dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.472469 | 930136985847471abf73eaedbc4306f8 | The parameters A,B and C appearing in the coarse-grained Cahn-Hilliard equation (<ref>) as a function of the Deborah number (for β=0.769). | nlin0602005 | ABCbw.jpg |
0.476725 | f7f645fb86f048d6955bf93f95dc4933 | The generalized Cahn–Hilliard equation reproduces the dynamics of the Oldroyd-B model around the critical point P^*. As in figure <ref>, the thicker lines are DNS simulations while the thinner ones are CH simulations. This comparison was realized for =1.62 and =2.5159. | nlin0602005 | CHGEN.jpg |
0.481358 | b5c6b67d5d3247afa7715d7985280dd6 | The comparison between DNS simulations of the Oldroyd–B model and the coarse-grained Cahn–Hilliard equation derived in the body of the text. The thicker lines represent the evolution of the lowest-energy modes in a DNS simulation, while the thinner lines are the result of a CH simulation. Its dynamical parameters have been set with the results obtained in section <ref>. This particular figure refers to a simulation with =1.4, β=0.769 and /_c-1=0.14. | nlin0602005 | ch-dns-de1.4.jpg |
0.557409 | 5322c31c08d147d7a2776d914e7982ec | The energy associated to the lowest wavenumber modes resulting from a CH simulation. The values of the coefficients have been arbitrarily chosen for conveniency of display. The quasi-stationary states can be clearly seen up to the asymptotic one corresponding to the largest periodicity. In this simulation, =1.4 and /_c-1=0.28. | nlin0602005 | ch_dynamics.jpg |
0.460719 | 5c350b1b277a4cdaae301e57a492bb9f | The “generalized” (solid) and “standard” (dotted) kinks for λ=1/2 and γ=10/9. The former has a manifestly shorter range. It is shown in the body of the text that this entails longer time-scales for their annihilation with the corresponding anti-kinks. | nlin0602005 | kinkGEN.jpg |
0.472179 | d96a468c29ca45debff6f03a5437c4bc | The potentials associated to the different evolution equation. Curve a is related to the standard Cahn–Hilliard equation (fourth-order potential); curve b represents the generalized Cahn–Hilliard equation (sixth-order potential). Curve c is the characteristic triple-well potential of the purely nonlinearly unstable case. The plots are in arbitrary units, to ease the comparison between the curves. | nlin0602005 | pot.jpg |
0.470787 | bac256845e174fd2873068b5f3098854 | The linear stability diagram for β=0.769. Stable and unstable regions are denoted by S and U, respectively. The bullets represent direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the complete Oldroyd-B system of equations, confirming theoretical predictions for this window of parameters. | nlin0602005 | stab_DNS.jpg |
0.467405 | c794579c7157473d89c24b53e459bd6a | Growth rates g of the transverse Fourier modes k for a simulation with =1.4 and β=0.769. The simulations are performed in a rectangular domain with aspect ratio 1/64. The distance to the critical point /_c-1 is 0.28. The solid line represents the linear prediction (<ref>). The circles representing the numerically computed growth rates have been obtained with a DNS simulation by a linear fit of the logarithm of the energy for each mode versus time, in the early stages of their exponential growth. | nlin0602005 | tassicrescita-DE1.4.jpg |
0.398959 | 13f5a32ec4074fb0a934b07b41307012 | The drag coefficient f plotted versus the Deborah number at constant . As the polymer elasticity grows, the drag coefficient diminishes. This implies that the mean flow grows with . | nlin0602005 | teo_DR.jpg |
0.419458 | 47cc97ae6f62409b9d0adf5b019ac15a | The phase-space around the critical point P^* where both the eddy-viscosity and the coefficient of the third-order nonlinearity change sign. The region is divided in four regions schematically sketched here by the two critical curves A=0 and B=0. The former is found from the linear stability analysis in section 3. The latter is found locally, around the A=0 curve, by solving (<ref>), and is linearly extrapolated for graphical purposes as a dashed line. For β=0.769, the curve B=0 is inclined at approximately 60^∘ with respect to the axis. | nlin0602005 | zoneCHG.jpg |
0.504434 | 3ca7d47dbf8043e492bd5cfe34af13b4 | The schematic figure of the contact angle setup. | nlin0602008 | angolo.jpg |
0.428111 | 244789890549424580b5e044b12c06d6 | Results obtained from the mechanical stability conditions (<ref>), □, and thermodynamic coexistence curve (<ref>), ∘, for liquid and gas densities. The results of numerical simulation are also reported (×). The numerical simulations are carried out in a fully periodic 2d setup with grid mesh L_x× L_y=90× 90 and a relaxation time τ=1. The system is then initiated to have a flat interface along the x direction. The top branch refer to the liquid density, ρ_l, while the bottom branch to the gas density, ρ_g. | nlin0602008 | comp.jpg |
0.414832 | 95b81324a76c4ceeba32d08395a08ef9 | Surface tension as a function of the interaction parameter _b. The surface tension calculated using both expressions in equation (<ref>), the case with ∂_y ρ (∘) and the case with ∂_y ψ (□). To show the importance of the normalization factor (<ref>) we also show the surface tension calculated by simply replacing ∂_y ψ→∂_y ρ in (<ref>), (filled squares). | nlin0602008 | comparisonSF.bis.jpg |
0.430281 | f73d7cf0971c4cf89e47cfb3ca7e8ef6 | Contact angle for the case _b=-6.0 as a function of ρ_w. The analytical estimate is compared with the experimental results of Lattice Boltzmann simulations (+). The Lattice Boltzmann simulations are carried out in a 2d domain periodic along the stream-wise direction and with two walls (upper and lower wall). The grid mesh used is L_x× L_y=80× 45 and the relaxation time chosen is τ=1. To produce the steady state with a drop of liquid the system has been initialized with a non-homogeneous condition with a square spot of liquid on the lower wall. | nlin0602008 | contactangleGw=0.jpg |
0.473689 | 5a05b80ad9364bddb23fdb96b935f0a8 | Left: typical density profile from which we extract the contact angle. The contact angle in the numeric is extracted by estimating the angle made by the surface where the density profile is equal to the average value (ρ_l-ρ_g)/2 being ρ_l=2.65 and ρ_g=0.07 for the present case with _b=-6.0. The computational parameters are the same used for figure <ref>. To produce the three phases equilibrium the system has been initialized to a non-homogeneous condition with a a square spot of liquid in contact with the lower wall. Right: a vertical snapshot of the left panel for x=45. | nlin0602008 | contactangleNUM.jpg |
0.413331 | f84672e4ffaa49dab8574680fe0fd0f9 | The stationary state configuration for the density field as a function of the relative distance from the wall. We present the density field normalized to the center channel density for two different values of the average density of the system: ρ= 1.1 ρ_l (□) and ρ = 0.7 ρ_l (∘). In both cases we integrate numerically the Lattice Boltzmann Equation with τ=1 in a 2d channel with two walls (bottom and lower) and periodic boundary condition in the stream-wise direction. The dimensions of the channel are L_x× L_y=80× 45 and _b=-6.0, being _c=-4.0 the critical point of the system. The liquid and gas density for this value are respectively ρ_l=2.65 and ρ_g=0.07 in Lattice Boltzmann units. Notice that the density tends to match a given value at the wall (for y/L_y=0) which is different from both liquid and gas values, this is because of the chosen boundary condition, ψ(ρ_w=0.5). | nlin0602008 | figdensity.jpg |
0.499125 | 09a2e13c256d4cf0bc52ad56f0f68610 | Surface tensions in a 3 phase system for _b=-6.0 as a function of ρ_w. The horizontal line represents the surface tension between liquid and gas (γ_lg). The surface tension between solid and gas (γ_sg) is zero for ρ_w=ρ_g=0.07 and equal to γ_lg for ρ_w= ρ_l = 2.65. The surface tension between liquid and solid (γ_ls) reflects the opposite behavior. | nlin0602008 | figuretension.jpg |
0.547382 | 8ec64d58cf884f2c89876874c858cb6d | Velocity profiles for pressure driven Stokes flow. Profiles are obtained integrating numerically the Stokes equation for unit pressure drop and kinematic viscosity (<ref>) in a homogeneous (in the stream wise direction) channel with an height L=50 grid points. The profiles are then normalized with respect to the center channel velocity of the Poiseuille flow (u^p_c) for the same geometry. From top to bottom we show different values of ρ_w corresponding to different contact angles: ρ_w=0.13 (θ=166^∘), ρ_w=0.27 (θ=145^∘), ρ_w=0.49 (θ=110^∘). | nlin0602008 | velocityprofile.jpg |
0.448385 | 2811a34622764614bbd37fbf74398dbe | Numerical simulation corresponding to a layer of CO_2 with thickness d=0.052 cm, pressure P=316 psi, mean temperature T_0=27.3^o C, Prandtl number Pr=0.87, and control parameter ϵ=0.3 (cf. Fig.<ref>). The size of the integration domain is L=8· 2 π/q_c=16.11 and the boundary conditions are periodic. As initial condition a perfect hexagon lattice with wavenumber q_c=3.12 has been used. a) corresponds to t=0, b) to t=18t_v, and c) to t=60t_v. fig:perio-co2 | nlin0602012 | R2193-a-b-c-2.jpg |
0.525442 | 8a74b89a71a446dba064c2ec68731517 | Stability regions for hexagons in CO_2 with respect to amplitude (dashed line) and side-band perturbations (solid line) for layer depth d=0.08 cm, pressure P=300 psi, mean temperature T_0=40 ^oC, and Prandtl number Pr=0.84. The NB coefficients γ_i^c are reported in Tab. <ref>. Hexagons are stable with respect to amplitude perturbations outside the dashed-line region, and stable with respect to side-band perturbation inside the solid-line region.fig:side-co2 | nlin0602012 | artico2-To40.jpg |
0.41249 | 6ebc4fd426a1406e87d1345334aa00be | Correlation between the arclength and the winding number of spiral arms under OB (black squares) and NB conditions (red circles). fig:corr-arc-winding | nlin0602012 | corr-arc-winding_SF6-OB-NB.jpg |
0.413172 | feeaa3bd291946dfaf46bacab4b827d8 | Joint distribution function for the contour length and the compactness of closed contours for H_2-Xe (Pr=0.17, ϵ=0.3). fig:corr-cont-compt-h2xe. | nlin0602012 | corr-cont-comp.MaRi05a.f18-d.jpg |
0.441386 | f3bb6de71a744739bc9e7beb99746a28 | Stability limits with respect to sideband perturbations in a mixture of H_2-Xe with molar fraction χ=0.4, thickness d=0.1 cm, pressure P=300 psi, mean temperature T_0=80 ^oC, and Prandtl number Pr=0.17. The NB coefficients are γ_0=0.5535, γ_1=-0.6421, γ_2=0.9224, γ_3=0.3647, γ_4=-0.0712 resulting in Q=13.8. Hexagons are stable in the regions enclosed by the solid lines and unstable outside. The dashed line represents the neutral curve. The results for H_2-Xe are obtained with n_z=6 and n_q=5 fig:side-h2xe. | nlin0602012 | h2xe-to80.jpg |
0.528591 | bec511a4d48945aab7b1cd610116a204 | Typical pattern for convection in H_2-Xe at ϵ=0.3. fig:pattern-h2xe. | nlin0602012 | h2xe.snap.001401-sqrt.jpg |
0.46171 | 0a8224439b9b40d2a03a0ae36b8c6dfc | Direct numerical simulation of equations (<ref>-<ref>) for SF_6 in a cell of thickness d=0.0542 cm, pressure P=140 psi, mean temperature T_0=80^oC, Prandtl number Pr=0.8, and control parameter ϵ=1.4. The cell has size L=16· 2 π/q_c=32.22 with periodic boundary conditions. Starting from random initial conditions both snapshots are taken at t=160 t_v. Left panels for OB conditions (γ_i=0, i=0..4, left), right panels for NB conditions appropriate for T_0=80^oC (cf. Fig<ref>b). Bottom panels give the corresponding contour lines used for the pattern diagnostics. fig:sf6-nb-ob | nlin0602012 | sf6-nb-ob-4-sqrt.jpg |
0.478322 | 92410bf869bb41df831068bb0f77da59 | Stability regions for hexagons in CO_2 with respect to side-band perturbations for layer thickness d=0.052 cm, pressure P=300 psi, mean temperature T_0=27^o C, and Prandtl Pr=0.86. The NB coefficients are γ_0^c=0.2053, γ_1^c= -0.2877, γ_2^c=0.3267, γ_3^c=0.1152, and γ_4^c=-0.086. The hexagons are stable with respect to side-band perturbations in the region inside the solid lines and unstable outside. The dashed line corresponds to the neutral curve. fig:side-to27 | nlin0602012 | side-to27-co2.jpg |
0.480628 | 3f3c719fb31942838aed219418ce423a | Integration contour in the complex plane. | nlin0602013 | fig1.jpg |
0.475361 | a89da809003745e28c5074449c346a5d | Plot of the scaling function ω(τ) | nlin0602013 | fig2.jpg |
0.454135 | 7fa86a6ad67a4e5cadaffaa0f221ddf0 | Probability density function of the first passage times. The statistics for different initial conditions, indicated in the legend, is collected from 5·10^6 realization of the Langevin equation corresponding to eq. (<ref>). A t^-5/2 power law is also shown for reference. | nlin0602013 | fig3.jpg |
0.503897 | 8635c4ec962b402898cf23ab15dd5aa9 | (a) Number of quanta N vs parameter λ=Λ/α^2 for solitons (n=0,m=0) and vortex solitons (n=0,m=1, 2) (solid curves for variational and circles for numerical results). Numerically found profiles for (b) λ=0.05; (c) λ=0.5; (d) λ=5. Solid curves for ψ'(r')=ψ/α dashed curves for θ'(r')=θ/α^2; the scaled coordinates r'=α r are used. | nlin0602016 | fig1.jpg |
0.459791 | e1cc4f9e9e594717aeb86b100695bef3 | (a) The dependence of the dipole amplitude A on λ): solid curve - variational analysis; dashed curve - direct numerical simulation. (b) Dipole distance d and the width β^-1 v. s. λ (variational analysis) | nlin0602016 | fig10.jpg |
0.483479 | cc97e0fc36a844e4b7153e23b110129a | (a) Number of quanta N vs parameter λ=Λ/α^2 for higher-order solitons (m=0, n=1,2). Radial profiles for (b) λ=0.05; (c) λ=0.5; (d) λ=5. Solid curves for ψ' dashed curves for θ'. | nlin0602016 | fig2.jpg |
0.468557 | b416c8ac5768409680f8d55bc0a3b9bc | (Color online) The scaled growth rate γ=Imω/α^2 of linear perturbation modes vs the parameter λ=Λ/α^2 for the vortices with (a) m=1 and (b) m=2, the inset depicts the growth rates of the high-L modes in more details. The numbers near the curves stand for the azimuthal mode numbers L. | nlin0602016 | fig3.jpg |
0.389486 | b75da8a0270148208d801e604d27f070 | Snapshots of |Ψ'(x',y')| for different z'. (a) Example of unstable evolution of single-charge (m=1, n=0) vortex soliton with λ=4. (b) Dynamics with revival of the non-spinning (m=0) one-node (n=1) soliton at λ=35. | nlin0602016 | fig4.jpg |
0.45176 | 171a847d0d8f41d3919eef77574d2afc | The dipole solution ψ'=ψ/α for λ≡Λ/α^2=40; the scaled coordinates x'=α x and y'=α y are used. | nlin0602016 | fig5.jpg |
0.423625 | 4cc32856c5384750823fcc9324ac3502 | (Color online) Evolution of the dipole solution with λ=400 in the presence of strong initial random perturbation; the scaled variables x'=α x,y'=α y and z'=α^2z are used. | nlin0602016 | fig7.jpg |
0.451671 | 95f5198d7efc4dab96d9bf74550205da | The doubled energy of the soliton (monopole) 2N_mon (solid line) and the energy of the dipole N_dip (dashed line) v. s. the parameter λ=Λ/α^2. | nlin0602016 | fig8.jpg |
0.486561 | 58043fe0a9474e0ba6fc27154e00e840 | Contour maps of the function ℒ(β,μ) : (a) λ=40; (b) λ=7.6 | nlin0602016 | fig9.jpg |
0.469328 | a0e5d4728f7544fe89aa561dbd924d67 | A selection of eigenvector components α_xl^μ as functions of x, for a few choices of U. | nlin0602020 | evecs.jpg |
0.488939 | 615100c5a3bc4412a22e1e1578bc135e | rate of momentum increase on an initially homogeneous wavefunction for a=0.3, as a function of potential strength U, assuming the form of Eq. (<ref>) for the potential. | nlin0602020 | force.jpg |
0.458831 | 1b13cf4f70b1484485a06d840d46dee5 | Floquet eigenvalues ω_x_0^μ as functions of x_0 for four choices of potential strength U. There appears a level crossing at x≈ 0.4 for U=3.3 which disappears again for larger U; this signals a sharp feature in the curve for the force F in Fig. <ref>. Because of periodicity, only the range 0<x<π/2 is displayed. | nlin0602020 | freqs.jpg |
0.458248 | e95d0d7b272140f3b77fc588148f2d34 | Floquet eigenvalues ω_x_0^μ as functions of x_0 for four choices of potential strength U. | nlin0602020 | freqs2.jpg |
0.438931 | 7b8c13c21b6748618be007ef7c3bc644 | Oscillation dynamics of the mRNA concentrations of the uncoupled oscillators with the same initial conditions. | nlin0602021 | Fig1.jpg |
0.468463 | cb939a1bb7384d07a44ef02c4ccc7ec8 | Time evolution of Goodwin models with linear coupling. (a)The time evolution of the mRNA concentrations of the oscillators; (b) The time evolution of the synchronization error. | nlin0602021 | Fig2.jpg |
0.44915 | f655a688f0394b9cb26ccc02420cf71a | Time evolution of Goodwin models with Michaelis-Menten coupling. (a)The time evolution of the mRNA concentrations of the oscillators; (b) The time evolution of the synchronization error. | nlin0602021 | Fig3.jpg |
0.450669 | e65926837cf44379a4d8c096a88634d7 | nlin0602028 | fig_2.jpg |
|
0.497237 | 6aab80bd5a944b0e8fdf9dcd8076e7e1 | nlin0602028 | fig_3.jpg |
|
0.477674 | e264e7fd32e649cf8e6bf2eca7644d89 | nlin0602028 | fig_4.jpg |
|
0.480492 | 1e03e042118743f490e90163cd2cbfb9 | nlin0602028 | fig_5.jpg |
|
0.525505 | 859890cf35394c2cab7f087ff9a2f723 | nlin0602028 | fig_6.jpg |
|
0.526939 | 722251eb5f68465eb3e51746c0a6f476 | nlin0602028 | fig_7.jpg |
|
0.472455 | 71b189ee5f1543779aab893e081e1001 | The functions u_i,j(c) and the velocities of solitons. The intersection point between u_i,j and u_k,l gives the velocity of D-soliton [i,j:k,l]. The solid dots give the velocities of D-solitons, and the open circles give the velocities of A-solitons, e.g. the velocity of [1:2]-soliton is c=-(p_1+p_2) which is given by either u_1,4=u_2,4 or u_1,3=u_2,3. | nlin0602031 | 1D-uij.jpg |
0.410572 | 8a92904dc15a4af78712349a915564be | Four A-solitons obtained from the B-matrix of two D-solitons or three D-solitons. Two D-solitons in a) is given by the B-martrix with i=(1,2,3,6) and j=(5,4,7,8). Three D-solitons in b) is given by the B-matrix with i=(1,2,3,5) and j=(8,7,4,6). Both cases have the same p=(-4,-3,-2,-1,1,3,4,6). The four A-soliton solution in c) is given by the B-matrix (<ref>). Note that the B-matrix of (<ref>) gives the same solution. | nlin0602031 | 2-3-4solx.jpg |
0.434437 | 70ccd7d55c694ba194174900d270d788 | The 4-solutions in the right figure is obtained from the B-matrices given by (<ref>). The left figure shows two D-solitons obtained by the same matrix except b_1,7=0,b_2,8=0,b_3,5=0 and b_4,6=0 (note the extra resonant structure at the intesection region of those D-solitons. | nlin0602031 | 2-4solx.jpg |
0.450365 | 4dfa961f862b4c69be9e364f7073b5e8 | Three fundamental types of two A-solitons. Those solutions have the same topological feature as the two soliton solutions of the KP equation (see also Figure 3 in <cit.>). The difference between those solutions appears as the existence of localized solutions v^± (if v^+v^-=0, then the DKP solution is also the KP solution). However note that the TD-type in Figure <ref> does not have a resonant quadrangle. The figures show the counter plots of the function w=(lnτ)_x in the x-y plane for a fixed t, and the contrast of the shades shows the different values of w which increases in the positive x-direction. | nlin0602031 | 2A-TPOx.jpg |
0.483459 | 2fc98a2c8e354ed99cb24931e2296ac6 | Resonant bifurcations of the D-soliton [1,2:3,4]. Each region, (i,j), corresponds to a dominant exponential marked by the element b_i,j. For example, with b_2,3 0, [1,2:3,4]-D-soliton bifurcates into [1:3] and [2:4] A-solitons as y→ -∞ (top figure). Those solitons can be found from Figure <ref>. | nlin0602031 | 2A-solitons.jpg |
0.465443 | 1e9b0ef5e9b24b34aac9b419e4e52d8e | Interaction patterns for two and three D-solitons in Figure <ref>. The function w=(lnτ_2)_x takes the values, w→ (i_1,j_1,i_2,j_2) as x→-∞, and w→(i_3,j_3,i_4,j_4) as x→∞. All six D-solitons in each figure can be identified as the six intersection points of the graphs u_k:=u_i_k,j_k in Figure <ref>. | nlin0602031 | 3Dsol.jpg |
0.474257 | f23c466f2875406f954a4b49b6643254 | Bifurcation of two D-solitons into three solitons with two A-solitons and one D-soliton. The [1,2:5,6]-D-soliton resolves into two A-solitons of [1:5] and [2:6]. D-solitons are expressed as the double lines joined with the double circles. | nlin0602031 | 3solitonx.jpg |
0.420734 | 689f9d39e19241478e9442d4fb699723 | Two and three D-solitons associated with i=(1,2,3,5) and j=(4,7,6,8). The left figure shows two D-solitons with p=(-3,-2,1,2,3,4,5,6). The right one shows three D-solitons with the same parameters except p_8=8. The bottom figures show the graphs of u_i,j(c)=(p_i+p_j)c+p^2_i+p^2_j. The dots in the graphs show the dominant two exponential terms, which determine the asymptotic D-solitons. The squares correspond to the intermediate D-solitons forming the resonant quadrangle, and the triangles correspond to the resonant intermediate solitons from the pairs of three asymptotic solitons as shown in the top figures. | nlin0602031 | 4768-solx.jpg |
0.421233 | 7e94f73ff2364860aec559dac1a77064 | Three fundamental types of two A-solitons obtained from D-soliton. Each diagram provides the relation between B-matrix and the corresponding two-soliton solution, i.e. b_i,j 0 if and only if the pair (i,j) is directly connected in the middle diagram, and [k:l]-soliton implies that the pair (k,l) has no direct connection. For example, in O-type, two A-solitons are labeled [1:2] and [3:4], then we have the middle diagram to show the connections between the numbers in the pairs, i.e. (1,2) and (3,4) are not connected. This diagram implies we have nonzero elements b_1,3,b_1,4,b_2,3 and b_2,4. | nlin0602031 | D-soliton.jpg |
0.445184 | 761623f1102b4cdbbfac1a8af3759b75 | The graphs of u_k(c)=(p_k+p_17-k)c+p_k^2+p_17-k^2 for k=1,…,16. Each open circle of the intersections of two functions u_k corresponds to a D-soliton given by τ_4. For eaxmple, the point for u_1=u_8 corresponds to the D-soliton of [1,16:8,9]. The number of open circles depends on the choice of the parameter p=(p_1,…,p_16). Notice that only u_4 and later u_6 are changed to increase the number of solitons (see the text for the explicit values of p). | nlin0602031 | M16.jpg |
0.435306 | 25024615e8dd469d8d78e08aaa1d39ca | The graphs of u_k(c)=(p_k+p_9-k)c+p_k^2+p_9-k^2 for k=1,…,4. The indices are marked by (i_k,j_k)=(k,9-k) for k=1,…,4. The left figure shows two D-soliton solutions of [1,8:4,5] and [2,7:3,6] with p=(-5,-4,-2,-1,0,3,3.5,7), and the right one shows three D-solitons of [1,8:2,7],[2,7:3,6] and [2,7:4,5] with p=(-5,-3.5,-2,-1,0,3,4,7). Note that only p_2 is changed. | nlin0602031 | case-a.jpg |
0.469479 | ad16e24732534e0eadaba50b55f047e2 | The qualitative graphs of the functions u_k(c)=(p_2k-1+p_2k)c+p_2k-1^2+p_2k^2 for the case (n) in Proposition <ref> which states, e.g. c_1,4<c_1,3<c_1,2. The open circles correspond to two D-solitons of [1,2:5,6] with the velocity c_1,3 and [3,4:7,8] with c_2,4. | nlin0602031 | cij.jpg |
0.472045 | b04c781b16e74fffad4ec94fbca56403 | Bifurcation diagram of the first five branches. Plot of the solution's power vs. the continuation parameter, C. Dotted lines represent unstable regions. Solid lines represent initially stable regions. | nlin0602039 | 1Figure.jpg |
0.42693 | 43085f99309d4148bbaeab58c12f5d6b | Derivative with respect to time of the logarithm of Nu(t), in a homogeneous convective system at Ra = 4.5×10^4 ∼ 30 · Ra_c. The DNS is implemented through a LBE algorithm on a cubic grid with resolution 240^3, as in <cit.>. Horizontal lines, from top to bottom, correspond respectively to values 2λ(0,1), 2λ(1,1), 2λ(0,2), 2λ(0,2) and the zero level. The time, here and in the following figures, is dimensionless as for the set of Eq. (<ref>)-(<ref>), i.e., it has been normalized by the thermal diffusion time across the box, H^2/κ. | nlin0602040 | fig1.jpg |
0.55431 | 939d2e4f5dad4c7487b7534b571f51fb | Linear-Log plot of the spatial rms-value of the three velocity component and the thermal fluctuation in the DNS at resolution 32^3, w_rms (solid), u_rms (dashed), v_rms (dotted). | nlin0602040 | fig2.jpg |
0.49854 | f2880914409b4aed8ef0d12db6e3b0fc | A comparison between floating point (solid) and double precision (dashed) calculations for the root mean squared velocity component w, and u^2+ v^2 ^1/2 versus time, with spatial resolution 32^3 and 2nd order Adams-Bashforth as time marching algorithm. | nlin0602040 | fig3.jpg |
0.473377 | e1e4abfbff184d2cb4eb2dc65ac759d4 | Collision between two bright solitons, ρ=1, β_1=π/12, β_2=π/24. Variables in the figure are dimensionless. | nlin0602044 | dnlsbb.jpg |
0.558409 | de9a7ab6d0964fce93e10a51d4e4139c | A bright soliton of β_2=2π/15 chases a dark soliton of β_1=7π/60, ρ=1. Variables in the figure are dimensionless. | nlin0602044 | dnlsbd.jpg |
0.558492 | 9c8d13728fe443c2b871d207d29204a6 | A dark soliton of β_2=π/6 chases a bright soliton of β_1=π/12, ρ=1. Variables in the figure are dimensionless. | nlin0602044 | dnlsdb.jpg |
0.501025 | b0c74e619c814843a5854b90824171ea | Collision between two dark solitons, ρ=1, β_1=π/15, β_2=π/6. Variables in the figure are dimensionless. | nlin0602044 | dnlsdd.jpg |
0.423696 | db89936aa5fe4c76a310542926b69700 | Typical examples of two-dimensional solitons found from Eq. ( <ref>) with a moderately strong quasi-one-dimensional photonic lattice, corresponding to I_0=5. Panels (a), (b), and (c) show the intensity distribution in the lattice, I_phl(x)=I_0cos ^2( π x/d), for d=π /5, 2π , and 10π, respectively. The two-dimensional intensity field in the respective solitons is shown in panels (d), (e), and (f), and the corresponding intensity profiles in two cross sections of the solitons, along y=0 and x=0, are displayed in panels (g), (h), and (i). | nlin0602052 | Fig1.jpg |
0.491712 | b55425f32fd343ac827a80b26e58c0d2 | The minimum peak intensity, I_p,min, and total power, P_min, necessary for the existence of the two-dimensional solitons, vs. the strength, I_0, of the underlying quasi-one-dimensional lattice. | nlin0602052 | Fig3.jpg |
0.392822 | b5ca62e063c04eda8f0d16196ba1e4af | The maximum value of the boost parameter, Q_x, which generates solitons moving (actually, tilted in the spatial domain) along the x axis, vs. the soliton's peak intensity, I_p, for different value of the strength I_0 of the underlying lattice. For Q_x>Q_max, the application of the boost destroys the soliton. | nlin0602052 | Fig5.jpg |
0.443812 | 9fcf2c2a81654e5095daa9669d098991 | A typical example of destructive collisions between moving solitons, for I_0=5 and I_p=1.78. The velocity vectors of the colliding solitons (shown by arrows in the first panel, in this figure and below) have components Q_x,y=± 0.12. | nlin0602052 | Fig6.jpg |
0.456939 | 44f3154bdf834548a1b3a4c324f7cdcf | Merger of colliding solitons which were set in motion by the boost Q_x=± 0.01, with a finite aiming mismatch in the y direction. In this case, I_0=25 and I_p=83.97. | nlin0602052 | Fig7.jpg |
0.479404 | 3165f6f7f7be4e968b770528378521e2 | Merger of broad (multi-lobed) solitons caused by the head-on collision. The solitons were set in motion by the vertical boost with Q_y=± 0.01. In this case, I_0=5 and I_p=1.786. | nlin0602052 | Fig9.jpg |
0.442332 | dff123b561774c8fa9eed338c089bf73 | Examples of localized surface modes at β =-3 in the array of defocusing waveguides (γ =-1) located at different distances d=0,1,2,3 from the array edge. | nlin0602056 | fig2.jpg |
0.494943 | 5db27046b5f84dc3b9679ee256143167 | Normalized power vs. propagation constant β for the surface modes shown in Fig. 1 located at different distances d=0,1,2,3 from the surface. Black curve corresponds to the discrete soliton in an infinite array. | nlin0602056 | fig3.jpg |
0.437678 | 446c63ea801448d3ba79a0d4ca7c0595 | Examples of stable flat-top localized surface modes at β =-4 in the array of defocusing waveguides (γ =-1) centered between different sites near the edge. | nlin0602056 | fig5.jpg |
0.443866 | 1ec5b05e25e04a9b8c463304e79904be | Examples of localized modes at Δ = 0 and two values of the total power above the threshold: (a,b) P=5 and (c,d) P=10. Solid and dashed curves show the fundamental-frequency (u_n) and second-harmonic (v_n) fields , respectively. | nlin0602057 | fig1.jpg |
0.546882 | 02c54d34f1234745a4544b0cc2529f6f | Transmission coefficient of a plane wave (shown for the fundamental frequency only) after scattering by a nonlinear quadratic defect, for Δ =0 and (a) c_v=1, c_u=0.1, (b) c_v=c_u=1, and (c) c_v=1, c_u=1.99. The case (d) show the asymmetric dependence for Δ =0.5 and c_v=1, c_u=1.7. | nlin0602057 | fig3.jpg |
0.436518 | fcd7388acb664d7e9306ce0b0ddac639 | Top view of the PANDA setup. | nucl | ex0602001-panda_v1_top.jpg |
0.415014 | 395f2ab85e28434199f778b44c3bbcf3 | Etrans distributions for the two studied systems at the three indicated energies. For the abscissa Etrans has been divided by the total mass number of the system (projectile + target), and by the incident energy in MeV/u. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig0bis.jpg |
0.411915 | 192175516a8b485f80423dd7e99a9b8f | Angular distributions of the heaviest QP fragment in the QP frame. The abscissa is the cosine of the angle between the QP direction in the centre of mass system and the Zmax1 fragment direction in the QP frame. The events have been sorted according to the Etrans variable. Most of the heaviest fragments are forward emitted. Xe+Sn system at 80 MeV/u. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig10bis.jpg |
0.427137 | 8342327bda114df497c1c15636012e5a | Temperatures measured as a function of Etrans for residue and multifragment events. Xe+Sn system at 80 MeV/u. The black (resp. open) points correspond to two thermometers: slope parameter of protons (resp. double isotopic ratio method). The error bars are statistical. The transition region is around Etrans/A=1 MeV/u (figure <ref>). | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig15ter.jpg |
0.486495 | 97783a68cd5943d2950283f32b4f914b | Alpha particle centre-of-mass v_par-v_per plots for nine Etrans bins covering the whole Etrans distribution of figure <ref>. Xe+Sn system at 80 MeV/u.The width of each Etrans bin is 100 MeV i.e. 0.4 MeV/u if Etrans is normalized on the total system mass as in figures <ref> and <ref> | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig1bis.jpg |
0.52182 | 056b91968f2242268d0e8b2ac301eec5 | Similar to figure <ref> for the Au + Au 80 MeV/u system but the events have been sorted according to Etrans. Each symbol corresponds to a selected Etrans bin of 0.25 MeV/u width. The fluctuation peak is observed in the bins associated with the open points and to the crosses covering an Etrans/u range from 0.65 to 1.15 MeV/u) in which the bimodality transition has been observed in figure <ref>. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig22bis.jpg |
0.481252 | d5f518a29a8f45f0b2240f09f399ff3d | Charge density distributions for various IMF charges as a function of the parallel velocity to the beam in the c.m. frame in c units. The full and open circles are the distributions for Etrans bins 3 and 9 respectively. They have been normalized for zero velocity. The black squares correspond to the difference between the two previous distributions. For the third bin the events with Z_asym larger than 0.8 have been selected. System Au + Au at 100 MeV/u. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig23bis.jpg |
0.455643 | e4de3edca70b40ab95c048273563c8fc | Similar to figure <ref> but the events selected for the third bin are multifragmentation events (Z_asym lower than 0.2). | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig24bis.jpg |
0.410619 | 6d258b5f031141efa73dd39c03877e0b | Z_asym -Z_max plots for the 9 Etrans bins as it is calculated by the HIPSE event generator. Xe+Sn system at 80 MeV/u. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig25bis.jpg |
0.43467 | 287fc3e17fe145ffb6d1ed7e35d8b963 | Z_asym -Z_QP plots for the 9 Etrans bins as it is calculated by the HIPSE event generator. Xe+Sn system at 80 MeV/u. | nucl | ex0602003-art_mathieu_fig26bis.jpg |
0.645616 | 137facb85a40494cb7de05d084d891c4 | C_x and C_z for K^+ Σ ^∘ for cos( θ _K ) = 0.5. The data are a subset the 2005 CLAS results. The curves are predictions from the Kaon-MAID (solid line, <cit.>) and Janssen (dashed line, <cit.>) isobar models. | nucl | ex0602004-sig5.jpg |
0.455593 | 29ed4b2067604e7ab567d3a8226b5a05 | Measurements of the and cross section in the beam proton energy range 1–3 GeV. The four experimental points below 1.5 GeV are from the present experiment, while the data at 2 GeV and at 2.85 GeV for the reaction are from bubble chamber experiments <cit.>. Dotted lines are predictions of the statistical model <cit.> (phase space and flux factor). Dashed and solid line predictions are with pp FSI from Deloff <cit.> and from Fäldt and Wilkin<cit.> respectively. | nucl | ex0602006-3pifsi.jpg |
0.461605 | 55cb1986b99a45628e512c59434d6862 | The elliptic flow v_2 as a function of N_part measured at midrapidity (), for Au+Au and Cu+Cu at = 200 GeV. The Au+Au and Cu+Cu data are from Ref. <cit.> and <cit.>, respectively. The error bars represent the 1σ statistical errors and the boxes are 90% C.L. systematic errors. | nucl | ex0602008-Fig2.jpg |
0.517599 | 998a18d6bdad4d53a4ba8154574018d3 | Inclusive π^0 cross section for p+p collisions versus the leading π^0 energy (E_π) averaged over 5 GeV bins at fixed pseudorapidity (η). The error bars combine statistical and point-to-point systematic errors. The curves are NLO pQCD calculations using two sets of fragmentation functions (FF). | nucl | ex0602011-Fig1.jpg |
0.499021 | ec508166c68c4bdaa2dd769048576cd5 | Inclusive π^0 cross section per binary collision for d+Au collisions, as in Fig. <ref>. The curves are calculations described in the text. (Inset) Diphoton invariant mass spectrum for data (stars), normalized to simulation (histogram). | nucl | ex0602011-Fig2.jpg |
0.448714 | a3517a2728564f4e9c78e0bd227de1d5 | Nuclear modification factor (R_ dAu) for minimum-bias d+Au collisions versus transverse momentum (p_T). The solid circles are for π^0 mesons. The open circles and boxes are for negative hadrons <cit.>. The error bars are statistical, while the shaded boxes are point-to-point systematic errors. (Inset) R_ dAu for π^0 mesons with the ratio of curves in Figs. <ref> and <ref>. | nucl | ex0602011-Fig3.jpg |
0.445456 | 7bced6ab34dc428ea6e0020d79b2189f | Coincidence probability versus azimuthal angle difference between the forward π^0 and a leading charged particle at midrapidity with p_T>0.5GeV/c. The left (right) column is p+p (d+Au) data. The curves are fits described in the text, including the area of the back-to-back peak (S). | nucl | ex0602011-Fig4.jpg |
0.478017 | 5bce66c995f24fec96be3e92414e2c65 | Proposed spinodal region for the nuclear system. The experimental points were obtained by the FASA collaboration. The arrow line shows the way from the starting point at T=0 and normal nuclear density ρ_0 to the break-up point at ρ_t and to the kinetic freeze-out at the mean density ρ_f. Critical temperature is estimated in <cit.>. | nucl | ex0602013-pic1.jpg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.