dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.384332
2ac6e64c0a1243d3919a4ebd5367282b
Correlationg accuracy on ANLI with importance alignment (𝒜^H and 𝒜^S) for all wrong examples. The cross, circle, and triangle refer to rounds 1, 2, and 3 of ANLI, respectively.
2012.13354
accuracy.jpg
0.460144
331cc61dd34b4d74b24bf9567100ae89
Accuracy on ANLI is not correlated with importance alignment (𝒜^H and 𝒜^S). The cross, circle, and triangle refer to rounds 1, 2, and 3 of ANLI, respectively.
2012.13354
accuracy_subset.jpg
0.45267
f4750f192b5d449e8adfd9d18fb739b1
Correlating accuracy on HANS with importance alignment for all wrong examples. Alignment values are averaged across rounds because HANS is not divided into rounds.
2012.13354
hans_accuracy.jpg
0.381074
48d44e6351134101be1361ee8b546b5f
Correlating accuracy on ANLI with importance alignment (𝒜^H and 𝒜^S) for all wrong examples. The cross, circle, and triangle refer to rounds 1, 2, and 3 of ANLI, respectively.
2012.13354
hans_accuracy_heuristics.jpg
0.417282
6a4edb67510a49429307fe9cddb8eaf1
Accuracy on HANS is not correlated with importance alignment. Alignment values are averaged across rounds because HANS is not divided into rounds.
2012.13354
hans_accuracy_subset.jpg
0.472551
3ba196b091e34f4e8c8ec0bd6f9293ba
Correlating accuracy on HANS with importance alignment for all wrong examples. Alignment values are averaged across rounds because HANS is not divided into rounds.
2012.13354
hans_accuracy_subset_heuristics.jpg
0.453122
f0f7a10ab64a4c0b96583a8740c9c59d
An example illustrating different token-level importance values. “Model Importance” is color coded by absolute value integrated gradients attribution for BERT-base. The other three rows show the oracle importance scores estimated by the hard, soft and expert oracles (darker values indicate more important).
2012.13354
sampleexample.jpg
0.519564
38a64a635a29416c863c71f8950ed32a
The Gauss map Φ:m → S^(N-2), maps points p defined on the worldsheet to the unit sphere S^(N-2).
2012.13358
map_Gauss.jpg
0.45102
78f0fde9c32d407ea3e410408969d3e9
Plugin generalization architectural views.
2012.13363
alg-generalization.jpg
0.488293
d2eadc93251d4b4c934ce8d2c5adf5f2
Algorithms generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
algorithms.jpg
0.549179
de198713cebf4ada8f6f9ab223a42923
Algorithms generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
algorithms.jpg
0.475142
be8b8f5dc7ac4af7b771bce9dc091650
Authentication process using an identity provider.
2012.13363
authenticationworkflow.jpg
0.490361
365bd46effc94a92997facc5248a841f
Client-Server architectural view.
2012.13363
clientserver.jpg
0.407061
f96fb534276e427e8899f1c413a77e94
Graph data model architectural view.
2012.13363
datamodel.jpg
0.534474
e4e853ca06fc4c4f991fa30aaab8493f
Decomposition architectural view.
2012.13363
decomposition.jpg
0.44109
c64dc21f9a354818bc2a37b69ce5cd17
Decomposition architectural view.
2012.13363
decomposition.jpg
0.487662
5171028f8e5d46a3b6884c725ff83fe6
Controller generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
generalization-controllers.jpg
0.469733
14e42f1fea0a4a92b667c3f91919a6f3
Formatter generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
generalization-formatters.jpg
0.445989
6b7b8c67375c4c7b8e5102e0c78ffc5f
Repository generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
generalization-repositories.jpg
0.548139
7df6bf4f349a40d594272026b3d5fd1e
Security generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
generalization-security.jpg
0.438316
feb950e41de6497d8e1f3e6b192fe8ed
Service generalization architectural view.
2012.13363
generalization-services.jpg
0.464665
a65b481bf250401eba9d9f9e8ca9869f
Layered architectural view.
2012.13363
layered.jpg
0.473849
dadb6e6477094a0d9492ab2241b4a057
Layered architectural view.
2012.13363
layered.jpg
0.494724
5c6e553f62224c9c90e3da6ccaf63bde
Example representation of phylogenetic data.
2012.13363
phylogenetic.jpg
0.443456
3598b21c616e49cbad76067b2f0fb493
Example representation of typing data.
2012.13363
typing.jpg
0.453343
1aacf2ee92f0471e9113cabde0c989c9
Use cases.
2012.13363
usecases.jpg
0.412934
d7332f512137498d879eee39b3989ed2
Uses architectural view.
2012.13363
uses.jpg
0.402014
b964d74a81a448549004fd5b85de49d0
Uses architectural view.
2012.13363
uses.jpg
0.486898
eac7cdb76caa4d44ad305e63c788e6b4
Example of a workflow system.
2012.13363
workflow.jpg
0.498438
2789efbeaa044146a9803d82aa57c567
Network architecture overview. Given Cine-MR volumes with the size t × h × w from the training dataset as input, we pass it through the segmentation network to obtain output segmentation masks for the LV cavity and Myo. A segmentation loss is computed based on the ground truth. To make predictions for 11 indices and cardiac phase detection, we utilize a multi-task spatio-temporal network with two parallel branches. Then a multi-task loss is calculated on the target prediction for both regression and classification tasks and is back-propagated to the segmentation network.
2012.13364
LVQaun_model.jpg
0.414912
6704a4bedfcd4e9c865c7b38892ff321
Representation of gradient flow between segmentation, regression and classification tasks in our cardiac quantification framework.
2012.13364
LV_gradient.jpg
0.448689
ff3af223a1f44ca78d1107356c002d47
A schematic representation of LV indices for short-axis cardiac Cine-MR image. The LV and Myo cavity areas are shown with green and blue colors in (a) and three LV cavity dimensions with black arrows in (b). (c) shows Six myocardial regional-wall thicknesses, namely anterolateral (AL), inferolateral (IL), inferior (I), inferoseptal (IS), anterior (A), inferoseptal (IS) and anteroseptal (AS). The cardiac phase (systole or diastole) is shown in (d).
2012.13364
LV_indcies.jpg
0.417182
93a7376730f140bf824bcfc4f925c716
LV MR image slices before(first row) and after pre-processing and normalisation (second row).
2012.13364
LV_preprocessing.jpg
0.421533
ebaa96fbea8f49d3a2e6eecd9e6ecd46
Qualitative segmentation results of DR-UNet 2D. The red contour shows the ground truth segmentation contour, and the blue color is overlaid as the proposed model prediction output. The row 1-2 shows the first 10 slices with their segmentation error. The row 2-4 illustrate frames 11 to 20 with segmentation error respectively. It can be seen, that segmentation error is quite low for both endocardium and epicardium contours in most of the frames.
2012.13364
LV_segOut.jpg
0.482337
b56b14a7bf7c4267868b3b0e029e9e79
The schematic illustration of our left ventricle segmentation network equipped with dilated convolutions(4 dilation rate 1-8) in the bottleneck to capture multi-scale features and residual blocks in the encoder path.
2012.13364
UNet_model.jpg
0.385965
37f5236c69d8449ea48c0a43566b1e35
Multi-objective selection of linear models. For each variable to be explained, we represent the position of all linear models in the objective space (corrected Akaike criterion AICc and adjusted R^2). The color of points gives the number of observations.
2012.13367
Fig3.jpg
0.373761
3c45e0126e9e4af1ae54b2153d5cc1cb
The effect of different widths of solvent layers on the SWAXS profile. The chop parameter has minimal effect on the SWAXS profile due to our use of uniform implicit solvent model. Note that in the FM algorithm, we used the largest width of solvent layer corresponding to chop parameter of 0.001.
2012.13370
chopplt.jpg
0.418784
48b0397d1cd84e48853cae0f1094decf
(a) The fits from different FM steps to the experimental SWAXS profile of 25bp dsDNA. The profiles are offset by different scale factors for easy visualization. The scattering intensity is shown using a logarithmic scale that magnifies subtle disagreements. (b) The refinement traces of χ^2 (solid) and |∇_d(χ^2)| (transparent) for all the FM steps. Good convergence can be observed by decaying χ^2 and L2-norm of the gradient within a few hundred iterations. (c) The total electrons for all FM steps. (d) The density maps of the refined electron densities from different FM steps. The density maps are presented with the same coloring scheme as the curves. The maps were generated using PyMOL (Schrodinger, New York, NY). Each subsequent density map varies in resolution and recapitulates the experimental data to a specified q_max. We construct a wire plot associated with each density map by extracting coordinates of the voxels that contain more than 80% of the maximum density. These maps are shown with the same color code used in the top-left panel. The first density map is from DENSS using small-angle data. See main text for detail.
2012.13370
demo3.jpg
0.425776
f795743ce1534e348c51bf34169ab691
The effect of electron density smearing on the SWAXS profile. The smearing parameter, σ, has minimal effects on the SWAXS profile when σ < 1.0. Note that in the FM algorithm, 0.3 < σ < 1.0 always.
2012.13370
gaussianplt.jpg
0.396963
fbda34f4792b40a2b914302efd654060
(a) We simulate a normally distributed random variable X and convert it to the linear and customized χ^2 metric shown in pink and blue respectively, using μ=3.39× 10^5 and σ=1.67× 10^5 from one experimental point at q=1.25^-1. The solid line is the distribution of Eq. (<ref>) with r = μ/σ = 2.03. The inset focuses on y > 1 and shows the differences between two distributions. (b) The distribution of Eq. (<ref>) with different signal-to-noise values ranging from 0.75 to 25.0.
2012.13370
logchi2.jpg
0.443741
07a0ec8776df43cb93cc096cec38e18d
The application of FM algorithm to different systems: (a) RNA hairpin (hpRNA), (b) RNA triplex (tsRNA), (c) metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) and (d) a short strand of single-stranded RNA (ssRNA). Each panel displays the experimental data and FM fit, with residuals computed from Eq. (<ref>), the FM refined electron density and corresponding wire plot as in Fig. <ref>. The two cross-sections associated with either density map or wire plot represent sections through the midsection (left) or across the top (right) viewing into the central axis of the molecule. See main text for detailed explanation.
2012.13370
results.jpg
0.468783
f557d53eea3b479688b1c23cb672b313
The schematics of Algorithm <ref>. At each FM step, the electron density is smeared before being split. After splitting, the algorithm carves the electron density to reveal finer structures on length scales defined by q_max^(i) and proceeds to the next FM step.
2012.13370
schematics_green.jpg
0.47988
d92eb44ead2941a7b178531e5d150164
The effect of different voxel splitting sizes on the SWAXS profile. The splitting parameter, z, has minimal effect on the SWAXS profile when z > 0.75. Note that in the FM algorithm, it marches to higher q and z > 1.0 always.
2012.13370
zoomplt.jpg
0.396507
2a04c2275a774413a5476f0e3d17924f
Relative gain of NL over Linear processing in downlink for 4x4 and 8x4 MU-MIMO configuration for indoor measurement positions.
2012.13371
mobi_gains_dl_indoor_pat_3.jpg
0.391374
9ad8ad648e084645a1adff05e411133c
Relative gain of NL over Linear processing in uplink for 4x4 and 8x4 MU-MIMO configuration for indoor measurement positions.
2012.13371
mobi_gains_ul_indoor_pat_3.jpg
0.450492
4291662be95f4da4a3b0b4c81746d1f9
Relative gain of NL over Linear processing in uplink for 4x4 and 8x4 MU-MIMO configuration for outdoor measurement positions.
2012.13371
mobi_gains_ul_outdoor_pat_3.jpg
0.508957
0c4a68d3db064f18884b466844c24b0f
The impact of ue specific dmrs power boosting on system performance.
2012.13371
pilot_boost_pat_2.jpg
0.451132
3818aced808341a49582f794489f3254
Activation of output of the transform function at different stages of GCNet. Best viewed in color.
2012.13375
activation_32.jpg
0.484007
5d1a16299b8e45ab8dc380e3306fdc26
Distributions of class selectivity index of ResNet-50 baseline and ResNet-50+GCNet on different layers. For deeper layers, GCNet exhibits less class selectivity compared to the baseline. Best viewed in color.
2012.13375
merged.jpg
0.461085
7d639d2750524968b742b3dedfb8d173
Visualizations of context modeling attention maps (heatmaps) of GCNet and NLNet (red points denote query positions). Their learnt attention maps are mostly similar. Also, they learn to focus more on hard cases like relatively small size, deformation, occlusion, and blur. Best viewed in color.
2012.13375
nl_attn_map.jpg
0.498388
4603449f33284fe58cbe4debbe38a769
Architecture of the main blocks. The feature maps are shown as feature dimensions, e.g. CxHxW denotes a feature map with channel number C, height H and width W. ⊗ denotes matrix multiplication, ⊕ denotes broadcast element-wise addition, and ⊙ denotes broadcast element-wise multiplication.
2012.13375
structure-all.jpg
0.383446
0bb70f89bb5b4e59bded432938cfeeca
Two instantiations of the non-local block: Embedded Gaussian and Gaussian. The feature maps are shown by their dimensions, e.g. CxHxW. ⊗ denotes matrix multiplication, and ⊕ is broadcast element-wise addition. For two matrices with different dimensions, broadcast operations first broadcast features in each dimension to match the dimensions of the two matrices. The feature maps marked in red (e.g. `5 att') are statistically analyzed in Tables <ref>, <ref> and <ref>.
2012.13375
structure-nl.jpg
0.415691
581e8df0cb3b4180b3e2b27313e466b4
Visualization of attention maps (heatmaps) for different query positions (red points) in a non-local block on COCO object detection. The three attention maps are all almost the same. More examples are presented in Figure <ref>.
2012.13375
teaser.jpg
0.438754
ebf25d6607034686927d14c25ed952c6
Visualization of attention maps (heatmaps) for different query positions (red points) in a non-local block on COCO object detection. For the same image, the attention maps of different query points are almost the same. Best viewed in color.
2012.13375
vis.jpg
0.511122
69d2ee416d504ced9564c4bbae74ffc2
Performance of 6 physical microscopic car-following models.
2012.13376
6_Physics_models.jpg
0.406055
54015577005741e793a83a2766e96115
The performance comparison of the prediction-only PIDL-IDM and PUNN over 50 experiments.
2012.13376
PIDL-IDM_varia.jpg
0.417847
014c02c70f4742619e70b2e1c7a02d39
Structure of the DL-based CFM.
2012.13376
PUNN.jpg
0.467641
e6c9d70a55d742bf8473911cb0edea24
Relationship between raw trajectory data, observed data, collocation data, and training-validation-test split.
2012.13376
data_stuff.jpg
0.498469
d106004855ee4f6fb3725434ba304778
Training and validation error curves for the accelerating regime when (n_O,n_C,α) = (20, 20, 0.1).
2012.13376
error_curve.jpg
0.488561
147c6ee6fa9d4a6c9b5c91828c5b1273
Architecture of PIDL.
2012.13376
just_PIDL.jpg
0.485154
321e5c23dff14241ab96cd579e8d2772
Illustrative flowcharts for estimating x, a vector encapsulating all parameters to be estimated, using controls optimized by (a) GRAPE, (b) RL, and (c) the analytical scheme. In all panels, the blue dashed line indicates that subsequent control should be optimized according to updated estimations of the parameters of the previous step. In (a), GRAPE has to be rerun whenever an updated estimation of the parameters is encountered. In (b), the training of the RL agent is only conducted once and controls for updated parameters can be generated directly from the agent without additional training. In (c), while the initial optimal control has to be found by either GRAPE or RL, subsequent updates can be efficiently done according to Theorem <ref>.
2012.13377
fig1.jpg
0.470639
560713626ff84cb49b59e4c67e1c0c7f
Classical CR bound as a function of t in (a) Example 1 and (b) Example 2. The target time T=5. The parameters are (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4) in Example 1 and (ω_1,ω_2,g)=(1.0,1.2,0.1) in Example 2. The dashed black curves show the results without control. The solid blue curves show the results from RL. The dash-dotted green curves and the dotted orange curves represent results obtained by GRAPE with the steepest gradient ascent (GRAPE-GD) and Adam (GRAPE-Adam) methods, respectively. For GRAPE, the initial guess of the control is zero in Example 1 and the initial guess is random in Example 2.
2012.13377
fig10.jpg
0.451018
65b75a5d5d1c4a909cb58b7395f46b01
Plot of (T)^-1 as a function of the target time T in (a) Example 1 with (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4) and (b) Example 2 with (ω_1,ω_2,g)=(1.0,1.2,0.1). Diamonds on the blue lines show results obtained by RL. Stars located at each T are GRAPE results from Ref. <cit.>. The dashed black curves show the value without control. The solid black curves represent the optimal precision limit 4T/3 under unitary dynamics.
2012.13377
fig11.jpg
0.463911
da4857ddc9f745e2a2ac89b9673dc0bc
(a) Generalizability regarding the strength of the magnetic field in Example 1. Here evaluated at the target time T=5 is shown as a function of B' in [B-2π/T,B+2π/T] where B=1. The RL agent is trained at (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4) and the dephasing rate γ=0.2, which is subsequently used to generate control pulses for B' under dephasing rates γ=0.1 (upper panel) and γ=0.4 (lower panel). (b) Generalizability regarding individual magnetic fields in Example 2. The CR bounds evaluated at the target time T=5 are shown as a function of ω_1' with fixed ω_2=1.2 and coupling strength g=0.1. The RL agent is trained at (ω_1,ω_2,g)=(1.0,1.2,0.1) and dephasing rates γ_1,2=0.1, which are subsequently used to generate control pulses for a range of ω_1' under dephasing rates γ_1,2=0.05 (upper panel) and γ_1,2=0.2 (lower panel). The dashed gray curves show the CR bound without control for comparison.
2012.13377
fig12.jpg
0.49796
f1495e4f5455417b917c9e49d4a1da81
Schematics of the reinforcement learning framework. At the jth time step, the RL agent observes the current state as the density matrix ρ_j≡ρ(jΔ t) and takes an action as the control on the system. As a consequence, the state evolves to a new one at the (j+1)th time step while the agent receives an immediate reward. After completing one episode, the state is reset to the probe state.
2012.13377
fig2.jpg
0.439289
f9cd30a6e43a44cab5bfde6915d6a6e9
(a) Generalizability for the strength of the magnetic field in Example 1. For RL, we show at the target time T=5 as a function of B' in [B-2π/T,B+2π/T] where B=1. We use the neural networks that are trained at (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4) to generate the pulse sequences for B'. The blue crosses show the results of RL. The red squares represent the results using new pulse sequences optimized by GRAPE. The solid dark blue (red) curve show the analytical results using the pulse sequences found by RL (GRAPE) at (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4). The dashed gray curve shows the CR bound without control. (b) Representative pulse profiles obtained with RL. The cyan lines show the results of B'=B. The purple lines show the results of B'=B+2π/T. (c) Representative pulse profiles obtained with GRAPE. The red lines show the results of B'=B. The brown lines show the results of B'=B+2π/T.
2012.13377
fig3.jpg
0.425338
871dbc4569304ad3a2be0c578df4b7ed
Generalizability for the direction of the magnetic field in Example 1. The strength of the magnetic field is fixed as B=1. (a) Pseudo-color-plots showing the CR bound at the target time T=5 as a function of the parameters (ϑ',φ') in the plane [0,π]×[0,2π]. Note that the color bar has a logarithmic scale. Shown on the left is the CR bound using the analytical scheme. Shown on the right is the CR bound under controls generated by RL using the policy network trained at (B,ϑ,φ)=(1,π/4,π/4), the location of which is denoted by a blue circle. Two cuts (shown as blue dashed lines) correspond to the results in (b) and (c). (b) The CR bound as a function of φ' at fixed ϑ'=0.25π. (c) The CR bound as a function of ϑ' at fixed φ'=0.25π.
2012.13377
fig4.jpg
0.397157
809eebe24e6a4519bf007316aff04394
Generalizability for the individual magnetic fields in Example 2. The ZZ-coupling strength is fixed at g=0.1. (a) The CR bound as a function of ω_2' at fixed ω_1'=1.0. (b) The CR bound as a function of ω_1' at fixed ω_2'=1.2.
2012.13377
fig5.jpg
0.449926
6e985892c67940d9a5d1057b1557a1fe
(a) Generalizability for the magnetic field using only the local controls σ_x^(1), σ_y^(1), σ_x^(2) and σ_y^(2). We show at the target time T=5 as a function of ω_1' in [1.0-π/T,1.0+π/T]. The other parameters are fixed at ω_2'=1.2 and g=0.1. (b) Lack of generalizability for the ZZ-coupling strength. For RL, we show at the target time T=5 as a function of g' in [0.1-π/T,0.1+π/T]. The magnetic fields ω_1'=1.0 and ω_2'=1.2.
2012.13377
fig6.jpg
0.419698
96d3f1cbe6ac475b8072ddd7864677c3
Performance of RL using different ranges of action space. We show the value of as a function of the range u_m where |u_a^(i)|⩽ u_m. The other parameters are T=5 and Δ t=0.1. The same random seed is used. The black dashed and red dotted horizontals are the CR bound without control in Examples 1 and 2, respectively.
2012.13377
fig7.jpg
0.398933
3aa8e83197274c27b1381620077e7eae
Training processes of RL in (a) Example 1 and (b) Example 2. Here T=5 and Δ t=0.1. Blue marks represent results from a total of 2000 RL episodes with replay memory size 10 000, green marks correspond to a training involving 10 000 RL episodes with replay memory size 20 000, and red marks represent 20 000 RL episodes with replay memory size 100 000.
2012.13377
fig8.jpg
0.41082
0df8e56ac3664a56b5fab7c9d65aefce
Time complexity of different methods. The x axis shows the system size, i.e., the number of time slices N. The y axis shows the wall-clock time cost in seconds. Diamonds on the blue line show the time cost in one RL training episode. Squares on the red line and circles on the black line are the times required by one iteration of GRAPE with and without storing the superoperators, respectively. Notice that the base-10 logarithmic scale is used for both axes.
2012.13377
fig9.jpg
0.480477
baf64704995949d88d6a8eba868aab8e
2012.13380
graph_confidence_deterministic.jpg
0.587129
06edadb3ee5d4825944f2e904f7cab2b
2012.13380
graph_confidence_fair.jpg
0.438081
46c2715900a144c0a02d5e8682db9d6d
2012.13380
graph_ratio.jpg
0.411692
18fcf637184f46d2b457fbb1dc9ed636
Phase diagram of MSK model: the left and right one are expected for and ^2 respectively. The green shaded region corresponds to RS regime proved in Theorem <ref> and <ref>. The expected RSB phase is labelled in both cases. In both pictures, the red curve and blue curve correspond to ^2 ρ(^2)=1 and ^2max_∈spec('^2)()=1 respectively. The right picture for ^2 is based on the evidence from some examples, see Example <ref>.
2012.13381
combine_phase_v1-3.jpg
0.481746
543cf442d25641aa89af4e685c6ea99b
An example episode of high CAPE and substantial CAPE error: 5 days from May 24th to 28th, 2012 over Topeka, Kansas, color coded as usual. Reanalyses and model are shown at 6-hourly; IGRA soundings are every 12 hours (an additional records at 27th 18 UTC). Vertical lines mark the two examples discussed in text. CAPE biases arise from underestimated specfic humidity: in ERA renalyses on May 26 because T is low despite accurate RH, and in WRF on both May 26 and 27 because conditions are too dry even though temperature is high.
2012.13383
Figure10episode.jpg
0.400548
a9067a0463a3441c8d43288fc656a93b
The diurnal cycle in T–H space in all datasets. Color code follows the convention throughout this work. (Left) The example of Figure <ref>. Thick lines connect 00 UTC (right end) and 12 UTC (left end) values on the day of high CAPE error (May 26th 2012), with time of maximum error marked with 'x'. Faint lines connect 6-hourly values in reanalyses and model over the full 5-day period. (Right) Mean summertime diurnal cycles. Lines connect mean of 00 UTC and 12 UTC points for each dataset, for all profiles (dot-dashed), and for high-CAPE (solid) and low-CAPE (dotted) subsets, defined as 00 UTC SBCAPE values above 90th / below 10th percentile in each dataset, and values 12 hours later. In all cases the IGRA diurnal cycle involves flat or slightly increasing H; the WRF cycle decreasing H; and the ERA cycles too low humidity and too small a daytime T rise in high CAPE conditions.
2012.13383
Figure11slopecolumn.jpg
0.424748
7dab7cd36bcf4650b9d54a4b05d582c1
Comparison of SBCAPE and MUCAPE for all datasets, using all soundings considered. Data is binned by SBCAPE value, and we exclude values under 200 J/kg. (Left) Mean ratio of MUCAPE over SBCAPE, and (right) mean of ratio of the most unstable pressure level over surface pressure. Note that y axes are log scale. For both CAPE and pressure level, the ratio approaches 1.0 as CAPE increases: in higher CAPE conditions, the most unstable level is closer to the surface.
2012.13383
Figure1ratiomusb.jpg
0.444194
df34dfdbb1ad444db869f864bb634051
Probability density functions (top row) and quantile ratio plots (bottom row) of CAPE from reanalysis (ERAI and ERA5), high-resolution model output (WRF), and radiosonde observations (IGRA) for MJJA 2001-2012, with times and locations matched to IGRA observations. Points with zero CAPE are excluded (36-40% of datasets, see Table <ref>). Left column shows full distribution and right column the high tail (90th percentile and above). For IGRA, the 90th percentile is ∼2800 J/kg, the 95th ∼3200 J/kg, the 97.5th ∼4000 J/kg. In PDFs (top), plots are cut off at 6000 J/kg on the x-axis, omitting less than 0.1% of all points. The most extreme values are: IGRA (6834 J/kg), ERAI (5198), ERA5 (6291), WRF (7294). In quantile ratio plots (bottom), a slope downward to the right indicates a narrower distribution. Model and reanalyses consistently underpredict CAPE values in this high tail.
2012.13383
Figure2distsbcape.jpg
0.442276
fe35c63952d544af8de09eeb6e4d1d3c
As Figure <ref>, but for MUCAPE instead of SBCAPE. Points with zero CAPE are excluded from the analysis (23-35% of the datasets, see Table <ref>). We match the time and locations of model output to IGRA observations. PDF x-axes are cut off at 6000 J/kg, as less than 0.4% of all points lie above the limit. For IGRA, the 90th percentile is about 3360 J/kg, the 95th percentile ∼4000 J/kg, and the 97.5th percentile ∼4540 J/kg.
2012.13383
Figure3distmucape.jpg
0.459233
f2dd5ebdcbf44fe388b1154292d935e6
Snapshot of WRF simulation output at 00 UTC, July 21st, 2012. Panel colors show SBCAPE, 2 m temperature, and specific humidity. Ocean values are masked out. Circles show IGRA stations, with circle area showing the magnitude of bias in each variable and color indicating its sign (red = high, green = low). Note the low CAPE bias in the Central U.S. associated with too hot and too dry model conditions. Sounding marked “X” may also be affected by errors in the location of the warm front.
2012.13383
Figure4snapshot2012072100.jpg
0.43014
87b6e227883e49c9b750ddeb058616d2
Comparison of SBCAPE in WRF and radiosonde observations, for all points during summer (MJJA) 2001-2012 when observations are available, inclusive of zeroes. Color bar shows log density (midpoint color is 1% of all observations), and both axes are also log scale. (Top left) Raw data, showing wide scatter. Other panels: Recalculated WRF CAPE using (top right) observed surface temperature, (bottom left) observed surface humidity, and (bottom right) all surface values from observations. All recalculated CAPE values also involve a pressure correction whose effects are small. For analogous figures for ERAI and ERA5, see Supplementary Figures S4–S5.
2012.13383
Figure5calibrationdensity.jpg
0.456945
b61dcba13c1c4ac0b5fd5004239d21f0
Mean radiosonde observed SBCAPE in surface temperature and specific humidity parameter space, for the entire dataset: summer (MJJA) 2001–2012 over the contiguous U.S., inclusive of all launch times and of zero values. Colors denote mean CAPE values averaged in bins of 3 K and 1.35 g/kg. Solid and dashed lines mark conditions of 100% and 50% relative humidity. Symbols '+' and 'x' mark two cases ('warm' and 'hot') used in Figure <ref>. Contours show approximate limits for 2000 and 4000 J/kg SBCAPE for all datasets with no surface corrections applied: IGRA (black), ERAI (blue), ERA5 (green), and WRF (red). Similarity of contours means that all datasets show similar bivariate distributions. See Supplementary Figure S6 for full density distributions for all datasets.
2012.13383
Figure6heatmapmeancape.jpg
0.466274
6a4a7d2bdbe54da89a6db29b03a13654
Comparison of SBCAPE in all datasets for specified T–H grid cell: the `Warm' example is centered at 298.5 K and 12.825 g/kg (63.4% RH), and has mean SBCAPE 810 J/kg; the `Hot' example is at 307.5 K and 16.875 g/kg (48.7% RH) with mean SBCAPE 3270 J/kg. Each bin is 3 K in width, and 1.35 g/kg in height. Top row shows uncorrected SBCAPE from reanalyses and model, and bottom corrected with IGRA surface values. Note that since the correction involves adjusting surface T and H, the profiles sampled in top and bottom rows are different. The `warm' bin has 390 profiles in the uncorrected data and 480 in the corrected, while `hot' has 2300 and 2111, respectively. Tickmarks at panel top show the mean of each distribution. Distributions are very similar; correcting surface values only slightly adjusts means (from a maximum bias of -5% in uncorrected data to -2% after correction).
2012.13383
Figure7binsdistribution.jpg
0.470274
fa77ba1e23594be3b48b4aa147c2d7bd
(Top left) Density of observed surface conditions in temperature – specific humidity parameter space at 12 UTC (early morning in the contiguous U.S.), again for 2001-2012 MJJA radiosonde observations. Contours are repeated from Figure <ref> to mark conditions associated with 2000 and 4000 J/kg SBCAPE. Darkest blue color shown is 5.6%–6.4% of distribution; lightest is 0–0.8%. Grids with no more than three samples are defined as outliers and removed (only 0.03% of all model or reanalysis samples). Nighttime and early morning conditions are tightly distributed in relative humidity (RH ∼80%) and tend to be relatively cool (T < 300 K), with almost no conditions sampled that would tend to produce SBCAPE >2000 J/kg. (Other panels) – heatmaps of density differences between models and observations for (clockwise from top left) ERA5, ERAI, and WRF. Color scale shows fractional difference after normalizing each bin by IGRA raw density. Orange = undersampling and purple = oversampling. Reanalysis and model all underestimate relative humidities (orange near the RH=100% contour) and WRF shows a strong warm dry bias (dark purple in lower right).
2012.13383
Figure8heatmap12utc.jpg
0.444493
c66b9f7ba0a64a55972c46cdbe95b730
As in Figure <ref>, but for 00 UTC (late afternoon / early evening in the contiguous U.S.) (Top left) Density of observed surface conditions in T–H diagram. At this time period the density distribution peaks in conditions associated with 2000–4000 J/kg CAPE. Darkest blue color shown is 2.1%–2.4% of distribution; lightest is 0–0.3%. (Other panels) Density differences between renalyses / model and radiosondes. ERA5 and ERAI undersample both the highest relative humidities and the highest temperatures (orange near the RH=100% contour and on the right side), while WRF shows a warm dry bias (purple in lower right). Reanalyses and model all severely undersample the conditions associated with extreme CAPE (orange in upper right).
2012.13383
Figure9heatmap0utc.jpg
0.425516
a9193fc175094dd5a18b68429729fcea
Hierarchical model view for Gaussian process
2012.13384
hieGP.jpg
0.450878
933f00e194104eee80fef3339b4bb1e7
Hierarchical model view for spatial sequence with corrupted class labels y
2012.13384
hieSTSequence.jpg
0.405939
49d762d19cd940a980ef05dceac515e4
Illustration of geographically weighted model based on kernel function (source of image:<cit.>)
2012.13384
kernels.jpg
0.506175
8d8f553c5a624a6587c88251c71f3d23
Spatial operations on raster data (map algebra)
2012.13384
mapalgebra.jpg
0.402682
3cfeef5119ed4194965ae9610c0c977a
A taxonomy of spatial prediction methods
2012.13384
taxonomy.jpg
0.435136
d83ad104787c47f4a093332b46effdb2
2012.13385
fig_te.jpg
0.453933
b6ba7de0db0c43079740fcaf85782bd1
3D-rendition (a) and sectional view (b) of the modified single-cell 650-MHz superconducting resonator.
2012.13388
Figure1OverViewSetup.jpg
0.456417
55cff6c7b1b6474b8fe2e0021971638f
Relative shift in the resonant frequency (a) and maximum axial electric field Ê_̂ẑ as a function of the stem length and two radii ϱ (b).
2012.13388
Figure2FreqShift.jpg
0.532288
9dde6e43087d44e8a89c6fa7a68ba63e
Geometry and associated peak-normalized electric (r>0) and magnetic (r<0) fields associated with the Full-cell (a), half-cell (b) and modified field-enhanced resonator (c). The corresponding on-axis axial electric field E_z(r=0,z) (blue) and surface magnetic field B(θ=0,z) (red) are respectively displayed in (d),(e) and (f). In (f) the thin (resp. thick) red trace corresponds to the surface magnetic field on the cavity-wall (resp. rod) surface.
2012.13388
Figure3CompareModels.jpg
0.431193
0958131241fa4fe5bc9c8e8025c50671
Evolution of the maximum temperature at the cathode-rod extremity during the iterative simulations (a) and temperature dependence of the surface resistance R_s (b) used in the thermal simulation. The red and blue traces correspond respectively to the case of Nb (red) and Nb_3Sn.
2012.13388
Figure4Temp_final.jpg
0.471433
d9df4f31806b46c183a20d9c828cdc34
Steady-state temperature map (a) and associated peak-normalized electric- (upper plane r>0) and magnetic- (lower plane r<0) field amplitudes (b) for the FE configuration with optimized conical rod.
2012.13388
Figure5ThermalModel.jpg
0.495287
65b00071e49b49328ac263ccfc554798
On-axis axial electric field E_z(r=0) (solid traces) and kinetic energy K (dashed lines) in the FE (red) and HC (blue) configurations (a) and radial component of the electric field E_r (z=) (right). The dashed black line represent the radius of the rod (5 mm). The electromagnetic fields are normalized to the same dissipated power for comparison.
2012.13388
Figure6Energygain.jpg
0.434243
eeb1791d3a884ed5bc707547210b3473
Pareto fronts between transverse emittance and bunch duration associated with the multi-objective optimizations for the HC and FE configurations. The colors represent beam brightness B. The inset (b) displays a zoomed portion of the FE plot.
2012.13388
Figure7OptResults.jpg