text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
appear to be highly susceptible, including certain natives, e.g., wax-myrtle, strangler-fig, |
myrsine, swamp bay, and wild-coffee. Control can be accomplished in part by following regular |
subcanopy management recommendations – cutting and burning. In some cases, especially for |
rare plants, an insecticidal solution may be applied for several weeks to kill the scales. Treatment |
of lobate lac scale is particularly important in areas with rare bushes, especially Florida |
prairieclover and crenulate leadplant, which have been observed with infestations. |
Management Policy |
Control measures must be developed and implemented at pine rockland EEL |
preserves to halt and reverse the spread of invasive naturalized exotic animal species |
and to prevent the establishment of new exotic animal species populations |
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Page 37 |
4.6 Fire Management |
Since pine rocklands are fire climax communities, fire management, along with exotic plant |
control, is one of the most critical techniques required to restore and manage pine rocklands. |
Site-specific recommendations and objectives for prescribed fires will be presented in Part III of |
this management plan. General recommendations for fire management are discussed here, |
including hardwood control, fire breaks, prescribed burning, and alternatives to prescribed |
burning. |
4.6.1 Hardwood Control |
Manual, mechanical, or chemical hardwood |
control will be required at many pine |
rockland sites to prepare for prescribed |
fires. The amount of woody material to be |
removed should be coordinated with the |
burn team. Hardwood and palm densities |
should be reduced prior to burning to |
reduce burn temperatures. An added benefit |
is the reduction of smoke levels during and |
post-fire, and less need for mop up. |
4.6.2 Fire Breaks |
Fire breaks should be maintained or installed around all pine rocklands. Construction of these |
fire breaks is necessary to permit access for fire fighting equipment and staff. Fire breaks are also |
essential to protection of structures and surrounding properties if and when wildfires occur. |
Only general considerations about fire breaks are made here in Part II. Their specific location on |
each site is discussed in Part III of this management plan. |
Though utilizing existing rights-of-way as fire breaks is preferred, fire break construction may |
require destruction of some pine rockland habitat. Nevertheless, fire breaks, and the consequent |
habitat destruction, are necessary to properly control a burn, and if fires cannot be set then the |
entire site will degrade, making the cost of limited habitat destruction worthwhile. Fire breaks |
should be cleared to bare rock or soil, which will not only prevent ground fires from crossing |
them, but will create habitat for pine rockland plant species and limit invasion of exotic and |
ruderal plant species (see Section 4.5.1 above). |
Management Policy |
Fire management on all pine rockland EEL sites shall concentrate on a prescribed |
burning program, along with hardwood control and installation and maintenance of |
fire breaks. The prescribed burning program must account for seasonality of burns, |
personnel necessary, the risk of wildfires, and actual application, including safety |
measures and effectiveness. Alternatives to prescribed burning will only be utilized as |
a last resort. |
Pineland with hardwood invasion |
Photo by Keith Bradley, IRC |
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Page 38 |
4.6.3 Prescribed Burning |
As discussed in Section 2.6.1 above, large wind-driven fires historically swept across the South |
Florida landscape every three (3) to seven (7) years, especially in the spring and summer. More |
recently, as discussed in Section 3.6.1, fire frequency has been drastically reduced or eliminated |
on most sites, resulting in changed vegetation structure, decreased plant diversity, and increased |
fuel loads. To compensate for the lack of natural fires, prescribed burns should be applied to pine |
rocklands every three (3) to seven (7) years. |
4.6.3.1 Seasonality |
Historically, while fires were probably the most frequent in spring and summer, they probably |
also occurred at other times of the year (see Section 2.6.1). Prescribed fires should be set |
whenever it is possible to do so, regardless of season. Different burn seasons may have different |
impacts on vegetation, but a lack of fire is much more problematic than a burn outside of |
preferred season. Dry season (i.e. the spring months up until May or June, depending on weather |
conditions), backing fires are preferred on fire-suppressed sites because they are more effective |
in reducing hardwood densities than wet season burns, especially when applied at short intervals. |
The first burn may result in temporarily increased hardwood stem density due to coppicing from |
plant bases, but subsequent burns begin to kill these hardwoods after their food reserves are |
exhausted. |
4.6.3.2 Application |
Prescribed burns should be applied in any way that burn teams designate as controllable, whether |
they are head fires, backing fires, or flanking fires, as long as fire intensity is limited. The |
application of fire is more critical than the type of fire, as long as fires do not become so intense |
as to become uncontrollable, create a crown fire, or overheat understory palms and herbs. As |
described above, dry season backing fires are preferred on fire-suppressed sites. |
4.6.3.3 Wildfires |
In addition to providing a critical ecosystem function, the application of prescribed fires to pine |
rockland fragments serves as protection to structures and people who live or work near the |
fragments. Many fragments have dangerously high fuel loads. Wildfires started by arson or by |
accident can create dangerous conditions and can result in destruction of property, including |
homes, and even loss of life. Wildfires are much more difficult for firefighters to manage than |
prescribed fires. Wildfires may not even be reached by emergency personnel quickly enough to |
prevent loss of property or life. |
In addition to collateral, off-site damage, wildfires can cause unexpected damage on county |
owned pine rockland fragments. Emergency personnel regularly install fire lines with bulldozers |
or bombardiers to fight wildfires, or even clear areas of habitat, resulting in loss of habitat and |
opportunities for invasion of exotic pest plants. Regular use of prescribed fire is a feasible way to |
reduce the threat of dangerous wildfires. Restrictions on the use of prescribed fire could result in |
loss of property or life. |
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Page 39 |
4.6.3.4 Personnel |
As discussed in Part I of this management plan, finding personnel to conduct prescribed fires in |
Miami-Dade County has been a major obstacle in the proper management of pine rocklands. The |
Florida Division of Forestry (FDOF) has been used on all prescribed burns, often with assistance |
from the few county staff with appropriate training. Unfortunately, FDOF’s presence in MiamiDade County is very limited, and even when time allows they are usually reluctant to set fires for |
liability reasons, even though they have legal protection (Brenner and Wade 2003). Attempts to |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.