premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Stella is sad. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Stella is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Brock is not easygoing. | entailment |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Silvia is easygoing. | neutral |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is happy. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Hope is funny. | neutral |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Liam is easygoing. | contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is not enchanting. | contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Liam is funny. | contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is enchanting. | entailment |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Stella is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is not sad. | entailment |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Brock is funny. | neutral |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Quinn is not funny. | entailment |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is sad. | contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Liam is not enchanting. | neutral |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Liam is enchanting. | neutral |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Morris is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Quinn is easygoing. | self_contradiction |
Quinn is not funny.
Silvia is not happy.
Hope is sad.
Quinn is sad.
Brock is sad.
Morris is not sad.
Stella is not easygoing.
Quinn is not easygoing.
Morris is enchanting.
Liam is not funny.
Morris is happy.
Liam is sad.Someone who is both happy and enchanting is always not sad.
Hope being not enchanting implies that Quinn is easygoing.
Someone being sad is equivalent to being not easygoing.
Someone being both adventurous and funny is equivalent to being not sad.
If there is at least one people who is both not adventurous and not enchanting, then Hope is easygoing.
If there is someone who is not easygoing, then Hope is not enchanting and Stella is not adventurous.
If there is someone who is sad, then Morris is not happy and Stella is not easygoing.
If Liam is enchanting and Quinn is easygoing, then Silvia is not funny and Quinn is not happy, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brock is enchanting once knowing that Morris is not adventurous or Morris is not funny.
If there is at least one people who is enchanting or not easygoing, then Stella is not sad.
If Quinn is not easygoing, then Quinn is sad.
Silvia being not easygoing and Liam being not happy imply that Brock is funny. | Quinn is sad. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is consistent. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Pierce is shy. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is rude. | neutral |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Pierce is not consistent. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Amos is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Percival is not shy. | neutral |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Abner is not shy. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Amos is not angry. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Nathalie is rude. | neutral |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is funny. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is angry. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Amos is shy. | neutral |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Percival is not rude. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Rick is consistent. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Percival is funny. | neutral |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Arthur is not angry. | entailment |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Rick is not consistent. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Amos is funny. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not consistent.
Arthur is consistent.
Percival is rude.
Amos is not rude.
Abner is shy.
Amos is not funny.
Rick is crazy.
Pierce is not consistent.
Pierce is shy.
Pierce is not funny.
Arthur is not funny.
Abner is not consistent.Rick being not rude and Abner being funny imply that Percival is not shy.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not crazy, then Rick is not consistent.
If there is at least one people who is not shy or not consistent, then Percival is rude.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Arthur is not crazy and Arthur is funny.
All not consistent people are crazy.
If there is at least one people who is both not shy and crazy, then Nathalie is not consistent.
Nathalie being not rude and Arthur being not consistent are equivalent to Percival being not shy and Amos being angry.
If all people are consistent, then Percival is not angry.
If Nathalie is consistent, then Arthur is rude, and vice versa.
If someone is not consistent and not angry, then he is not rude, and vice versa.
Someone being not crazy is equivalent to being not angry.
If there is someone who is funny, then Rick is consistent. | Abner is consistent. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Antonio is not nice. | neutral |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Hadden is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Shelley is not selfish. | neutral |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Antonio is orange. | entailment |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Thomas is nice. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Shelley is not old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Shelley is not ugly. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Hadden is fresh. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Quade is not fresh. | entailment |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Hadden is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Thomas is not nice. | entailment |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Thomas is not old-fashioned. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Mark is not old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Hadden is not orange. | entailment |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Quade is not old-fashioned. | neutral |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Mark is not selfish. | neutral |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Antonio is ugly. | contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Shelley is old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Shelley is fresh. | neutral |
Shelley is not old-fashioned.
Hadden is not selfish.
Thomas is old-fashioned.
Mark is old-fashioned.
Quade is not fresh.
Clifford is not orange.
Hadden is not orange.
Mark is nice.
Shelley is ugly.
Antonio is orange.
Thomas is not nice.
Hadden is not nice.Someone is not ugly if and only if he is orange.
If Clifford is not orange, then Shelley is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If Hadden is ugly and Hadden is nice, then Antonio is not fresh and Quade is old-fashioned.
Someone who is both not selfish and not orange is always not fresh.
Clifford being not ugly implies that Mark is fresh and Antonio is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is old-fashioned, then Hadden is selfish.
Shelley being nice and Antonio being not ugly imply that Thomas is selfish.
Thomas being not nice implies that Hadden is not old-fashioned.
If there is someone who is not nice, then Quade is not orange and Clifford is selfish.
If there is someone who is either not orange or ugly, then Quade is selfish.
Shelley is ugly if and only if Mark is not old-fashioned.
All ugly people are old-fashioned. | Quade is selfish. | entailment |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Herman is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Rosie is not better. | contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Kurt is not creepy. | contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Carlton is hilarious. | entailment |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Sterling is better. | entailment |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Lars is not creepy. | neutral |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Carlton is creepy. | neutral |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Sterling is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Rosie is not annoyed. | contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Lars is better. | contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Sterling is not creepy. | neutral |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Lars is annoyed. | contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Buck is hilarious. | entailment |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Carlton is not excited. | entailment |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Herman is creepy. | neutral |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Herman is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Rosie is hilarious. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Kurt is excited. | neutral |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Herman is hilarious. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is hilarious.
Sterling is better.
Rosie is better.
Rosie is not hilarious.
Lars is not hilarious.
Carlton is not excited.
Herman is better.
Kurt is creepy.
Buck is not excited.
Rosie is creepy.
Lars is not better.
Sterling is not excited.Someone being both not hilarious and not better is equivalent to being not annoyed.
If someone is hilarious, then he is not excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both excited and not better is equivalent to being not hilarious and not creepy.
If everyone is not excited, then Kurt is not worried and Carlton is annoyed.
If someone is better, then he is both excited and annoyed.
Someone being both not worried and not excited is equivalent to being not hilarious and better.
If there is someone who is better, then Herman is not excited and Herman is worried.
Lars being annoyed is equivalent to Kurt being worried.
If Kurt is excited, then Kurt is better, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not creepy or worried is always not hilarious.
It can be concluded that Lars is not annoyed and Carlton is worried once knowing that Kurt is hilarious.
Someone who is not worried is always not hilarious. | Rosie is annoyed. | entailment |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Neville is yellow. | contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Kelsey is yellow. | neutral |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Lombard is not practical. | neutral |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Bruce is available. | contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Amanda is not practical. | entailment |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Katrina is hungry. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Bruce is not yellow. | neutral |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Kelsey is humble. | neutral |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Neville is hungry. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Bruce is humble. | entailment |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Neville is not hungry. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Amanda is practical. | contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Katrina is not hungry. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Hunter is smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Neville is not yellow. | entailment |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Lombard is smoggy. | neutral |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Bruce is not humble. | contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Katrina is not humble. | entailment |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Neville is practical. | contradiction |
Neville is not practical.
Kelsey is not hungry.
Kelsey is not smoggy.
Neville is not humble.
Katrina is not available.
Bruce is humble.
Hunter is not smoggy.
Kelsey is practical.
Amanda is not available.
Hunter is not practical.
Hunter is yellow.
Neville is not hungry.Lombard is not hungry if and only if Hunter is yellow and Bruce is not available.
If Hunter is hungry, then Kelsey is practical.
If someone is not available and not yellow, then he is both smoggy and not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either yellow or not humble, then Bruce is hungry.
If someone is hungry, then he is not available, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor humble or yellow is always hungry.
If there is at least one people who is both available and not humble, then Bruce is not practical.
Someone being both not humble and not available is equivalent to being not yellow and smoggy.
Someone who is both not available and not practical is always smoggy.
Kelsey being not humble implies that Katrina is hungry.
Neville being not practical implies that Amanda is not available and Katrina is not yellow.
Someone is not practical if and only if he is hungry. | Amanda is hungry. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.