id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fe4ebeee6b35097e | .jpg
Door gunner - Doorgunner01a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5029b2b33fde62 | Your Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, SpK. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe52065c5277a42f | "
Hello RR.
I think the link to the Railway Performance Society should be included for a few reasons. Readers can see what the society is about and whether they think its references and research are worthy. Furthermore, to be frank, the RPS generally at least wants some publicity for using ""their"" sources and data, which, to be frank, I think is fair enough, it`s not as if they`re a business in it to make money. If you want to move the link to the reference at the bottom of the page be my guest. I think this is a classic case where an inflexible attitude to Wikipedia`s ""rules"" is counter productive. As I say on my ""User page, we shouldn`t lose sight of why we`re actually here.
On the Cecil J Allen book, it is actually a book which I have in my collection, the full title is ""Locomotive practice & Performance in the 20th Century"", first published by Heffer in 1949.
On the reference thing, my eyes just glaze over when I see that, my brain is already full.... Just as I sometimes edit others grammatical errors, I`m quite happy for others to edit my references if they want !
Incidentally, is there a spelling checker on the Wikipedia software because the one on my Google toolbar doesn`t seem to work on Wiki editing for some reason. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe52358c4e5d4c55 | ":Looks like you've received helpful comments at the various refdesks. Personally, I've found outlines to be helpful in terms of organizing boatloads of info that you would otherwise have to trudge through manually; we're a huge encyclopedia, so they certainly make navigation more convenient. –'''''' | Talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe52c2db57f7665e | "==Ebony Bones image==
Re this message which you left on my talk page. I removed the photo because it is copyright violation and up for speedy deletion. See . The way you had added it also messed up the format of the infobox. Thumbnail coding is never used in infoboxes. The second time, I left the photo you insist on restoring but merely fixed the format . You likewise reverted that, leaving this mess. You're right about one thing: ""Vandalism and trolling will not be tolerated"". You should stop doing it and you should stop trying to evade this block. If you want to ask for page protection, you may do so at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, although it is highly likely that this will backfire on you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe53d3f7a340d126 | College Baseball Rankings
Hey Billcasey,
What do you think about adding the forthcoming Top 25 rankings from Perfect Game USA and D1Baseball.com to 2015 NCAA Division I baseball rankings and Template:NCAA Division I baseball ranking movements? Both of these are notable college baseball reporting websites, as PG has been big for a while now and D1Baseball just hired two of the biggest guys in the business in PG's Kendall Rogers and Baseball America's Aaron Fitt. Or do you think six different rankings is too much? Let me know your thoughts. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe583e3374e6df30 | FUCK YOU
FUCK YOU AGAIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
fe5a5a5440d541f1 | I think Computer and possibly industrial should be added. Although, I think the best idea is to remove this whole section and simply have a link to all the branches. Opinions? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5b526cfc197514 | "
Mahmud Kahghari should be replaced by another figure. He was not from Turkey/ Ottoman Empire and therfore does not fit into this article ""Turkish people"". " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5cbd29088bb73d | Aw, thanks for kind words! I've been slowly developing this article for the past two years now. This Wednesday (October 8th) is the 2nd anniversary of this article's DYK (also coinciding with the feast day of the cathedral's namesake). — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5ce5b73f2e4c47 | "
Erm, I don't mean that anybody else told me that I was unsuited. I just know that I am unsuited. (My idea of clothing: Choose whatever's closest to hand and doesn't need washing. My idea of hairstyling: Let it go wherever it seems to want to go; if it's long enough to need contrary persuasion, go to the barber and when he asks ""Same as usual"" answer ""Yup"".)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5edb7147e91cda | "
New pic & non-journalistic references
Hi all. A couple of suggestions for articles like this. If we must use media as the only references (at least in the short term), can we lose the meaningless journalistic terminology? ""14 times closer"" is meaningless (think ""twice as small""). Similarly, ""gray line"", and water and carbon dioxide as ""elements"". These I have changed, but I'm sure there are others. Finally, couldn't someone modify the stock image used at the end to show where in the potentially-habitable zone this planet would lie? (i.e. add a ball 1.5 times the shown Earth size to the lower left of the zone.) That would be much more meaningful than the standard stock pic shown now. Just a couple of thoughts. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe5f42f95f6df8ec | Yep your pov pushing FYROM is redundant and you twisted my words from the start Fever | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe60cfd3b362b823 | Jeffrey Skitch
Yet again, I do all I can in an evening and the next morning wake up to a brilliant article. Excellent job! I'll have a look at it today Ss and think of a joint DYK. All the best. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe60ea3f6418e7bf | fucking
faggot
hopefully somone rapes or eats you soon you fucking idiot | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
fe6176fd01178eff | If anything the article shouldnt be put trough speedy deletion but an AfD. The person has a article on Swedish Wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe620f55dbbd043b | the playground games continue...
ive posted this on the clairvoyance talk page after someone completely removed the clar#irsentience article which had gone through a process of months of work , rewrites , endless discussion , removasl of personal matereal , edits for style and content .... endless work on correct sourcing and wikpedia referencing and formatting..... the article which had been arrived at with co operation and discussion over many weeks and v man who himself put some hours into grammer , punctuation ... re editting for stlye and content ... and much help in correct sourcing and referencing .....
this article was the sum of many peoples input , effort and hard work so i dont know how or who removed it so thoughtlessly and put the meaningless redirect to the clairvoyance page... any help would be great.... cheers..
hi guys
i see youve redirected the clairsentience article.... let me ask....what was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anyway....you should have told me t get lost out of here...... what was the point of it all? why did i listen to you ? at all? why did i remove all personal references? why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail ? why did i edit and re edit for style and content ? why did i make additional references to religios , anthropological ,socialogical , philosophical ,medical , physics , chemistry , botany , mental health etc so that all views were included and respected? why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort. your actions are without integrity or honour .....
clairsentience article redirect ?
Hi ..... whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect ... can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period......
.........i could delete this clairvoyance article.... but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl......
..... i hope you can respect the clairsentience article...
..... ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example..... so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it.... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe6440121ddd1158 | "
I wish that was possible, but it's not. Your protection options are full protection, where only administrators can edit it, or semi protection, where any autoconfirmed user can edit it. See WP:PROT, it has all the possible protection types and more specific information on them. (T•C••) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe652a23c4b35e1f | "
Have you looked at the SSP report for Fredrick day? Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fredrick day. He's got his own variable IP access, plus he has some wireless networks in his neighborhood. That's his IP, 99.99%. (Notice that there are two edits, different IP in the same block.) And the text is pure Fd. Look, you see IP from a certain range editing parlipro articles, you draw a certain conclusion, and you are pretty likely to be correct. The level of necessary coincidence for this to not be Fd would be astronomical. The particular interest in Sarsaparilla's edits, the mention of me, plus the first two IP fields, this is Fd. The vast majority of Fd IPs have not seen any edits before he started using them, they could probably be safely blocked ... but I'm not terribly exercised about it. I'd revert them if I thought them damaging. I hadn't looked at the other edits. I will. Anyway, thanks. And my apologies for any possible insult in what I wrote, but this whole affair has been about very selective attention. I'm seeing it happen with other editors. Once there is a pall over an editor, especially an active one, every move is scrutinized by anyone who ever had a conflict with him; one editor now, 25,000 edit level, is clearly being harassed, yet it looks like ArbComm will sanction him, not those who are harassing him. (For what? For complaining, it looks like.) We'll see.
In Sarsaparilla's case, Fd was there with one vicious personal attack after another, on AN/I, and where was the attention being put? On Sarsaparilla, for having put up an article on the Easter Bunny hotline. We don't normally indef block users for putting up a non-notable article! ""Last straw,"" is what is said, of course. Problem is, there was not much more than three straws. Not three tons of offenses, plus a straw. Do I ""excuse"" Sarsaparilla's behavior. No. But neither would I excuse Mozart for making fart jokes at the court of the ruler. On the other hand, I wouldn't want to see Mozart executed for it.
I've already written too much here. I'll write to you off-wiki. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe6d24fae682478a | The effect is to support the efforts of paedophiles, isn't it? PHD is an exceptionally good editor and has a strong scientific knowledge of the subject. Why was he banned in the first place? Why this secrecy? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe6f3711c20784bd | "
Coaches category
No, I don't know, sorry. I had a look through the various WP pages on categorisation but couldn't find anything helpful. You don't want to split the article into individuals rather than family? ~ • talk • " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe6fbe0d87f48904 | RE: Sasayama:
I am Sasayama and I still have many accounts on here which you will never find. fuck ya.
What type of undies did you say you wear?
love ya long time! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe747a9940802b32 | Could you protect the article? 'Cause he is going to continue edit-warring I think. Regards. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe74d6a111aac19b | User:LessHeard VanU ==
What is your problem? Why did you block me without a warning? I believe Administrative Abuse is prohibited. I don't even know you. Go get some mental help.
== | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe7536722837f9d7 | There, all 'personal attacks' removed with regards to stated ethical guidelines. Now, please do not read too much into simple statements & opinions & let's chat - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe777e15fbf1eadd | the holocaust museums address is 100 Raoul Wallenberg PL SW Washington DC, 20024. OR 100 15 ST SW DC, hence they are the same street. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe780d1295bd6473 | guys there sure is alot of 30 rock on this page | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe78d354ed9edb59 | Quit harrassing my talk page
Wikipedia is not a medium for harrassment. If you don't like to be reprimanded for saying stupid things, then don't say them to someone who isn't willing to put up with it. I have every right to use and build upon Wikipedia as any other peaceful user. This is your last warning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe7934cfa34ded00 | Um, I know you think you're arguing with me, but you're actually agreeing with me. I was not looking to add adjectives where there were none, but to at least qualify the unqualified ones, which served more to limit than elucidate. As far as your criticism of my metaphor and its appropriateness for an encyclopedia article, note that I did not include it in the encyclopedia article: I included it in a note in the discussion on the article. My contribution to the article itself was brief and concise, and has been allowed to remain in place by all subsequent edits.Your disdain is terribly intellectually impressive, but you're not really arguing with anyone. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe79a2cc8f8c8df7 | "
Reference for Micheli Judgment is secondary source GTrial
28-Apr-2010: This is a reminder that the huge Italian text, used as a reference for the Micheli Judgment, is a secondary source as merely a summary (though huge), at website www.Penale.it, of the Judge Paolo Micheli's court document. Several editors have mistakenly thought it was a primary source, because it is so large and contains many details from the original text. The reference has been listed, in the article, as:
""Judgement 28.10.2008"", Dr. Paolo Micheli, dep. 2009-01-26, Court of Perugia Italy, trial of Rudy Hermann Guede, (Google Translation, Italian to English) Translate.google.com, Italian webpage: Penale.it. Retrieved 2009-12-11.
In that gigantic summary document, many sections have been abridged by indicating ellipsis by 2-dot marks ""(..)"" in many portions of the text. Some of the omitted details are forensic measurements that pinpoint items in a room. The copyright (at bottom) is:
© 2006 Copyright Penale.it - SLM - Nyberg Srl 1999-2006Tutti i diritti riservati (English: All rights reserved)
Perhaps some text describing the actual Micheli Judgment ""Motivazioni sentenza per Rudy Guede"" (the primary source) should be added into the article, as one of the many key details not yet included in the text (Note: in Italian titles, typically only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized). Again, reftag ""GTrial"" is a secondary source (not a primary source) summarizing, on an Italian website, the much larger Micheli Judgment document. -Wikid77 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe7d1c88dee06697 | 1 - The user is clearly canvassing with the anti Mega Drive agenda.
2 - As a user can remove anything from their user pages, other users can also add anything.
3 - Your actions show you support the collusion and canvassing.
4 - You should study the definition of harassment until you understand it.
5 - Coming here and threatening me is harassment, me pointing out other users canvassing with a pro Genesis bias is not. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe8218a78ae9d945 | Thank you
Thank You for Punishing me as i know i crossed the limits .plz look at the history of Barelwi what mezzo mezzo has done he reverted my edits even undispured heading biasedly. It is his regular habit to Insert his Personal Views in that Article. he continued after it also . (t • c) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe8753f1ab72bb74 | I don't want to install twinkle, I can use popups to revert vandalism. I will complete task 4 with that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe888e45860ea108 | , 2011
| publisher =Prepared by the US Department of Energy
| url =http://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-20279.pdf | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe88c456b623e71a | It sounds really silly to say reverting vandalism is a trangression. Also threatening me for appealing unfair blocks? Are you a power hungry ego booster? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe88dd13081ff77b | Eek, I am very new to the Wiki world and definitely have a lot to learn. Thanks, and let me know if you have more tips. I will attempt to clean up this entry and keep it more factual, unbiased, and establish a broad range of topics so that I don't get the COI tag or any others. I just started contributing this week and have a lot more that I think I could add to the wiki world... just have to learn how to do it correctly. If you have advice, I'd love to hear it. I think varying topics and building a diverse profile will help. Cheers! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe8aca8615d51880 | "
I'm Online
If you want to discuss anything or whatever, I'm online for a little bit. talk to me " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe8b08c7b8a598ca | ok here's the problem. I have been having symptoms of pregnancy recently and it is scaring me to death! I also had the IUD Mirena inserted about a year ago, so I don't know if these symptoms could be from the Mirena either. I have been bloated recently, I have been eating quite a bit, I have been having mood swings, and I have had some pinkish spotting for occur for the past few days. It is around my time to have my period also. Me and my boyfriend have sex quite often, but he always uses protection unless we do anal. The last time we had sex was Jan18, 2009. Can anyone please help me? I am so scared and I don't know if these symptoms are from the Mirena or if I am pregnant or not. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe8d560a78cd14e1 | Most countries have had political leaders shot. Would you like a list? Even your own country's execution of Nicolae Ceauşescu following a farce show trial does not get a mention on the Romania page nor do the other incidents. Do you have another reason for keeping this in because I need something stronger than your position as it stands. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe90c5517c001c27 | Responding to the bit mentioning a turbocharger probably severed of separate listings, the same reason why I separated the lot from my edits. After reading this section two years ago (ETCC details and Volvo's tricks of the trade) lus your edits on that page was why I ended up broken some of these bits off.
I will accept the Corolla bit as I only suggested because there is a separate page for the AE86, which the info for the AE85 is bundled into.
My reason for separating the XR4Ti is, although there is a Sierra XR4i (2.8 litre), but there is no Sierra XR4Ti (turbo 2.3 litre) as it is simply a rebadged US market Merkur XR4Ti, that is what Andy Rouse said in an interview for the January 2008 issue of evo (page 101), plus he said that they were used to develop the Sierra Cosworth. Also there is an article for it, so that is why I split it off.
Replying to The BMWs were split because there is no such road car as an E36 so how do you list the BMW 318i & 320i. There is, it an article called BMW 3 Series, BMW downsized the 320 to its 318 because BMW said back in '94 believed that the latter is more rev happier.
As for Supras, this is like saying that the FT0 should be put in the same listing as the Galant FT0 and the recent GT-R should be put in the same listing as the Skyline GT-R. They were simply nameplates that ended up being separated off from its usual range, plus the Celica Supra was a top range Celica as it was based on the same chassis and used the same bodyshell.
Just to point out that I am not a big expert on The Great Race but a fan of the track and the race, so I am not going to know every car that entered the race, hence I don't plan to take the split any further as I have as done much as I can. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe90fe5141c08138 | MALTESE IS ARABIC! Not Italian! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe92fb2a20430401 | I wrote this article for my blog | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe9626dfa74adeaf | The above vote does not count unless it is signed. Anyway, what one might use to get to this article is immaterial to what the title, since that can all be handled with redirects. Where the title matters is in specifying to the reader the most common name used to refer to the subject of the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe97761bdbb733aa | "
This article was nominated for deletion on December 14, 2005.
The result of the discussion was keep.
An archived record of this discussion can be found here." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe97b6fdd5f57615 | Whatever
Where did the scar on her left cheek came from anyway? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe9ae97044839382 | oh do piss off tarage! if i'm to be questioned or if this comment is to be vanquished on ground of civility after you're constantly being prick to whole loads of unique, most probably ready for first contribution contributors than this whole place may be called kokitus. Schmuck. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe9b6cf92b1f04c7 | "
The photograph you claim is copyrighted is sourced currently from Wikipedia Commons and came originally from Flicka where it was published under a valis licence that permits its reproduction here. To get it deleted you need to notify Wikimedia Commons adminstrators. Once and if they delete it from Commons it will no longer be used on the Shakin' Stevens page.
You cannot remove items from the page that are sourced and referenced. On wikipedia what counts is not what is true or false but what can be sourced and backed up. Additionally you cannot cut and paste text from another website, even the official and authorised copy from the Shaky site, because of copyright issues.
Wikipedia can be extremely frustrating for new editors in your position and operates under rules and guidelines that can drive a sane person to distraction. Good luck in your efforts, but tread a little slower. GREENSTUFF " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe9da2d0545ef49e | "
Please explain your basis and authority for deciding when tags are allowed are allowed. You seem to be exhibiting a sense of ownership of this page in violation of Wikipedia's policy WP:OWN. This isn't about me ""keeping"" a tag or you deciding if that is allowed, but rather an attempt to reach consensus on editing this page. I'm reverting your removal of the tag.
The central fact of Tibetan culture today is the split between Tibetans in exile, led by the official government in exile in Dharamsala, and Tibetans inside China, some of whom support Chinese administration and some don't. The article as it stands pretends that this split does not exist, which is exactly the position of the Chinese government. That's merely the beginning of the POV slanting here. In terms of literature specifically, the article waves its hand vaguely at many centuries of Tibetan literature, then focuses heavily on a contemporary literary organization established by the Chinese government. Even the literary cliques identified use standard Chinese naming ""the 4 blanks"", ""the 3 blanks.""
Most striking is the complete absence of any mention of the Tibetan government in exile in Dharamsala, India, which has a literary office and a significant library. There are many books of poetry, songs and stories by Dalai Lamas through history; none are represented here. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fe9f14e679d9311e | Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) This is a page for Talking Tom and Friends Character, Talking Ben. I want to add a picture but it says I am not a Confirmed or Auto confirmed User, which means that this account is not 4 days old. But I only joined yesterday so this is not fair. I think instead of deleting it, you should at least try to improve it and make it better rather than deleting the whole page. This is why this article should not be a candidate for speedy deletion.
Ukvoltaire123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea05626f353b4da | redneck means racist, idiotic English
redneck actually means english. i am not saying all english but brobablt % 99.99 of them. It means racist, idiot, scumbag etc | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea08080d437902b | Good Faith? Yes, thanks for the reminder, I'm sure I've got a template in here somewhere... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea0e65815670b4c | :::That thread is probably more important than most of us here even realise. Every post made in that thread hit every nail squarely on the head. Even I with my famous talent for cynical prose couldn't have said it better.
makes a valid point above. I don't think it will be possible to overturn the election, but it's what should be done. Even my anecdotal suggestion for an election system might have better results. One of the problems is getting a decent selection of nominees. Perhaps there should be a run up to the election where users can nominate and second candidates, then let the candidate decide if s/he wants to run in the election along with the self-noms | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea2e7c0c6208609 | THANK YOU for PAYING ATTENTION!
Luckily these morons only know about two celebs I work for, and NONE of my clients could care less about wiki. What we all care about is the link to the official site so the option for true and relevant information is available to them. We don't have time to play the wiki-troll game. So, YES, you can see the history of this omnitroll, and that username was created JUST for editing those two pages. I expect the user terminated, and the connecting profiles to be found and terminated. You can see the moronic trail they left in the history, regardless of username. It's all the same trolls.
Again, we could care less about anything this site offers, but if information of my clients is going to be posted, the link to the official pages MUST be included.
See to it that the links are NEVER removed, and you will NEVER see me again. Simple as that.
I have several systems to choose from, so edits are never an issue. Block my ass, and I will still shit on the trolls.
Thanks again! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
fea2f455c0f369c2 | "saying ""the monarch became monarch""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea37b7908c33f8e | Image:Fearinthenight.jpg
I have tagged Image:Fearinthenight.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea5154545d39475 | "
It was just that I saw no grounds at all to hold the vote again; the reasoning why the move should have occured despite the vote result was quite clear, so per WP:IAR and WP:UCS... Ah, never mind. — (?) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea62888f0d0377b | Wikipedia
Where can i get permission from Wikipedia to put a page in my movie as a line? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea92b3ab8474ff4 | You can add information about yourself on your user page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea94f1d53cd9485 | It was actually great! I had told him that someone would check behind him and help with minor corrections or better wording so he should be bold and write. He did not preview change before he posted and I was setting up for another class and did not see it. Proved the system works! Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fea966ed4bea04dd | It's simply a typical media trick: Trying to blow everything out of all proportion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feaab16fa797b82e | 3RR
Just out of curiosity, have you ever considered RESEARCHING complaints before throwing out bans willy-nilly? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feabbd963ca3b068 | I think you have answered your own question then. Wikipedia is the 6th busiest website in the world, with some of the best authors, scientists and other specialists editing here. And yes, lots of less talented people, ordinary people. You greatly underestimate what Wikipedia really is, and it looks like you aren't open minded enough to find out. None of us have all the answers, and those that think they do are a problem. Where ever you go, I wish you luck and happiness. I've done all I can do here. - 2¢ © Join WER | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feaeaa7cd8cec063 | Stop archiving the on-going discussion on Stefan Banach
You will need to stop archiving the on-going discussion of Stefan Banach.
This discussion page is not large enough to justify archiving.
You will not be allowed to censor the discussion by moving it into the archive. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feaf2f29e2dee340 | Lisa Donovan
You claim there is no such thing as SPAMing an image, but if you would have checked the history you would see the user tried repeatedly to upload it from non licensed sites and other tactics, further the image it self says the license is in doubt. I am also an inclusionist, if you will. However, I don't think people should abuse Wikipedia with copyrighted images licensed wrong. Seem fair? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feb069c98caaeb17 | REDIRECT Talk:The Last Battle (book) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feb12578b20d67cf | Read you mother fucker or you shall fucking die you cocksucking prick
You can go to hell you fucking cocksucker and now I shall go ahead and masturbate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
feb375248cb7135c | question
can I please ask you a question? I saw your edits to the Marvel Zombies discussion page. I was just wondering, why do you read these horror comics so much? Do they genuinely give you so much pleasure and excitement you really think it is perfectly fine to read them? Do they provide near-sexual pleasure for you? Because I realy am confused. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feb37d5968db4bc9 | Oppose. OK, so the company merged. That is not a reason to delete the old article. It should remain and a link about the merger to the old company name should be in the Deloitte article, and this link is already there. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feb8eade076314ea | Article Reads like a Tabloid
This article reads like a tabloid. The subject of the article should be treated in a neutral manner. The article lacks neutrality. I agree that some of the content is notable, but outing people and articles about outing people then rubbing their face in ti unless I am mistaken is frowned upon by Wikipedia. Did I miss something. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feb96eb5102a2661 | How can you agree with a statement about the author of the article, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feba3c03c59b8ee8 | "
Okay, media commentator and related matters. I repeat the text you suggested above:Ijaz has also served as a media commentator, frequently writing opinion pieces and appearing on television news programs over the past two decades. He was exclusively retained by Fox News in the period immediately following the September 11 attacks, appearing on Fox programs over 100 times. He was a popular guest on the network's Special Report broadcast.Do you have any source that states all of this, and/or a collection of sources that together state this? In this situation, we can't simply cite your opinion pieces, because no single opinion piece is good for ""frequently writing"", and taking a bunch of opinion pieces and saying ""see, it's frequently"" is the kind of thing addressed by our no-original-synthesis standard. ""Appearing on TV news..."" This is slightly different, since a few references to TV appearances over the years would establish that you weren't a one-time guest, but again a secondary source would help by demonstrating that TV appearances were significant. Although I know you're not a mediæval soldier, the retainer thing is a rather specific detail that really shouldn't appear unless we have a source for it — could you find something published by Fox, or something from somewhere else, noting that they'd officially retained you? As I noted above, I looked for sources of this sort but was unable to find them. Finally, about a Further reading section — do you know of any books that talk about you at length in a favorable light? I'd like to present the Al Franken book together with a similar work from the opposite perspective. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feba3d60760c098c | One should add that a user who has been given a fresh start is expected to reform, not carry on the way they were acting before. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
febcff958a481f0f | Yeah, I'd prefer if you stop ignoring my request and act upon it, not wait until it expires automatically. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
febd373e8a47fe32 | Request comments
If you are interested in advocating a change in the existing consensus for how to deal with articles about online gambling companies, please contribute to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poker#Tokwiro_Enterprises and offer your view. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
febfee136ffdecba | HI! No I am sorrry to hear that. But who has wrote more articles on here me or you? Maybe nexxt time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec09aeb4b858aaa | "
Image:Sayanything2.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Sayanything2.GIF. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Raising-Arizona-.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Raising-Arizona-.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Talk
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jvcover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jvcover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec1e56fbef8ae85 | the board members are for PRG... just called info centre as per ASX site | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec42bc28d73c346 | Eligibility because (married to a) Catholic
Are we sure that it is simply being Roman Catholic that bars eligibility, or is it not being Anglican/Protestant? Would a Moslem or a Greek Orthodox be able to be titular head of the Church of England? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec51036357617b4 | Comparison of netbook-oriented Linux distributions
Please see WP:REDLINK, they are useful. Cheers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec60c81b2da7231 | I don't need luck because after all everyone here is acting on good faith and wants the best dataset to be used. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fec73b897ca5d6a5 | "
Is the British National Front running things?
This is what I wrote here earlier today and a wikipedia editor who has on his User Page was clearly offended. My oh my. My bad. So, here it is again:
Personally speaking (of course) I think the British should just give up the ghost, get over their loss of empire, and start living side-by-side with the Irish without feeling the need for such jingoistic terms like ""British Isles"". After Germany and France, Ireland remains Britain's third largest market in absolute terms, a quite surprising reality which is often overlooked. That's a lot of jobs in Britain depending on just being respectful neighbours to the Irish. Economic sanity, not to mention neighbourliness, is on the side of avoiding this term. 86.42.99.141 ." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fecc5935e3a0804a | "
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hello!, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feccda0f04f7c40f | ", 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Adjusted. (of the Occult) 04:55" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fed13c18da6d0084 | Thanks!
Always nice to see someone willing to step up and really dig into an article to improve it when it's brought to AfD. Much appreciated. Cheers, talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fed3debd752f0396 | It's been a while since I posted this for discussion and nobody has any comment on it.
What would you suggest I do? Post it again on Aaron?
Anybody want to discuss this before I post it? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fed63c59d907c680 | You mean medicine that has been supported by peer reviewed evidence. OK, point taken. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fed8313c0fd356e0 | I expect more than two words, as it sounds as if you are just paying lip service instead of being sincere. I also expect you to say on the vairiuos deletion pages that you jumped to a conclusion on and attempted to skew the discussion via your attack. I really find your behsviour childish and I am starting to wonder if you are some fourteen year old with little life expericnce trying to act important, as it is suggested by your patterns of behaviour here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fedbe7a36c324233 | "
Congrats!
And you know why. ;) Welcome to the world of domestic servitude! ''''''wordsdeeds " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fedcce180acfed7a | It may mean that the color is recommended by OSHA for use by people working near construction sites. It is probably a loud, fluorescent color. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fedf1756ff555a54 | Your legal threats
I have requested that your account be blocked indefinitely at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_by_Milomedes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee000517ffbdc02 | "
Administrators Abusing their Privileges
Mate1 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee0caa8260e6d14 | "
Etiquette
Your statement ""I keep my conviction that I'm on the truth: that you two are members of some racist organization"" on this edit directed toward User:Dark Tichondrias is an accusation that two users are racists, making it against Wikipedia's policy on etiquette. Wikipedia's policy on etiquette suggests to not accuse other users of being racist.
WP:Wikiettiquete says:
Terms like ""racist,"" ""sexist"" or even ""poorly written"" make people defensive. This makes it hard to discuss articles productively. If you have to criticize, you must do it in a polite and constructive manner.
This seems to be the issue of dispute. Yet racism is at the heart of this discussion, specially because DT and Thulean are percieved by all the rest as people with such an agenda.
I'm pondering to start a project called WP:Honesty: Say things clear (without falling in insults), don't hide in word games, don't make threats that make no sense (bravados), don't edit capriciously ignoring the discussion, etc. Play fair and demand others to do the same.
You pretend that I'm making ad hominem attacks, yet I'm just pointing out who's misbehaving and why. Something that is obvious to all, including you two.
If you would be even minimally sincere you would not be trying to corner me against arbitrarily selected Wikipolicies but you would have protested your innocence, first of all. You are just playing legalism.
If you want me to refrain from denouncing your behaviour and your agenda the least your could do is to is to protest your innocence, to explain your reasons, to pretend at least that you are not racist. But you only make attacks ad hominem against my honesty and sincerity.
Keep it that way. I don't mind.
Personal Attacks
Please refrain from personal attacks which you made in Talk:White_people. Or next time you will be reported to WP:DP.
I am not making any personal attacks. I honestly think you are a nazi (or close equivalent, if you want to dwell in the small letter and word twists). You haven't even bothered in denying it, so why should I think otherwise.
If you think that stating that is a personal attack, please say why. I don't think that openly declaring the (apparent) truth is any personal attack but just that: stating facts, so we can discuss honestly.
What is being discussed in that article's talk page is largely ideological and some people of certain ideology (you and DarkTichondrias) are trying to manipulate the participative process of Wikipedia in your favor, editing ignoring the consensus. I honestly believe it is my duty to fight such behaviour and defend the neutrality of Wikipedia. And I will do it.
If you still arent satisfied, you can ask a request for investigation, but I must warn it can well backfire.
Of course I wont dignify your silly personal attacks with a response. And you repeated your personal attack with your response. I'll be reporting you.
Excellent.
Calling another editor a nazi, regardless of whether you think it is true, is completely unacceptable. If you continue, you may be blocked for personal attacks. Please find a more civil way to discuss your concerns about the article. babelfish
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.
Stop being hyporcitic and stop spamming my talk page Thulean. I have enough with what Shell Kinney said.
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. By saying things like ""Nevertheless I will keep protecting the article against unilateral harassment by Thu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee22ae398af3b4b | "
Betrayal (1929 film)
...and about your edits to Betrayal (1929 film)... You got me thinking. The information you questioned was within the sources, but I simply had a citation in the wrong place. Read Hal Erickson's first sentence here where he addresses both your concerns when he writes that the film is ""a part-talkie which represented the only screen teaming of Hollywood's Gary Cooper and Germany's Emil Jannings."" '''' MICHAEL Q.'' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee521291062036e | Busy here, I'm afraid. (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee623825d55d2b1 | Natalie Ogle is an accomplished British Actress. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fee9d2a94394dc8e | Hey fluffy, your pretty fluffy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feeb2941ff6e09ee | "
And another
Searching for the Impossible Dream, Staging the Impossible Script Banjeboi " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feee6975c6d8ff92 | I am interested in you turning up here at this irrelevant corner of Wikipedia in order to score a silly point so that WMC can repost it on his page as an example of 'hypocrisy'. So that there's no confusion, I think BLP concerns on user talk pages is complete nonsense, whereas BLP concerns in the public biography pages of living people is very serious. I am glad you understand the difference. Thanks for dropping by. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feeeb22143afced0 | Well, I've just wasted an hour and a half of my life trying to track down any information at all about the K. Banerjee Centre (not center) of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies, and I don't think I could even write a two sentence stub on it. Something with this name verifiably exists, is verifiably associated with the University of Allahabad and verifiably publishes work on oceanography (see here, for example)... and I still know absolutely nothing else about it. What's it's role within the university? Is it a department in itself, or a loose grouping of academics from other departments? How many people work for it? The university's own website says nothing about it. It gets 35 Google hits, half of them Wikipedia mirrors, half one line mentions on an address or CV. It doesn't even seem to have a homepage. Half of the grotesque number of external links in the article have nothing to do with the centre. There aren't even enough primary sources online to write a meaningful stub. I think it might have to go to AfD after all. I'll try to write the nom tomorrow, but for the moment I have to go and rest my poor brain, which has been fried from reading too much bad prose. ''''''Balderdash and piffle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
feeef8c3abecf143 | the words of support. bd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.