tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
ee2fee92c35788af	And your point is...? It's just an image. Who cares about which one you think is better? This isn't your site. Nobody cares if you used to work for the Transit Authority. All that nonsensical vandalism just for a damn image? Oh wow. Get over it and move on with your life. It's not that serious.	0	0	0	0
ee30b5a2f86738f9	" I just reviewed the MOS and it looks like they have recently certified ""Blockquote"" tag use. The quotation template is based on the Blockquote tag but includes boxes / background. Let me submit the question on the talk if this tag is the recommendation for long quotations. (talk) "	0	0	0	0
ee313f78667346a7	Please either blank my comment entirely, or leave it alone. It's a signed and dated comment, so to have it changed by another is not on.	0	0	0	0
ee31becd7cc6203a	:Flyupload A tag has been placed on Flyupload, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Flyupload is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on Talk:Flyupload, explaining how Flyupload is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. babble	0	0	0	0
ee32643c2a624bc8	This sounds very like original research. There's bound to be tons of such commentary generated by the right wing noise machine over the coming months following Gore's award, but I'd never heard of any general problem with the criteria used up until this week. We shouldn't be hasty in using recent sources at any rate, should criticism be added.	0	0	0	0
ee353727940d8b3c	I'm a Wikininja. (talk to me)	0	0	0	0
ee36e20e97094a0d	" deleted ""Archive Okina"" Posted to Accounting4Taste also: 04:50, 25 April 2008 Accounting4Taste (Talk \| contribs) deleted ""Archive Okina"" ‎ (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: Article mistakenly archived into article space moved to userspace) if you felt it was inappropriate to have in archive, then why put it in my space? Remove it completely if it is not sufficient for archive (done to clear space to continue the debate on appropriate usage of Hawaiian grammer are you familar with this discussion? It is important & that is why I felt It wasn't deemed to be deleted but archieved for others to refer back to.)"	0	0	0	0
ee3ac565418ae9fe	" I disagree. We should have every thread available for immediate use, no matter HOW log the page takes to load or how hard it is to find any relevant information amongst all the outdated threads. Plus, we can make it into the Guinness Book of World Records for longest Wikipedia Talk Page. What was that? You don't believe me? OK, fine, I agree... ~ {talk/contrib} "	0	0	0	0
ee3c367c7ccdfb78	" Arguing with a source inline is not an improvement for whatever views aren't being mentioned. Merely arguing against a source from your personal knowledge or opinion is original work, not what we do here. In particular, you miss the point by noting that carbon reductions from wind power occur wherever the wind power gets consumed, because the article is not primarily about carbon reduction, it's about how grid managers can handle intermittent power sources on the grid. The intermittencies of wind and solar power matter because the grid functions not only to generate carbon offsets but also (and primarily) to supply electricity when customers demand it. "	0	0	0	0
ee3cb8828890fab4	Image Hi.. image for [Wieck] was taken from the Univ. of Maine website, and prof. Wieck gave the permission for it, but I didn't know that wouldn't count. So I would need the permission of the univ. of maine, or can I specify that it was from the University's website?? Thanks! Lana	0	0	0	0
ee3cc3e12021c943	" Outsiders' opinions wanted Hi, I just though I might ask you. Currently there is a debate whether to move Partitions of Poland to Partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The first one is shorter and looks like it is more commonly used. The second one is politically & historically correct. Could you voice your opinion on the talk page? Because now it's all Lithuanians and Polish who fight each other ) We need someone ""unbiased."" I would very much appreciate it. "	0	0	0	0
ee3d918f71685c4b	Wow... This page is so awful. It has some decent information but it looks like a 12 year old wrote a C grade essay. I'd like to get some people to help me fix it up. 137.92.97.111	1	0	0	0
ee3e1ae80b7b47ee	" What the hell does that mean? Talk English not Wiklish. Are you some kind of homomorph? -) As to RoyBoy, he is not very good at checking his facts. Even a cursory Google would show that Jonathan Sarfatti and Jack Sarfatti are not the same person and live on different continents. Notice how silent the Great Mathematician Dr. Hillman is in the light of Nobel Prize physicist Brian Josephson's remark above putting him in his proper place and in Hillman's inability to respond to Sarfatti's detailed argument above. It is not enough to bluster ""it's nonsense"". Burinski will also respond he is not on e-mail all the time. None of your facts check out. Everything Sarfatti has said is the truth and his arguments on the physics have not been refuted. You people not only have no respect for truth, you simply cannot even perceive it because this information is too advanced for all of you - even Chris Hillman who is not a physicist although he is a mathematician of sorts - he admits he is not even interested in quantum theory so he should recuse himself if he were really honest. Brian Josephson wrote the reality above. SIGNED JackHorner from The Corner 11:42 Pacific Time Sept 25, 2005"	1	0	0	0
ee3ea441be50feb3	GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 1959/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: (talk · contribs) I'll be able to review this in depth later today. Doing a quick scan of the article, everything so far looks good.	0	0	0	0
ee40a170aaa310c4	On Quantification (existential/universal: there exists/for all) My dear argues: You can't use the term some critics when you're listing the same bloke twice ...(my emphasis: heh, it is a 'blockquote' too;-) As long as the Universe of Discourse contains at least one member with the predicated quality logic tells me I am empowered to use the existential quantifier. In English, that's some. Now that's to be distinguished from 'several' which is a usual indicator of more than, say, two or three. So to use the word 'several,' in an argument, is to imply, at least more than two. So when an acquaintance of ours, name of , known to Block and recently given some Wiki admin. priviliges (AP) cites in his AP pleading: He has been in dispute with several editors ... he's padding his case, since Blacketer full well knows that the only folks giving grief were: Block Blacketer This came about because I started adding much more material to the Wiki entry on Natascha Engel and, in my innocence, I sidled-up to the Village Pump to seek advice on the substantiation of some of my contributions. I was particularly perplexed by the problem of my knowing certain facts through my personal correspondence with her. Extensive source is available on the Talk page for the Engel article about what transpired next. Well, anyway, Galloglass left the scene pretty quickly, so that left me contending with Block and Blacketer. Now correct me if I'm being stupid, but to me that leaves two. Then, mid-ocean Block jumps ship claiming a syndrome he named 'wikibonked' (I think - I've no idea what it means, but I think I'm getting to the stage where I may have caught a dose;-) So that left one ... Blacketer. So 'one' is Blacketer's version of 'several.' And then you made him an administrator. I've brought Blacketer to the stage since he's part of the same story of the 'double-standards' and 'hypocrisy' that I've discovered around here. Oh, if you get a chance and want a cheap laugh, ask Blacketer what being a 'candidate' connotes ... ... to be continued ...	0	0	0	0
ee40e396085c495b	What comes after the third paragraph is not only trivial but, more importantly, gives no sources. So, yeah, I tend to agree.	0	0	0	0
ee42b14c4ed4821f	refs http://www.ite.org/membersonly/itejournal/pdf/JKA85A24.pdf	0	0	0	0
ee434e077c9867bd	herkimer dimonds do you know anything else about herkimer dimonds?	0	0	0	0
ee44731872c144ed	"Thank you for experimenting with the page Flapjack on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk "	0	0	0	0
ee44a35b4f11620c	sound off , becuase that would be alluring to men. Most scholars to agree that a woman can expose her hands/face in front of men who aren't mahram.	0	0	0	0
ee45b499ddbe7bf1	May '07 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.	0	0	0	0
ee4685853d847485	June 2009 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.	0	0	0	0
ee468c974fc93fdc	" 's RFA I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one! \| huh? "	0	0	0	0
ee46b38beec14ad3	" Streptococcus mutans "	0	0	0	0
ee4896e6f170131a	That'll do fine. Thanks.	0	0	0	0
ee49067e9ed110b2	m00t for prom king. We love you, m00t.	0	0	0	0
ee493e28224b9013	Polypodium The polypodium link goes to a plant page, not a jellyfish page. Is there any reason for this? How can an animal be related that closely to an archaeplastid?	0	0	0	0
ee4bfa385a636e35	Emergency services I'm not sure this section should even exist, it borders on the ridiculous. Do we think people come to wikipedia when their house is on fire or they have a burglar hit their place? Also, don't they have 911 service?	0	0	0	0
ee507e5c2403aecc	" ""Evil as excess I removed the following phrase: It has been suggested that not all evil is due to a privation; malaria, for example, is due to not a lacking, but an excess (in this case, of disease).[6] It was referred to a ""Beginner's guide"" and as such is not very convincing. In this way any type of evil may be explained: as an excess of a particular ""carrier of evil"". But it is clearly a logical blunder: it is simply a regression (""sweeping under the carpet"" of the issue): it does not explain how the ""carrier of evil"" have got the evil to carry. To explain it for a layman: the fridge may be described as a ""carrier of cold"", but it does not bring ""cold"" (although we may colloquially say so): in fact, it removes heat. "	0	0	0	0
ee5177cd8d5f31f4	Explain how that argument was fallacious? You argue for merge, with no reson, I explain that there is consensus for this article (see AFD), so it can not be merged. Please continue to argue from here. If you want to rename, argue for rename, not for merge! talk	0	0	0	0
ee523d13fc200011	" Request for clarification Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_October_26#Category:Fictional_businesspeople Per the discussion, is that ""keep"" or ""keep only as a parent category""? - "	0	0	0	0
ee525a6a08459c65	Dombeya rotundifolia Hi, could you tell me what has been happening at the above page? Thanks	0	0	0	0
ee531d260f04be80	makes the problem much worse	0	0	0	0
ee5730816b63cc51	its an AP article you asshole, how is it not neutral???	1	1	1	0
ee57cf3ebf0ecf6f	Why did you make a false claim that was only exposed when people like me investigated it? I'm sure there's a good reason.	0	0	0	0
ee5a8afc4df37fc8	Removal of sourced content Re List of new religious movement and cult researchers You are removing sourced content and vandalizing the page.If you do not understand the criteria for inclusion on a list don't edit the page. You're supposed to be an experienced editor - act like one. Thanks	0	0	0	0
ee5c515904ec734d	Good God, Turian...why do you only CENSOR conservative points of view...and even on TALK pages. Pretty anal if you ask me. I can point out 3+ LIBERAL comments on the VERY talk page you CENSORED me on, that are guilty of EXACTLY what you are charging me with. Either DELETE all of those comments too, or mine goes up. Sorry, you don't get to do a ONE SIDED clean up job... 68.40.123.217	0	0	0	0
ee5cd9ccade229ea	Redirect (already done it). Someone misspelled it once, they'll misspell it again.	0	0	0	0
ee5d91d8bca68b43	Vandalism Please don't vandalise the Joseph Sobran article. Thanks. CaliforniaDreamlings	0	0	0	0
ee5e18a05b74d8b0	"}} Hi, I don't think we should let the minor issue of the vichy infobox hinder us from proceeding on more important problems with other articles. I wonder if you have had the time to check ""military history of WWII France"" further, and what you think of a split? Cheers, walk victor falk talk "	0	0	0	0
ee5fe040df3befac	Hubris Your unconscionable hubris will be your downfall. With the simple sword of truth will I vanquish ye. Indeed, woe unto ye, for I wax terrible, wielding the blade, ready to smite.	1	0	0	0
ee6040f61ead7aa3	D'Souza is a closeted homosexual. Proof can be found HERE: http://www.gayforpay.com	1	0	1	1
ee608da127e7f491	hey ur a douch bag dont edit my stuff	1	0	1	0
ee621553e6e6ec41	" Still got problems. Benedikz writes that BG became in 1851 ""chief assistant (Yfirkennari)""—to the rector, I suppose. Kaalund, however, writes ""Overlærer"", which I had translated as ""headmaster"". (In German, Oberlehrer.) So what precisely is an Yfirkennari? "	0	0	0	0
ee6226efa30324ae	Katr67, I apologize if that came across as uncivil. I meant it more towards Wikipedia in general than to you personally. We're all volunteers on here. I just see so much information on here that's unsourced, and so I found it a little ironic that something as apparently minor as this guy's involvement in a youth organization was insisted upon being sourced. But, this does follow Wikipedia's guidelines, and will respect such efforts in the future.	0	0	0	0
ee632487129dc2c3	The problem is that our dispute over the illustration is only one of the many problems. You still don't answer on etymology and many other thinks. Until you bring facts and convincing arguments on my objections, my version should stay. And POV tags can't be simply removed!	0	0	0	0
ee64761ad3743289	the Coolac geo site,	0	0	0	0
ee64bb66356aef5e	" ""Impale"" The source quoted does not use the word ""impale"", which is very strange in this context. The word ""impale"", which is derived from Latin pālus (stake), means ""to pierce with a sharp stake or point"" ( The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000). A person can be ""impaled on a stake"" if he is pushed on to its point. Since the stake the Jehovah's Witnesses have in mind seems not to be pointed, or at least not to have been used for piercing the body of Jesus, would it not be better to use ""fastened"" or ""pierced"" or some such word, rather than ""impaled"", for what was done to his hands (in the sense of the Greek word χεῖρες) and his feet? "	0	0	0	0
ee64d9dda96cd6e7	Please do not vandalise.	0	0	0	0
ee656bf9963aa9f5	"yo, fuck you ""amigo"". just settlin a score with a faggot you bean picker."	1	1	1	1
ee69405acb8937ed	" StillStanding-247 I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously didn't do much research then, you certainly didn't look at the lies and false accusations of sockpuppetry constantly thrown at StillStanding by the POV group he was running into; you didn't look into the harassment he received, the constant threats and promises of a campaign to have him blocked. You can accuse me of assuming bad faith if you want, but he had editors talking about him in veiled terms like ""our mutual friend"", talking about strategies to get him blocked, talking about having him blocked for creating a draft RfC page, and who actively went to have others blocked for trying to research diffs for that same page. There was no ""good faith"" involved in this, there was a pattern of bad-faith edits by a battleground-mentality POV group who happened to find a set of sympathetic admins to their cause. It's sad to see you are as corrupt as every other wikipedia admin. They are all either actively in bad faith or playing the ""I see nothing"" game."	0	0	0	0
ee6a65e8bd48fa4f	" Oooohhhhhhh..... I'm so sorry your highness, it will never happen again. pfff. You and your ""I really like cleaning up other people's messes"". So you you're better than everybody else... whatever!! Piss off!! Oh and ""messes""?!? lol!!"	1	0	0	0
ee6da72a2e4a62c8	NOT RETIRED JUST YET.	0	0	0	0
ee6eb240bc358ec1	(sometimes its hot and it burns my feet...)	0	0	0	0
ee6fc911f1156723	I have added a nice screenshot for you guys: http://jult.nl/printscreens/funwithwikipedia?full=1	0	0	0	0
ee728d81e510550d	The length of the new article bot output page varies depending on what it finds. I'm setting up a trial run at Portal:Cheshire/New articles bot page to see how it goes (also looking for problems with false positives) with rules at Talk	0	0	0	0
ee744cea646aee39	User:Communist FYI (not an April Fools Joke) someone has removed the Tfd tag from Template:User_Communist. Does that end the nomination process somehow? Gosh, that's easy. I'm sorry, but is that box immune from nominations for Tfd, while so many others are not, and have been speedy deleted (rightly so, I believe?) Guess so. I get more educated about Wikipedia bias every day.	0	0	0	0
ee7491ab4ad42de1	Vandalism Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.	0	0	0	0
ee7503081497dc29	" ?Regular Force? ""Regular Force"" is the templates name given to the link to the basic article ""Australian Army"" which is misleading; as the article (as it should) gives an overview of both Regular Army and Army Reserve elements. If some regular member is keen to create an article specifically on the ARA (excluding the reserve elements) in addition to the overall ""Australian Army"" that would be good. Linking the entire army, under a reg only link is inappropriate."	0	0	0	0
ee758a86d45ee521	Excuse me But are you the one orignally known as WWEJobber? I'm just asking because you are acting like him/her.	0	0	0	0
ee76eb8d5be42bcf	He was instrumental in the role of Coastal Forces during the run up to DDay, serving with the Polish Flotilla, and was related to Sir Phillipe de Carteret, who discovered the Pitcairns! You appear to lack many pages on RN servicemen and women - this man was decorated several times -	0	0	0	0
ee77c3913e2f97ec	NO VANDALISM committed QUIT your HARRASSMENT & Thuggery Dear wiki thug, there was no vandalism of the Maitreya article by me. The Baha'is have not made a case as to why there should be a mention of their creed in an article that is about Buddhism. You might not like that because the Baha'is apparently seem to be your friends and you are biased towards them, but this doesn't change the fact that they are the ones vandalizing wikipedia by gratuitously attempting to their stamp on every article - not I. Go use your threats and intimidation elsewhere, thug.	0	0	0	0
ee78116d99aa5663	" Hello NickCT Could you please describe where synthesis is occurring that is, can you show where the article is ""combining material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources""? Could you please describe what you think is a violation of WP:POV? WP:COATRACK is an essay, not a policy, so COATRACK issues are a matter of personal opinion, not of policy. A few points regarding deletion: There are several books, journal articles, chapters of bioethics textbooks, etc. that have been written specifically on the topic of this article (unethical, nonconsensual, and/or illegal medical experiments in the U.S.). They clearly separate this topic from that of human subject research in the United States in general. There exist articles for several other nations that are similar to this one, such as Nazi human experimentation, North Korean human experimentation, Japanese human experimentation. They exist for the same reason that this one should exist numerous high-quality reliable sources have identified these topics as worthy of study in themselves. A wide array of reliable sources have identified this article's topic as worthy of standing alone as an object of analysis, separate from the broader history of human subject research in general. Per WP:NOTABLE that means that the topic of this article is worth of its own article. Just because many of the experiments in this article are things that most people would consider ""bad"" (which is why most medical ethics textbooks generally use them as illustrations of ""bad science"") does not mean that it is ""biased"" to have an article on them. WP:NPOV does not say that articles can't be about ""bad things"". It says that we should neutrally report what reliable sources have to say about things, regardless of our moral/ethical views on them. This article neutrally reports what medical ethics texts, and histories of this topic have to say about it. I am not aware of anywhere in the article where it is not neutrally reporting what reliable sources are saying. That said, like all articles, this article is an incomplete work in progress, so there are certainly issues. Rather than merely citing policy without reference to this article, please make specific suggestions for how to improve this article. "	0	0	0	0
ee7c5e19388ea4bf	, but Davido, Phone Swap and Genevieve Nnaji will def be part of it	0	0	0	0
ee7ee204e36f70aa	Your accusations are false. I'm not trying to delete any accurate information; instead, I've added text & sources that help support the RS. Please let me know what you think about the section, irregardless of my previous blocks. Thanks.	0	0	0	0
ee7fcc27567343d0	" To edit, please log in. Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. We apologize for any inconvenience."	0	0	0	0
ee82f6d5409ca3af	I believe that whatever you think you are or you think about this topic is not relevant as you are not author but ONLY Wikipedist, Sir. My English may be not clear however believe, you understand well. It is not up to you to judge writers! I have to insist you include the information I have provided to the article. People do have right to know this information and you WILL NOT avoid this right.	0	0	0	0
ee83f4f5fe59f917	Editor should be listed as DocofSoc. Have no idea why former name is coming up.	0	0	0	0
ee8439b0085b271e	"Try answering these two first - Does the Second Amemdment protect the right ""to keep and bear arms"" or just the right ""to bear arms""? and Why is Saul Cornell, who is in the pay of the Joyce Foundation, receiving $400,000 JUST in start up funds, the person used for so many cites on this article. He outweighs the next guy by at least a factor of 2-3, aperhaps more. 96.237.123.191 "	0	0	0	0
ee874fc9996fa7fb	Freepsbane has been a busy little TROLL I see you have been busy harassing others while I was away. Don't plan on doing any editing on anything that is not protected TROLL.	0	0	0	0
ee87a137fe911170	Email I have noted the email sent. '''' (H2O)	0	0	0	0
ee89aee5593413f3	Millennium Items‎ pictures Hello. I was reviewing the Millennium Items article for deletion and I noticed that all of the pictures were uploaded as released to the public domain. However, these seem to be the same pictures uploaded to another wiki in June of 2006 (Here). I'm going to assume good faith and ask here first where these images came from. If these images aren't free, then the project faces non-trivial legal exposure from keeping them. If they are free, then there is no problem and I apologize for the intrusion. Also, since you contributed those images, you may want to participate in the AfD for that page. Thanks!	0	0	0	0
ee8bacafa87cf0a0	Go to the library, search for Anthony Blunt, lookup homosexuality in the index, read. Wikipedia is not the end-all.	0	0	0	0
ee8c6628c118a1b3	Harvard Sucks. Talk	1	0	1	0
ee8d964d0646f187	and being able to define themselves	0	0	0	0
ee8ffbcb07cc9d89	" A sense of ""postulate"" is ""propose the existence of"" and that seems to be the sense used here. And it was Maxwell that first postulated the constant speed of light (in 1898 I believe), which is necessarily independent of inertial frame of reference."	0	0	0	0
ee9026310dcda14b	The bastard always does it to me. An eye for an eye. Sean.hoyland is a fucking cunt.	1	1	1	0
ee91325757c52095	" Happy birthday Have a great birthday, Themcman1! Good health, and good luck! —what a crazy random happenstance "	0	0	0	0
ee95241fc79960d0	Hey jerk we may do a deal: please let in peace the articles of Carl Grissom and Bob the goon. Also unlock the Chase Meridian articles and accept that Jack Napier are in Batman Forever. In change I let of vandalize the user articles.	1	0	0	0
ee9697785fe41ff8	" Thanks Xeno. - • Talk • "	0	0	0	0
ee96ed6d8ae1552f	" In my opinion, the sheer number of sources for the section that are ""liberal"" bespeak lack of balance which I'll try, at least, to rectify by maybe finding a useful quote from Mark Skousen's piece on Beck and his uncle in Human Events magazine. "	0	0	0	0
ee997b531b908906	RV in Lead section Dear Kathmandu2007 I notice that you reverted my moderation of the language of a paragraph on the royalty, in the Lead section, that in my opinion had a rather strong accusative tone. I understand the feelings of the suffering people, but facts can be conveyed equally effectively in a dignified and moderate way. Please have a second look at it and do as you consider appropriate. Thanks and regards from a well-wisher of the subcontinent.	0	0	0	0
ee9a642cdf05d2b2	"=== 1 December 2006 === The edit you made to Grandfather clause (this revision) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in making useful contributions, see the welcome page and the introduction to editing. However, please do not continue to vandalise pages; such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from further editing – "	0	0	0	0
ee9c0d0101629957	Mind taking a look at the MHP mediation? I'm interested in you thoughts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Monty_Hall_problem Thanks.	0	0	0	0
ee9ce469ea159a1c	At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the rifle he deliberately kept to prove his innocence, would never be scientifically tested by forensic experts. At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the fatal bullet would never be found. At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the spent cartridge would never be found. Conclusion: No scientific ballistic forensic evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. 60.224.64.166	0	0	0	0
eea1b76deb33716b	I think a pass remains a pass even if it is batted. Sometimes you hear a pass being incomplete when it's batted down. But further down on this page, I recalled that a pass was batted up in the air in the end zone, and the quarterback was able to get to the ball and bat it out of the end zone. And I recall that Roger Staubach (still playing for Navy?) had a pass batted up in the air; he caught it, threw it again, and drew a penalty call for throwing that 2nd pass.	0	0	0	0
eea2a64448986a1e	I have removed that NPOV-section tag as you seem to have no argument as to what is not neutral about the presentation of the KHRP quote. I have also re-added the (quite reasonable) map caption. Please do not revert without offering a valid justification. —	0	0	0	0
eea398a26c6df0cf	Toronto''' Hamilton, Toronto,and Oshawa are now tethered together with the criteria set forth in the article. As such, Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa form I contiguous urban area, and reaches a pop near 6 mil. Check google earth if you have any doubts.	0	0	0	0
eeaec33f9d92d85d	Hi, Hitler! ... I have a Primary source and you always dont want reconoce that... Why?..vandalism ., ok.... Moi	1	0	0	0
eeaf0dcaa82bd22f	The article all ready stated this.	0	0	0	0
eeaf2db9594f7742	T violation The discussion of why a nonzero EDM for the neutron violates P and T (and thus CP) is not strictly true: for a spin-1/2 particle the only axis of quantisation and thus the only well defined direction is proportional to its spin. Hence, we have to define the EDM d to be along that axis; the term entering the Hamiltonian is -d.E, which is T-odd and P-odd. Acting with T reverses the neutron's spin and thus d; acting with P reverses the direction of E hence giving rise to the CP violation. (http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.3100v3) I'm not convinced by the magnetic moment picture painted, and I may well update the page after consulting with my more learned colleagues. 129.67.119.242	0	0	0	0
eeafbcbafaf64d88	Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.	0	0	0	0
eeb06c19ec88d418	" When leaveing a messsage Don't post it on my user page I have a talk page for a reason.eagle "	0	0	0	0
eeb10a1689977a76	". If the ""late Angeloi"" map doesn't cover to 1204, then we probably want one of those too, for easy visual comparison."	0	0	0	0
eeb12edcb23c0d8c	Let's just ignore this IP, given their other edits and block and the need to oversight one personal attack, he/she will be blocked again shortly, possibly by me.	0	0	0	0
eeb39c8f069fae23	LOL you're one of those suck ups to Roger, the article mentions. By the way I've met you and I think that you're whiny piss ant of a man. It's a pity that over the past two decades the internet has evolved to work in favor of creatures like you. IRL you're nothing to the world, yet like a self deluded Fitzcarraldo you've now found your virtual hill on which to drag your boat. So glad you've been finally exposed. Please do rebut, we're all waiting. LOL. 86.182.41.0	1	1	1	0
eeb47244261d003d	Your excellent spelling skills are so noted.	0	0	0	0
eeb54d51887db639	" Tried and convicted in IsraeL? The following is not supported and because of it's extreme nature, needs to be proven and discussed here first. Was Rabbi Kahane ""tried and convicted in Israel"" for """"conspiring to commit acst of violence""? ""Kahane received a felony conviction in the United States for conspiring to make bombs and was tried and convicted in Israel for conspiracy to commit acts of violence in a foreign country."" Please add your views. "	0	0	0	0
eeb5ebb1de1125c3	I kid you not, cunt.	1	1	0	0
eeb66c5a85518548	It must be a confusion with Schengen, which unified European policy concerning security matters.	0	0	0	0

ee2fee92c35788af

And your point is...? It's just an image. Who cares about which one you think is better? This isn't your site. Nobody cares if you used to work for the Transit Authority. All that nonsensical vandalism just for a damn image? Oh wow. Get over it and move on with your life. It's not that serious.

0

ee30b5a2f86738f9

" I just reviewed the MOS and it looks like they have recently certified ""Blockquote"" tag use. The quotation template is based on the Blockquote tag but includes boxes / background. Let me submit the question on the talk if this tag is the recommendation for long quotations. (talk) "

0

ee313f78667346a7

Please either blank my comment entirely, or leave it alone. It's a signed and dated comment, so to have it changed by another is not on.

0

ee31becd7cc6203a

:Flyupload A tag has been placed on Flyupload, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Flyupload is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on Talk:Flyupload, explaining how Flyupload is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. babble

0

ee32643c2a624bc8

This sounds very like original research. There's bound to be tons of such commentary generated by the right wing noise machine over the coming months following Gore's award, but I'd never heard of any general problem with the criteria used up until this week. We shouldn't be hasty in using recent sources at any rate, should criticism be added.

0

ee353727940d8b3c

I'm a Wikininja. (talk to me)

0

ee36e20e97094a0d

" deleted ""Archive Okina"" Posted to Accounting4Taste also: 04:50, 25 April 2008 Accounting4Taste (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Archive Okina"" ‎ (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: Article mistakenly archived into article space moved to userspace) if you felt it was inappropriate to have in archive, then why put it in my space? Remove it completely if it is not sufficient for archive (done to clear space to continue the debate on appropriate usage of Hawaiian grammer are you familar with this discussion? It is important & that is why I felt It wasn't deemed to be deleted but archieved for others to refer back to.)"

0

ee3ac565418ae9fe

" I disagree. We should have every thread available for immediate use, no matter HOW log the page takes to load or how hard it is to find any relevant information amongst all the outdated threads. Plus, we can make it into the Guinness Book of World Records for longest Wikipedia Talk Page. What was that? You don't believe me? OK, fine, I agree... ~ {talk/contrib} "

0

ee3c367c7ccdfb78

" Arguing with a source inline is not an improvement for whatever views aren't being mentioned. Merely arguing against a source from your personal knowledge or opinion is original work, not what we do here. In particular, you miss the point by noting that carbon reductions from wind power occur wherever the wind power gets consumed, because the article is not primarily about carbon reduction, it's about how grid managers can handle intermittent power sources on the grid. The intermittencies of wind and solar power matter because the grid functions not only to generate carbon offsets but also (and primarily) to supply electricity when customers demand it. "

0

ee3cb8828890fab4

Image Hi.. image for [Wieck] was taken from the Univ. of Maine website, and prof. Wieck gave the permission for it, but I didn't know that wouldn't count. So I would need the permission of the univ. of maine, or can I specify that it was from the University's website?? Thanks! Lana

0

ee3cc3e12021c943

" Outsiders' opinions wanted Hi, I just though I might ask you. Currently there is a debate whether to move Partitions of Poland to Partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The first one is shorter and looks like it is more commonly used. The second one is politically & historically correct. Could you voice your opinion on the talk page? Because now it's all Lithuanians and Polish who fight each other ) We need someone ""unbiased."" I would very much appreciate it. "

0

ee3d918f71685c4b

Wow... This page is so awful. It has some decent information but it looks like a 12 year old wrote a C grade essay. I'd like to get some people to help me fix it up. 137.92.97.111

1

0

ee3e1ae80b7b47ee

" What the hell does that mean? Talk English not Wiklish. Are you some kind of homomorph? -) As to RoyBoy, he is not very good at checking his facts. Even a cursory Google would show that Jonathan Sarfatti and Jack Sarfatti are not the same person and live on different continents. Notice how silent the Great Mathematician Dr. Hillman is in the light of Nobel Prize physicist Brian Josephson's remark above putting him in his proper place and in Hillman's inability to respond to Sarfatti's detailed argument above. It is not enough to bluster ""it's nonsense"". Burinski will also respond he is not on e-mail all the time. None of your facts check out. Everything Sarfatti has said is the truth and his arguments on the physics have not been refuted. You people not only have no respect for truth, you simply cannot even perceive it because this information is too advanced for all of you - even Chris Hillman who is not a physicist although he is a mathematician of sorts - he admits he is not even interested in quantum theory so he should recuse himself if he were really honest. Brian Josephson wrote the reality above. SIGNED JackHorner from The Corner 11:42 Pacific Time Sept 25, 2005"

1

0

ee3ea441be50feb3

GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 1959/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: (talk · contribs) I'll be able to review this in depth later today. Doing a quick scan of the article, everything so far looks good.

0

ee40a170aaa310c4

On Quantification (existential/universal: there exists/for all) My dear argues: You can't use the term some critics when you're listing the same bloke twice ...(my emphasis: heh, it is a 'blockquote' too;-) As long as the Universe of Discourse contains at least one member with the predicated quality logic tells me I am empowered to use the existential quantifier. In English, that's some. Now that's to be distinguished from 'several' which is a usual indicator of more than, say, two or three. So to use the word 'several,' in an argument, is to imply, at least more than two. So when an acquaintance of ours, name of , known to Block and recently given some Wiki admin. priviliges (AP) cites in his AP pleading: He has been in dispute with several editors ... he's padding his case, since Blacketer full well knows that the only folks giving grief were: Block Blacketer This came about because I started adding much more material to the Wiki entry on Natascha Engel and, in my innocence, I sidled-up to the Village Pump to seek advice on the substantiation of some of my contributions. I was particularly perplexed by the problem of my knowing certain facts through my personal correspondence with her. Extensive source is available on the Talk page for the Engel article about what transpired next. Well, anyway, Galloglass left the scene pretty quickly, so that left me contending with Block and Blacketer. Now correct me if I'm being stupid, but to me that leaves two. Then, mid-ocean Block jumps ship claiming a syndrome he named 'wikibonked' (I think - I've no idea what it means, but I think I'm getting to the stage where I may have caught a dose;-) So that left one ... Blacketer. So 'one' is Blacketer's version of 'several.' And then you made him an administrator. I've brought Blacketer to the stage since he's part of the same story of the 'double-standards' and 'hypocrisy' that I've discovered around here. Oh, if you get a chance and want a cheap laugh, ask Blacketer what being a 'candidate' connotes ... ... to be continued ...

0

ee40e396085c495b

What comes after the third paragraph is not only trivial but, more importantly, gives no sources. So, yeah, I tend to agree.

0

ee42b14c4ed4821f

refs http://www.ite.org/membersonly/itejournal/pdf/JKA85A24.pdf

0

ee434e077c9867bd

herkimer dimonds do you know anything else about herkimer dimonds?

0

ee44731872c144ed

"Thank you for experimenting with the page Flapjack on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk "

0

ee44a35b4f11620c

sound off , becuase that would be alluring to men. Most scholars to agree that a woman can expose her hands/face in front of men who aren't mahram.

0

ee45b499ddbe7bf1

May '07 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

0

ee4685853d847485

June 2009 Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

0

ee468c974fc93fdc

" 's RFA I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one! | huh? "

0

ee46b38beec14ad3

" Streptococcus mutans "

0

ee4896e6f170131a

That'll do fine. Thanks.

0

ee49067e9ed110b2

m00t for prom king. We love you, m00t.

0

ee493e28224b9013

Polypodium The polypodium link goes to a plant page, not a jellyfish page. Is there any reason for this? How can an animal be related that closely to an archaeplastid?

0

ee4bfa385a636e35

Emergency services I'm not sure this section should even exist, it borders on the ridiculous. Do we think people come to wikipedia when their house is on fire or they have a burglar hit their place? Also, don't they have 911 service?

0

ee507e5c2403aecc

" ""Evil as excess I removed the following phrase: It has been suggested that not all evil is due to a privation; malaria, for example, is due to not a lacking, but an excess (in this case, of disease).[6] It was referred to a ""Beginner's guide"" and as such is not very convincing. In this way any type of evil may be explained: as an excess of a particular ""carrier of evil"". But it is clearly a logical blunder: it is simply a regression (""sweeping under the carpet"" of the issue): it does not explain how the ""carrier of evil"" have got the evil to carry. To explain it for a layman: the fridge may be described as a ""carrier of cold"", but it does not bring ""cold"" (although we may colloquially say so): in fact, it removes heat. "

0

ee5177cd8d5f31f4

Explain how that argument was fallacious? You argue for merge, with no reson, I explain that there is consensus for this article (see AFD), so it can not be merged. Please continue to argue from here. If you want to rename, argue for rename, not for merge! talk

0

ee523d13fc200011

" Request for clarification Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_October_26#Category:Fictional_businesspeople Per the discussion, is that ""keep"" or ""keep only as a parent category""? - "

0

ee525a6a08459c65

Dombeya rotundifolia Hi, could you tell me what has been happening at the above page? Thanks

0

ee531d260f04be80

makes the problem much worse

0

ee5730816b63cc51

its an AP article you asshole, how is it not neutral???

1

0

1

0

1

0

ee57cf3ebf0ecf6f

Why did you make a false claim that was only exposed when people like me investigated it? I'm sure there's a good reason.

0

ee5a8afc4df37fc8

Removal of sourced content Re List of new religious movement and cult researchers You are removing sourced content and vandalizing the page.If you do not understand the criteria for inclusion on a list don't edit the page. You're supposed to be an experienced editor - act like one. Thanks

0

ee5c515904ec734d

Good God, Turian...why do you only CENSOR conservative points of view...and even on TALK pages. Pretty anal if you ask me. I can point out 3+ LIBERAL comments on the VERY talk page you CENSORED me on, that are guilty of EXACTLY what you are charging me with. Either DELETE all of those comments too, or mine goes up. Sorry, you don't get to do a ONE SIDED clean up job... 68.40.123.217

0

ee5cd9ccade229ea

Redirect (already done it). Someone misspelled it once, they'll misspell it again.

0

ee5d91d8bca68b43

Vandalism Please don't vandalise the Joseph Sobran article. Thanks. CaliforniaDreamlings

0

ee5e18a05b74d8b0

"}} Hi, I don't think we should let the minor issue of the vichy infobox hinder us from proceeding on more important problems with other articles. I wonder if you have had the time to check ""military history of WWII France"" further, and what you think of a split? Cheers, walk victor falk talk "

0

ee5fe040df3befac

Hubris Your unconscionable hubris will be your downfall. With the simple sword of truth will I vanquish ye. Indeed, woe unto ye, for I wax terrible, wielding the blade, ready to smite.

1

0

ee6040f61ead7aa3

D'Souza is a closeted homosexual. Proof can be found HERE: http://www.gayforpay.com

1

0

1

ee608da127e7f491

hey ur a douch bag dont edit my stuff

1

0

1

0

ee621553e6e6ec41

" Still got problems. Benedikz writes that BG became in 1851 ""chief assistant (Yfirkennari)""—to the rector, I suppose. Kaalund, however, writes ""Overlærer"", which I had translated as ""headmaster"". (In German, Oberlehrer.) So what precisely is an Yfirkennari? "

0

ee6226efa30324ae

Katr67, I apologize if that came across as uncivil. I meant it more towards Wikipedia in general than to you personally. We're all volunteers on here. I just see so much information on here that's unsourced, and so I found it a little ironic that something as apparently minor as this guy's involvement in a youth organization was insisted upon being sourced. But, this does follow Wikipedia's guidelines, and will respect such efforts in the future.

0

ee632487129dc2c3

The problem is that our dispute over the illustration is only one of the many problems. You still don't answer on etymology and many other thinks. Until you bring facts and convincing arguments on my objections, my version should stay. And POV tags can't be simply removed!

0

ee64761ad3743289

the Coolac geo site,

0

ee64bb66356aef5e

" ""Impale"" The source quoted does not use the word ""impale"", which is very strange in this context. The word ""impale"", which is derived from Latin pālus (stake), means ""to pierce with a sharp stake or point"" ( The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000). A person can be ""impaled on a stake"" if he is pushed on to its point. Since the stake the Jehovah's Witnesses have in mind seems not to be pointed, or at least not to have been used for piercing the body of Jesus, would it not be better to use ""fastened"" or ""pierced"" or some such word, rather than ""impaled"", for what was done to his hands (in the sense of the Greek word χεῖρες) and his feet? "

0

ee64d9dda96cd6e7

Please do not vandalise.

0

ee656bf9963aa9f5

"yo, fuck you ""amigo"". just settlin a score with a faggot you bean picker."

1

0

1

0

1

ee69405acb8937ed

" StillStanding-247 I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously didn't do much research then, you certainly didn't look at the lies and false accusations of sockpuppetry constantly thrown at StillStanding by the POV group he was running into; you didn't look into the harassment he received, the constant threats and promises of a campaign to have him blocked. You can accuse me of assuming bad faith if you want, but he had editors talking about him in veiled terms like ""our mutual friend"", talking about strategies to get him blocked, talking about having him blocked for creating a draft RfC page, and who actively went to have others blocked for trying to research diffs for that same page. There was no ""good faith"" involved in this, there was a pattern of bad-faith edits by a battleground-mentality POV group who happened to find a set of sympathetic admins to their cause. It's sad to see you are as corrupt as every other wikipedia admin. They are all either actively in bad faith or playing the ""I see nothing"" game."

0

ee6a65e8bd48fa4f

" Oooohhhhhhh..... I'm so sorry your highness, it will never happen again. pfff. You and your ""I really like cleaning up other people's messes"". So you you're better than everybody else... whatever!! Piss off!! Oh and ""messes""?!? lol!!"

1

0

ee6da72a2e4a62c8

NOT RETIRED JUST YET.

0

ee6eb240bc358ec1

(sometimes its hot and it burns my feet...)

0

ee6fc911f1156723

I have added a nice screenshot for you guys: http://jult.nl/printscreens/funwithwikipedia?full=1

0

ee728d81e510550d

The length of the new article bot output page varies depending on what it finds. I'm setting up a trial run at Portal:Cheshire/New articles bot page to see how it goes (also looking for problems with false positives) with rules at Talk

0

ee744cea646aee39

User:Communist FYI (not an April Fools Joke) someone has removed the Tfd tag from Template:User_Communist. Does that end the nomination process somehow? Gosh, that's easy. I'm sorry, but is that box immune from nominations for Tfd, while so many others are not, and have been speedy deleted (rightly so, I believe?) Guess so. I get more educated about Wikipedia bias every day.

0

ee7491ab4ad42de1

Vandalism Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

0

ee7503081497dc29

" ?Regular Force? ""Regular Force"" is the templates name given to the link to the basic article ""Australian Army"" which is misleading; as the article (as it should) gives an overview of both Regular Army and Army Reserve elements. If some regular member is keen to create an article specifically on the ARA (excluding the reserve elements) in addition to the overall ""Australian Army"" that would be good. Linking the entire army, under a reg only link is inappropriate."

0

ee758a86d45ee521

Excuse me But are you the one orignally known as WWEJobber? I'm just asking because you are acting like him/her.

0

ee76eb8d5be42bcf

He was instrumental in the role of Coastal Forces during the run up to DDay, serving with the Polish Flotilla, and was related to Sir Phillipe de Carteret, who discovered the Pitcairns! You appear to lack many pages on RN servicemen and women - this man was decorated several times -

0

ee77c3913e2f97ec

NO VANDALISM committed QUIT your HARRASSMENT & Thuggery Dear wiki thug, there was no vandalism of the Maitreya article by me. The Baha'is have not made a case as to why there should be a mention of their creed in an article that is about Buddhism. You might not like that because the Baha'is apparently seem to be your friends and you are biased towards them, but this doesn't change the fact that they are the ones vandalizing wikipedia by gratuitously attempting to their stamp on every article - not I. Go use your threats and intimidation elsewhere, thug.

0

ee78116d99aa5663

" Hello NickCT Could you please describe where synthesis is occurring that is, can you show where the article is ""combining material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources""? Could you please describe what you think is a violation of WP:POV? WP:COATRACK is an essay, not a policy, so COATRACK issues are a matter of personal opinion, not of policy. A few points regarding deletion: There are several books, journal articles, chapters of bioethics textbooks, etc. that have been written specifically on the topic of this article (unethical, nonconsensual, and/or illegal medical experiments in the U.S.). They clearly separate this topic from that of human subject research in the United States in general. There exist articles for several other nations that are similar to this one, such as Nazi human experimentation, North Korean human experimentation, Japanese human experimentation. They exist for the same reason that this one should exist numerous high-quality reliable sources have identified these topics as worthy of study in themselves. A wide array of reliable sources have identified this article's topic as worthy of standing alone as an object of analysis, separate from the broader history of human subject research in general. Per WP:NOTABLE that means that the topic of this article is worth of its own article. Just because many of the experiments in this article are things that most people would consider ""bad"" (which is why most medical ethics textbooks generally use them as illustrations of ""bad science"") does not mean that it is ""biased"" to have an article on them. WP:NPOV does not say that articles can't be about ""bad things"". It says that we should neutrally report what reliable sources have to say about things, regardless of our moral/ethical views on them. This article neutrally reports what medical ethics texts, and histories of this topic have to say about it. I am not aware of anywhere in the article where it is not neutrally reporting what reliable sources are saying. That said, like all articles, this article is an incomplete work in progress, so there are certainly issues. Rather than merely citing policy without reference to this article, please make specific suggestions for how to improve this article. "

0

ee7c5e19388ea4bf

, but Davido, Phone Swap and Genevieve Nnaji will def be part of it

0

ee7ee204e36f70aa

Your accusations are false. I'm not trying to delete any accurate information; instead, I've added text & sources that help support the RS. Please let me know what you think about the section, irregardless of my previous blocks. Thanks.

0

ee7fcc27567343d0

" To edit, please log in. Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. We apologize for any inconvenience."

0

ee82f6d5409ca3af

I believe that whatever you think you are or you think about this topic is not relevant as you are not author but ONLY Wikipedist, Sir. My English may be not clear however believe, you understand well. It is not up to you to judge writers! I have to insist you include the information I have provided to the article. People do have right to know this information and you WILL NOT avoid this right.

0

ee83f4f5fe59f917

Editor should be listed as DocofSoc. Have no idea why former name is coming up.

0

ee8439b0085b271e

"Try answering these two first - Does the Second Amemdment protect the right ""to keep and bear arms"" or just the right ""to bear arms""? and Why is Saul Cornell, who is in the pay of the Joyce Foundation, receiving $400,000 JUST in start up funds, the person used for so many cites on this article. He outweighs the next guy by at least a factor of 2-3, aperhaps more. 96.237.123.191 "

0

ee874fc9996fa7fb

Freepsbane has been a busy little TROLL I see you have been busy harassing others while I was away. Don't plan on doing any editing on anything that is not protected TROLL.

0

ee87a137fe911170

Email I have noted the email sent. '''' (H2O)

0

ee89aee5593413f3

Millennium Items‎ pictures Hello. I was reviewing the Millennium Items article for deletion and I noticed that all of the pictures were uploaded as released to the public domain. However, these seem to be the same pictures uploaded to another wiki in June of 2006 (Here). I'm going to assume good faith and ask here first where these images came from. If these images aren't free, then the project faces non-trivial legal exposure from keeping them. If they are free, then there is no problem and I apologize for the intrusion. Also, since you contributed those images, you may want to participate in the AfD for that page. Thanks!

0

ee8bacafa87cf0a0

Go to the library, search for Anthony Blunt, lookup homosexuality in the index, read. Wikipedia is not the end-all.

0

ee8c6628c118a1b3

Harvard Sucks. Talk

1

0

1

0

ee8d964d0646f187

and being able to define themselves

0

ee8ffbcb07cc9d89

" A sense of ""postulate"" is ""propose the existence of"" and that seems to be the sense used here. And it was Maxwell that first postulated the constant speed of light (in 1898 I believe), which is necessarily independent of inertial frame of reference."

0

ee9026310dcda14b

The bastard always does it to me. An eye for an eye. Sean.hoyland is a fucking cunt.

1

0

1

0

1

0

ee91325757c52095

" Happy birthday Have a great birthday, Themcman1! Good health, and good luck! —what a crazy random happenstance "

0

ee95241fc79960d0

Hey jerk we may do a deal: please let in peace the articles of Carl Grissom and Bob the goon. Also unlock the Chase Meridian articles and accept that Jack Napier are in Batman Forever. In change I let of vandalize the user articles.

1

0

ee9697785fe41ff8

" Thanks Xeno. - • Talk • "

0

ee96ed6d8ae1552f

" In my opinion, the sheer number of sources for the section that are ""liberal"" bespeak lack of balance which I'll try, at least, to rectify by maybe finding a useful quote from Mark Skousen's piece on Beck and his uncle in Human Events magazine. "

0

ee997b531b908906

RV in Lead section Dear Kathmandu2007 I notice that you reverted my moderation of the language of a paragraph on the royalty, in the Lead section, that in my opinion had a rather strong accusative tone. I understand the feelings of the suffering people, but facts can be conveyed equally effectively in a dignified and moderate way. Please have a second look at it and do as you consider appropriate. Thanks and regards from a well-wisher of the subcontinent.

0

ee9a642cdf05d2b2

"=== 1 December 2006 === The edit you made to Grandfather clause (this revision) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in making useful contributions, see the welcome page and the introduction to editing. However, please do not continue to vandalise pages; such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from further editing – "

0

ee9c0d0101629957

Mind taking a look at the MHP mediation? I'm interested in you thoughts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Monty_Hall_problem Thanks.

0

ee9ce469ea159a1c

At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the rifle he deliberately kept to prove his innocence, would never be scientifically tested by forensic experts. At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the fatal bullet would never be found. At the time of recapture, Ryan had no reason to assume the spent cartridge would never be found. Conclusion: No scientific ballistic forensic evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. 60.224.64.166

0

eea1b76deb33716b

I think a pass remains a pass even if it is batted. Sometimes you hear a pass being incomplete when it's batted down. But further down on this page, I recalled that a pass was batted up in the air in the end zone, and the quarterback was able to get to the ball and bat it out of the end zone. And I recall that Roger Staubach (still playing for Navy?) had a pass batted up in the air; he caught it, threw it again, and drew a penalty call for throwing that 2nd pass.

0

eea2a64448986a1e

I have removed that NPOV-section tag as you seem to have no argument as to what is not neutral about the presentation of the KHRP quote. I have also re-added the (quite reasonable) map caption. Please do not revert without offering a valid justification. —

0

eea398a26c6df0cf

Toronto''' Hamilton, Toronto,and Oshawa are now tethered together with the criteria set forth in the article. As such, Toronto, Hamilton and Oshawa form I contiguous urban area, and reaches a pop near 6 mil. Check google earth if you have any doubts.

0

eeaec33f9d92d85d

Hi, Hitler! ... I have a Primary source and you always dont want reconoce that... Why?..vandalism ., ok.... Moi

1

0

eeaf0dcaa82bd22f

The article all ready stated this.

0

eeaf2db9594f7742

T violation The discussion of why a nonzero EDM for the neutron violates P and T (and thus CP) is not strictly true: for a spin-1/2 particle the only axis of quantisation and thus the only well defined direction is proportional to its spin. Hence, we have to define the EDM d to be along that axis; the term entering the Hamiltonian is -d.E, which is T-odd and P-odd. Acting with T reverses the neutron's spin and thus d; acting with P reverses the direction of E hence giving rise to the CP violation. (http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.3100v3) I'm not convinced by the magnetic moment picture painted, and I may well update the page after consulting with my more learned colleagues. 129.67.119.242

0

eeafbcbafaf64d88

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.

0

eeb06c19ec88d418

" When leaveing a messsage Don't post it on my user page I have a talk page for a reason.eagle "

0

eeb10a1689977a76

". If the ""late Angeloi"" map doesn't cover to 1204, then we probably want one of those too, for easy visual comparison."

0

eeb12edcb23c0d8c

Let's just ignore this IP, given their other edits and block and the need to oversight one personal attack, he/she will be blocked again shortly, possibly by me.

0

eeb39c8f069fae23

LOL you're one of those suck ups to Roger, the article mentions. By the way I've met you and I think that you're whiny piss ant of a man. It's a pity that over the past two decades the internet has evolved to work in favor of creatures like you. IRL you're nothing to the world, yet like a self deluded Fitzcarraldo you've now found your virtual hill on which to drag your boat. So glad you've been finally exposed. Please do rebut, we're all waiting. LOL. 86.182.41.0

1

0

1

0

1

0

eeb47244261d003d

Your excellent spelling skills are so noted.

0

eeb54d51887db639

" Tried and convicted in IsraeL? The following is not supported and because of it's extreme nature, needs to be proven and discussed here first. Was Rabbi Kahane ""tried and convicted in Israel"" for """"conspiring to commit acst of violence""? ""Kahane received a felony conviction in the United States for conspiring to make bombs and was tried and convicted in Israel for conspiracy to commit acts of violence in a foreign country."" Please add your views. "

0

eeb5ebb1de1125c3

I kid you not, cunt.

1

0

1

0

eeb66c5a85518548

It must be a confusion with Schengen, which unified European policy concerning security matters.

0