id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
0144f059302a9965
":I concur with the The Elements of Style and N5iln, the possessive should be ""Jobs's"" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01465fd903558524
Lots of that other shit does not have a category for themselves. Terri does.
1
0
1
0
0
0
01481fe714da3c95
" I agree with both of the above comments, which I think point the direction for a real consensus. Anyone who shouts ""it needs no proof"", like Zereshk, could probably benefit from reading out core policies, WP:V and WP:NOR carefully. | Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0148ad0e3b849181
" Your ""indisputable facts"" aren;t. Wikipedia requires solid reliable sourcing, not what any editor asserts are ""ndisputable facts."" Kindly remove the Breivik material as I fear that the ""edit war"" is on your side. Cheers. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
015b3d713ac21e5d
Oh so it's you who wants the considerable amount of harm then is it? You fucking cretin. You seriously think I'm going to stop vandalising just because you block me? I have a MASSIVE range of IPs and you will never block them all. I am never going to stop either. Hahaha 94.2.133.200
1
0
1
0
1
0
015d3d1eebc34568
Yur making Wikipedia sound like Israel. Only without the halva.
0
0
0
0
0
0
015f3e2d23d154b0
OTRS ticket 2009051010000428 I draw your attention to the Boze Hadleigh entry Talk page which has a post from one 'Monkeyzpop' questioning your recent deletion, to which they have received no reply. Given the facts cited in the deleted section, I too am puzzled, and request that you illuminate us on your reasoning at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boze_Hadleigh.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0166b03410fa0d98
fowler fowler its not about who knows more of history,its about a community and we cant ignore what others say,and dont think that whatever other people say is false,cause confidence is good but overconfidence is not good!and see if u are writing about a history of community then write about their present also!and include some modern sources,and be neutral!u havent included jatt idols like Bhagat singh,Udham singh!and Abhinav bindra a gold medalist at Olympics in shooting,Yuvraj singh indian crickter,Harbhajan singh crickter,and Milkha singh gold meadlist in 1958 and 1962 olympics in 200m and 400m! one more thing its written that jats used to practice widow remarriage but they used to practice only when it was allowed after reforms in the society and so what if they used to practice it afterall it was an evil practice,and let me tell u that even rajputs started practicing widow remarriage and rajputs and jats made their own rules cause they had power brahmins were only preists they had no actual power!cause kings and warriors have always more power than preiests!
0
0
0
0
0
0
01687a0352f54754
even if we hate furfags and llolis and kid fuckers
1
0
1
0
0
1
016aca6798c57281
Accusations of sockpuppetry To whom it may concern, I would like to express my disgust at being accused of sockpuppetry. The accusation made by ChrisCh is baseless simply because more than myself have pointed out their objections to his extreme censorship of the Padua College wikipedia listing. I would further like to add my anger that a Wikipedia newcomer, Freedomfighter1112, has been indefinitely blocked for expressing his point-of-view. The actions taken by and subsequently I feel are actually in violation of Wikipedia's policy of not attacking the newcomers. It should be assumed that, in good faith, that Freedomfighter1112 would hope to assist the Wikipedia community in a positive way; however, with the actions taken by the two users mentioned previously, he/she has been prohibited from being able to accomplish this desire. We must remember that everyone makes mistakes, and mistakes are meant to be forgiven - especially in the case of a person's first edit. I would like to say only once - I DO NOT KNOW, OR HAVE ANY CONNECTION WITH FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 AND THAT THE ACCUSATION OF SOCKPUPPETRY IS BASELESS AND THE INDEFINITE BLOCK PLACED AGAINST FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 SHOULD BE OVERTURNED IMMEDIATELY. Sincerely Yours, Australia2world Australia2world
0
0
0
0
0
0
016f929ca882f152
Unlike some people, I read the Frankish Annals, Chronicles of the Priest of Doclea and Of managing an Empire, and I enjoyed in every single one of them. This Red Croatia most probably never existed after all (as a Croatian state) The other two historical sources are much more acurrate. We have the originals of them, and only a copy is preserved of the Priest's statement. But I have made careful studies, and made conclusions from all three (and agreed that all are completly correct) I will display it here soon.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0177211a942a8f2c
" Just shut up you boring old crap. Nobody even likes you. Also, WTF is all the damn ""copyright pics?"" WTF is that?? God, you really should get off the Internet & study you uneducated dufus. Anyway, it's hard to communicate with somebody as stupid as YOU. Also, why should I do what you want me to do? I can do whatever I want you big loser.User:Pic Business "
1
0
1
0
1
0
0179b5c6929ce80f
" When I first heard of ""coldplay,"" I thought it was the name of a sandwich, like come cold cut corn beef with rye. Imagine how shocked I am to learn that this cold sandwich consisting of castrated schoolboys is pretending to be a talented music group. lol Yet you bring a champion of cold cuts to dispute music with me? A champion of cold cuts is going to argue about Soviet Russia with me? Spare me this insult, please, and you know you brought this on yourself by throwing away my smart music edits of the past. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
017b45898f2306c6
The GPUs only support Direct3D 11.0 and therefore DirectX 11.0 ONLY.
0
0
0
0
0
0
017c03124f130491
This is a real entry. The link shows that Mike was indeed make the new President of Pioneer Newspapers.
0
0
0
0
0
0
017fcee1d58c40dd
" Turks of Turkey and Azeris did not ""gain more European appearance"", they simply ""melted"" and blended with locals and had no larger genetic impact, but linguistic. So nowadays, designation of Turkic would be more appropriate in this latter sense, i.e. to designate linguistic groups, ethinicity-wise it makes little senseSahib-qiron ."
0
0
0
0
0
0
018d2dc5fe91fd4d
WHEN YOU COME HERE TO SAY NAUGHTY NAUGHT. GO F.U.C.K YOURSELVES.
1
1
1
0
1
0
018d745e82b88445
Omer S. Yasin(born February 20, 1996 in Erbil, Kurdistan) is an Iraqian computer programmer and IT. He is studying and working in computer science. In 2001 started school in 2007 finished primary school. In 2008 started secondary school and in 2010 finished school. In 2011 started high school and 2013 finished high school. When he was 13 he started working on software programs. His dream was to built a data center and working at a professional company of computer science. As he was young, he wasn't to smart at school ,but he is smart at computer software. His father is an mechanical professor at sallahadin university. Prof. Safeen Y. Ezeddin. He was born in 1961. Omer has two brothers. Arsan Safeen and Ali Safin. Omer is one of the best-known entrepreneurs of the personal computer revolution.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01948aeb0aee6e51
Gene Hunt Please do not add external links to avoid to articles, like you did to the Gene Hunt article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0195a08f5b15ba8a
" Luka Magnotta Does sensational speculation and lurid tabloid journalism - however widely covered - really trump WP:BLPCRIME? At best this should be an article about a murder, noting that Magnotta is the prime suspect. Chan "
0
0
0
0
0
0
019860f4fd0ca455
" Short-term instability - possible mistake ""What is known specifically about the IPK is that it exhibits a short-term instability of about 30 µg over a period of about a month in its after-cleaned mass.[18]"" - from what I think is the BIPM's source for this, http://www.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/Monographie1990-1-EN.pdf, it seems to be more like 4 µg over a period of about four months for the IPK (figure 14 in that document). The proceedings linked in footnote 18 give no source for the much higher value."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0199dea88c6102f9
Well, that's fair. Charity is always good. Money and morality don't have to be mutually exclusive. It's just that before some jerk invented the idea of comparative value of material goods, human beings primarily existed by charity. Morality was a given, and money was not needed. Mutual interdependence. And life was good. There is nothing to steal when no one really owns anything. And there is nothing to lose when people recognize that life is a flowing impermanent thing anywayour lives are on loan to us from the universe. Nothing to hang on to, no need for property. Now we live in an age where anything can be turned into a commodity, and most wealth is controlled by a few. So, how can we be free when our lives revolve around money?
0
0
0
0
0
0
019aaeaa67877a0e
" This is often problematic. I've read these guidelines carefully several times, and there is a specific reference to the name ""Williams"" in the second one, but it's not a hard-and-fast rule, just a description of customary usage. It seems that, in both guidelines, the way the possessive form sounds best when pronounced is a good guideline. See MOS:POSS and Apostrophe#Possessive apostrophe, particularly these sections: Basic rule (singular nouns) Singular nouns ending with an ""s"" or ""z"" sound. See the second paragraph after the two bulleted items for specific discussion of the name Williams. Would you say ""Williams' wife"" or ""Williams's wife"", with the second one pronounced ""Williamses wife""? I don't know which one I would say; I've never known anyone with that last name. There is a small consideration: that ""Williams' wife"" sounds the same as ""William's wife"", with the second example being a man whose first name is William, but I don't know if that's a problem, especially in an article where it is clear that it is the man's last name. With ""Williams's wife"", it is clear beyond a doubt that his last name is ""Williams"". What do you think? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
019bfb44d557058c
Ah, but is there relevance? If Sumple still supports his previous views, then there can be no defamation (no doubt he'll be proud to have a wider airing of his opinions), and if he doesn't, then he only has to retract in order to rectify the damage that his publically-stated views have caused. I for one am very offended. I feel it my duty to bring to the attention of the entire Wikipedian community the potential bias that might be introduced into edited articles. He only has to retract for us all to breathe a little easier.
0
0
0
0
0
0
019d7e9ab7f3a4b8
yes!! == That's right TW hero! What you ain't got no woman to take care of instead of reverting vandalism on obscure wiki pages? ARE YOU A LOSER (seriously)??
0
0
0
0
1
0
01a07650da510e5a
" Talk: WikiProject Comics In the interest of everyone who watches the page for ongoing discussions, please stop making irrelevant, minor changes to the page simply so that you can ramble in an edit summary. People watch that page in the interest of relevant discussion. Also, it appears that for a few days you added two paragraphs to the page that didn't add to the discussion, only to revert them. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics is on the watchlist of numerous editors, so if you could stop crowding it with nonsense that would be nice. Cheers. It wasn't nonsense. A topic was brought up regarding the contents of a certain story arc, and since it extensively quoted my story, character archetypes, scenes, etcetera, I very honestly filled in what the thematics were, as I am chronically upfront and very impulsive, but also tend to rethink and fix things I do that might have been a bad idea. Some of the involved people (or at least Kurt Parker used some of their catchphreases regarding me, whereas I remember Joe Quesada mentioning that he considers ""Spidey"" his favourite fan several years ago), censored it. I do have a problem with that the ones responsible didn't just talk with me directly from the start and explain the situation clearly, rather than attacking, and then didn't even have the decency to actually stand for the very statistically unlikely yet real ridiculously extreme hate-tirade against me. I mean, I as good as always stand for anything I do, and it is all comparatively extremely trivial. Yet I've apparently got lots of western comics crossover, movies, tv series, computer games, books, and manga inexplicably focusing extensively on me in some kind of vendetta for a long time, which is extremely confusing for somebody literalminded with limited sensory filters like myself. One obscure story to process and put horrible input I had been exposed to behind me (well, 30000 visits counts as obscure in my book), and almost completely random Wikipedia nad tvtropes edits somehow equalled a global media campaign reaching hundreds of millions, while declaring me a genocidal lunatic... My ""does not compute blinkers"" have gone haywire for quite a while now to say the least... That said, please quit doing it, regardless of what imaginary pop-culture vendetta you're talking about. If you can't control making edits that do nothing but serve as a soapbox, go somewhere else. Otherwise, it's like someone who can't control their bladder going to a water park. It just causes problems. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01a335e6946db162
Logo Is it me or does Supernova's logo look suspiciously like the Starbrand?
0
0
0
0
0
0
01ad69c1696b78b1
Clearly you don't understand wikipedia policies. OTHERSTUFFEXIST, GHITS, ISNOTAMEMORIAL, and now WP:DRV. I didn't circumvent AFD, you and the recreator of this article did. You didn't go to DRV. Again has changed to this incident since the AFD to make it notable. All that has been done is the article has been rewritten.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01ae8c25c4d25e69
Removing my comments Removing my comments I have made shall lead to you getting indefintely blocked - 89.242.19.188
0
0
0
0
0
0
01b5004ba47dc329
It's a real thing My nephew is a WMU student. Everyone is being hush hush. Don't accuse me of vandalism just because you're not informed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01b752bac64845a9
I just did. I hadn't realised he'd re-added those references early and messed up the bottom of the page (why does he say they are from the talk page). He is adding OR and editing against consensus. I've got some stuff to add to it, I was working on Ball-zephon and got distracted. Maybe not until tomorrow, meanwhile, as I say, he is editing against consensus.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01d3bb4cd13d4710
" Speedy deletion of Omgomg Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01d6bcd6807d6e63
Thanks for the change - 'absence of technical knowledge/Michael Portillo's Bradshaw' or I would have done it myself.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01d6f16d95ca61fa
I agree with the previous assessment about that swine Bill Connolley. He blocked me earlier this week for doing next to nothing. I was just attempting to make a page better, and he abused his power to reinforce his personal point of view. Among administrators, he has some of the worst judgement on all of wikipedia, and I regard him as a swine of the lowest order.
1
0
0
0
0
0
01daabf1e7580aa3
" Pure Gold Jewellers I have moved your article to your userspace so you may work on it at your own pace before resubmitting it to AfC. It is located here. As far as the article itself is concerned, here are some problems which should be corrected before continuing. Sources Your sources are sometimes trivial and do not contribute to the overall article. Trivial mention of PGJ, more focused on gold and the industry in general Trivial mention of the company, focuses again more on industry and economy. More of a press release. Trivial mention of award. Trivial Does nothing more than provide source for what I've mentioned to be puffery About owner, not company. Trivial PR Trivial PR Quality of article Again, things like ""Best Customer Service"" awards are usually considered puffery and are not suited to encyclopaedic articles. Put simply, this article needs to be more than just a list of company awards. That alone cannot sustain an article. (talk|contrib) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01dc551c401a3f15
" I concur with the above analysis, as I have already said before. The crux of the above issue simply refers to the fact that Nicky Bird wrote that in Beever's book ""Statistics proliferate, and are unverifiable"", and the text inserted into the Wikipedia article said that this same estimate ""has been questioned by Nicky Bird"". As noted, at one point Nicky Bird's article was directly quoted so that readers could understand his viewpoint in his own words. YMB29 could possibly have been sanctioned for many things, but I still can't understand how an indefinite ban for misrepresentation was justified. I wonder if YMB29's ban can be reduced to ""time served""? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01e3225e0443a913
Wait a minute.threaten? Onewordpostguy
0
0
0
0
0
0
01ed32c427a561f5
AND HAVING A FUCKIN' BITCH ASS DAY'''
1
0
1
0
1
0
01f1e7856ef3e305
" Anthro wikiproject? Hi, I thought you might be interested in helping me set up a wikiproject for anthropology. If so, could you sign up at our entry on the list of proposed projects, and on the ? Thanks. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01f3112367593722
European American reflects nationality, while the issue here is race. Much of the article seems to be pro-Connerly and is intended to prove his detractors wrong.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01f81806e27ef8ab
"Under section ""Rewrote lead"". Let's discuss the edits there. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
01f9870c7c32447f
Manger's Don't forget to add the manager's for the matches: Ranjin Singh managed The Great Khali Santino Marella managed Beth Phoenix Layla managed Willam Regal Manu managed Cody Rhodes and Tony Atlas managed Mark Henry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0201d12c01474ac0
Please do not post to WP:AFD pages after closure. ''''''
0
0
0
0
0
0
0208692f20a26bb5
Sorry for the late reply, they are all off now.
0
0
0
0
0
0
021007a19663bb4a
(UTC) This article is superbly written and strikes a perfect balance between what should be in versus what is appropriate to leave out. I very rarely reference Wikipedia as a primary source for teaching purposes but this article is exceptional. The EVM learning resources article on my Web site links to it as of May 2010. 16:24, 27 May 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0213ac1834b7ccc6
"I changed the info about the Gould recording to ""Book 1"" from ""Book 2"". 90.184.202.246 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02165c9f5c8391df
" Matt Hi there. Yes his blocking would prevent him from making a statement for that, to the best of my knowledge. If you need his input then I'll unblock him, but if he continues his personal attacks then he runs the risk of being blocked again. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
021691e29375ae74
The problem is Gamaliel is a power drunk Sociopath admin with delusions of grandeur. You can not question Gamaliel because He has tools and you don't. (from some one with history with Gamaliel. (For Gamaliel from me... Looks like the BERRY O is getting a real hot start in ruining the country. See this link and and see the love for BERRY and his wisdom. BERRY SHARE THE WEALTH
0
0
0
0
0
0
02169fe6f7b3e0b0
" >Also, if you say that ballistic charts everywhere, yet you continue to fail to provide one as a reference Yeah, and cite from Ballistics Chart (which is every where, in this case in FM 3-05.222) is product of my imagination. >Please assume good faith, don't insult other editors, and provide a ref for the changes you wish to make. I already showed ""good faith"" by correcting bullshit free of charge. What ""good faith"" showed you? - Start reverting correct edits while having no idea about subject. Do you think your ""work"" helps wikipedia? 69.141.140.192 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
021993056b27d3e4
Just FYI, on the French wiki, we finally chose to talk about proto-State. Palestine has numerous features of a State (starting by recognition) but lack some others (eg a define territory and a control of this). It is a State de jure -partly- but not really de facto -with some exception-. So it is a State in building: a proto-State. Some sources (in French) use that wording. I don't know in English.
0
0
0
0
0
0
021e7d91b436de59
"*:*:*Or we can do a search on ""the Wilhelmstrasse"" and get 846 hits. I congratulate Stefán on finding a method to separate the sheep from the goats; now if he would only use honesty as well as ingenuity. PMAnderson "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02220cdc26563ed0
If people see all the dollar signs they will know Wikipedia is no fan of Microsoft's evil methods of making money by cheating others with inferior software and destroying competitors. If you are one of the people who actually writes Wikipedia, I suggest you add information to the Microsoft article, about how they have cheated people. I know many people have their edits reverted quickly, so I'm not going to bother spending lots of time on edits which will be reverted quickly. My method is fast and effecient - it just takes me a few minutes, and by hitting 20 pages, by the time someone reverts everything, there'll be some passing readers who will see my work and see how Microsoft cheats people. I'm going to check with SingNet whether they offer shared IPs - if so, I'll sign up for an account with them. I have a friend who uses AOL who would be interested in helping me with this. Perhaps if we have 10 ISPs which use dynamic IPs or IPs shared by thousands of people, and we keep doing this, anonymous editing will have to be completely prohibited. I once edited constructively with an account, and I know everything that's going wrong with Wikipedia - including allowing anonymous editing. If doing this will help you and other Wikipedians open their eyes to the problems here, I will stop. Signed, the cousin of the poster on the Village Pump Misc they didn't believe.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0224f0c3a81dd17e
" How would you kill yourself? == This article has some good methods, but it could really be expanded with more original and effective ideas. Put your own suggestions here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.117.113 That would be original research and it is not allowed. Please do not add any personal ideas here as they will be reverted.  fan ~~ Well, no. Everyone could tell how they would commit suicide if they had to. After that, we could find verifiable sources with Google, and then it wouldn't be original research. So, how would you do it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.117.113 This is not for how people would commit suicide. If you have something that is not in the article then find a reliable source and put it in or bring it up for discussion here. Don't just add opinions on how someone could commit suicide without a reliable source here. If that is done I will remove it.  fan ~~ Actually, this talk page is here for opinions. As said, only suggestions with reliable sources would be added to the article. How would you kill yourself, if you had to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.117.113 I disagree with the ""Original Research"" rules of Wikipedia, if Einstein was alive and had the idea of relativity and came to Wikipedia to make an article on it, he couldn't because of ""original research"" What's he supposed to do? Build a website, then reference that website as his source? It's ridiculous to say the least. I've had many cases where pure logical reasoning was removed because it was ""original research"" like, the fact that Barrack Obama is not African American but that he is mixed race. Wikipedia is more like a Nazi-Encyclopedia. But anyways, I'd suicide by Sodium thiopental ""better known as Sodium Pentothal"" 50.47.157.152 =="
0
0
0
0
0
0
0233d16cfc2758f8
This is 100% accurate!
0
0
0
0
0
0
02360d8fc83c70a8
" ArchivesPlease do not edit archived pages. If you want to react to a statement made in an archived discussion, please make a new header on THIS page. Archives: Archive 1 - Archived on December 8, 2006 Archive 2 - Archived on November 23, 2007 Ragusa- Dubrovnik- has never been in Italy! This article's statement in the part of ""Maratime Republics"" claiming that Ragusa was in Italy and therefore implying that it was an Italian republic is clearly a mistake. One just needs to go into the Sponza palace, the Ragusian state archive in Dubrovnik and see any of the official documents. The laws regarding inner policy are clearly stated in Croatian: Those regarding foreign policy are written both in Croatian and Italian. All of the ruling families of Ragusa from Sorkocevic to Gucetic to Restic etc were Croatian. The greatest Ragusian poet and writer Ivan Gundulic, an aristocrat and one of the rulers, famous for his book ""Suze sina razmetnoga"", was one of the greatest Croatian nationalists. Source: ""Dubrovnik, a history"", written by Robin Harris 2006. According to the Robert Harris book Malta was independent until 1808 when Napoleon annexed it. According to Harris Dubrovnik with it's fleet of 700.000 tons (surpassing Venice in 1660) was the main hated rival of Venice in the Adriatic and always resisted the invasion plans of Venice. The last Venitian rector was sent home packing- politely but firmly- in 1351. According to Harris the recto packed his belongings in a hurry. Some reflections on this issue are necessary First, it is necessary a reflection on the very concepts of Nation and State as these two terms are commonly considered near-synonyms and therefore used interchangeably. They have, instead different meanings. The term Italy refers to booth meanings. Italy as State was born in XIX cent, but Italy as Natiom is much older. Almost true, Ragusa never belonged to Italy-State except the Napoleon's Kingdom of Italy (1808-1809), but was seen for some centuries a part of Italy-Nation in the beginning of its birth process. Today Ragusa/Dubrovink, as well as Split and other Dalmatian towns, are out of Italy-State and out of Italy-Nation as well, they belong both to Croatia-Nation and to Croatia-State. On the other hand Lugano (Switzerland) and San Marino (independent republic) are out of Italy-State and still part of Italy-Nation. I suggest the book: L. TOMAZ, ""Il confine d'Italia in Istria e Dalmazia. Duemila anni di storia"" and the SSRN working paper: ARNALDO MAURI, Historical, Geopolitical and Economic Factors affecting State and Nation Boundaries: Foreword on Italy's Borders in Istria and Dalmatia., Of course, Ragusa as port city had a multiethnic population: besides Italians also Croats, Vlachs, Serbs, Albanians. Similar situations could be found in Istanbul, Alexandria, Izmir, Odessa. To be the birthplace of poets or outstanding men is insignificant. Tommaseo was born in Dalmatia, as many other great Italians, Garibaldi and Massena were born in Nice, the Greek poet Kavafis in Alexandria. Venice was rival of Ragusa, but was also rival of Genoa on the sea and of Milan on the mainland; also this point is insignificant to the discussion on Ragusa belonging to Italy-Nation in past centuries.87.9.19.187 Romanians in 2007/2008 I think now that Romanians are the largest minority in Italy, someone should add this fact from this year. If you can give a reliable source that says this, go ahead and add it (including a reference to the source). However merely ""thinking"" that it's true is not a reliable source.  | Talk From BBC
0
0
0
0
0
0
023a497ed43f615a
Thank you for the response, I won't edit the article any more. I understand your points, but as someone with a degree in both Astronomy and Physics, I still find this section irrelevant. It detracts from an otherwise nice article. If other Wikipedia users don't agree with me, that's fine. You can argue that the Dr. Who edits are encyclopedic, but they are definitely not scientific in nature. Maybe that doesn't matter, but that would be a shame, since this is an article about science.
0
0
0
0
0
0
023ef5158397ee05
I see a block log in your account. Just seeing it make me laugh, Mr. Perfect, perfect no more.
0
0
0
0
0
0
023f3d9c358a464a
Eat Shit Eat shit and die arseface mutherlicker137.240.136.80
1
0
1
0
1
0
024af90dcf3d9ec2
Billy Bragg It's a pity the photo you took of Billy turned out blurred. What happened? It appears you were too close to him when you took it or he made a sudden movement. The people in the background aren't blurred at all. He looks much older than his age; just compare him to older people like Sting.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02526d2f0b73abe4
Have the balls to respond you little Hawaiian vag. I know you probably won't and just wait for someone else to but there's no need for you to smell like stinky tuna.
1
0
1
0
1
0
0253196b8a98f4d0
I agree, I have questioned the reliability of The Telegraph as a source, at least for matters regarding Corbyn and the Labour Party. It has shown itself to disregard basic standards of journalism and honesty. It appears as little more than the in-house newsletter of the Conservative Party, and a poor one at that. How can the World Socialist Web Site considered an unreliable source for biogs, but the Torygraph suitable?
0
0
0
0
0
0
025790901519726d
I've fixed this. (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
025f563993f26d64
Hey you cunt armchair lawyer Do you like it? Sitting in your mom's basement trying to act like you are know it all? Go fuck yourself you stupid cunt bag.
1
0
1
0
1
0
02651cdb23ac2b2f
Does your name happen to be Alex Dempsey, and do you live in Mountain View, Leopardstown, Ireland?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0268d7637fca9d45
Why subway? Why is this called a subway, when it's an el?
0
0
0
0
0
0
026eaadeef6ae8ae
And could someone possibly add on a picture of Cena's Custom U.S and WWE titles. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02754b59eabe8b86
I do not feel that this is simple promotion of an entity. This wiki is informative for anyone interested in Stoller and his work.
0
0
0
0
0
0
027636894bd338fc
It's mostly the other way round: research on various types of synesthesia are part of the research on many major topics in psychology and neuropsychology. This article needs space for a brief description of this ongoing research in its own right and in own sections, in addition to a section with research exclusively on synesthesia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0278ad41c38a2736
|currentstatus=GA |topic=Sports and recreation }} {{WikiProject Pittsburgh|class=GA
0
0
0
0
0
0
027a91f271a44d67
Also add: Halford - Strange World (live) Kamelot - Flight of Icarus I wish I still had the MP3 of Halford doing Strange World ='(
0
0
0
0
0
0
027d12f9fa27e24c
Your Opinion, Our View
0
0
0
0
0
0
0283712d10c17121
the attention of American film makers.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02894f4fa54fce84
" Hi again Bo [will just use the abbreviation for speed], Not much time at the moment since I'm in the midst of a project but wanted to respond to a few points. First of all, thanks for your kind, even-toned replies to my questions and expressions of irritation. I DO think that WikiP should have an avenue of complaint for users from my recent experience, it seems contributors can get stuck in an endless loop of Admins (or whatever titles you and your editorial colleagues have), never reaching someone with the authority to resolve complaints. You and others have referred vaguely to the ""process"" of Copyvio review, but I have no idea who does that, when they do it, or how to reach them to defend my position/claims. 1. I sometimes find a ""You have a message waiting"" notice. How is that genrated? Do you get this same notice when I post on your User page? Is there a way to send a messaage directly to you so it won't be visible to the world e.g. if I needed to provide you an email address or something I didn't want posted here? 2. Regarding Crapsey. I did indeed check various sources in writing the article. And if you read the EB citation and my piece, you'll see that mine is quite different, not at all a sentence-by-sentence paraphrase. It differs in style and wording from the outset to the end and contains far more detail than EB. Moreover, Crapsey is a local legend in Rochester, and I had no need to consult Brittanica I don't know how you folks access EB, but I stopped using it years ago when they went from a free to a pay service that only provides ""teaser"" articles that are virtually useless. Thus, the entry non-members get for Crapsey is the following truncated info: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9125441 We have never been EB ""trial"" members or subscribers; it would appear that you folks at WikiP do have some sort of membership, however. Is that correct? 3. Regarding Sock Puppetting, I was adapting your own WikiP term for those who use ""dummy"" accounts (or have friends act in concert with them) to insure they get the posting they want. It was beginning to appear that your colleagues were teaming up in a Revert War. In fact, they did just that in another article we posted about area poet William Heyen they kept Copyvio-ing it, though in fact it was written by us for our own journal, Exit Online. When I pointed this out, I was told, in effect, ""Oh yeah? Well, prove it!"""" I have no idea what sort of ""proof"" one can offer for owning someone one has posted to their own web site (or any other web site for that matter). More to the point, THEY offered no suggestions as to how one might ""prove it."" If you have an email address for someone at WikiP who oversees this sort of stuff, then let me know and we'll be happy to contact him/her. 4. As for ""my article,"" I was referring to the fact that it's mine by virtue of the fact that I authored it. In fact, your own guidelines specifically state that the author of each edit is the author and has only granted a GFDL license, so that author can be said to be the owner of that particular edit. That could even be the whole article. For this reason, the authors don't have to comply with the GFDL requirements for their own writing - the GFDL license doesn't override their own rights to use their own work. They can also license it to any number of others under any other licenses they choose, since that's one of the rights authors have. 5. Thanks for your candor over concerns about EB suits over copyright. Maybe EB has folks that spend their days doing nothing but monitor WikiP, though I somehow doubt it since they would not have access to the same ""new posting"" info that you and your colleagues use to monitor postings. It would take an army of staff even to randomly check WikiP listings. 6. As for creating an account, in fact, my colleagues and I do have accounts and would, indeed, like the ""credit"" for our efforts. However, given the recent unpleasant incidents we've encountered that include threats of being blocked/blacklisted, I'm sure you can understand why anonymity seems preferable for the moment. 7. I'll have to check into templates. I suspected you might be using some sort of boilerplate, and this is precisely why using forms can be so dangerous. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0290eeff7f08d8f5
lets end it now its over gt is watever you think it is period. good night guys. User:Big foot123456789
0
0
0
0
0
0
02938f7bcad6bcef
Good point, I don't expect to see the article deleted so I won't bother. It's clear that wikipedia is not a truly representative forum and that it has been taken over by hacks, zealots and vandals who have become adminsitrators, largely it would appear (based on Connolly's bio) due to the fact that they don't have productive employment obligations elsewhere. I, fortunately do have such obligations and expect to be out yelled, screamed, reverted and controlled. Ultimately however, this will not alter the fact that you are *wrong* in your fundamental philosophy, and this new fascism will ultimately die as the other forms have. The issue really is how many people will be harmed by these fascists that are using global weapon as their latest justification for increasing the state's control over our lives, following racial arguments, nationalist arguments, and worker's rights arguments. Lol, I've been so busy on other things that I've even forgotten how to insert my signature here...!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0298458fbfc2f21b
"The ""hint"" that Wiki wants to remain ""STUPID"" about 2012. It's gloriously clear. What I've been hinting at is way more important. MARDYKS 67.164.149.77 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
029904882c51a9ab
I look forward to reading your re-write. Oh yes that quote is from the film Sneakers.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0299b7557fa43c22
Re: Solicity for deletion I have no earthly idea what your post on my talk page is about. Are you saying you want me to delete the user page
0
0
0
0
0
0
02a09d603b2326ef
I cannot look up what IP the comments were attributed to (I cannot review history now) but my IP is: - 216.239.128.2 (3 for NS.2). I did not log off yesterday but I WAS logged off today when I checked in, so it is possible somehow I became logged off. To check my IP, do a whois on: - aimultimedia.com. As I have never logged off since joining Wikipedia I did not know this allows you to still edit but screws up your signature.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02a401b92814513b
The Best Remix for P.I.M.P. . . . . .I DONT KNO WHAT U HERD ABOUT ME BUT A BITCH CANT GET A BLUNT UP OUT OF ME I DROP SLOBZZ WHERE IM FROM AND IMMA G CUZZ IMMA MUTHA FUKKIN C.R.I.P. -Brandon Santiago
1
0
1
0
0
0
02a8fccb894e7bd8
That figures. You're the disruptive one with the POV problems who stalks other Wikipedians.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02a94a1dcdf5b5fd
I tried to write this but some meanie delete it!
0
0
0
0
0
0
02a96e834eaf7f4c
Do a few Islamophobic murders and vandalism need a framework article? The notable ones like el-Sherbini have their own pages, and that's enough. But if you got rid of the state persecution here, would what's left really merit a framework article?
0
0
0
0
0
0
02ad290bc68b3659
" September 2010 Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Carbon monoxide poisoning. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''''''''' (Contact) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02b0cdd372df5dff
You reactionary MRA gamergators have nothing reliable to disprove the article. The Mary Sue falls under Wiki's list of sourceable websites. If Brianna Wu states that Samus is a transwoman, which she has WITH evidence, then that's what the article will include. The only way I'll stop is if the creator himself will step up and say that no she isn't. Until then, your reactionary dogpiling won't help you this time.2602:304:CFE0:FA09:E036:C835:6DE5:C
0
0
0
0
0
0
02b38833baddcb3f
" I'm struggling to see what the current dispute is about after my enforced spell in the slammer. Karbinski argues for ""Philosophy is the science that studies the fundamental aspects of the nature of existence in order to provide man with a comprehensive view of life. Major branches of Philosophy include Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Politics, and Aesthetics. The word philosophy is of Ancient Greek origin: φιλοσοφία (philosophía), meaning ""love of knowledge"", ""love of wisdom"""" I prefer a return to the main four branches. Deleting the 'reasoned argument' part is not supported by the sources, of which there are plenty. Philosophy would be a science in the original meaning of 'science' (scientia) but the modern meaning, while not entirely different, has connotations that it would be best to avoid. On whether the philosophy of language belongs in the main branches, that is debateable. My view, given the dominance of the 'Old Logic' (the Categories and On Interpretation) and of the importance of those two to the Metaphysics, I would say it does belong. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02b4014a80f33bd8
"|condo]] to prevent unecessary redirects? - , 2004-04-10t01:00z Not sure the recent edit changing Tyler from ""Anarchist"" to ""Nihilist"" is accurate. Tyler certainly does have a ethos and creed, where as a nihilist does not. His creed can certainly be said to be destruction of the current culture and certainly retrograde in many respects, seeking to return to a simpler subsistence level of existence (i.e. hunter/gatherer) but he definitely has an established ethos and world-view. It is simply contrary to much of modern society. I posit that the edit should be reverted back to anarchist. 17:56, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC) Reader's Digest, Jack/Joe Hey, a few years ago I was reading a really old Reader's Digest and I swear I actually read an article written first person from an organ's point of view. (I don't remember which.) ...and the guy's name was Joe. This was before I read the book, so I just thought it was a really odd coincidence at the time...I can't seem to find the article anymore, though. Does anyone else have any info on this? Was Joe changed to Jack to avoid legal troubles with the original ""Joe's XXXXXX"" author? The author of the book was talking about real stories from Reader's Digest, so you probably did read the same ones he refered to. ""Joe"" is changed to ""Jack"" in the movie because Reader's Digest wasn't willing to allow them to mention it in the film. LGagnon I have a copy of John Pekkanen's article ""I am John's Brain Tumour"", from Reader's Digest (South Africa) 1990-12, volume 137, number 824. Chapter 7 of my copy of Palahniuk's Fight club has ""I am Jane's Uterus. I am Joe's Prostate. [...] I am totally Joe's Gallbladder"", ISBN 0-099-28333-6, Vintage (1997) UK Random House. The English RD sites I searched came up empty. The earliet ""Joe""s I found were two 1974 videos from ""Pyramid Films"". I found that ""Pyramid Media"" credits it to RD . Does anyone have a source of an actual Reader's Digest article with ""Joe""? - , 2004-04-15t22:37z It is mentioned on the commentary for the DVD that Reader's Digest told them not to use ""Joe"". Apperantely they own the copyright somehow. Either way, the narrator in the book does use Joe rather than Jack. And given that the book is the original story, I believe that ""Joe"" should be used more often in the article than ""Jack"" (though ""the narrator"" fits the character's ""name"" more accurately). The article seems to lean too much towards being about the movie, which makes it seem as if it was the original source material instead of the book. It would be best that we keep the article based mainly on the book, with details on the movie where applicable. Otherwise, what we would be doing would be the equivelent of someone making the Lord of the Rings article more about the Peter Jackson movie than JRR Tolkien's work. LGagnon Tyler section We should merge the Tyler Durden section into the characters section. There isn't a need for 2 separate sections on him. As it is it looks redundant and a bit sloppy. Any details that don't fit that section can go into a different one. LGagnon Backstory of the novel I just recently updated the article on Chuck Palahniuk with info on how Fight Club came to be. This is in the first paragraph of the Biography section. I was wondering if anyone thought we should include that info in this article, since it gives the backstory of how it was written. Talk]] 12:00, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) Musical This this for real? I've never heard such a thing, can anyone offer proof? User:KneeLess 4:59, 05 Aug 2004 (UTC) See http://www.playbill.com/news/article/86917.html for more details. Also a recent Guardian interview. 11:17, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC) Movie & Book Balance As I mentioned above at the end of the Reader's Digest, Jack/Joe section, the article is ""biased"" towards the movie (that is, the info for the film is treated as being the primary source instead of the book), and needs to be balanced equally for the book. I have fixed a recent re-write of the plot section (which made it even more biased in favor of the film), but more work could be done to balance the article. I think that fixing this is the most important o
0
0
0
0
0
0
02b40537ede0a800
, I'd really prefer to have nothing at all to do with you
0
0
0
0
0
0
02b9ec349abf8b31
" Style Have a look at WP:FA for model articles. They should be written in a neutral factual way from references, and not contain interpretation by the editor. '''''''''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02bcf2bf1d9a3e28
Hey PM, in regards to User talk:Chocolate cake monster, I have this deja-vu feeling, that I've welcomed someone with a similar name before, an editor who also got indef-blocked immediately. Odd! I'm going to stop welcoming people. It's not as lethal as my nominations for administrator (whoever gets my nod is doomed, doomed!), but I don't feel good about it. Maybe it's time to stop and watch Alton Brown. Keep up the good work!
0
0
0
0
0
0
02c198b03a671f51
" i just reread what i wrote above and i sound thoroughly unpleasant. sorry. i meant my tone to be that of ""chummy banter"", not rudeness. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02c3bff36ea621d0
How to edit big topics like Eminem? How do you? ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
02cab8870936c53f
21:26, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
02cac64258f5fecb
" Ahem... I had expected that you would read the documentation page on before using it. Anyways, you should use instead of just sticking there. Also, make sure to link to the notifications in the ""Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request"" section. Also, you are over 200% of the word limit - please trim. Respectfully - '''''' (t / c / ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02cae10355079280
dear editor, further, infact all constructive edits were retained by secret of success, irrespective of sockpuppet infact I have contributed latest info on this article. ( ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
02caef7b68c6f292
" Oh... okay. I was kind of hoping there would only be one name that was a ""true"" J.D. Sing your songThe bird's seeds "
0
0
0
0
0
0
02cbcbbaa0008d2d
list of surgeons Recently, the list of surgeons has been removed by without discussion or note in these talk pages, with the claim that it is promotional. I disagree with the characterization of the physician list. I do not believe it promotes any given surgeon when all the major such surgeons are listed. In this context I do not believe this list is at all promotional. Those surgeons hardly need promotion, when their waiting lists are already six months or more deep. I also believe it is important to list these people so that nobody ever gets the misimpression that such surgery is performed primarily by anyone other than reputable, accredited plastic surgeons who are members of the ASPS and other relevant organizations. In this specific case, I also believe that it is important to humanize the existence of this surgery with the names of its actual practitioners. Let us not disappear the FFS surgeons to an anonymous status, when the work they do is so vitally important to its recipients. Removal of the surgeon list also decreases the verifiability of this article's contents. (That is another matter which should be addressed - this article needs some reference citations at its end.) There may be another reasons that the list of names should be maintained. Please feel free to add to the list. I will wait to restore this list until others have had an opportunity express there opinions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
02cdd33a6dbfe102
Thank you. Is the wing used on this machine comparable to the Davis wing of the B-24?
0
0
0
0
0
0
02ce85d7644704f5
Ohio State Got Pwned during the BCS CHampionship, this needs to be added NOW!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
02d2d83f89c85334
" A well deserved barnstar. – (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0