text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
appear to be highly susceptible, including certain natives, e.g., wax-myrtle, strangler-fig,
|
myrsine, swamp bay, and wild-coffee. Control can be accomplished in part by following regular
|
subcanopy management recommendations – cutting and burning. In some cases, especially for
|
rare plants, an insecticidal solution may be applied for several weeks to kill the scales. Treatment
|
of lobate lac scale is particularly important in areas with rare bushes, especially Florida
|
prairieclover and crenulate leadplant, which have been observed with infestations.
|
Management Policy
|
Control measures must be developed and implemented at pine rockland EEL
|
preserves to halt and reverse the spread of invasive naturalized exotic animal species
|
and to prevent the establishment of new exotic animal species populations
|
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Page 37
|
4.6 Fire Management
|
Since pine rocklands are fire climax communities, fire management, along with exotic plant
|
control, is one of the most critical techniques required to restore and manage pine rocklands.
|
Site-specific recommendations and objectives for prescribed fires will be presented in Part III of
|
this management plan. General recommendations for fire management are discussed here,
|
including hardwood control, fire breaks, prescribed burning, and alternatives to prescribed
|
burning.
|
4.6.1 Hardwood Control
|
Manual, mechanical, or chemical hardwood
|
control will be required at many pine
|
rockland sites to prepare for prescribed
|
fires. The amount of woody material to be
|
removed should be coordinated with the
|
burn team. Hardwood and palm densities
|
should be reduced prior to burning to
|
reduce burn temperatures. An added benefit
|
is the reduction of smoke levels during and
|
post-fire, and less need for mop up.
|
4.6.2 Fire Breaks
|
Fire breaks should be maintained or installed around all pine rocklands. Construction of these
|
fire breaks is necessary to permit access for fire fighting equipment and staff. Fire breaks are also
|
essential to protection of structures and surrounding properties if and when wildfires occur.
|
Only general considerations about fire breaks are made here in Part II. Their specific location on
|
each site is discussed in Part III of this management plan.
|
Though utilizing existing rights-of-way as fire breaks is preferred, fire break construction may
|
require destruction of some pine rockland habitat. Nevertheless, fire breaks, and the consequent
|
habitat destruction, are necessary to properly control a burn, and if fires cannot be set then the
|
entire site will degrade, making the cost of limited habitat destruction worthwhile. Fire breaks
|
should be cleared to bare rock or soil, which will not only prevent ground fires from crossing
|
them, but will create habitat for pine rockland plant species and limit invasion of exotic and
|
ruderal plant species (see Section 4.5.1 above).
|
Management Policy
|
Fire management on all pine rockland EEL sites shall concentrate on a prescribed
|
burning program, along with hardwood control and installation and maintenance of
|
fire breaks. The prescribed burning program must account for seasonality of burns,
|
personnel necessary, the risk of wildfires, and actual application, including safety
|
measures and effectiveness. Alternatives to prescribed burning will only be utilized as
|
a last resort.
|
Pineland with hardwood invasion
|
Photo by Keith Bradley, IRC
|
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Page 38
|
4.6.3 Prescribed Burning
|
As discussed in Section 2.6.1 above, large wind-driven fires historically swept across the South
|
Florida landscape every three (3) to seven (7) years, especially in the spring and summer. More
|
recently, as discussed in Section 3.6.1, fire frequency has been drastically reduced or eliminated
|
on most sites, resulting in changed vegetation structure, decreased plant diversity, and increased
|
fuel loads. To compensate for the lack of natural fires, prescribed burns should be applied to pine
|
rocklands every three (3) to seven (7) years.
|
4.6.3.1 Seasonality
|
Historically, while fires were probably the most frequent in spring and summer, they probably
|
also occurred at other times of the year (see Section 2.6.1). Prescribed fires should be set
|
whenever it is possible to do so, regardless of season. Different burn seasons may have different
|
impacts on vegetation, but a lack of fire is much more problematic than a burn outside of
|
preferred season. Dry season (i.e. the spring months up until May or June, depending on weather
|
conditions), backing fires are preferred on fire-suppressed sites because they are more effective
|
in reducing hardwood densities than wet season burns, especially when applied at short intervals.
|
The first burn may result in temporarily increased hardwood stem density due to coppicing from
|
plant bases, but subsequent burns begin to kill these hardwoods after their food reserves are
|
exhausted.
|
4.6.3.2 Application
|
Prescribed burns should be applied in any way that burn teams designate as controllable, whether
|
they are head fires, backing fires, or flanking fires, as long as fire intensity is limited. The
|
application of fire is more critical than the type of fire, as long as fires do not become so intense
|
as to become uncontrollable, create a crown fire, or overheat understory palms and herbs. As
|
described above, dry season backing fires are preferred on fire-suppressed sites.
|
4.6.3.3 Wildfires
|
In addition to providing a critical ecosystem function, the application of prescribed fires to pine
|
rockland fragments serves as protection to structures and people who live or work near the
|
fragments. Many fragments have dangerously high fuel loads. Wildfires started by arson or by
|
accident can create dangerous conditions and can result in destruction of property, including
|
homes, and even loss of life. Wildfires are much more difficult for firefighters to manage than
|
prescribed fires. Wildfires may not even be reached by emergency personnel quickly enough to
|
prevent loss of property or life.
|
In addition to collateral, off-site damage, wildfires can cause unexpected damage on county
|
owned pine rockland fragments. Emergency personnel regularly install fire lines with bulldozers
|
or bombardiers to fight wildfires, or even clear areas of habitat, resulting in loss of habitat and
|
opportunities for invasion of exotic pest plants. Regular use of prescribed fire is a feasible way to
|
reduce the threat of dangerous wildfires. Restrictions on the use of prescribed fire could result in
|
loss of property or life.
|
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Page 39
|
4.6.3.4 Personnel
|
As discussed in Part I of this management plan, finding personnel to conduct prescribed fires in
|
Miami-Dade County has been a major obstacle in the proper management of pine rocklands. The
|
Florida Division of Forestry (FDOF) has been used on all prescribed burns, often with assistance
|
from the few county staff with appropriate training. Unfortunately, FDOF’s presence in MiamiDade County is very limited, and even when time allows they are usually reluctant to set fires for
|
liability reasons, even though they have legal protection (Brenner and Wade 2003). Attempts to
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.