workspace
stringclasses 1
value | channel
stringclasses 1
value | sentences
stringlengths 1
3.93k
| ts
stringlengths 26
26
| user
stringlengths 2
11
| sentence_id
stringlengths 44
53
| timestamp
float64 1.5B
1.56B
| __index_level_0__
int64 0
106k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | Nice - I am so glad they fixed that. I’m going to have to retire that gotcha | 2019-02-25T14:49:09.638900 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T14:49:09.638900 | 1,551,106,149.6389 | 10,521 |
pythondev | help | So for my next task. I'm writing a panagram tester. And while it works when i run the module it's failing a lot of the test conditions and i can't identify why | 2019-02-25T14:52:08.639900 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:52:08.639900 | 1,551,106,328.6399 | 10,522 |
pythondev | help | Here It is | 2019-02-25T14:52:14.640200 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:52:14.640200 | 1,551,106,334.6402 | 10,523 |
pythondev | help | def is_pangram(sentence):
alphabet = ''
alph = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"
sentence = input("What is the string we would like to test?")
for i in sentence:
if i in alph:
alphabet += i
else:
pass
alphabet = alphabet.lower()
if "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" in alphabet:
return True
else:
return False
print(is_pangram(sentence = '')) | 2019-02-25T14:52:18.640400 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:52:18.640400 | 1,551,106,338.6404 | 10,524 |
pythondev | help | So i'm not sure if it's similar to earlier. I tried just calling sentence as is, in my print statement. and then i tried to just use a default argument instead in the def statement but that also didn't work | 2019-02-25T14:53:26.641700 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:53:26.641700 | 1,551,106,406.6417 | 10,525 |
pythondev | help | Update -- I defined sentence outside of the function and that helped out. But i'm still failing 4/10 cases | 2019-02-25T14:54:45.642300 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:54:45.642300 | 1,551,106,485.6423 | 10,526 |
pythondev | help | Please use the snippet feature, or backticks, when sharing code. You can do so by clicking on the :heavy_plus_sign: on the left of the input box for a snippet.
For more information on snippets click <https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/204145658-Create-a-snippet|here>.
For more information on inline code formatting with backticks click <https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/202288908-Format-your-messages#inline-code|here>. | 2019-02-25T14:55:09.642600 | Leana | pythondev_help_Leana_2019-02-25T14:55:09.642600 | 1,551,106,509.6426 | 10,527 |
pythondev | help | Very cool. Thank You | 2019-02-25T14:56:12.643400 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:56:12.643400 | 1,551,106,572.6434 | 10,528 |
pythondev | help | You seem to be expecting that the `alphabet` string will remove duplicates and sort itself automatically, or else you're misunderstanding how `in` works. | 2019-02-25T14:56:48.644300 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T14:56:48.644300 | 1,551,106,608.6443 | 10,529 |
pythondev | help | Good point. I know how to fix the duplicates | 2019-02-25T14:57:41.645100 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:57:41.645100 | 1,551,106,661.6451 | 10,530 |
pythondev | help | I thought by using "in" the order wouldn't matter | 2019-02-25T14:57:59.645700 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:57:59.645700 | 1,551,106,679.6457 | 10,531 |
pythondev | help | Do i need to make a list of each alphabet character? That would work, right? | 2019-02-25T14:58:12.646100 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T14:58:12.646100 | 1,551,106,692.6461 | 10,532 |
pythondev | help | For strings, `in` does a substring match, like finding a word in a sentence. | 2019-02-25T14:58:46.646500 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T14:58:46.646500 | 1,551,106,726.6465 | 10,533 |
pythondev | help | Personally I'd be thinking a `set` would be the easiest way to go. | 2019-02-25T14:59:29.647100 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T14:59:29.647100 | 1,551,106,769.6471 | 10,534 |
pythondev | help | So will this work? Although i imagine there's probably a much better way | 2019-02-25T15:01:06.647300 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:01:06.647300 | 1,551,106,866.6473 | 10,535 |
pythondev | help | Afraid not... `in` just doesn't do that. You'd need to loop over each letter and check it one at a time. | 2019-02-25T15:01:44.648100 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T15:01:44.648100 | 1,551,106,904.6481 | 10,536 |
pythondev | help | So if i'm looping then i can have it as one big string again, right? | 2019-02-25T15:02:20.648700 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:02:20.648700 | 1,551,106,940.6487 | 10,537 |
pythondev | help | Yes | 2019-02-25T15:02:35.648900 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T15:02:35.648900 | 1,551,106,955.6489 | 10,538 |
pythondev | help | also you don’t want to put the `= ''` in your method call. that is calling is_pangram with the empty string every time | 2019-02-25T15:03:01.649300 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:03:01.649300 | 1,551,106,981.6493 | 10,539 |
pythondev | help | just call `is_pangram(sentence)` | 2019-02-25T15:03:22.649700 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:03:22.649700 | 1,551,107,002.6497 | 10,540 |
pythondev | help | :taco: <@Sasha> | 2019-02-25T15:04:06.650000 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:04:06.650000 | 1,551,107,046.65 | 10,541 |
pythondev | help | Would this work? | 2019-02-25T15:08:02.650100 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:08:02.650100 | 1,551,107,282.6501 | 10,542 |
pythondev | help | Also, doing it this way there's no longer a reason to be wary of duplicates in alphabet, right? | 2019-02-25T15:08:24.650900 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:08:24.650900 | 1,551,107,304.6509 | 10,543 |
pythondev | help | I don't think string subtraction is a thing, unfortunately, in your `test -= i` line. | 2019-02-25T15:09:40.651800 | Sasha | pythondev_help_Sasha_2019-02-25T15:09:40.651800 | 1,551,107,380.6518 | 10,544 |
pythondev | help | Oh. Man | 2019-02-25T15:09:56.652300 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:09:56.652300 | 1,551,107,396.6523 | 10,545 |
pythondev | help | Also i'm getting a syntax error for 'is not in'. How do we say that in python? | 2019-02-25T15:10:17.653200 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:10:17.653200 | 1,551,107,417.6532 | 10,546 |
pythondev | help | just "not in" | 2019-02-25T15:10:28.653800 | Carlo | pythondev_help_Carlo_2019-02-25T15:10:28.653800 | 1,551,107,428.6538 | 10,547 |
pythondev | help | ^ | 2019-02-25T15:10:34.654100 | Carmen | pythondev_help_Carmen_2019-02-25T15:10:34.654100 | 1,551,107,434.6541 | 10,548 |
pythondev | help | "is" is an identity test | 2019-02-25T15:11:20.654900 | Carlo | pythondev_help_Carlo_2019-02-25T15:11:20.654900 | 1,551,107,480.6549 | 10,549 |
pythondev | help | So i rewrote it. But i think the second if statement is redundant, and doesn't solve the issue of things being out of order | 2019-02-25T15:15:36.656900 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:15:36.656900 | 1,551,107,736.6569 | 10,550 |
pythondev | help | <@Demetrice> you don’t need to do all of the work you are doing (perhaps) if a pangram is defined as having at least every letter from the alphabet, but can have duplicates (an maybe even other stuff) you don’t need to create your alphabet. Conceptually all you need is to see if all of your test characters (the real alphabet) exist in your sentence. If they do - return true, if you can’t find one - return false | 2019-02-25T15:16:25.658100 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:16:25.658100 | 1,551,107,785.6581 | 10,551 |
pythondev | help | think about that a little and see if it changes your algorithm | 2019-02-25T15:16:40.658600 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:16:40.658600 | 1,551,107,800.6586 | 10,552 |
pythondev | help | Then we can talk about more performant, pythonic ways to do it, if you want | 2019-02-25T15:16:57.659100 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:16:57.659100 | 1,551,107,817.6591 | 10,553 |
pythondev | help | This message was deleted. | 2019-02-25T15:27:50.659400 | Alejandrina | pythondev_help_Alejandrina_2019-02-25T15:27:50.659400 | 1,551,108,470.6594 | 10,554 |
pythondev | help | What is the recommened choices for configuring the python interpreter for pycharm. venv or conda for envs and for the system interpreter | 2019-02-25T15:29:26.662000 | Clayton | pythondev_help_Clayton_2019-02-25T15:29:26.662000 | 1,551,108,566.662 | 10,555 |
pythondev | help | you forgot `()` after your call to `lower` so `for i not in sentence` is trying to run on the build-in method `lower` not the string returned from a call to `lower()` | 2019-02-25T15:29:29.662100 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:29:29.662100 | 1,551,108,569.6621 | 10,556 |
pythondev | help | That looks _much_ better | 2019-02-25T15:29:48.662500 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T15:29:48.662500 | 1,551,108,588.6625 | 10,557 |
pythondev | help | I recommend removing the `else`, it's confusing. | 2019-02-25T15:30:06.663000 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T15:30:06.663000 | 1,551,108,606.663 | 10,558 |
pythondev | help | But otherwise that is exactly what I was hoping you would get | 2019-02-25T15:30:08.663200 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:30:08.663200 | 1,551,108,608.6632 | 10,559 |
pythondev | help | If you want to go for really performant, take a look at `set` comparisons | 2019-02-25T15:30:24.663600 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:30:24.663600 | 1,551,108,624.6636 | 10,560 |
pythondev | help | Hey thanks you guys a ton for all the help | 2019-02-25T15:31:18.663900 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:31:18.663900 | 1,551,108,678.6639 | 10,561 |
pythondev | help | I'm not sure what set comparrisions are but i'll do some reading on it really quickly | 2019-02-25T15:31:34.664300 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:31:34.664300 | 1,551,108,694.6643 | 10,562 |
pythondev | help | ^ this, just return true at the end of the function. If it were false it would have already short-circuited and returned | 2019-02-25T15:31:50.664400 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:31:50.664400 | 1,551,108,710.6644 | 10,563 |
pythondev | help | :taco: <@Demetrice> for sticking with it | 2019-02-25T15:32:20.664800 | Clemmie | pythondev_help_Clemmie_2019-02-25T15:32:20.664800 | 1,551,108,740.6648 | 10,564 |
pythondev | help | I do venvs; PyCharm's pretty good about picking them up. | 2019-02-25T15:36:35.664900 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T15:36:35.664900 | 1,551,108,995.6649 | 10,565 |
pythondev | help | Conda's probably "better". | 2019-02-25T15:36:44.665100 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T15:36:44.665100 | 1,551,109,004.6651 | 10,566 |
pythondev | help | :taco: <@Clemmie> :taco: <@Carlo> :taco: <@Sasha> :taco:<@Lillia>. Thank you all for the guidance | 2019-02-25T15:38:46.666500 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:38:46.666500 | 1,551,109,126.6665 | 10,567 |
pythondev | help | I'm actually gonna be here all day. I have so much ground to cover | 2019-02-25T15:39:10.667300 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:39:10.667300 | 1,551,109,150.6673 | 10,568 |
pythondev | help | don't worry | 2019-02-25T15:39:18.667600 | Carlo | pythondev_help_Carlo_2019-02-25T15:39:18.667600 | 1,551,109,158.6676 | 10,569 |
pythondev | help | :taco: <@Lloyd> <@Carlo> <@Sasha> <@Lillia> Even my taco syntax was incorrect lol | 2019-02-25T15:39:51.668400 | Demetrice | pythondev_help_Demetrice_2019-02-25T15:39:51.668400 | 1,551,109,191.6684 | 10,570 |
pythondev | help | Starting a new job in a couple weeks; I will have to introduce this taco thing. | 2019-02-25T15:41:17.669000 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T15:41:17.669000 | 1,551,109,277.669 | 10,571 |
pythondev | help | Thanks! | 2019-02-25T16:15:01.669500 | Granville | pythondev_help_Granville_2019-02-25T16:15:01.669500 | 1,551,111,301.6695 | 10,572 |
pythondev | help | I'm having a git issue :confused: | 2019-02-25T17:49:52.670000 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:49:52.670000 | 1,551,116,992.67 | 10,573 |
pythondev | help | git got you? | 2019-02-25T17:50:14.670700 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:50:14.670700 | 1,551,117,014.6707 | 10,574 |
pythondev | help | I commit changes but got a warning a file was too big - I deleted it and tried again but it keeps saying the same error like the file is still there | 2019-02-25T17:50:29.671100 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:50:29.671100 | 1,551,117,029.6711 | 10,575 |
pythondev | help | github | 2019-02-25T17:50:31.671300 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:50:31.671300 | 1,551,117,031.6713 | 10,576 |
pythondev | help | i then did git stash and tried again but just getting the same | 2019-02-25T17:51:06.671800 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:51:06.671800 | 1,551,117,066.6718 | 10,577 |
pythondev | help | is there a way to clear it and start again without losing my local changes | 2019-02-25T17:51:37.672400 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:51:37.672400 | 1,551,117,097.6724 | 10,578 |
pythondev | help | how big a file | 2019-02-25T17:52:35.672600 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:52:35.672600 | 1,551,117,155.6726 | 10,579 |
pythondev | help | git really isn’t made for large file storage | 2019-02-25T17:52:48.673000 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:52:48.673000 | 1,551,117,168.673 | 10,580 |
pythondev | help | might want to either offload that elsewhere or check into Github Large File Support | 2019-02-25T17:53:05.673700 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:53:05.673700 | 1,551,117,185.6737 | 10,581 |
pythondev | help | it was just a testing file - I didn't need it so just deleted it | 2019-02-25T17:53:19.674200 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:53:19.674200 | 1,551,117,199.6742 | 10,582 |
pythondev | help | and when you deleted the file, did you delete it from the cache | 2019-02-25T17:53:24.674400 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:53:24.674400 | 1,551,117,204.6744 | 10,583 |
pythondev | help | eg `git rm --cached <file-name>`? | 2019-02-25T17:53:46.674800 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-02-25T17:53:46.674800 | 1,551,117,226.6748 | 10,584 |
pythondev | help | I tried that it I got a fatal path error no file found | 2019-02-25T17:55:33.675300 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:55:33.675300 | 1,551,117,333.6753 | 10,585 |
pythondev | help | git stash pop | 2019-02-25T17:55:48.675500 | Candra | pythondev_help_Candra_2019-02-25T17:55:48.675500 | 1,551,117,348.6755 | 10,586 |
pythondev | help | then git rm --cached filename | 2019-02-25T17:55:58.675800 | Candra | pythondev_help_Candra_2019-02-25T17:55:58.675800 | 1,551,117,358.6758 | 10,587 |
pythondev | help | it's now saying no local changes | 2019-02-25T17:57:55.676100 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:57:55.676100 | 1,551,117,475.6761 | 10,588 |
pythondev | help | ffs | 2019-02-25T17:57:56.676300 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:57:56.676300 | 1,551,117,476.6763 | 10,589 |
pythondev | help | have I lost my work? I've not done any pull requests etc | 2019-02-25T17:58:13.676700 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:58:13.676700 | 1,551,117,493.6767 | 10,590 |
pythondev | help | Did you checkout? | 2019-02-25T17:59:23.677000 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T17:59:23.677000 | 1,551,117,563.677 | 10,591 |
pythondev | help | no | 2019-02-25T17:59:28.677200 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T17:59:28.677200 | 1,551,117,568.6772 | 10,592 |
pythondev | help | Did you stash and not pop? | 2019-02-25T17:59:44.677600 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T17:59:44.677600 | 1,551,117,584.6776 | 10,593 |
pythondev | help | Yea I did a stash first | 2019-02-25T18:00:40.677800 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:00:40.677800 | 1,551,117,640.6778 | 10,594 |
pythondev | help | Yeah so all your changes are stashed? | 2019-02-25T18:01:03.678000 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:01:03.678000 | 1,551,117,663.678 | 10,595 |
pythondev | help | So they wouldn't show up unless they are untracked | 2019-02-25T18:01:31.678400 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:01:31.678400 | 1,551,117,691.6784 | 10,596 |
pythondev | help | what should I do now/ | 2019-02-25T18:02:02.678600 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:02:02.678600 | 1,551,117,722.6786 | 10,597 |
pythondev | help | unstash and then stash pop and start again? | 2019-02-25T18:02:34.679000 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:02:34.679000 | 1,551,117,754.679 | 10,598 |
pythondev | help | Yeah try to unstash; theoretically you shouldn't have been able to commit the too-big file | 2019-02-25T18:03:17.679400 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:03:17.679400 | 1,551,117,797.6794 | 10,599 |
pythondev | help | Oh `unstash` is equivalent to `pop`, if I understand what you're saying by `unstash` | 2019-02-25T18:04:32.680100 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:04:32.680100 | 1,551,117,872.6801 | 10,600 |
pythondev | help | no stash found | 2019-02-25T18:05:19.680300 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:05:19.680300 | 1,551,117,919.6803 | 10,601 |
pythondev | help | :grimacing: | 2019-02-25T18:05:40.680500 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:05:40.680500 | 1,551,117,940.6805 | 10,602 |
pythondev | help | oh dear | 2019-02-25T18:06:33.680700 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:06:33.680700 | 1,551,117,993.6807 | 10,603 |
pythondev | help | this is one of those moments you learn a hard lesson | 2019-02-25T18:07:13.681300 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:07:13.681300 | 1,551,118,033.6813 | 10,604 |
pythondev | help | I've not done a commit in over a week | 2019-02-25T18:07:25.681600 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:07:25.681600 | 1,551,118,045.6816 | 10,605 |
pythondev | help | Ouch | 2019-02-25T18:07:34.681900 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:07:34.681900 | 1,551,118,054.6819 | 10,606 |
pythondev | help | <http://sethrobertson.github.io/GitBestPractices/> | 2019-02-25T18:07:40.682200 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:07:40.682200 | 1,551,118,060.6822 | 10,607 |
pythondev | help | is there anything else you can think of to try? | 2019-02-25T18:07:47.682400 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:07:47.682400 | 1,551,118,067.6824 | 10,608 |
pythondev | help | If it's not in stash and it's not sitting unstaged or committed, then no. git will happily delete things if you tell it to. | 2019-02-25T18:08:10.682900 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:08:10.682900 | 1,551,118,090.6829 | 10,609 |
pythondev | help | doesn't make sense - I've just copied the file which I had opened and resaved it and git status is saying directory is clean nothing to commit | 2019-02-25T18:09:30.684200 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:09:30.684200 | 1,551,118,170.6842 | 10,610 |
pythondev | help | What do you mean "resaved" | 2019-02-25T18:09:42.684400 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:09:42.684400 | 1,551,118,182.6844 | 10,611 |
pythondev | help | I don't know I'm confused lol | 2019-02-25T18:12:06.685100 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:12:06.685100 | 1,551,118,326.6851 | 10,612 |
pythondev | help | Like in the IDE/editor? | 2019-02-25T18:12:26.685500 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:12:26.685500 | 1,551,118,346.6855 | 10,613 |
pythondev | help | my local changes are still here so why doesn't git see them | 2019-02-25T18:12:36.685900 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:12:36.685900 | 1,551,118,356.6859 | 10,614 |
pythondev | help | Git won't lie, an editor/IDE might | 2019-02-25T18:12:58.686200 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:12:58.686200 | 1,551,118,378.6862 | 10,615 |
pythondev | help | there are defo there | 2019-02-25T18:16:41.686400 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:16:41.686400 | 1,551,118,601.6864 | 10,616 |
pythondev | help | on my server where my git file is the changes are there but a git status says there is nothing | 2019-02-25T18:17:06.686900 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:17:06.686900 | 1,551,118,626.6869 | 10,617 |
pythondev | help | wtf lol | 2019-02-25T18:17:11.687100 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:17:11.687100 | 1,551,118,631.6871 | 10,618 |
pythondev | help | I've just added `# test` to the file and the change was picked up | 2019-02-25T18:17:37.687600 | Nikki | pythondev_help_Nikki_2019-02-25T18:17:37.687600 | 1,551,118,657.6876 | 10,619 |
pythondev | help | Sounds like the changes are already committed; can you do `git log -p` | 2019-02-25T18:17:53.687900 | Lillia | pythondev_help_Lillia_2019-02-25T18:17:53.687900 | 1,551,118,673.6879 | 10,620 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.