|
|
--- |
|
|
configs: |
|
|
- config_name: default |
|
|
data_files: |
|
|
- split: train |
|
|
path: data/train-* |
|
|
- split: validation |
|
|
path: data/validation-* |
|
|
- split: test |
|
|
path: data/test-* |
|
|
dataset_info: |
|
|
features: |
|
|
- name: premise |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: hypothesis |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: label |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
splits: |
|
|
- name: train |
|
|
num_bytes: 19241020 |
|
|
num_examples: 16000 |
|
|
- name: validation |
|
|
num_bytes: 2359422 |
|
|
num_examples: 2000 |
|
|
- name: test |
|
|
num_bytes: 2368137 |
|
|
num_examples: 2000 |
|
|
download_size: 713871 |
|
|
dataset_size: 23968579 |
|
|
--- |
|
|
# Dataset Card for "LogicNLI" |
|
|
|
|
|
```bib |
|
|
@inproceedings{tian-etal-2021-diagnosing, |
|
|
title = "Diagnosing the First-Order Logical Reasoning Ability Through {L}ogic{NLI}", |
|
|
author = "Tian, Jidong and |
|
|
Li, Yitian and |
|
|
Chen, Wenqing and |
|
|
Xiao, Liqiang and |
|
|
He, Hao and |
|
|
Jin, Yaohui", |
|
|
editor = "Moens, Marie-Francine and |
|
|
Huang, Xuanjing and |
|
|
Specia, Lucia and |
|
|
Yih, Scott Wen-tau", |
|
|
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", |
|
|
month = nov, |
|
|
year = "2021", |
|
|
address = "Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic", |
|
|
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
|
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.303", |
|
|
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.303", |
|
|
pages = "3738--3747", |
|
|
abstract = "Recently, language models (LMs) have achieved significant performance on many NLU tasks, which has spurred widespread interest for their possible applications in the scientific and social area. However, LMs have faced much criticism of whether they are truly capable of reasoning in NLU. In this work, we propose a diagnostic method for first-order logic (FOL) reasoning with a new proposed benchmark, LogicNLI. LogicNLI is an NLI-style dataset that effectively disentangles the target FOL reasoning from commonsense inference and can be used to diagnose LMs from four perspectives: accuracy, robustness, generalization, and interpretability. Experiments on BERT, RoBERTa, and XLNet, have uncovered the weaknesses of these LMs on FOL reasoning, which motivates future exploration to enhance the reasoning ability.", |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/omnilabNLP/LogicNLI |
