premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Shelley is not arrow.
|
self_contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Lee is remarkable.
|
entailment
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Shelley is not annoyed.
|
self_contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Sherman is psychological.
|
entailment
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Marvin is not bad.
|
neutral
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Maribel is annoyed.
|
contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Sherman is not psychological.
|
contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Sherman is not annoyed.
|
entailment
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Marvin is annoyed.
|
neutral
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Lee is not annoyed.
|
self_contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Lee is bad.
|
contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Shelley is bad.
|
contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Lee is not psychological.
|
contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Maribel is remarkable.
|
neutral
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Shelley is psychological.
|
entailment
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Lincoln is remarkable.
|
entailment
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Marvin is bad.
|
neutral
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Maribel is not upset.
|
self_contradiction
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Marvin is not remarkable.
|
neutral
|
Lee is not annoyed.
Shelley is remarkable.
Angelique is remarkable.
Shelley is not arrow.
Lincoln is annoyed.
Sherman is not bad.
Lee is remarkable.
Maribel is psychological.
Shelley is not bad.
Lee is not upset.
Maribel is arrow.
Marvin is not upset.If someone is arrow and upset, then he is not annoyed, and vice versa.
Shelley being not annoyed and Marvin being not psychological imply that Marvin is not arrow.
If someone is arrow, then he is both psychological and not bad.
As long as someone is psychological, he is not annoyed and not upset.
Someone is not arrow if and only if he is psychological.
If Maribel is annoyed and Marvin is not psychological, then Shelley is bad.
Someone being remarkable is equivalent to being annoyed.
If there is someone who is either not arrow or not upset, then Sherman is not annoyed.
Lincoln being psychological implies that Angelique is remarkable and Shelley is not upset.
Marvin being remarkable or Lincoln being not psychological implies that Lincoln is bad.
Someone who is both not psychological and annoyed is always bad.
If all people are arrow, then Lee is not annoyed and Lincoln is not upset.
|
Shelley is upset.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Sheridan is tired.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is not dead.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is not crooked.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is light.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is dead.
|
self_contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Sheridan is not light.
|
contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is not tired.
|
entailment
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is not crooked.
|
contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Bruce is not competitive.
|
contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is not weak.
|
neutral
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Kiefer is tired.
|
entailment
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Sheridan is competitive.
|
neutral
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Aiken is crooked.
|
entailment
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is weak.
|
neutral
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is crooked.
|
entailment
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Sheridan is not competitive.
|
neutral
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Ramsey is not weak.
|
neutral
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Bruce is crooked.
|
entailment
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is tired.
|
contradiction
|
Ramsey is not light.
Alton is not tired.
Alton is crooked.
Joe is tired.
Sheridan is not weak.
Bruce is competitive.
Ramsey is not crooked.
Bruce is crooked.
Aiken is not light.
Ramsey is competitive.
Joe is not weak.
Alton is competitive.Someone is weak and crooked if and only if he is not light and not tired.
Someone who is eithor crooked or light is always dead.
If someone who is crooked is also dead, then he is light.
If there is someone who is not crooked, then Bruce is competitive.
Sheridan being dead or Sheridan being weak implies that Sheridan is not tired.
If someone is either not competitive or not weak, then he is crooked and tired.
If there is at least one people who is crooked, then Ramsey is not competitive and Bruce is tired.
Someone is crooked and not dead if and only if he is not light and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either not weak or dead, then Aiken is not tired and Kiefer is not competitive.
It can be concluded that Alton is not crooked once knowing that Ramsey is not tired or Joe is competitive.
Alton is crooked if and only if Sheridan is not tired and Joe is not weak.
Someone who is both weak and not tired is always light.
|
Alton is not light.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Sean is green.
|
self_contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Gifford is foolish.
|
neutral
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is polite.
|
entailment
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is sufficient.
|
entailment
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Gifford is not administrative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Gifford is not serious.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Chandler is foolish.
|
neutral
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Norman is not administrative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Sean is not administrative.
|
entailment
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Norman is green.
|
entailment
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Rufus is not sufficient.
|
neutral
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Carlos is administrative.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Sean is administrative.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Norman is foolish.
|
neutral
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is not administrative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Norman is not polite.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is administrative.
|
self_contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is foolish.
|
neutral
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Norman is not serious.
|
contradiction
|
Norman is administrative.
Keene is polite.
Rufus is not green.
Norman is sufficient.
Sean is serious.
Chandler is green.
Rufus is not polite.
Gifford is polite.
Sean is not administrative.
Norman is polite.
Chandler is sufficient.
Rufus is administrative.If someone is green and not administrative, then he is serious, and vice versa.
If someone is polite, then he is both serious and administrative.
If there is nobody who is not sufficient, then Gifford is foolish and Chandler is not polite.
If there is at least one people who is both not administrative and not green, then Carlos is foolish.
Keene being not foolish or Sean being serious implies that Sean is not green.
It can be concluded that Carlos is serious once knowing that Chandler is green.
If someone is both sufficient and not foolish, then he is not polite.
Rufus is not administrative if and only if Rufus is foolish and Chandler is not green.
All serious people are sufficient.
If Norman is not green, then Rufus is serious and Keene is not polite, and vice versa.
If Sean is polite or Norman is foolish, then Keene is sufficient.
Sean is not foolish if and only if Gifford is not administrative.
|
Keene is serious.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Jonathan is boring.
|
self_contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Eunice is not handsome.
|
self_contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Eunice is not superior.
|
neutral
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Rick is plastic.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Rick is innocent.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Rick is sad.
|
contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Eunice is innocent.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Lincoln is boring.
|
neutral
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Eunice is not boring.
|
self_contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Jonathan is not boring.
|
self_contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Aedan is not superior.
|
neutral
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Rick is not plastic.
|
contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Trevor is not boring.
|
neutral
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Lincoln is not sad.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Trevor is sad.
|
contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Rick is handsome.
|
self_contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Jonathan is handsome.
|
entailment
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Lincoln is innocent.
|
contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Trevor is not innocent.
|
contradiction
|
Trevor is not sad.
Jonathan is not superior.
Eunice is innocent.
Jonathan is handsome.
Trevor is innocent.
Jonathan is not boring.
Lincoln is not sad.
Rick is plastic.
Rick is not sad.
Charles is not superior.
Eunice is boring.
Eunice is handsome.Eunice being sad is equivalent to Eunice being superior.
If there is at least one people who is superior or handsome, then Trevor is innocent.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Lincoln is not plastic.
As long as someone is plastic, he is not boring and innocent.
If someone is not handsome, then he is innocent, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either handsome or sad, then Lincoln is not innocent.
If Charles is not sad, then Aedan is boring.
If there is someone who is plastic, then Jonathan is boring and Trevor is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not sad or not boring, then Jonathan is not superior.
If someone is handsome, then he is not boring, and vice versa.
If Eunice is not sad and Lincoln is not boring, then Trevor is not superior.
Rick is boring and Jonathan is not plastic if and only if Jonathan is sad and Rick is not innocent.
|
Aedan is innocent.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Luisa is realistic.
|
entailment
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Luisa is united.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Lincoln is not political.
|
entailment
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Renfred is not lucky.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Kiefer is dishonest.
|
contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Abraham is not united.
|
entailment
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Luisa is not realistic.
|
contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Abraham is not sensible.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Renfred is sensible.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Luisa is sensible.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Renfred is united.
|
contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Abraham is not realistic.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Caleb is lucky.
|
entailment
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Caleb is sensible.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Renfred is realistic.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Kerwin is not political.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Abraham is lucky.
|
entailment
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Renfred is dishonest.
|
neutral
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Caleb is realistic.
|
contradiction
|
Kiefer is not dishonest.
Lincoln is not dishonest.
Kiefer is not lucky.
Abraham is not dishonest.
Luisa is realistic.
Caleb is political.
Lincoln is not united.
Abraham is not united.
Renfred is realistic.
Renfred is political.
Caleb is not realistic.
Caleb is sensible.If someone is political, then he is both not united and sensible.
If there is someone who is both political and not lucky, then Luisa is not dishonest.
Someone being both not realistic and not united is equivalent to being not political and not sensible.
If someone is lucky, then he is not united, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Luisa is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is united.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Kiefer is united and Lincoln is not realistic.
If Renfred is political, then Renfred is not realistic and Luisa is lucky, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either lucky or not political, then Luisa is united.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not political and Kerwin is sensible once knowing that Lincoln is dishonest.
Renfred is lucky if and only if Caleb is united and Renfred is not realistic.
If there is at least one people who is political, then Lincoln is not realistic and Renfred is not lucky.
If someone who is sensible is also not dishonest, then he is not realistic.
|
Lincoln is realistic.
|
contradiction
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.