Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
fcb26e82171363bf
. you think you own the whole wikipedia to accuse me of a violation without considering your perceived accusation
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcb447673bfc0c71
" ""(or an example of who is being referred to)"" So are we saying here that editting any particular CATEGORY of individuals (in this case, clearly anti-semitic vandals), constitutes a PERSONAL ATTACK???"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcb63963a46e02dd
, not the motorcycle, not their enthusiasm
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcb79d3920ca197a
I did, with two sources. Stop edit warring, just knock it off.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcba1fca56fc3cf9
NawlinWiki, that is disgusting.
1
0
0
0
0
0
fcbab64518593a49
" How is oomska ""just some guy""? Clearly there are a number of writers represented on that site. In what way are you, 'Active Banana', more than ""just some guy""? Where on Oomska doe sit call itself a blog? Wikipedia may aspire to be Encyclopedia Britannica, but then I may aspire to be Martin Scorsese. Cannot get why a site must have a ""reputation"" for fact checking, in this instance, when the 'fact' in question is easily confirmed, by watching the film, which I personally have done. Have you? No. You rule-worshipping wiki nerds don't know anything about the subjects being covered, you spend your time learning the rules and then nit-picking through other people's contributions. Man, get a life! Ok, I think I'm gonna give up on this - how can ""just one guy"" hope to beat an army of pendants?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcbac4c3c530530f
I will have to state my worries about User: Billlion to a proper admin then.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcbad45be0fbc50d
glitter I like wiki.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcbb52e15ac07912
" The link was for illustration purposes. Google for ""CIA editing Wikipedia"" for thousands of articles. In any case, who cares about your opinion, here where everyone is equal. According to the disclaimer that is. No doubt however, you and your other nicks will have a smart comment on everything. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcbcdc79940deb32
you been great Rob, I can see why and where perfect is coming from. I can let all this cool down and I can stop editing a page, I don't think a indef block was appropriate, I was practically defending myself every day, also perfect made a reference to information online that we had a past, did you read that whole slam page perfect it also says I rape my family and killed other people from my actions, just want to give you a heads up, thanks for absorbing the worst possible reasons online to block me. never mind the back and forth between me and wikicohen, I am sure you took all of that into account first right,...sigh
1
0
0
0
0
0
fcbfae4a8d0e0b7b
" Just because a word is used in an opinion piece, blog, article, or letter to the editor does not mean it needs to be cited as an example. All of the examples are there because of their political point of view. They are completely subjective and inappropriate to the page. All of them should be removed. I'll go over a couple of them. ""Character assassination is the Karl Rove tactic of choice, eagerly mimicked by his media surrogates, whenever the White House is confronted by a critic who challenges it on matters of war. The Swift Boating is especially vicious if the critic has more battle scars than a president who connived to serve stateside and a vice president who had ""other priorities"" during Vietnam."" –Frank Rich in the August 21, 2005 New York Times[3] This is purely about Karl Rove, and the opinion writers thoughts on Karl Rove's tactics. It offers no meaning or insight to swiftboating. ""Swiftboating Cindy Sheehan""[6] ""Swiftboating the Crazies""[8] ""Swiftboating again""[9] ""Dean is being swiftboated.""[10] ""I do think the race offered one good opportunity for out-of-state Dems and Progressives, and that was to calmly write to newspapers and try to talk to receptive radio hosts about the swiftboating of the candidate.""[11] ""I’m glad the efforts to swiftboat Paul Hackett have been exposed for what they are.""[12] These are all blog entries which may or may not contain the word swiftboating. They serve no purpose other than to push a political agenda. Swiftboat ('swift bOt); transitive verb: (1) To accuse a public figure of questionable conduct without the benefit of physical evidence, usually by an entity informally associated with a person or entity benefiting from the accusation. Noun: (2) An unsubstantiated charge made against a public figure or organization, usually made by a proxy entity. See also: Smear, hatchet job, character assassination. (3) An organization dedicated to swiftboating on behalf of a respectable organization. (4) archaic: a type of boat used by the United States Navy to patrol the shores of Vietnam from 1965 to 1970; see also PCF. [14] This comes from some password protected forum. Seeing the word is defined above, I see no reason for it. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc0b5128ec7397e
" Wikipedia.info redirection? After reading the earlier discussion about the domain wikipedia.info, I visited the domain in question, and got a ""wiki does not exist"" message. When I go to wikipedia.com, I'm ""redirected"" to wikipedia.org. Why not with wikipedia.info? 18:03, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc31b3869369c77
" Speedy deletion of Harry Elwell A tag has been placed on Harry Elwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc3ba0ab339e7b3
" From the quote, I'd say the passage in the article is fairly heavy WP:Synthesis. It seems to have been a mixture of culture-clash and (perfectly justified) skepticism of the University's business practices rather than ""uncomprehension"". ''TalkStalk''(P) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc3c815ca63b03a
January 2011 (UTC) the J-10, despite rumours is not based on the lavi, chengdu was already working on a canard plane before the lavi program. the fact that you bring this up, raise question on sources of information, i hope it is not wikipedia ) Chengdu actually got technology from US (before USSR collapse, US allow chinese engineer to come to US and work with US defence contractors, this is documented) and Russia (after). both transfer were however incomplete and Chengdu had to adsorb the technology, the fact that they got input on modern technology form the 2 major power, is what make it logical that they can develop modern planes now. but seeing is believing, we have video of a thottle up, thottle down test on landing http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/VDrpLi8EER0/ showing it has operational engine. also the article you read is regarding J-10 problem which is unique to single engine planes. the J-11b has been equipped with chinese engine and flying in the elite unit near beijing, it hard to dispute something already in service. again i remind that this is just a prototype, it is not a production type. no one here suggest they can make a 100 of these economically. but making 1 working prototype is not that hard; remember that F22 prototype emerge years before US has the ability to mass produce them, that is the whole point of making prototypes, to solve problems. i really don't understand why some are acting like the existence of prototype must mean China has reach the same level as US, that just crazy thought. 218.186.8.234 00:57, 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc414f912c63849
Amandajm: Ignorant Muslim & Disgusting Anti-white Racist Reading back on racist, Amandajm - I've come to realize that in addition to his muslim name, he veritably hates white people. He deletes info about european history even if such info is based upon accurate inferences. Why he does this should be the subject of debate. My theory is that he's jealous of white culture and history being that he's muslim. Also, it's important to note that muslims of his poor ilk who exhibit such hatred additionally exude homosexual frustrations. This is well documented in psychiatric circles. Why a dirty, white-hating muslim should possess the reponsibility of writing an article on a culture and history not his own is WAY beyond me. If he wants to write about muslim history, he should. But, he shouldn't be given the chance to write about something he obviously knows nothing about and DOES NOT pertain to him. This guy IS NOT european. Honestly, he doesn't deserve to be on wiki at all. 'Stay on your side of the fence', is a motto I always quote. To that, yesterday I followed up by sending emails to Homeland Security and the FBI Counter-terrorism Division for investigation into who he is and what his motives are. (No, I've not gone off the deep end). I received an automatic response email from the FBI stating that they will look into the matter, and will definitley be following up. Racist muslims of this type are tricky and can pose a risk to the US. Also, I sent an email to wiki complaining about this enemy of europeans and americans. I got an email back from wiki stating that he will be reviewed - thank god! His place in wiki - and in the US - shouldn't be secure.
1
0
0
0
0
0
fcc5bd77af05d53b
"The citation for the point ""It helped setup the recently formed Sufi Muslim Council"" is not appropriate. The BBC article says ""Haras Rafiq, co-founder of the council, said the SMC had already formed a partnership with the British Muslim Forum (BMF)"". This is not the same as saying BMF helped set up SMC."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc7d8c578e0f7b4
| action1result = listed | action1oldid = 518034284 | currentstatus = GA
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcc9ce5ec2d81f70
Recent edits to the Omega Point (Tipler) article TFOWR, I would appreciate it if you could offer your opinion and/or assistance regarding the matter discussed at Talk:Omega_Point_(Tipler)#Disruptive_editing_by_Tim_Shuba.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fccbab90bd7a3f13
" indefinitely]] because it is suspected that he or she has used one or more accounts. (Account information: block log suspected sockpuppets confirmed socks "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fccc5d21f4000cfd
sorry for doing it twice a day, i will make sure i will do it only once a day in the future. dont threaten me you know what the outcome will be, if the outcome is what you think then you would have done it long time ago i said before that i have a very long breath, you can say that i am a as stubborn as Hamas. by the way soon i will add hamas figures regarding its own fatalities (less than 100) so get ready and if you keep removing hamas claims i will make sure all idf claims are removed also just give me time brother.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fccdf6873492bb2a
" Oppose because in my view, ""lead"" in the context of ""lead paragraph"" is unambiguous. (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcce8e5bd8581c2b
of divine revelation
0
0
0
0
0
0
fccfa4a4dfad7d55
Cover Someone upload the Basic cover, please! This is important, so hurry up!
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd0160e6136a7e7
Perhaps you can make it where it automatically wikilinks for the conference on the header. May want to have the stadiums and cities automatically wikilink too.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd14c6666a39225
" (shrugs) The tally is going 9-4 against any change, and half those who support any change do so only for Russia/Soviet Union. This isn't a situation for ""compromise."" A handful of people pushed for a change that went against the way things are done, in the hockey articles in particular and in sporting articles in general on Wikipedia. Consensus went solidly against them. The end. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd29f7b6c89f01d
RfC against Everyking I have filed an RfC against Everyking. Those concerned who have participated in this debate can certify it, while those who agree with my summary of the dispute may endorse it. If you've been involved in similar disputes (i.e. Autobiography promotion and publicity, La La (song)), feel free to add your own summary in the outside views section. You can endorse more than one summary, and still can certify the dispute. | Talk 19:07, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd356e6795d12af
Please stop adding nonsense to pages. It is considered vandalism, and is against wikipedia policy. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd4b33ee80ce57a
" It is part of a category system - every category named after a person has ""hidden"" parent categories from the subcats of Category:Wikipedia categories named after people, so you are misled when say that it is not part of a category system. It is incorrect to add other parent categories to a category named after a person because the articles within the category named after the person are not part of those parent categories. For instance, Barack Obama is indeed the President of the United States, but his family is not. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd740b0798b8510
" I have aspberger but i dnt act liek you do, dnt use it as a excuse (talk - contrib) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd83add806150ab
Thanks - you know everything! This is very helpful. (sticks and stones)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd8587cf9c36502
" Removing contentious information based on WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE concerns is never considered vandalism, especially when there is consensus to do so by multiple editors on noticeboards designed to handle such specific concerns. If you believe specific information should be restored it needs to be argued on a case by case basis and agreed upon prior to restoring. bons mots "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcd8fafb83b6016a
that is required for having their own article
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcda70fcb02196ce
erm, your gay... i dont appreciate you being a grumpy old twat and changing my posts, you dont own wikipedia so please fuck right off. LOVES XX
1
0
1
0
1
1
fcdd2570ab415e9c
" Dark Energy, Dark Matter, MOND and still more ""Critique of the Universe"" This goes to the whole question of the exclusive use of a single model of the universe that depends on the Friedmann equations and the FLRW metric. The consensus interpretation of the Lambda/cold dark matter model must clearly be flawed if it leads to the conclusion that the scientific method must be scrapped in order to save the model (ref). Dark Matter and Dark Energy are ad hoc ""add-ons"" that are trying to find theoretical justification. Dark Enegy, in particular, is being called a supernatural or ""unfalsifiable"" hypothesis because no experiment can possibly directly challenge it (ref), just like the existence of God hypothesis. Heretofore, all hypotheses must adhere to the scientific method (ref), ""the SM"". Now, in order to admit Dark Energy, cosmologists insist that SM must be tinkered with and an unfalsifiable hypothesis allowed for the first time in history. If we do this, the Pope can re-ascend to the Throne. All of the indirect ""overwhelming evidence"" for expansion rate acceleration and Dark Energy can be just as well applied to the concept that our inventory of matter and energy in our local universe is inadequate and that the mass of the global universe is at least 22.2 times as large as has been supposed (100%/4.5% = 22.2). The total mass of the universe has been and still is open to question. The Matter/Energy that we can inventory accounts for only 4.5% of the total needed to ""flatten"" the anisotropy pattern that is seen in the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation or ""CMB"" (ref). This proposed revision in the ""total mass"" and the General Relativity (GR) concept of the black hole hyperbolic field will save not only SM, but the Friedmann Equations and the FLRW metric themselves too!  The ""inflaton particle"" from which the universe may have sprung was the mother of all black-holes (MOAB). As such, it must have possessed an hyperbolic gravitational field that existed timelessly according to Alan Guth's quantum principles (ref). During the instant of inception of the differentiated universe that we can now detect, this hyperbolic field must have begun to degenerate. Space with time came into existence during this instant. The implication here of the prior existence of a sort of meta-universe is not explicitly acknowledged in any of the scenarios we read, but it is nonetheless an unstated assumption.  This space-time bubble's surface traveled up the MOAB's hyperbolic field gradient at a velocity hundreds or thousands of times the speed of light. This is Allan Guth's ""Inflation"". Matter/Light could keep pace with the inflation of space-time only as long as its temperature was several exponential decades of degrees Kelvin. As soon as Matter/Light began to condense and the fundamental forces began to differentiate, the inflation era ended (ref). The collapse of the infinite density hyperbolic field began. This hyperbolic field has been collapsing by means of a time-dependent process ever since. It is this ongoing transition from a hyperbolic black hole gravitational field to a parabolic Newtonian gravitational field underlying the global universe that is being mistaken for acceleration and Dark Energy (ref). This is not speculation. This is not my personal idea. This is but one example of a different logical meaning of Allan Guth's inflation theory (ref)and General Relativity according to Schwartzchild (ref) and many others. When guided by correct meta-logic, mathematical physicists will be able to validate this or some other theoretical interpretation of GR, the Friedmann equations and the FLRW metric. Then, with the demise of Dark Energy and Dark Matter, the scientific method will be saved (ref). Cosmologists are always wrong, but never in doubt. - Lev Landau (ref)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcddee613d8b1054
Picking on opinions you do not like is obscene I followed the discussion. The proposal to userfy all userboxes did not succeed, and in the meantime there is nothing ruling out political userboxes, not to speak of deleting them from the user space. Singling out someone you do not agree with like NicholasTurnbull does is just obscene, and as long as you do not delete all the userboxes - which I would be perfectly ok with - stop picking on mine.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcde58f571c96b44
" Your recent removal of ""environment-friendly"" from the page devoted to the nonsensical term Environmentally friendly This is about the most underhanded act that I have witnessed on Wikipedia, and I have been contributing since Wikipedia's beginning days. We know that, on the societal level, a so-called researcher or scientist involved in or acting as agent of tainting, skewing, concealing, and even destroying evidence in order to force a biased outcome is reprehensible and, to perform the very act on a world-stage in plain view, even certifiable. If I wanted to put the energy into moving or renaming the above-referenced page, I would be able to resource the adequate number of true academics motivated by their cerebrum and not their lowest-level neural tissue. However, I abandon my intention to do so with the satisfaction that your deviant and despicable act has evinced your true character. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcdebca48c01a983
You vandalized the Flavor of Love acticle. Stop.I'm Warning you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcdf5d299437f2a9
" Blocked Hi, I blocked you for 24 hours for being uncivil/personal attacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_state-named_Avenues_in_Washington%2C_D.C.&curid;=3819290&diff;=36367014&oldid;=36363898). If you disagree with this block, please contact me by email! Regards, eB "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce0dbedf2024918
His comments was to discuss redirecting articles to a deleted article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce31a372028c3c0
" Done, any better? The clock is ticking.... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce3278f331f089b
Update: I have amended the links in the articles so they link directly to this article once again. Ironically, the net effect of all the above is probably beneficial to the article anyway, with a bunch of redirects to take care of various spellings.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce3502ed4b8ae22
Presstv is also a terrible source, I suggest removing it
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce563ed2c99f7e6
there I added some sourced commentary from the singer himself.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce6f53411d86f8e
Reply I wrote an article and updated its inlinks as well as citation. But you put a speedy deltion note on it. Please check that article again WP:DELREV and guide me properly, thanks talk 9:59PM 14 May 2011
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce8f2842b88e25b
, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Sehend and Babakkhorramdin currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. This has nothing to do with the merits of the dispute, it has to do with cooperative editing. Dear Thanks for your message. I didn't start editing war. started it by forcing Persian script to Azeris. even we accept persian script, He added a word that is not grammatically correct in Azeri with Persian script. to solve it i added west Azerbaijan translation in Azeri in both Latin and persian scripts. i don't know why he thinks we should follow his idea to use Fazeri (a fake language which uses completely Persian words with one azeri verb at the end). For instance in Azeri similar to English adjective comes first followed by a noun. But in Farsi noun comes first. wanted to force Perisan words for west( غربی )and Azerbaijan(آذربایجان) and suggests using غربی آذربایجان. hence, we don't use غ as the first word in Azeri. 22:35
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce96d00a1bc2aac
" Christopher ""Ludacris"" Bridges still gets his lyrics mentioned. This is clearly inconsistent Dirty Souf favoritism/fandom, and bias in favor of more commercial, mainstream rappers. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fce9d3f9809815db
Do you really hate me?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fceae7cb2ea2da85
List of important publications in anthropology Hi Schrauwers, it has been requested by that List of important publications in anthropology be moved to Bibliography of anthropology. Your comments on this request are most welcome. Please see Talk:List of important publications in anthropology#Requested move. And thanks again for your work on Economic anthropology. Would you be interested in adding a section on economic anthropology as part of the list of important publications in anthropology?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fceb298afda3a4c5
"::Unlikely, not in main body, but such info could be justified in making up a section called Influences in modern culture or something. disc. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fceee883f69d8531
" Also...good use of fuck. As you noted, it's well tolerated on this page. Talk• Contributions "
1
0
1
0
0
0
fcf103bf4c7404fd
|attention= |peer-review= |old-peer-review= |image-needed= |needs-infobox=
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcf127fce8574233
" Problematic character analysis However, the Chinese characters of Qilin and both carry the Chinese ""deer"" radical , suggesting that they were conceived of as a deer like animal, or perhaps a kind of antelope. I have removed this unsourced sentence from the Origins section of the article, for the following reasons: As the lede states, the characters in qilin can also be written with the ""horse"" radical 馬 (maybe a more recent, less traditional variant, but this would have to be addressed, and sourced). The giraffe is also ""conceived of as a deer-like animal"" in Chinese, in fact even more explicitly than the qilin. The word for ""giraffe"", 长颈鹿, means ""long-necked deer"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcf1d8b8d185a3bb
" I never said they would be expelled. I said they do not meet the eligibility requirements to be a Scout. The only way an avowed homosexual can both understand and agree to live by the Scout Oath and Law is to lie. Of course, he is also violating his promise to be Trustworthy in the process. He does not meet the eligibility requirements to be a Scout. He intentionally violates the Scout Oath and Law, and he intents to continue violating the Scout Oath and Law. But he could join and remain in Scouting nonetheless, by telling lies. I imagine, at any given time, there are thousands of Scouts who are regularly violating the Scout Oath and Law, who intend to continue doing so, and still remain in Scouts. But that doesn't change the fact the Scout Oath is what it is, that BSA believes that homosexual behavior violates the Scout Oath, and that these Scouts are not qualified to be Scouts. ""the First Amendment simply does not require that every member of a group agree on every issue in order for the group's policy to be 'expressive association'."" ""the courts may not interfere on the ground that they view a particular expression as unwise or irrational"" and ""beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others to merit First Amendment protection"" The fact that many Scouts disagree with BSA beliefs, ignore BSA beliefs, disobey BSA beliefs, or that anyone finds BSA beliefs to be inconsistent, irrational, or unwise, does not take away BSA's right to assert and hold their beliefs.( )"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcf25c3563b8c1c4
Lazy layabouts Want to live without working, expect debt cancellation.
1
0
0
0
1
0
fcf355a90586728c
" Article This article is a ""circus"", every day it changes. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcf70ae3d98aa005
I'm sorry about the urgency, but, as I explained, it wasn't more urgent than removing my posts. I agree with you about the wristband not being part of shiatsu, and therefore that source is not valid for shiatsu, and I'm sorry to have included it. However, if we are going to be clear about words, acupressure does not exist, since the meaning of the word is needle pressure, so unless you are pressing with needles, the word is used incorrectly. Almost everyone has agreed that the word is used for pressure on acupuncture points. So I believe that, when a source mentions acupressure massage, it could be used for shiatsu, since shiatsu, in part at least, presses acupuncture points. By the way, it would be very pleasant if you checked all the other references in the article with the same scrutiny that you have done with mine.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcf9e21516adf972
You can't have it both ways. Either sarcasm is wrong when either of you do it, which I believe, or it's only wrong when one side does it. If you're going to stop, I'll deal with others. If you're not, I'm going to focus on you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fcfaaece24d89286
" THE BOSTON RED SOX ""The Red Sox are the greatest team in baseball."" -Fattyjwoods ""The New York Yankees are the worst team and baseball their uniforms are gay, I mean pinstripes!?!? What a gay uniform!"" -Fattyjwoods"
1
0
0
0
1
1
fcff00804afbd8ce
eraseing comments on other peoples talk page eraseing comments on other peoples talk page is not kindly looked upon you should not be deleting things in DBZRocks talk page that should be left to DBZRocks. Furthur actions will be sent to the administrators. This is your final warning.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd043ea652aeec24
This is completely ridiculous. The extent to which Google is viewed as an authority here is threatening to make Wikipedia simply a rehash of topics indexed in Google. 19:31, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd069914bc0db67a
" That or ""they shagged, baby"" ;-) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd06e41fca5c9ca2
Hermoine Rose,related to Guy Rose? Is Hermoine Rose a relative of Guy Rose? We have an oil painting of a famous cliff at Laguna Beach by Hermoine Rose.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd084bb24cb22e6f
You are contradicting yourself: It can be inferred from your statements that you consent to having all references to human beings removed from the Planetary Habitability Article. 24.77.204.120
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd08babee1f3a7a0
" Counterpoint Dear Jerome, ""And"" is the appropriate conjunction because it implies no relationship between harmony, rhythm, and color, which are not inherently related. ""But"" is inappropriate because it falsely implies that harmony, rhythm, and color cannot differ without contradiction, and ""yet"" is inappropriate because it implies that readers would expect a contradiction where they would expect none. Also, compromising between a correct and incorrect application of grammar's figuratively black-or-white rules commits the Golden Mean Fallacy. -Duxwing PS I know that I may sound arrogant or bitter. I am neither. )"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd097d28dcdfab21
anal butter with cream anus
1
0
1
0
0
0
fd09be0e19670793
User:Larrypooplinson Hello. I noticed your indef-block notification at User talk:Larryfuckstylinson regarding a vandalism-only account and username policy violation. May I ask you to also have a look at User talk:Larrypooplinson? It seems to have the same issues and to be a probable sock. —
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd0a5d89baee27ca
Villa Molin I've just done this: rather more your territory, Giano. Any raw gaffes?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd0a5f41f5b0daa1
$250 million including its gray economy its would be
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd0b101b42325670
"*****When in the same sentence something is asserted to be a democracy (and yes, I am aware of the ""not a democracy"" statement, which applies to a different aspect of Wikipedia), yet denies the right to count each vote equally, it only means there is something fundamentally wrong with voting as a method utilized to achieve consensus, but not with the rights of individuals per se (in a real world democracy, everybody's vote is counted equally, that of a Harvard graduate and of an elementary school dropout). This is exactly why some wikipedians strongly discourage use of polls for problem resolution, but since voting is employed here, let's at least try treating it as democratic and not make up rules as we go along.— "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd0c6d0917ceb386
I was testing nothing. What the hell are you talking about? Oh, and please leave your name instead of just adding a template to my page. Thanks! !
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd0fd2f9717e6b72
Well the Irish Government send a message of condolence for Hitler, so I suppose they have a precedence for this sort of thing.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd11a0370726f2f5
(I still can't see the signature - are you sure it was added? Wikipedia's been acting a bit wonky lately) What is sandwich vandalism? Inserting the word sandwich? Also, with images, have you considered uploading to wikimedia commons rather than to English-language wikipedia, so that it can be used in any wikipedia? Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd11db4abc6f0f75
" name origin disappointing ;) Okay so the article mentions the *real* story behind the name. Kinda boring, really. Considering I thought it was due to a line from the ""Three Stooges"" ""we need quiet, not a riot"". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_Haters#Quotes 199.214.26.41 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd12ba400215d097
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Trivial (mathematics). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd12f8b7fe7711de
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -''''''004
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd18a6fcd3e2e7f6
Then what the Hell do you call what Bryan did Friday night? Good grief, are you guys that dense not to understand what he announced in that promo? Or is it simply that you don't want a 192-pound Vegan with no personality and miles of wrestling experience on the Wrestlemania XXVIII card, or even in WWE when Mania XXVIII occurs?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd190e4d0bdc1a64
The rightmost graph is public domain. The leftmost is not. For all practical purposes, they are identical. The license of the leftmost graph is also not compatible with the text. The graph requires it to be used for non-commercial purposes, but the text can be used for commercial purposes. Therefore, if someone wanted to sell this (dunno why), they would have to strip out the most important image in the article. Also, I'm not sure what DF has done to the graph to claim some sort of copyright on it, but that's neither here nor there. Further, the rightmost graph presents more information without adding clutter. The fact that it's been used before is not an argument to keep it. It is inferior to the rightmost graph. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd1b7fc7ec35ea8b
" The idea that one can distinguish the 'thesis' and 'theory' of intelligent design is puzzling. While I don't have access to Jones' Encyclopedia of Religion, there's an entry from 2003 (listed as 'forthcoming') on Dembski's list of writings on ID. Note that this is pre-Kitzmiller, and is typical of Dembski's writings of the time - Sagan, Paley and Kant. Assuming that this is substantially similar to the final version, there's nothing about thesis vs. theory. Beyond this, John Carter appears to misunderstand the idea of ""theory"". There are I think perhaps several other areas of what might be called ""theoretical biology,"" such as parts of astrobiology, which also have a total lack of any hard evidence to indicate that they even have something real to study, in that case alien life. No. That's not what theoretical biology is. Take a look at the TOC of the Journal of Theoretical Biology. Or try Acta Biotheoretica. Or even check out the journal Astrobiology. Theory isn't about ""things that lack total evidence"". This entire section about 'thesis' vs. 'theory' of intelligent design appears to be based on both a misunderstanding of what Dembski was saying (pre-Kitzmiller, when he was predicting the overthrow of ""materialistic"" science and a department of ID at a major university within a decade) and a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference of what constitutes theoretical biology, and how it differs from unfounded speculation and science fiction. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd21961769786312
"No done}} I removed this for a moment. On more careful reading, the source does say ""Russian-made"" and the content in the article clearly qualifies that the information is on behalf of the Ukrainian position. Speculation on our behalves contravenes Wikipedia policy (WP:OR). Nevertheless, thanks"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd28a665e047ce13
" ""wikipedia isn't perfect, but its model is sound"" Can I suggest that you two guys read Professor John Naughton's excellent article in ""THE OBSERVER"" of 10.08.14? If it helps you understand it, I can get it translated into Belgian (French or Walloon?) and into Dutch? I use both Wikipedia and ODNB and both are equally 'intransigent': ""unwilling or refusing to change one's views or to agree about something. synonyms: uncompromising, inflexible, unbending, unyielding, diehard, unshakable, unwavering, resolute, rigid, unaccommodating, uncooperative, stubborn, obstinate, obdurate, pigheaded, single-minded, iron-willed, stiff-necked""; intransigeant; onverzettelijk: in French/Dutch? I CAN DEBATE THE SHORTCOMINGS OF WIKIPEDIA UNTIL (AS WE SAY IN COLLOQUIAL ENGLISH) ""THE COWS COME HOME"", BUT THERE IS NO COMPLETE AGREEMENT ANYWHERE IN THE ACADEMIC WORLD AS TO WHO EXACTLY CONSTITUTED THE BLOOMSBURY GROUP, SO ALL THE MEMBERS ARE A MATTER OF OPINION AND NOT FACT GUYS. WHAT IS CERTAIN IS THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF MALE MEMBERS WERE CAMBRIDGE APOSTLES. Understand the above points and we may have the basis for further discussion? Otherwise....2.27.131.74 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd28ed97a1570922
" The Countess / Elizabeth An editor(s) keep adding a hyphen to The Countess' name (i.e. Elizabeth - The Countess), when the proper grammar is obviously, ""Elizabeth / The Countess"". The slash is proper. I'm sure this won't do a bit of good, but I'm putting forward the effort. Thank you to all who have fought the good grammar fight. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd29f8cbe4cf1378
&oldid;=624092354 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject desk/Interviews2
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd2b852e4b001bf8
Yeah you made a mistake undo it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd2c0df172f5af8d
Do not add more material without citations Particularly to the Notable autodidacts section. If I see it, I will be forced to delete it for lack of evidence. If it is a famous and well-known autodidact like Ramanujan, then I might try to add a reference myself; but otherwise, no. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd2da444b113dc77
" Removal of ""tags"" I will remove the ""tags"" because: ""Clean up"" - Neither I nor (until now) anybody else (also not the user that put in the tags) has had any idee what kind of ""Clean up"" is required! ""Lead section"" - There is and has always been a ""lead section"" what also is recognized by the automatic software function! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd2de6bc0ceeb3d9
) 12:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd35f5d8c1556e56
" It all depends on what you call free energy and what you call suppression. IMHO there are so many different free energy machines it's just hilarious. Knowing that makes the reason for suppressing them down all to obvious. If some one is getting stalked then you just take their word for it. The main criticism of the theory is that these devices are absent in the market because they do not and cannot work. Here the excuse to ignore it is the ignorance it self. The tool of suppression is the argument the devices don't exist, but this is also the excuse for never looking at them at the same time. We cant have it both ways? Either the machines don't work or the theory is wrong. We cant assume the machines must work because the theory has to be wrong just like we cant assume the theory must be right because the machines cant work. Most people will continue not believing it's real even after being confronted with such device. They will stand there screaming about the laws of thermodynamics. People like the inventors twin brother, or their wife. Not very likely to convince a wikipedian if you cant convince your wife now it is? The suppression is not so much executed by special interest groups as by the mainstream dogma. The dogma is however much supported by the special interests. Signs of real professional free energy suppression you can see here on wikipedia. Every actor in history is worthy of his own page but weird inventions not confirmed by mainstream science (working or not is irrelevant) apparently cant have a page here. The few free energy machines still having their own wikipedia page are full of rant how crackpots try to destroy the laws of thermodynamics and how nutterish they are, not your usual trolling but the work of experts. Take the introduction of the Water fuel cell. ""the source of this addition energy has not been scientifically identified therefore the theory is treated with skepticism."" There was barely any theory, it just worked! And it has not been investigated. The way it's treated is not worthy of being in the description. An encyclopedia should not instruct it's readers behaviour? Tell me how to treat things huh? ""such a practice conforms to the parameters of perpetual motion, hence conclusive scientific investigation would either verify violation of thermodynamic law or identify the source of claimed additional energy."" But if there isn't going to be any scientific analysis - ever! then the laws of thermodynamics are nonsense. If the best scientists can do is preach the laws then it's just not very likely they are right about the topic. Then it says: ""At least one car prototype, reportedly powered by a water fuel cell, has been assembled."" HUH what? but but but?? You know what I mean? ""Meyer's claims about the Water Fuel Cell and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996."" His wiki use to say http://web.archive.org/web/20050106215257/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer ""It failed to work during a required demonstration of the water-fueled car. An Ohio court found Stanley Meyer guilty of fraud in a case brought against him by disgruntled investors."" So he was scammed by his own investors. What kind of person would do that with a known to work invention? And why was this important information deleted? Then it says: Stanley Meyer was granted patents in the United States and abroad starting in 1989. The verifiability, and scientific basis, of the patents are controversial. Now I know the water motor patents where granted after a working model was displayed. You can see it in the application number. There is no other way to get a patent on an electrolysis cell. Because of those laws of thermodynamics you know? You do know about those right? You can see free energy suppression live at work when you see that the world famous American inventor Stanley Meyer was not worthy of his own wikipedia page. It's obvious he cant have a page because that would violate conservation of energy right? Paul Pantone does have his own page where again the working of his device is denied by no-witness, The GEET page however describes a Hindi film? BTW Paul was also scammed by his investors? ha-ha? Yull Brown is also not worthy of his own page? Makes it kind of hard to write about free energy suppression when the suppressed and murdered inventors are not allowed the light of day? What about William A. Rhodes? Dennis klein then? no? Isaac de Rivaz? Daniel Dingle? etc etc?? At least we still have the Oxyhydrogen page right? haha? This is how free energy suppression is done. I would love to make a page for each one of them with most credible references but it's just not going to be allowed. The wall of propaganda is much to thick. I can think of better ways to kill myself. ha-ha ''here. I'll also take the opportunity to remind you that we a
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd3794aa4c52fe0e
Good luck on Sarah Palin Watch out for Gwen Gale, she is a snake who thinks she is a goddess of mercy, and so is KillerChihuaha, they are both better than Joe-something, an arrogant tool who came in at the end. I have never come across a WP admin who was worth allowing to have a signature, so no help there unfortunately. Here are some links to sources I hope will help you. 'Rape kits' material. There is every piece of documentation here to show either negligence or intent. Shoved off the page by brute force including mr.joe admin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HB 270. The bill in question on the kits billing issue 10 11 This one never hit the page. Probably the best material. Years before Palin was even mayor, she and others bought their way ($5 apiece) onto the lowest board of the local hospital, which elects the next highest board, which elects the highest board. Palin and others ended up at the top, and voted to stop abortions in the hospital and embezzled $thousands on local anti-abortion charities. Pretty good value for money. Took the AK supreme court to stop them. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Links to gun activists & AK separatists 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 AK state legislature: primary sources, so be prepared to defend that. There are primaries there already, like the link to her duties as mayor. [http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_minutes.asp?chamb=B&date1;=010181&date2;=12018
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd381bf498a538ac
Avi, I know you are well intentioned, but I am not following the logic. Should it not count as a human rights issue because it is only 70 people? How many people is it acceptable to lock away for profit in mental hospitals? But more to the point, according to the sources I have found it is considered relevant to Human Rights in Israel. The number of people mistreated in other countries doesn't really nullify mistreatment in Israel. Nor do our own viewpoints on this.. as we are documenting these points through verifiable sources.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd38c2a5a9f982f1
2007 (UTC) Is there a way to bring the old article back to improve it? I've saved many articles from deletion and it's too bad I didn't get the chance with this one. I didn't know it was up for deletion. 23:11, 31 July
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd3918336ee3c9ff
Richard Machowicz Can you please see this discussion? I am trying to find out: why is it invalid to reference the shows if a podcast is lacking, when it would not be if there was a podcast? Are there similar rules for referencing out of print books?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd391ce8e2863f41
Updating biographical information of self Hi Wikipedians. If anyone is interested I have been updating my own biography, which had fallen a little out of date. For example a new edition of one of the published works mentioned was published on 9 June 2013. It is not a commercial publication, therfore I posit I am not adding information about the revised edition for personal commercial gain. The book is a community environmental resource. I hope my material on myself is transparent, balanced, and written according to Wikipedia guidelines despite my obvious conflict of interest. The Wikimedia community here in Brisbane, Queensland, is not very active at the moment (I am a member of Wikimedia Australia) and all the editors I know I haven't been in contact for some time and I suspect they haven't the time to look at the page and update it. On balance, I believe it is better to update the page myself to reflect true facts than leave it out of date. I would welcome any copmments, suggestions or feedback on this matter.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd3a7f8cb9465890
Zzuuzz is a neo nazi.
1
0
0
0
0
0
fd3d492e7a3ca27c
them both. That was just
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd3e30a7ac1da8fb
" Proposal to Delete this article. Notice how the only people who use this word are white or work for the white media? (I'm white, btw, but this wikipedia and I'm a volunteer). Someone that is Islamic, like one of the countless Muslim genius's like Averroes or Avicenna or al-Khwarizmi, would not describe their work as ""Islamist"". When Muhammad Ali didn't want to fight against Vietnam, his pacifism wasn't Islamist. Sure, a true Muslim would not have supported or joined in the American war on Vietnam, but that is not called Islamism. Rather, Islamism is a word invented by racists and imperialists and is a form of Orientalism (book. I hereby nominate this page for deletion. I'll be back. 27 July, 2014"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd413a09d87bc32b
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bounded weak echo region. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd41535ad332d1e2
REDIRECT Talk:Sherwood E-ACT Academy
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd42d24686de0bc0
In fact, there appears to be only one article about a single lawsuit (maybe multiple filings), and 6 links to other court cases. This is simply original research and all court cases should be removed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fd444b6e6e5d25f3
The 'arguments' above consist of reiteration. I also disagree that there are significant differences between anime and animation; certainly the latter covers a far wider stylistic range and anime could be described as a subset derived from the development of particular forms of mass production (which are also found in animation from other countries, whether the USA, Korea, or anywhere else making significant amounts for the mass market); this definition would exclude Miyazaki (who, indeed, excludes himself, unlike his western fans). Likewise men in monster suits and miniature work are hardly unique to a particular national tradition. Yes, the Ultraman tradition represents as much of a speciality as Marvel/DC superheroes, and certainly deserves a specific article, but this is not the same as Tokusatu. Ergo, Tokusatu is not a genre. should not be so quick to assume what people do and don't know about; my original comment may have been sharp but was in response to an I-will-not-be-questioned tone, and I certainly know enough to contribute to this article. However, I strongly disagree with the classification and crufty tone and thus won't. Usage on the Japanese wikipedia does not have any bearing. The large number of separate articles on Japan-related topics that could well be included under the more general headings is definitely a fan-driven form of exceptionalism.
0
0
0
0
0
0