Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
ed3200fea27d6cba
While the conclusion is logical, the show has not revealed Maryann's true nature and it may be unwise to predefine her identity. I suggest waiting until we know what she is before we draw conclusions. It is not a place to speculate.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed329ceaa5a65101
re: help me I think that when UberCryxic deleted your paragraph, it was mainly due to the prose. Also, I think that he doesn't want the eras to get too large and would rather that information be integrated. This is a valid point, however I would say that since the top section is about his recording career that information such as hits is indeed needed. I would go about trying to establish a consensus to list the hits in an album, as I do believe that it is relevant. Also, use correct citations etc. If you improved the prose, and justified your reasoning on the talk page, such as that it makes the information more accessible (one of the key reasons why personal life stuff was separated, to make it more accessible), and also that hits information has the UTMOST bearing on Michael's recording career. If you justify yourself, clean up the prose a bit, and provide clear citations, I don't see the problem. Wait for people to respond on the talk page, and work from there.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed373d5f345c4a0c
Elnaz Rezaei Be polite dear B Watson. You have to be patient infront of the people that they Have been a misunderstanding.I forgive your aggretion.Good Luck
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed375dd2ad9baad5
Neutrality 90% of the article lays blame with rangers fans and can be seen as nothing other than an attack upon rangers fans 10% of this article offers the counter point that the evil, sick and twisted policed were to blame for the incident the entire neutrality of this article is in question facts 1 - the police state, they ordered the jumbo screen switched off 2 - this was the flashpoint for the riot 3 - the police then send thousands of officers towards the rangers fans with batons drawn and attack them 4 - you are beyond evil for supporting these abhorrent actions.... TAG STAYS till bias removed and neutrailty of the article is in good standing 94.168.211.137
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed38a60ed64d1638
" My review Thanks for the positive review! I'm trying to work on writing more articles - I've got one in my sandbox, and I've just done a massive cleanup effort on Hurricane Gustav (2002), so hopefully I can add those to my resume of GAs or FAs in the future. As for the VandalProof thing, it's sometimes difficult to tell which edits are good faith and which ones aren't. I'm working on that, though. '''''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed39cce32e194bc7
missing movie The god-awful 2012 movie starring Vincent Fegan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed3ad28fba306d96
I can understand your reasons for taking a break. As I have been indicating, the atmosphere is severe. It can have a severe effect on folks unused to such atmosphere. I had noticed that you were saying something about infoboxes at the ANI. As far as I know, there is no set vetting process required for putting up any infoboxes. So, anyone can put up any infobox they want. I don't see much of a value in such infoboxes. I like to form my own opinion based on the particular user's edits and comments only. Looking at the edits and comments of some of the folks who do have infoboxes...... Actually, to my way of thinking, there is no need for such infoboxes. Things become easily obvious from edits and comments alone. I do not say anything about your edits and comments because I think I am unqualified to make an assessment for your contributions. I think I have known some fine scholars on WP and have participated in some exhilarating discussions with them. But invariable, I find their userpages without any infoboxes saying it. Why does one need state the obvious? Actually, I think there are some disadvantages to putting up such infoboxes. If you are seriously considering putting up one, I think you may want to know my detailed view on it in beforehand. Looking at some of your comments, I have the most unmistakable impression that you have an excellent grasp of such issues. I have known very few users about whom I could say the same. (I am speaking only about the ones which I have seen). As such, I was looking forward to other people's sense of sourcing issues would also improve (by having discussions with you). I have also been looking for a particular quote from one particular source and I had the impression that you might probably be in a position to help me in that regard. It is about some other, unrelated article. But since you are busy now, I don't think it would be proper for me to bother you with some silly request of mine. I have noticed that the catalyst with sidekicks is happy because they have been able to drive you away. Actually, it seems to me that they have driven away hundreds of users and also caused blocks on scores of others, are experts at harassing others with warnings, long winded arguments, irrelevant comments, severe ad hominem attacks, etc. etc. etc. also know how to obtain blocks for their opponents at ANIs..... Anyway. Regards.-
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed3b6418a042ba9e
Userboxes Good day Mr Jacobite. I was wondering how I go about adding those little boxes to my user page i.e 'this user is interested in the English Civil War' etc. I have experimented a bit with it but the boxes end up bunched up at the top of the page. Thanks in advance,
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed3c5f957494d909
" How they do it. Revealing how vandals prevent accurate information on Poppers, that they disagree with, from being posted here! I just figured out what's going on what these guys are doing to those of us who want to edit the poppers page by adding more accurate and meaningful information, but which they do not agree with. If you can find the time, I urge you to go into the ""history"" of the poppers section or page (click on the ""history"" tab at the top of the page), and then go to the bottom of that page. There you can click on the largest number, and essentially see ALL the history of this page from the day it was created! I just spent time looking at it, and a clear pattern emerges. To be kind, there are some pranksters among us. More realistically, and at worse, they are vandals. Some of them appear to be working in concert with each other to make arbritary changes to the edits of people they don't agree with. They literally and very quickly 'revert' the versions back and forth among their own versions, all the while essentially vandalizing the credible information that more knowledgeable people have posted. Then, when the unsuspecting editors realize something's going on, that their edits are being deleted almost within minutes of their having posted them, and when they try to figure out how best to react and deal with the problem, as they begin the inevitable complaining and asking of questions, they are harrassed and threaten with having their accounts 'blocked'; or they're falsely accused of violating various rules of Wikipedia, upon which they are often then threatened with even more sanctions against them. It is precisely this kind of unethical, irresponsible and despicable behavior that was exposed in the world wide media earlier this week. Had I not seen the news reports which described exactly this kind of activity being rampant on Wikipedia, I would most likely have never figured out what was going on. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed3de98a711205c9
Do you know if that was incorrect introduction. How about you find me proof that it was fake?!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed41bd30ae90fd56
REDIRECT Talk:HMS Dorking (1918)
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed42a44c0faca175
You obviously do not even understand wiki's policy on sourcing with wiki links, while taking liberty in undoing material you don't understand even after sourced with links to other pages. Again, please leave the undoing part to someone who has a firm grasp on the subject. You are not being helpful.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed42f32a62d2baa1
Wiki Edit I only corrected it!! What's the problem?!! What is a sandbox??? Look at yourself before you start to nag...
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed4448b7fef068f5
There are so many articles that wish to down play the parts of the JW religion that they really don't understand. I will not go back in and change the article. If people want to discredit something they don't understand that is ok. this being said is in no way directed to anyone in particular. I just find it interesting that people want to write up document reports on religions that they are no part of. There are pages on Cathlics, Baptist, and other religions that state opinions of people who are not even a part of those religions. To me and this is personal it is very sad when there are people who will 'critically analzye something that they do not believe in themselves. oh well.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed449c4b8163cb48
" 1. I will not even move my finger to source anything of that BS, I didn't put it there. You put it there without any sources at first, them addede electronic unrelated sources, then changed to printed ones, and all the while, when sources kept changing the text stayed the same to the word! You invented this ""fact"" and how it relates to the whopping 4.4%, so the only thing I am asking, show the relation of massacre to the 4.4% with verbatum citatons from the source. You asked my above about Subtelny's quote, I did it, now it is your turn to support your outlandish claims with facts. I am curious as to how the massacre relates to the whopping 4.4%? 2. Then second question arises, why particularly this region with this tiny Russian minority is mentioned while others, for example Zhytomyr oblast with almost double the number of Russians in Volhynia is overlooked? That again highlights the real reason, why this BS is here - a revenge for mentioning ethnic cleansing of Crimean Tatars. (WP:POINT). If you and Russianname are concearned with the plight of etnic Russians in Western Ukraine, why almost the same number of Russians in Transcarpathia, and even the higher number of Russians in Lviv Oblast have been overlooked? Is that because these numbers could not be used in childish revenge, while Volyn ones, even if they are way lower, can? (WP:POINT) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed45a7268dfd9dfa
" I'm not sure I agree with that bit of crystal ball gazing. Better language than ""more recently"" should be found though. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed479b7ec50fc566
Thank You Thank you for the semi-protection approval of Timeline of United States inventions... I've worked on that page for almost 2 years in its research and it has been getting hammered lately. Thank you again!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed4a43c851c4a46e
" Murder? A line in the article states, ""The accident occurred around 7:25 am, when the balloon was attempting to land in a field next to Somerset Road, due to a murder attempt by the pilot"" Where in any of the sources does it indicate a murder attempt?!?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed4b78fe8db94a69
Oh not you again!!! And so? After the block has expired, Im gonna kick Gwerns ass again you admin wannabe!!! Im gonna rape you all!!!
1
0
1
1
1
0
ed4c0c7c94f937db
Thank you for repling. I was not trying to evade my block. Evading my block would be to use different acounts to do the same action I was blocked for. I only used different accounts so I could communicate with you as you were not responding to me here. What I posted was an alternate version I hoped people would agree on. I was not in violation of WP:CIVIL, I was attempting to make a compromise that everyone could agree was acceptable. However, you blocked me without any discussion or warning. War
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed4d7b8b3facd04f
) It belongs in the introduction per the manual of style, as sufficiently well-known terms that cover the entire topic the article is dealing with. 12:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed4e7a27ffdeb962
RE: MMC You know what I'm beginning to see why people are no longer using this site for references of ANY kind. You revert the edit because I called somebody an ass? So what does this have to do with the article in itself? The cast members are already listed to the best of knowledge and there's no Chris Butler, Issac, etc because that messes up the total cast itself.Rocky
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed502107163cb9e4
Pat Smear Please read WP:LEDE#Length. For an article of this length, the lede should be 1-2 paragraphs long, not three sentences. It is a fallacy that the lede of an article is meant to do the bare minimum to introduce the subject; it should serve as an acceptable overview of the entire article. Right now roughly 75% of the article has no representation at all in the lede. I'll be re-tagging on my next pass if the lede remains inadequate. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed509388bbfe30af
" Who's denying anything. I'm the one that put the detention order into Wikipedia, twice and I moved it right up to the lede in one article. In fact, by the time I was done with the lede, it looked like a pro-coup explanation for the coup. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed51800f46146ba6
Colchicum, don't be so touchy. I'm the normal guy, like you or Russavia. All are involved in the mutual task improving the Wikipedia. The differences in our views do not deny the idea that overall we are doing the Wikipedia better. Otherwise, who would ever need us here?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed522295e290014c
And btw i already know that you and your crew of intimate experts have NO clue concerning Archaeology you do not have to repeat it over and over; But it is Archaeologically impossible for a people (Insubres where the majority of inscriptions were found) of the Golasecca culture (12th century BC Urnfield group) to have been anything other than Italic;
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed522ef29369a50d
" I'm strongly opposed to any furtherance of the pretence that collaborative editing requires going around getting blessings for one's actions off of people. There's nothing special about your having left a ""per above"" comment on that TfD which makes your being notified of prime importance to future work on it. Indeed, that it resulted in my being first called ""disingenuous"" and then casually asked to reconsider my dedication to the encyclopedia only confirms to me that asking the peanut gallery is not a productive use of my time. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed52e1bcd95b791f
WoW Popularity Hi Arabani, I guess I missed that discussion. Thanks for keeping an eye out.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed549b322620d6ca
pdf files are common and I definitely recommend downloading the free Adobe Reader. Defining 0^0 = 1 is more common. The pdf does that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed56cdc2cd22db91
This is your personal opinion that does not belong in an article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed56f082116dcbd0
Grandma Terri Should Burn in Trash Grandma Terri is trash. I hate Grandma Terri. F%%K her to HELL! 71.74.76.40
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed58abb40640f983
PN News You mean the people here actually care about the talk page of a low importance-rated article? I'm surprised at this news. I left that comment in the in the edit because the person who consistantly reverts it back has no justifiable reason to do so. The information I provided for PN News' moveset is stated clearly and is from reliable sources, yet the fucktard keeps reverting it.
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed590e5b393983e5
Update discussion with
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed59939c18f47fdd
I do not believe that the claim that district, city, state is a standard naming convention is accurate. At best, I believe it is an undocumented and informal convention imposed on Wiki by a handful of contributors without any discussion. If I'm wrong, please correct me and point to the documentation of this convention (prior to the Hollywood rename) and discussion of convention prior to that. Just because Hollywood is not a city does not mean it should not be listed as Hollywood (my preference) or Hollywood, California. The name of every Wiki article should reflect common usage as much as possible, period. Yes, the convention for city names is city, state, but that's because that is common usage for cities! But where does it say that place, state necessarily implies that place is an incorporated city, so that place, state can only be used for actual cities? What about all the unincorporated areas of every state?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed59df8fba9be009
Fuck off you idiot 82.103.128.115
1
0
1
0
1
0
ed5aa1f2bb8bdd41
A welcome from Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia! 21:25, January 20, 2006 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed5bff558e2e0cfa
ahhh... bots.... thank you and I apologize!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed5f62f9ff70fdcb
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JIP Here he is, your decision to block me for one week or even more is fully justified as i abused a particular religion,nation and a user but my acts of putting those articles on the list of deletion were correct and justified, i have never removed a single para which has been cited alongside citations and further as i know India's History closely i can surely claim all those articles as myth and simply hoax. And the agreement of another Editor and Admin who too is from Europe but unlike you he based him opinion after going through the articles which are without A single source for many years, when even after searching so much on net we cant find a single source then the article qualifies for deletion but admin like you insist on such articles.You havent told me a single reason that why those articles should be maintained on wikipedia(apart from your personal rivalry against me).
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed60a33ca553f649
"Biblical allusions== I was thinking of putting this into the liteary allusions sections, but I'd like some comments and a quote check first. ""The film makes a number of seemingly biblical references, intrestingly it is mostly the Sith who make them. These possible references include: ""It is done"" ""I do not know you anymore"" ""If you are not with us, you are against us"" ( Though the last one might be more of a political reference to George Bushes use of the same quote)."" == "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed64d530a34aa973
Happy New Years Cheers )
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6508adc0a6cb1a
Originally added to the article, moved here in an edit Please join further discussion on arachnoidcyst.org or arachnoidcyst.net to get a blow by blow update from those that suffer long term and to understand our prognosis better. Granted we are all individuals but like cancer, there are many similarties in the manner in which patients suffer and until there is an established protocol we only have each other to depend on.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6673bdc03943ff
To {{u|The Banner{{, you are treading very closely (and probably in fact violated) WP:OUTING. Deal with sourcing, or pov, or whatever other policies, but attempting to out the coi will only lead to a ban for yourself.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed66f1f0cf5a1ca6
"I'm pretty sure this should be ""Ron Lawruk"" instead of ""Ronald Lawruk"". His name in his books is just ""Ron""."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed67cb57e7af24e8
" AIV report For something like this, I'd suggest reading through Wikipedia:Sockpuppets and then possibly make a report Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. † "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6850821b939a73
User Phanatical is a scum bag dogshit liar. chinky commie agent, rot in hell.
1
0
1
0
1
0
ed68c749918f3c47
You do understand that not everyone who isn't a Muslim is a Christian?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6b590850216a16
", 3 March 2014 (UTC) Oohhhhh, I see. PSE-36 refers specfically to the trick of burying four more bits of RAM address in the PDE, using some of the bits that would ordinarily ""MBZ"" under plain PSE. Got it. 03:28"
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6cd06e44868c15
What about the novelist? There is no article about Fritz Peters, the american novelist and Gurdjieff memorist. The desambiguation page is also not working.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6d42aadf52d017
B'nay Mitzvah I'm not sure if I'm spelling it right, but when a boy and a girl both have their mitzvahs in the same ceremony, isn't it called a b'nay mitzvah?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6ed2a94a4e7e71
" Sorry about that, take it off if you want. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6ed9f444a1a0ce
Bad blocks I see this is being discussed here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid;=222518717#Bad_Blocks But under what strange assumption have I been 'harassing' another user? I accused FT2 of 'in effect' enabling pro-paedophile editors by blocking me and about the only other person prepared to put an end to nonsense claims like 'Jules Verne was a paedophile'. Yes, true. Another set of organisations I am contacting is the many Jules Verne societies. Oops but is that a 'legal threat'? Let's see.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed6f6c993d9ff0b8
. looks like you already have been warned by others, keep pushing it and you will be blocked
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed71b5e1be26e9f3
" ""Originally conceived as a bonus disc to accompany a reissue of The Fame, her four million-selling debut album, Monster is now being released as a record in its own right. ""In the midst of my creative journey composing The Fame Monster, there came an exciting revelation that this was in fact my sophomore album,"" the Lady herself explains. ""It's a complete conceptual and musical body of work that can stand on its own two feet."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7429d3d6fe729a
Ca'Foscari University - History of English Culture Project Hi everyone! I'm a postgraduate student from Ca' Foscari University, Venice. As an assignement for my History of English Culture course I have chosen to expand this article. As a provisional bibliography I have selected these sources: Tim Hitchcock and Robert Shoemaker, Tales from the Hanging Court, London, Hodder Arnold, 2007 www.oldbaileyonline.org If you have any suggestions or advice, I would really appreciate it. Feel free to talk to me here or on my talk page!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7477a6f22d9d3d
I agree. Hardly anything worth keeping on the page of this band.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed75734705c3093b
Oh look, it is shitface. Hey shitface. I just want to let you know, you still haven't apologized to me for vandalizing my page so i demand a damn apology RIGHT NOW! DO YOU HEAR?! I DEMAND A DAMN APOLOGY NOW SHITFACE! NOW!!!
1
0
1
0
1
0
ed75cf669ccee9b1
" ""Fixed OR problem""? I restored one of the deleted paragraphs. I think the edit, while helpful, went a little too far."
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed771839c7d4648f
REDIRECT Talk:Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed783b618ba45778
" I disagree, I beleive chemistry to be fundamental to the definition of the electron. Are you saying physics is more important than chemistry? What is your bias? What is you source when you say that chemistry is subset of physics? How do chemistry only use the electron, any more that physicist? And crystal fields is not an alternative model, but a fundamental one. It was in my freshmen chemistry textbook. I think the article in wikipedia, is an ""alternative model."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7af8c048e7513c
Chester Marcol is threatening me chester marcol is threatening me and that is bullying.-_-=(get lost chester marcol you dont scare me-_-
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed7c26d26c6493ed
Created and copyright (2003) by Eugene Villar (seav).) And released under terms of the GNU FDL, right? ;)
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7cb933d2b4eb12
User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User region free
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7d221d88053092
Renewed edit warring at Circumcision You were warned in February about this, yet you're doing it again. Follow BRD and start a discussion. If you can get a consensus for your edit, then, and only then, can you add it. Maybe you can reach a compromise? Give it a try.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed7e187ad79a2e74
X Light Flotilla battalion (RSI) I'm sure they had a role but it's crazy to put them in the OOB at the same level as Army Group C! The Italian source quoted implies they came under 715th Division's command but they would certainly have been taking orders from them or the German Corps HQ. talk - contribs
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed805003e47d7222
" January 2008 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Falmouth, Maine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed82f77e8000952a
":::You grossly misrepresented the Duncan source. The next word after the part you quote is ""However...."" and the conclusion of the article is that arguments from silence (AFS) have value. The article states that the claims of fallacy assume the AFS is intended as a proof, but no historical argumnet is intended as a proof. This is the third time I've caught you misrepresenting sources and/or adding sources you haven't actually read. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed8375db84013990
" I have no idea why you continue to want to discuss singles as a concept to me. I don't care. All I want is a source to settle the dispute. If there's a source that defines those LP songs as a single, great, problem solved, present it to the articles talk page. If not, you just wasted a lot of your time. msg me "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed8654adf378702f
" Thanks for that tip. Yes, I will learn how to use it, since everything I do uses math - I mean when I am not fighting off rabid currs nipping at my cuffs. Can one put pictures and sound in as well? Yes, back to Uncle Ed. There are matters of general policy here: 1. Defamatory words like ""crank"", ""kook"", ""crackpot"" should be banned by Wikipedia as they are literally used in the commission of hate crimes against dissident minorities. They EMOTIONALLY mean the same as ""Kike"", ""Nigger"", ""FAGGOT"" et-al. I and others like Nobel Prize winner Brian Josephson are persecuted for daring to write about the paranormal, about consciousness, about UFOS, about cold fusion (Brian's interest). We are automatically stereotyped as ""kooks"" by clueless fearful generally intellectual inferiors who mistake their inability to understand what is on the page as our fault. Rather than they rising to us, we are to stoop to their low level of achievement and keep away from Taboo Topics. Is that a Free Society? How is that better than 7th Century Talabanism? We dissident physicists and there are many in the closet are treated as second-class citizens without the same rights that the majority like CH pretends to stand for keep for themselves in a double standard. One can say ""Jack Sarfatti's ideas are highly original and advanced and not easily understood by the majority of people who reject them."" Something like that is accurate. If one says something negative then they must justify it with a precise quote with a name otherwise it is simply vicious defamation. It is simply a hate crime on the WEB. We live in a SYMBOLIC INFO NATION in CYBERSPACE. Words are everything. WORDS are WEAPONS! Soon Internet Law will evolve and the kinds of defamations of my character seen on these pages by dillettantes will be judged as HATE CRIMES like beating up a Gay Man or lynching a Black Man used to be. How can anyone reading my words, looking at my math, so insult me as to call me a such words as ""crank"". Why not say what you really mean deep down which is ""Jack Sarfatti is a Jew""? Do I sound like Shylock in The Merchant of Venice? 2. Flaky internet sources like Alt.Kooks, Crank.Dot.Net should not be cited to debase and humiliate anyone deemed worthy enough to have a page in Wiki. They are cultural PORNOGRAPHY of no redeeming social value. 3. Critiques should be COMPETENT, as DSiegel's is not when he cites Martin Gardner. A solid TEXTUAL justification is required like one must do as a grad student learning to do PhD research. The basic issue here is QUALITY CONTROL, ACCURACY, FAIRNESS, JUSTICE. 07:50 PM, 12 October 2005 (PCT)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed87b296829582dd
This article needs more credible information and there just isn't much to compare. There is a reason many historians have not published academic articles on this subject. This article probably needs to be deleted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed891e21d111b412
Vandalism? I keep getting messages saying im vandalising pages that ive never been on. One was from you. Why does this happen?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed89229fc8219978
Reaction Shouldn't there be a section saying whether people liked it or hated it? Something like professional reviews?
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed89a21e309086e1
the guy whose original block you affirmed unfit to be admins. Please let me know to whom at the Wikimedia foundation I can send
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed8bb6555314c155
This is a wikipedia talk page and WP:NOTAFORUM.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed8ccdfaa31397ae
No, you're incorrect. Kww and I is the correct way. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed909a37d18d3c42
It was anonymous on accident, and FYI, I'm not a troll moron. 23:54, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
1
0
0
0
0
0
ed91558ae16c0661
I AM REALLY UPSET!!! WP:CSD: It is irrelevant whether the claim of notability within the article is not sufficient for the notability guidelines. If the claim is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied. Often what seems non-notable to a new page patroller is shown to be notable in a deletion discussion. GO AND UNDELETE Juan Canaro NOW!
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed936f63749da37e
OK, I have made the edits. I am just tired of professional Wikipedia busybodies like Dimadick, who don't have any specialist knowledge on topics like this, making a mess of articles and then manipulating Wikipedia's ridiculous bureaucracy to stifle any dissent. Did he take his edits to the Talk Page for debate, as I initially suggested to him? No, he just engaged in an edit war and waited for an admin to lock it down. It's a farce.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed96345d3cc10a23
" Thank you for experimenting with the page Stephen F. Austin on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed965d19e2326b57
" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats [[Wikipedia:C
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed98b546dd3a26f8
Mokele you are just a waste of my time the only way to get the answer to something is to go out and find it yourself not to rely on other people.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed990a514884a0c9
Red link & wanted articles patrols! - wanted article started.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed999fe1f6e8ddf7
Yeah, I found the Library of Congress's link as well as tons of other useful stuff on and about the Soviet Union, but I am really interested to find out more about this New Soviet Man. Anyone has ideas about this or suggestion on where to look for more information/details? Thanks for your help.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed9a3c6b19db3b85
Hi! I think the article you are looking for (that already contains many of the points you want to make) is 9/11 conspiracy theories. I hope this is helpful.
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed9b554da5956062
You're right! for once. But bear in mind that I wrote 7% of Wikipedia so as an AUTODIDACT you were probably learned by me. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
ed9bf670451fa629
Jime1138 I never said the articled was retracted. Please pay attention. The statement was retracted and quoting half of a retracted statement is misleading. Get a life because you are obviously enjoying having this terribly biased article out to mislead the public. Did you choose to suck at life or are you paid to do so?
0
0
1
0
0
0
ed9c1efb41f02916
Hi Bruno Hi Bruno. How's things? I'll get the SPI together over the wknd. Cheers,
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda032a6a6194ddc
September 2008 Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda09267aa14a7b7
By the way, you can blank the pages, or delete them by putting on top of them
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda0bc89f020949d
" This Evolution Thread Is A Perfect Example Of Why No One Ever Takes Wikipedia Seriously There is no such process as ""evolution"". It does not exist. ""Evolution"" is FICTIONAL. There is no process in which species morph into other species. There is no process in which fish jump out of the ocean, decide they will start breathing air, grow arms and legs and eventually morph into a multitude of various land creatures. ""Evolution"" can only be described at best as a science fiction spoof, and it is really even too preposterous for that The simplest way I can get this through your moronic heads Unicellular organisms DO NOT convert into multicellular organisms. End of story, end of your crock theory Forget the fact that there are no ""transitional"" fossils on Earth, or that it is impossible for a DNA code to spontaneously add or subtract chromosomes (become a different species), or that this asinine process has NEVER happened once in the entire recorded history of biology. Forget the fact that every scientific and biological fact known to man prove that ""evolution"" does not exist and never could. Or that every single legitimate scientist in the world realizes ""evolution"" is a farce ""There is no such thing as evolution."" ~Albert Einstein Forget all of that and just get that first fact through your head. Single cell organisms do not convert to multi-celled. You're insane species morphing crock of idiocy is DOA You can scream and lie and distort and deny fact, but it will not change anything and it will never make this farce come true. It will only make you look like a raging retard What you need to do is realize this and get this mental pollution out of your head"
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda33140981ec517
the “40,000 protesters” myth I understand that some members have a politically motivated desire to make the 2010 election look as sinister and anti-democratic as possible, but you have to get the facts straight about these four sources on “40,000 protesters”.1. This one shouldn't be considered altogether. It is a UNHCR page quoting instead of a reliable news source a Washington-based “foundation” whose purpose is: “to inform and educate policy makers and the broader policy community about events and trends in those societies which are strategically or tactically important to the United States and which frequently restrict access to such information.” . It is a politically biased organization, not an independent news source. So, out with it!2. These two , are respectively the Voice of America and MSNBC (not MSNBC really but a direct quote from Bloomberg here). So in reality it is VoA and Bloomberg. Well, let me inform you that we are talking about the same guy - his name is James Brooke, as anyone can plainly see since 2006 he has been stationed in Moscow to report for Bloomberg and as of last summer for the VoA as well. Leaving aside the fact that the VoA is more of a propaganda tool fully owned by US government rather than an independent news source, let's see how Mr. Brooke came about this magic number - “40,000”. Apparently he was there, but did he count the demonstrators himself? No, he quotes Associated Press: “Within an hour, the Associated Press was estimating the turnout at 40,000.”! Well, it wasn't. Anyone can see the number of AP and that number is 10,000. A little white lie, Mr. Brooke. Or maybe I'm too harsh, maybe AP did broadcast that number intially, but then seeing how preposterous it was quickly brought it down to what all the other major media guys were reporting. In any event, this “40,000 people” thing doesn't hold water.3. Basically the same goes for CBC as well. As I already said in one of the comments not only CBC didn't have its own staff in Minsk that night (I checked this myself here in Toronto with CBC Headquarters), anyone can see how heavily in that article it relied on other media: “Reuters reported...The Associated Press reported...”. As we know already from these , quotes both Reuters and Associated Press mentioned 10,000 protesters each. Given all the above I'm removing the “40,000 people” part from the article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda367886d8e0db9
Thank you, you're reply was very satisfying. I'm in a dispute and waiting for a response to continue on the discussion. —
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda45b940fc7b196
"Mi name is Cherita. Im a writer. Im quite ""mad"" about writing and mi dreams. I just had to send u a message, just because of the irony LOL"
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda50de35de55486
"==Notability of Michael Fout== A tag has been placed on Michael Fout requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
eda8c1f0f75cfbd8
REDIRECT User talk:Dream out loud/Archive 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
edaa4e3daf0d8627
Never heard of it at all. I had heard of the Fife cup just not exactly what it was. I hit a snag with updating the stats on Raith rovers for the Fife cup it appears the template only takes a maximum of four cups. So i managed to update the dunfermline stats ok as they only participate in three competitions. The result is included just not the stats for it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
edab9e7e5b952709
" Precious again tuning Thank you for quality articles on tuning and mathematicians, even fictitious ones, for tuned comments to well-wishers, and for striving for serenity when you are ""right but others are not ready to listen"", - you are an ! A year ago, you were the 220th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style. Stay tuned "
0
0
0
0
0
0
edae991b2ff0d3c0
GA Ohio State Route 369 I have placed the review on hold to give you an opportunity to address state concerns. This is the second short spur road that you have nominated for GA. One must question why you are devoting valuable and limited volunteer resources to highways of less than 2 miles in length when the major Ohio roads such as OH 4 lack even route descriptions. Perhaps you might want to tackle the main roads first. Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
edaf11bd30e297c6
Winter Nose I replaced the material that the anonymous user 149.63.96.145 removed for no apparent reason; it's a well-known issue with the Maltese breed and is considered pertinent information. 17:23, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
edb159cf10a6f886
Since my block 6 days ago, Iss246 (and his close friend, outside of Wikipedia, psyc12) immediately, frantically and systematically reverted 'masses' of established, reliably sourced edits, only hours after I was blocked. In fact, every single edit that I, through consensus, had ever established and stayed in place. These were very well sourced, solid edits. Many of these edits in numerous articles had been established and remained unchanged for over 3, even 6 months, depending on the article page. Many of these reverts during the last week, also undid the work of other editors involved in developing the 'consensus' that then stayed in place. The only editor, truly independent on these articles recently, was an editor Mark viking. He made this valid comment on the Talk:Health psychology page. He seems quite genuine, but then his comments were actually 'deleted' entirely from the public talk page? He was the only editor who commented on the rapid, systematic 'demolition job' and complete 'censorship' of my edits to these article pages containing months old, established edits, with multiple, reliable sources attached to them. Mark viking said this to psyc12 . Thanks for expanding that section, but it seems you removed a sourced assertion on the origin of OHP. Do you dispute that source, or have a source asserting that OHP and I/O psychology are totally separate? I ask this because the relation of these fields seems to be an area of contention at WP, and removal of sources isn't going to help. I invite anyone to look at the combined edit history of iss246 (and his close friend/colleague outside of wikipedia), psyc12 since the 16th of January until today in 'numerous articles.' These 'Wikipedia owned' articles are again now, grossly biased and distorted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
edb1b8aa1780c90c
" Approvals I checked and the changes made to the references based on Imzadi's peer review are fine. ><>°° "
0
0
0
0
0
0