees of depth 4. Natural trees use Scikit-learn's fast implementation, Chen et al. and GROOT ran up to a thousand times faster than TREANT.

2012.10438

runtimes.jpg

0.45303

a2ef66dbc17c42259ceb79bd8d843bdc

Mean-field theory for nonequilibrium structure: Prediction for the nonequilibrium direct correlation function c, defined in (<ref>), as a function of wavenumber k=| k|. (a) System of harmonic particles driven by active forces. The predicted curves for c (red) are compared with simulation results (blue). The equilibrium reference c_ eq measured numerically (black), which is used as an input for the mean-field prediction, is shown as a reference. The good agreement between predictions and simulations demonstrates that our mean-field theory captures well the deviation from equilibrium structure. In particular, it reproduces quantitatively the effective attraction at large wavelengths/small wavenumbers, which arises due to active forces. Parameters: ρ_0 = 1, A = 16, τ = 0.4, T=1. (b) System of Yukawa particles driven by active forces. The prediction at T_=3 is based on using the equilibrium reference c_ eq (black solid line), whereas that at T_=48 is based on using a reference c obtained from simulations at T_=27 (black dashed line). Again, there is good agreement between theory (red) and simulation (red) curves for both values of T_ A. Parameters: ρ_0 = 0.5, A = 50, κ=4.0, τ=0.33, T=1.

2012.10441

Fig1_cut_comb.jpg

0.447805

f86848120680432090b190b212ae4c2a

Connecting dissipation and structure. (a) Theory and simulation results, when displayed in parametric plot for the rate of the work ẇ and the structural observable Ĩ (see Eq. (<ref>)), lead to the linear relation ẇ = αĨ, where the slope α varies with the interaction strength A. For weak interactions (A=0.5), the slopes predicted by our mean-field theory (green), as described in the main text, and that measured numerically (blue) agree very well. For stronger interactions (A>0.5), our mean-field theory leads to predicted slopes (red) that are close to that of simulations (blue). Overall, these results demonstrate that the dissipation-structure relation is robust across different values of A, and that our mean-field prediction performs well in capturing such a relationship. Parameters: Harmonic potential, ρ_0=1, τ=1, T_<10, T=1. (b) The linear relation between ẇ and Ĩ, as measured numerically, holds up to values of the PÃ©clet number that are within 25% of that at which phase transition occurs. The insets show snapshots of the system at different values of . The black solid line is a guideline corresponding to ẇ=Ĩ. Parameters: WCA potential, ρ_0 =0.75, τ =0.33, T=1, and ≡ (σ/T) √(T_ A/τ) with σ=1.

2012.10441

Fig2_cut_comb.jpg

0.432994

da0c86dbc17f4d30a5ec3c6158be24f9

Inferring dissipation from static configurations. (a) The machine learning architecture consists of two layers. First, a convolutional layer, which performs the operation r_i * F ≡∑_j ≠ i F(| r_i- r_j|), where j runs over a set number of nearest neighbors. The function F is expressed in a basis of Gaussian functions with coefficients learned by the algorithm, see Sec. II in SI. The second layer then fully connects the convolutional layer ℐ_i≡ r_i * F to the rate of work ẇ through the weight u and bias b: u ∑_i ℐ_i +b = ẇ. (b-c) The machine is trained using configurations generated at even values of T_ A∈[0,12], and the values of ẇ are predicted at both odd and even values within this range. The agreement between predicted and exact values of ẇ is excellent. This demonstrates that the machine learning algorithm is able to learn dissipation from static snapshots, without any prior information about the underlying dynamics. (Insets) We compare the learned function F with (∇ U)^2 - T∇^2 U, showing that the algorithm reproduces the dissipation-structure relation given in Eq. (<ref>) without any prior knowledge of such a relationship. Parameters: (b) Harmonic potential, ρ_0 = 1, τ = 1, T=1, (c) Yukawa potential, ρ_0 = 0.5, τ = 1, T=1. Insets show representative snapshots at T_={0,10} (Harmonic), and T_={0,30} (Yukawa). As in the main text, we use ≡ (σ/T) √(T_ A/τ) with σ=1.

2012.10441

Fig3_cut_comb.jpg

0.500252

5d0d6535bef242599f682ee9d92819da

Mean field phase diagram of an interacting Luttinger semimetal (LSM) in the presence of on-site Hubbard (U) and nearest-neighbor ferromagnetic (J) interactions for a fixed J/U=1/4 [Eqs. (<ref>)-(<ref>)]. The noncoplanar A_2u and T_1u phases are separated by an intervening collinear T_2u magnetic order [Fig. <ref>]. Interaction couplings are dimensionless, obtained by taking X Λ(2 m_p)^3/2/(32 π^3) → X for X=U and J, where Λ is the ultraviolet momentum cutoff, m_p=m_1 m_2/√(m^2_1+m^2_2) and α=tan^-1(m_1/m_2) [Eq. (<ref>)]. A possible coexistence between adjacent phases can be realized above the dashed lines, which we estimate from mean field susceptibilities, that, however, can be renormalized due the presence of the primary dominant order <cit.>. Inset: Internal algebra among the components of three magnetic orders. Six vertices (center) of the hexagon are (is) occupied by the components of T_1u and T_2u (A_2u) magnetic orders [Eqs. (<ref>)-(<ref>)]. Mutually anticommuting matrix operators associated with them are connected by solid lines. When two order parameters mutually anticommute (even partially), coexistence between them gets energetically favored.

2012.10442

PhaseDiagram_MeanField_Modified.jpg

0.426158

dd5583d5c28c4551a3b4639fe1df1a28

Evolution of the plus polarization h_+ for a binary of two IMBHs of masses M_1=M_2 = 10^3 M_⊙ in the LION window (solid, black line). We consider two different eccentricities, one zero and the other e=0.2 at the beginning of the evolution. As the systems evolve, the loss of angular momentum circularises the eccentric case, which converges towards the circular one. The binaries are assumed to be at a distance of 1 Gpc. For LION, the circular- and eccentric cases yield SNR∼ 1855 and 1875, respectively, while for (advanced) LIGO the values are ∼ 3.7 for the circular case, and 3.8 for the eccentric one.

2012.10443

EccentricCase.jpg

0.417145

2b58d84dcd93444a8a827796394d4fb8

Evolution in frequency of the first harmonics (displayed in different colours) of two compact binaries in the approximation of Keplerian ellipses of <cit.>. We depict the characteristic, dimensionless amplitude as a function of the frequency in Hz. The initial dynamical parameters corresponding to the each source is summarised at the top, left corner of each panel (masses, initial semi-major axis and eccentricity and distance to the source D). From the left (lower frequencies) to the right (higher frequencies), we show the sensitivity curve of LISA <cit.>, then LION, starting at about 1 Hz, the Einstein Telescope <cit.>, and then LIGO. The upper, red harmonic corresponds to n=2 in Equation <ref>, which means that the source has circularised. We also show different moments in the evolution of the harmonics, and add the information relative to the source at that moment; in particular the remaining time until merger, the eccentricity and the periapsis distance R_ p in Schwarzschild radii R_ S. The left panel shows a binary of masses M_1=M_2=30 M_⊙ at a distance of 180 Gpc, which corresponds to a redshift of z=15.76. This is orders of magnitude distance further away than what LISA can hope to observe. The right panel shows the inspiral of a compact object of mass 1.4 M_⊙ (e.g. a neutron star) onto a stellar-mass black hole of mass 10 M_⊙ at a distance of 130 Gpc (z=11.80). Even at this cosmological distance, the source spends one second in the LION domain. We note that no other detector is in the position of resolving these sources.

2012.10443

FarSources.jpg

0.431532

c7f829d4c17842689ce5ecc403d9a654

Same as in Figure <ref> but for a binary of two intermediate-mass black holes (left panel) and an IMRI composed of an intermediate-mass black hole of mass M_ BH=3000 M_⊙ and a stellar-mass one of m_⋆=10 M_⊙ (right panel). In the latter we also include information about the initial periapsis distance R_ p^0, as well as the initial time for merger T_ pl.

2012.10443

IMBHs_IMRI.jpg

0.382092

8e9d8857543e49e3905f999fde267512

Contours of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of the total mass of the binary system M_ bin in solar masses and redshift (and cosmological time, in Gyrs). We remark how LION covers a region of phase-space which is totally inaccessible to both LISA and LIGO, as shown with particular examples in Figure <ref>.

2012.10443

Waterfalls.jpg

0.491756

cfc968a041f94eacbe87daa20bff879f

Comparison of the design sensitive of current and future gravitational wave detectors. Our proposed detector, LION, could extend the range of ground based detectors reducing the gap of measurable frequencies between Earth based and space-borne missions . LION has the highest sensitivity in the detection band from below 30 Hz and is the only detector able to with sufficient sensitivity for detection between 0.7 Hz and 2 Hz.

2012.10443

comparison.jpg

0.476564

33b9fc6641ae471b828bbf68d2349706

Evolution of four different signals with masses ranging between 10^7 M_⊙ and 50 M_⊙, different mass ratios q (in the legend we show the mass of the largest black hole) and the assumed redshift. We show three different observatories (LISA, LION and LIGO). The yellow, dash-dotted waveform corresponds to a system of 10^7 M_⊙ at a redsift z=10 with q=1; the orange, solid waveform to a binary of q=100 M_⊙, z=100 and q=18; the blue, dotted one to a system of 10^4 M_⊙, z=10^-2, q=18 and the green, dashed curve represents a binary of mass 50 M_⊙, z=0.1 and q=1.

2012.10443

detectors_and_sources.jpg

0.382162

c8a115d97a6449d2926f7a736f6a5199

Left panel: A binary of two IMBHs of masses 10^3 M_⊙ at a redshift z=1 for different spin values (see legend on the right) at three different moments, namely 200 years before the coalescence, at the detector's (typical) observation time T_ obs and 1 year before the coalescence. We display the sensitivity curve of LISA (blue, left one) and LION (orange, right one). Right panel: Evolution of the waveform for a binary of two black holes with q=18 and the mass of the heaviest one m_ bh=18 M_⊙, at a redshift z=0.1. As in the left panel, we pinpoint the same moments in the evolution, different spin configurations, the sensitivity curve of LION (orange, left one) and LIGO (red, right one).

2012.10443

hc_comparison.jpg

0.403112

5ab67e15b14946f6a91dee74a201cd71

Mosaique of SNR contour maps to show its dependency with the redshift (bottom panels), as in Figure <ref>), the mass ratio q ranging between the values that IMRPhenomD allows for (mid panels, see text) and the spin (top panels). We show LION on the left column and LIGO on the right one.

2012.10443

mosaique.jpg

0.53306

4f38564e68664858983aca68f941b83d

Noise budget for a gravitational wave detector operated on the Moon with an arm length of 40 km and optics with increased masses at a temperature of 70 K. The parameters used to create this are listed in Table <ref>. The detector is quantum noise limited above 2 Hz and limited by thermal noise below this until it hits the seismic cliff at 0.8 Hz. The bandwidth of the detector is therefore approximately from 0.7 Hz to the kHz. Simulated with gwinc <cit.>.

2012.10443

noisebudget.jpg

0.429937

d532f2f070c8498eaf2e6de1493527ef

Left: Normalized redshift distributions of the + parent sample (grey) and our density sample (black). Center and right: Distribution of our density sample (solid markers) in (center) offset from the star-forming MS and (right) offset from the <cit.> galaxy mass-size relation, both as a function of stellar mass, compared to the distribution of the parent no-outflow inactive (open black circles) and AGN + outflow (open grey squares) samples. Orange, red and blue markers indicate galaxies in the z∼ 0.9, z∼ 1.5 and z∼ 2.2 redshift slices, respectively.

2012.10445

k3d_galaxy_properties.jpg

0.430211

622d7d5f13164fd08de781dee30f92ae

ratio (top) and n_e() (bottom) as a function of μ_H_2 (a and e), (b and f), Σ_ baryon (c and g), and (d and h). The color-coding, symbols, and data representation are the same as in Figure <ref>.

2012.10445

ne_gas_stars_trends.jpg

0.473215

6a8851584bac408591359c57ca67ec51

Relationships between the thermal properties of the ionized gas – probed by (top) n_e(), (middle) (), and (bottom) n_e(rms) – and selected galaxy properties: a) n_H_2, b) , c) midplane pressure P_ mid, and which is proportional to the inverse of the predicted region stall radius. The n_e(rms) measurements have been corrected for DIG contamination as described in Section <ref>. Plotting symbols are the same as in Figure <ref>. Error bars on the x axis quantities indicate the 16th – 84th percentile range in galaxy properties within each stack. The blue and red dashed lines are the best fits obtained when the slope is i) fixed to unity and ii) left free, respectively. The shaded regions show the 1σ errors around the best fits, obtained by randomly perturbing each data point according to its errors and re-fitting 1000 times. When the blue and red lines match, the quantities on the x and y axes are consistent with having a 1:1 relationship (in log space) at all redshifts.

2012.10445

ne_scalings.jpg

0.427046

b212a88ae3254cc4b2b2f8a63abbc57c

ratio (top) and n_e() (bottom) as a function of sSFR (a and e), SFR (b and f), (c and g) and SFR/SFR_ MS(z) (d and h). The solid lines and shaded error regions represent the average properties of the SAMI (purple) and + (green) galaxies, computed in sliding bins as described in Section <ref>. The individual data points are measurements for literature samples of SFGs, introduced in Section <ref>. In the bottom panel, n_e() measurements (points with grey outlines) have been included to illustrate the consistency between measurements made using different tracers. The color-coding indicates the median redshift of each galaxy sample.

2012.10445

ne_sf_trends.jpg

0.45977

43ea6a2e46214cf099949d5bb07b7fd0

Redshift evolution of the rms electron density (left) and the volume filling factor of the line-emitting gas (right). Grey markers in the left-hand panel show the n_e() measurements for comparison. The plotting symbols are the same as in . Open and colored solid markers indicate values before and after correcting for the contribution of DIG to the emission, respectively. Error bars are omitted from the open markers for clarity. The formal errors on the n_e(rms) measurements are too small to be seen. The two dashed lines in the left-hand panel were obtained by simultaneously fitting the redshift evolution of n_e(rms) and n_e(), forcing both to have the same slope. The best-fit intercepts are offset by 1.6 dex.

2012.10445

rms_density_filling_factor.jpg

0.433204

0e89529994d9465db44760d33c04c8f6

Distribution of SAMI galaxies in the (left) M_*- SFR and (right) M_*-R_e planes. The red dashed line in the right-hand panel shows the z∼ 0 extrapolation of the <cit.> mass-size relation, which has been adjusted to the rest-frame central wavelength of the SDSS r band filter (λ≃ 6020 Å) using their Equation 1.

2012.10445

sami_galaxy_properties.jpg

0.462894

0d3ace0fac2b422baa2f26c99e8fb8fc

Stacked doublet profiles of galaxies with no evidence for outflows or AGN activity, in four redshift slices: , , , and z≲ 0.1. The grey shaded regions indicate the 1σ spread of the 600 bootstrap stacks generated for each redshift slice (described in Section <ref>). The green curves indicate the best-fit Gaussian profiles.

2012.10445

stacks.jpg

0.477448

80105c5973444ffcb62aea0c81ccade2

Parameter spaces related to synchronization between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A or ϕ_3B, which are, respectively, the phases of oscillator 3 when the light input is AB(l), A, and B. R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A)[R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B)] is a synchronization measurement between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A[ϕ_3B]. θ(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) [θ(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B)] is the mean angle between ϕ_3AB(l) and ϕ_3A[ϕ_3B]. K_couple is the control parameter, l[7-l] is the number of days in the week that correspond to light input B[A] in the light input AB(l).

2012.10447

Rtheta1_lag8_new_names_all_automatic_newcolors.jpg

0.405299

e35fc5cd63aa4359990e6c968591ea15

Zoom of parameter spaces related to synchronization.

2012.10447

Rtheta1_lag8_zoom1_new_names_newcolors.jpg

0.435074

709abc461a1749abba6da4d9a00031e3

2D-projection of the basins of attraction for K_couple = 1.06 and l = 2.9. The black dots are the fixed points, the initial conditions in the black(white) region converge for the fixed point in the black(white) region. We choose a projection in which both fixed points s_0 and s_1 belong to the plan, the axis u is in the same direction of the vector s_1 - s_0, the axis v is perpendicular to u and is in the plan ϕ_1_ϕ_2

2012.10447

bacia512black.jpg

0.42082

7bc5993faced4c5ea870bc929f0a2060

Value that ϕ_3 assumes on the PoincarÃ© section in which we take values at each seven days, for l = 2.7 and l = 2.9 following the attractor. In yellow simulations with k_couple increasing and in purple decreasing.

2012.10447

biff2_newcolors.jpg

0.389689

5ce19699a0b64ee2b78d55fe63f9a209

The dotted cyan line corresponds to the output g3(ϕ_3) for the light input A, the dashed pink line to light for the light input B and the black continuous line for the light input AB(l=2.5). In each panel the value of the coupling parameter K_couple is indicated.

2012.10447

comparingfunctionsdirectly.jpg

0.41732

04a8d15f041a47b6b001126524edba4f

Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 6h

2012.10447

lag6h.jpg

0.453105

6398e101543e4f098e3cc8b6af490087

Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 7h

2012.10447

lag7h.jpg

0.437477

54b177b8160b45329e37a45156511140

Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 9h

2012.10447

lag9h.jpg

0.43962

15a30b44db4e454f9ee2232c1a80aafc

ϕ_3(7) Value which ϕ_3 assumes on the PoincarÃ© section in which we save values at each 7 days, abbreviation in figure R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) as R(ABA), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as R(ABB), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) as θ_1(ABA) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as θ_1(ABB).

2012.10447

lagged_days_2p7750_lag8_new_name_newcolors.jpg

0.547724

8a0c6abc37384c6f97fa88c6faccea6f

(a) Light input A - regular light input, 12 hours of light (-12 to 0) followed by 12 hours of dark (0 to 12). (b) Light input B 12 hours of light (-4 to 8) followed by 12 hours of dark (8 to -4), in other words, light input A with a delay of 8h (c) Light input AB(l = 2.5), light input A for 4.5 days followed by light input B for 2.5 days.

2012.10447

lightinput.jpg

0.423639

bc4c0703c3924eb7b4e92dc2c2fdaa17

Parameter space of the period for shift = 7h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.3].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.

2012.10447

period_lag7h.jpg

0.428598

3578c06ada4243b9a3c4a7530ac365a3

Parameter space of the period for shift = 9h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.3].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.

2012.10447

period_lag9h.jpg

0.476409

74957627361b4ad8b231271a93c4630b

Parameter space of the period. The white regions are the regions that the algorithm could not find a period, either because it is too high or because the solution is chaotic. The other periods are indicated in the legend next to the panels.

2012.10447

periodsT_newcolors.jpg

0.448769

374a9a44570945518ccb83a10a4e032b

Parameter space of the period for shift = 8h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.9].. The white areas represent aperiodic solutions. The other periods are indicated in the scale next to the panels.

2012.10447

preiod_results_expanded.jpg

0.459542

90195ba8d979402d8cf55e31cb13099b

Color representations of R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A), R(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B), θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3A) and θ_1(ϕ_3AB(l),ϕ_3B) as a function of l and K_couple for shift = 8h, and K_couple∈ [0.6,1.9].

2012.10447

results_expanded.jpg

0.439043

9076526c329c458aa4e91779b25989d4

simulation with five years of IceCube inelasticity measurements overlaid.

2012.10449

BjorkenY_vs_energy.jpg

0.470422

e96ff5d203c5412bb59c7c77fcca3820

A direction (orange) is chosen and a perpendicular disc of radius (red) is constructed.

2012.10449

LI_direction_choice.jpg

0.455049

7d4ad71cb7e540a29250cd0c0d1c5179

A point of closest approach is randomly sampled on that disk.

2012.10449

LI_direction_choice_pic_pt.jpg

0.430598

ceda4b2e27f54d1ca70e48203c66c6f1

If the actual column depth available is less than the column depth computed in part (c), reduce it appropriately.

2012.10449

LI_direction_cut.jpg

0.497116

1270601dac2b4235ba96f8b6cec0b57e

Preliminary column depth calculation of the lepton range (red) plus two s (blue)

2012.10449

LI_direction_max_mwe.jpg

0.448514

a160b1c000864bb2abf70be401ee4ba5

Sample uniformly from the total column depth available for insertion depth.

2012.10449

LI_direction_sam_mwe.jpg

0.42304

c4415a82cb8645c98007c34669d4f16d

Top: ⟨ y ⟩ as a function of E_ν, generated by and . Note that trend lines are directly superimposed. Bottom: the ratio of ⟨ y ⟩ from and .

2012.10449

NuGenLI_inelasticity.jpg

0.363804

f3037468a79c4d5d886d888a8055cb09

The density of the Earth model as a function of depth from the edge of Earth's atmosphere.

2012.10449

earth_density.jpg

0.461672

79d65b1d2bb34775962b02c019cc9627

A diagram illustrating the different event generation and weighting steps for traditional methods compared with the and philosophy.

2012.10449

nufsgen.jpg

0.53288

c30eeac5d74c40229bfac49e3b64bdb9

Top: injected lepton energy for an anti-neutrino events. Bottom: relative difference between and .

2012.10449

secondaryE_anti-matter.jpg

0.494942

386fb9f9f1e74cd199ec756425259242

Top: injected lepton energy for neutrino events. Bottom: relative difference between and .

2012.10449

secondaryE_matter.jpg

0.428033

a40aee3918e349188995098b8109fab4

Unweighted

2012.10449

totalE_unweighted.jpg

0.477694

4605792d22c3428c9c187a31978de668

E^-2 astrophysical flux convolved with DIS cross section

2012.10449

totalE_weighted.jpg

0.483091

728570e1805045c084f547e4b8291a9f

Atmospheric flux convolved with DIS cross section

2012.10449

totalE_weighted_atmo.jpg

0.471002

15e32eb19ea64f738bfdcaab7596b62f

atmospheric flux with additional NSI

2012.10449

totalE_weighted_bsm.jpg

0.420395

6e26a6111783442ea125d197b0744f1a

Relativistic zero-knowledge protocol for three-colourability on a short distance. Two separated provers try to convince a verifier that they know a given graph is three-colourable without facilitating the elaboration of a three-colouring. (a) A three-colourable graph with six vertices and ten edges. The three-colouring depicted here is such that c_1=c_3=0 (full blue), c_2=c_5=1 (dashed yellow), c_4=c_6=2 (dotted red); vertices linked by an edge are indeed of different colours. (b) Satellite view <cit.> of the building of the experiment. The distance between the two parties involved is 60, that is, 200 at the speed of light. This separation makes the communication between the two provers impossible at this time scale due to special relativity. The verifiers simultaneously trigger their questions to their provers by means of an optical fibre (dashed line). (c) Illustration of a round of the protocol on both verifier-prover pairs. Each verifier sends (downward arrow) an edge and a bit b to their prover, who should answer (upward arrow) their bth labellings at the end points of the edge: for all vertex k the provers have indeed pre-agreed on two labellings l_k^0,l_k^1∈{0,1,2} that should sum up to a three-colouring, namely, l_k^0+l_k^1≡ c_k3. When asking the same edge on both sides and opposite bits, the verifiers can check, thanks to the definition of the labellings, that the provers know that the graph is three-colourable. To make sure that the provers are not cheating the verifiers can also send the same bit with edges sharing (at least) one vertex; the consistency of the provers' answers can then be tested. By repeating this procedure many times the verifiers can make the probability for dishonest provers to pass the protocol arbitrarily small (soundness). However, even with all the provers' answers at hand, the verifiers are not more efficient at elaborating a three-colouring than initially (zero-knowledge).

2012.10452

fig1.jpg

0.472364

7d9edcfaa58e4464849680e1d017a8d5

Contours for the reheating temperature required to reproduce the observed DM abundance, for m_DM=1 MeV. The red-shaded region is in tension with LHC Run-II results from Refs. <cit.>. The gray-shaded region for which k > M_5 is beyond the EFT approach. The green-shaded region corresponds to lifetimes of the lighter KK-mode longer than 1 s.

2012.10453

Trh_all.jpg

0.493594

d57f70c21ad24fec910fa48a7f2d31b8

Direct freeze-in: contours for the reheating temperature required to reproduce the observed DM abundance, for m_DM=1 MeV. The red-shaded region is in tension with LHC results from Refs. <cit.>. The gray-shaded region for which k > M_5 is beyond the EFT approach. The green-shaded region corresponds to lifetimes of KK-modes longer than 1 s.

2012.10453

Trh_ann.jpg

0.42384

bfb7c95a2880402b8ac0cc53bb7bd920

The black solid line represents the DM annihilation cross-section in the CW/LD scenario for k=10^7 GeV, Λ_ eff=10^9 GeV (that corresponds to M_5 = 1.35721 × 10^8 GeV) and m_DM=1 MeV. The red-dashed line represents the same process in the RS scenario, for m_1 = 10^7 GeV, Λ = 10^9 and m_DM=1 MeV. The gray- and red-shaded regions on the right of the picture represent the region of the parameter space that is beyond the EFT approach, as s is larger than the scale of the effective theory (M_5 and Λ in the case of the CW/LD or the RS scenarios, respectively).

2012.10453

crossRSCW.jpg

0.457119

eac7ac7ee4ce4a69b4e28423242cb1b6

Upper and lower bounds on CFT correlators 𝒢(w):=𝒢(w,w) of a field of dimension , shown for the case =Δ_σ^∼ 0.518. Here 𝒢^B,F stand for the Bosonic/Fermionic generalized free field correlators, 𝒢^B,F(w)=± 1+w^-2+(1-w)^-2. Any unitary CFT correlator must live inside the shaded region, with the caveat that the upper bound is only valid for correlators where the first operator has scaling dimension Δ_g≥ 2. In red the 3d Ising spin field correlator computed from the CFT data provided in <cit.>.

2012.10454

IsingBound.jpg

0.454139

1571faedadde4bfbb1d8f8a73f65308c

Comparison between the 3d Ising spin field correlator and its approximation as a sum of two Polyakov blocks. The results are normalized relative to the generalized free fermion correlator 𝒢^F(w). The line is the correlator as computed from the conformal block expansion up to dimension 10, plotted in the interval w∈(0,1/2) which is then mirrored to get a crossing symmetric shape. This is not necessary for the Polyakov block approximation which is automatically crossing symmetric and shown as the red dots.

2012.10454

isingapprox1.jpg

0.445506

5af474a8490043cb8e85bb3fe6e0ae80

Comparison between the 3d Ising spin field correlator and its approximations. The results are normalized relative to the generalized free fermion correlator 𝒢^F(w). The blue line (the lowest) is the correlator as computed from the conformal block expansion up to dimension 10. The red dots represent the two Polyakov block approximation of section <ref>. The green line is the identity interacting Polyakov block described in the text, computed from its conformal block expansion.

2012.10454

isingapprox2.jpg

0.383803

86589a93bf2e4728ad619cd27a2be1f7

Scattering between domains separated by a yz DW as shown in Fig. <ref>. The magnetizations in the two domains are chosen to be ± M ẑ, for which we schematically illustrate the momentum space picture of Fermi surfaces in the left and right domains in (a). These Fermi surfaces surround the Weyl points which are separated along the k_z-direction due to having the magnetizations in the z-direction. Contours depict Fermi surface slices at a fixed k_z which are used in panels (b) and (c). (b)-(c) Schematic illustrations of the transmission coefficients T's and reflection coefficients R's, which connect eigenstates of ℋ(,_L, R), for left-incident scattering states (panel (b)) and right-incident scattering states (panel (c)) at the Fermi energy and for a fixed k_z.

2012.10457

Fig1_combined.jpg

0.471402

8e735fd1342d42849b6cee80349c1194

(a) Reflection coefficient and (b) transmission coefficient for left-incident scattering states as a function of their labels _∥, featuring a pronounced skewness between any pair of state with the same k_z and opposite k_y. This implies that a pair of incident Bloch waves moving opposite to each other in the y-direction get transmitted asymmetrically at the DW, as illustrated in (c). This results in a transverse Hall current in the presence of a bias voltage between the two domains.

2012.10457

Fig2_new_2.jpg

0.442068

f414b780294145728a2fe3be7f1c6398

(a) Longitudinal conductance per unit cross section area g_xx (b) Hall conductance per unit cross section area g_yx and (c) their ratio g_yx/g_xx as function of the energy shift Δ.

2012.10457

Fig3_antisymmetrized.jpg

0.411733

603ac1f6f52d4ab6aba9b552374e9f7b

Thin film with two magnetic domains, having uniform magnetizations (𝐌_L, 𝐌_R), separated by a yz DW.

2012.10457

MagneticDomain.jpg

0.421193

c94653f1cf704c549240d0d82875ad2a

Reflection and transmission coefficients obtained from the lattice model and the quadratic model, featuring their qualitative agreement in terms of their asymmetry in k_y.

2012.10457

appC.jpg

0.428071

4fab9abb44c54643b5949ae84916504f

Transmission coefficient at E_F = 5t, far away from the Weyl points and for Δ = 0.1t and M_L = M_R = 1. The transmission coefficients are orders of magnitude small than those where E_F lies near Weyl points.

2012.10457

away_wp.jpg

0.40763

6b9fd17135ac4f2f93b0d3c0da1b2e26

(a) Band structure for M = 1 where k_x and k_y have been set to zero. There are two Weyl points at zero energy and at k_z ≈± 1.1 a_0^-1. (b) Fermi energy E_F dependence of σ_xy exhibiting a plateau-like behaviour, enclosed by the dashed lines, in the Weyl metal regime where the Fermi surface consists of two disjointed closed surfaces surrounding the Weyl points, and the dispersions are approximately linear.

2012.10457

band.jpg

0.472827

c6ea5c00b8404c92915bf85f96d6fda8

The dependence of the volume-averaged bulk Hall resistivity ρ_yx^Bulk from Eq.<ref>, on the volume fraction r_± of the magnetic domains 𝐌_± = ± M ẑ, with r_++r_-= 1. The displayed result corresponds to M= 1, Δ= 0.1t and E_F = 0.4t.

2012.10457

dw_estimate.jpg

0.414132

63affab933b749a88e852d98ba22bc74

Energy shift Δ dependence of the Hall conductivity obtained from Kubo formula in the presence of a DW. As discussed in the text, σ_yx here can be regarded as purely the DW scattering contribution, which are significant and can be of the same order of magnitude as the uniform Hall conductivity 0.35e^2/ha_0 in Fig.<ref>(b).

2012.10457

kubo_antisymmetrized.jpg

0.47592

6923a34425c74e0c89fa57d9af521836

(a) Longitudinal conductance per unit cross section area g_xx and (b) Hall conductance per unit cross section area g_yx as a function of the in-plane tilting angle θ. (c) Reflection coefficients and (d) transmission coefficients corresponding to the negative θ where the magnitude of g_yx is the largest.

2012.10457

tilting_antisymmetrized.jpg

0.372484

ec5d88243d5241278af75534e46b28d2

Four point exchange Witten diagram for Yang-Mills theory.

2012.10460

4pt6.jpg

0.381684

73117b0869b24c789a6d1f4922f86972

Light-curve for the /FPMA (circles) and (stars) observations of binned to 128 s. The grey dashed line indicates the average count rate for both and . The time elapsed is from the start of the observation on 2020-04-19 at 07:12:55UT. The source exhibits ≲10% variability over the course of the observation. Only one FPM is shown for clarity.

2012.10461

4U1543_lightcurve.jpg

0.517151

43180516d83f494d8ca7b71e8c704a56

A comparison of the observations of during the 2017 outburst (black circles) reported in <cit.> to the observations obtained in 2020 (blue stars) for: a) the soft color versus the source intensity in the 0.5-6.8 keV band, b) the hard color versus intensity, and c) the soft color versus the hard color. The new observations probe different regions on these planes.

2012.10461

Intensity_intervals_comparison.jpg

0.462917

4d878c1387c941cb8b2b41a2624e6512

Best-fit reflection model reported in Table <ref> at 1.02 (solid line) and contrasting 100 (dashed line) overlaid on the NICER data to highlight the broad O line component. The larger inner disk radius relaxes the relativistic effects to show the local rest-frame emission. The O8 Lyman α and β components can be seen when relativistic effects are removed. For clarity, the data were rebinned.

2012.10461

OVIII.jpg

0.463821

f2943b15e9c64d2da6bc00ef4bb167c2

Comparison of the 0.4-9 keV counts spectra for the observations reported here (blue) and the observations from 2017 intervals A (light grey) and E (dark grey) from <cit.>. The source is at a lower flux in 2020 in comparison to the previous observations.

2012.10461

nicer_2017_2020_speccomp.jpg

0.439723

3513d0ee4adc460d831e3ac7cdfba74e

The unfolded spectrum with model components for the (blue) and (FPMA: black, FPMB: red) data for the reflection modeling reported in Table <ref>. The dashed line indicates the single-temperature blackbody, the dot-dashed line is the power-law component, the solid line is the reflection component from .

2012.10461

xillverCO_eeufdelc_chur_10272020_v2.jpg

0.393533

2e933f1874334026bec78a18e3ec326a

ALMA and NaCo gallery of all observed targets. ALMA images (left panels) are from the DSHARP survey, NaCo images (right panels) are the results from the Classical ADI reduction. White (grey) dashed lines mark the bright rings (dark gaps) of each disk, as derived by <cit.>. Point-like sources are marked by a white arrow when recovered after the ADI reduction. A 10 AU scalebar is shown in the lower left corner of each cADI panel, the beam size of the ALMA images is shown in the lower left corner of each ALMA panel. In the case of HT Lup, variation of the parallactic angle was too low for proper cADI processing. The result from the PCA processing is presented instead.

2012.10464

NACO_ALMA_comparison_sample_binary_final_2.jpg

0.402004

25a952d6fd9f42a783acdcf778aa9bb3

Cut of our MESS Detection probabilities at the possible planet locations considered by <cit.>. Red vertical lines mark the highest mass needed for a planet to produce the observed gaps in the disk, as predicted by the hydrodynamical models.

2012.10464

detection_proba_hydro_eccen.jpg

0.448735

811ff1625b8f47d5b3da553cfcb96f36

Cut of our MESS Detection probabilities at the possible planet locations obtained by <cit.>. Red shaded intervals correspond to the mass range 1M_J - 3M_J. In the three cases, planets location is consistent with the radius of one of the disk gaps.

2012.10464

detection_proba_kinematic_eccen.jpg

0.542205

48c08bdd9a0544d496890c025cdd5c19

Comparison of the two different epochs of observation of Elias 24, using the PCA method. The same color scale is used for both observations. The signal of the possible companion was not recovered again during the second epoch, which was reduced using the RDI method.

2012.10464

elias24_epochs_fitted.jpg