premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Lucille is additional. | contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Raymond is not annoying. | contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sherlock is not used. | contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Louis is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sloane is annoying. | entailment |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Kiefer is used. | entailment |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Kiefer is not annoying. | neutral |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Lucille is not used. | entailment |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sherlock is annoying. | entailment |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Kiefer is annoying. | neutral |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Louis is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Lauren is not unusual. | neutral |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Louis is used. | entailment |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Raymond is not depressed. | neutral |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Lauren is not depressed. | contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sherlock is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sloane is not federal. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Louis is not additional. | contradiction |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Raymond is depressed. | neutral |
Sherlock is not unusual.
Louis is used.
Sloane is additional.
Sloane is used.
Louis is unusual.
Raymond is not additional.
Lauren is depressed.
Kiefer is used.
Raymond is annoying.
Lucille is not used.
Louis is federal.
Sloane is not federal.Lauren is not unusual if and only if Sherlock is not depressed and Louis is not annoying.
Someone being not additional is equivalent to being not used.
If there is someone who is either not annoying or not unusual, then Sloane is additional.
If there is someone who is both not used and not annoying, then Sherlock is unusual.
Someone who is not annoying is always depressed.
If someone is annoying and used, then he is additional, and vice versa.
Someone being annoying is equivalent to being federal.
If someone is not used and not depressed, then he is not annoying, and vice versa.
If someone is not additional, then he is federal.
Someone being not unusual is equivalent to being federal.
It can be concluded that Lauren is unusual once knowing that Kiefer is depressed or Kiefer is not additional.
As long as someone is unusual, he is used and annoying. | Sherlock is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is wrong. | neutral |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Henry is medical. | neutral |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Blanca is wrong. | contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Kelsey is nutty. | contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Phoebe is not unable. | neutral |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Kelsey is wooden. | entailment |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Henry is chestnut. | entailment |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Henry is wooden. | neutral |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Phoebe is chestnut. | entailment |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Kelsey is not nutty. | entailment |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is not chestnut. | contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is not medical. | self_contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is unable. | self_contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Kelsey is not unable. | entailment |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Phoebe is not chestnut. | contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Liam is not wooden. | neutral |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Blanca is wooden. | contradiction |
Milton is chestnut.
Henry is not nutty.
Vicki is unable.
Vicki is not wooden.
Milton is wooden.
Liam is unable.
Phoebe is not wrong.
Blanca is not wrong.
Vicki is not medical.
Milton is unable.
Liam is nutty.
Phoebe is chestnut.If there is someone who is both not wooden and unable, then Phoebe is not nutty and Milton is medical.
As long as someone is either medical or not unable, he is not nutty and chestnut.
If someone is not unable or he is not wooden, then he is not medical.
If someone is both not medical and nutty, then he is not wrong.
Vicki is chestnut and Kelsey is not medical if and only if Milton is not nutty and Milton is not unable.
Someone is chestnut and not unable if and only if he is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Blanca is not wooden and Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or chestnut, then Milton is medical.
If Kelsey is wooden or Phoebe is chestnut, then Blanca is not nutty.
If there is someone who is medical, then Kelsey is wooden.
It can be concluded that Liam is wrong and Milton is not wooden once knowing that Milton is not medical.
If there is at least one people who is not medical or not wrong, then Henry is chestnut. | Milton is medical. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Percival is severe. | neutral |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Percival is not severe. | neutral |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Bruce is not severe. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Douglas is severe. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Bruce is not disgusted. | entailment |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Beverly is not severe. | entailment |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Conroy is not shiny. | contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Percival is shiny. | neutral |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Glenn is not global. | neutral |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Bruce is busy. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Beverly is not motionless. | entailment |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Glenn is not shiny. | entailment |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Beverly is severe. | contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Douglas is not global. | contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Olin is busy. | contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Bruce is severe. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Olin is not busy. | entailment |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Beverly is not shiny. | contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Douglas is not severe. | self_contradiction |
Beverly is shiny.
Douglas is severe.
Conroy is not severe.
Percival is not global.
Douglas is not busy.
Bruce is not busy.
Douglas is shiny.
Beverly is not motionless.
Conroy is not motionless.
Beverly is global.
Bruce is severe.
Olin is not busy.Glenn being not shiny or Bruce being disgusted implies that Conroy is not severe.
Someone who is eithor not motionless or not disgusted is always shiny.
Someone is not motionless and severe if and only if he is busy and shiny.
It can be concluded that Bruce is severe once knowing that Douglas is busy or Beverly is motionless.
If there is at least one people who is disgusted, then Beverly is not shiny and Douglas is motionless.
Olin is not disgusted if and only if Bruce is not severe and Douglas is busy.
If someone is both motionless and not shiny, then he is not global.
As long as someone is shiny, he is global and not severe.
Someone who is severe is always not disgusted.
If there is someone who is either severe or not shiny, then Bruce is busy.
If there is at least one people who is both motionless and busy, then Beverly is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Douglas is severe and Glenn is not shiny once knowing that Bruce is global. | Conroy is busy. | neutral |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Peter is orange. | entailment |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Alvin is not lonely. | contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is not orange. | entailment |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is orange. | contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is not bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Graham is orange. | neutral |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Alvin is not reliable. | entailment |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Alvin is inquisitive. | entailment |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Graham is bumpy. | entailment |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Alvin is not open. | contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Basil is not lonely. | neutral |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is not reliable. | self_contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is not lonely. | self_contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Basil is lonely. | neutral |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Harmony is not orange. | contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Peter is not orange. | contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Basil is reliable. | neutral |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Brice is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Graham is bumpy.
Brice is lonely.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Peter is orange.
Harmony is lonely.
Coleman is not lonely.
Brice is bumpy.
Coleman is not open.
Coleman is inquisitive.
Alvin is open.
Graham is not inquisitive.
Basil is not orange.Harmony is not lonely if and only if Basil is not reliable.
If there is at least one people who is both reliable and not open, then Brice is inquisitive.
If there is someone who is either reliable or not bumpy, then Brice is not open and Brice is not lonely.
As long as someone is not open and orange, he is not lonely and reliable.
If Harmony is inquisitive, then Graham is not lonely and Alvin is open, and vice versa.
Someone who is reliable is always both not orange and not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either open or not inquisitive, then Harmony is orange.
Someone who is lonely is always not reliable.
As long as someone is open, he is lonely and not reliable.
It can be concluded that Graham is not reliable and Coleman is lonely once knowing that Coleman is not inquisitive.
If Graham is orange and Alvin is lonely, then Graham is bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not open or bumpy, then Brice is reliable. | Coleman is bumpy. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Irvin is better. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Irvin is not better. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Jimmy is not cheeky. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Henry is not cheeky. | entailment |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Henry is better. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Hector is better. | contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Lionel is light. | contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Jimmy is conscious. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Henry is not smiling. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Hector is dynamic. | entailment |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Alberto is smiling. | entailment |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Lionel is not better. | entailment |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Alberto is not cheeky. | entailment |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Henry is not better. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Lionel is smiling. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Henry is not dynamic. | contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Travis is not better. | contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Lionel is not smiling. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Irvin is conscious. | neutral |
Lionel is smiling.
Hector is cheeky.
Hector is dynamic.
Hector is not better.
Travis is better.
Travis is not dynamic.
Travis is not cheeky.
Lionel is not better.
Henry is better.
Travis is light.
Irvin is dynamic.
Henry is dynamic.Alberto being not better is equivalent to Travis being not conscious.
Someone is not dynamic if and only if he is not light.
All better people are not smiling.
If Jimmy is light and Travis is not better, then Jimmy is smiling.
If there is someone who is dynamic, then Alberto is not cheeky.
If someone is light or not better, then he is not cheeky.
Travis being not better is equivalent to Travis being light and Travis being smiling.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or better, then Alberto is dynamic.
If someone is conscious or dynamic, then he is smiling.
Someone being both not smiling and dynamic is equivalent to being not better.
if there is at least one people who is not light and not better, then Lionel is not dynamic and Henry is not smiling.
If there is at least one people who is both conscious and not smiling, then Alberto is dynamic. | Travis is smiling. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.