dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.47311 | 0a314bc13bc941cabf82b5000f413b9f | The average normal stress <σ_xx (x,t) > in the case α_M=0.08 as a function of x. | cond | mat0411214-AVSXX1.jpg |
0.421646 | e06d0041a7bd4ce09ed2d0216237a63c | s(x,z,T_3) as a function of (x,z) in the case α_M=0.08. | cond | mat0411214-S.jpg |
0.431171 | bd4ee558fa7148ee995b80288eb26225 | σ_xx(x,z,T_3) as a function of (x,z) in the case α_M=0.08. | cond | mat0411214-SXX.jpg |
0.439521 | 36c667d66e6342389d174a2dc8085020 | u(x,z,T_1/2) as a function of (x,z) in the case α_M=0.08. | cond | mat0411214-U.jpg |
0.498766 | 40d388b497ad4e44ba781cbb0b7492a3 | The position of the first perpendicular crack x_c as a function of the maximum value of an external force α_M for parameter set A. | cond | mat0411214-data.jpg |
0.509358 | be06ae8c8e244ef693ff5c7e2c0e77e3 | The position of the first perpendicular crack x_c as a function of the maximum value of an external force α_M for parameter set B. | cond | mat0411214-datb.jpg |
0.434874 | 4da6551c5ba5416fb2b88ccab9115003 | The position of the first perpendicular crack x_c as a function of difference between the maximum value of an external force α_M and the threshold value α_Y0 for parameter set A. | cond | mat0411214-datd.jpg |
0.456845 | 5b43b7abf03f4296bddcff3f88e02b2e | The illustration of viscoplastic material in a container. | cond | mat0411214-paste2.jpg |
0.455929 | c15091d9794c4b18af155bfea89125d2 | (a) Schematic device representation. (b) State manipulation diagram for measurements of the qubit relaxation rate. The inset shows operation pulse sequence. | cond | mat0411216-T1cFig1.jpg |
0.448488 | 527987f5ea964e21b40b8bec81868b08 | (a) Energy relaxation rate Γ_1 measured by the SET normally set in the JQP peak (closed circles) and in blockade regime (open squares) and phase decoherence rate Γ_2 (open circles) versus gate induced charge q of sample I (E_J/h = 5.1 GHz). The inset exemplifies a decay of probability P to detect charge in the trap as a function of the adiabatic pulse length t_a, measured at q = -0.36 e. Γ_1 is derived from exponential fit of the decay. (b) Γ_1 measured in sample II for three different Josephson energies. | cond | mat0411216-T1cFig2.jpg |
0.419923 | 373480021cbf477a8eace58fca439165 | Relaxation rate Γ_1 as a function of E_J measured at the degeneracy point (open triangles) and off the degeneracy point (open circles) at Δ E/h ≈ 100 GHz for sample I. | cond | mat0411216-T1cFig3.jpg |
0.449737 | 96898e2b6be44973a5b29e54f6c14208 | (a) Noise S_U/ħ^2 derived from Γ_1 - q dependences of the sample I (closed circles) and sample II (open circles). Open triangles show Γ_1 dependences of sample II at the degeneracy point. A dashed-dotted line represents a linear rise (4e^2/π)Rħω/ħ^2 (f noise) with R = 6 Ω. A dashed line is the 1/f noise from Eq. (<ref>) with α≈ (1.3×10^-3 e)^2 derived from Γ_2 measurements. (b) A schematic representation of the classical S^C_U(ω) and quantum S^Q_U(ω) noise behavior. At frequencies ω < kT/ħ, S^Q_U(ω)≈ S^C_U(ω) and behaves like a 1/f noise. At frequencies |ω| > kT/ħ, S^Q_U(ω) > S^C_U(ω) and the quantum noise is proportional to ω. | cond | mat0411216-T1cFig4.jpg |
0.999953 | a8524fd743dd4a03823f660ae7cd2702 | Left panel: Parametric plot of the reduced normal stresses P_ii^k/nT versus Kn^2 for α=0.8 and ϕ=0.5. Right panel: Parametric plot of the fourth cumulant c, relative to that of the HCS, versus Kn^2 for α=0.9 and ϕ=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. | cond | mat0411219-Fig1.jpg |
0.999953 | 68fd1a78193946398a52e1c3920e5826 | Parametric plot of the reduced kinetic shear viscosity η^k(α,ϕ)/η^k(1,ϕ) versus Kn^2 for α=0.8 and ϕ=0.2. The dotted line represents the estimated Navier–Stokes value. | cond | mat0411219-Fig1bis.jpg |
0.999953 | 305b9c380f0144c5b77ab0c31c27ac3d | Plots of the kinetic part of the shear viscosity (left panel) and of the total shear viscosity (right panel), relative to their respective theoretical values in the elastic limit in the first Sonine approximation, as functions of the coefficient of restitution for ϕ=0, 0.2, and 0.4. The symbols are simulation results, while the lines are the theoretical predictions in the first Sonine approximation. | cond | mat0411219-Fig3.jpg |
0.447298 | a6c99383b58143fdb3d5820703aba569 | Plots of the kinetic part of the shear viscosity (left panel) and of the total shear viscosity (right panel), relative to their respective theoretical values in the elastic limit in the first Sonine approximation, as functions of the packing fraction for α=0.9, 0.8, and 0.6. The symbols are simulation results, while the lines are the theoretical predictions in the first Sonine approximation. | cond | mat0411219-Graph3.jpg |
0.999953 | 41d20d5e1e524701b4ee8cafe880539d | Plot of the reduced function P(α) as a function of the coefficient of restitution α in the three-dimensional case for σ_1=σ_2, x_1=0.2, and three different values of the mass ratio: (a) m_1/m_2=0.5, (b) m_1/m_2=2, and (c) m_1/m_2=4. | cond | mat0411221-fig4.jpg |
0.999953 | de70ac3560a64b0dac3796bfa46e11f9 | Same as in Fig. <ref>, but for the reduced function Q(α). | cond | mat0411221-fig5.jpg |
0.999953 | e1978b6a6db74c66bc94f942bd350f5b | Same as in Fig. <ref>, but for the reduced function R(α). | cond | mat0411221-fig6.jpg |
0.999953 | 937453970a58425e8afb7447768e649a | Dispersion relations in the three-dimensional case for α_11=α_22=α_12≡α=0.9, σ_1=σ_2, x_1=0.2, and m_1/m_2=4. From top to bottom the curves correspond to the shear modes and the remaining four longitudinal modes. The solid lines are the results derived for IMM while the dashed lines refer to the results for IHS. | cond | mat0411221-fig7.jpg |
0.446962 | 170382bbf5584bffadd6b78b5a5194c2 | Band structure for atomic motion in the periodic potential Eq. (<ref>). Quasi-momentum conservation and energy conservation is fulfilled in the crosses where two atoms with momentum k_0 collide and separate at momenta k_1 and k_2 illustrated in the figure. | cond | mat0411228-figure1.jpg |
0.465731 | 13a6cdf3a7ec4c31aeeab3dd35026b22 | Population of different momentum components (a): P_k_0(t), (b): P_k_1(t) and (c): P_k_2(t) as a function of time and as function of the seeding wave vector k_1. The calculations are performed with a potential modulation β=1/2, N=100000 atoms, and an initial wave vector of k_0=0.672k_L. When (k_0,k_1,k_2) fulfill the phase-matching conditions in Eq. (<ref>) and (<ref>), which is the case for k_1=0.289 k_L,1.055k_L, the condensate originally having wave vector k_0 is efficiently transferred into a set of atomic clouds with wave vectors k_1 and k_2. | cond | mat0411228-figure2.jpg |
0.497982 | d13abe18fc9e445daeae57e3fd8ac1e9 | Identification of momentum states (k_0,k_1,k_2) fulfilling the phase-matching condition. Crosses: sets of phase-matched values (k_0, k_1, k_2) identified by numerical solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (<ref>). Full line: phase-matching condition derived from band structure based on simple linear Schrödinger equation. Dashed line: phase-matching condition when the effects of interactions have been included as in Eq. (<ref>). Although the simple band structure calculations are not exact theories for the phase-matching condition there is still excellent agreement with the full mean-field calculation. | cond | mat0411228-figure3.jpg |
0.526244 | fb8e8363c35940b0855fc4c880882a83 | The condensate evolution based on the Gross Pitaevskii equation for sets of phase-matched wave vectors: (a): P_k_0=0.672k_L(t), (b): P_k_1=1.055k_L(t) and (c): P_k_2=0.289k_L(t) for β=1/2 and N=100000. The evolution of the phase-matched components of the condensate with half the number of atoms (N=50000) is shown in (d): P_k_0=0.672k_L(t), (e): P_k_1=1.047k_L(t) and (f): P_k_2=0.297k_L(t). Half the oscillation frequency is observed since the oscillation frequency is proportional to the number of atoms. | cond | mat0411228-figure4.jpg |
0.562021 | 93dc3be1b9b046788a05e45f36e954b2 | The phase diagram T/J versus J_K/J for several values of a showing the phases SG (spin glass), FERRO (ferromagnetism) and KONDO (the Kondo state). In the region SG+FERRO there is the coexistence between SG and FERRO. The first order transition is represented by the dashed line. The dotted means the "pure" Kondo temperature <cit.>. | cond | mat0411229-magalhaes-538-f1.jpg |
0.424159 | 109ec54e139e401b83ad449d9ef559bd | Energy of the lateral motion a free electron in a quantum ring as a function of the charge λ of the central wire. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-0rho.jpg |
0.447691 | a8b3df984a1f4cee835c32f491dd8314 | Energy of a free electron in three different two-dimensional quantum rings as a function of the positive charge of the central wire λ. Numerical results and analytical estimations are shown. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-15.jpg |
0.492533 | 8ecb3d6be5454b3389e978d48e1a3eb5 | Binding energy of an electron to an impurity center in a two-dimensional quantum ring as a function of the charge of the central wire. Numerical results and analytical estimates are shown. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-23.jpg |
0.459003 | ae2d6b267a0a4d99960c22e8eeefbf22 | Binding energy E_ b as a function of the position of the impurity center for quantum ring (A) λ=4.3 of the central wire. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-3b1f.jpg |
0.403571 | c0bddec3ac9848ada039ac65ded52baa | Binding energy E_ b as a function of the radial position of the impurity center ρ_0 for quantum ring (A) for λ=0 and for different displacements z_0=0, z_0=d/2 and the corresponding 2D quantum ring (d=0). Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-d0af.jpg |
0.490378 | 4a990b776c24445ea5a621c3749365b6 | Quantum ring (B): same as Figure <ref> and a 3D curve for λ=10, z_0=0. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-d0bf.jpg |
0.494704 | daa24dbc93174e41b608dfae3837d972 | Binding energy E_ b as a function of the radial position of the impurity center ρ_0 for quantum ring (A) for z_0=0 for several different values of the linear charge density λ of the central wire. Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-d0f.jpg |
0.556698 | db25d9232f8b4ca7af338203f653c1b3 | Binding energy E_ b as a function of the central wire charge λ for the different impurity positions ρ_0, z_0 in the quantum ring (A). Effective atomic units are used. | cond | mat0411230-efa.jpg |
0.413904 | 8dfec64e7d404b9c8dd64e9b608575c0 | Penetration depth vs (a) scaled total drop distance and (b-d) scaled free-fall height. In (a), the exponents for sphere density, sphere diameter, and total drop distance are taken from the fits of Figs. <ref>-<ref>. In (b), the exponents are taken from the fits of Figs. <ref>-<ref>. In (c), the exponents are taken according to the final prescription of Ref. <cit.>. In (d), the exponents are taken such that the x-axis is a length scale proportional to impact momentum. In (b-d), d_∘ v is a fitting parameter from Fig. <ref> that is systematically different from the penetration depth at zero impact speed. | cond | mat0411231-Collapse.jpg |
0.457639 | d11524c6271545ea9d7a869e5dc733b0 | All the penetration depth data of Fig. <ref>, vs total drop distance, both scaled by minimum penetration depth. The data all collapse onto d/d_∘=(H/d_∘)^1/3 (solid blue curve), expected from Eqs. (1-2). The characteristic length scale, d_∘, scales with projectile diameter and the 3/4 power of projectile density (inset, solid blue curve). By comparison, d/d_∘=(H/d_∘)^1/2 and d_∘∼ρ_b are predicted by the model of Ref. <cit.> (dashed green curves). | cond | mat0411231-DOscaling.jpg |
0.462484 | bc18f153fbb543ab9434fecf5e5c42d1 | Penetration depth d vs total drop distance H for (a) wooden spheres of different diameter, and (b) one-inch spheres of different density. The symbol code is the same as in Figure 1. The solid lines are the best fits to d∝ H^1/3. Note that the shaded region, d>H, is forbidden. | cond | mat0411231-H.jpg |
0.411942 | eb7e09adceb84d0aabac1476efb38268 | Scaled penetration depth vs (a) projectile diameter and (b) projectile density. Each point corresponds to a fit to d∝ H^1/3 as shown in Fig. <ref>. The solid lines are the best power-law fits, giving exponents of (a) 2/3 for diameter and (b) 1/2 for density. The inset of (b) shows the minimum penetration depth d_∘, for h=0 and D_b=2.54 cm, as a function of ball density along with power-law expectations based on Eq. (<ref>) (solid blue line) and on Ref. <cit.> (dashed green line). | cond | mat0411231-Hscaling.jpg |
0.488036 | 1faf765cf6664c308f402a358ff1c3ac | Penetration depth d vs free-fall height h for (a) wooden spheres of different diameter, and (b) one-inch spheres of different density. The granular medium is post-fluidized glass beads of diameter range 0.25-0.35 mm. The projectile materials and densities are as follows: hollow polypropylene, 0.28 g/cc; wood, 0.7 g/cc; nylon, 1.2 g/cc; teflon, 2.2 g/cc; ceramic, 3.8 g/cc; steel, 7.9 g/cc; tungsten carbide (WC), 15 g/cc. | cond | mat0411231-Raw.jpg |
0.391461 | 9ee8fd1e2ffe491088ff651950097f10 | Penetration depth vs impact speed for (a) wooden spheres of different diameter, and (b) one-inch spheres of different density. The symbol code is the same as in Figure 1. The solid lines are the best fits to d=d_∘ v+v_∘τ where both d_∘ v and τ are fitting parameters. | cond | mat0411231-V.jpg |
0.441012 | 98bc79d832964249ac70d3696249d315 | Scaled penetration depth vs (a) projectile diameter and (b) projectile density. Each point corresponds to a fit to d=d_∘ v+v_∘τ as shown in Fig. <ref>. The solid lines are the best power-law fits, giving exponents of (a) 2/3 for diameter and (b) 1/2 for density. The dashed lines represent dimensionally-simpler expectations, but are not consistent with the data. | cond | mat0411231-Vscaling.jpg |
0.430216 | 9645a7be073c4b84878fb09628ecb496 | Spin-to-charge conversion in a quantum dot coupled to a quantum point contact. (a) Principle of spin-to-charge conversion. The charge on the quantum dot, Q_dot, remains constant if the electron spin is , whereas a spin- electron can escape, thereby changing Q_dot. (b) Scanning electron micrograph of the metallic gates on the surface of a GaAs/Al_0.27Ga_0.73As heterostructure containing a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) 90 nm below the surface. The electron density is 2.9× 10^15 m^-2. (Only the gates used in the present experiment are shown, the complete device is described in Ref. <cit.>.) Electrical contact is made to the QPC source and drain and to the reservoir via Ohmic contacts. With a source-drain bias voltage of 1 mV, I_QPC is about 30 nA, and an individual electron tunnelling on or off the dot changes I_QPC by ∼0.3 nA. The QPC-current is sent to a room temperature current-to-voltage convertor, followed by a gain 1 isolation amplifier, an AC-coupled 40 kHz SRS650 low-pass filter, and is digitized at a rate of 2.2× 10^6 samples/s. With this arrangement, the step in I_QPC resulting from an electron tunnelling is clearly larger than the rms noise level, provided it lasts at least 8 μs. A magnetic field, B, is applied in the plane of the 2DEG. | cond | mat0411232-Fig1.jpg |
0.515475 | 96b400282a0a4e0898ca6b6a710769fa | Two-level pulse technique used to inject a single electron and measure its spin orientation. (a) Shape of the voltage pulse applied to gate P. The pulse level is 10 mV during t_wait and 5 mV during t_read (which is 0.5 ms for all measurements). (b) Schematic QPC pulse-response if the injected electron has spin- (solid line) or spin- (dotted line; the difference with the solid line is only seen during the read-out stage). Arrows indicate the moment an electron tunnels into or out of the quantum dot. (c) Schematic energy diagrams for spin- (E_) and spin- (E_) during the different stages of the pulse. Black vertical lines indicate the tunnel barriers. The tunnel rate between the dot and the QPC-drain on the right is set to zero. The rate between the dot and the reservoir on the left is tuned to a specific value, Γ. If the spin is at the start of the read-out stage, no change in the charge on the dot occurs during t_read. In contrast, if the spin is , the electron can escape and be replaced by a spin- electron. This charge transition is detected in the QPC-current (dotted line inside red circle in (b)). | cond | mat0411232-Fig2.jpg |
0.459626 | 714783f1c5b749e8af62a6f991e70316 | Single-shot read-out of one electron spin. (a) Time-resolved QPC measurements. Top panel: an electron injected during t_wait is declared `spin-up' during t_read. Bottom panel: the electron is declared `spin-down'. (b) Examples of `spin-down' traces (for t_wait = 0.1 ms). Only the read-out segment is shown, and traces are offset for clarity. The time when Δ I_QPC first crosses the threshold, t_detect, is recorded to make the histogram in Fig. <ref>a. (c) Fraction of `spin-down' traces versus t_wait, out of 625 traces for each waiting time. Open circle: spin-down fraction using modified pulse shape (d). Red solid line: exponential fit to the data. Inset: T_1 versus B. (d) Typical QPC-signal for a `reversed' pulse, with the same amplitudes as in Fig. <ref>a, but the order of the two stages reversed, so that only a spin- electron can be injected. The fraction of traces nevertheless declared `spin-down' gives an independent measure of the `dark count' probability. This fraction is plotted as the open circle in (c) and is used in the exponential fit with an associated value of t_wait = 10 ms (i.e. >> T_1). The blue threshold is used in Fig. <ref>b | cond | mat0411232-Fig3.jpg |
0.436182 | 970b0ee46ccb4373a36e5bf20f18b26b | Measurement fidelity. (a) Histogram showing the distribution of detection times, t_detect, in the read-out stage (see Fig. <ref>b for a definition of t_detect). The exponential decay is due to spin- electrons tunnelling out of the dot (rate =Γ_) and due to spin flips during the read-out stage (rate = 1/T_1). Solid line: exponential fit with a decay time (Γ_ + 1/T_1)^-1 of 0.09 ms. Given that T_1 = 0.55 ms, this yields Γ_^-1≈ 0.11 ms. Inset: fidelity parameters. A spin- electron is declared `up' or `down' with probability 1-α or α, respectively. A spin- electron is declared `down' (d) or `up' (u) with probability 1-β or β, respectively. (b) Filled dark circles represent α, obtained from the saturation value of exponential fits as in Fig. <ref>c for different values of the read-out threshold. A current of 0.54 nA (0.91 nA) corresponds to the average value of Δ I_QPC when the dot is occupied (empty) during t_read. Open circles: measured fraction of `reverse-pulse' traces in which Δ I_QPC crosses the injection threshold (blue line in Fig. <ref>d). This fraction approximates 1-β_2, where β_2 is the probability of identifying a spin- electron as `spin-up' due to the finite bandwidth of the measurement setup. Red circles: total fidelity for the spin- state, 1-β, calculated using β_1 = 0.17. The vertical red line indicates the threshold for which the visibility 1-α-β (difference between filled circles and open squares) is maximal. This threshold value of 0.73 nA is used in the analysis of Fig. <ref>. | cond | mat0411232-Fig4.jpg |
0.548564 | d61dc7650bfb41b99b2e0078988f012b | Tuning the quantum dot into the spin read-out configuration. We apply a two-stage voltage pulse as in Fig. <ref>a (t_wait = 0.3 ms, t_read = 0.5 ms), and measure the QPC-response for increasingly negative values of V_M. (a) QPC-response (in colour-scale) versus V_M. Four different regions in V_M can be identified (separated by white dotted lines), with qualitatively different QPC-responses. (b) Typical QPC-response in each of the four regions. This behaviour can be understood from the energy levels during all stages of the pulse. (c) Schematic energy diagrams showing E_ and E_ with respect to E_F before and after the pulse (blue), during t_wait (orange) and during t_read (purple), for four values of V_M. For the actual spin read-out experiment, V_M is set to the optimum position (indicated by the arrow in a). | cond | mat0411232-FigS2.jpg |
0.450599 | 2a4648c140134ee8bc87811f590f4b93 | Setting the injection threshold. (a) Example of QPC-signal for the shortest waiting time used (0.1 ms). The blue horizontal line indicates the injection threshold. Injection is declared successful if the QPC-signal is below the injection threshold for a part or all of the last 45 μs before the end of the injection stage (t_wait). Traces in which injection was not successful, i.e. no electron was injected during t_wait, are disregarded. (b) Fraction of traces in which injection was successful, out of a total of 625 taken for each waiting time. The threshold chosen for analysing all data is indicated by the vertical blue line. | cond | mat0411232-FigS3.jpg |
0.41819 | 5f0bf8405692465f9181106eb3ddf6ff | Measurement of the spin-relaxation time as in Fig. <ref>c, but at different magnetic fields. Averaging the results of an exponential fit (as shown) over three similar measurements yields (a), T_1 = (0.85 ± 0.11) ms at 8 T and (b), T_1 = (0.12 ± 0.03) ms at 14 T. | cond | mat0411232-FigS4.jpg |
0.461367 | 3f2cda79f2e8495ab01207c4dc1114b7 | Conductance ratio as a function of bias voltage for Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr (solid line) and Co/MgO/9Fe/Cr (dashed line). | cond | mat0411233-Fe_Co_TMR.jpg |
0.562748 | 4637bf3648224af3a605886fbba1303d | The thickness dependence of the majority spin QW state energies for Fe/MgO/FeO/nFe/Cr for n=1,…,11. The numbers next to the data points indicate the number of nodes in the wave function. | cond | mat0411233-qw_posi.jpg |
0.431648 | a73db1da781e4a28b93575080f463b1a | s-resolved partial density of states in the eight Fe layers in the QW film of the Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr junction at the Γ̅ (k_∥=0) point. Solid line: minority spin, dashed line: majority spin. The Fermi energy is at 0 eV. | cond | mat0411233-sdos_Fe.jpg |
0.461703 | f7f614e42fe84a23b4ed8d421aabfa99 | Snapshot of the height field of the random SOS model relative to the ground state m_i(t) = n_i(t) - n_i^0 for T=0.47 T_g. The system site is L=128. Different colors correspond to different values of m_i(t) : m_i(t) = -2 in green, m_i(t) = -1 in white, m_i(t) = 0 in black and m_i(t)=+1 in blue and so on. Note that large domains in white and black persist and change only slowly in time. | cond | mat0411234-fig6.jpg |
0.441994 | 23877ecf31684765bb41e564d5efdb82 | Left: SEM picture of a specific morphological characterization structure: cross-section of a 12 nm thick and 60 nm wide silicon nanowire. Right: Layout of a sample showing the 2D electron gas (dash lines) of surface area A=W×L+2×d×L. | cond | mat0411236-boehmfig1.jpg |
0.470852 | d03cf66a67954782ab6520a2b44b298f | (a) Distribution of S_ GS from DMC and LSDA calculations. Shaded histograms are for dots with even N while unfilled bars are for odd N; data is collected for N = 10-30 and six realizations of V_ ext, which are also used to estimate the statistical error. Though the differences are small, LSDA predicts a larger probability of non-trivial S_ GS. (b) Distribution of the difference in “spin gap” obtained using DMC and LSDA, normalized by the mean level spacing Δ. The large width of the distribution (σ_P) indicates a significant difference between the two techniques. Note that x (defined in the figure) is primarily positive; negative values occur predominantly when the ground state has non-trivial spin. LSDA is, therefore, making non-trivial spin states more probable by lowering their energies compared to DMC results. [A sliding Gaussian window of width 0.08 is used to give a smooth estimate for P(x).] | cond | mat0411242-Fig1.jpg |
0.47311 | c9ec4dae021748b1bff13fd3efb39ec0 | Top: The addition energy from both DMC and LSDA for one realization of V_ ext as a function of the number of electrons on the dot. Note the large mesoscopic fluctuations in Δ^2E around the expected overall decrease. Bottom: Fluctuation in the addition energy after removing the smooth part, normalized to the mean level spacing Δ. We see that the fluctuations are of order Δ and that they are somewhat larger for DMC results than for LSDA. | cond | mat0411242-Fig2.jpg |
0.443816 | e93bc040f9bf45bb808df5779910a951 | Distribution of the normalized fluctuations in the conductance peak spacing, s ≡ (Δ^2E - ⟨Δ^2E ⟩_ fit)/Δ from DMC (top) and LSDA (bottom) calculations. The DMC distributions for even (solid) and odd (dashed) N are quite different while there is less difference for LSDA. The standard deviation in the different cases, σ, quantifies this contrast. (A sliding Gaussian window of width 0.17 (for even) and 0.1 (for odd) is used to obtain a smooth curve.) | cond | mat0411242-Fig3.jpg |
0.381442 | 5ac13abfb3c740f68046a20955437ad1 | Distribution of the normalized fluctuations in the conductance peak spacing, from DMC calculations in the range of N = 10-20 (left) and N = 20-30 (right). For smaller N, the even/odd effect is stronger: σ_ even= 0.46 ± 0.08, while σ_ odd= 0.18 ± 0.02. On the other hand for larger N, the even/odd effect is significantly reduced: σ_ even= 0.30 ± 0.04 and σ_ odd= 0.25 ± 0.04. A similar qualitative trend is found in the LSDA results, though quantitatively it is somewhat weaker. | cond | mat0411242-Fig4.jpg |
0.481875 | 88e26b3af09a4c8ebadebade0de0e97a | The band structures of MnO obtained by (a) the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method, (b) DFT/B3LYP functional, and (c) DFT/PW86 functional. The PW91 and PBE functionals provide essentially the same picture as the PW86 functional. The calculated excitation in QMC is indicated by an arrow on the UHF plot and the corresponding one-particle states are denoted by open and filled circles. | cond | mat0411247-fig1.jpg |
0.450904 | c780ff20640e4726aab914a28df5cfc4 | Isosurfaces of UHF and DFT/B3LYP (blue/dark region is positive while yellow/light is negative). The valence B states are plotted for four atoms while the Γ states are plotted for a supercell so that their conducting character is visible. The valence states have significant weights both from Mn d states and O p states. Note small increase/decrease of d/p orbital amplitudes from UHF to DFT/B3LYP. The conduction state is much more delocalized and is composed from Mn 4s and O 3s atomic states. | cond | mat0411247-fig2.jpg |
0.381992 | d1deaee11c46411899a18f31e812c304 | The second moment as a function of time for h_ rf=0.2, 0.25, 0.3, and 0.4. Five realizations of random magnetic fields are considered for each h_ rf. | cond | mat0411248-fig1.jpg |
0.426181 | 07bd6e720ae144d7afbe555b4aea66a6 | Conductivity in units of e^2/h for h_ rf=0.2, 0.25, 0.3 and 0.4. | cond | mat0411248-fig2.jpg |
0.382741 | d63a552203f24e90bd5ded23b0510956 | Electron diffusion for ϕ_ uni/ϕ_0=0, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.04, where ϕ_ uni stands for the strength of the uniform flux per plaquette. | cond | mat0411248-fig3.jpg |
0.490822 | e4f7c28a412d42d1bcf427959407c8c8 | Magnetoconductance for h_ rf=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4. The uniform magnetic flux ϕ_ uni is scaled by the strength of the random magnetic flux √(⟨ϕ^2 ⟩). Inset: The normalized conductivity σ /σ_0 plotted as a function of ϕ_ uni·σ_0. From the top, results for h_ rf=0.4, 0.3 and 0.2 are presented. The normalized data do not fall on the one curve, suggesting the deviation from the Drude behavior. | cond | mat0411248-fig4.jpg |
0.475799 | b2a7314005c74f9c805ea120c6e462db | Conductivity in units of e^2/h for h_ rf=0.2 and W/V=0,1 and 2. | cond | mat0411248-fig5.jpg |
0.432109 | c825c481f38d404c91f764ef0b880f07 | Potential for under spin current. | cond | mat0411250-phipot.jpg |
0.565126 | 7ebfbd906f1740d9bfa1fe6ec0e56184 | The configuration averaged joint density of states and correlation function for CuAu (50-50) alloy shown as a function of the photon energy. | cond | mat0411251-fig1.jpg |
0.483271 | e3f6c6de73294dba81a9c494a98ffdb4 | Averaged optical conductivity, σ_0(ω) = S^(0)/ω, and the density of states for a CuAu (50-50) alloy. The corrections to the optical conductivity are shown in Eqs. (<ref>-<ref>). | cond | mat0411251-fig2.jpg |
0.405345 | 5c1d83b5a8d34763bedb8299551d0a79 | Averaged optical conductivity showing a Drude fit at low photon energies. | cond | mat0411251-fig3.jpg |
0.517308 | 7847d1353c73435e9114af496f9d86f1 | Inter-band contribution to the imaginary part of the dielectric function for CuAu (50-50) alloy. | cond | mat0411251-fig4.jpg |
0.499457 | bb654d626df24363b43dbba966b15180 | The configuration averaged joint density of states and correlation function for NiPt (50-50) alloy shown as a function of photon energy. | cond | mat0411251-fig5.jpg |
0.471597 | b7f7743d514f4c9eaf0f2ef3c4cf5b5d | Averaged optical conductivity and the density of states for NiPt (50-50) alloy. | cond | mat0411251-fig6.jpg |
0.425408 | cd1fcc30c0a244208a4e2e44cd3e668e | Inter-band contribution to the imaginary part of the dielectric function for NiPt (50-50) alloy. | cond | mat0411251-fig7.jpg |
0.432435 | 2567b1981da04f30bca756940edacac8 | (a) Gray scale plot of the differential conductance, dI_d/dV_sd, as a function of V_sd and V_g at B = 0 T. The number, n, indicates the number of extra electrons, counted from the diamond around V_g∼ -1.63 V. (b) Addition energy (E_add) as a function of n, determined by the size of the Coulomb diamonds in Fig.1(a). (c) Scanning electron micrograph of the sample. | cond | mat0411254-figure1.jpg |
0.460706 | e92c83e51b5041c6b5434e70ea49aea9 | (a) Magnetic field evolution of Coulomb peaks up to 8 T in the numbered range in Fig. 1(a). V_sd = 0.3 mV. The magnetic field range is divided into three parts, depending on the shell filling scheme. (b) Shell filling scheme estimated from the direction of the peak evolution in the three different magnetic field ranges. Single particle states are Zeeman splitted double states with opposite spins. Each number indicates (1) the first, (2) second, (3) third, and (4) fourth electrons which come successively into the shell <cit.>. Note that the “internal spin flip” occurs in this range. | cond | mat0411254-figure2.jpg |
0.495305 | 2abc22907a764e97b2ebc2d81f8142c0 | (color). (a): Excitation spectroscopy measurements in the one- and two-electron systems in a magnetic field in the four-electron shell filling regime. dI_d/dV_g is calculated from I_d-V_g data with V_sd = 5.8 mV, and is plotted on a color scale as a function of V_g and B. Each line from A to H is due to a state shown by the energy diagrams in (b) for the one-electron system and (c) for the two-electron system. | cond | mat0411254-figure3.jpg |
0.409291 | b390f668885a4b59a8e782e54e3057d6 | Comparison of our prediction for Δ^01 with the results of exact diagonalization(Ref. augier_dynamical_sP). In both cases, the gap is an increasing function of the spin-phonon coupling constant. Our results are roughly twice the exact diagonalization result. | cond | mat0411256-augier.jpg |
0.425043 | a0c7ff28cf614dda9426d0b69c808f16 | The behavior of the gap Δ as a function of phonon frequency ω_0 for a fixed value of G(0) and y(0)=0. In the adiabatic regime ω_0≪uG(0)/α, the gap is independent of ω_0 and equal to Δ_0=uG(0)/α. In the antiadiabatic regime , the gap is a rapidly decreasing function of phonon frequency given by Eq. (<ref>). | cond | mat0411256-gap-w0.jpg |
0.582392 | ac32d4eda9084f188981a5a2af7c81f5 | The behavior of the gap Δ as a function of the spin Peierls coupling constant G in the case y(0)=0. When G ≫αω_0/u, the system is in the adiabatic regime, and the gap Δ varies linearly with G. When G ≪αω_0/u, the gap decreases very rapidly with an essential singularity for G(0)=0 described by Eq. (<ref>). | cond | mat0411256-gap.jpg |
0.481079 | 5c1fa9670ff44340a17d4010c53abbcb | Molecular energy structure below the scattering continuum of two cesium atoms in the |F=3, m_F=3⟩ state. The energy of the dissociation threshold corresponds to E_b=0. The arrows mark the paths to the molecular states we explore, which include the creation of the molecules in |α⟩ via the atomic Feshbach resonance at 19.84 G <cit.> and an avoided crossing to |β⟩ at ∼13.6 G. Included are only molecular states which can couple to the continuum via Feshbach couplings up to g-wave interaction (l≤ 4, m_f+m_l=6 and m_f≥2). | cond | mat0411258-fig1.jpg |
0.47105 | 80f481c5037e41cbaf89bb8154e460e0 | Magnetic moment of the Cs_2 molecules. The measured magnetic moment (solid circles) is compared to the NIST calculation (solid line). The fast change at ∼13.6 G is associated with an avoided crossing. In the inset, we derive the molecular binding energy (solid circles) by integrating the measured magnetic moment. Binding energies from the NIST calculation (solid lines) for both branches of the avoided crossing between state |α⟩ and state |β⟩ are shown, see also Fig. <ref>. | cond | mat0411258-fig2.jpg |
0.483818 | 02492b671fec4cdd8f5443933cbf2717 | Remaining fraction of optically trapped molecules after a storage time of 300 ms. Initially, there are 11000 molecules at a peak density of 6×10^10cm^-3 and a temperature of 250 nK. The dashed lines mark the background loss rates in state |α⟩ and in state |β⟩. The two loss resonances for |β⟩ are fit by a sum of two Lorentzian profiles (inset). | cond | mat0411258-fig3.jpg |
0.427134 | 2abf335fc927487b80a5472b8541013b | Time evolution of the molecule number in the CO_2-laser trap for molecules in state |α⟩ at 15.4G (open circles), in state |β⟩ at 12.1 G (off-resonance, solid circles) and at 12.7 G (on resonance, crosses). Fits based on two-body loss (dashed lines) work well for 15.4 G, and 12.1 G. A fit based on three-body loss (solid line) works better for 12.7 G. | cond | mat0411258-fig4.jpg |
0.45676 | d8aba6181dd74facb49e24f41c6fe044 | Change of the effective radiative decay rates Γ_s (solid line) and Γ_p (dotted line) with the angle of incidence for a single quantum well. | cond | mat0411272-Fig2.jpg |
0.485099 | 09ecd6fa5ae94866aff01687d28416ce | A scheme of the angular dependence of the Fresnel coefficients ρ_s and ρ_p upon the angle of incidence, θ_b, on the complex plane is shown. At normal incidence the coefficients have values shown by small filled circles (the same for both polarizations). When the angle of incidence increases the coefficients follows the arrows on the lines. ρ_p passes through 0 at the Brewster's angle, both coefficients reach the unit circle at the angle of total internal reflection. | cond | mat0411272-Fig_1_Fresnel.jpg |
0.50232 | e6d2b8ebe53a4696a25a3f9dbcb2b021 | Dependence of the amplitude reflection coefficient |r_N|^2 upon the frequency. The main plot shows the reflection of structure satisfying the modified Bragg condition with ρ=0.005, the homogeneous broadening γ = 500 μeV and the length N=10,25,100 (dot, dash, solid lines, respectively). On the inset reflection spectra of structures that satisfy the standard Bragg condition are shown. To make the correspondence with the results of Ref. KhitrovaMQW clearer we chose ρ = -0.005. | cond | mat0411272-Fig_3_reflection.jpg |
0.423636 | 881b1dc5737d4f75a3944ee25ec6d700 | (a). The suspended attojoule thermal sensor at 30× magnification. The copper heater and the NbN thermometer can be distinguished in the upper and in the lower parts of the silicon membrane, respectively. The mesoscopic samples are deposited on the surface of the sensor between the heater and the thermometer by e-beam lithography. (b). Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of the array of superconducting loops. (c). SEM image of a single aluminum superconducting loop. | cond | mat0411273-fig1.jpg |
0.425262 | 7786a380ca64415cacf3a37da3219083 | Specific heat data at T = 1.05 K (a) and T = 1.00 K (b). The right vertical axis shows the specific heat normalized by its jump Δ C at the critical field H ∼ 20 mT where the transition to the normal state takes place (only a part of the jump is shown in the figure). For these measurements, the current through the heater is 4 μA and the current through the thermometer is 0.1 μA. The amplitude of temperature oscillations measured at the thermometer is about 5 mK. When the magnetic field is varied, clearly seen oscillations of C appear with periodicity of 0.58 mT. This corresponds to the quantum of magnetic flux Φ_0 threading a square of 1.89 μm side. (c). Fourier transform of the signal at T = 1.00 K. The peak at 1/H = 1.72 mT^-1 corresponds to the periodicity of 0.58 mT seen in the data. | cond | mat0411273-fig2.jpg |
0.404717 | c5fd13ff355a4f21a8dc64416a2a58e1 | Specific heat of a superconducting loop computed from the numerical solution of the Ginzburg-Landau equation in the increasing magnetic field and for three different temperatures (solid lines). Dashed lines correspond to states with constant vorticities (n = 0, 1, 2, … from left to right). Φ is the magnetic flux threading the loop, Φ_0 is the magnetic flux quantum, the curves are normalized by the discontinuity Δ C of specific heat at the superconducting-to-normal transition that takes place at Φ/Φ_0 ≃ 16.5 (a), Φ/Φ_0 ≃ 35.5 (b), and Φ/Φ_0 ≃ 45.0 (c). | cond | mat0411273-fig3.jpg |
0.413038 | 9abda72cb86d4256a4762da9a3149fb3 | Specific heat data at lower temperatures: T = 0.85 K (a) and T = 0.7 K (b). The right vertical axis shows the specific heat normalized by its jump Δ C at the critical field where the transition to the normal state takes place. At T = 0.85 K, the periodicity of 2 × 0.58 mT (2 Φ_0 in terms of magnetic flux) is observed, whereas at T = 0.7 K (and at lower temperatures, down to T = 0.6 K) the periodicity of 3 × 0.58 mT (3 Φ_0) dominates. The insets show the Fourier transforms of the data for 0 < H < 16 mT and 20 < H < 28 mT with dominant components peaked at 1/H = 0.57 mT^-1 and 1/H = 1.72 mT^-1, respectively. Note the existence of higher harmonics due to the triangular shape of the signal at low field. | cond | mat0411273-fig4.jpg |
0.410736 | f579dea825bd4f5999a5fa6ae93720cd | Schematic representation of the repulsive ramp potential (<ref>) and its discontinuous version (<ref>). | cond | mat0411274-poten.jpg |
0.490031 | 41b6de48949c4719bbaefac5d99d5f7d | Schematic picture of a columnar VBS state showing the four degenerate ground states. The encircled lines represent the bonds across which the spins are paired into a valence bond. The four ground states are associated with four different orientations of a Z_4 clock order parameter. | cond | mat0411275-dimsol.jpg |
0.442871 | b0e8b678789c4b2a8b633c1090363e3b | A modified version of the classic Haynes-Shockley experiment. A density packet injected by the emitter spontaneously splits into two counter propagating packets with opposite spin. Unlike the settings of the Haynes-Shockley experiment, one of the two packets propagates to the collector without experiencing a sweeping electric field. The time delay between the injection pulse the the collecting pulse gives a purely electric determination of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling constant. | cond | mat0411276-shockley.jpg |
0.400914 | bda2cbef8bab4f45b95bbe91764de30e | Nanoparticle adsorption per colloidal microsphere as a function of zirconia nanoparticle concentration, at fixed ϕ_ micro = 0.1. The open squares represent the simulation results and the solid squares the experimental data <cit.>. ϕ_ nano = 10^-3 corresponds to a concentration of 3650mg/l. | cond | mat0411278-ads.jpg |
0.459859 | 1e701c6b48c34c9993cffebaa1ada597 | (Color online) ac susceptibility vs temperature for bias fields H=0, 100, 300, 1000, 3000, 6000, 10 000, 15 000, and 20 000 Oe. | cond | mat0411291-Fig1.jpg |
0.476859 | 8a849abcd4bf436ca1b7d00bb71af92e | (color online) (a) M_ ZFC/h, M_ FC/h and χ'(T,H;ω) vs temperature in zero bias field. (b) and χ' vs temperature in a bias field of H=1000 Oe. Dots indicate the condition of Eq. (<ref>). | cond | mat0411291-Fig2.jpg |
0.47367 | 6340e640d0dc48ef8255df7b99be1645 | (Color online) [χ_ eq-χ'(τ)]/χ_ eq vs time on a double logarithmic scale. The lines are fits to a power law for H=0 and 300 Oe or to a stretched-exponential for H=1000, 2000 and 3000 Oe. Inset: the sets of (T,H) determined by Eq. (<ref>) for τ(T;H) equal to 9.4·10^-1, 3.1·10^-1, 9.4·10^-2, 3.1·10^-2, 9.4·10^-3, 2.8·10^-3, 9.4·10^-4 s (left to right). | cond | mat0411291-Fig3.jpg |
0.449284 | 43f05dff037e4462b2f7bace8e53a6a0 | (Color online) Test for critical dynamics assuming that the spin glass transition temperature (H)=T(τ;H)/[1+(τ/t_0)^-1/zν] [Eq. (<ref>)] changes with τ for each H as explained in the text. The inset shows τ vs T(τ;H=0)/-1 with =(H=0)=22.3 K on a log-log scale. | cond | mat0411291-Fig4.jpg |
0.508852 | 128244b7a99e4b6a8eeb4de20c934436 | (Color online) The scaling plots of (T/T_c)lnτ(T;H) vs a_ eff ln(1-T/) - lnH with a_ eff=0.25. Open (filled) symbols mark temperatures ≥ (<) 0.7. | cond | mat0411291-Fig5.jpg |
0.524709 | cc747697f2154c1c958a393cb93f52ec | Crystal structure of NDMAP in projection onto the (ac) crystallographic plane and the geometry of the present experiment. Only the N- (small balls) and Ni-ions (large balls) are shown. The local magnetic anisotropy axes x and z are tilted in the (ac) plane by α=16^∘ relative to the c axis. The tilt direction is opposite for type-A and type-B chains. The field H is applied at an angle ψ relative to the c axis of the crystal and forms unequal angles ϕ_A and ϕ_B with the anisotropy axes z_A and z_B, respectively. | cond | mat0411293-fig1.jpg |
0.483993 | 2cbcf478df9f46a0810a6de45780cf51 | Main panels: field dependence of two magnetic Bragg peak intensities measured in NDMAP at T=35 mK. The magnetic field is applied in the (a,c) crystallographic plane at an angle 14.2^∘ to the c axis. The solid lines are as described in the text. Insets: h-scans across the two magnetic Bragg peaks at H=6 T. | cond | mat0411293-fig2.jpg |
0.46435 | d691fa5215fa428b90749d04cbab85ad | A few vortices in a sample of the size L=22.4 ξ, (a). The phase profile of the order parameter is shown in (b). The phase changes by 2π around each core at any magnetic field. | cond | mat0411298-fig1.jpg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.