text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
illuminating inferences can be made from this projection; for example, it suggests that regardless of |
whether sea levels rise along the low or high trajectory, that between the years 2035 and 2045, mean sea |
level exceedances will enter a phase of exponential growth. Under the high projection, it indicates that |
circa 2050, mean sea level will be continuously above portions of the coastal ridge wherein one would |
expect marine conditions to have displaced freshwater influences. If the low projection is realized, |
then this transition is expected near 2070. |
Such exceedance projections may therefore find utility in the identification of tipping points |
where the transition to an exponential increase in saltwater inundation can be expected, as well as |
demarcation of a time horizon upon which a fundamental transformation of the coastal environment |
to submarine conditions will prevail. |
Figure 11. Projected evolution of water level exceedances at Little Madeira Bay under the low and |
high sea level rise scenarios. Mean water is the daily mean water level over the three-year period from |
January 2014–December 2016. |
3.3. Trends |
Empirical mode decomposition of the water level and salinity data shown in Figures 3 and 4 |
provides a residual signal representing the time-varying trend after all oscillating modes are removed |
as shown in Figure 12. Regarding salinity, Murray Key and Buoy Key in western Florida Bay exchange |
waters with the Gulf of Mexico, as well as fresh water runoff from the coastal Everglades, but are |
predominantly marine ecosystems. Seawater has a nominal salinity of 35 ppt, and we find that mean |
Murray Key salinity has risen by 2.8 ppt from 32.7 in 1994 to 35.5 ppt in 2016, with values at Buoy Key |
rising by 6.2 ppt from 30.6–36.8 ppt over the same period indicating that both stations are currently |
experiencing higher mean salinity and lower freshwater mixing than was common 20 years ago. Little |
Madeira Bay in the eastern coastal region is more influenced by freshwater runoff from the Everglades |
and agricultural lands with its mean salinity increasing by 3.2 ppt from 22.4 ppt in 1994 to 25.7 ppt |
in 2016. |
Mean water levels are found to have increased in Florida Bay and the southern reaches of |
Taylor Slough as shown in Figure 12. In Florida Bay, water levels at Buoy Key and Little Madeira |
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2017, 5, 31 14 of 26 |
Bay have risen from 27.7 cm NGVD29 in 1994 to 32.7 cm in 2016, an increase of 5.0 cm, with similar |
increases over the period observed at the Taylor Slough stations TR and E1462 |
. |
Figure 12. Nonlinear trends of water level and salinity at hydrographic stations in Florida Bay and |
Taylor Slough. |
3.4. Marsh to Ocean Transformation |
As described above, the MOI is designed to represent the relative similarity of a time series |
spatially intermediate with respect to two reference time series representing oceanic and marsh |
hydrology. Specifically, the relative similitude of water levels over the last three years at Little Madeira |
Bay (LM) and within Taylor Slough at stations TR and E146, with respect to the oceanic reference |
station of Buoy Key (BK) and marsh reference at station Taylor Slough Hilton (TSH), are shown in |
Table 5. MOI values of −0.21 at Little Madeira Bay (LM), 0.02 at Taylor River (TR) and 0.34 in Taylor |
Slough (E146) suggest that recent water levels at Little Madeira Bay follow the dynamics observed at |
Buoy Key more closely than those of Taylor Slough (TSH), while levels at E146 are more similar to |
TSH dynamics. |
Table 5. Marsh-to-Ocean Index (MOI) values over the period 1 January 2014–31 December 2016 |
at stations LM, TR and E146 relative to the ocean-dominated station at Buoy Key (BK) and the |
marsh-dominated station at TSH. |
Station ω1 ω2 ω3 Ω µ1 µ2 µ3 M MOI |
LM 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 −0.21 |
TR 0.46 0.38 0.00 0.84 0.32 0.58 0.00 0.90 0.02 |
E146 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.85 0.00 1.26 0.34 |
To assess changes in behavior over time, we apply the MOI to the three intermediate stations LM, |
TR and E146 over a one-year moving window advanced in 10-day increments, as shown in Figure 13. |
Also shown in Figure 13 is the monthly accumulation of streamflow measured at the confluence of |
the Taylor River and Little Madeira Bay. This flow represents a fraction of total flow as freshwater |
into Little Madeira Bay, but is representative of the annual hydrologic cycle driving marsh hydrology. |
2 |
Ignoring the nonlinear nature of these trends, one might consider a linear mean water level rise of |
5 cm/21 years = 2.4 mm/year, a result coincident with linear estimates of mean sea level rise over the 20th Century; |
however, examination of the BK data found an increase over the last decade of 4.0 cm, suggesting a recent rate of 4 mm/year, |
a value somewhat larger than current global estimates of 3.4 mm/year (https://sealevel.nasa.gov/) and an illustration of |
difficulties in applying linear metrics to nonlinear processes. |
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2017, 5, 31 15 of 26 |
For example, the large flow in 2005 associated with hurricanes Katrina and Wilma resulted in an |
increase in MOI at Little Madeira Bay from negative to positive values. Overall, it is difficult to discern |
patterns in the MOI dynamics, although it does appear that since 2012, MOI has remained largely |
positive at the Taylor River (TR) and Taylor Slough (E146) stations. |
Figure 13. (a) Monthly stream flow at the terminus of Taylor River; (b) Marsh-to-Ocean Index (MOI) in |
Little Madeira Bay (LM) over a one year-long moving window advanced in 10-day increments; (c) MOI |
at the Taylor River (TR) station; (d) MOI at the E146 station in Taylor Slough. |
Since the effects of environmental and hydrologic perturbations on the biomes, landscapes and |
ecosystems are cumulative, it makes sense to view the cumulative behavior of the time-varying MOI. |
In Figure 14, we plot the time integral of the MOI shown in Figure 13, that is: R T |
0 MOI(t) dt, where T |
is a specific day past the data origin of 1 June 1994. This integrated view of the dynamics suggests |
varying responses at the three stations. At Little Madeira Bay along the coastal interface between |
Florida Bay and the confluence of Taylor Slough, the MOI exhibits an increasing oceanic influence from |
1994–2004 followed by a stable, but still negative MOI over the 2004–2013 period punctuated by the |
2005 freshwater event. At the Taylor River station a stable, near-zero MOI from 1994–2000 transitioned |
to a steady decline from 2000–2012, followed by an increasing trend. At station E146 in Taylor Slough, |
the cumulative MOI has been steadily increasing since 1994. |
Our interpretation of these results is that northern Florida Bay has been transitioning away from |
a freshwater marsh estuarine environment towards a marine environment over the last two decades. |
While this transition appears to be essentially continuous in Little Madeira Bay since 1994, at the lower |
reach of Taylor Slough (TR), hydrologic cycles appear to be transforming from marsh-dominated |
dynamics to ocean-dominated since 2000. These shifts in hydrologic cycles are consistent with |
increasing mean sea level (Figure 12) and the onset of accelerated water level exceedances as sea |
level rises (Figure 10). In the middle-reaches of Taylor Slough represented by station E146, there |
were periods of negative MOI during 2003 and 2006 (Figure 13) reflected in a stasis of the integrated |
MOI over this period (Figure 14), but the overall assessment is that there is no evidence of emerging |
ocean-dominated hydrologic cycles. |
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2017, 5, 31 16 of 26 |
Figure 14. Integral over time of the Marsh-to-Ocean Index (MOI) at: (a) Little Madeira Bay (LM); |
(b) Taylor River (TR); and (c) Taylor Slough (E146). |
4. Discussion |
South Florida is ranked ninth globally among urban areas with human populations exposed to sea |
level rise impacts and first in terms of exposed assets [28]. South Florida is equally rich in natural assets |
with national parks circumscribing the southern peninsula protecting vital freshwater ecosystems that |
sustain both natural and human biomes. The exceedingly flat topography and low elevations provide |
ideal conditions for the expansion of marine bays and estuaries into existent freshwater marshes, civil |
infrastructure and human habitats, issues recognized by regional governments planning for future sea |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.