premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Baldwin is not guilty. | neutral |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Beverly is curious. | contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Jessie is not curious. | entailment |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Lucille is curious. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Beverly is not guilty. | neutral |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Heath is not guilty. | neutral |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Lucille is not successful. | entailment |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Robert is guilty. | neutral |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is generous. | contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is odd. | entailment |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is not odd. | contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Jessie is not successful. | entailment |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Jessie is odd. | neutral |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Baldwin is not successful. | entailment |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is successful. | contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Lucille is generous. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Lucille is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Jessie is curious. | contradiction |
Jessie is not curious.
Lucille is not successful.
Baldwin is not odd.
Robert is not odd.
Baldwin is not successful.
Ashley is not funny.
Beverly is not curious.
Lucille is generous.
Lucille is not odd.
Heath is not successful.
Jessie is not successful.
Lucille is not funny.Someone who is not guilty is always both odd and funny.
Someone being both not successful and odd is equivalent to being not generous and funny.
If Lucille is odd or Robert is not successful, then Lucille is not curious.
If someone is successful or guilty, then he is not generous.
It can be concluded that Beverly is not curious once knowing that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful.
If there is nobody who is not funny, then Jessie is odd.
If someone is curious, then he is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty, then Beverly is not odd and Baldwin is not funny.
If all people are not guilty or successful, then Robert is not odd.
If someone is not funny, then he is not successful.
Someone is odd and not successful if and only if he is not funny.
Heath being funny implies that Beverly is not generous and Baldwin is successful. | Ashley is funny. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Marcus is not combative. | contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is combative. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is depressed. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is not guilty. | contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Randolph is not severe. | contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Lincoln is not depressed. | neutral |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Lincoln is combative. | neutral |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Sherman is helpful. | neutral |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is guilty. | entailment |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Marcus is combative. | entailment |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is not depressed. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Bowen is not combative. | neutral |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Bowen is not guilty. | contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Lincoln is helpful. | neutral |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Sherman is not guilty. | contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Randolph is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Sherman is not depressed. | entailment |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Bowen is depressed. | entailment |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Bowen is helpful. | entailment |
Randolph is guilty.
Lincoln is not severe.
Alfred is not combative.
Randolph is latter.
Bowen is depressed.
Lincoln is guilty.
Bowen is helpful.
Sherman is not latter.
Conan is helpful.
Alfred is depressed.
Randolph is not helpful.
Randolph is not combative.Alfred is guilty if and only if Alfred is not combative.
Bowen is not depressed if and only if Bowen is not latter and Bowen is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not guilty or not helpful, then Bowen is latter.
Someone being both latter and helpful is equivalent to being depressed and guilty.
Alfred being not latter implies that Conan is guilty and Alfred is combative.
Someone is not latter and not depressed if and only if he is guilty and severe.
If Randolph is not helpful and Conan is combative, then Bowen is not severe.
Someone who is both not depressed and not helpful is always guilty.
Marcus being depressed is equivalent to Lincoln being latter.
If someone is not latter and severe, then he is not combative, and vice versa.
If Randolph is not depressed, then Marcus is combative.
If there is at least one people who is severe, then Sherman is not depressed. | Alfred is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Kerry is not whispering. | contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Carlos is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Norris is not quaint. | neutral |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Alisa is friendly. | contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Carlos is not acceptable. | entailment |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Alisa is terrible. | entailment |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Carlos is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Alisa is not terrible. | contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Norris is not acceptable. | neutral |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Gideon is not acceptable. | neutral |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Barclay is helpful. | neutral |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Carlos is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Gideon is not terrible. | neutral |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Sidney is not terrible. | entailment |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Alisa is not friendly. | entailment |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Sidney is not helpful. | contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Kerry is whispering. | entailment |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Sidney is terrible. | contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Carlos is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Carlos is not terrible.
Carlos is not helpful.
Barclay is not whispering.
Kerry is acceptable.
Carlos is quaint.
Kerry is whispering.
Alisa is not friendly.
Gideon is not whispering.
Carlos is not acceptable.
Kerry is not terrible.
Sidney is not acceptable.
Alisa is terrible.If someone who is helpful is also not quaint, then he is not acceptable.
If someone is both quaint and not acceptable, then he is terrible.
It can be concluded that Carlos is not helpful once knowing that Barclay is whispering or Carlos is friendly.
Sidney is not helpful if and only if Barclay is quaint and Barclay is not friendly.
Barclay being friendly and Norris being quaint imply that Kerry is not terrible.
If someone is not friendly, then he is not helpful, and vice versa.
If someone is not acceptable, then he is both helpful and not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or terrible, then Norris is helpful.
If all people are friendly, then Barclay is whispering and Gideon is acceptable.
If there is at least one people who is both acceptable and quaint, then Carlos is not terrible.
Alisa being not terrible and Sidney being not friendly imply that Carlos is helpful and Norris is whispering.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Carlos is friendly and Sidney is acceptable. | Sidney is not acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Calvert is modern. | entailment |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Chalmers is not delightful. | contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Calvert is not modern. | contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is not modern. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is wooden. | neutral |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Stanley is global. | neutral |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is global. | contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is courageous. | entailment |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Chalmers is not courageous. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Jarvis is not wooden. | entailment |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is modern. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Chalmers is courageous. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Stanley is not delightful. | neutral |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Richard is not similar. | entailment |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Truman is modern. | self_contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Nathalie is modern. | contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Jarvis is not global. | contradiction |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Nathalie is courageous. | entailment |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Stanley is modern. | neutral |
Jarvis is not wooden.
Chalmers is delightful.
Calvert is similar.
Jarvis is similar.
Chalmers is not modern.
Richard is courageous.
Calvert is modern.
Truman is courageous.
Stanley is similar.
Richard is modern.
Jarvis is global.
Truman is modern.If someone is delightful, then he is both not wooden and global.
As long as someone is delightful and wooden, he is not modern and global.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Chalmers is not modern and Jarvis is not delightful.
Someone being not modern is equivalent to being courageous.
Calvert being not delightful or Calvert being not global implies that Stanley is similar.
If Chalmers is not courageous, then Nathalie is not modern and Jarvis is global.
Someone who is delightful is always not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful or wooden, then Truman is not modern.
Someone being not courageous is equivalent to being global.
If Richard is courageous, then Richard is not similar and Calvert is delightful, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not similar, he is not modern and not global.
If all people are wooden, then Calvert is courageous and Nathalie is not global. | Truman is not delightful. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Gilbert is not hurt. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Kim is electrical. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Tracey is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Tracey is not splendid. | self_contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Kim is hurt. | entailment |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Janet is not splendid. | self_contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Hadden is not splendid. | contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Gabriel is not splendid. | self_contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Hadden is splendid. | entailment |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Janet is not hurt. | contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Hadden is not odd. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Kim is not hurt. | contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Gabriel is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Gabriel is not hurt. | contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Hadden is electrical. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Tracey is better. | contradiction |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Tracey is orange. | neutral |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Janet is odd. | entailment |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Gilbert is splendid. | entailment |
Marcus is not electrical.
Gabriel is better.
Gabriel is electrical.
Gilbert is splendid.
Janet is not orange.
Tracey is not better.
Kim is not better.
Tracey is not hurt.
Gabriel is not splendid.
Janet is odd.
Marcus is not hurt.
Gabriel is odd.If there is someone who is not hurt, then Gilbert is not better.
If someone is not odd, then he is both not better and electrical.
If someone is hurt and splendid, then he is not orange, and vice versa.
If Hadden is orange, then Kim is splendid and Kim is not odd, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not electrical, he is not hurt and splendid.
If someone is not better or he is orange, then he is splendid.
If there is someone who is hurt, then Kim is not orange and Tracey is not splendid.
If Kim is not splendid, then Janet is not electrical, and vice versa.
If someone is odd and not orange, then he is both electrical and not splendid, and vice versa.
If Gilbert is not better and Kim is not odd, then Kim is orange and Kim is electrical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Marcus is not electrical and Hadden is not orange.
Janet is hurt if and only if Gabriel is electrical. | Marcus is not hurt. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.