dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.454454
c9e34f624b8f4dba9f95f02a09546119
The pipeline of the proposed algorithm framework.
2012.13320
framework.jpg
0.434431
8579c721d8af467f8f66bc65e22b4edb
Illustration of the mantis hexapod robot model. (a) top view, (b) close view of a single leg, (c) schematic diagram of the hexapod robot model, (d) the rotation angles of a single leg.
2012.13320
robot.jpg
0.417604
5fd5d5793fba4623a5232faf8a71d604
Representation of control trajectories for an individual robot.
2012.13320
trajectoy.jpg
0.424382
9c470cd6ae4c48afab40f35caafe451b
Bar plot comparison between testing set accuracy (measured as Dice score) for unsupervised deep clustering and reinforcement learning map selection (UDC + RL) and supervised deep learning/U-net (SDL). The average value is given by the height of the bars, and the standard deviation is represented by the error bars.
2012.13321
acc_comp_abbrev.jpg
0.484747
a6480c3a89f74c19bdcb330d313f38d7
Schematic of the unsupervised clustering convolutional neural network. The raw image is fed as input into the network with convolutional layers via 3 × 3 kernals and zero padding to keep subsequent layers the same H × W size. The three convolutional layers have 100 channels and each pixel has 100 features. Then argmax is obtained over the 100 features for each pixel, selecting the most important feature over the image.
2012.13321
clustering_cnn_architecture.jpg
0.401041
d02dd5c621204edabd103227f1489b77
Overview of the training scheme.
2012.13321
flow_chart_unsupervised_segmentation.jpg
0.396631
25f2d0e33276458e8438d3b92f09c21a
Sample mask predictions. (A) shows one of the testing set images, (B) displays the hand annotated mask overlaid in red, (C) shows the predicted mask from the unsupervised deep clustering reinforcement learning approach overlaid in green, and (D) shows both masks overlaid, noting that their region of overlap becomes yellow.
2012.13321
mask_example.jpg
0.410895
7ff0d3474ccb44038d77aad0a4e5c5fb
Set of clusters produced by the unsupervised deep clustering CNN. These serve as lesion mask candidates. The user can select the best image or mask number; here the best mask is clearly the first one, in the top left image. That cluster ℳ and its complement ℳ^C are then used to train the reinforcement learning network. The reinforcement learning network learns to select which is the best cluster (mask or its complement) to serve as lesion mask.
2012.13321
mask_picks.jpg
0.449759
8175714101404edca0f7600f7fccddd2
Architecture of deep Q learning CNN to select which region should be the lesion mask.
2012.13321
mask_selection_unsupervised_CNN_architecture.jpg
0.454916
9fbce6be53a5494ab47a7786f2ff227c
Illustration of target vs. output prediction from the network illustrated in Figure <ref>. On the right is a tiling of the input image. The individual cells are the so-called superpixels, generated by the SLIC method. For the purposes of illustration, a small subset of the image is analyzed on the left panel. The CNN from Figure <ref> predicts most important features of the 100-feature embeddings in the penultimate layer of said figure. The goal is for each pixel in a given superpixel to be the one type of feature. Here we illustrate three features as three shapes. The algorithm to generate the target is to make all pixels in a given superpixel equal to the most numerous or common feature type predicted in the CNN output.
2012.13321
target_from_CNN_output.jpg
0.369334
b3e663db2e4d4e2a91047b557d56cab1
Test set accuracy of reinforcement learning map selection as a function of training time. All 10 test set images have the correct mask selected by the fourth episode and there is no subsequent dip in accuracy to suggest over-fitting. Best fit sigmoid function curve is shown in red.
2012.13321
test_set_accuracy_learning_sigmoid_fit.jpg
0.398587
d7806c1ae0f84339ae732647f5340e07
Training set accuracy as a function of training time. A steady and monotonic increase is manifest.
2012.13321
training_score_learning.jpg
0.455958
cf87b277716b49848a04578cc977f4c8
The architecture of the proposed low-light enhancement network. The proposed LEUGAN consists of two branches, one is to process the original image, and the other is to enhance the original image after edge detection. Specific details are described in Sec. <ref>.
2012.13322
moxing.jpg
0.45319
ce4acc63b76940c896f1e2e4710443b6
Sketch of a section of constant t and φ of the black ring (figure based on Ref. <cit.>). The disc at x=1 and infinite annulus at x=-1 are the axes (fixed points) of ∂_φ, while the axis of the ring is at y=-1 (fixed points of ∂_ψ). Surfaces of constant y have topology S^1× S^2. y=-1/ν corresponds to the horizon (shaded surface) while surfaces of constant y∈(-1/ν,-1) are fatter rings containing the horizon in their interior.
2012.13323
BRPic.jpg
0.480357
d196886bd74d41db93bf953578ff3b34
ROC curves for all classes which are showing area under the curve (AUC) approximately equal to one.
2012.13325
Roc_MC.jpg
0.434186
89eb41f417914243bbc5ebe6ac808047
An illustration of the proposed hybrid model that has two components, i.e., Bayesian CNN module as a feature descriptor and active learning module. Image X_i is the queried image, Z_i is the Bayesian feature vector, T is the threshold value of uncertainty, and y_i is the predicted label.
2012.13325
Upd_dia_meth_FV3_1.PNG.jpg
0.456101
a5ae6daacf7843a0b062c7f61fdcbad5
Images of different dimensions in original data set (from ID=1 to ID=3) are centre-cropped to produce the dimensions of 224 × 224.
2012.13325
images_updated_last.jpg
0.424277
ba4be76683354e81bd989db344447fed
Diagram of CNN. Dropout layer is added after each convolutional layer, whereas feature map shows the output of each block after applying max-pooling where dropout is applied after each convolutional layer in the block.Also, FC1, FC2, FC3, and Sigmoid layer has 1024, 256, 64, and 1 neurons respectively.
2012.13325
mydiagarch2.jpg
0.523808
66493dbe7fab4cc694f79dd8496f1c55
(Color online) The usual MD simulation gives structure (e.g. pair correlation function g(r)) as an output given a pair potential V(r) at a fixed temperature and density. The above shows the conventional route to go to structure given the potential through MD and below shows the inverse problem of asking which pair potential lead to the observed pair correlation function using neural network (NN).
2012.13330
Fig1.jpg
0.448102
0434868b3640460d8ec26104b462c52d
(Color online) Learning curve for the NN based ML model studied: (top) Accuracy (r^2) and (bottom) relative error (RE) of the test data set (see text for details), as a function of number of data (N) in the training set. Both r^2 and RE saturate to a value of ∼ 0.975 and ∼ 0.09 respectively indicating a fairly accurate ML model within few hundred data points in the training set.
2012.13330
Fig2.jpg
0.385449
c9bc9f6ac2974d91a3d8c19553edf6e8
(Color online) Comparison between the true potential (red solid line) and the predicted potential using the ML algorithm for (a) crystalline state (b) liquid like state (c) gaseous state, where attractive part in the potential is relatively strong, moderate and identically equal to zero correspondingly. Inset shows typical configurations (for this potential) from the simulation for each cases, i.e. insets in (a), (b) and (c) shows crystalline state, liquid like state and gaseous state respectively.
2012.13330
Fig3.jpg
0.442482
c652773eecbf4107a860a12df96d76c9
(Color online) (a) Segregation order parameter f_ρ, that characterises mesoscopic fluctuations in the system shows crossover from a homogeneous steady state (see (c) for the snapshot) to a motility induced phase separated state (see (d) for the snapshot). (b) Strength of the attractive interaction or V_a (measured from the predicted potentials from ML) also show a similar crossover at Pé∼ 100.
2012.13330
Fig4.jpg
0.412742
b3dacb67b91f4d2c91f5a548412388f1
(Color online) (a) The bare interaction potential (solid red line) used for ABP simulation and the predicted effective potential (blue dashed line) (b) comparison between pair correlation function g(r) from MIPS (red solid line) and passive simulation with NN predicted potential (blue dashed line). Section of the snapshots taken from MIPS (c) and passive simulation (d) with NN predicted potential for a visual comparison between the states.
2012.13330
Fig5.jpg
0.479865
095a9d31e69d4a0da158177dc6bb1744
Learning curve for the NN based ML model: (left) Accuracy (r^2) and (right) relative error (RE) of the test data set as a function of number of data (N) in the training set where the dimensionality of the output vector n_0=40.
2012.13330
S1.jpg
0.420219
050fa1976f4e4465894b1a284e2ad44e
Learning curve for the RF model : (left) Accuracy (r^2) and (right) relative error (RE) of the test data set as a function of number of data (N) in the training set.
2012.13330
S2.jpg
0.416319
6ceb9c0a2daa48f0bfed5cf06ffa4239
(left) Accuracy (r^2) and (right) relative error (RE) of the test data set, as a function of epoch for Case A (see text).
2012.13330
S3.jpg
0.390979
606b1e6bfa064fe291c7a7d3e4e734b0
(left) Accuracy (r^2) and (right) relative error (RE) of the test data set, as a function of epoch for Case B (see text).
2012.13330
S4.jpg
0.417546
17460b4b52134653845230cc5f864659
Evaluation of q(λ), for λ = (10, 10, λ_3), 90 ≤λ_3 ≤ 1200.
2012.13331
Figure1.jpg
0.45435
f18cd7fdb9b34a05a8eef6bb6ad441b7
CG iterations for flat and warm start. Left axis shows the RMP objective function value as the difference of g^(k) from the optimal LD bound g^* = $32,169,154.7. Right axis shows total columns at each iteration. UC MILP solved with 0.01% optimality gap. For comparison purposes, note that the objective function value of IR is $32,149,006.2 (less tight bound).
2012.13331
Figure2.jpg
0.436003
260a84bdaa9e4bb38ffe84ec50a382d4
Raman maps in BRS configuration for the reference a) and stressed sample c). The spectrum acquired on top of the waveguide is also displayed on the right. Only one Voigts function fits the reference spectrum in b), and two functions are needed for the stressed waveguide in d). A schematic view of the device cross-section is also included.
2012.13336
BRS.jpg
0.413274
7b510eeb7c2e4b398b488fbb919a171e
Raman spectra recorded by IRS with a x'-polarised laser pump (e_i=x', quasi-TE optical mode) at λ=1335 nm and free scattered polarization (e_s). The Raman peak is fitted with one or two Voigt functions for the reference a) and stressed sample b), respectively.
2012.13336
IRS2peaksfit2.jpg
0.487118
32ba3510adf84a7a8b4abf58db02417d
Experimental areas of the two Voigt components used to fit the IRS spectra in function of the scattered polarization e_s. The incident laser pump polarization is kept along the e_i=x' direction. When e_s=0^∘, the scattered polarization is along the x' direction.
2012.13336
Polar.jpg
0.428149
8a41e2a5624a499d9b903bca5468b680
Raman spectroscopy set-up combining IRS and BRS configurations. BRS experiments are performed with a λ=473 nm laser pump incident along the z'=[001] direction of silicon and only one phonon is typically probed. This technique is coupled to a mobile stage allowing the mapping of the device. IRS experiments exploit the confinement of a 1335 nm laser pump into a y'=[1-10] oriented monomode waveguide. The incident and scattered polarization allow to probe up to three phonons.
2012.13336
Ramansetup2.jpg
0.418072
4a148a0e81984e4abda987be8ce95017
Stress and optical mode confinement simulation. a) Dimensions of the waveguide and simulation window. b) Optical quasi-TE mode confined in the waveguide at λ=1335 nm. c) to f) Stress field distribution of the four non-zero components of the stress tensor. The effective stress values, considering the overlap with the electric field distribution of the optical mode, are indicated on the top of each respective window.
2012.13336
Simu.jpg
0.490488
4f6a382b644d462dbc5c3ec4ba5fc4f9
PSD of transmitted signal from the antenna with the highest spectral regrowth with DAB under per-antenna power constraint in (<ref>); LoS channel, B = 16 antennas, U = 1 users, equal PAs as in (<ref>). By controlling ρ_max,b, we can bound the spectral regrowth within a given mask limit.
2012.13337
PSD_resub.jpg
0.466103
96bc1d34b06746ad93842cc2a91d6f40
CDF of the sum rate with ZF and DAB precoders with perfect and imperfect CSI at the transmitter; geometric channel model, B = 32 antennas, U ∈{2, 8} users, equal PAs with β_1^(b) = 1, and β_3^(b) = -0.049-0.023j for b = 1, …, B, ρ_tot = 43 dBm, N_0 = -85 dBm (corresponding to SNR_avg = 18 dB).
2012.13337
resub_fig6_v6.jpg
0.469006
ce45e53ea7974c61b131d8b491142c15
Achievable rates averaged over 500 realizations of LoS channels in (<ref>) with uniformly randomly distributed AoDs ψ∈ [0, 180), B=10 antennas at base station and U=1 user. The nonlinearity coefficients are as in Table <ref>. With distortion-aware precoding, the achievable rate becomes a strictly increasing function of the SNR.
2012.13337
rev_awesome_plot_example8.jpg
0.412914
b3ad905403ae4252a8a85a80eb57a01a
CDF of sum rates with different linear precoders; geometric channel model, B = 32 antennas, U = 4 users, equal PAs with β_1^(b) = 1, and β_3^(b) = -0.049-0.023j for b = 1, …, B, ρ_tot = 43 dBm, and SNR_avg∈{-15, 25} dB.
2012.13337
rev_fig5_v2.jpg
0.431728
ed6e48c810c64f65862f14b8270d849b
Average sum rate with different linear precoders with and without power control; geometric channel model, B = 32 antennas, U = 4 users, equal PAs with β_1^(b) = 1, and β_3^(b) = -0.049-0.023j for b = 1, …, B, N_0 = -85 dBm.
2012.13337
rev_fig7_v10.jpg
0.46767
8f8cc92657cb40c9b4a32800c7ca565e
CDF of total base station side consumed power with ZF, DAB and EE-DAB precoders for R_0 = 35 (bits/c.u.); geometric channel model, B = 64 antennas, U = 4 users, equal PAs with β_1^(b) = 1, and β_3^(b) = -0.049-0.023j for b = 1, …, B, N_0 = -85 dBm, power consumption model parameters η_max,b = 0.55 and ρ_max,b= 25 dBm.
2012.13337
rev_fig8_v3.jpg
0.407049
7dc08c47eec84c499963efa21a3d3486
Massive MIMO downlink with linear precoding and nonlinear PAs at the transmitter.
2012.13337
system_model_v9.jpg
0.396084
756aa8e1a7694ad5a57032f1a159f599
Diagrammatic representation of the 1+→ 2 all-orders equation defined in Eq. (<ref>), where the open circle representing _0 contains all two-particle irreducible diagrams in the s_f = P_f^2 channel.
2012.13338
H_amp.jpg
0.477628
39541ae379b74636942f08a2881d95de
On-shell projection of , where the left hand side is Eq. (<ref>) and the right hand side is Eq. (<ref>). The white box indicates the real function 𝐇.
2012.13338
H_ampOnShell.jpg
0.396084
597f79e9ef244f2e9991463bfc8d575f
(a) Self-consistent integral equation for the hadronic scattering amplitude as given in Eq. (<ref>). (b) Examples of diagrams contributing to the Bethe-Salpeter kernel, _0, which contains all s-channel two-particle irreducible diagrams.
2012.13338
M_amp.jpg
0.497666
f9807a73700743feac093d982fb9cf1b
Singularities of the scalar and S wave case of the loop integral as reproduced by the function Sing _00;00. The value of the spatial momentum |P⃗_f,i^⋆|=(2π/6)m.
2012.13338
Sing.jpg
0.357343
cf981f174fc84137b794cf9475637c4b
Diagrammatic representation of the expansion shown in Eq. (<ref>). The dotted line in the first term represents the pole piece of the propagator, D_2, and the second term is a new smooth kernel we define as _L|0.
2012.13338
W_L.jpg
0.396084
cbcc8be6dc2c463386d884ed9d61c929
Diagrammatic representations of the all-orders equations for _1B given in Eq. (<ref>) and _1B in Eq. (<ref>), where the open circle is the kernel i_0|0.
2012.13338
W_amp.jpg
0.432389
0ef824d15d2849259884c9cf86073115
(a) The relation between the full 2+→ 2 amplitude and _ as defined in Eq. <ref>. (b) Depicted are all allowed current insertions over the external legs. The symbol “Σ" is used as a shorthand to express this sum. The dotted lines represent the pole piece D of the propagator, the other objects are defined in Fig. <ref>.
2012.13338
W_and_Sigma.jpg
0.540057
6709a72817144cd9bd0c8d962df5790b
Diagrammatic representation of the amplitudes considered in this work. Shown are the (a) 2→ 2, (b) 1+→ 1, (c) 1+→ 2, and (d) 2+→ 2 amplitudes along with momentum assignments.
2012.13338
amplitudes.jpg
0.477628
4883ed3092584200adcc0087155af470
Iterated loop identity as given in Eq. (<ref>), where the open circle is the Bethe-Salpeter kernel _0, the box with label j is the j-th kernel, and the dashed line indicates the two-particle phase space cut which places intermediate state particles on-shell.
2012.13338
loop_id.jpg
0.471325
a67d888862874074b1e93bf2dedf853e
(a) 2→ 2, (b) 1+→ 2, and (c) 2+→ 2 amplitudes near the resonance pole, s_R. The residues at the pole define the coupling, c, transition form-factor, f_1→ R, and elastic resonance form-factor, f_R→ R.
2012.13338
resonance.jpg
0.471214
71f46cadacc044d6b51919619da1eb21
Decomposition of triangle diagram into on-shell pieces involving new kernels _0|C|0, _L|0, _R|0.
2012.13338
triangle_decomp.jpg
0.483904
d3615e1afd5944339c914002478b4d1f
Triangle-function contribution to _, Eq. (<ref>), written in terms of the single-hadron form-factors (f_j) and the triangle loops (_j) defined in Eq. (<ref>). The gray circle and dashed lines were defined in Figs. <ref> and <ref>, respectively. The open semi-circles represent the modified spherical harmonics, defined in Eq. (<ref>), which have the angular momenta associated with the initial and final two-particle states.
2012.13338
triangle_function.jpg
0.40628
95f7e29baf03440596969c8438672bfe
Cycle constraint. We link audio and video latent spaces with a cycle constraint that ensures that the audio signal content is preserved through video decoding and encoding.
2012.13341
cycle.jpg
0.458373
a181f33e52b64777afe4ed0ee7aa8d35
Disentanglement, by mixing content encodings from two speakers saying the same phones (_c_i with '_c_i) and style encodings from the same speaker saying different words (_s_a with '_s_a).
2012.13341
disentanglement_compact.jpg
0.456598
a330fc650c9e4fa8a4ba3548cd945a91
Word analysis. Instances (different rows) of the same words are encoded with a similar video sequence (single row), yet the show pronunciation variations if spoken by different speakers.
2012.13341
flattened_video_face_content.jpg
0.422351
808886c6ce8847cbaab96b99110baaf0
Environment sounds visualization. Although not trained for it, our approach also visualizes natural sounds. Here showing a clear difference between chirp and alarm clock.
2012.13341
flattened_video_face_content_esc.jpg
0.407215
30b7b6e1bc6c4680bdabdd725e6035af
Style analysis. Opposed to the content encoding, the style encoding enhances different speakers influence (rows) while having similar encodings across different words (columns).
2012.13341
new_words_style_face_cycle_log_flipped.jpg
0.433573
e6c8983919ac4e38a6cae18a08b12dd6
Overview. A joint latent encoding is learned with audio and video VAEs that are linked with a cycle constraint and augmented with a smoothness constraint (Δ v annotation).
2012.13341
overview.jpg
0.439151
e34f5e70bc8b4a0e85ec0d88073d339d
Smoothness evaluation by plotting the latent embedding of an audio snipped in 3D via dimensionality reduction. Left: Without smoothness constraint, consecutive audio sample embeddings are scattered. Right: Our full model leads to smoother trajectories.
2012.13341
smoothness_MDS4.jpg
0.426129
6d211b507f6f4dee93f53914bdad1475
: A tool developed towards the long-term goal of helping hearing impaired persons to see what they can not hear. We map an audio stream to video and thereby use faces or numbers for visualizing the high-dimensional audio features intuitively. Different from the principle of lip reading, this can encode general sound and pass on information on the style of spoken language.
2012.13341
teaser.jpg
0.414728
8bc94056a8fa46e69a325b7b5e9c39ed
Throughput. The information throughput can be measured by mapping from audio to video and back. Playing the depicted Mel Spectrogram shows that the speech is still recognizable.
2012.13341
throughput.jpg
0.509229
c894044b0b494b06af1f369eeb075f19
Model Comparison on content questions. The mean user accuracy and standard deviation for distinguishing phoneme sequences is compared between the models, annotated with the significance level († for 0.05<p<0.1, * for p<0.05, ** for p<0.01). The mean accuracy for random guessing is 0.384.
2012.13341
user_study_phoneme.jpg
0.439649
860cfc28f5f94510aff4f6141fb3b724
`A schematic illustration of an unconstrained plate exhibiting residual stress. (a) The two elements composing the plate are shows side by side. (b) As the red trapezoid is too large to fit into the square opening, it is compressed. (c) For a plate sufficiently thin, the induced compression exceeds the buckling threshold, and the trapezoid buckles out of plane. Note that there are many shapes that preserve all lengths along the faces of the plate, yet they cannot be planar' <cit.>.
2012.13345
EfratiPic1.jpg
0.415509
844fbbc08ed84a9c991b09742f4025fa
An example vertical volume slice is given on the left with high cone beam angle artefacts visible on top of the reconstruction. The graph showing the total of grey-values per slice is given on the right. The red and orange bars highlight the slices that were discarded (50 slices from top and bottom). The corresponding graph of grey-values for the first 50 slices also show the spike of high cone-beam artefact on top, and the bottom 50 the lack of any apple information. The middle 668 slices were used for parallel beam simulations (Dataset A) and those with added Gaussian noise (Dataset B).
2012.13346
3Drecon_highconebeam.jpg
0.422063
6a5e1b37de7245fa8150c6b0473805e9
Baseline filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstructions for full angular range and the two limited-view data setup. The grey-values of the Dataset B and C reconstructions are set to the same range of Dataset A.
2012.13346
baseline_recons.jpg
0.412905
d91cf28763f547e7bd66d5577e129561
A horizontal cross-section of a healthy apple is shown on the left, and another cross-section with browning defects of the same apple shown on the right. The red arrows point to larger browning defects across the slice.
2012.13346
defect_browning.jpg
0.364452
37d81dde572b47998c708fb804d7808e
A bar chart that shows the defect percentage distribution for all defects within the Test subset. The percentage distribution is determined using the resulting data split sequence obtained via the simple heuristic method (referred to as "Empirical") and mixed-integer quadratic programming solvers MOSEK via MATLAB ("MOSEK") and ECOS_BB via Python, ("ECOS_BB").
2012.13346
defect_percentage_full.jpg
0.397039
69e684cc49b04a7cb89b8b5af8b5881a
A bar chart that shows the defect percentage distribution for all defects within the Test subset. The percentage distribution is determined using the resulting data split sequence obtained via the simple heuristic method (referred to as "Empirical") and mixed-integer quadratic programming solvers MOSEK via MATLAB ("MOSEK") and ECOS_BB via Python, ("ECOS_BB").
2012.13346
defect_percentage_partial.jpg
0.500286
0e7ec4e5ae3743cca8afaf8aa3bb0902
An illustration of the circular cone-beam CT geometry set up is shown on the left; example slices for the vertical and horizontal directions in the reconstructed volumes on the right.
2012.13346
fig1.jpg
0.470734
725de5c83e044e1a874378f419c86a55
Different angular samplings of generated parallel beam data: (left to right) full angular range, missing wedge sampling 1 and missing wedge sampling 2. Blue lines indicate the projection angles that were selected for the limited-view data setup.
2012.13346
missing_wedges.jpg
0.426404
078e4e02c900461cb8a31cf78d1559a1
MS-D post-processing results for the Target 1 shown in Figure <ref>. The FBP reconstructions used as inputs are given for both missing wedge angular samplings for each data, and the resulting output by the network. The grey-values of the Dataset B and C reconstructions are set to the same range of Dataset A.
2012.13346
msd_results_target1.jpg
0.382547
a05c1325926346bc9920fdda2e74c582
MS-D post-processing results for the Target 2 shown in Figure <ref>. The FBP reconstructions used as inputs are given for both missing wedge angular samplings for each data, and the resulting output by the network. The grey-values of the Dataset B and C reconstructions are set to the same range of Dataset A.
2012.13346
msd_results_target2.jpg
0.413315
1c7a95bedb5449d6a8cc6af5bb4018ea
The target apple slices for the MS-D network.
2012.13346
msd_target_slices.jpg
0.524143
a5801e3d878e40ccacb9d60d83a7f30a
Parallel beam projection geometry used to generate Datasets A and B
2012.13346
par_geom.jpg
0.438596
340b3b87b4f544569ee4e50d4f5a9781
The effect of scattering on an apple slice as the scattering intensity scaling factor, α is increased. Here, α = 0 signifies no scattering, and α = 1 the scattering of water with no additional intensity.
2012.13346
scatter_comparison.jpg
0.43589
2192452891884358ad7bbab058da5531
An elliptic plate with semi-major axis a and semi-minor axis b. The principal axes 𝐪̂_i's of the plate are related to 𝐞̂_i's under rotation by an angle θ.
2012.13347
PA-fig-02.jpg
0.409153
349ad91963304d30ba6c5faaeebe1433
CORLAT Test Set
2012.13349
CORLAT_Test_NB_vs_Target.jpg
0.408014
1b86c8c15b84426794a713edb9efe9ff
CORLAT Training Set
2012.13349
CORLAT_Train_NB_vs_Target.jpg
0.432201
dc1a5212aeab4fefa70ca1b90f441ed5
An integer program can be represented as a bipartite graph such that one set of nodes represent variables, the other set constraints, and edges correspond to the non-zeros of the constraint matrix. {A, b, c} can be encoded as features of the graph's nodes and edges. A graph neural network takes the graph and its node and edge features as input and computes a fixed dimensional continuous vector for each node. These vectors can then be used to make node-specific predictions.
2012.13349
MIP_GNN.jpg
0.403758
e5b9f470d9e74eb6a862d992bfa02191
Bipartite graph representation of a MIP used as the input to a neural network. The set of n variables {x_1,…,x_n} and the set of m constraints {δ_1,…,δ_m} form the two sets of nodes of the bipartite graph. The coefficients are encoded as features of the nodes and edges.
2012.13349
MIP_bipartite_graph2.jpg
0.458489
a70e48ff9ed54b66b692232849f139a0
Neural Network Verification Test Set
2012.13349
NN_Verification_Test_NB_vs_Target.jpg
0.464574
b831bbaf4e404cb6819e6999f636ffd5
Neural Network Verification Training Set
2012.13349
NN_Verification_Train_NB_vs_Target.jpg
0.410285
c7584be2cf824b8c98aab5fd86e88073
Overview of our approach. We construct two neural network-based components to be used in a MIP solver, Neural Diving and Neural Branching. Neural Diving uses a generative model which, given the MIP to be solved, generates partial assignments for its integer variables. The resulting “sub-MIPs" for un-assigned variables are then solved in parallel to construct high-quality complete assignments for the original input MIP. The generative model is trained on pairs of MIPs and feasible assignments (not necessarily optimal) precomputed with an off-the-shelf solver. Neural Branching is a learned policy that conditions on a leaf node of the current search tree to pick the next integer variable to branch on. It guides the tree search to quickly produce a short proof for how far the solution produced by Neural Diving is from optimum. The policy is trained to imitate an expensive “expert” policy, Full Strong Branching, that is designed to produce small trees. Combining the two produces a Neural MIP solver which is customized to the distribution of MIPs for the application of interest. Results show that such a solver outperforms the solver SCIP, even after tuning SCIP's parameters for each application and even when the parallel computation of Neural Diving is performed sequentially.
2012.13349
intro_overview.jpg
0.475972
82beff02f6d349e6a54fdeec47e40ee2
Main result of the paper: our approach, Neural Branching + Neural Diving, matches or outperforms SCIP with respect to the primal-dual gap <cit.>, averaged on held-out instances, as a function of running time (referred to as calibrated time, see section <ref>) for the five datasets in our evaluation with the largest MIPs. Note the log scale on both axes.
2012.13349
intro_plot_23Jul2021.jpg
0.499276
129313a0563c411681653507dba0d163
Histogram of speedup factors for all MIPs in MIPLIB at root.
2012.13349
miplib_hist.jpg
0.498192
7a8203d357ba4375b76d6756518934f4
Solve time vs number of LPs in a batch.
2012.13349
num_lps_v_time.jpg
0.450124
5df38b3da21a4361a81cef91e791dd81
Network statistics for the presolved datasets.
2012.13349
presolved_network_stats.jpg
0.432817
36bef66552784a2ebf3b4e1b7ab869b2
Average dual gap as a function of calibrated time on neural network verification instances.
2012.13349
supercuts_avg_dual_gap_by_time_logy_no_root_time_hline_old.jpg
0.474283
f7eb9fb672a34d69938eb8ecf162b993
Number of instances as a function of the difference between the number of selected cuts at the root and the number of cuts in the baseline.
2012.13349
supercuts_cut_diff_hist.jpg
0.409378
5016cd9633974e50a887bed38aa83ee3
Survival plot with respect to calibrated running time. This plot only considers time after the root node.
2012.13349
supercuts_surv_no_root_time.jpg
0.457473
6e47090856144d73b32682a0c47122ef
Conditionally independent model (Section <ref>) infers node embeddings {v_1,…,v_n} for the variable nodes of the bipartite graph representation of an input MIP M using a graph convolutional network and applies a multi-layer perceptron to the node embeddings {v_d}_d ∈ℐ of the set of binary variables ℐ in M to compute their Bernoulli distributions. (See Section <ref> for the case of general integers.) These distributions are independent of each other conditioned on the input MIP.
2012.13349
supermip_models2.jpg
0.682992
51117d93e16e4bd9bdfc1830f27be44c
`A beam (a) before bending and (b) after bending; (c) a close-up of the displacement field' <cit.>, where h is the thickness of the beam and R is the radius of the curvature of deformation.
2012.13351
HowellWrong.jpg
0.45959
bd4f72a654a54c9eae48786d59e032d5
Slip for δ b.
2012.13353
Oden1Cur.jpg
0.417156
b28fa50544254350a0e71419fdf5cde6
Displacement field of the modified Kikuchi and Oden's model.
2012.13353
Oden1Eg01.jpg
0.409897
575fc2650634460db50ac06ddac75bd0
Slip and stick regions of the modified Kikuchi and Oden's model.
2012.13353
Oden1Eg02.jpg
0.533336
3a77d909cd4345acb5bacdb3f1c38f16
Slip for h.
2012.13353
Oden1H.jpg
0.50554
46d76a09105b4c09b59aaba76737759c
Slip for ν.
2012.13353
Oden1Poi.jpg
0.590354
e2731ab8fa694a46a2440d605c3db6b8
Slip for δτ.
2012.13353
Oden1T.jpg
0.500647
e77f022c661b4d4ead8bcb3240deaf69
Tension ratio against δ b.
2012.13353
PrismEqnPlot2.jpg