tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	threat int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1
0466285f6f4a5161	2005 (UTC) The example is a poor one, and should be removed from the article. The article states that it seems to require 5 colors, presumably because the grey area cannot simply be colored red, yellow or blue without re-coloring. However, it can be colored green, and that doesn't require shuffling any of the other colors around. This makes it a very misleading counterexample. I know I spent a lot of time scratching my head wondering why this was considered a counter-example at all, and how the caption made any sense. Please either replace it with an example which does need to be re-colored in order to work or remove it (not that I don't think it's a valiant attempt, but it's just confusing). Thanks. - 21:31, 9 August	0	0	0	0
046b9125a2196312	You may have responded, but you did not answer the question. What is your answer to the question (in 25 words or less)?	0	0	0	0
046f63a1772d0a4a	Welcome! Hello, Cordiez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!	0	0	0	0
046f6f7cd1bff5e7	" For example, a prior discussion: The whole story of Frank Dux and the Kumite is a fraud. There is no such thing as the ""Kumite"" tournament. Does anyone honestly believe that such a world class underground full contact tournament could have gone on, and there would remain no evidence of it beside Dux's testimony? Anyone who could produce evidence of such a thing would have a million dollar story, but no one has. Wouldn't someone eventually come forward, or one or two fighters maybe speak out against it? What about the families of the fighters? Wouldn't they notice that their loved ones come home with broken bones and missing teeth? Dux himself claims that there were fatalities. In that case wouldn't the families of the dead fighters investigate what happened? Dux further claims that there were spectators gambling in the event (as in the movie), then how could they keep the silence of the spectators for all these years? To this day there remains no video, or pictures or anything to substantiate Dux's claims. Dux further claims that he holds the record for the fastest ""kick with a knockout"" at 72 mph. This makes no sense whatsoever. Is there a cop with a radar gun next to ring, measuring the speed of every strike? A 72 mph kick seems impossible, as swords don't even swing that fast. Someone wouldn't just ""jump into"" such an event either, but they would have training partners, and a record of their fighting career. They would have won tournaments, and fought in other full-contact venues (like ones that actually exist), yet their is no footage or evidence of Dux's participation in such events. He is a martial artist, but nothing like he claims. The only thing that's been knocked out here is Dux's credibility. Soldier of Fortune magazine exposed his lies about his military career. Using the Freedom of information act they showed that the actual years of his service in the military don't match up with his claims. He could have never served in Vietnam, and was never a special op like he claims. They exposed a picture of him in the military as a hoax, by showing that the ribbons and medals on his uniform are inconsistent with his branch of service. His own response to this is that the uniform was a costume that he was wearing on the way to a halloween party. You gotta be kidding me. Dux sued them for libel and lost. He also sued Jean Claude Van Damme, saying that he (Dux) had come up with the story for the movie ""The Quest"", and that Van Damme had made a contract with him for royalties that were never paid. Dux failed to produce any evidence of such a contract, and claimed that the missing evidence was destroyed in an earthquake. Van Damme's lawyer ripped Dux's credibility to shreds, showing that Dux's apartment was not damaged like he said it was, and produced a cast of witnesses to support that Dux is a story teller and pathological liar. In his book, Dux goes on to make other astounding claims about being a real life James Bond character working for the CIA during the 80's, and many more fantastic tales. The publisher (Harper Collins) pulled the book, and not due to poor sales either. Maybe because they realized they had been duped by this guy, just like the producers of the movie Bloodsport. Just goes to show how little credibility Hollywood has, even when they make the claim that something is based on a true story. 71.233.140.67 (talk) * First, let me say I agree with you. I want to make that clear, because you're not going to like the answer I have to give you. Read WP:TRUTH and one of the first things you will see is: ""Truth is not the criteria for inclusion of any idea or statement in a Wikipedia article, even if it is on a scientific topic. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true."" I don't like that. You probably won't either, but that is the state of affairs. Those excellent questions you asked? Those are considered original research WP:OR. If someone else asks them in a reliable source, then we can add that to this article. But until they do, we can't. Although we can all edit here, we don't own Wikipedia. So when Dux disagrees with something and decides to sue, he doesn't come after Niteshift36 (although he might try), he comes after Wikipedia. The standard for biographies of living people WP:BLP is even higher than for articles about the deceased or other topics. I can't, for example say that Mr. John Doe is a lying a-hole on Wikipedia if he is still alive. I can't even say it on a talk page or my own user page. But if a writer in Time magazine does an interview where his former boss calls Doe a lying a-hole, we can possibly include that. There are a lot of people who have asked the questions you did. I	0	0	0	0
04786b1e2dcb1171	Sorry every I am trying to figure out the talk pages If anyone can fix the format of my text please do or tell me how to thanks	0	0	0	0
0479cbe984a6f3ca	Dang, the hooks are tricky. I fixed the redlink. Feel free to expand others ) (talk · contribs)	0	0	0	0
047d8c8b1a57ebec	" Haha I was just having a good time.►''''''Holla! "	0	0	0	0
047e60bd3dad9e97	IPA sounds What is the difference between the following?: /t͡s/ and /ts/ /t͡ʃ/ and /tʃ/ /d͡ʒ/ and /dʒ/	0	0	0	0
048023a865d5c6fa	" ACD's Star, This is a ""reverse blue."" About 10% of ACD's are reverse blue, and another 5% are reverse red. This is the Dalmation gene becoming dominate. They don't quilify for show, but they can be great buddies. P.S. You should put your buddy on a measured diet. "	0	0	0	0
0485b5e1e5d6e005	WP:CWW Please read WP:CWW. You are not at liberty to copy content from one place in wikipedia to another without attribution. To do so is in violation of the wikipedia licensing rules. If you wish to edit wikipedia constructively then respect this rule, which is one of our most fundamental. I endorse what Polyamorph is saying. And there is no point in deleting his message. — (talk · contribs)	0	0	0	0
0486db6c7cff7bc1	June 2009 (UTC) There was a reference in one millimeter from the image's hyperlink; http://lifeboat.com/ex/law.of.accelerating.returns Why haven't you checked it? Kurzweil is among the most honoured US scientists: http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.ray.kurzweil If you are so lazy, you should keep as far away from Wikipedia as possible. 16:47, 16	0	0	0	0
04885437ed00d22e	is it needed? The part talking about WWE. I do not think they need the stuff written in the ().	0	0	0	0
0492b707ff4aec21	because it's completely generic	0	0	0	0
049859b64f7e34e1	Over-use of shy template I have reversed your 89 uses of the shy template at Jean Berko Gleason, and thought I should explain why.Unfortunately, the Wikipedia search treats all the part-words, each side of the shy template, as separate words, so they appear as a vast number of mis-spellings, Although useful for very long words, such as the example at Template:Shy, it should be used sparingly - the third word of a line, is highly unlikely to need splitting as a line-end word, whilst breaking words across two lines makes them much harder to read. It really doesn't matter if there is a short space at the end of a line, although very long spaces can be confusing as to whether the sentence has come to a premature, abrupt, end or not.-	0	0	0	0
0498b42897d5c471	More lies. It is clear that her goal is not to help improve the pages but to torment me with her campaign of lies and threats. is the problem.	0	0	0	0
049c6fcc694ef505	You obviously have some severe mental problems, and I want you to stop harassing me. You failed in your quest for an Rfa as people like you don't deserve to be administrators on Wikipedia. In fact, you don't even deserve to be on Wikipedia PERIOD.	1	0	0	1
04a3342a5175e19d	Are the pixels Square or Rectangular? Does the 480i standard prescribe square or rectangular pixels for the image? Perhaps this should be tossed in the article.	0	0	0	0
04a41a500698314e	Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Orange. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Talk	0	0	0	0
04a61d7571ec124e	" If you think about it, most every word in English was borrowed from some other language, because words are very rarely invented out of nothing. ""Pizza"" was taken from Italian, but is really a routine English word now. It's not exactly some esoteric word used in specific contexts, like yakuza or jihad. Plus, who needs to be taught the pronunciation of pizza?"	0	0	0	0
04aceda902e94793	" hi there Thanks for your kind comment! "	0	0	0	0
04ae9098313f5c55	" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bayanihan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Suave "	0	0	0	0
04b064b41b709257	Thanks Greg. I see s/he has been blocked but I'm hopeful that something positive will come from it. S/he seems genuinely concerned with article quality which is a positive basis to work from going forward. Sarah	0	0	0	0
04b3d1aa8a1244f1	Organization I reorganized the page a bit just now, because the second heading was completely blank. It looked to me that it just needed to have its sub-sections demoted, (which is what I did), but if it was actually blank due to vandalism, could someone fix it? I couldn't see any tons'o'deletion vandalism in recent edits...	0	0	0	0
04b45d38ee4ff8ee	Whether offtopic or not (and I don't think they are), many of the threads are entirely redundant. I say we merge the following sections 'Please Remove this Article', 'This article is clearly mindless bigotry' and possibly 'Some findings ridiculous' are merely arguments as to whether the hypothesis is valid. They are not discussions on the article itself, and how to make sure it's NPOV. I'm tempted to go ahead with some reorganization of the page, without deleting.	0	0	0	0
04b68c94978546d3	" Adding the Nazi party to the party parameter, before the CDU, was non-standard and inappropriate. The Nazi Party addition was only identified as vandalism after you added it repeatedly (with the edit summary ""reverting whitewashing"", which looked to me like an attempt to smear the subject of the biography), after it had already been removed once and the inappropriateness pointed out. I don't intend to continue this discussion. "	0	0	0	0
04bbad785f0ebe0d	Good! Please understand that I'll be happy to discuss constructively anything that you or anyone else wants to discuss, and I will be patient about working towards something where we can all be satisfied (or all be equally dissatisfied!). What I am doing, and what I am going to continue to do, is raise the concerns that I have had since your edits of late April, and to do so in what I consider to be a calm manner: one-by-one, not starting a new point until the present point has been agreed upon. But I do not want to be called a POV pusher, or to be accused of trying to have my own way.	0	0	0	0
04bd759daee4aad0	Edits on Bombardier CSeries page Dear Tagremover, thank You for Your edits on the Bombardier CSeries page, I trust they were performed on good faith. Although I would like to tell You that the reference You used (Bombardier CSeries Factsheet) is an old brochure from January 2009. Also the French and Japanese articles on the Bombardier CSeries are outdated and still list the ER versions of the aircraft. During 2012, Bombardier removed all references to the ER and XT versions from their factsheets, this was discussed on the article's discussion page and a revision was promptly made to the section in the article (with this edit, dated December 18, 2012). Furthermore, in March 2013, Bombardier revised several key data (like aircraft's dimensions and performance data) and I performed a full review of the specifications section in the article's page (with this edit, dated March 8, 2013). Thank You for Your understanding,	0	0	0	0
04be2b6e1a3ebbd1	"[festival.1september.ru/articles/510927/] This shows that the story is included in the school curriculum 3 classes today, but I learned this story from the textbook ""Native question"" in the mid 70's. "	0	0	0	0
04be33fafd859b88	"OK Lets keep your discussion here "" Hey cowardly anonymous poster. Give me a specific example of what you have a problem with and I'll be glad to respond. Otherwise, we'll keep deleting your useless diatribe. -Nv8200p talk "" so that it will tie nicely with your other corrupt activities. I hope you dont mind me reverting back below what your lover boy vandalized earlier on. Vandalism and indigestion is a Danish Norwegian trait apparently but if he sucks well and gets you going, well what can I say. )) Somehow the following tread was repeatedly deleted, including a user called AYLA. Deleting talk page entries is vandalism and reflects disturbed mentality. I would rather see entries in response made and left as it is. 71.184.25.9 I disagree. I find the question intriguing and deserves an answer by the user to explain his irresponsible actions. YOur look on your photograph and your actions (childish) on wikipedia are very schizophrenic. Do you have schizophrenia as your looks suggest? (this is a serious question.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.57.26 (talk) "	0	0	0	0
04c00f010b1232c4	" I disagree, especially as you're talking about a comparison that was being made in 2004 when Wikicities had that name. The GeoCities article states ""GeoCities was the third-most visited website on the World Wide Web, behind AOL and Yahoo!."" - that's not negative. Anyway, the whole thing should probably be removed since most people were not making any such comparisons. Instead, people were assuming it was a wiki site for cities which is why the name was dropped in 2006. 58.168.75.100 "	0	0	0	0
04c387644a08075d	Rob,you're a little coward, and thuggish boor. IF you got the stuff, come to wikipedia review and tell the world why you not a grand dickhead	1	1	0	1
04d4b06ffc2e7c57	" Thanks Avruch, that's exactly the point I was trying to make in the RfC. Would it be possible to ask Elonka to address directly the criticisms and answer them rather than question the credibility of the critics? That may go a long way towards helping some resolution of the RfC, as it currently comes across as a dialogue de sourds (not sure what the right English expression would be- transliterates as ""deaf people having a conversation""). "	0	0	0	0
04d9fa5cc9ffdf3e	Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2015 request unprotect page so as it can be updated.	0	0	0	0
04e4ced67c384571	The payment scheme of the heraldic officers is ambiguous: Are the sums mentioned paid per day of work, a week, a month or a year? I know it sounds like a silly question at first, but since it _is_ mentioned that the payment is only nominal, one is left to wonder. (ie, is it per day, or is a leftover from somewhere in the 15th century, and is the salary for a longer stretch of time)	0	0	0	0
04e5fa68a727342e	" Well, maybe not a ""good"" source, but these are my two cents: I study Electrical Engineering in Madrid's Technical School and I often check my e-mail in a hall where there are several computers for students. I don't use Tuenti but every single day I hear conversations about someone's pics on Tuenti, and every single day there are people next to me checking someone up on Tuenti. Tuenti is definitely more popular than Facebook in Madrid's universities."	0	0	0	0
04e8e9ffb73672a4	" Sorry, but no. It only limits readers to that specific category. Yes, there will be redundacy in the entire community but the problem is ""Anyone can edit"", so when something new gets put in, it can create redundacy. It happens. But in this case, it was not needed. * helps expand the readers view of the entire company and their subsidaries as well especially related sectors if they want to research it more. However you do a google search with ""Northrop Grumman +wiki"", the first result of that page will be obviously Northrop Grumman, not *. Why? They're expecting the main page of Northrop Grumman. If the first page yields no result, then they're going to hit the back button and go find another site out there that'll help them. "	0	0	0	0
04e9e4c4b0376157	" I don't know if it's too late to contribute to this slow-moving discussion. But if discussion is not closed, I would vote to move this page to ""Go-Tairo,"" or perhaps to ""Council of Five Elders"" (but not ""Council of five elders,"" as that implies the article refers to any council of any five elders). "	0	0	0	0
04eb46c10559f1ab	"==Number of Adepts == Because Spiritist Moviment doesn't proselytizes and is not a religious denomination (as states in the article), there is no current estimation for the number of Spiritists in Brazil. The IBGE estimation came from the census on religion, but many Spiritists do not consider themselves Spiritism ""followers"", because it is not a religion. Another poll made by a established poll research institution in Brazil shows that half of Brazilian population believes in reincarnation. Once Buddhism and Hinduism are almost non-existent in Brazil, it shows the strong influence of The Spiritist Doctrine and other native believes in Brazil. Moreover, in another poll (Rede Globo Mineira, 2000) in the populous State of Minas Gerais, Chico Xavier, the most popular spiritist medium in Brazil, was elected the Mineiro (Minas's citizen) of the century, competing against other popular celebrities like the former President Juscelino Kubischeck and inventor Santos Dumont. Recently Epoca Magazine comments an statistic of 20 to 30 millions of spiritists in Brazil. For the reasons above I'm removing the badly grounded statistics about the number of spiritists in Brazil. "	0	0	0	0
04ebdedacbb5ae37	Wow arent you rude. When the article no longer deals in accusations then it can be renamed something other then allegations ... So instead of making factually wrong articles the goal should be to fix the Syria article, not break everything else to be like the broken ones. Not really sure where bias comes in, its like stating if we call one white man a racist we need to call them all racists, its wrong to do so, but we need them all to be wrong so they match ... that makes little sense and if you are going to ignore my arguement it shows you have no counter claim.	0	0	0	0
04eed223ff75f104	request that the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi article is made fully protected The rationale is that after several weeks of work, it now appears acceptable to all editors - regardless of what might be said on various talk pages. Kind regards,	0	0	0	0
04f18d476f730184	Pattren of edit is 100% same and soon you will see how admin will check these 3 users and block them as socks. and for You i advise that you can not revert others Warnings even on your own talk page. It is bad faith so Brother i will strongly recommend you to follow what WP rules which say no sock puppetry or bad faith editing.	0	0	0	0
04f1b45c0380f70e	And I believe you're being an arse, but hey, I cope....	1	1	0	1
04f3480f49ef78cf	Bad No way, it was created not in 2002, but at least in 2001 with the release of DJ Narrows' 'Saved Soul' on his Resurrection Label. 86.57.254.215	0	0	0	0
04f7445f664896e6	Kirtley I don't dispute that a good article may be possible about Kirtley, but it would need to include sources and be written in a more encyclopaedic tone. Guy	0	0	0	0
04f824947dc348f2	Effectiveness of Lamictal That section appears to be wrong. Lamictal is effective at Prophylaxis or delaying the mania, depressive, or rapid cycle. It is not effective more than a placebo in current state of either of those. You can read citation 8 ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2580079/ ) whereas I think I read it and understand it more than whoever wrote that line. Lamictal's own perscriber guide says it is effective at DELAYING any of those three, INCLUDING RAPID CYCLE mania. It published those two studies. It did not publish the studies that say it is not effective at treating CURRENT any of those episodes. http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_lamictal.pdf . please agree somehow to fix that section. 173.55.18.122	0	0	0	0
04fe3f7a6efcb34f	Addendum: I fixed your editnotice to this page, which someone hacked, so you should ask for it to be protected.	0	0	0	0
050fff5fb8ab0df2	Talk:Sukhoi_Superjet_100#Vote_on_flag_removal This (inofficial) voting about flags and country info in orders might concern even this article. It is proposed to remove about 10.000 flags related to aircraft orders and articles including country info.	0	0	0	0
0515d45ef91d15d3	Why don't you die? talk	1	0	1	0
0516e272a90e8acb	27 00:45, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
052c08728e200abe	", 29 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks a lot Matt... Again. jan→ 15:43"	0	0	0	0
05309a7eba6dde39	Hello. Welcome to the talk page of eva-psyche. Please post any comments to me below. Please try to remember to sign your posts with four of these: ~ . I look forward to hearing your comments!	0	0	0	0
0537f01d7e81bcda	And my email adress: [email protected]	0	0	0	0
053cd5bbf3f7f1dd	" That is just plain BS, forgive the wording....if you look at that rule, it is meant for ""empty"" sites that redirect to a site with content. The original URL is to a site with content. User:kalimantan"	0	0	0	0
053e98c35a81aa15	No need to request a CheckUser. FrancisTyers just blocked me! you have just blocked an innoscent, who happens to agree with another wikipedian! Are you happy now?	0	0	0	0
0543bc9294c8121c	" Wikipedia and copyright Hello DABAIJING, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Twitterature has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. "	0	0	0	0
054cf743b5d3f913	User:Toomanywordstoolittletime‎ For what its worth, I disagree with your characterization of as a spammer; I believe they were a new editor contributing in good faith, who does not understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I had been having a discussion with the user over the past few days on my talk page regarding their articles Jenny Sawyer and 60second Recap. It was only today, after they restored the 60second Recap article that they began adding the external links. Granted, they were making a lot of promotional entries, but they had also been doing some minor fixes to articles. They do seem to have some ownership issues, which frequently makes alignment towards working within site guidelines difficult (and sometimes impossible); but I had hoped they could be made a productive contributor to Wikipedia. - (talk • contribs) -	0	0	0	0
054d2b299f24cc97	":::Thus the NPOV words ""VARIOUS FORMS"" in the article, POV pusher. Iran, it is true, is the only other nation to call theirs ""Mutaween"". Not even the Taliban called their religious police Mutaween, but you at least admit they HAD them. Egypt enforces it as a special division of state-employed clerics. Yemen uses theirs to enforce the state's version of Islam as well. Now stop trying to insert factual inaccuracies into the article! "	0	0	0	0
054eb861999eef61	but true of myself as I unobjectively shill for certain positions	0	0	0	0
054f2291663db9af	You pig sucker, see whats coming your way now.	1	0	0	0
0553a0c27cbd6718	":Thanks! Would you care to do the honours and include that information in the article? (T) @ (C) "	0	0	0	0
05580f07ffaa58e1	However, at 189m above sea level, St. Andrew's is definitely at the highest point in Netherton.	0	0	0	0
055fb824e6c24f9b	" I honestly do. I would be willing to discuss this, but for now I wish to place a notability tag and go from there.... maybe someone can add sources.127 "	0	0	0	0
05638a6c431ef4b4	Reply Please see my reply on the talk page of List of Presidents of India. Thanks,	0	0	0	0
05685e17807c9d3e	If my name has to go every muslim with allah in his name has to pick a new one too.	0	0	0	0
056b82183d732175	149 is abit bloggy and only supports that two foot bollard comments to show dave was a little bit silly to do that. I would take it out. ( )	0	0	0	0
056d40b7a971de0c	" Bhangra Why exactly did you delete the image out of ""Bhangra"", back in December? user:zanimum"	0	0	0	0
056f0c958cc77e43	" Image:USTC building.jpg Assuming this building is still standing, then somebody could easily take a new photo of it and release it under a free license. We therefore cannot use this fair-use photo. — ☠ "	0	0	0	0
057541f263f7556d	" The attack? I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ""attack"". For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either."	0	0	0	0
057a2386c5ae9d2b	Association of State and Territorial Health Officials	0	0	0	0
057d7c026fe4d9b7	you need to put the history section back. the wiki is incomplete without that section. correct factual history data needs to be there. not excluded from the wiki. as is currently the case.	0	0	0	0
057d9854f3761383	sitush i know better than u who jatt sikhs are!see m not so free like u all people to edit random articles on wikkepedia iv got a life i just presented the true view of jatts! u know nothing about them try saying shudra on face of a jatt they might be you last words m not thereatning m just telling the truth please visit punjab once in your lifetime and sitush salle harami karar banye tujhe kuch ni pata zada na bol sala wikepedia pe batha writer ban raha hai u are nothing in real life! now block me cause i dont care cause people like you are just dumb!and will stay dumb!	0	0	0	1
058ef74556c682e3	I fully understand, the whole point of the message was to gently remind you about the issue, not to slap a huge warning on your page like some editors feel the need to do.	0	0	0	0
0596d2109997148d	" Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT) The ""offending"" list was taken ""copy and paste"" from Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT) OMIT Ville de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu A single-city authority (OMIT No. Route Name Route Map Schedule Departure Area96-E Montreal / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Express)Schedule and Information Gate 18196-SE Montreal / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Super Express)Schedule and Information Gate 1896-L Montreal / Brossard / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Local service)Schedule and Information Gate 1796-LH Montreal / Brossard / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Local Extended Service)Schedule and Information Gate 17 No ""sand box"" needed nor required. Make the corrections as need be, but do not just delete. "	0	0	0	0
0598dbef8f8309ff	You want to have a little read of wp:AGF, but don't worry, because that is a bridge we will cross in good time.	0	0	0	0
0599c8151fe6a0e7	" History (Quote from copy) ""On January 11, 2012, operators of the Web site for participants of the Challenge and Active Lifestyle programs learned that the site had been hacked, resulting in the release of personal information of the participants.[4] The President's Challenge site displayed a notice that it was down for ""Site Maintenance – We're taking a little breather.""[5] On January 20, 2012, the site was modified to explain the hacking.[6] On January 27, 2012, The President's Challenge sent out emails to its participants saying that the Web site was functional as of January 24, 2012, and asked participants to reset their user passwords.[7][8]""(End quote) Can somebody explain why these notes are included? I suggest deleting them on the following grounds: The hacking incident was not a milestone event in the history of this movement. By this I mean it did not change the name or the aim of the organization. It did not amount to a major disruption to the program, and it seems trivial compared to all other items in the History section. "	0	0	0	0
059af4bed7d1a9c0	Information is not knowledge. That is funny. I wonder how high heights can you reach defending the nonsense.	0	0	0	0
059e4008b194cd3d	" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Bo'ness, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:LuK3my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
05c3d4e151c59367	In the spirit of goodwill, I'm willing to nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, and outside editors will discuss whether Wikipedia should keep it. Would you like to provide a brief overview of the reasons why the article should be deleted for the benefit of editors? Please make it as succint as possible. (talk)	0	0	0	0
05c3da5274053003	WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VI (February 2008) The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on by	0	0	0	0
05c5a12934de785e	Adding to this commentary, there is an article on the Sunda Plate. Regards,	0	0	0	0
05c865634bc46cd3	Naamswijziging Hi Ucucha, I did this request, apparently on the wrong place. Could I ask you to fix it? I would say it can easily be done by removing Songtsän Gampo and renaming Songtsen Gampo to Songtsän Gampo, as Tibetologist likes. There's not really a need to merge histories, I would say, because nothing has changed in the article. Can you do that or should it not be done that way on English Wikipedia? Regards,	0	0	0	0
05d0748deddb8102	" Re Dont throw a warning at me, and do not call my edits vandalism. I just told you why I reverted your edit. Those links may not fully comply with the rule, but they are good sites, whether you think they are or not. I'll prove it. If you had bothered to navigate through those sites you would see: Mew Mew Power Uncensored Analyzes the difference between Tokyo Mew Mew and Mew Mew Power. Gives info about the manga and anime series. I actually checked, and that info is correct. Gives month and date when the manga was translated and when 4kids licensed Tokyo Mew Mew, when they changed the name, etc (actually look through the site. Analyzes each episode and lists all the differences as much as possible. THen gives how much of the original content was kept. Mew Mew Alliance HAS THE ACTUAL PRESS RELEASES FROM 4KIDS RELATING TO MEW MEW POWER. new relating to Mew Mew Power, such as when it was aired in other countries. and just to think you could seen of this yourself, if you took the time to actually navigate through the sites. JUSTICE IS SERVED! "	0	0	0	0
05d1ffc0bd6198f1	It's exactly the same template. There are not two templates.	0	0	0	0
05e2495e208c5a0c	I'm very sorry, , that I will be unable to help with Peer Reviews for the foreseeable future. I'll remove my name from the list to forestall any further confusion.	0	0	0	0
05e670deb7c848bc	No, that is why I created a wiki	0	0	0	0
05eab71c908629af	Saudi-Arabia provided more assistance to Hamas than Iran? Prove? In the article it says this Iran has provided funding to Hamas but more funding has come from Saudi Arabia and also from the Sunni Arab countries like Qatar, UAE etc. and refers to this article: http://www.economist.com/node/12959539?story_id=12959539 But this claim quoted above is not traceable anywhere in the article. Therefore I ask to remove that part, please.	0	0	0	0
05ec6b9058d76d78	I have asked an admin... ...to block me for 24 hours to give me an enforced cooldown away from some of the idiots infesting these pages of late.	0	0	0	0
05edd7567585078e	" re: your message Hi Salle81, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page .69 talk "	0	0	0	0
05f2fd106ef1dda9	hey you have a giant penis. is that what allows you to moderate wiki so well? 8==============D>>>>>>><><>	1	1	0	1
05f53f5cdea5fdcf	regarding your most recent comment on mytalk page go ahead. do it. it's my school IP and they make legitimate edits. LOLOLOL	0	0	0	0
05f5fecc53f786c7	The SarekOfVulcan was forum shopping	0	0	0	0
05fe59bc56d37233	facebook moshav alma applications · facebook free Skype to Skype calls Trial software Members Photos Sharing Application Choose from thousands of FREE apps	0	0	0	0
0607806e67b420f6	Tell me why Irondome put the Western wall (not in Israel) in Israel. Give me the real reason.	0	0	0	0
060cd6129a7f9985	" Your edits are blatant POV, they don't follow WP:MOS, they read like an advertisement, and the text is probably copied from somewhere on the Ares website; which would be a copyright violation. Also, please explain how I am using Wikipedia as a personal blog, and how my edits are inaccurate. BTW, you've been reverted by another editor. — MP5 "	0	0	0	0
061419fffb8386f7	" Bad Agendas written in to this article Hello folks, I'm not a wiki-writer. I just use it from time to time. But I am familiar with problems when some pages have points of view and agendas written in to them, and the American Civil War articles are rife with these problems. You'd think the war was still on. This article on the 43rd Battalion is generally very good, but someone has done their best to wreck the ship, nevertheless. A paragraph in this article goes off-track and attempts to paint a picture that these soldiers were ""guerillas"". Anyone familiar with the writings of the war knows this word was used extensively and daily in newspapers, official US Army reports and accounts to refer to not just uniformed soldiers of the CS Army, but to any and all people of the South. To discuss the use of this term in this article is a coy trick to insert an agenda, intended to disparage, vice simply communicate good Wiki information about this topic. ""Guerilla"" was so commonly used as a term in this war, that it cannot be said, at all, that this term applied to, or was used more commonly for any one unit or group in the war, than any other. If editors continue to keep this slant and bias in the article, and contiue deleting other fair contributions which are neutral, then my comment here serves as a marker to future editors of the proof of the problem in this page, and the particular set of self-chosen watch-guards who intend to keep it here, while pretending they are not the root cause of the problem."	0	0	0	0
0618cd56fb5411be	May 2008 (UTC) Three comments about NPOV The second paragraph in this article links to 5 specific and very negative reviews. However, no positive reviews are provided. Instead, readers are provided to the wiki entries for religious right, conservative and creationist. Since Rotten Tomatoes was used as a primary source for ratings, could this sentence be updated to include at least one link to a positive film critic review? As mentioned in Wikipedia:NPOV, even minority viewpoints cannot be completed ignored (and in this case, minority viewpoint should not be applied since the minority viewpoint is the thesis of the film). There seems to be a large discrepancy between film critic/scientific community reception of this film and popular opinion (user reviews) of this film. Popular opinion votes on Internet websites are not considered a reliable source, but in this case, since Rotten Tomatoes was already used as a primary source for this portion of the article, could this section be updated to include a reference to popular reception to this film, with a link to the Rotten Tomatoes User Reviews? (368 reviews, 184 positive, 50% rating at the time of this edit). Google user reviews for this film (an aggregate, largely from epinions.com) show a similar 2.6/5 or 52% positive rating. Why is this film being treated so much differently than Fahrenheit 9/11. In this entry, there is no reference to film critic opinion or popular opinion of the film even though the reception was [nearly as extreme] (except positive, not negative - 85% at Rotten Tomatoes) 11:25, 5	0	0	0	0
06198359fbc89cb2	The sentences didn't need to be linked. Semi-colons are progressively seen as old fashioned. Statistically, their use has continuously and rapidly declined. Amongst academics, two separate sentences are presently seen as better.	0	0	0	0
061eabacdc10493b	Sorry, but I was not attempting to vex anyone. Anti or pro-homeopathy, what difference does it make? Please AGF.	0	0	0	0
061fcb89709e4b61	how much? Do you spend weekly on toilet paper???	0	0	0	0
062569ff543a829a	Regarding edits made June 10 2008 to Platte River Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. 71.237.79.210	0	0	0	0

0466285f6f4a5161

2005 (UTC) The example is a poor one, and should be removed from the article. The article states that it seems to require 5 colors, presumably because the grey area cannot simply be colored red, yellow or blue without re-coloring. However, it *can* be colored green, and that doesn't require shuffling any of the other colors around. This makes it a very misleading counterexample. I know I spent a lot of time scratching my head wondering why this was considered a counter-example at all, and how the caption made any sense. Please either replace it with an example which does need to be re-colored in order to work or remove it (not that I don't think it's a valiant attempt, but it's just confusing). Thanks. - 21:31, 9 August

0

046b9125a2196312

You may have responded, but you did not answer the question. What is your answer to the question (in 25 words or less)?

0

046f63a1772d0a4a

Welcome! Hello, Cordiez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

0

046f6f7cd1bff5e7

" For example, a prior discussion: The whole story of Frank Dux and the Kumite is a fraud. There is no such thing as the ""Kumite"" tournament. Does anyone honestly believe that such a world class underground full contact tournament could have gone on, and there would remain no evidence of it beside Dux's testimony? Anyone who could produce evidence of such a thing would have a million dollar story, but no one has. Wouldn't someone eventually come forward, or one or two fighters maybe speak out against it? What about the families of the fighters? Wouldn't they notice that their loved ones come home with broken bones and missing teeth? Dux himself claims that there were fatalities. In that case wouldn't the families of the dead fighters investigate what happened? Dux further claims that there were spectators gambling in the event (as in the movie), then how could they keep the silence of the spectators for all these years? To this day there remains no video, or pictures or anything to substantiate Dux's claims. Dux further claims that he holds the record for the fastest ""kick with a knockout"" at 72 mph. This makes no sense whatsoever. Is there a cop with a radar gun next to ring, measuring the speed of every strike? A 72 mph kick seems impossible, as swords don't even swing that fast. Someone wouldn't just ""jump into"" such an event either, but they would have training partners, and a record of their fighting career. They would have won tournaments, and fought in other full-contact venues (like ones that actually exist), yet their is no footage or evidence of Dux's participation in such events. He is a martial artist, but nothing like he claims. The only thing that's been knocked out here is Dux's credibility. Soldier of Fortune magazine exposed his lies about his military career. Using the Freedom of information act they showed that the actual years of his service in the military don't match up with his claims. He could have never served in Vietnam, and was never a special op like he claims. They exposed a picture of him in the military as a hoax, by showing that the ribbons and medals on his uniform are inconsistent with his branch of service. His own response to this is that the uniform was a costume that he was wearing on the way to a halloween party. You gotta be kidding me. Dux sued them for libel and lost. He also sued Jean Claude Van Damme, saying that he (Dux) had come up with the story for the movie ""The Quest"", and that Van Damme had made a contract with him for royalties that were never paid. Dux failed to produce any evidence of such a contract, and claimed that the missing evidence was destroyed in an earthquake. Van Damme's lawyer ripped Dux's credibility to shreds, showing that Dux's apartment was not damaged like he said it was, and produced a cast of witnesses to support that Dux is a story teller and pathological liar. In his book, Dux goes on to make other astounding claims about being a real life James Bond character working for the CIA during the 80's, and many more fantastic tales. The publisher (Harper Collins) pulled the book, and not due to poor sales either. Maybe because they realized they had been duped by this guy, just like the producers of the movie Bloodsport. Just goes to show how little credibility Hollywood has, even when they make the claim that something is based on a true story. 71.233.140.67 (talk) * First, let me say I agree with you. I want to make that clear, because you're not going to like the answer I have to give you. Read WP:TRUTH and one of the first things you will see is: ""Truth is not the criteria for inclusion of any idea or statement in a Wikipedia article, even if it is on a scientific topic. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true."" I don't like that. You probably won't either, but that is the state of affairs. Those excellent questions you asked? Those are considered original research WP:OR. If someone else asks them in a reliable source, then we can add that to this article. But until they do, we can't. Although we can all edit here, we don't own Wikipedia. So when Dux disagrees with something and decides to sue, he doesn't come after Niteshift36 (although he might try), he comes after Wikipedia. The standard for biographies of living people WP:BLP is even higher than for articles about the deceased or other topics. I can't, for example say that Mr. John Doe is a lying a-hole on Wikipedia if he is still alive. I can't even say it on a talk page or my own user page. But if a writer in Time magazine does an interview where his former boss calls Doe a lying a-hole, we can possibly include that. There are a lot of people who have asked the questions you did. I

0

04786b1e2dcb1171

Sorry every I am trying to figure out the talk pages If anyone can fix the format of my text please do or tell me how to thanks

0

0479cbe984a6f3ca

Dang, the hooks are tricky. I fixed the redlink. Feel free to expand others ) (talk · contribs)

0

047d8c8b1a57ebec

" Haha I was just having a good time.►''''''Holla! "

0

047e60bd3dad9e97

IPA sounds What is the difference between the following?: /t͡s/ and /ts/ /t͡ʃ/ and /tʃ/ /d͡ʒ/ and /dʒ/

0

048023a865d5c6fa

" ACD's Star, This is a ""reverse blue."" About 10% of ACD's are reverse blue, and another 5% are reverse red. This is the Dalmation gene becoming dominate. They don't quilify for show, but they can be great buddies. P.S. You should put your buddy on a measured diet. "

0

0485b5e1e5d6e005

WP:CWW Please read WP:CWW. You are not at liberty to copy content from one place in wikipedia to another without attribution. To do so is in violation of the wikipedia licensing rules. If you wish to edit wikipedia constructively then respect this rule, which is one of our most fundamental. I endorse what Polyamorph is saying. And there is no point in deleting his message. — (talk · contribs)

0

0486db6c7cff7bc1

June 2009 (UTC) There was a reference in one millimeter from the image's hyperlink; http://lifeboat.com/ex/law.of.accelerating.returns Why haven't you checked it? Kurzweil is among the most honoured US scientists: http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.ray.kurzweil If you are so lazy, you should keep as far away from Wikipedia as possible. 16:47, 16

0

04885437ed00d22e

is it needed? The part talking about WWE. I do not think they need the stuff written in the ().

0

0492b707ff4aec21

because it's completely generic

0

049859b64f7e34e1

Over-use of shy template I have reversed your 89 uses of the shy template at Jean Berko Gleason, and thought I should explain why.Unfortunately, the Wikipedia search treats all the part-words, each side of the shy template, as separate words, so they appear as a vast number of mis-spellings, Although useful for very long words, such as the example at Template:Shy, it should be used sparingly - the third word of a line, is highly unlikely to need splitting as a line-end word, whilst breaking words across two lines makes them much harder to read. It really doesn't matter if there is a short space at the end of a line, although very long spaces can be confusing as to whether the sentence has come to a premature, abrupt, end or not.-

0

0498b42897d5c471

More lies. It is clear that her goal is not to help improve the pages but to torment me with her campaign of lies and threats. is the problem.

0

049c6fcc694ef505

You obviously have some severe mental problems, and I want you to stop harassing me. You failed in your quest for an Rfa as people like you don't deserve to be administrators on Wikipedia. In fact, you don't even deserve to be on Wikipedia PERIOD.

1

0

1

0

04a3342a5175e19d

Are the pixels Square or Rectangular? Does the 480i standard prescribe square or rectangular pixels for the image? Perhaps this should be tossed in the article.

0

04a41a500698314e

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Orange. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Talk

0

04a61d7571ec124e

" If you think about it, most every word in English was borrowed from some other language, because words are very rarely invented out of nothing. ""Pizza"" was taken from Italian, but is really a routine English word now. It's not exactly some esoteric word used in specific contexts, like yakuza or jihad. Plus, who needs to be taught the pronunciation of pizza?"

0

04aceda902e94793

" hi there Thanks for your kind comment! "

0

04ae9098313f5c55

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bayanihan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Suave "

0

04b064b41b709257

Thanks Greg. I see s/he has been blocked but I'm hopeful that something positive will come from it. S/he seems genuinely concerned with article quality which is a positive basis to work from going forward. Sarah

0

04b3d1aa8a1244f1

Organization I reorganized the page a bit just now, because the second heading was completely blank. It looked to me that it just needed to have its sub-sections demoted, (which is what I did), but if it was actually blank due to vandalism, could someone fix it? I couldn't see any tons'o'deletion vandalism in recent edits...

0

04b45d38ee4ff8ee

Whether offtopic or not (and I don't think they are), many of the threads are entirely redundant. I say we merge the following sections 'Please Remove this Article', 'This article is clearly mindless bigotry' and possibly 'Some findings ridiculous' are merely arguments as to whether the hypothesis is valid. They are not discussions on the article itself, and how to make sure it's NPOV. I'm tempted to go ahead with some reorganization of the page, without deleting.

0

04b68c94978546d3

" Adding the Nazi party to the party parameter, before the CDU, was non-standard and inappropriate. The Nazi Party addition was only identified as vandalism after you added it repeatedly (with the edit summary ""reverting whitewashing"", which looked to me like an attempt to smear the subject of the biography), after it had already been removed once and the inappropriateness pointed out. I don't intend to continue this discussion. "

0

04bbad785f0ebe0d

Good! Please understand that I'll be happy to discuss constructively anything that you or anyone else wants to discuss, and I will be patient about working towards something where we can all be satisfied (or all be equally dissatisfied!). What I am doing, and what I am going to continue to do, is raise the concerns that I have had since your edits of late April, and to do so in what I consider to be a calm manner: one-by-one, not starting a new point until the present point has been agreed upon. But I do not want to be called a POV pusher, or to be accused of trying to have my own way.

0

04bd759daee4aad0

Edits on Bombardier CSeries page Dear Tagremover, thank You for Your edits on the Bombardier CSeries page, I trust they were performed on good faith. Although I would like to tell You that the reference You used (Bombardier CSeries Factsheet) is an old brochure from January 2009. Also the French and Japanese articles on the Bombardier CSeries are outdated and still list the ER versions of the aircraft. During 2012, Bombardier removed all references to the ER and XT versions from their factsheets, this was discussed on the article's discussion page and a revision was promptly made to the section in the article (with this edit, dated December 18, 2012). Furthermore, in March 2013, Bombardier revised several key data (like aircraft's dimensions and performance data) and I performed a full review of the specifications section in the article's page (with this edit, dated March 8, 2013). Thank You for Your understanding,

0

04be2b6e1a3ebbd1

"[festival.1september.ru/articles/510927/] This shows that the story is included in the school curriculum 3 classes today, but I learned this story from the textbook ""Native question"" in the mid 70's. "

0

04be33fafd859b88

"OK Lets keep your discussion here "" Hey cowardly anonymous poster. Give me a specific example of what you have a problem with and I'll be glad to respond. Otherwise, we'll keep deleting your useless diatribe. -Nv8200p talk "" so that it will tie nicely with your other corrupt activities. I hope you dont mind me reverting back below what your lover boy vandalized earlier on. Vandalism and indigestion is a Danish Norwegian trait apparently but if he sucks well and gets you going, well what can I say. )) Somehow the following tread was repeatedly deleted, including a user called AYLA. Deleting talk page entries is vandalism and reflects disturbed mentality. I would rather see entries in response made and left as it is. 71.184.25.9 I disagree. I find the question intriguing and deserves an answer by the user to explain his irresponsible actions. YOur look on your photograph and your actions (childish) on wikipedia are very schizophrenic. Do you have schizophrenia as your looks suggest? (this is a serious question.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.57.26 (talk) "

0

04c00f010b1232c4

" I disagree, especially as you're talking about a comparison that was being made in 2004 when Wikicities had that name. The GeoCities article states ""GeoCities was the third-most visited website on the World Wide Web, behind AOL and Yahoo!."" - that's not negative. Anyway, the whole thing should probably be removed since most people were not making any such comparisons. Instead, people were assuming it was a wiki site for cities which is why the name was dropped in 2006. 58.168.75.100 "

0

04c387644a08075d

Rob,you're a little coward, and thuggish boor. IF you got the stuff, come to wikipedia review and tell the world why you not a grand dickhead

1

0

1

0

1

0

04d4b06ffc2e7c57

" Thanks Avruch, that's exactly the point I was trying to make in the RfC. Would it be possible to ask Elonka to address directly the criticisms and answer them rather than question the credibility of the critics? That may go a long way towards helping some resolution of the RfC, as it currently comes across as a dialogue de sourds (not sure what the right English expression would be- transliterates as ""deaf people having a conversation""). "

0

04d9fa5cc9ffdf3e

Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2015 request unprotect page so as it can be updated.

0

04e4ced67c384571

The payment scheme of the heraldic officers is ambiguous: Are the sums mentioned paid per day of work, a week, a month or a year? I know it sounds like a silly question at first, but since it _is_ mentioned that the payment is only nominal, one is left to wonder. (ie, is it per day, or is a leftover from somewhere in the 15th century, and is the salary for a longer stretch of time)

0

04e5fa68a727342e

" Well, maybe not a ""good"" source, but these are my two cents: I study Electrical Engineering in Madrid's Technical School and I often check my e-mail in a hall where there are several computers for students. I don't use Tuenti but every single day I hear conversations about someone's pics on Tuenti, and every single day there are people next to me checking someone up on Tuenti. Tuenti is definitely more popular than Facebook in Madrid's universities."

0

04e8e9ffb73672a4

" Sorry, but no. It only limits readers to that specific category. Yes, there will be redundacy in the entire community but the problem is ""Anyone can edit"", so when something new gets put in, it can create redundacy. It happens. But in this case, it was not needed. * helps expand the readers view of the entire company and their subsidaries as well especially related sectors if they want to research it more. However you do a google search with ""Northrop Grumman +wiki"", the first result of that page will be obviously Northrop Grumman, not *. Why? They're expecting the main page of Northrop Grumman. If the first page yields no result, then they're going to hit the back button and go find another site out there that'll help them. "

0

04e9e4c4b0376157

" I don't know if it's too late to contribute to this slow-moving discussion. But if discussion is not closed, I would vote to move this page to ""Go-Tairo,"" or perhaps to ""Council of Five Elders"" (but not ""Council of five elders,"" as that implies the article refers to any council of any five elders). "

0

04eb46c10559f1ab

"==Number of Adepts == Because Spiritist Moviment doesn't proselytizes and is not a religious denomination (as states in the article), there is no current estimation for the number of Spiritists in Brazil. The IBGE estimation came from the census on religion, but many Spiritists do not consider themselves Spiritism ""followers"", because it is not a religion. Another poll made by a established poll research institution in Brazil shows that half of Brazilian population believes in reincarnation. Once Buddhism and Hinduism are almost non-existent in Brazil, it shows the strong influence of The Spiritist Doctrine and other native believes in Brazil. Moreover, in another poll (Rede Globo Mineira, 2000) in the populous State of Minas Gerais, Chico Xavier, the most popular spiritist medium in Brazil, was elected the Mineiro (Minas's citizen) of the century, competing against other popular celebrities like the former President Juscelino Kubischeck and inventor Santos Dumont. Recently Epoca Magazine comments an statistic of 20 to 30 millions of spiritists in Brazil. For the reasons above I'm removing the badly grounded statistics about the number of spiritists in Brazil. "

0

04ebdedacbb5ae37

Wow arent you rude. When the article no longer deals in accusations then it can be renamed something other then allegations ... So instead of making factually wrong articles the goal should be to fix the Syria article, not break everything else to be like the broken ones. Not really sure where bias comes in, its like stating if we call one white man a racist we need to call them all racists, its wrong to do so, but we need them all to be wrong so they match ... that makes little sense and if you are going to ignore my arguement it shows you have no counter claim.

0

04eed223ff75f104

request that the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi article is made fully protected The rationale is that after several weeks of work, it now appears acceptable to all editors - regardless of what might be said on various talk pages. Kind regards,

0

04f18d476f730184

Pattren of edit is 100% same and soon you will see how admin will check these 3 users and block them as socks. and for You i advise that you can not revert others Warnings even on your own talk page. It is bad faith so Brother i will strongly recommend you to follow what WP rules which say no sock puppetry or bad faith editing.

0

04f1b45c0380f70e

And I believe you're being an arse, but hey, I cope....

1

0

1

0

1

0

04f3480f49ef78cf

Bad No way, it was created not in 2002, but at least in 2001 with the release of DJ Narrows' 'Saved Soul' on his Resurrection Label. 86.57.254.215

0

04f7445f664896e6

Kirtley I don't dispute that a good article may be possible about Kirtley, but it would need to include sources and be written in a more encyclopaedic tone. Guy

0

04f824947dc348f2

Effectiveness of Lamictal That section appears to be wrong. Lamictal is effective at Prophylaxis or delaying the mania, depressive, or rapid cycle. It is not effective more than a placebo in current state of either of those. You can read citation 8 ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2580079/ ) whereas I think I read it and understand it more than whoever wrote that line. Lamictal's own perscriber guide says it is effective at DELAYING any of those three, INCLUDING RAPID CYCLE mania. It published those two studies. It did not publish the studies that say it is not effective at treating CURRENT any of those episodes. http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_lamictal.pdf . please agree somehow to fix that section. 173.55.18.122

0

04fe3f7a6efcb34f

Addendum: I fixed your editnotice to this page, which someone hacked, so you should ask for it to be protected.

0

050fff5fb8ab0df2

Talk:Sukhoi_Superjet_100#Vote_on_flag_removal This (inofficial) voting about flags and country info in orders might concern even this article. It is proposed to remove about 10.000 flags related to aircraft orders and articles including country info.

0

0515d45ef91d15d3

Why don't you die? talk

1

0

1

0

0516e272a90e8acb

27 00:45, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

0

052c08728e200abe

", 29 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks a lot Matt... Again. jan→ 15:43"

0

05309a7eba6dde39

Hello. Welcome to the talk page of eva-psyche. Please post any comments to me below. Please try to remember to sign your posts with four of these: ~ . I look forward to hearing your comments!

0

0537f01d7e81bcda

And my email adress: [email protected]

0

053cd5bbf3f7f1dd

" That is just plain BS, forgive the wording....if you look at that rule, it is meant for ""empty"" sites that redirect to a site with content. The original URL is to a site with content. User:kalimantan"

0

053e98c35a81aa15

No need to request a CheckUser. FrancisTyers just blocked me! you have just blocked an innoscent, who happens to agree with another wikipedian! Are you happy now?

0

0543bc9294c8121c

" Wikipedia and copyright Hello DABAIJING, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Twitterature has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. "

0

054cf743b5d3f913

User:Toomanywordstoolittletime‎ For what its worth, I disagree with your characterization of as a spammer; I believe they were a new editor contributing in good faith, who does not understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I had been having a discussion with the user over the past few days on my talk page regarding their articles Jenny Sawyer and 60second Recap. It was only today, after they restored the 60second Recap article that they began adding the external links. Granted, they were making a lot of promotional entries, but they had also been doing some minor fixes to articles. They do seem to have some ownership issues, which frequently makes alignment towards working within site guidelines difficult (and sometimes impossible); but I had hoped they could be made a productive contributor to Wikipedia. - (talk • contribs) -

0

054d2b299f24cc97

":::Thus the NPOV words ""VARIOUS FORMS"" in the article, POV pusher. Iran, it is true, is the only other nation to call theirs ""Mutaween"". Not even the Taliban called their religious police Mutaween, but you at least admit they HAD them. Egypt enforces it as a special division of state-employed clerics. Yemen uses theirs to enforce the state's version of Islam as well. Now stop trying to insert factual inaccuracies into the article! "

0

054eb861999eef61

but true of myself as I unobjectively shill for certain positions

0

054f2291663db9af

You pig sucker, see whats coming your way now.

1

0

0553a0c27cbd6718

":Thanks! Would you care to do the honours and include that information in the article? (T) @ (C) "

0

05580f07ffaa58e1

However, at 189m above sea level, St. Andrew's is definitely at the highest point in Netherton.

0

055fb824e6c24f9b

" I honestly do. I would be willing to discuss this, but for now I wish to place a notability tag and go from there.... maybe someone can add sources.127 "

0

05638a6c431ef4b4

Reply Please see my reply on the talk page of List of Presidents of India. Thanks,

0

05685e17807c9d3e

If my name has to go every muslim with allah in his name has to pick a new one too.

0

056b82183d732175

149 is abit bloggy and only supports that two foot bollard comments to show dave was a little bit silly to do that. I would take it out. ( )

0

056d40b7a971de0c

" Bhangra Why exactly did you delete the image out of ""Bhangra"", back in December? user:zanimum"

0

056f0c958cc77e43

" Image:USTC building.jpg Assuming this building is still standing, then somebody could easily take a new photo of it and release it under a free license. We therefore cannot use this fair-use photo. — ☠ "

0

057541f263f7556d

" The attack? I did not attack what's its name (SynchroCat?!!!) but it seems from the response that some editors at Wikipedia have a f- raging disease of attacking anyone outside the pool of Wikipedia editors that may question their judgement. You need to read the log before you label my comments ""attack"". For the record I dont think you are a f-gg-t either."

0

057a2386c5ae9d2b

Association of State and Territorial Health Officials

0

057d7c026fe4d9b7

you need to put the history section back. the wiki is incomplete without that section. correct factual history data needs to be there. not excluded from the wiki. as is currently the case.

0

057d9854f3761383

sitush i know better than u who jatt sikhs are!see m not so free like u all people to edit random articles on wikkepedia iv got a life i just presented the true view of jatts! u know nothing about them try saying shudra on face of a jatt they might be you last words m not thereatning m just telling the truth please visit punjab once in your lifetime and sitush salle harami karar banye tujhe kuch ni pata zada na bol sala wikepedia pe batha writer ban raha hai u are nothing in real life! now block me cause i dont care cause people like you are just dumb!and will stay dumb!

0

1

0

058ef74556c682e3

I fully understand, the whole point of the message was to gently remind you about the issue, not to slap a huge warning on your page like some editors feel the need to do.

0

0596d2109997148d

" Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT) The ""offending"" list was taken ""copy and paste"" from Terminus Centre-Ville (AMT) OMIT Ville de Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu A single-city authority (OMIT No. Route Name Route Map Schedule Departure Area96-E Montreal / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Express)Schedule and Information Gate 18196-SE Montreal / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Super Express)Schedule and Information Gate 1896-L Montreal / Brossard / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Local service)Schedule and Information Gate 1796-LH Montreal / Brossard / Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Local Extended Service)Schedule and Information Gate 17 No ""sand box"" needed nor required. Make the corrections as need be, but do not just delete. "

0

0598dbef8f8309ff

You want to have a little read of wp:AGF, but don't worry, because that is a bridge we will cross in good time.

0

0599c8151fe6a0e7

" History (Quote from copy) ""On January 11, 2012, operators of the Web site for participants of the Challenge and Active Lifestyle programs learned that the site had been hacked, resulting in the release of personal information of the participants.[4] The President's Challenge site displayed a notice that it was down for ""Site Maintenance – We're taking a little breather.""[5] On January 20, 2012, the site was modified to explain the hacking.[6] On January 27, 2012, The President's Challenge sent out emails to its participants saying that the Web site was functional as of January 24, 2012, and asked participants to reset their user passwords.[7][8]""(End quote) Can somebody explain why these notes are included? I suggest deleting them on the following grounds: The hacking incident was not a milestone event in the history of this movement. By this I mean it did not change the name or the aim of the organization. It did not amount to a major disruption to the program, and it seems trivial compared to all other items in the History section. "

0

059af4bed7d1a9c0

Information is not knowledge. That is funny. I wonder how high heights can you reach defending the nonsense.

0

059e4008b194cd3d

" Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Bo'ness, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles. If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:LuK3my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) "

0

05c3d4e151c59367

In the spirit of goodwill, I'm willing to nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, and outside editors will discuss whether Wikipedia should keep it. Would you like to provide a brief overview of the reasons why the article should be deleted for the benefit of editors? Please make it as succint as possible. (talk)

0

05c3da5274053003

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VI (February 2008) The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on by

0

05c5a12934de785e

Adding to this commentary, there is an article on the Sunda Plate. Regards,

0

05c865634bc46cd3

Naamswijziging Hi Ucucha, I did this request, apparently on the wrong place. Could I ask you to fix it? I would say it can easily be done by removing Songtsän Gampo and renaming Songtsen Gampo to Songtsän Gampo, as Tibetologist likes. There's not really a need to merge histories, I would say, because nothing has changed in the article. Can you do that or should it not be done that way on English Wikipedia? Regards,

0

05d0748deddb8102

" Re Dont throw a warning at me, and do not call my edits vandalism. I just told you why I reverted your edit. Those links may not fully comply with the rule, but they are good sites, whether you think they are or not. I'll prove it. If you had bothered to navigate through those sites you would see: Mew Mew Power Uncensored Analyzes the difference between Tokyo Mew Mew and Mew Mew Power. Gives info about the manga and anime series. I actually checked, and that info is correct. Gives month and date when the manga was translated and when 4kids licensed Tokyo Mew Mew, when they changed the name, etc (actually look through the site. Analyzes each episode and lists all the differences as much as possible. THen gives how much of the original content was kept. Mew Mew Alliance HAS THE ACTUAL PRESS RELEASES FROM 4KIDS RELATING TO MEW MEW POWER. new relating to Mew Mew Power, such as when it was aired in other countries. and just to think you could seen of this yourself, if you took the time to actually navigate through the sites. JUSTICE IS SERVED! "

0

05d1ffc0bd6198f1

It's exactly the same template. There are not two templates.

0

05e2495e208c5a0c

I'm very sorry, , that I will be unable to help with Peer Reviews for the foreseeable future. I'll remove my name from the list to forestall any further confusion.

0

05e670deb7c848bc

No, that is why I created a wiki

0

05eab71c908629af

Saudi-Arabia provided more assistance to Hamas than Iran? Prove? In the article it says this Iran has provided funding to Hamas but more funding has come from Saudi Arabia and also from the Sunni Arab countries like Qatar, UAE etc. and refers to this article: http://www.economist.com/node/12959539?story_id=12959539 But this claim quoted above is not traceable anywhere in the article. Therefore I ask to remove that part, please.

0

05ec6b9058d76d78

I have asked an admin... ...to block me for 24 hours to give me an enforced cooldown away from some of the idiots infesting these pages of late.

0

05edd7567585078e

" re: your message Hi Salle81, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page .69 talk "

0

05f2fd106ef1dda9

hey you have a giant penis. is that what allows you to moderate wiki so well? 8==============D>>>>>>><><>

1

0

1

0

1

0

05f53f5cdea5fdcf

regarding your most recent comment on mytalk page go ahead. do it. it's my school IP and they make legitimate edits. LOLOLOL

0

05f5fecc53f786c7

The SarekOfVulcan was forum shopping

0

05fe59bc56d37233

facebook moshav alma applications · facebook free Skype to Skype calls Trial software Members Photos Sharing Application Choose from thousands of FREE apps

0

0607806e67b420f6

Tell me why Irondome put the Western wall (not in Israel) in Israel. Give me the real reason.

0

060cd6129a7f9985

" Your edits are blatant POV, they don't follow WP:MOS, they read like an advertisement, and the text is probably copied from somewhere on the Ares website; which would be a copyright violation. Also, please explain how I am using Wikipedia as a personal blog, and how my edits are inaccurate. BTW, you've been reverted by another editor. — MP5 "

0

061419fffb8386f7

" Bad Agendas written in to this article Hello folks, I'm not a wiki-writer. I just use it from time to time. But I am familiar with problems when some pages have points of view and agendas written in to them, and the American Civil War articles are rife with these problems. You'd think the war was still on. This article on the 43rd Battalion is generally very good, but someone has done their best to wreck the ship, nevertheless. A paragraph in this article goes off-track and attempts to paint a picture that these soldiers were ""guerillas"". Anyone familiar with the writings of the war knows this word was used extensively and daily in newspapers, official US Army reports and accounts to refer to not just uniformed soldiers of the CS Army, but to any and all people of the South. To discuss the use of this term in this article is a coy trick to insert an agenda, intended to disparage, vice simply communicate good Wiki information about this topic. ""Guerilla"" was so commonly used as a term in this war, that it cannot be said, at all, that this term applied to, or was used more commonly for any one unit or group in the war, than any other. If editors continue to keep this slant and bias in the article, and contiue deleting other fair contributions which are neutral, then my comment here serves as a marker to future editors of the proof of the problem in this page, and the particular set of self-chosen watch-guards who intend to keep it here, while pretending they are not the root cause of the problem."

0

0618cd56fb5411be

May 2008 (UTC) Three comments about NPOV The second paragraph in this article links to 5 specific and very negative reviews. However, no positive reviews are provided. Instead, readers are provided to the wiki entries for religious right, conservative and creationist. Since Rotten Tomatoes was used as a primary source for ratings, could this sentence be updated to include at least one link to a positive film critic review? As mentioned in Wikipedia:NPOV, even minority viewpoints cannot be completed ignored (and in this case, minority viewpoint should not be applied since the minority viewpoint is the thesis of the film). There seems to be a large discrepancy between film critic/scientific community reception of this film and popular opinion (user reviews) of this film. Popular opinion votes on Internet websites are not considered a reliable source, but in this case, since Rotten Tomatoes was already used as a primary source for this portion of the article, could this section be updated to include a reference to popular reception to this film, with a link to the Rotten Tomatoes User Reviews? (368 reviews, 184 positive, 50% rating at the time of this edit). Google user reviews for this film (an aggregate, largely from epinions.com) show a similar 2.6/5 or 52% positive rating. Why is this film being treated so much differently than Fahrenheit 9/11. In this entry, there is no reference to film critic opinion or popular opinion of the film even though the reception was [nearly as extreme] (except positive, not negative - 85% at Rotten Tomatoes) 11:25, 5

0

06198359fbc89cb2

The sentences didn't need to be linked. Semi-colons are progressively seen as old fashioned. Statistically, their use has continuously and rapidly declined. Amongst academics, two separate sentences are presently seen as better.

0

061eabacdc10493b

Sorry, but I was not attempting to vex anyone. Anti or pro-homeopathy, what difference does it make? Please AGF.

0

061fcb89709e4b61

how much? Do you spend weekly on toilet paper???

0

062569ff543a829a

Regarding edits made June 10 2008 to Platte River Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. 71.237.79.210

0