Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
ecb51c2f7ef1285b
" Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk | Contribs "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecb62d25419cbfda
, I had a look at this JohnHustings you was talking(obessing)about and I seen you been stalking him too, I will report you now Yours,
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecb637c3392be693
You're the one who's acting moronic by bringing back pages like Zarbon's and Dodoria's for no apparent reason! As I've already explained in my edit summary, WP:DBZ is still discussing things and characters like Paikuhan are to be merged soon. Please be patient. Don't be a dick about it by complaining. Also, make sure you sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~), as it is hard to decifer who's leaving the comment. Power level (Dragon Ball)
1
0
0
0
0
0
ecb6e18571696fd3
made by ultra-nationalist editors, as well as blind supporters,
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecbe107051e77d18
" Unlike Lenin a real person, and we have list of statues of Lenin. """"Mother Motherland"" is a Russian cliche. There is no statues to a cliche. There are diffrent statues called ""Mother Motherland"", some of them erroneously. All of them are either have wikipedia articles r expernal links with full possibilities to write wikipedia articles. This is a disambig page: a page that lists articles (or potential articlea) about different things that may be calles by the same term. `'Míkka "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecbe18edf4a006f2
" Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc05261ac13e4cd
I just started a discussion on WT:FOOTY. –
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc14070221c1b4d
Thanks for that, after reading what I did on the commons website I decided not to upload. Thanks for the information
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc26826c2f12d0d
I of course will not use modern day boundaries, as I can not claim such level of detail if I did. Instead I can use the boundaries from back then. The dispute is about where DV was located. I have maps that show it not in the Croat Banovina. At any rate, I do not even plan on including that town on the map as it was not a major one. I do not think that there will be a dispute regarding the borders of the croat banovina, if I use the map that should be deleted soon. ( ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc47f4ca78311d5
" Wiser words were never spoken. T/C "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc8d96b92ed537e
Gsd2000, I saw the comments by Rjensen and GraemeLeggett, and if it will help, I am sorry if it appeared as though I was falsly accusing you of solely advocating the position on Rockall. However, my statement was not only on Rockall, but the article in general including the map and your position that we need to copy the style of academic literature. Read it again and point out where I mention Rockall. I simply pointed out the fallacy in your argument for excluding Rockall (which from 1955 to 1972 was a possession and not anything like a county Sussex) and that your example again indicates overall how you would wish the article written. As for Rjensen's comments, maybe he should then explain the various uninhabitable rocks possessed by Australia, the United Kingdom, and in particular the United States (e.g. Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Rockall, Baker Island, Howland Island, Johnston Atoll, Navassa Island and all the other United States Minor Outlying Islands). Empire does not only deal with people and governments it also deals with territory and the status of the territory in relation to the possessing country. Guinnog, as I said before, this stuff is really not worth starting an edit war over. If Gsd2000 wants the article a certain way and others support him, then they have every write to edit the article. Of course, considering that they can hardly answer any questions or points we may bring up (or maybe they just ignore them) nor actually give definitions to what constitutes kosher imperialism, trivialities etc then we should bring this debate to some forum or bringing in an admin (although by Gsd2000's comments he (or she) seems to be or thinks he (or she) is admin). Anon 7:05 pm, April 15, 2006.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecc94b6597bc690a
Was that the jerk who also blocked me?
1
0
0
0
1
0
eccc574db78bfebd
"There are many more linguistic features that are exclusively shared with Italic (mostly Sabellic) but non existing in Keltic (not going to waste my time listing all of them) Your the ""expert"" so keep on truckin and always remember if you "
0
0
0
0
0
0
eccc5bbce0ae9ef4
Great Nomination!! Well done errant. His articles are completely pointless and most of them are empty and the events they are regarding are unfinalized. Delete!109.152.194.46
0
0
0
0
0
0
eccd410fce33d824
"It should be noted that none of the ""leaders"" mentioned here were tribal presidents, or even anyone from the upper ranks of the tribes (according to the Rapid City Journal). It would be like a group of self-important Californians (maybe even a mayor or two) declaring the state independent without any support from the state government. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
eccd8aac18361e9d
Mozart20d, I asked more experienced editors on IRC about the reliability of Beck as a source. It was universally agreed in #wikipedia-en that it is not. Anyway, if you'd like to revise the article, go ahead, but I'm basing my definition of notability on WP:BIO, and it's clear that buy those standards, he is not notable.
0
0
0
0
0
0
eccdeb7cef28e2a9
RawTherapee I'm wondering why Bytec's change in the section 'A list of Linux color-managed applications' of this article gets deleted as Spam. RawTherapee is a free RAW converter with color management running on linux and windows. If we're not able to add this fact on our own, could please someone with more 'rights' and 'credits' here can check/confirm that and change the page accordingly ? I like wiki, but it should contain complete information not just part of the truth as other part is getting deleted as SPAM.... that's a pitty. Please check on the homepage of RawTherapee Many thanks Patrik
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecce1d472b07b93c
Deletionist Diannaa is a Deletionist who spends hours a day on Wikipedia reporting hundreds of other users who don't follow her Deletionist agenda.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecce4114140f7c93
The Vacation Song I know many sources, I was updating the page in stages so many people could still see it who wanted it - I was about to do sources before deletion. Thanks and please could you put my article back up to add sources as I have no copy of it
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecce76cf97f973ec
My view is that policy exists to instruct people who don't know how to write an encyclopedia. Someone who wished to learn how to write an encyclopedia would read WP:CAT/R, learn from it, and apply that knowledge to the infobox. Your point seems to be based on the view that the common-sense idea that people identify their own religion using their own wording applies to categories but not to infoboxes. It's a point full of wikilawyering minutiae that's worthy of derision, and that's why I'm making fun of you and people like you for having it. My intent is not to stamp out opposition. It's to laugh at it and to actually hope it continues, so I can enjoy laughing at it again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd173a331ffb171
That's not a clear statement. Sorry.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd2c4531bd51ff8
PS: And it figures, you work for the City of Albuquerque. 207.69.139.137
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd34a5829dd5688
External links policy Before adding any more external links, please read the external links guideline. Wikipedia is not a repository of links, and whilst they can be used as sources, external sites should not be linked in the body of an article.  雲‍水
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd3ce01884bfcb5
ITN nomination It's very real. I chose not to react after it was posted, but for the record, I'm disappointed that it's been posted. wordsdeeds
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd468f3d852d8f5
" Street Fighter template I've put the width back to 100%, but I'd really rather keep the ndash's for now (tho I did replace them with the unicode ndash (not to be confused with a hyphen on ye olde keyboard) so they wouldn't look so ugly when viewed/edited). BTW, sorry for the lag time in responding, I missed your reply till today! ( — (talk) (e-mail) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd59dc3cf38a9d1
That's a big picture The giant picture should be sized down a bit.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd655ef5a272e81
", 26 February 2008 (UTC) Current world view of what? As you pointed out on the Spiritualism (beliefs) article, the practices occuring in other parts of the world loosely combined as ""spiritualism"" does not necessarily mean the religious movement. The article already talks about Spiritualism outside America where it is still Spiritualism-the-religious-movement. The other article describes spiritualism-around-the-world. '''''' (talk to me) 06:27"
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecd69a852ac23147
I'm sorry, but I'm not quite understanding what you would like to do. Are you looking to use Pliny as an external link or a citation?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecdb45c9628dca0e
The link in question is RELEVANT and has been on the site for one year previously, its the most popular fan site relating to Steven Tyler on the net, please stop abusing your position and let the people decide, just google steven tyler and you will see sexysteventyler.com is position 3 plus its less commercial site than imdb and the other sites you have listed. Good Luck
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecdb62538ee9c87d
In the future Please consult WP:Don't Be A Psycho before making anymore edits
0
0
0
0
0
0
ece1f93923d3326a
different to jonh locke and jean jacque rousseau what is the diffirens of john locke and jeanjacque rousseau
0
0
0
0
0
0
ece57708ccc61dc5
Astronautics Article in Further Reading Section This reference is clearly worded so as to leave the reader with the impression that Singer believed in martians. Given that this particular reference is already discussed in detail in the body of the article why do we need a POV pushing second reference here, especially in light of the level of effort it apparently requires to obtain a copy of the article in the first place. This second reference is clearly WP:UNDUE even if we accept the validity of the reference above since this whole topic is clearly WP:TRIVIA with respect to Singer in the first place. I'm not going to revert it again, but can someone please please just remove the further reading reference and let the content in the body above resolve this issue? I am minimally satisfied with the current description there, , although I would obviously still like to see Singer's direct statement on his lack of belief in martians included there.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ece7e78c68e51379
, 7 October 2005 (UTC) Thanks for the info. Note, though, that deleting references is somewhat of a no-no. Regards, 01:02
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecea1ea449200427
Sure, no prob. I'm glad you understand. Just be careful what you label as vandalism next time.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecee02343569c2f3
" Footnotes I guess (and it is only a guess) that ""Notes"" arose as a section title because, strictly speaking, they do not appear at the foot of the page. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
eceef1a85b3b4be2
" Marked as resolved... Pardon my ignorance, but what does that mean for me, exactly? Do I need to provide a defense of some sort? I'm not that used to ANI, sorry. Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecef6cf921261b2c
" Basque monoglots What is the report on the number of Basque speakers who have limited Spanish or French? And as time goes on will more or less monoglots begin to appear as a relfection of the growth and spread of the language? Ethnologue says ""speakers also use Castilian or Catalan."" Some information on this would be interesting."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecf003a25bb108c9
Fine, whatever. 76.95.66.209
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecf0ac4252558771
" Hi Hobbes Goodyear, You made good comments before, so I am glad that you responded to my request for another opinion with further good comments. ) I shortened the lede's discussion of legal complaints and application removals. I don't see how anything else can be removed without baffling the general reader. Cheers, .Wolfowitz "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecf11d84c115a1ce
" All good discussion, but old acts donot fare well with R&B; couplet as you know. Carey's ""Up Out My Face"" is a recent example. I think J.Lo is definitely doing the right thing. Eurodance is the sound of the moment, she's caching on it and adding some Rap credentials with the help of Pitbull. This is a killer combo. — (talk2me) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecf26716beb09a5d
There should be a spoiler warning. How do you expect people who is not used to wikipedia to know the entire plot is revelaed?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecf7df008f922ab6
Apoligy for newcastle upon tyme Dear Martin, I am very sorry for wasting your time and also putting those things on that page. It was just a laugh with my cousin and i apoligise deeply.No1nintendogod .
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfa58c45befb35b
":Second of all, you're not actually listening to what I'm saying: compressing your own posts is fine, but please don't remove other people's posts when you do so. That's why I'm currently reverting your changes you'll note that I put your other comment back afterward, but it was impossible to put all those other comments and keep your compression at the same time, so I reverted it. Understand? I have deleted 1 posting now: """"I must provide a phone number to a local mental hospital."""" Are you in agreement with the deletion? As you can see it doesn't address my content suggestion for the article? Being the FBI claiming there is no relationship between 911 and Osama. The mental hospital comment is nonsense IMHO. If you can give me a good reason to keep it please let me hear. I don't find this talk page an appropriate place to slander other posters. You should at least agree with that? no? Please explain if it's not a nonsense comment. Also address the FBI topic as this is the main gist of my concern, please don't whirl around it. Thank you. ( ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfaa5886e715a7e
" Wow, Wikipedia conspiracy.... I feel like Julius Caesar, except with children. I'd advise both of you to not try to get any sort of revenge: Craxy...I mean, VidGmr has already been blocked before, anyways. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfb69edbac15b2f
" Replaceable fair use Image:Hrvati1.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:Hrvati1.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfbf9d850980081
Super Nintendo I saw a Super Nintendo in a few scenes of this film. Can we add this information to the Trivia section?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfc6dbb5a9a427b
You are right. It's a phenomime and adverb, meaning, sorry that they are adjectives, misty, hazy, foggy, murky, gloomy and unclear. Usually the word is written 'もやっと' with a small tsu/っ. The line can be translated as 'It something like your heart is shrouded by fog...isn't it?' If you have dictionaries look up the word 'moyamoya/もやもや'. The meaning is almost the same. When you need Japanese help, don't hesitate to ask me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecfe82ba27ef8a42
" I think you ""sugar coated"" your last summary. I was pretty upset too when it went to AfD but figured we would win and get a laugh in the long run. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ecff218d2ba5d73c
Negative values for potato with peel Why are some of the nutritional values of a LARGER serving for potato+peel smaller than a SMALLER serving of potato without peel? Also, why are there two tables for potato with peel that seem to contradict each other? I would correct this, but the article seems to be protected.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed01298c60fd1a5c
Looks like the Wikipedia admins are retarded also. Wifione, you are a retard, simple as that.
1
0
0
0
1
0
ed013eeab700269c
" ""Occasional "" wording All of you listen, there's no need for people to get so all out of sorts over such a simple little word as ""occasional"". As I have explained before, this simply means that Wonder Woman, powerful as she is, does not routinely defeat those mentioned in physical confrontations. Yes, she has done so before, but not all the time, as some other editors want everyone to believe. She is not the most ""Powerful"" being in existence, nor is Superman, Supergirl, Captain Marvel, or the Olympian Gods. The use of the descriptor ""an occasional victory"" still remains the most appropriate wording. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0405a126fc3927
you suck messing with honduras! Fuck you 74.181.133.37 anon
1
0
1
0
1
0
ed05da3163a3eaa3
Image:American_pie_workprint_cap.jpg I have tagged Image:American_pie_workprint_cap.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed07a8c3af5f4da8
" At that time AHLM13 was not blocked and he was there with others to accuse me  Emperor  "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed081fb103db0315
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   talkdeeds
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed08b73223053b19
4chan But it is verifiable! It is on the 4chan faq page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed08d4956c28f18d
Order of the Dragon King Hi. The image you link to on the page can be uploaded under a Non Free file usage - just select Official Symbol.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0a82c2de228df7
" :I would have to argue against your first point. It implies that the universe is finite and that one could theoretically reach any point instantaneously by travelling at the speed of light. I was thinking that since you are travelling at the speed of light and as are your headlights, the distance that they seem to travel in front of your vehicle would remain constant. Also, at that incredibly high speed, you would most likely be ""over-driving your headlights."" So because of that I think that if one were travelling at light speed, headlights wouldn't be much use. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0a9e53942148f9
" It is your opinion that it is nonsense. I consider it a personal attack that you consider my edit ""nonsense""; hence, by policy, you are also guilty of vandalism on this page. This argument is circular. As for the Medea page, challenge each point directly and logically, but don't use such blanket terms such as ""nonsense"" and ""vandalism"" without backing it up."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0ae23483fee4fa
February 2011 (UTC) You are welcome to comment should you desire to do so, although the conversation (word used advisedly) seems to be entirely focussed on some deficiency of process which seems to largely consist of not having personally sent User:ANUser a summary of the salacious details (. If we had held a full blown arbitration, I'm sure we would have had just as many criticisms for persecuting the guy instead of quietly sorting it out behind the scenes. 00:16, 28
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0b00459b116c89
" Maybe before you start making changes of your own you shoiuld check you facts. ""So Excited"" is clearly at #2, not 16. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0bc9c37e6bffe8
And it goes without saying that comments like that need direct citations, especially if put in the Plot section.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0c809c5e4a04df
REDIRECT Talk:Tom Ryan (Toomevara hurler)
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0d1cb3a021afdc
REDIRECT Talk:Russo-Georgian War/Archive 34
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0e817eab5b4dcf
Thanks, glad to hear it!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0ee9b8e45b82f8
Nobody would be able to do this without original research. Also it would be impossible due to the amount of effects he uses on his voice. In particular, the pitch shifter he uses to harmonize. Sometimes he does 5th(like in Schism), sometimes an octave, we can never tell what's real and what's not. I can say he has a high upper range though.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0ef89d2e57c5d8
Atkinson Vehicles Ltd Please don't be offended that I have migrated the work you put in to a new location in Seddon Atkinson. It really needs to be there as a part of the history of the company instead of in an article on its own. the redirect, which I have reinstated, solves any problems for people looking for AVL, and search engines will find the article anyway, and perhaps better because it's a single, larger article. I think it still needs work, and, since you seem to be knowledgeable in that area, hope you will pick up the challenge of making it an excellent article. I'm not a subject matter expert, I just made some copyediting decisions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0f3df4c1836e44
" Policy You're right, i didn't follow the policy as i should of. You didn't ""annoy"" me exactly, it just ""annoys"" me how people want to throw their weight around about content they're not familiar with. Youtube would be reliable in this case because there's like 3 or 4 intros to ""The Main Event"" that has SNME's generic intro music, and they're not all from the same user. So you can say ""Oh, well they could of edited the music for a reason i can't think up right now"", but all different users doing the same thing? Regardless, if i cared enough, i could search enough to find a reliable source. But a few extra words doesn't mean anything to me right now. One day in the future i may do that, but not now. I'm interested in the copyright infringement with Youtube and WWE you mentioned though, so if you would, tell me a little more about it."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed0f6ac411f48c28
sorry i stepped away for a second and my friends decided it would be funny to delete a page. Those damn idiots. Sorry about that.
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed10272b3cd3634f
Hey asshole I don't appreciate your fucking condescension. Yeah, that's right, I wikilinked it so you can look up those big words that so elude you. You better Shut The Fuck Up and shove your Wikipedian Assholifity (yeah i made up that word what are gonna do sue me, huh bitch?) right up your sore-from-taking-it-up-the-ass asshole. I saw an attempt to give a nice little wikilink to a fun English usage, and you just fuck everything up. I'm gonna be bold, not like fucking pussies such as yourself.
1
0
1
0
1
0
ed11a3305f63ee9f
have u heard of Glasses Malone???
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed11d47807792050
Augh, maybe I shouldn't have posted that then! You're not going to start bringing that up again are you?? -))
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed11fb9da0f37032
Twinkle Help Hi, i noticed you commented on my convo about my problems i am having with TW, i was wondering how you would change/fix a persistent proxy? I think that that has to be the problem as my monobook is correct, and i am using Firefox (which TW is compatible with), and i am still unable to use TW.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1286604f8d9075
":St Kilda in the new year, then?  (said · done) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1375ddf447f09b
i know i do and you like it
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed138622749baeaa
Thanks Stop deleting the links to the Celebrity Whovian category, they are relevant as those celebrities fall under the category.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed146a1644ffa90e
is 3,932,100 and could
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed149403db917771
" Irish flag The references to ""amber"" in the Irish flag (in connection with the colours sported by various Gaelic games sides) would seem to be out of place, given that the flag of Ireland is constitutionally defined as being green, white, and orange. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1544b9aacdb461
Then would is a reliable sourece? Please explain it in YOU OWN WORDS. I have look at Wikipedia's, now I would like to know yours.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed155f58a8fbea77
My name is not Jason. You are one paranoid person. Wiki4Christ is much bigger than him.
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed15c6d5456a3acf
billoreilly.com] | footnotes = }}
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1647baddfa855c
Boring picture? Geez, you'd think people would expect something more than a mouse on a tree in a FLYING squirrel article. Come on, put up a picture of one that's actually FLYING.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed16b05d6e411a82
Accusing people making edits in good faith as being vandals is a good sign you're letting POV infect your editorial discretion.12.195.103.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed17b5f2dbe925ad
Thank you very much! (Holla)
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed17ba562b2ae04a
Thank you You're all very kind. Keep it up!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed183651b8d73969
(UTC) Reason for discussion topic heading update. This interview of Elon Musk on 9/24/2007 by nasaspaceflight.com indicates that BFTS now stands for Big Falcon Test Stand. http://nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5237 Thus this topic heading has been updated to reflect SpaceX’s own definition for this acronym. No content has been removed from this discussion topic. 20:01, 26 September 2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed19bb4c0d9ba84a
The fact of the matter is that flamarande certainly is not using the term british isles in this way and i will continue to keep Ireland separate from britian on this page as germany is separate from france.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1ac87429820821
What is your problem? I did open s discussion on the talk page about how a BOOK is not a fictional library or librarian. The only other participant devolved into a rant about being locked up in a mental institution. If you can demonstrate that a real BOOK is a fictional anything, great. Do so. Except of course a real BOOK is not a fictional anything and adding categories for fictional items to articles about real things is nonsensical. So what exactly needs to happen for this article on a real BOOK to not be categorized in fictional categories anymore?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1ae922f34f686f
"::::I didn't need any proof that they didn't know; all I needed was to state, as I did, that there was no evidence that they knew of itbecause since you hadn't yet shared with the rest of us the evidence that you had, we had none. I made no false statements, there; all I did was to factually affirm the academic consensus, and the fact that none of the militiamen ever cited the order as an excuse for what they did. I and several other editors repeatedly asked you to provide evidence to show otherwise; only this morning did you do so. I have nothing personal against you for the position you've taken; all I am saying is that in the absence of evidence of the kind you provided only just today, I had no choice but to write what I did. As I said earlier, the ""probability"" you cited in your earlier edit summary is not proof. Today, you finally provided us with some hard evidence to work withfor which I thank you, in all sincerity, once again. If you had given us this when we first asked for it, a lot of this could have been avoided. Again, no hard feelings on my end; I understand the emotional issues involved here, especially when this concerns family. I just wish you could have told us all this a few days ago. That's all. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1c6d93f4a8c6b2
Dobermann Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) WP:ENGVAR.Articles should use the same dialect throughout. Each article should have uniform spelling and not a haphazard mix of different spellings. Since the article is referenced by AKC and the The Doberman Pinscher Club of America it is NOT vandalizing!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed1c972f9833f41b
" It's merely letting anyone who might question my ""bias"" on a discussion based soley on my old user page comments that the issue has already been discussed, just as AfD discussions are archived in case anyone wants to start a new page for a subject that has already been deleted. That's not an attack. Nor is it ""personal"" because it is not directed at anyone. really, it seems now like your just scratching bare earth trying to find something, anything to ding me for. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed20df87bbde3a29
" Withdrawn charges The London Free press also reported that his charges were withdrawn silently. Now from the perspective of a normal criminal process, this usually means the police had a weak case. The fact that the police were gung-ho about this case may also suggest that the police had no case at all (judging by the seemingly high-profile aspect to this case). In other words, Homeontherange's addition of that information is a pretty clear sign that the information is being added in order to disparage James Scott Richardson. What is my point of reference? Well. When I added information to Alex Kulbashian and Richard Warman about a Canadian Human Rights Commission complaint file by Alex against Richard, Homeontherange removed the information stating that the complaint could have been filed, however it wasn't serious enough to because there was no evidence the Commissioner signed off on it. Now, getting back to this case, the crown attorney and/or withdrew the charges because there was no prospect for conviction. To Homeontherange: If you are going to have double standards in ""enforcing"" wikipedia's criteria for information posted in articles, then that shows your political motivation behind your edits and the way you handle your ""administrative"" tasks. That would be classified as Administrator Abuse Wikipedia:Administrators#Administrator_abuse. Furthermore, the fact that the IP address 72.136.34.96 spontaneously lost the ability to make edits without logging in with no explanation could also show a certain level of abuse of administrative rights (by the way. Will be reporting that to Jimbo Wales). So feel free to revert the edit I've made, but make an attempt to justify your actions this time."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed22fc4f1ac43f41
Looks more like you're exaggerating your distress in an attempt to persuade an admin to punish me. This wouldn't be the first time.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed23c82c0e546d0d
He refused to put a separate heading for individualist anarchism.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed23d347f91a9fcd
He is a Tajik and thus an ethnic Persian, Tajik=Persian, idiot Pashtun Turk.84.59.202.75
1
0
0
0
1
1
ed2882ea1cd35bdc
I believe so; it's one of a string of examples of similar function, which include the Spanish preterite, as it happens. But Romanian is not one of my languages, and this is chiefly a reminder that we may need a sentence on it. PMAnderson
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed2882fd857a9668
" Comment AGAINST DAB - Clannad (band) should remain the main article as ""popularity by numbers"" don't mean anything. The band is clearly much more of a mainstay in worldwide culture than this passing fad of a game/novel. As mentioned here, the writer only named the series because of a misunderstanding of what the ""word"" meant (even though it's from many words, as the band has explained). If I created a novel called ""Microsoft"" about tiny fluffy bunnies, and it quickly became popular in China, does that mean it should bump the corporate wiki page? CERTAINLY NOT. ₪— (T·C) "" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed29e044ab541c44
" It differs from case to case, the best is to inform the editor and then update yourself but sometimes I am to lazy.  (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed2b57132c2ac327
" Ongoing IAU discussion? Is the reason that there was no improved IAU definition of planets that they wanted to pass such a decision with a large majority, but couldn't come to an agreement yet? I hope it's not that they think the current definitions are OK, because they're clearly not. For example the definition of extrasolar planet states the lower mass limit for an object to be an extrasolar planet is the same as in the Solar System... but there was no such limit given. Neither for dwarf planets nor for regular planets. There would have been no harm done if the upper limit for extrasolar planets was also applied to the Solar System, but that wasn't done either. It's like they're hiding everything behind smoke and mirrors and make up the results as they go. It would be relatively easy to come up with criteria that could decide if a newly discovered body is a planet or not. But they didn't do it. Why? What for example is wrong with the following? 1. A planetary mass object is an object with a mass between the agreed mass limit needed for hydrostatic equilibrium (5×1020kg) and the agreed mass limit needed for deuterium fusion (2.5×1028kg). (Both limits might be set lower since the first would exclude Pallas and Vesta which are remaining protoplanets and the second doesn't take into account that objects with high metallicity could allow deuterium fusion at a lower mass) 2. A planet is a planetary mass object on an orbit around at least one star that also has the capability of clearing its orbit (per Stern-Levison criteria. The difference is you only need to know mass and orbital period of the object (and the star of course), whereas with Soter's criteria you'd need to know everything about the system). 3. A dwarf planet (I prefer mesoplanet) is a planetary mass object on an orbit around at least one star that doesn't fulfill the Stern-Levison criteria. More definitions could be added to account for other types of planetary mass objects. I prefer ""planetar"" for those that don't orbit any star - regardless if they were formed by themselves or in a system of which they were later ejected. Also, I'd like ""moon"" to mean a planetary mass object that orbits a planet (since the prototype object Luna is just that) - smaller bodies would just keep being ""satellites"". (If you don't like to have 60 planets of which most are small, why would you allow 60 moons of which most are tiny?) Any ideas why the IAU doesn't come up with something like that? First of all, there is a lower mass limit: hydrostatic equilibrium. Second, this has nothing to do with improving the article. Simply talking about the merits or lack thereof of the IAU's decision is outside the scope of Wikipedia. podous Your second point is right. My opinions are not relevant, as I'm not an astronomer, and my conclusions from the available data would be OR, so neither belongs in the article. But you don't seem to realize that your first point is extremely open to definition. It could mean the shape of the object. Then the next question is where the limit between spheroidal and irregular is. It could mean an object with this mass and composition would certainly reach hydrostatic equilibrium. Or it could mean an object with this mass would certainly reach hydrostatic equilibrium. I'm heavily in favour of the third, as it is the one that could be most easily checked (especially for exoplanets), and avoids the problem that an ice world could qualify, while a larger and denser asteroid would be rejected, since rocky worlds are much harder to pull into equilibrium. But from statements in the article, I'm guessing at least those astronomers favor the second one. (And if they're not representative, why would they be in the article?)Basically, I want to say that the IAU should make a decision that makes it clear the astronomers know what they are doing and want to share their knowledge with the public. Because if the public decides to not follow astronomers' findings anymore, the result will likely be even less funding... and that would be a real problem. There are many ambiguities with the current definition, all of which are mentioned in the article already. podous 13:29, 19 Januar
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed2f95bd8c99591f
Further questions: What function does their elongated body serve? Stability/aerodynamics?
0
0
0
0
0
0