premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Glen is cloudy.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Quillan is not annoying.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Alexis is available.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Chandler is cloudy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Glen is not oak.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Cedric is not mental.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Chandler is not available.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Kane is not oak.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Glen is not annoying.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Grayson is oak.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Cedric is not worried.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Chandler is available.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Grayson is not cloudy.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Cedric is annoying.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Quillan is not mental.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Cedric is not oak.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Kane is not worried.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Alexis is oak.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Chandler is oak.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is not annoying.
Kane is not oak.
Quillan is mental.
Alexis is available.
Chandler is not available.
Glen is not mental.
Chandler is cloudy.
Grayson is not worried.
Chandler is not oak.
Cedric is not cloudy.
Grayson is oak.
Quillan is cloudy.If Chandler is not annoying and Quillan is available, then Chandler is not mental.
If someone is both oak and not annoying, then he is not cloudy.
All not worried people are cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy or not annoying, then he is oak.
It can be concluded that Cedric is not annoying once knowing that Kane is mental or Chandler is not worried.
It can be concluded that Chandler is worried and Grayson is mental once knowing that Grayson is cloudy and Quillan is available.
As long as someone is not annoying, he is worried and mental.
Someone being both annoying and worried is equivalent to being mental and not cloudy.
If there is someone who is oak, then Alexis is not cloudy and Cedric is available.
If there is someone who is not cloudy, then Cedric is oak.
As long as someone is cloudy and not oak, he is not annoying and not mental.
As long as someone is worried, he is not annoying and not oak.
|
Chandler is not mental.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kane is wandering.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Hamlin is not imaginative.
|
neutral
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Jerry is wandering.
|
contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
John is massive.
|
entailment
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kent is dark.
|
neutral
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is massive.
|
contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
John is perfect.
|
contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
John is not dark.
|
neutral
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kane is not imaginative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is not jealous.
|
entailment
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kianna is not imaginative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kane is imaginative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is wandering.
|
contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is not wandering.
|
entailment
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is not perfect.
|
neutral
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kianna is imaginative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Jerry is not perfect.
|
entailment
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Odessa is perfect.
|
neutral
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Jerry is dark.
|
entailment
|
Kianna is imaginative.
John is not jealous.
John is massive.
Jerry is not wandering.
John is not perfect.
Jerry is massive.
Odessa is not massive.
Jerry is dark.
Kane is imaginative.
Kane is wandering.
John is not wandering.
Kent is not jealous.Someone who is imaginative is always not massive.
If there is someone who is either wandering or imaginative, then Odessa is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not imaginative and jealous, then John is perfect.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is not wandering once knowing that John is jealous and Kent is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not jealous and not wandering.
If there is at least one people who is both not dark and not jealous, then Odessa is perfect.
Someone being both not jealous and dark is equivalent to being imaginative.
If there is someone who is both not jealous and not dark, then Jerry is not perfect.
All not dark people are not imaginative.
If someone is not dark and wandering, then he is jealous, and vice versa.
If someone who is dark is also not jealous, then he is not imaginative.
All perfect people are imaginative.
|
Kianna is wandering.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Jorge is not traditional.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Kirk is miniscule.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Jessie is not miniscule.
|
self_contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Antonio is not serious.
|
self_contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Kirk is not miniscule.
|
entailment
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Ives is not yellow.
|
neutral
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Gilbert is not serious.
|
entailment
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Gilbert is cautious.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Gilbert is miniscule.
|
entailment
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Goddard is not traditional.
|
entailment
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Antonio is traditional.
|
neutral
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Antonio is not traditional.
|
neutral
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Goddard is not serious.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Kirk is not serious.
|
neutral
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Jorge is not yellow.
|
contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Jessie is not yellow.
|
neutral
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Antonio is serious.
|
self_contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Kirk is crazy.
|
entailment
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Jorge is crazy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Goddard is serious.
Jessie is miniscule.
Goddard is not traditional.
Antonio is miniscule.
Jorge is yellow.
Jorge is not crazy.
Gilbert is not serious.
Kirk is yellow.
Jessie is not cautious.
Antonio is serious.
Gilbert is not traditional.
Ives is not traditional.If Jessie is serious, then Ives is not traditional and Goddard is cautious.
If there is someone who is both not traditional and not cautious, then Jessie is not miniscule.
Jessie being not crazy is equivalent to Antonio being serious and Antonio being not miniscule.
Goddard being crazy and Gilbert being yellow imply that Jessie is not miniscule.
It can be concluded that Ives is traditional once knowing that Goddard is serious.
If there is at least one people who is either miniscule or not crazy, then Jorge is yellow and Gilbert is not serious.
Someone is crazy if and only if he is yellow.
Jorge being traditional and Goddard being serious imply that Ives is not crazy and Kirk is not miniscule.
If someone is not serious, then he is miniscule, and vice versa.
Jorge is yellow if and only if Jessie is not serious and Jorge is traditional.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Gilbert is not cautious.
If there is someone who is not yellow, then Goddard is not miniscule and Ives is traditional.
|
Ives is traditional.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Carolina is modern.
|
neutral
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is not fresh.
|
entailment
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Carolina is not fresh.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Kathie is not modern.
|
entailment
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is modern.
|
neutral
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Carolina is elated.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Carolina is dead.
|
entailment
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is tidy.
|
neutral
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is fresh.
|
contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Henry is not modern.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Katrina is not fresh.
|
contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Hadwin is not dead.
|
neutral
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Milton is not modern.
|
entailment
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is not dead.
|
contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Kathie is tidy.
|
contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Milton is difficult.
|
entailment
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Reginald is not elated.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Katrina is not modern.
|
neutral
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Henry is not tidy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Carolina is fresh.
Henry is tidy.
Henry is modern.
Milton is tidy.
Reginald is dead.
Carolina is difficult.
Hadwin is not elated.
Katrina is difficult.
Carolina is dead.
Carolina is elated.
Katrina is not dead.
Reginald is elated.It can be concluded that Kathie is elated once knowing that Reginald is not modern or Carolina is difficult.
If someone is not elated and not modern, then he is not tidy, and vice versa.
All dead people are not elated.
If Carolina is dead, then Katrina is fresh and Reginald is not elated.
Henry being not fresh is equivalent to Reginald being elated.
If someone is modern, then he is not tidy.
If Katrina is not fresh and Kathie is difficult, then Katrina is tidy.
Someone being both not dead and not difficult is equivalent to being fresh and tidy.
If someone is both tidy and not difficult, then he is elated.
If someone is not difficult and not fresh, then he is dead, and vice versa.
As long as someone is tidy, he is not modern and difficult.
If there is someone who is not modern, then Kathie is not tidy and Hadwin is not difficult.
|
Henry is fresh.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Jacob is silly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Trevor is not boring.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Marlon is not courageous.
|
entailment
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Hunter is not bumpy.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Arvel is boring.
|
neutral
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Ethan is courageous.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Ethan is bumpy.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Trevor is bumpy.
|
entailment
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Marlon is not outrageous.
|
neutral
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Ethan is boring.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Ethan is silly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Arvel is combative.
|
entailment
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Ethan is not bumpy.
|
entailment
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Hunter is not combative.
|
entailment
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Trevor is not courageous.
|
contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Jacob is not silly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Arvel is not bumpy.
|
neutral
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Marlon is not bumpy.
|
neutral
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Hunter is not silly.
|
self_contradiction
|
Marlon is not courageous.
Hunter is silly.
Monique is not silly.
Hunter is not combative.
Monique is courageous.
Arvel is courageous.
Jacob is bumpy.
Marlon is combative.
Ethan is not silly.
Trevor is boring.
Trevor is bumpy.
Jacob is silly.Someone who is eithor not boring or courageous is always silly.
Someone who is not combative is always both boring and courageous.
If someone is boring or bumpy, then he is not silly.
If someone who is bumpy is also boring, then he is not silly.
If there is someone who is boring, then Ethan is not courageous.
If someone who is not courageous is also silly, then he is not outrageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous or not outrageous, then Arvel is combative.
Ethan being not boring implies that Ethan is courageous.
If someone is not boring, then he is both not bumpy and silly.
Ethan being not courageous implies that Ethan is not boring and Ethan is not bumpy.
If someone is bumpy, then he is courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both not courageous and not combative, then Hunter is bumpy.
|
Marlon is not boring.
|
neutral
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.