Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
fdd76a05f67353fd
" Agreed.Coldplay Expért Let's talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdd9d6c180b4d2f6
]]) 13:45, 15 January 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
fddb44f21e9a90fa
I also agree it seams odd having to pages for what is essentially the same topic
0
0
0
0
0
0
fddbb82344f3d7a1
I am demanding to speak to someone of the highest authority, anyone who has a proper look at this history will see that I tried to solve the matter via discussion, gave in to the other editor on other things, the other editor has been personal attacking, page owning, edit warring, not assuming good faith and yet he has not been blocked speak to Ritchie333 he is an editor who has been trying to solve the problem out all day and he will tell you fairly, he has the right to comment as he was involved from an outside point of view.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fddc3fa56d9f270b
" OK, we can use ""In some color spaces, the primary colors used are not real colors, in the sense that they cannot be generated with any light spectrum."" And please use spaces after your periods and commas to make your text more normal and readable. I'm not sure what you're saying about ""stimulus and reaction"", or in what sense tristimulus values are ""unsuitable""; they are a quite different from an HSV description; nonlinearly related; does that mean ""unsuitable""? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fddec5ab15546ee2
Hi, Benne. Thank you for unearthing this need for disambiguation. I think that Mansura is usually spelled with a ta marbuta as its final letter: منصورة (manṣūrä). This comes frot the root نصر (naṣara) meaning 'help' or 'make victorious' (interestingly, in derived form II it means 'Christianize'). Therefore, منصور (manṣūr) means 'helped', 'supported', 'victorious'. The place name is the feminine version of this, perhaps representing the old accusative (with locative meaning). In Arabic, many place names begin with the definite article. Sometimes the article is kept in trasliteration and sometimes it isn't. Sometimes it's transliterated as Al and sometimes it's El. The word itself could be transliterated as Mansura, Mansoura, Mansoora, Mansurah, Mansourah, Mansoorah, Mansureh, Mansoureh, Mansooreh. It would make sense to have all of these alternatives, with and without alternatives of definite article, linking to a disambiguation page. However, the Egyptian Mansurah is by far the most important of these, so it might take precedence over the disambig. I'll see if I can tidy it up a little. —
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde049eedb0f16cc
Is it not possible to accept that the merge argument was lost. Oppose them and now. Too soon for another discussion. Stop wasting valuable energy and be constructive.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde13f8d26c13169
Where did I say the seminary was non-notable? I said it wasn't a significant enough post for the job holder to be inherently notable. Arguments to the contrary need some form of policy basis so please feel free to provide that. As for the sources if they were present during the discussion and the neither the keep or delete side found them notable enough to discuss specifically then I don't think I can disregard the discussion and form my own opinion of the sources. There is plenty of evidence in the discussion of the sources being thoroughly reviewed. Humbug!
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde1421779c745ab
Wikipedia:Main Page FAQ#Why doesn't the cursor appear in the search box, like with Google?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde1e93a80179961
I've raised the matter to the administrators. It's up to them to decide in this case. You have been flamebaiting and I have no time or desire for it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde4a5da8bea266e
Hello! You are right, Qanci is correct, I havent seen that page. The article is now back to the old title. Thanks for informing! ) – Talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde5b973d9b258be
" Speedy deletion of ""Thanjavur Thiagarajan"" A page you created, Thanjavur Thiagarajan, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular. You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde79cde41ee5961
Hadn't seen your post on the Irish People talk page before I wrote above. Agree, that's a good idea putting a 3rd tier into the collage.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde8651365fd6aeb
The Provisional IRA and the Continuity IRA were previously designated as 'Other Terrorist Groups' by the US authorities. This was deleted following the peace process in Northern Ireland. The Real IRA however have been designated a 'terrorist organisation' since their split with the PIRA in 1998.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fde9a7776f78ba9e
" Evacuation and flight to areas within Nazi Germany The section ""Evacuation and flight to areas within Nazi Germany"" limits the evacuation to the end of the war. In fact evacuation of Black See Germans started in 1943, rather in the ""middle of the war"". The section should be rewritten. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdea39f53ad4d1cf
Notice|Threads older than five days are archived by .}} {{
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdeaa0421d418f8b
Authors who did efforts
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdebba38fe94687e
It's called historiography which is how professional historians document the history of history. There is no single right point of view that we can neutrally document, there are lots of them. For an outline of the actual events see the history of Rome articles. Any reader who comes up with their own original theory on why Rome fell I have a lot of respect for.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdebd82e9d150c67
Thanks! =D More silliness, more silliness... Maybe if I bounce around a little... boing, boing, BOING, boing, boing, BOING
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdec3ce765727359
I do not know if Sfahey is a sock puppet of yours or not, it really does not matter. You have deleted cited reference material. Frankly, you're far more destructive in that manner than I, since you did in about 22 cites. I knew you couldn't resist responding with hostile activity, since you've been stalking ISP addresses 129.133.124.199 and 159.247.3.210 since the first of the year. If you can't curb your aggression, why don't you consider therapy? Your content is wrong, and the game you are playing is borderline psychotic.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdec8d00c49145e3
Nvrmnd. Late to the part again I guess )
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdecff28c9899848
if you rreally want to beat TawkerBot to the vandalism you should look into either WP:VandalProof, or WP:POP, besides, tawkerbot, and all it's second and third cousins only revert blankings, vandalism that doesn't remove large chunks of content, still require manual reverts
0
0
0
0
0
0
fded8c29262abdca
" Kingdom of Great Britain ""Kingdom of Great Britain""? Where did this term originate? I'll wager it didn't originate in Great Britain! Please supply evidential support or rename it ""Great Britain""."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdee09deaa693a40
Maximum Score Max score is 1575. That is the max of 375 plus 1200 for the 12 additional Yahtzee's. The lower score would not be reduced (for failing to get Full House, Sm Straight and Lg Straight) because you would use the last Yahtzees as wild cards in the lower section after filling in the top section.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdefc3bb9e6c09cf
, about a street elephant named Pang Dao
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf17143f0cafe44
US English or would you prefer fries?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf2e614da9707f3
"== Thanks == Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. I appreciate your vigilance. Siobhan Hansa Me too! WP:AIV Just FYI, this user was reported in entirely the wrong place (in the hidden comment section), and therefore it not only went unnoticed for more than 24 hours, but also caused a bot to malfunction. Please follow directions when reporting users on AIV, and make sure they go in the proper location next time. Preview is also not a bad idea either. Thanks (ptt) THX for revert Hello! THX a lot for revert of my User page. I was away so I didn't see it. One more time Thanks template:grammar1 Thank you for improving . Shortly after I created it, I had second thoughts if it's even helpful and thought about nominating it for deletion. Do you use this template? — Going commando Why are you removing my edit from the Going commando post ? I do think of it as useful, since it is one of the most well-known examples of someone who was going commando. Grtz. I understand you wish to discourage edits that are purely between British and American spelling, but in British usage ""practise"" is a verb and ""practice"" is a noun. I think this may be a useful distinction. My RfA Thank you for your support in my recent RfA. I think valid criticisms were raised in areas that I need to work on, so I've withdrawn my name. I intend to work on addressing the concerns that were raised, and think I need to work contributing without allowing myself to become as stressed as I have been at times, which did result in some inappropriate behavior. Perhaps I may re-explore adminship at some point in the future, but it's a little early to consider that. Again, thank you. Thagomizer What I can't figure out is why that other guy keeps deleting it. Links I had added links in bangla cinema since us Bengalis also like to watch hindi movies. MovieDesi has the rights to several movies and songs and clips as well as other bollywood information that would be of interest to easter/middelEastern and even other readers who would like to get a feel of bollywood, and indian cinema; since the bengali cluture and language are quite similar. Thanks Thanks for helping revert vandalism on the Komodo Dragon article. However, you may want to tell the vandal in question with warning templates on their talk page. Just a suggestion. 15 Strength training Hi, You removed a bunch of text from the strength training article (the 'common concerns' section). I reverted your edit, and this is to let you know why. You said in your edit summary ""deleting copyvio from http://www.tranquillizer.co.uk/weight-training-concerns.html"" - if you look at that page, you can see at the end of some statements, there are numbers thus ""[17]"". The tranquillizer site actually copied the information from wikipedia, not the other way around. Its not a copyvio from us, it's a copy vio from them. Just a head's up. Sounds like you think the section's biggest problem is the tone of the section rather than the section itself. I'd agree with that, I'll try for a re-write if I have time in the near future. Stained glass Thank you for keeping your eye on Stained glass. I get so tired of the vandalism... I've also worked on Leonardo da Vinci, which is semi-protected, and I swear that kids get themselves accounts specifically so they can vandalise it. It's nice to see someone else watchi
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf3510b16860b29
Guettarda. I have a question for you. I won't diss you again. And I didn't mean to diss you in the first place. But tell me this? Who first contacted YOU SPECIFICLY to deal with me. Because whoever it was doesn't respect you man. These blokes who want to maintain their ideology no matter what it takes are playing games. They get a righteous man. They get someone based on that man's character. They specifically select you based on your fine character, to come to CLASH with me. But I don't think they are showing you any respect man. Not by a long shot. Who contacted you to intervene in this dispute first. That man. He is a man who does not respect you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf398372e9c60dd
I can't speak for Jimbo, but if I were in his position I would consider it an obligation to enforce the integrity of wikipedia in extreme cases like this, in spite of any disproportionate controversy that may possibly result from my actions. This seemed like a clear cut case of administrator abuse to me (I'm a centrist; no bias accusations please). Most of the small handful of people who know about this controversy will forget about it within a week or month. The article, on the other hand, would be lost forever; the knowledge therein stolen from innumerable potential readers. Think of the bigger picture, and moreover, consider these overreactions and what they implicate.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf4e44e9de757f7
Okay Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf5a22339925b6d
" Merry Christmas!! MERRY CHRISTMAS, ! Hope it's a wonderful one! (happy New Year, too!)Girl♪ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdf86da4b89588a3
OMG I AM OBSSESSED WITH TWILIGHT AND IT IS MY HEAD I HAVE ALL THE BOOKS AND MOVIES I HAVE ALL THE POSTERS AND MERCHANDISE I HAVE 1874 PICS ON MY COMPUTER AND MEMORY STICK I GO ON MY COMPUTER EVERY DAY AND LOOK AT TWILIGHT SITES I ONLY READ TWILIGHT BOOKS AND MUCH MUCH MORE !!!! XXXXXXXX P.S. I AM TEAM EDWARD ALL THE WAY XXXXXXX
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdfa7a523c5e0e44
Questionable Block I came across an account you blocked indef. which only made 4 constructive edits to a Neelix article. While there is an evident COI, that is not a reason for an automatic block. I'm not sure how you came to that decision.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdfba88123c566e6
" ""Wehtmacht directly fought against the uprisers"", and berlingowcy fought directly against Wehtmacht troops, therefore, they were belligenents, although, as you correctly pointed, not the participants of the uprising. Berlingovcy participated in the hostilities directly related to the uprising, they are listed among casualties (about a quarter of total casualties). Obviously, they must be among the belligerents, and Berling must be in the commander's list. In my opinion, division of the Poles onto first sort and second sort'' Poles is unacceptable. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdfd262a9a7bb6cd
hi Cristiano Ronaldo, I know you play for Man. United, but I mean you don't deserve to be treated like that so why don't you go play for one of the teams in Portugal. At least you will be treated the way you should be. I may not be portugese (I'm american),but my whole family was born in Portugal except for me and my cousins, but we speak portuguese. Anyway I'm a big fan of Benifica and Portugal. I don't care for the american teams or when America plays cause all I want for Portugal to win.You should play for Benifica, maybe they might be champs if you play for there team.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fdfd558c6a3d718a
loves the caulk, she does
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe009fb7feaca81a
"but not your custom version. Adding the code importScript('User:UncleGiggo/test.js'); to that page and clearing the cache should do the trick. If that still doesn't work quite right, try asking (t//c) Still not working...Can anyone else try to help please? As said, please contact I think I've fixed it. -) —[[' | talk]] (←) Did you purge the cache? —[[' | talk''''']] "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe02cef3c6eb3a9b
Why is an article about a Greek Orthodox theological subject being dominated by an Roman Catholic editor? Why is Esoglou making very disproportionate (at best) Roman Catholic additions to this article? Why is an article about a Greek philosophy and a Greek Orthodox concept (as it is used exclusively in the present) being dominated by the editor Esoglou? Why are there recent very long additions about people like Augustine whom in their writing never used the word (because Augustine could not speak nor read Greek). Being added to an article about the very essential difference between Roman Catholic and Orthodox theologies as specifically noted by scholars of Greek Orthodox theology? Why is Esoglou engaging in rewriting this article to say a concept that is almost exclusive spoken of in Greek? Why to an article about a theological concept so important to Greek Orthodox Theology that is mentioned by Greek Orthodox theologians in that way. Why is the actual text for the Roman Catholic church now equal to or more that the Eastern Orthodox? Even though the concept is not spoken of by the RC church per se? Why or what evidence is there to believe (outside of what anecdotal evidence Esoglou added) that theoria is now somehow something so Roman Catholic embraces in the way the Eastern Orthodox do? Why is Esoglou using this concept's article to ATTACK Greek theologians (John Romanides)? Why is it Esoglou could not make his edits to the article Contemplation instead? Since he uses the excuse that the term Contemplation is the same as theoria even though that is so vague as to miss the entire point of why Greek Orthodox theologians such as John S Romanides and Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos use the term theoria instead of contemplation. *Why is it that it appears that Esoglou's edits confuse the whole point of the article and I can not find any Roman Catholic sources let alone encyclopedia and scholarly sources that treat this subject the way Esoglou has rewritten the article? Why would it not seem that it is in Esoglou's best interest to discredit this theological subject because it contradicts his narrative that there is no fundamental difference between the Eastern Orthodox church and the Roman Catholic church. Why is it as the article is the specific difference it not to be believed that Esoglou is not POV pushing after he wrote this sentence in the article TODAY.. Contrary to what Romanides said, it is Roman Catholic teaching that God loves all, even those who choose against him, such as the devil. Why is in Esoglou's POV interest to either make the article incoherent, discredit the Orthodox theologians in the article or poison the well and have the article deleted wholesale? Why (if anyone spends the time to read what has been said on this article talkpage) it is not clear that Esoglou's behavior has tried all of these things and is actively now ruining the article and running contributors off of the article as his recent reverting and rewriting of the contributions made by User:Timothy.lucas.jaeger show. Why does the article not reflection how this concept is being used and presented by Greek theologians but is now peppered with Esoglou's anecdotal original research? His speculation, opinions and interpretations? Why is allowed to do this to various wikipedia articles without even once being banned for an hour let alone 24 hours? LoveMonkey
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe03a87bf57cef8a
Only Durzis call themselves as unitarians (Muwahhideen) in order to define/strengthen this Tawhid belief, the other even sects does not need this term.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe047bba23d9c4f6
I created an archive page for you. See above. Just cut and paste what you want to into the new page. Others more sophisticated than me can tell you how to archive stuff automatically, but if you want to select what to archive manually, you are all set up.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe05be5f12a0a4c4
the relationship with
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe07308c0fd76488
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Timeline of evolution. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe087c9603d205a7
Kurfürst's edits Today Kurfürst embarked in a huge rewritting of the article. While some of his changes are improvement many others are clear POV pushing to make the Bf 109 better than it was. I'm therefore forced to revert his changes and ask him to innitiate discussion on the talk page before the changes.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe08a90d2fbd62ba
Gobby Is there a special reason why Gobby is not part of this list? For me it is a valuable editor, since it is (as far as I knew before reading this page) the only cross-platform collaborative text editor (SubEthaEdit is good, but sometimes we have to take notice of those not-mac-users). I seem to remember that Gobby was on this page earlier. .
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe09017bcd09ea09
" I'm BUMED !!!!!!!!!!! Danny, I'M PISSED, that your NOT on Adam Crolla show any longer. I feel that the ""AC show"" is slipping away now that your gone! Will we be seeing/hearing from you anytime soon? Hang in there Bud...teddy [email protected] If you know someone that can use PC help, checkout my two sites out: http://techurls.tripod.com/ < for PC Help http://elecurls.tripod.com/ < for wan'na-bee Hobbyist or Engineers This site is somewhat new, so few links; but I have hundreds of links to add... I live in Fairfield, CA (45 miles from Sac., CA) l8r -teddy"
1
0
0
0
0
0
fe09970ae54028db
" Remember how viruses work: They are merely little bits of genetic material that ""hijack"" the host cell's mechanisms and cause the host cell to start cranking out many, many new copies of the virus. Eventually, the host cell bursts, releasing all the new virions (virus particles) to go infect new hosts. It's simply this rupturing of the host cell's membrane that kills it, and it's pretty-much the same story with any virus, from good old cold viruses (rhinoviruses) to HIV. 11:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0a5755b7637062
" Stop telling me to ""assume good faith"" - im furious with you, how can i assume good faith when i dont agree with you??? That article is within the same boundaries as ANY article on a fictional character of a soap or series and can only be worked on as the character progresses in time - thats how it works. And it's not me choosing to ignore the guidelines. As a mod that's your job because in my experiance of Wikipedia, its the mods who break the rules more than the average user, especially if they don't get there own way! And for the record, i will be making my feelings on this clear when i put in an officialy complaint. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0a9c5f44da43c2
Well is guess wikipedia is now liable pursuant to EU laws so we will soon now who you are, you cant hide behide wiki
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0b0e6b9c0f58a8
" Career The reference provided for the first sentence does not actually make any mention of anything in this sentence at all. All that I can find on this page to do with Odubade is that he left in 2004–05. Another mention of ""netted"" without explanation (see comment in Lead section). Reference 8: ""Reserves too good for The Gas"" redirects to a general mobile news page which makes no mention of anything to do with Odubade. ""He scored his last goal of the season in Eastbourne's 3–0 away win against Cambridge City in the play-off, but was also in the side that lost 2–1 to Altrincham in the final."" – the ""but"" in this sentence doesn't make much sense. Maybe consider changing to an 'and', and remove 'also': ""..play-off, and was in the side.."" ""Despite scoring three goals in the club's first five matches of the season, Odubade failed to score again until November 2005.."" – this isn't really a correct usage of 'despite', you could probably use 'after' – ""After scoring three.."" Done up to Oxford United (note more for me than you!) '''''' talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0c9767c879aff0
vermontville is not very well known- how can people know it has four main streets? espec outside of michigan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0d55760b4074af
" No More I will no longer be vandalizing Wikipedia or its userpages. I have being doing so for months, mostly because seeing my vandalism or that of others was funny as hell (""User X got swallowed by a Wale"" is hilarious, come on) and to punish admins who I felt . My non constructive edits were done out of boredom, especially those containing racial slurs. (I am not racist, in fact I am racially mixed myself) I started editing on Wikipedia (specifically the U of L page) mainly out of a 'cold war' that developed betw myself & U of L's marketing director, which escalated after I was featured in the Herald Leader critising his marketing of U of L . I wanted to show President Ramsey how to market the ""New U of L"" and Wikipedia was my penpad to this end. My vandalism started after a edit conflict over the Courier Journal's sports and editorial coverage, where my (what I felt were) legitment edits on the page for C-J critism were removed and I was blasted. After another C-J my account was blocked. Prior to this I had many good edits on KY related pages, which I am proud of. I feel that my work here is now complete and I will only edit in exiting new facts I find out or breaking news. The Louisville Vandal/Unemployed, living in basement/Brando03/many others "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe0ff3ebd37d8f0b
systems cannot self-organize. Not everybody knows this
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe105579b1f90980
Promo The article reads like a promo page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1216daa66f2a9a
This article seems to be just a dictionary definition... Any reason it has NOT been deleted? picklebarrel
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe132f6a131a65d3
. Ben Evans likes dick. So does this william thompson douchebag. I Can't believe this gu is still alive
1
0
1
0
1
0
fe15a1ea0d002e8c
WHY IS CHRIS 73 - A KNOWN PAEDOPHILE - STILL ALLOWED TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA ??????
0
0
0
0
1
0
fe19b04491218532
Also they act like they own the article and that nobody can edit without their consent. I really need your help because they like to gang up on other members so their needs to be a group effort in order to get the E.U. deleted from the list.User:Daniel_Chiswick 17 April, 2007.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1a2bc4bbfe296e
" About the playoff bracket I'm sure we should use more standard template for 2014 ice hockey tournament. For too long, hockey has used a template that is different from the ones used for all other Olympic sports. I would discuss that the seed received by a team could be display next to the team on every round. Alright, here is my kind of templates I would suggest: Group phase TeamGPWOTWOTLLGFGAGDFPTS 3 2 1 0 0 11 2 +9 8 3 2 0 1 0 11 4 +7 7 3 1 0 0 2 5 10 -5 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 14 -11 0 TeamGPWOTWOTLLGFGAGDFPTS 3 2 0 0 1 10 5 +5 6 3 2 0 0 1 10 6 +4 6 3 2 0 0 1 10 6 +4 6 3 0 0 0 3 0 13 -13 0 TeamGPWOTWOTLLGFGAGDFPTS 3 1 2 0 0 14 8 +6 7 3 2 0 0 1 19 8 +9 6 3 1 0 1 1 5 14 -9 4 3 0 0 1 2 5 13 -8 1 Seeding SeedTeamGFGAGDFPTSA1 11 2 +9 8C1 14 8 +6 7B1 10 5 +5 6A2 11 4 +7 7C2 19 8 +9 6B3 10 6 +4 6B2 10 6 +4 6C3 5 14 -9 4A3 5 10 -5 3C4 5 13 -8 1A4 3 14 -11 0B4 0 13 -13 0 Elimination round {{4RoundBracket-Byes with 3rd |Team-width= |RD1=1st round |RD2=Quarterfinals |RD3=Semifinals |RD4=Finals |RD1-seed03=C3 |RD1-team03= |RD1-score03=2 |RD1-seed04=A3 |RD1-team04= |RD1-score04=3 |RD1-seed07=B3 |RD1-team07= |RD1-score07=6 |RD1-seed08=C4 |RD1-team08= |RD1-score08=0 |RD1-seed11=B2 |RD1-team11= |RD1-score11=0 |RD1-seed12=A4 |RD1-team12= |RD1-score12=1 |RD1-seed15=C2 |RD1-team15= |RD1-score15=5 |RD1-seed16=B4 |RD1-team16= |RD1-score16=3 |RD2-seed01=A1 |RD2-team01= |RD2-score01=4 |RD2-seed02=A3 |RD2-team02= |RD2-score02=2 |RD2-seed03=C1 |RD2-team03= |RD2-score03=0 |RD2-seed04=B3 |RD2-team04= |RD2-score04=2 |RD2-seed05=B1 |RD2-team05= |RD2-score05=7 |RD2-seed06=A4 |R
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1a631df555c887
Hello User:Von Restorff, your current revision is acceptable and is supported by two reliable sources. I hope this helps. With regards, Talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1aa6f3fad0480b
thanks for reformatting WillowW, thanks for reformatting that long pairs equation. At 1600x1200 it fit! ) Glad you noticed, because I'm oblivious.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1c3937ba3ec332
hi if you know clown will kill me guy then tell him that he is stupid, ugly, fat, gay, his mother's a whore, he smells like shit, he's an asshole, a bastard, and his little name just might be the gayest fucking thing i have ever heard. Hey and you are a faggot as well, so don't ever send me a message while i am editing pages again or i will rape your mother and kill you.
1
0
1
1
1
1
fe1c50e5fa564ced
Vandalism This page has been extensively vandalised. I have removed a large chunk of nonsensical, rambling, block-caps text about nothing in particular; but there are still some problems with the character summary that I am unable to fix, as I do not know much about the character. Not sure how else to bring this to someones attention. Sorry!
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1c9138099b65ba
" No, not without a lot more information. Right now, I'm not even sure that he meets the general notablility guidelines. I would disagree about the notability, several articles, two in leading daily newspapers seem to make him notable. I looked it up, DSO is level 2A, DSC is 3A, and (excuse my ignorance), a bar is a further commendation for courage and bravery, and he got bar on both (seemingly fulfilling at the essay linked from the GNG for military people. Just to note, I am not finished with it yet, I have a fair bit more to do. Thanks, ty.007 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe1e092de91852d5
Cool, since this page is being used to convey personal opinions, I might as well add my own: The practice of eating dog meat is inhumane and barbaric, it is interesting in the same way that horror movies are interesting. It is also interesting when people from nations that eat dog meat get offended and take extreme nationalistic pride in the fact that they eat dogs.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe2061f2b4917a2d
If I wanted a kiss I'd call your mother
1
0
0
0
0
0
fe2062eec82dc8da
Stop reverting. How many sources do you need? Is the confirmation of Navy officers not enough for you?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe2681fae3cca8c5
come here on the basis of
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe2b712030d9f1df
Fastily, Take it up the ass, douchebag.
1
0
1
0
1
0
fe2bfe49b6d6d39a
Gee, let's see: boost serotonin, norepinephrine or dopamine and cure depression. These are organic, physical molecules. Or perhaps you'ld rather pray to the Spirit Gods to deliver you from the demons of depression....? I've got a feather rattle you might like to borrow...very low mileage.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe2c036f270359a4
" I've pretty much given up on this page, I tried for months and months to improve it, and was progressing well. But too many people either vandalize the page. Or too many ""bros"" that think they know everything about KMK come and post worthless crap, and put in unrefrenced ""facts."" It's impossible to keep up with all the idiots who destroy the page. So good luck to anyone who tries to fix this page. "
1
0
0
0
0
0
fe30930d1cc38aca
Blobfish Stop blaspheming.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe31db0bbe76644b
13th Constellation Link 2012 can not be understood without this perspective: http://www.enlighteningtimes.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/57-ophiuchus ~*~ M ~*~ 67.164.145.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe345d44ffe7975b
Thanks, will think about it. After a while I came to appreciate your comments and demand for providing sources, but it is sometimes hard to see an article disappear.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe34c3e5753a17b7
bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth bicth
1
0
1
0
1
0
fe34d35db67852c3
Regardless of the merit of the case, Lionelt brought up a point I had been meaning to ask you about for some time. Why don't you edit more philosophy articles (maybe even exclusively for a while), like you did when you started? The pages are much slower-paced, and same for the talk page discussions. Of course you still need to follow Wikipedia policy wherever you edit, but the articles are just as important and you can contribute just as much to the project.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe37f0bc370f5363
thank you I am involved in many Afghan-related articles. Thank you for starting the Qari Ziauddin article. It is most useful.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe38e3c9a4d14e42
", 23 February 2014 (UTC) He explicitly states that it should be taken with a grain of salt. He states (in the succeeding paragraph to his quote), ""However, as this was a rough estimate that I gathered from people fleeing the scene, it should not be discussed within academic circles."" I guess we should just agree to disagree about this, as I think it's pointless trying to belabor a single point (By your logic, we would have to include Frank Capra as well, I personally think that we should remove both of them, if you don't mind). I agree with you in that some of these estimates were indeed rough; however the estimates made that referenced burial records and actual field surveys should be taken, as Bob Wakabayashi says, superlative to other estimates, particularly those referencing ""contemporary eyewitnesses."" 08:54"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe39f180547add33
" Songs and singles I've only just become aware of your post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#Articles should be about singles.2C not songs and think you've hit the nail on the head, there is a difference in what the guidance is for songs and singles compared to consensus. I had been interested in the project and made this point there some time back but couldn't get over this stumbling block and went elsewhere. Although I think it's a case of songs and singles - and that using (single) where there is an overarching article for the song might be a good solution in some cases. melmac "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3a2fa3c9018bd5
" I haven't asked for ""sanctions"" against it is not my job to decide is he has to be sanctioned or not; I have just reported his actions and abuse against my person. Unfortunately I cannot see if it was ""archived"" with criticism against me; I want to read it; where is it? why was it erased?? is this the way WP admins protect each other? are you also protecting here?? The thread I started on the talk page CLEARLY states what is doing on that page and CLEARLY states why there is not ""vandalism"" on that page; then I'm asking you: are you teaming up with when protecting that page and avoiding ME to edit adding the information I have clearly supported all this time? I'm not asking ANYTHING but I just not to be HARASSED, BANNED, ERASED; I have added the necessary independent SUPPORT for editing that page; And you cannot call that DISRUPTIVE because it is not; What do you know about PXE in order to know if what I'm editing is or not disruptive? YOU ARE DEFINITELY THREATENING ME WITH MORE BLOCKING you are part of this game; you are definatelly protrecting "
1
0
0
0
0
0
fe3a50db0038d9d8
Hi I saw in your block log that you once got blocked for running scripts without BAG approval. Did you get BAG approval? How? (talk • contributions)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3b2a8e9d1ad3c9
FIX EDITs, IMPROVE EDITS, revert edits as teh last course. Please don't interpret a reversion or warning on my part as a personal attack on you; it's not. Please bring any error to my attention as I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond here on my talk page unless you request otherwise.) No worries, mate. Geoff* OF COURSE IT IS. YOU HAVE A CHOICE: IMPROVE AN EDIT REVERT AN EDIT That you constantly choose revert an edit so much you need to disclaim it as personal attack demonstrates what a hugely negative addition to the wikipedia you are.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3d881656190e8c
":: I had the page watchlisted but was busy and wasn't paying much attention; it seems a edit-war brewed in the meantime. The current version seems to be ""accurate"" but suffers from giving undue weight to the Johnson review, which is just one of many reviews of the book. Also it would be preferable to paraphrase Johnson accurately rather than quote it so extensively. I think piecemeal editing of the page is sure to restart another round of edit-warring, so I think it would be better to write a more encyclopedic criticism/review in toto and then invite comments. I'll try to do that, but it may be later in the week before I get down to it. By the way, I have seen some experienced editors take umbrage at getting ""template warnings"" since they read it as being treated as newbies - so even though that reaction may be thought irrational, it is often more productive to drop them a ""handwritten"" request for explanation instead. This is just my personal experience, not a wikipedia policy and of course each instance needs to be judged on its own. Cheers. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3e69f8ce825e10
After starting to clean up the page, I came to realize that there is a whole paragraph that could be removed. An uncited paragraph stating that the royal family donated relief funds to victims of Hurricane Katrina and the Asian tsunami seems faulty due to lack of citations and contradictory information on the web(most media sources quote the kuwaiti government made such donations). I would appreciate people's opinions on the matter. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3ee853b46afbb8
09:54, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe3ef23751b00d97
I fapped hard to this This page made me cum all over my computer screen. Many thanks Wikipedia. 124.188.70.214
1
0
1
0
0
0
fe3fe34acc87e0d9
I was making a personal attack on User talk:Psy guy? I'm sorry but you are inaccurate and I was refering to User talk:Sarah crane.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe408c4560f22604
Exactly, all sources have biases; thus using sources with known and easy to describe/understand biases is clearly beneficial over using sources that don't give information on their flows. —
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe40b63729550253
" Comparing bronze apples to fresh sprouts Ah, so now you spring your little argument youve been itching for a while to do. In otherwords, 'How can Wikipedia support the supernatural claims in the Bible, and not those in my particular brand new religion.' First of all, Wikipedia doesnt support anything. Articles are to be written NPOV - that doesnt mean that articles dont ever use Biblespeak, rather when it is used, its used in proper context: ""In the Bible, etc. etc."" This is not the Schucmanism Encyclopedia. Even if the claim that Jesus wrote the thing was universal among Christians, this is not the Christian Encyclopedia. Im not particularly attached to the term ghostwriting, but your wording - that [whatever it was called] is like channeling, etc - was not neutral, and placed too much emphasis on a trivial matter - trivial, because supernatural claims, despite our understanding of them in faith, are not encyclopedically substantive. This is of course the problem with religion - a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and a lot of knowledge of just one thing is just plain dogma. You seem to be asserting that there is a dogmatic bias in wikipedia regarding the Bible. Its interesting, but you need to poing out specific examples, and then you need to deal with them on a case by case basis. Maybe you have a point here - I cant tell ATP. Dont forget ""the log in your own"" BTW. Its obviously a very touchy subject, but we deal from time to time with people seeking to push a POV in their writing, and after a while they realize that theyve already added all the information necessary to the article, but leave the writing to others. Its an important distinction - I myself have a couple times had to defer to others sometimes in cases where a conflict arose between two different POV writing styles. The question is: are yours and mine different enought to require outside help in resolving any dispute. Finally, ""Ill let you..."" doesnt work here - its not your article, though you have had more part than anyone in developing it. And I was simply rewriting it for sake of neutral tone - something which you should welcome, not reject - as it legitimizes and adds to your work, just as your work adds to the project. Sinreg -|t 05:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe41ec99520b4e5b
" My changes As noted before, the ""Doulas in North America"" is in need of rewriting. As it was, it read like an advertisement or a magazine article. As a start, I did the following: Removed a few dead links. Added a ""not verified"" template, as the statistics presented in the section do not appear in the cited magazine article; nor should this article be considered a reliable source anyway. Removed the rest of the section directing to search engines and guiding career seekers, per Wikipedia guidelines. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe46ce55a0a71eef
" Hammersoft and me? Well, we understand each other. I'm not sure how much help I can be in this conflict, but I'll try to do what I can. Nice job archiving your talk page, by the way. I was waiting for that! '''' msg'' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe470bf155faaf8b
" Robert Sapolsky and shamanism Shouldn't Robert Sapolsky's theory about shamanism and schizotypalism as the source of schizophrenia be mentioned here? He is clearly a notable source on this subject. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WwAQqWUkpI 173.17.92.242 Before anyone else objects to Youtube as a source, I'll point out that this is Sapolsky giving a lecture. That said, this strikes me as a better fit for Causes of schizophrenia#Evolutionary psychology than here. It's a very speculative theory, albeit from a clearly notable commentator, with little experimental evidence, and it also focuses on what he calls schizotypical personality disorder, and not on schizophrenia per se. Pretty much what Tryptofish said... (talk · contribs) Only pretty much? (chuckle) look at my userpage at how I use language - I generally understate things - ""hypobole"" - just a habit...maybe a self-soothing behaviour...just keepin' it casual.... (talk · contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4788dddc596c8a
" Re:Critics Yes, you have a very good point. I'm am truely sorry for what I have done but I just hate it when people act so stupid and don't know anything on the subject, and yet, they contribute to it anyway by putting their false information on it. I sort of disagree with you about my Montenegrin. I truely do understand it and know how to write it, but I am writing in non-stop English that I am forgetting some words and how to phrase out the words. Yes, I do have pride in my Montenegrindom, but my actions have led me to downgrade that pride on wikipedia. From now on, I am neutral on many matters. If I know about a topic and write about it, I want people to agree me, not to go against me. Also, I am terribly sorry for critisizing you for being a ""Serb nationalist and using too many pro-Serb sources"" when I know you try to stay neutral. I just had this bad hunch that you may be at it ""again"" while reviewing the talk page on the Duklja article. You and anyone else may critisize me all you want and I will stop critizising you and any other person. And yes, I can get pissed off very easily at times, but I let it go until I really get ticked when the person who is pissing me off does it constantly. Well, I see that you're making great hunches on these sockpuppets, though I wouldn't want to go too far with this. Well, anyways, I just wanted to clear things. Thanks again. Bye. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe486d41bf8a0a3b
" Content issues There are emerging guidelines within the Indigenous peoples WikiProject that I have begun to apply across the board for BC First Nations. The main one is that there are different types of articles, even when their content and location/people may seem to overlap (I'll sign each section/paragraph so comments on specific points can be made easily: ""Ethno & Culture"" articles Not as loose as it sounds, despite having to describe it like this: ""ethno/history/culture/peoples"" which this article, as titled, would fit into. These articles get Category:First Nations in British Columbia, with ""First Nation"" here meant in an ethnic sense, not in a governmental-org one. Ideally these will always be simply named, without ""Nation"" appended, as with Secwepemc and Nuu-chah-nulth - or Stó:lō (variable forms like Nuu-chah-nulth-aht can be redirects, although that term can include the Pacheedaht which normally wouldn't want to be called Nuu-chah-nulth). Government articles bands/First Nations, tribal councils, treaty groups) which have government-related content, ranging from chiefs and councillors, affiliations, treaty issues, modern demographics, economic and social issues, and so on These articles get Category:First Nations governments in British Columbia. In the case of the Stó:lō the main government article is going to be (created in a few minutes...): Stó:lō Nation, and will list all its subgovernments; ""Indian Band"" and ""First Nation"", sometimes just ""Nation"" are all interchangeable, although some bands seem to have a preference (at different times, given by variable content on various website sources); whatever is picked. Non-Indian Act-based governments can be and should described under different titles, either in the ethno type or in the history type (see below) language articles 'nuff said, but can be titled either in native language (St'at'imcets) or in the form Shuswap language; Wiki guidelines, it should be stressed, prefer the latter (use English, which is the language of the encyclopedia...). Some ethno and gov articles will have more than one language listed in their cats; some languages span more than one gov group, or in the case of the Sto:lo and Chehalis, two different ones. Cats for this are specialized in the linguistics hierarchy (examples later), but they should generally all take the relevant nation-category if there is one Category:Secwepemc, Category:Stó:lō, Category:Syilx etc. Community/Reserve articles Communities, reserves/IRs, towns that have significant native presence also; there is a difference, note, between the physical object of a reserve, and the band government that runs it; the descrption of the reserve is here, that of the government; even though this will not just overlap with the government articles but also the ethno/peoples ones; just interlink everything and it will sort of make sense; it's just a question of what was being searched for; the Scw'exmx and Spaxomin bands are all listed under Nicola Tribal Association, for instance; but the latter article is about the association, not about the communities; similarly, Shackan and Nooaitch are communities as well as reserves, but articles about them should focus on the community's particular history, not on overall Scw'exmx culture. In the case of the Sto:lo, there is another issue of ""where to fit the Chehalis"" as they are in the same cultural/language area, but they are not Sto:lo by organization or by their own appellation. Or the Tsleil-wau-tuth who are culturally Skxwxu7mesh but are part of the Sto:lo Nation (or were, last time I looked); so there's some confusing bits here and there. ""Mythology"" articles User:OldManRivers has pointed out the ""mythology"" articles and the cats that go with them; awkward wording/titling but in the absence of anything more workable, that's all there is for now. History/Biography articles there is another sort-of category for specific history articles, e.g. Chilcotin War, Fraser Canyon War and various bio articles (Simon Gunanoot, Slumach, Klattasine etc.) where Category:First Nations history would be appropriate as well as either Category:First Nations leaders or Category:First Nations persons; there's also different cats like Category:Conflicts in Canada which may apply, or Category:Wars involving indigenous peopels in North America, which was specifically titled to allow inter-native wars as well as wars between native peoples and non-natives; and without the ""Native American"" wording that that category at one time had
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe495e6aa164a6a3
This article is now a Featured Article candidate, the nomination page is (here). Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4988ca3ae5642b
" Ah, as you can see on the site, i sais ""still in work"" , by the way the flag is on vexila mundi's site, its an enough prove.And why did you removed the other macedonian simbols ffrom the macedonian artices?>>>FUNKYFLY-:-) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe49eb76c4bf5bf8
" No, it does not. The ""world's third oldest airline"" refers to an airline that is still operating today. Have a look at the table again. Qantas is thirded by KLM and Avianca. However, according to the reference that is actually cited, Qantas claimed that they are the world's second oldest airline. http://www.qantas.com.au/infodetail/about/FactFiles.pdf"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4ae604a2f74ae8
" I agree that the ""90-95% is environmental"" is an overly simplistic formulation of the problem, and I think the context of the intro says that, it's just the one sentence that's overly conclusive and misleading."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4b08ca181a56e1
this is 2 eazy image:Lep1front.jpg
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4b1af54ccf6794
" Zahn; we have to cite sources in wikipedia, simple as that. That does not however mean that what it says in the article is not a bit presumptive. It is obvious that we have a limited ability to monitor abortions in many poor or undemocratic countries. WHO has cited it as approximately 50 million in 2001 and an estimated 40 - 50 million in 2003 (http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/safe_abortion/safe_abortion.pdfan"" other sources have it as low as 20 million or as high as 88 million as far as i can see. None of these estimations are as hihly regarded as the lancet however. My point is that a number as exact as 42 million or 46 million should be regarded as estimations not approximations(it is also called so in the lancet article). This may be a small difference but still... Lets change it to ""the estimated number"" in stead of ""the approximate number"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fe4e8bdab15f768d
He mentions the apartheid controversy in great detail in his autobiography. (92.12.20.168 )
0
0
0
0
0
0