arg_1
stringlengths
4
5.08k
round_1
float64
2
8
ann_1
float64
1
2
arg_2
stringlengths
8
2.19k
round_2
float64
1
7
ann_2
float64
1
2
annotation_name
stringclasses
131 values
is_attacks
int64
0
1
Comments 4 I found some minor English errors throughout the paper.
null
null
In this respect, I find the work interesting, well-structured, and with promising results.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
1 Response to Reviewer 1 Comments Comments 1 Please add a table with patients' baseline characteristics, including BMI and smoking status.
null
null
Comments 5 - I recommend deleting graphs 5, 8, and 11 because graphs 7, 10, and 13 show the same information together with lines obtained by analyzing the structural change of the time series.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
1 Response to Reviewer 2 Comments Comments 1 -The paper's aim should be the same in the abstract and the introduction.
null
null
Comments 4 - In figure 3, the indication of the test time appears in the reverse direction.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
Subject BMI Smoking history A 23.2 Non-smoker B 19.8 Non-smoker C 19.5 Non-smoker D 19.7 Non-smoker E 21.5 Non-smoker F 22.8 Non-smoker G 20 Non-smoker H 24.9 Non-smoker I 18.2 Non-smoker J 21.8 Non-smoker K 18.7 Non-smoker L 21.4 Non-smoker M 21.4 Non-smoker N 18.2 Non-smoker O 18.5 Non-smoker P 19.8 Non-smoker Q 20.5 Non-smoker mean 21 - SD 1.9 - Comments 2 Did authors estimate sample size?
null
null
However, I would like to make a few comments.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
In this paper, using a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer, it is proposed to determine the anaerobic threshold using the strucchange analysis of the time series and compare it with the V slope method and the respiratory and metabolic indexes proposed by Wasserman.
null
null
Dear Authors: I appreciate the possibility to review the paper entitled "Exploration of an inflection point of ventilation parameters with anaerobic threshold using strucchange" by the authors Aida et al.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
Response 3: I described baseline load of the participants.
null
null
Dear Authors: I appreciate the possibility to review the paper entitled "Exploration of an inflection point of ventilation parameters with anaerobic threshold using strucchange" by the authors Aida et al.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
1 Response to Reviewer 1 Comments Comments 1 Please add a table with patients' baseline characteristics, including BMI and smoking status.
null
null
Comments 4 I found some minor English errors throughout the paper.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
Response 2: I redraw Figures1-2 and described them as an adaptation of the original publication.
null
null
1 Response to Reviewer 1 Comments Comments 1 Please add a table with patients' baseline characteristics, including BMI and smoking status.
null
null
s22072682_makarova
0
We are hopeful you find our responses/edits to your concerns (expressed below) sufficient.
null
null
Author Response Dear Reviewer 1, We are sending you the second version of our paper.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
Author Response Dear Reviewer 3, Thank you for your kind comments.
null
null
We have tried to address all of your comments and take action on as many as we could.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
Please, notice that our responses are provided in bold after your comments/suggestions.
null
null
We appreciate your feedback and the time and care you spent with regards to reading our manuscript.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
Having addressed all your proposals for change and improvement, we await your decision in the best interests of Sustainability.
null
null
Having addressed all your proposals for change and improvement, we await your decision in the best interests of Sustainability.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
We have tried to address all of your comments and take action on as many as we could.
null
null
While the paper seems interesting I have several concerns that I would like to share with the authors:
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
I am not convinced on your explanation on why committees would affect CSR.
null
null
We have tried to address all of your comments and take action on as many as we could.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
Please, notice that our responses are provided in bold after your comments/suggestions.
null
null
Now, we would firstly like to thank you for your efforts in revising our study and we hope that the arguments and changes are satisfactory.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
Having addressed all your proposals for change and improvement, we await your decision in the best interests of Sustainability.
null
null
However, I accept this article only for the moderating variable the authors have tested.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
The paper lacks of robustness checks Authors:
null
null
While the paper seems interesting I have several concerns that I would like to share with the authors: The introduction lacks of motivation.
null
null
su14020860_makarova
0
The article is methodologically OK and well written.
null
null
We have tried to address all of your comments and take action on as many as we could.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
We have tried to address all of your comments and take action on as many as we could.
null
null
The reader needs to understand why your research question is important.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
However, in general, we see many articles like this in the area of social and environmental reporting.
null
null
Indeed, I believe you have some omitted control variables which may cause an endogeneity issue and drive your findings.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
The paper studies the relationship between remuneration committees and CSR as well as the moderating role of independent directors.
null
null
While the paper seems interesting I have several concerns that I would like to share with the authors: The introduction lacks of motivation.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
We are hopeful you find our responses/edits to your concerns (expressed below) sufficient.
null
null
Author Response Dear Reviewer 3, Thank you for your kind comments.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
We appreciate your feedback and the time and care you spent with regards to reading our manuscript.
null
null
This study aims to explore whether the existence of remuneration committees tend to disclose more corporate social responsibility (CSR) information.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
Additionally, we have also introduced in the control variable paragraph more information to provide justifications on why those control variables are considered in this study.
null
null
Your empirical model needs to be reconsidered.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
We are hopeful you find our responses/edits to your concerns (expressed below) sufficient.
null
null
Author Response Dear Reviewer 3, Thank you for your kind comments.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
The conclusion needs to be rewritten to highlight the practical contributions of the paper Authors:
null
null
Having addressed all your proposals for change and improvement, we await your decision in the best interests of Sustainability.
null
null
su14020860_perova
0
One the one hand, the paper trumpets collaboration, joint principles and responsibilities, mutual trust, etc.
null
null
On the other, the paper also refers to vested (eg ‘carbon’) interests (38, 619), strong voters’ resistance (574), policy holdups (507) and opposition from disadvantaged groups (118).
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
The line-up of below figures in our manuscript (with two new figures compared to the original manuscript) has deliberately been chosen in response to a number of comments from reviewers.
null
null
The theoretical debates and the literature on "social contract", "public governance" and "sustainability" are vast and controversial.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
One wonders whether the notion of transformative change really warrant this evolutionary perspective.
null
null
The theoretical debates and the literature on "social contract", "public governance" and "sustainability" are vast and controversial.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
2, 3 and 4 above) in our manuscript (with two new figures compared to the original manuscript) has deliberately been chosen in response to a number of comments from reviewers.
null
null
8 Reviewer 1: A second point is the limited elaboration of the social contract, including the natural aspect.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
Such an approach could help to better see the authors' contributions and the difference of this contribution to what has already been discussed about public governance, a debate that is nowadays quite robust.
null
null
Achieving this requires and involves a rebalancing of society and new imaginaries (as master signifiers), such as the well-being economy and a Natural Social Contract, as important new orientations.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
Much of this, moreover, is action-oriented, pointing out major carriers and direction of change.
null
null
We want to note that the governance approaches advocated have been tried and tested, yielding insights for future use.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
In the given circumstances, and for the given topic, this seems very appropriate.
null
null
What could be helpful is, in your argumentation, briefly incorporate the genealogy of your key concepts, while you work with them, thus showing more clearly how you combine and transform them.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
20 Reviewer 3: The paper presents quite an interesting discussion.
null
null
8 Reviewer 1: A second point is the limited elaboration of the social contract, including the natural aspect.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
3 Editor: First of all, we would like to underline that it is ok to be normative.
null
null
The line-up moves from high abstraction level (figure 2), towards a tool for identifying options for co-evolutionary steering (figure 3), to an example of leverage points for a specific transition path (figure 4).
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
In a nutshell, to quote, the NSC “involves the fine-tuning of top-down policy and visions with important bottom-up processes (…), and takes place in a hybrid sphere, in which there is room for collaboration between governments, businesses, knowledge institutions and civil society, among others, characterized by Penta-helix models and based on multiple value creation”.
null
null
Comment Response by authors 1 Reviewer 1: “This paper has much improved, also because its scope is clearer.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
A social contract, as explained, consists of a consensual, value-based deal underpinning an institutional governance arrangement.
null
null
Our line of argumentation has been revised, and examples have been reduced to examples.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
This would take care of the remarks about case studies and examples, and avoid the impression that there's several manifestos, or a manifesto immediately derived from one empirical situation.
null
null
The paper’s general, theoretical story is very broad and ambitious, using an extensive, abstract and complex vocabulary.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
We have included a reference to the anxiety and (absent) feelings of control and competence.
null
null
10 Reviewer 1: Fourth, the section on co-evolution warrants serious re-thinking.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
In particular, it is suggested to start from a systematic review on the studies that bring together co-evolutionary governance and the issue of sustainability, discussing what is the scientific advance of the proposition put forward here and how it enriches the current debate on these issues.
null
null
18 Reviewer 2: 5) In terms of the debate on public governance it would be important to insert the discussion of co-evolutionary governance not only ideally, but also exploring the differences between this theoretical proposition and other forms of governance already discussed in the literature as collaborative governance (Ansell and Gash, 2015), for example.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
In the section, NSC is presented as a ‘master signifier’ (345) and the orientation of governance actors (536) towards the ‘well-being economy’ (Table 1); NSC is also associated with alternative business models (443) and integral and robust forms of transition (554-581); NSC is said to need horizonal governance as well as Transformative Social-Ecological Innovation (TSEI).
null
null
19 Reviewer 2: 6) Empirical cases are very relevant, but are placed as "mere examples" without delving into the challenges and difficulties lived in practice.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
It is important that the authors give more emphasis on the scientific evidences of what they defend and anchor their argumentation in such evidences, whether theoretical or empirical.
null
null
Section 2 on “Transformation pleas and approaches for achieving this” has been substantially revised and we discuss three models for working towards transitions: collaborative governance, evolutionary steering and adaptive governance.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
This paper is openly normative in the call for the creation of a Natural Social Contract and for transformation-oriented forms of governance, but the governance approaches advocated have been tried and tested, yielding insights for future use.
null
null
The argument could certainly be presented more succinctly, and there is a need for a light language wash ("with the?
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
The paper’s general, theoretical story is very broad and ambitious, using an extensive, abstract and complex vocabulary.
null
null
Because of this collaborative, polycentric approach, the papers draw on Evolutionary Governance Theory, and develops a perspective of “co-evolutionary steering of interrelated transitions”.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
What could be helpful is, in your argumentation, briefly incorporate the genealogy of your key concepts, while you work with them, thus showing more clearly how you combine and transform them.
null
null
It is important that the authors also go into the challenges, the difficulties, the dilemmas in these debates.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
And how then is the aspect of nature taken on board?
null
null
The authors cite several debates/definitions/approaches, but do not position themselves in relation to them, making clear what their theoretical contribution.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
!” (France in anger) was a popular facebook site.
null
null
In this sense, it is not clear the relationship between the propositions presented by the authors in section 4 and the empirical or even theoretical evidences presented in the article.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
All three deal with complexity, normativity and uncertainty in an action-oriented way and have mechanisms of self-correction and adaptation which is necessary for transformations which cannot be planned and implemented from the top, but which must find solutions to demands for participation, fairness in outcomes, unintended effects in order to remain legitimate and secure continued support from societal stakeholders.
null
null
EGT understands governance as radically evolutionary and is mindful of limitations of any form of governance.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
I suggest that the authors present the debate and the different definitions and then present the notion of GE, relating it to the TSEI.” Changes have been made accordingly.
null
null
In a nutshell, to quote, the NSC “involves the fine-tuning of top-down policy and visions with important bottom-up processes (…), and takes place in a hybrid sphere, in which there is room for collaboration between governments, businesses, knowledge institutions and civil society, among others, characterized by Penta-helix models and based on multiple value creation”.
null
null
su14052976_makarova
0
To mention just one aspect, the text makes little or no reference to the differences and nuances between the realities and contexts of the countries of the North and the South, nor to the relationship between sustainability and social inequalities or between sustainability and democracy.
null
null
One the one hand, the paper trumpets collaboration, joint principles and responsibilities, mutual trust, etc.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Format of figures and tables has been improved where appropriate.
null
null
With our major revision we believe we have addressed these comments, which resulted in a substantially improved paper.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
7 Reviewer 1: First, my main problem is that the paper reads as a compilation of manifestos, rather than one argumentative thread.
null
null
All three deal with complexity, normativity and uncertainty in an action-oriented way and have mechanisms of self-correction and adaptation which is necessary for transformations which cannot be planned and implemented from the top, but which must find solutions to demands for participation, fairness in outcomes, unintended effects in order to remain legitimate and secure continued support from societal stakeholders.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Comment Response by authors 1 Reviewer 1: “This paper has much improved, also because its scope is clearer.
null
null
A social contract, as explained, consists of a consensual, value-based deal underpinning an institutional governance arrangement.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Cover letter to Journal ‘Sustainability’ Special Issue: Environmental Policy and Governance: Evolutionary Perspectives Subject: Minor revisions / point-to-point response to reviewers’ second round of response Date: 14 February 2022 Manuscript ID: sustainability-1512113 Manuscript title: Transition policy after corona: The importance of a Natural Social Contract and co-evolutionary governance No.
null
null
16 Reviewer 2: 3) Make clearer and more explicit how the article meets the proposed problematic and responds to the gaps found in the debate, including raising the limits of such proposition.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
We agree that the "normative-prescriptive" tone and use of "should be" was excessive.
null
null
I suggest to improve the interface between the propositions presented and what comes before in the text.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
11 Reviewer 1: Following on the latter, my final point concerns the relation between transformative change and NSC.
null
null
For more information see section 2 on page 3-10.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
The case at local and regional levels are well developed, but the discussion at international level seems poor, maybe the authors could exclude this mentioned focus o the Introduction I'll suggest a format review in the figures and their quotations, as well as the box and the table.
null
null
This would take care of the remarks about case studies and examples, and avoid the impression that there's several manifestos, or a manifesto immediately derived from one empirical situation.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
I suggest to improve the interface between the propositions presented and what comes before in the text.
null
null
3 Editor: First of all, we would like to underline that it is ok to be normative.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
In the section, NSC is presented as a ‘master signifier’ (345) and the orientation of governance actors (536) towards the ‘well-being economy’ (Table 1); NSC is also associated with alternative business models (443) and integral and robust forms of transition (554-581); NSC is said to need horizonal governance as well as Transformative Social-Ecological Innovation (TSEI).
null
null
The paper presents quite an interesting discussion.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Indeed, it is partly a manifesto, but it also offers an action perspective in addition to an analytical perspective.
null
null
For more information see section 2 on page 3-10.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
I am still puzzled about the selection aspect of EGT, notably the specific roles of metaphors, open concepts and master signifiers play here (as objects and agents of selection) - particularly now NCS has been presented as a master signifier.
null
null
The paper’s aspiration is clear and laudable; yet its elaboration is wanting.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
The theoretical debates and the literature on "social contract", "public governance" and "sustainability" are vast and controversial.
null
null
Two, the nature and form of evolutionary variation, selection and dynamics remain unclear.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
15 Reviewer 2: 2) Remove from the problematization the "normative-prescriptive" tone starting from questions and nuisances that justify the study and from gaps in the literature.
null
null
We want to note that the governance approaches advocated have been tried and tested, yielding insights for future use.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Comment Response by authors 1 Reviewer 1: “This paper has much improved, also because its scope is clearer.
null
null
The line-up moves from high abstraction level (figure 2), towards a tool for identifying options for co-evolutionary steering (figure 3), to an example of leverage points for a specific transition path (figure 4).
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Obviously, positive and normative approaches to support actionable agendas, like ours, do not escape the yardstick of scientific evidence.
null
null
The case at local and regional levels are well developed, but the discussion at international level seems poor, maybe the authors could exclude this mentioned focus o the Introduction I'll suggest a format review in the figures and their quotations, as well as the box and the table.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Figure 2: Possible systemic leverage points for a societal transformation towards a Natural Social Contract, through transformative governance based on co-evolution across several interrelated dimensions (this figure is a synthesis of table 3.4 in Huntjens, 2021) Figure 3: The Intervention Flower as a tool for identifying options for co-evolutionary steering through connecting actor-coalitions and interdependent systemic leverage points.
null
null
I suggest to improve the interface between the propositions presented and what comes before in the text, specialy linking with the contributions and limites of the proposal to face this challenges.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
See section with new title: “Transformation pleas and governance approaches for achieving this”.
null
null
One of the reviewers speaks of a manifesto, and I would agree, but see it as a positive.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
On the other, the paper also refers to vested (eg ‘carbon’) interests (38, 619), strong voters’ resistance (574), policy holdups (507) and opposition from disadvantaged groups (118).
null
null
The question of how the NSC can help to meet and overcome such resistances has been addressed by diving into governance approaches that are capable of dealing with complexity, ambiguity and uncertainty, and with particular attention for multiple value creation and the mutual gains approach (e.g.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
One the one hand, the paper trumpets collaboration, joint principles and responsibilities, mutual trust, etc.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Two cases serve as quick illustrations, loosely underwriting some key statements.
null
null
The paper’s general, theoretical story is very broad and ambitious, using an extensive, abstract and complex vocabulary.
null
null
su14052976_perova
0
Third, smart city services should only be used to cope with pandemic situations: 18 the healthcare-system data consists of personal information.
null
null
I still encourage the authors to have a deep reflection on the legal and population acceptance of their proposal, but this can be the goal of another paper.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors than write that these services have a limitation in that cannot predict and prevent transmission of threats such as COVID.
null
null
As a result, the critical point of being identified before an infectious disease spreads was missed.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Section 2.3 has the same title as Section 2.2.
null
null
I think that is both a big oversight, and an opportunity for critics.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
I will give a clearer example from p.15, line 345: Second, the ( Figure
null
null
Regarding the content, the motivation is clearer in the abstract, and this clarifies the contribution as well.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Table 4 presents smart city projects of several different countries.
null
null
line 85) The reference confirmed that the error occurred when the formatting was moved.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors do not explain how the services they propose could be integrated with existing ones (e.g.
null
null
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Several different plans are described, which is useless information for the reader.
null
null
I still encourage the authors to have a deep reflection on the legal and population acceptance of their proposal, but this can be the goal of another paper.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors acknowledge that not addressing these is a limitation of their research.
null
null
Line 320: according to the introduction the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2019 and here you state 2020.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
I was not conviced by the authors' response regarding my suggestion for putting 3.1 into Section 2, but this was a quite minor comment anyway, and there is not only one good way to structure a text, the paper is also understandable with the structure proposed by the authors.
null
null
Regarding the content, the motivation is clearer in the abstract, and this clarifies the contribution as well.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
First, an epidemiological surveyor should decide whether additional collection of personal information is needed.
null
null
I think many cities and countries will not be comfortable with this approach.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
However some parts still appear unnecessary to me.
null
null
In this source you can find a whole list of smart city technologies http://www.sinfonia- smartcities.eu/en/resources/d21--swot-analysis-report-of-the-refined-conceptbaseline Might be of interest for your work.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Section 3.1 gives an overview of the COVID-19 and smart city systems situation in South Korea, but is not part of the novel contribution by the authors.
null
null
Regarding the content, the motivation is clearer in the abstract, and this clarifies the contribution as well.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Wastewater surveillance for population-wide Covid-19: the present and future.
null
null
For many other sources, the local access path of the file is provided, which again prevents the reader from retrieving the source.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Thank you again for your supportive review to improve the manuscript.
null
null
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Once infected people have been identified, they are supposedly in quarantine.
null
null
I believe that explaining standard constraints (due to the multiplicity of service providers) and coupling between services in the introduction to motivate the paper would be valuable.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation (pp.
null
null
I have checked the online source and it mentions other aspects such as treatment and isolation for the recognition phase, which have not been picked up by the authors.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors argue that the smart city services failed to be flexible enough to predict and fight the pandemic.
null
null
should appear as Second, the Figure 4 scenario assumed by this study is uncertain.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors argue that this would be precious to predict and fight against a pandemic, and as such they propose a smart city structure model.
null
null
I believe that explaining standard constraints (due to the multiplicity of service providers) and coupling between services in the introduction to motivate the paper would be valuable.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Thank you again for your supportive review to improve the manuscript.
null
null
In summary, my suggestions are to focus the paper on the Korean context, in an in-depth case study approach where authors detail more their contribution, clearly illustrate what the problem is and how their contribution helps solving it.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The contribution is a proposition of services such as screening people with thermal cameras and tracking infected people through CCTV.
null
null
Smart City and COVID Webb, W., & Toh, C. K. (2020).
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The literature review is very long (it represents half of the paper) and can be significantly shortened as it contains few information that is actually useful to the rest of the paper.
null
null
I will give a clearer example from p.15, line 345: Second, the ( Figure
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors could remove the table and mention 1-2 standards relevant for pandemics and make the same point.
null
null
Wastewater surveillance for population-wide Covid-19: the present and future.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 17, 14-20.
null
null
- “This study proposes a method for timely and sequential responses, through a flexible combination of the healthcare system and smart city services by envisioning a scenario that sequentially grafts the current status of COVID-19 in Korea.” #4.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Additionally, I've included a few other pieces on COVID and smart cities.
null
null
“Additionally, smart city services couldn`t respond in-time series” (is this time series in the statistical sense?
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Unfortunately, they are enough for me to recommend to reject the paper, as I consider that submitting a report of scientific quality in this form is unacceptable.
null
null
Regarding the references, my point was that there are many references *with formatting mistakes in them*, and not that there are too many references in the bibliography.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Unfortunately, they are enough for me to recommend to reject the paper, as I consider that submitting a report of scientific quality in this form is unacceptable.
null
null
The authors than write that these services have a limitation in that cannot predict and prevent transmission of threats such as COVID.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Section 3.1 gives an overview of the COVID-19 and smart city systems situation in South Korea, but is not part of the novel contribution by the authors.
null
null
“Additionally, smart city services couldn`t respond in-time series” (is this time series in the statistical sense?
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
The authors made substantial efforts to take my comments into account, and I commend them for that.
null
null
There are also many in-text reference errors with tables, which makes it hard to follow given the high number of tables (13!).
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
Wastewater surveillance for population-wide Covid-19: the present and future.
null
null
Do the authors propose to track everyone and then go back to the records of infected people to retrieve their paths and contacts?
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0
This may be because of the error message 3 in sourcing in the document I received.
null
null
Section 3.1 gives an overview of the COVID-19 and smart city systems situation in South Korea, but is not part of the novel contribution by the authors.
null
null
su14052981_makarova
0