dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.438889
026b4b5e8aca4c64879f81b215a0dc78
Value of χ^2 as a function of V_t/ V_0 for comparison of the measured and model predicted IMF charge distributions. The calculations with the INC*+SMM combined model was performed under the assumption of two free parameters: V_t – the effective volume at the stage of pre-fragment formation, and T_c – the critical temperature for the liquid-gas phase transition.
nucl
ex0602013-pic2.jpg
0.426326
c82f54c52aeb414a81ed80e00b3fb086
Upper: qualitative presentation of the potential energy of the hot nucleus (with excitation energy E_0^*) as a function of the system radius. The ground state energy of the system corresponds to E=0. B is the fragmentation barrier, Q is the released energy. Bottom: schematic view of the multifragmentation process and its time scale: t_1 – thermalization time, t_2 – time of the expansion driven by thermal pressure, t_3 – the mean time of the multi-scission point (with dispersion, which is measured as fragment emission time, τ_em ).
nucl
ex0602013-pic3.jpg
0.393504
d397bd0b04204fc8aed8e3da2d53934c
Asymmetry change (1+2AP) of ^57Cu in the NaCl as a function of H_0 is shown in (a). In (b), the NMR data taken at 0.2 T with FM = ± 50 kHz is shown. In (c), the data taken at 0.15 T with FM = ± 25 kHz is shown. The hatched areas in (b) and (c) are base lines obtained from weighted sum of all the data except the resonance point.
nucl
ex0602016-NMRdata.jpg
0.444365
72a5e10b603343f58a551b14b2436269
Magnetic moments of odd-mass Cu isotopes. The solid circle is the present result and solid squares are the experimental data. The dashed line and open squares are the theoretical calculation from <cit.>, the open circle from <cit.>, and the open-inverse triangle from <cit.>. The open triangles are predictions based on the systematics <cit.>.
nucl
ex0602016-cumoment.jpg
0.446053
91798c4485d14387b919aff308b95987
Spin expectation value of known T = 1/2 pair in the fpg shell. The solid circles are the experimental data, open square is from <cit.> and the open circle from <cit.>. The Schmidt values are indicated by the solid lines.
nucl
ex0602016-spinexp.jpg
0.391883
72c1ce3523114126b22f20359c068f72
Comparison of previous np scattering differential cross section measurements (a) from Uppsala <cit.> and Los Alamos <cit.>, and (b) from PSI <cit.> and Los Alamos <cit.> near 200 MeV. The Los Alamos data in each case are represented by closed squares and the other data by open circles. The experimental results are compared to the Nijmegen PWA93 <cit.> partial wave analysis solution evaluated at appropriate energies. The Los Alamos data have been renormalized by factors of 1.092 in (a) and 1.078 in (b) to bring them into agreement with the PWA. The relative cross sections reported in <cit.> have been similarly normalized here, while the reported absolute cross section scale for the Uppsala data has been retained.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig1.jpg
0.444898
6b662925ef434d0896966dd60ce000b1
The distribution of np free scattering events in the scattering angle bin θ^sc_p = 3-6^∘ with respect to forward proton energy deposition in the rear hodoscope. The curve represents a fit with a Gaussian plus exponential tail. The tail represents valid free scattering events where the proton undergoes a nuclear reaction in the stopping scintillator.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig10.jpg
0.475045
2cb36ee86c1e439daddd30718843c7bf
Comparison of the measured (solid line with sizable statistical fluctuations) and simulated (dotted line) distributions of free (CH_2-C) np scattering events in the angle bin θ_p^sc = 42-45^∘ with respect to proton azimuthal scattering angle ϕ_p^sc, for the 1-punch (a) and 2-stop (b) data samples. Forward detector geometry parameters, plus a single overall normalization parameter per angle bin and data sample, have been adjusted to optimize the fit simultaneously for all angle bins and both data samples.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig11.jpg
0.55182
08e91138413a4314969834071d77773a
The simulated acceptance of the 1-punch data sample. The inset shows a greatly magnified vertical scale for the most forward proton scattering angles.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig12.jpg
0.402265
15f8a0bc4d3f465d89fe2f8e6d804baa
The fractional differences between the absolute differential cross sections extracted for different analyzed data subsamples. The plotted error bars take into account only the independent statistical (including those from background subtractions) uncertainties for the three samples. Slightly different correction factors c_i were applied to the cross sections for different samples, as indicated in Table <ref>, before the comparison was made.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig13.jpg
0.439731
d2cb7e4f5acb42ebb63fd17f4b26f7f0
Absolute differential cross section from the present experiment, compared with data from Ref. <cit.> and with PWA calculations at two relevant energies. The error bars on the present results are statistical (including background subtraction), while the shaded band represents all systematic uncertainties, including those in the overall normalization.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig14.jpg
0.385957
c48710cc9e0b4da6adec29d7b263f02a
The distribution of DSSD arrival time difference between the two recoil protons for tagged neutron events, shown for all 2-stop events (following subtraction of the corrupted events as per Sec. <ref>) and for 2-stop events where the lower of the two DSSD energy depositions (E_p2) exceeds 2.0 MeV. The vertical lines indicate the prompt coincidence gate (central region between the inner two lines) imposed in the analysis, plus two displaced gates used to assess accidental coincidence background in event stream 1. The long tail seen for events with E_p2≤ 2.0 MeV, arising from detector noise and imperfect software corrections for time walk near the front-end discriminator threshold, leads to an overestimate of the accidental coincidence yield, but the correction and uncertainty still remain quite small.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig15.jpg
0.457859
48f3107a8d7e4f0ab0e1f502b16a76b3
The difference distributions in x (left) and y (right) coordinates determined from tracking of the forward proton vs. reconstruction of the tagged neutron, for the 1-punch data sample after CH_2 - C subtraction. The vertical lines indicate the location of software gates used to remove events that may be complicated by sequential reactions or tagging errors.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig16.jpg
0.444291
13957dfe85b94eafb26063d77dca0c13
The reconstructed (a) y_tag spectrum for the CH_2 target before background subtraction, and (b) Δ E pulse-height spectrum for CH_2-C for the θ_p^sc bin 3-6^∘. The superimposed curves in both frames represent fits used in estimating background subtraction accuracy.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig17.jpg
0.42649
fbe97a05db4742af90958558bb99a54b
np scattering opening angle spectra reconstructed for events where a large-angle proton fires at least the first two MWPCs and a forward neutron appears to fire the rear scintillator hodoscope. For such coincidence events, a clear free-scattering peak is seen with the CH_2 production target (upper frame), while no hint of such a peak is seen for the C target (lower). The solid curves are fits with a Gaussian peak superimposed on a quadratic background. The distribution shape for C reflects the quasifree np scattering opening-angle spectrum convoluted with the coincidence acceptance of the forward detector array.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig18.jpg
0.418085
73d4b5429f6d413eb097cdee7277b72c
The estimated fractional cross section error introduced by neutron polarization effects for the 1-punch and 2-stop event samples, plotted as a function of np scattering angle.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig19.jpg
0.516748
76a17f339aa644e8b3d943a16cb8537e
Top view of the np scattering experiment setup.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig2.jpg
0.466945
00130a19afb84f1b83ac810715810592
The relative differences of the present absolute np scattering differential cross sections and of two SAID PWA solutions <cit.> from the Nijmegen PWA93 solution <cit.>, all at E_n = 194 MeV. The SP40 solution is from a 2003 analysis of the database from 0–400 MeV, while SP05 is the current SAID solution, fitted over the range 0–3.0 GeV, including the present data in the fit.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig20.jpg
0.591406
fc2e552c8ad148aca82d3251167894ff
The effect on the present analysis of neglecting tagger information about the neutron incidence angle in the reconstruction of the np scattering angle for each event. The closed circles represent the final results, while the open squares are those when the scattering angle is estimated only with respect to the central neutron beam direction. Note the suppressed zero on the cross section scale.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig21.jpg
0.474356
f803195334cd4fecbb584a28206e70c8
Particle identification plot for one DSSD-BD combination for (a) tagged protons and (b) tagged neutrons.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig3.jpg
0.537423
98fc8b0c15e24a65b81b819cf02e429b
The reconstructed energy (a) and horizontal transverse coordinate (b) of tagged neutrons at the secondary target for 1-punch events, 2-stop events and their sum (solid black line).
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig4.jpg
0.444253
ede72d3e62964f0f95407606efdbb2f6
The ADC outputs of two BD's plotted against one another, revealing regions of 1-punch tagged neutron events, but also a region dominated by correlated noise in both quadrants. Events along the x- and y-axes, where one BD signal falls in the pedestal region, are also mostly valid 1-punch events.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig5.jpg
0.423232
a6122a9fa85742cb8813a3588800a7b9
The correlation for apparent 2-stop np scattering candidates between the higher of the DSSD energy depositions for the two recoil protons in the tagger and the difference in predicted x coordinates at the secondary target from neutron tagging vs. forward proton ray-tracing. The long correlated tail contains corrupted punch-through events for which electronic loss of backing detector energy information has led to misidentification of the event and large systematic errors in the tagging.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig6.jpg
0.511901
9c95dc7dfe4e4f9aa07d833e9b6fe138
The subtraction of the simulated corrupted events removes the tail from the 2-stop event sample. The simulated spectrum has been normalized by matching to the 2-stop subsample characterized by backing detector information with valid times but zero energy.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig7.jpg
0.44909
91b5d30a8d5f4c7bbce8466c0fb0d458
Distribution of np scattering event candidates with respect to y_tag and to Δ E scintillator pulse height for the CH_2 and C targets separately, and for the difference between them.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig8.jpg
0.410311
3503975785c14cee82858549c29fbddb
The distribution of np scattering candidate events after subtraction of C from CH_2 data with respect to Δ E ADC and proton lab angle. The red lines show the boundaries of the gate applied to event stream 2 to select free scattering events.
nucl
ex0602017-vigdor_fig9.jpg
0.475683
a1a20475178d4e389f71a26f47e32f5e
Spectra of charged hadrons measured with BRAHMS for the reaction Au+Au at 62.4 for the four indicated centrality classes at η=0 (left panels), η=1 (middle panels) and η=3.2 (right panels). Upper row: the distributions show the spectrometer acceptance at the various settings. The dotted lines show the cuts in η that have been applied.
nucl
ex0602018-fig1color.jpg
0.475411
f036c2e86ed44fb5ac5726aea2f9addd
Nuclear modification factor at η=0 (open triangles) and η=1 (closed triangles) for the four centrality classes indicated. The magnitude of the uncertainty on ⟨ N_bin⟩ is indicated with the shaded band around unity. The estimated systematic errors on the data points (from normalisations and reference spectra) are indicated by the shaded boxes around the points. The ± 20% uncertainty on the p+p reference spectrum affects all the shown ratios equally.
nucl
ex0602018-fig2color.jpg
0.506947
bc9bc8eea34d4ce19c5fad6dc1042b43
R_CP ratio for centrality ratios (0-10% to 40-60%) for the three considered rapidities: η=0 (open triangles), η=1 (closed triangles), η=3.2 (closed circles). The systematic errors are indicated by the shaded boxes.
nucl
ex0602018-fig3color.jpg
0.36642
d790b22e5b79444483512044a5207610
Energy systematics of the nuclear modification factor in central heavy ion collisions at p_T=[4]GeV/c for 17.2,62.4,130 and 200 at midrapidity (data from the same energy range have been offset for clarity). The data is from ref. <cit.>.
nucl
ex0602018-fig4color.jpg
0.484068
6e1b5fb1709f4946986f0c4eb58bff53
Reduced cross section for ep elastic scattering as a function of ϵ, at Q^2=1 GeV^2 (a), 3 GeV^2 (b), and 5 GeV^2 (c) from the SF method (solid line) and from the Born approximation (dashed line) for dipole parametrization of FFs. The relative difference, R_σ, between these two calculations is shown in (d) for Q^2=1 GeV^2 (solid line), 3 GeV^2 (dotted line), and 5 GeV^2 (dash-dotted line). For comparison, the expectation from the polarization data is shown as a dotted line, in (a), (b) and (c).
nucl
th0602007-fig5.jpg
0.519326
62b58319d2e44930ac592e92bfbee0dd
Angular asymmetry and polarization observables, for a fixed value of θ=45^0. Notations as in Fig. <ref>.
nucl
th0602007-obs.jpg
0.568546
dc328b60ccac408182a28092009dd963
Contribution of the G_E(Q^2) dependent term to the reduced cross section (in percent) for ϵ=0.2 (solid line), ϵ=0.5 (dashed line), ϵ=0.8 (dash-dotted line), in the hypothesis of FF scaling (thin lines) or following the expectation from polarization data (thick lines).
nucl
th0602007-percent.jpg
0.504535
799fd6e58f9a4ebabadf89d3d2094a6e
Nucleon Form Factors in SL region: (a) proton electric FF, scaled by μ_p G_Mp (b) proton magnetic FF scaled by μ_p G_D , (c) neutron electric FF, (d) neutron magnetic FF, scaled by μ_n G_D. The predictions of the models are drawn: from Ref. <cit.> (dotted line), from Ref. <cit.> (solid line), model from Ref. Ref. <cit.> (dash-dotted line), from <cit.> (dashed line).
nucl
th0602007-sl.jpg
0.55487
1f8748a4b88c4f6ab5c08da289d7edfe
Form Factors in TL region and predictions of the models: pQCD-inspired (dashed line), from Ref. <cit.> (dotted line), from Ref. <cit.> (solid line).
nucl
th0602007-tl.jpg
0.480294
5d76cbb3b367488388981543e5ad3119
Reduced cross section with (solid circle) and without (open circles) radiative corrections, for Q^2=1, 2, 2.5, and 3 GeV^2. Data are from Ref. <cit.> and two-parameters linear fits (solid and dashed lines). The dotted lines corresponds to the slopes suggested by the polarization data.
nucl
th0602007-walk.jpg
0.496381
b823529a086e44eaac5bd6ec992b0d57
Volume integrals J_R for superheavy nuclei as a function of Z_D (upper), N_D (middle), and A_D (lower). Within a major shell one finds a smooth decrease of J_R with a minimum value around J_R ≈ 280 MeV fm^3. From the fits to the data points one can directly see that J_R drops below 280 MeV fm^3 at Z ≈ 130, N ≈ 192, and A ≈ 322 leading to the magic numbers Z_magic = 132, N_magic = 194, and A_magic = 326. The open circles are extrapolations for ^294118 and the lower limit of J_R > 279 MeV fm^3 close to the next closed shells (see text). The open squares are nuclei with Q = 18 (^208Pb = ^204Hg ⊗ ) and Q = 20 (^210Pb = ^206Hg ⊗ , ^210Po = ^206Pb ⊗ ).
nucl
th0602008-jr.jpg
0.448091
9cef19fdee2241f08be304c27679331e
Potential strength parameter λ (upper part) and volume integrals J_R (lower) around the shell closure N = 82 for ^130-136Xe ⊗ α (diamonds), ^132-142Ba ⊗ α (circles), ^134-144Ce ⊗ α (triangles), and ^140-146Nd ⊗ α (squares) isotopes. One can clearly see the discontinuity at the shell closure N = 82 (see text).
nucl
th0602008-n82.jpg
0.451884
6034aec848c948e0b4fa4f72c71b4883
Potential strength parameter λ (upper part) and volume integrals J_R (lower) versus decay energy E around the shell closure N = 82 for ^130-136Xe ⊗ α (diamonds), ^132-142Ba ⊗ α (circles), ^134-144Ce ⊗ α (triangles), and ^140-146Nd ⊗ α (squares) isotopes (see text; description of symbols see Fig. <ref>).
nucl
th0602008-n82qlam.jpg
0.540614
9e8abfc43ffa49b8bc0c2dd87a1bea7a
Phase shift δ_L for the L = 0 partial wave for the system ^212Po = ^208Pb ⊗ . The derived width from Eq. (<ref>) is Γ = 3.52 × 10^-14 MeV. Note the extremely small stepsize of the calculation of Δ E = 2.0 × 10^-15 MeV!
nucl
th0602008-phase.jpg
0.469095
e7a482872be04c6e8bb8e460ae2bf8ea
The preformation factors P are shown for several superheavy α emitters. The horizontal lines indicate an average value of P ≈ 8 % (full line) and typical uncertainties of a factor of three (dotted lines).
nucl
th0602008-preformation.jpg
0.45681
86439ba1ec4b4c059503e009989458e7
Potential strength parameter λ (upper part) and volume integrals J_R (lower) versus decay energy E for superheavy nuclei. Known nuclei are shown as full circles. The extrapolated doubly-magic nucleus with Z_magic = 132, N_magic = 194, and A_magic = 326 is shown as open circle. The open squares are nuclei with Q = 18 and Q = 20 (see also Fig. <ref>).
nucl
th0602008-qlam.jpg
0.493709
f3a7021ecf8e40039e7eb0922a7c100c
(a): A 90^∘ spin rotation of a x-polarized neutron around the y-axis (perpendicular to the plane) when travelling through a x-polarized target. (b): Time reversal of (a). (c): A 180^∘ rotation around the y-axis of (b) which shows a -90^∘ spin rotation instead. Therefore, the combined T- and R-invariance require a zero spin rotation along the y-axis.
nucl
th0602010-phiy.jpg
0.494253
ed718ec089d14f78bd6bf601e8a28b7b
(a): The polarization P_y of an unpolarized neutron beam when travelling through a x-polarized target. (b): Time reversal of (a). (c): A 180^∘ rotation along the y-axis of (b) which shows the definition of asymmetry but with an additional minus sign -A_y. Therefore, the combined T- and R-invariance require P_y+A_y=0.
nucl
th0602010-py.jpg
0.491185
ed04fb2f43464e6d8f356b8deb6810f6
Upper panel: quasielastic differential cross section for neutral current neutrino scattering at 1 GeV from ^12C for proton knockout obtained using the RFG (solid), and the empirical scaling function (dashed). T_p is the outgoing proton kinetic energy. Lower panel: sensitivity to the magnetic and axial strangeness content of the nucleus. (Ref. <cit.>)
nucl
th0602011-fig5.jpg
0.519078
98925e7403504334aec479ca80eb5e5f
Charge-changing neutrino cross section for for 1 GeV neutrinos on ^12C and neutrino-muon scattering angles of 45 degrees. The cross section is plotted versus the final-state muon momentum k'. Solid line: superscaling prediction; heavier line (red on line): RFG. The separate QE and Δ contribution are shown (dotted lines). (Ref. <cit.>)
nucl
th0602011-xx.jpg
0.498236
927b6938da5e43eabeaf9931634e9e62
Dependence of the electron family lepton fraction Y_L_e for μ_L_e = 200 MeV (thick lines) and μ_L_e = 400 MeV (thin lines) on the quark chemical potential at a fixed temperature, T=0 (solid lines), T=20 (dashed lines), and T=40 (dotted lines).
nucl
th0602018-YL-fraction_new.jpg
0.485458
582bcd56202b41d6b34d7c2dd057bbd0
The dependence of the number densities of quarks and electrons on the quark chemical potential at T=0. Note that the densities of all three quark flavors coincide above μ=457. The density of muons vanishes for all values of μ.
nucl
th0602018-densT0log.jpg
0.421707
f26391b410854ee09962e244f72ba1b9
General structure of the phase diagram of neutral dense quark matter in the three-dimensional space spanned by the quark chemical potential μ, the lepton-number chemical potential μ_L_e, and the temperature T.
nucl
th0602018-phase_diag-3d_v4.jpg
0.432367
ac45f74aba24474c9b524338ada855c3
The phase diagram of neutral quark matter in model (<ref>). First-order phase boundaries are indicated by bold solid lines, whereas the thin solid lines mark second-order phase boundaries between two phases which differ by one or more nonzero diquark condensates. The dashed lines indicate the (dis-)appearance of gapless modes in different phases, and they do not correspond to phase transitions.
nucl
th0602018-phasediagram.jpg
0.478943
f55f06980477430193d2a36a780d98d4
Pressure divided by μ^4 for different neutral solutions of the gap equations at T = 0 as functions of the quark chemical potential μ: regular CFL (bold solid line), gapless CFL (thin solid line), 2SC (dashed line), normal (dotted line).
nucl
th0602018-pmu_0.jpg
0.437615
8d557b7bf0c04d47a34e097235fa6f7c
Ratio of down and up quark chemical potentials as a function of μ_L_e/μ in the toy model. The crosses mark the solutions at several values of the lepton fraction.
nucl
th0602018-toy.jpg
0.485479
4b146d93d4a3432db0ee345f4dd21576
Inelastic total down-scattering cross sections on the bubble of radius of 1.75; nm in liquid helium as a function of neutron energy for breathing (dashed line) and surface (solid line) modes. (n=1)
nucl
th0602019-R175.jpg
0.47143
951d4a90ed9d4a3097a6037896988b78
Elastic total cross section of neutrons with energy E_n=1 neV as a function of a bubble radius in liquid helium.
nucl
th0602019-e1.jpg
0.43348
3071cd4c03aa42ceb064ade87ada85f0
Elastic total cross section of neutrons with energy E_n=100 neV as a function of a bubble radius in liquid helium.
nucl
th0602019-e100.jpg
0.417122
db983bec095f4a64a33c074a509d6abf
Inelastic total up-scattering cross sections of neutrons with energy E_n=100; neV as a function of a bubble radius in liquid helium for breathing (dashed line) and surface (solid line) modes. (n=1)
nucl
th0602019-ener100.jpg
0.490073
128928ba0c064c8b8150fc7cef131277
Calculated spectra of the ^12C(K^-,p) (upper panels) and the ^16O(K^-,p) (lower panels) reactions at T_K^-=600 MeV plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ_p^ lab=0 (deg.) for the chiral unitary optical potential (left panels) and the phenomenological optical potential (right panels). Solid lines show the results with the energy dependent potentials and dashed lines those with the energy independent potentials fixed at E=0 MeV. The solid arrows indicate the calculated binding energies of the kaonic nuclear states coupled to the ground states of the final state nucleus, namely (1p_3/2)^-1_p state for C target case and (1p_1/2)^-1_p state for O target case, respectively. The binding energies are calculated with the energy dependent potential. The dashed arrows in lower panels indicate the binding energies of the kaonic nuclear states suggested by the experimental group <cit.>. The vertical dashed line indicates the kaon production threshold.
nucl
th0602021-12C_16O.jpg
0.526989
4b1cc9355f9f42c29386219b79a83e73
Subcomponents of the kaonic nucleus formation cross sections in the ^12C(K^-,p) reactions at T_K^-=600 MeV are plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ^ lab_p=0 (deg.) for the phenomenological optical potential Eq.(<ref>). The upper panel shows the results with the reduced imaginary potential 1/10 ImV_ opt, while the lower panel shows those with Eq. (<ref>). The solid lines show the results obtained by the Green function method for the sum of the subcomponents [(s)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p] and [(p)_K⊗[(1p_3/2)^-1_p]. The dashed lines show those by the effective number approach for the sum of the subcomponents [(1s_ nucl)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p], [(2p_ nucl)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p] and [(2s_ nucl)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p]. The vertical dashed line indicates the kaon production threshold.
nucl
th0602021-12C_GvsE.jpg
0.493332
e25834cb70de486d8f8da324f4744d77
Calculated spectra of the ^12C(K^-,p) reaction at T_K^-=600 MeV plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ_p^ lab=0 (deg.) for the energy dependent phenomenological optical potential with the different branching ratio of the decay channels defined in Eq. (<ref>) (see text in detail). Each subcomponent is indicated in the figure. The vertical dashed line indicates the kaon production threshold.
nucl
th0602021-12C_ImV_Gal09_01.jpg
0.555326
487e3121d2c448dda73beba29050ffbc
Kaonic atom formation cross sections in ^12C(K^-,p) reactions at T_K^-=600 MeV plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ_p^ lab=0 (deg.) for the chiral unitary optical potential <cit.>. Solid line indicates the result of the Green function method and dashed line that of the effective number approach.
nucl
th0602021-12C_ImV_chi_atom_GvsNeff.jpg
0.437828
4d26233c0077489aa9a6a881e19b3302
Calculated spectra of the ^12C(K^-,p) reaction at T_K^-=600 MeV plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ_p^ lab=0 (deg.). The energy independent phenomenological potential evaluated at E=0 in Eq. (<ref>) is used. Each subcomponent is indicated in the figure. The vertical dashed line indicates the kaon production threshold.
nucl
th0602021-12C_ImV_ph_Fig4.jpg
0.454753
9ebf3acc22ef4b4c912a3dd273bc8cac
Calculated spectra of the ^12C(K^-,p) and ^16O(K^-,p) reactions at T_K^-=600 MeV plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ^ lab_p=0 (deg.) for the phenomenological optical potential with different energy dependence defined in Eq. (<ref>) (see text in detail). Each subcomponent is indicated in the figure. The vertical dashed lines indicate the kaon production threshold.
nucl
th0602021-12C_ph_omega.jpg
0.534145
e12ac53e628f4fa682e3d0eb836ee738
The kaon–nucleus optical potential of the chiral unitary approach <cit.> for ^11B as a function of the radial coordinate r. The upper and lower panels show the real and imaginary parts, respectively. The solid, dotted and dashed lines indicate the potential strength for the kaon energies E=0 MeV, E=-50 MeV, and E=-100 MeV, respectively.
nucl
th0602021-12C_potential_chi.jpg
0.45167
3fc9c1c6786b45ec800b591947e72ddc
The kaon–nucleus optical potential of the phenomenological fit <cit.> with the phase space factor <cit.> for ^11B as a function of the radial coordinate r. The upper and lower panels show the real and imaginary parts, respectively. The solid, dotted and dashed lines indicate the potential strength for the kaon energies E=0 MeV, E=-50 MeV, and E=-100 MeV, respectively. The real part does not have the energy dependence.
nucl
th0602021-12C_potential_ph.jpg
0.413424
88821c224933458491529f55cfcfaab3
Subcomponents of the kaonic atom formation cross sections in the ^12C(K^-,p) reactions at T_K^-=600 MeV are plotted as functions of the emitted proton energy T_p at θ^ lab_p=0 (deg.) for the chiral unitary optical potential <cit.>. Left and right panels show the calculated results at energies of kaonic atom 1s and 2p states formation, respectively. The upper and middle panels show the results with the reduced imaginary potential 1/8ImV_ opt and 1/4ImV_ opt, while the lower panels show those with the full chiral unitary potential. The solid lines show the results obtained by the Green function method for the sum of the subcomponents [(s)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p] and [(p)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p]. The dashed lines show those by the effective number approach for the sum of subcomponents [(1s_ atom)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p] and [(2p_ atom)_K⊗ (1p_3/2)^-1_p]. The vertical dashed lines indicate the binding energies of kaonic atom 1s state (left panels) and 2p state (right panels).
nucl
th0602021-atomicstate.jpg
0.423204
863d2cd106d541b5aa2fd541767157b9
Plot of deuteron separation energy against neutron numbers at specific proton numbers indicated within the figures.
nucl
th0602022-fig-1n.jpg
0.452605
20e6b256f2f9488b849c619a296bba2d
Same as Fig.1 except against proton numbers at specific neutron numbers.
nucl
th0602022-fig-2n.jpg
0.399949
c636341776914b63b8f0df553028efbd
Same as Fig.1 except against nucleon numbers (proton or neutron numbers).
nucl
th0602022-fig-3n.jpg
0.422979
9676e960c91745308738cfc63a1ee03e
Same as Fig.3.
nucl
th0602022-fig-4n.jpg
0.404355
805036ab2cac42bf8c5f5702f9d8eef0
(Color online) Transverse momentum dependence of the ratio of midrapidity ϕ meson and Ω baryon yields in central (b=0 fm) to that in mid-peripheral (b=8 fm) Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV.
nucl
th0602025-RcpPTPhiOmg.jpg
0.428455
7da0b848d9574f288e3d7627fad020c2
(Color online) Transverse momentum distributions of mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks (s+s̅) as well as light quarks and antiquarks (u+u̅+d+d̅ ) at freeze out in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN )=200 GeV and b=8 fm..
nucl
th0602025-dNdPTq.jpg
0.430901
9ae41d04f14745ad9ae45eed20443529
(Color online) Transverse momentum dependence of midrapidity ϕ mesons and Ω (Ω ^-+Ω̅^+) baryons (upper panels) and their ratio (lower panels) in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV with b=0 fm (left panels) and b=8 fm (right panels). Data for ϕ mesons in 0 -5% centrality bin from the STAR collaboration <cit.> (solid stars) and in 0 -10% centrality bin from the PHENIX collaboration <cit.> (open stars) as well as preliminary data for Ω baryons in 0-10% centrality bin from the STAR collaboration <cit.> (solid triangles) are shown in upper left panel, while those for the Ω /ϕ ratio in 0- 10% centrality bin are shown in lower-left panel.
nucl
th0602025-dNdPTratioPhiOmg.jpg
0.447952
80b020e85bb34e0cb466b4c49e8caaa2
(Color online) Same as Fig. <ref> but with m_s=500 MeV and R_ ϕ=0.5 fm or 0.35 fm and R_Ω=0.9 fm.
nucl
th0602025-dNdPTratioPhiOmgMS5h.jpg
0.432885
9451f29a6b78434a9f61b255167055e0
(Color online) Freeze out rate of mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks as a function of proper time τ as well as the time t in the nucleus-nucleus center-of-mass system.
nucl
th0602025-dNdTAUtSSb.jpg
0.437642
838da11e1ee54da39ca14fc52f943a10
(Color online) Hadron size (root-mean-square radius) dependence of rapidity density dN/dy of mid-rapidity ϕ mesons (solid squares) and Ω (Ω ^-+Ω̅^+) baryons (open squares) produced in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV with b=0 fm (upper panel) and b=8 fm (lower panel).
nucl
th0602025-dNdYPhiOmgR.jpg
0.410259
4a47c68036394159b4186f2b22363cff
(Color online) Rapidity distributions of strange and antistrange quarks (s+s̅) as well as light quarks and antiquarks (u+u̅+d+d̅) at freeze out in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm.
nucl
th0602025-dNdYq.jpg
0.447184
186c2f5ab2384bb181d15a44117fcf06
(Color online) Number density distribution in the transverse plane for mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks at freeze out in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm (upper panel) and corresponding contour plot (lower panel).
nucl
th0602025-dNdxdySSb.jpg
0.493818
f7aa71891b1c4f489d09634d5786e3f8
(Color online) Time evolution of the energy density in the central cell of partonic matter in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm.
nucl
th0602025-eDen.jpg
0.470174
0f9afd3ad5fb48939f06c10dbf18bee3
(Color online) Transverse momentum dependence of anisotropic flows v_2 and v_4 of mid-rapidity ϕ mesons (left panel) and Ω baryons (right panel) produced in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm. Solid and dashed lines in left panel are, respectively, 1.1v_2^2 and 1.2v_2^2 for ϕ mesons, while solid line in right panel is 0.7v_2^2 for Ω baryons.
nucl
th0602025-v24PTPhiOmg.jpg
0.451652
2e1f7f56bfc9444c886049fdb5402e4c
(Color online) Same as Fig. <ref> but with m_s=500 MeV and R_ ϕ=0.5 fm or 0.35 fm and R_Ω=0.9 fm.
nucl
th0602025-v24PTPhiOmgMS5h.jpg
0.39659
f115819fe43c4af6aebfc32cab1b998f
(Color online) Same as Fig. <ref> but with R_ϕ=R_Ω=4.5fm.
nucl
th0602025-v24PTR45.jpg
0.477504
8fc42b6a29c64de99550a7f9190b1fe8
(Color online) Transverse momentum dependence of elliptic flow v_2 (solid squares) and forth-order anisotropic flow v_4 (open squares) of mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks (s+s̅) at freeze out in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm. The thick solid line represents 0.85v_2^2 of strange and antistrange quarks, and open triangles are v_2 of mid-rapidity light up and anti-up quarks (u+u̅).
nucl
th0602025-v24PTssBuuB.jpg
0.439128
0e240fcfd4f14340a7230162de6b4dd6
(Color online) Transverse momentum dependence of the v_2 of mid-rapidity ϕ mesons (left panel) and Ω baryons (right panel) in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm with different values of root-mean-square radii R_ ϕ and R_Ω.
nucl
th0602025-v2PTPhiOmgR.jpg
0.411852
0255f671da0c4a02a7221c5991dc1c91
(Color online) Valence quark number scaled elliptic flow v_2/n_q as a function of scaled transverse momentum p_T/n_q for mid-rapidity ϕ mesons and Ω baryons produced in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8 fm with R_ϕ=0.65 fm (solid squares) and 0.47 fm (open squares) as well as R_Ω=1.2 fm (solid line). Results for mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks (s+s̅) at freeze-out are shown by solid stars.
nucl
th0602025-v2PTscaling.jpg
0.411764
0c80b67a2812423986121aeb961b0882
(Color online) Same as Fig. <ref> but with m_s=500 MeV and R_ ϕ=0.5 fm and 0.35 fm as well as R_Ω=0.9 fm.
nucl
th0602025-v2PTscalingMS5h.jpg
0.446114
dded300c8ff0458885d1dd0752390ea2
(Color online) Same as Fig. <ref> but with R_ϕ= R_Ω=4.5 fm.
nucl
th0602025-v2PTscalingR45.jpg
0.518102
c8c902eef79243e48b58fcfde71136f1
(Color online) Space-time structure of mid-rapidity strange and antistrange quarks at freeze out in Au+Au collisions at √(s_NN)=200 GeV and b=8fm.
nucl
th0602025-ztSSb.jpg
0.445681
e326ef1cac06463aac00fc516ab4aef5
Ratio between the cross section with different energy prescriptions and the TOPT cross section. The dotted, dashed-dotted and dashed line corresponds on-shell approximation, fixed-kinematics and static approximation, respectively. The solid line is the calculation within the S-matrix approach. The Ohio interaction is used for the NN distortions.
nucl
th0602026-pifcptbepsmr.jpg
0.419506
73be8ff16a8441d1a92b59a358c2206f
Dependence of the effect of the fixed kinematics approximation for the cross section for pp → pn π^+ on the orbital π(NN ) angular momentum. The solid line is the full calculation. The dashed line is the cross section considering only s-wave contributions to the π N amplitude. The dotted line with +'s further assumes the fixed kinematics approximation. The Ohio interaction is used for the NN distortions.
nucl
th0602026-pipswave.jpg
0.456103
fdc144de60fb41ff8f6f21c51927905c
Transverse signal velocity distributions for all particles for various time steps.
nucl
th0602027-figure1.jpg
0.421669
e5cc07d3e5034cc8bb755d1ec5eac1aa
Pion, kaon, and nucleon m_T distributions for various time steps.
nucl
th0602027-figure2.jpg
0.449556
3a044af90ab249c79f0ac7d500c844e9
Pion elliptic flow vs. p_T for various time steps.
nucl
th0602027-figure3.jpg
0.461795
84a253490ffb495b80842795ddfa28f1
Two-pion HBT source parameters vs. p_T for various time steps. The ordinate scale for λ is shown to the right.
nucl
th0602027-figure4.jpg
0.442736
4ace5702aa9b4cb497e9d37e9b3304db
Transverse signal velocity distributions for all particles for l=1,5, and 8.
nucl
th0602027-figure5.jpg
0.442132
144c8a0a4c484ea9848e244b6c2ba261
Pion p_T distributions for l=1,5, and 8.
nucl
th0602027-figure6.jpg
0.444311
4d9ba0e542e4419bad420c634fdae5b6
Pion elliptic flow vs. p_T for l=1,5, and 8.
nucl
th0602027-figure7.jpg
0.421207
1bce461eafe04c7082d4a64bf022367f
Two-pion HBT source parameters vs. p_T for l=1,5, and 8. The ordinate scale for λ is shown to the right.
nucl
th0602027-figure8.jpg
0.422283
45784a185dc842baa1f734392eac38ca
Density and pairing gap calculated for a nucleus immersed in the neutron sea, at the Fermi energy E_F = 5.8 MeV. They are spherically symmetric, but are calculated in the cylindrical box described in the text (radius 30 fm and height 40 fm). Only the region 0 < z < 15 fm and 0 < ρ < 15 fm is shown.
nucl
th0602028-fig1.jpg
0.420815
258b6fac25484b83bbe54b95c25ae473
Density associated with a ν=1 vortex, calculated in the cylindrical box described in the text (radius 30 fm and height 45 fm), without and with a nucleus at the center of the box. Only the region 0 < z < 15 fm, 0 < ρ <15 fm is shown. (a) Density associated with a ν=1 vortex in the cell without the nucleus. (b) Density associated with a ν=1 vortex in the presence of the nucleus.
nucl
th0602028-fig2.jpg
0.431986
ddb8f3b4243347358dc4570d08aedc9b
Pairing gap associated with a ν=1 and a ν=2 vortex, calculated in the cylindrical box described in the text (radius 30 fm and height 40 fm), without and with a nucleus at the center of the box. Only the region 0 < z <15 fm, 0 < ρ <15 fm is shown. (a) Gap associated with a ν=1 vortex in the cell without the nucleus. (b) Gap associated with a ν=1 vortex in the presence of the nucleus. (c) Gap associated with a ν=2 vortex in the cell without the nucleus. (d) Gap associated with a ν=2 vortex in the presence the nucleus.
nucl
th0602028-fig3.jpg