id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
111f226450ab3438
Dees quote There is no consensus to delete the Dees quote. There are several editors who want it to stay. I ask you to leave it in. We can arbitrate the matter, if you want.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11229e79c6ff2f8d
what happened, is the protocol of the Zionist, don't let you speak goodly about Jews? 77.126.147.117
0
0
0
0
0
0
1122e1a435c80b10
I'll look into it. Also, we could get a picture of a cross section of soil with horizons, eh?
0
0
0
0
0
0
1123357ed730185b
how dare you. How can you call yourself a noble wikipedian, or an admin, I don't even know if you are an admin but if you are, you are a very unprofessional one and should have that status taken away. It is against Wikipedia rules to taunt another wikipedian and by persisting to call me dude you are doing that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
112a697ba337eb26
" Barstar Thanks for the barnstar, I greatly appreciate it. BW21.lackWatch21 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
112ae4147207059b
" You know, I do strive to develop that NPOV but, I have to admit, I fall short sometimes. Hell, I'm only human. But you, on the other hand, seem to have the discipline and skill to stay fantastically NPOV and never waver. It's really something to see. Now, should we move on to discussing how the quotes above might best be incorporated into the article? For one thing, I think that they clearly contradict Rawat's 1999 quote that suggests that a lot of these ""big"" ideas about him occured when he was ""only eight"" but that he's done what he could as an adult to disabuse them. What his organization published here in 1979 suggests quite the opposite. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
112da6ce2bf517df
Note: The same applies to Uda owita and Udispattuwa. They will be deleted if content is not forthcoming.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1138422b4ab8685e
August 2006 (UTC) You two ever think of taking turns, each turn to last 2 days, make all the additions you want? Proposed deletions must be quoted on discussion page before deletion? WP:CITE and WP:V kind of suggest this sort of useable approach in a problematic area. Sheesh, I thought I had problems where I'm editing ! 03:46, 18
0
0
0
0
0
0
113b40b3a16539a9
" List of USN ships Hello, I've been doing some updating and correcting on the article List of current ships of the United States Navy. I see that you contributed a great deal to article previously. At one point, with about a half dozen edits, you added 24 ships to the section ""Ready Reserve Force ships"". You listed them all as belonging to the Cape Ducato class, however that is a class of only 5 ships. I'm wondering if you had other info that stated these other 19 ships were considered a part of that class? If not, then if you have some free time, would mind stopping by the article and help correct this? From what I've (briefly) read, most of these ships are from various sources, builders and countires. Some are listed as ""Type C7 ships"", while others don't have any such designation. Anyway, any help help you could provide would be appreciated. - '''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
113de93b7bbbd454
I'm testing the bureaucracy, but I believe that I've been unfairly blocked and that further explanation is warranted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1141d532b170240f
I'm still awaiting an explanation as to why my careful and accurate sourcing of statements in this article was vandalized while I was away during the past three weeks. When I added the archival sources many months ago, they were approved by a Wikipedia editor. Moreover not only were the archival references recently vandalized, but also the reference to my published article in Brief Chronicles, a peer-reviewed academic journal, was deleted. These archival sources cannot be characterized as 'original research'. As noted earlier on this page, Alan Nelson's book is merely a series of quotations from these same archival sources stitched together with a bit of commentary. If my transcripts of these archival sources (readily available to everyone on my webpage) are 'original research' and thus to be banned under Wikipedia's policy, then so is Alan's book, for the same reason, namely that it's largely a series of quotations from archival sources. And as stated earlier, Alan misinterprets these sources, thus generating factual errors. For example, re the Brincknell incident, Alan deliberately conflates William Waters, one of the jurors in the coroner's inquest into the death of Thomas Brincknell, and Oxford's servant, William Walter. On p. 48, Alan writes of the coroner's inquest that: >The 17 jurymen were, however, as compliant as the jury was packed: one juryman, William Waters, was Oxford's own servant.< Alan clearly knew this statement to be false since he himself transcribed the testimony of Oxford's servant, William Walter, in a 1599 lawsuit in which William Walter described himself as being 50 years of age on 8 May 1599. See Alan's transcript at: http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/RUSWEL/ruswel07.html Oxford's servant, William Walter, was thus almost the same age as the 17-year-old Oxford at the time of Thomas Brincknell's death, and could not possibly have served on a jury at that age. The juryman William Waters was obviously an entirely different person from Oxford's servant, William Walter. Because he did not like the jury's finding that the death was the result of Brincknell's own actions, Alan deliberately made a false statement about one of the jurors to impugn the jury's finding. This is merely one among dozens of examples I could cite which demonstrate that no 'fact' stated in Alan's book can be accepted without checking it against archival documents. Nina Green
0
0
0
0
0
0
1143c72f07ed1b0f
notable cat is nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooootable I don't see why Longcat keeps getting removed from this list. First, he wasn't notable enough to warrant his own article, which is true, so it was suggested it would be moved to a list such as this. Now it keeps getting baleeted, while things like Limecat stay. Longcat is much more prevalent than Limecat, so I don't see why one stays while the other gets baleeted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
114464bbf8502069
, 2 September 2010 (UTC) In my humble opinion this draft is a pathetically watered-down rendition of what's been discussed and usually agreed upon by everyone except you-know-who. Denazification reduced to half a sentence? Gimme a break. 03:59
1
0
0
0
0
0
1147c5b5a631b46e
"In that case as ScoBrit is your brother and uses the same computer, per Sharing an IP address you both ""should disclose the connection"" particularly as your interests are very similar and you ""(edit) in the same areas, particularly on controversial topics"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
115377b4116a3670
Thank you for your reply. I'm glad that you are fully informed of your rights (which was my intent), and I fully agree with everything you say in your response. All the best,
0
0
0
0
0
0
1154e8e807e235d2
=This Article is Terrible Honestly, one of the worst philosophy articles on Wikipedia.
1
0
0
0
0
0
115935d67758d3e2
By the way, now that I've read your entire blog entry, it's excellent and I totally agree with you. It's just not appropriate to link here. If it were, there would be a thousand such links in HRC's article. A more appropriate way to do this might be to add a paragraph to the article, and link to your blog as the source, something like: Hillary faces two major obstacles to getting elected in 2008. The last Northeasterner and the last Senator elected president was John F Kennedy in 1960. Prior to that, the last senator elected president was Benjamin Harrison in 1888. Someone may still object to it, but it's much more subtle this way, and Wikipedia loves text with sources much more than external links. Also, remember to sign your responses on this page using four tildes, as shown above.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1161124edc250648
I removed the POV tag in regards to not using the ANP stuff. If there's a more legitimate reason, feel free to add it back. talk-contribs
0
0
0
0
0
0
11641505a0f7b648
" Hello Marilee0107, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump"
0
0
0
0
0
0
11678141f7bb592b
don't revert others people work on speculation of npv violations with even bothering to explain why you reverted. I mentioned simple facts of ms not paying any fines imposed by the e.u. i said i didn't have the time to source it, but google it and you ll find the sources there and then. And try getting out of the house for a walk once in a while.
0
0
0
0
0
0
116c81247025860b
Sure, no problem. I obviously do not have any position in the dispute, but if the other side continues to insist the article is not notable I will advise taking it to AfD again. This is just not a speedy deletion material.
0
0
0
0
0
0
116e4d55a93f530c
I have added the 2003 invasion of Iraq, since from a technical stand point (as well as statement by the US Department of State as well as the United Nations) it is in clear violation of the pact.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1170417d8f180de8
" Ah, is that a personal attack I sense? The fact is, as much as I'd like to say Serbia is independent of Montenegro right now..it isn't. Until Montenegro ""becomes"" an ""actual"" sovereign nation, it is still Serbia and Montenegro (and Kosovo is still part of that:))))))). Talking about geography, I would advise you take a peak at this.... ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1173051c68b93ff1
Proabivouac, you are very ungrateful. I, myself added the views of Leila Ahmed to the article. I found this source hardly in a journal. Sigh! I found it last night and now you are welcoming me with this warm comment. All I added was my most sincere efforts in reflecting what academic scholars think.
0
0
0
0
0
0
117315fbad139729
Albums, Eps, Mixtapes I gave you a list of reliable sources. I gave you one for Elektric Blue, Lovechild, and her new album. I gave sources about her mixtapes and eps and it proves that they are valuable to being apart of the profile and discography. And you didn't get the sources i will provide them again, shortly.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11768f5481c934fa
" Oh, so I was blocked from editing everything but my own page, which is the location of the alleged ""personal attacks,"" anyone can see that this makes little sense. If you are ever subject to an RFA, I'll be there. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1176a1dbde4d67c5
EDIT: Icarus_of_old, the registered user I told you about, has again replaced the labiodental (correct) [ɱ] with the dental (uncorrect) [n]. Could you please restore the right pronunciation and elucidate that it is he the one who is mistaking?
0
0
0
0
0
0
117978a4169ed2f0
" Sorry you feel that way, but aparently you don't understand that you don't WP:OWN WP. .Alpaugh "
0
0
0
0
0
0
117b9ae26cda2490
I think you'll find they are major duhhhh. Im changing the genre, its offensive and ignorant and we've had several complaints-
0
0
0
0
0
0
117d12bba6990b3f
thanks, I just noticed someone is trying to tfd our scoutlogo template, don't see why. He didn't even list it properly.
0
0
0
0
0
0
117e0a76edd07ee1
Best wishes Ian, I am sorry to see this sad state of affairs. I noticed your first revert on karate when I got home from the karate dojo last night and considered dropping you a line about the extent of grappling in karate from my own experience. I was however quite exhausted from doing a lot of grappling and picking myself up off the floor numerous times. In my style, Shotokan, the philosophy is to take out an opponent with one blow (ippon) so as to be ready for any others, but we still train in grappling and escapes quite a lot. The movements in any kata can be interpreted in many ways, from the obvious to very complex applications from apparently simple movements. There is no way of knowing if the ancient masters who composed the classic katas had these in mind. I hope this block will soon be lifted as you are an excellent editor and I urge any admins reviewing this to do so.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11804f5d33ac7e4a
I see you only use the talk page when it's my version that's the current version and all go crazy, yet you all go silent and not give a damn when it's your version that's the current version so don't lecture me on trying to force my own version on the article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1182fb8da91c9ddc
Anyway, nice to have you here briefly. I'm sincerely sorry that you won't be returning to my talk page. Just as I probably won't return to yours, unless - sadly - you continue to grace mine with your sincerity. I think we can breathe easy: no witch is going to hex you further; and no witch is going to further mutilate poor Peterson. My sincerest farewell.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11847bcb5c332858
intrusive, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. As a registered user, you gain the use of an appropriate username of your choice, a personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you, the ability to start new pages, and much more. Also, your IP address, 84.100.98.240, will no longer be visible to other users.|}} Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.{{#if:|| }}{{#if:||
0
0
0
0
0
0
1184b426177b8ff8
Hello,sorry to waste you're time hello, sorry to waste your time.I'm sure you are very busy,but you are a faggot?
1
0
0
0
0
0
1186ad440fe32d34
" Not I; I just don't like being forcibly separated from friends and never being able to find my way back; always some damn referendum or something. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
118dc5a56b60afd6
" The above paragraph illustrates that the axis to this entire debate is your misunderstanding of WP:SELF. More specifically: your mistaken definition of ""reference"". WP:SELF seeks to avoid encyclopediac references. This means that all the facts of all articles come from the source and never from another article. The reason for this is clear. You, however, choose to define ""reference"" very liberally, and take it to mean that Wikipedia should never include anything about Wikipedia, which of course is silly. Somehow you've come to believe you are the last word on what is and is not relevant, despite press coverage and vast consensus to the contrary. McCarthyism is alive and well on Wikipedia. What's funny is these little witch hunts for irrelevance are so restricted in scope, and totally arbitrary in their focus. Do us a favor and go take your fervor over to Christina Aguilera. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
118f804f5fc6d7cd
...Ugh, no, I forgot about all that stuff on Daniel Brandt's page... I sincerely apologize to Tarc for that. I registered on Wikipediocracy a few days ago out of curiosity (I think it was mentioned somewhere among the Manning furore) and ran into some of Tarc's posts on there... he mentioned me at one point, so I Googled his name because I really didn't like the idea of him digging into me off-site on public forums. Obviously I found Brandt's page, but I was just looking for forum posts and the like... I meant to just link to Tarc's Wikipedia Review posts. Somehow I forgot to actually do that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
118fed5b15b93cd0
" bad faith exhibited: Terms like ""fundie"" and linking BSF to a political movement the Christian Right which has done some good things but some stupid things also, it shows bad faith. Calling me a Bible literalist even though I explicitly said I was not is bad faith. MickWest making imperious edits over and over again until you are told to stop by Mark that is bad faith. Duncharrris not acknowledging my excellent sources like medical historians, etc is bad faith. Not following the minority view policy which says ""there is no size limit to Wikipedia"" and the minority view can go into ""great detail"" is bad faith. I have not attempted to censor the anti-BSF view unless they are making stuff up with no sources and turning the article into a editorital page. Now what is the silence about some of these issues but bad faith? Again, you cannot reason with the unreasonable. The central issue Now the anti-BSF wants a mainly popular view article in a minority view article. I say if you want that start your own article. I don't really care if you do. Wikipedia has the minority view article policy whether you like it or not. kdbuffalo"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1192a9f359c30e18
It was a mistake in doing the 'help' thing - actually was asking aobut the 'en' thing.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11954a4b60d6a1d2
":You didn't ask for ""China specialists"", you asked for academics. There's a difference between the two. And in any case you seemed to know what to find, so why play a game and ask me to provide you with a list? Schram does praise the book. Nathan had more criticisms to make nd only expressed a belief that the book could be valuable. Furthermore, why isn't Baum a ""China specialist""? He's written books on Mao and the Cultural Revolution. He's also part of UCLA's Center for Chinese Studies. Also if people like Goodman, Bernstein (focus on politics) is a ""China specialist"" then I think Michael Yahuda's opinion is at least notable. Lastly and most importantly, how does being a ""China specialist"" make you better able to consider the book than a historian who does not focus on China? If some of the greatest weaknesses of the book are historiographical, any historian should be able to spot them. Indeed, does someone who specialises in politics like Goodman have that historical grounding that would be useful? Not suggesting he doesn't, just wondering. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11986d025efd708f
" The tagging for CSD actually had some basis, as the assertion of notability was not properly sourced. However, it could and now has been adderssed. The Slovenia wiki article, while interesting, is itself unsourced... but this is likely due to they have entirely different considerations for inclusion than enWiki. So that link has now been moved per WP:LAYOUT. Its available to readers but cannot be used to assert or confirm notability on enWiki. And naturally, being a mass murderer is pretty much a given for notability... per guideline in enWiki it must be properly sourced. The original single ref was to user-generated content on a non-reliable source, and so did not meet criteria. A much more suitable and definitely Reliable Source has been added, so the questionable source can either be removed or ignored. Further, I have tagged the article for expansion and requested the attention of experts. '''' MICHAEL Q.'' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11a47b59b3016482
" Mein Gott that was fast! Thanks. The kelly pool pic is a good thing. Picture worth a thousand words there. A couple of side topics: What do you think about the recent (today) addition to the glossary of ""killer pool""? Seems to me we don't describe games in a glossary (not sure if the game is even notable enough for an article). Since you may be more familiar than me with licensing at commons, do you think I can properly upload an ebay auction picture showing the cover of the 1923-24 Brunswick pool table catalogue; what would be the licensing, PD-old? (if you aren't familiar with such issues, don't bother, just thought you might know off the top of your head). I like all the recent changes to balkline except for the last. The old image and description gives the article an air of ""we are dealing with a long history of historic importance."" It also serves as a more general (and very interesting image) until people can follow along with the more detailed images and their descriptions later in the article. Also, the image you took from later in the article was tailored to the section it appears in and with a description that will be meaningless until readers have reached that point in the text, not to mention that the article was balanced with images and now has a hole at the end. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11a69af2475337ba
Ways to improve Cordoba African Film Festival 2012 Hi, I'm Compdude123. Evastia, thanks for creating Cordoba African Film Festival 2012! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Template:Traducción does not seem to exist. Please correct the name of the template The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11a9364573d1da27
, 13 December 2005 (UTC) I'm from Bulgarian Macedonia and since the end of Yugoslavia I have to change the name of my region, cause some other people want to monopolise something that they don't have (less than 50%) and historically don't deserve. At least they can give the opportunity for others to use the name Macedonia. How can I describe my region? Macedonia (Pirin), bordering Macedonia? Am I Macedonian, or not? And then if Macedonian I'm not Bulgarian? I can be Bulgarian Macedonian and they can be Slav Macedonians and Greeks can be Macedonians but they don't want to and you support them, they want to monopolise the name. I suggest that we change the name of teh country to FYROM 19:20
0
0
0
0
0
0
11aa5c89272bf7fd
" ""considered the greatest = POV. greatest = fact, assuming you qualify and validly substantiate the given criterion. Is wiki about facts, then, or POV? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11adcbba15464149
"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Malala Yousafzai/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) I will review. ★★★★ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11b244de5c3e031f
After the Suppression of the Society of Jesus]
0
0
0
0
0
0
11ba970e613094b3
" The substantiation is WP:NPOV. Read it. —  ✉ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11c35b59ca4e74e0
" I used to but the fact is I don't have the time to, especially since most of the vandals I revert are like one time editors and never edit much again so its just a waste. If I huggle or something it would be easyer but I don't. ''' message me! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11c83b27f5e83f82
Hi, why did you delete the section about Shmuly being a convert? What was wrong with it? Thank you 184.177.112.118
0
0
0
0
0
0
11cec423a05e4cff
" RfA thanks , thank you you so much for validating my RfA! I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have taken both the positive and constructive on board. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please let me know, ditto if you see me stumble! Thanks again for your much appreciated support. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11d2fe3e1be1a629
Image:Megaphone_screenshot.jpg I have tagged Image:Megaphone_screenshot.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11d36cd0eabbd58b
" November 2009 Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. dafax "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11d48e1b5ce2e30a
" This looks like pretty obvious WP:UNDUE weight to a WP:FRINGE publication. Just because something is verifiable does not mean we should publish it - verifiability is merely a prerequisite for inclusion, not a guarantee. In this instance I can't see what it adds to an article not relevant to socialism to include the views of a socialist publication. If the argument is that it's not because it's a socialist publication then this critic is on par with any other random magazine critic and is superfluous. Either way, my !vote is to remove talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11e3166864c86fd6
The 'magic' code I've changed my mind. Whether or not the code is relevant doesn't matter. The fact is, it's completely out of sync with the rest of the page and Stephen Hawking would find it hard to follow. Keep it deleted
0
0
0
0
0
0
11e355930e954704
I bet that makes your little peepee stand up tall doesn't it little man? Gloating is not nice, but it does show your true immature nature.
1
0
0
0
0
0
11e494ee925e5efc
My, Seth, I'm impressed on how you took control. You seem like a guy who knows what he wants and gets it. Where do you live? You could stop by my apartment and show me just how forceful you are. I'm not old enough for a wild night ;).
0
0
0
0
0
0
11f058f5c771ccc0
Mrschimpf is an wikipedia troll.
1
0
0
0
0
0
11f16628c1720d18
You're the one who said you didn't want a scientific article! You wanted an article about how the words are actually used throughout histsory. Thus I found an actual legal definition from the world's sole super power at the start of the 21st century and you take it out just because you don't agree with it. And yet you allow all this unreferenced unofficial crap about non-African blacks even while complaining about no references? That's completely hypocritical!
0
0
0
0
0
0
11f276328553138d
I hate this site. But you know, I'll do everything in my power to make sure each and every one of you fucking nerds pays. I hope you all burn in fucking hell you bastards. Go fuck yourselves.
1
0
1
0
1
0
11f33d9b2c6581da
":::::I take your response as ""apology accepted"". Thanks. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
11f36d40923054b6
etymology I can not edit the main page, so i will put it here so that some admin can insert it in the article. Eliphant is derived from sanskrit word hanti(s) meaning elephant (literally meaning having large hands). The Arabs took this word and put El (the) before it and it passed into Italian as elephanti and from there on made its way into other European languages. Do you just know this or do you have references to support it? References would be better.
0
0
0
0
0
0
11f66f5616c690ab
U are a bitch nigga. Fuck u and the guy who blocked cookiesandboobs. 4rom mynameisearl0
1
0
1
0
1
1
11fcd27c311abb1b
Thanks. I have added a link to the list of state conventions to the SBC template. The template is too long. You may want to comment at Template talk:Southern Baptists#List of People.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1201f880f02742bc
" The ""corporate sell-out"" began in 1981 when the Cubs were sold to the Tribune. This still doesn't merit more than one sentence. It's just another way to raise money to pay these yahoos' inflated salaries. What's up, Doc? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1202e41456976518
" User who should take this advice It's time to stop editing Wikipedia. You are still welcome to read the articles, but no more editing, because you are not able to follow the rules. - (talk · contribs) Yes, that was my advice. Blanking my talk page again while trying to leave me a message indicates you still aren't able to edit Wikipedia well, and should simply enjoy reading it. - (talk · contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12092184b58e1e55
Sega Exodus Sega Exodus has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12112086f80eb443
Just a suggestion for the Super smash Bros series page If you follow the talk page for Brawl: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl It has a warning about adding YouTube videos, perhaps you should add that warning to the series page? All the best.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12117d1f706af05a
" Decline on User talk:GoldmanSachsAnalyst I've reversed you and unblocked this user. The user was blocked for a username violation, and while his conduct since then hasn't been terrific, it's certainly not conduct we'd block a new contributor for, especially without warnings. juicetalk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1211dd8f67510a1c
Silver fields symbol SF on the TSX Venture is looking at some properties around Zacatecas.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1215cbb7fd55aecf
article. Just responded on the
0
0
0
0
0
0
1217f9f47c6259ba
He He I will take your word for it that article is pov as it is I guess but I will definately send Kaspersky a log about this pop up your getting cheers 109.150.60.235
0
0
0
0
0
0
121bc2c1d6e3fe89
Indeed. This is the very reason why I am no longer editing this article: your personal attacks. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
122a4b51efb9f1f8
I will kill you with my gun asshole!
1
0
1
1
1
0
1231290e990ca26b
" ""River Manche"" The term ""River Manche"" has been used to describe the Rhine's course after confluance with the Thames or the Seine during the last glaciation. Is this accurate and worth mentioning?128.240.229.3 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12353f1324df158c
info for your curiosity Credibility_node_ue
0
0
0
0
0
0
12354201bf69a812
":::::::::::::::Prove it is false. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
123989ec56ec7535
Arbcom You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Allegations of administrator misconduct and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Requesting Arbitration; Wikipedia:Arbitration guide. Thanks,. Final step. I expect to receive plenty of criticism from this, but please try to be WP:CIVIL.
0
0
0
0
0
0
123ac5168a9a9117
" ""Most of the soures"" don't have to. TR didn't have to. Merely using it to identify a form of corruption establishes it, especially if the author is the POTUS viewing the corruption from the inside. The word ""conspiracy"" is not used here. Converging interests of a powerful few suffices to produce the same effect. Nothing is said here about campaign finance, although that is understood. There must be much about campaign finance that is illegal or secret, otherwise people wouldn't keep going to prison, but ""illegal or secret"" isn't the requirement for corruption. Merely self-serving and dishonest will do, all the more if on a massive scale."
0
0
0
0
0
0
124cc37edb9f1b56
" Norwegian Name I am a bit surprised by the Norwegian name for Týr being given as Ty. Since Týr is hardly a common subject of everyday conversation, I accept the possibility that this may have changed without me noticing, but I am Norwegian and I have never heard the version Ty. In books, in conversations and in primary school classes on Norse mythology I have only ever come across Tyr. On Norwegian Wikipedia the article on the god himself is titled ""Ty"", but in the article on Norse mythology he is listed as Tyr, which makes it all the more confusing. Can anyone enlighten me on this point? Has there simply been a spelling change I have missed, or what? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
124d1432c3c9385f
Thanks for the comforting reply. I just thought that in an RfA, users would review my contributions to RFCN, and worry that I would block innocent users (which, I wouldn't do; administrator or not: I would still request comment on names).
0
0
0
0
0
0
12508df370bfb38b
" Jokestress, enough! Multiple times you've come to this article and attempted article ownership in an abrasive manner, telling everyone that their edits are ""crap"". It's rude and disrespectful. If you were really interested in a logical discussion on the manner, you wouldn't have started it off so belligerently. Also, if you'd read the sources carefully instead of just trying to impose your will and get your way to feel satisfied, you'd know that they're perfectly legitimate sources. Lampanelli was even interviewed on the TMZ source.173.0.254.229 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1252339afcb59add
[email protected]'s vandalism This article has been repeatedly vandalised by [email protected]. who appears from this and other discussions to be an obsessive compulsive individual with a record of anti-Catholic bigotry (not an issue in this instance). Rms125 has deleted properly researched contributions with unfounded and poorly written passages of which the misidentification of Alzira's paternal grandfather as her father is only one. This is the kind of action that render Wikipedia suspect. A pity.
0
0
0
0
0
0
125f4f98e664d612
So, Necrothesp, let's get this straight. You wrote an article on a woman whose crowning achievement seems to be that she ran a pottery company for something a bit over a year before World War II, with her husband, and yet you doubt the notability of a woman who has curated at least nine exhibitions over a period of 20 years at one of Australia's most important art galleries and continues to do so? Should I remind you that four years later your article only has one reference, no notes and no external links? It's not that I dislike the disambiguation page. I'm all for it, and would certainly agree with adding a reference to a disambiguation page on this one, once the move has been made. But it seems entirely sensible to me to have a page for the only entry that's currently for someone unambiguously called Julie Robinson at the address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Robinson and have the disambiguation page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Robinson_(disambiguation). If someone else more notable comes along with a claim to that exact address, I'd happily support her taking this page, too.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12642f6b770f58d6
" User:70.81.117.175 I'm glad to see that you've banned this user for a long time, but I can't help but feel an even longer block is in order. As you can see from their block log they've repeatedly been given long blocks (2 weeks, 3 weeks, 2 months, and now 3 months) and it hasn't done anything to stop this user. I've been following this user for probably 6 months now, and I've pretty much looked at every edit they have made. I have yet to find one single ""good"" edit that they have done. Every edit they do is about ""ethnic"" things, either inserting their strangely skewed demographics numbers, or en-masse inserting of ethnic categories to articles on people without providing a single source (I have a feeling they are basing their addition of these categories solely on the last name of the person). In every case Wikipedia is not better off by the edit this user has made. In addition, it is my belief that "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1264e8290cef21ac
thanks at least you explained it and I hope it is understood that I am not trying to create any trouble and I was being wrongly accused of whatever user babbaq was saying. He/She appears to be trying to prove a point or something. Thanks Again
0
0
0
0
0
0
126721a5dfb723a3
rowspan=9 colspan=8|Did Not Qualify
0
0
0
0
0
0
126d4426f6a7da37
A good first step is of course to answer the allegation, which I note you have failed to do even after repeatedly being given the opportunity to do so. It is
0
0
0
0
0
0
127447b1d1a36cde
That 5 clubs was very little, many pages that do not sourced. Go unpunished. And if PERSIB not lie, there is source. And please please please don't undo or reverting. If you undo, i will undo again. And again. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
12779c031413c6ed
Fool You are another fuckin moron on here along with Wobbs and Epf. So whats your ethnicity, Irish, Dutch, what is it ? You dont even know what ethnicity is about you fuckin douchebag. There is no modern British identity thats different then what it was before you fool. Foreign people and ethnicities/races dont count as British you fuckin puke-bag.
1
0
1
0
1
1
1278d2b0d936fc2b
I think should re think about my ban since I am in a process of inserting obicanibe's suggestions to Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka even his unverified claims looks very odd. You can visit Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka page and see the new content. Thanks
0
0
0
0
0
0
127ab95297d048e0
Inoculation, the future generations thank you for your demise.
0
0
0
0
0
0
127e2207cffcb366
" April 2006 (UTC) The American people did know through their elected representative. Are you arguing that the Government should have no classified information? No Spies? When Congress learned about the leak they wanted to know who leaked it, not the details of the program because they already knew. She is not a ""whistleblower."" We have ""whistleblower"" laws that recognize what is whistleblowing and what is felony crime of disclosing classified information. If she wanted to just ""whistleblow"", she could have contacted her Democrat congressperson and arranged a classified briefing. She used to be Special Assistant to Clinton so she should have known how to do this. Instead she chose to ""leak"" it in an illegal way. With all the options she had available, she chose the one that would cause the most political damage to the administration. One has to wonder why. 00:58, 24"
0
0
0
0
0
0
128acb5536139af0
I know that MadonnaTribe is a fansite. Nonetheless, almost all of their exclusives have later been confirmed by official sources, such as the full setlists of Madonna's two latest tours and titles of 5 songs off Madonna's Hard Candy album. As of now, their news item on the tracklisting is accessable from their front page, as a top news story. However, as I've already commented, the tracklisting hasn't been officially confirmed, and therefore, I agree that it shouldn't be included in the article itself for the moment. As for the release date, Warner Music Switzerland have updated their release plan to list a Swiss release date of September 18, 2009, which indicates an international release date of September 21. However, Madonna.com still mentions September 29 as the release date. 87.239.71.35
0
0
0
0
0
0
128de89d9f51c8b3
No need to ridicule the statement. Africa has great potential. If they can get together (at least no fighting) the future is going to be Africa. Also Met, no need for terms like United states of Africa, we know the place as the African continent.
0
0
0
0
0
0
129130e1696454ea
" he looks better with his hair not obscuring his ugly face which might I add appears to be covered in some sort of pearly substance "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1297d74a0352f548
Extended comments about this The comments by BritishWatcher show the problems at present. I gave him a simple choice, assume good faith and take me at my word, or buy the book. Instead he chose option C, whine and assume bad faith. He asserts I have not provided an alternate text written from the source instead of the current text. If he had bothered to read the discussion, he would realise I have said more than once that it is not possible to construct an accurate, non-misleading sentence that belongs in the lead of the article from that source. So I cannot do that. The problems are quite simple: The original sentence which was copied to the lead (complete with egregious modifications of the original sentence to mean something completely different!) did not match the source, and is therefore unsourced. It is impossible to construct an accurate, non-misleading sentence that belongs in the lead of the article from that source. Various editors have produced no sources at all to support any figures about injuries or opinions they have said should be included in the lead. Various editors refuse to allow an unsourced (as the text does not match the source in any way) sentence to be removed from the article. They are so insistent on retaining an incorrect, unsourced sentence. Not only that, they keep proposing equally incorrect, unsourced sentences that either cite zero sources or inaccurately cite the existing source. I have asked many times why the reader should be misled. It is quite telling that nobody dare give me a straight policy based answer to that question, especially when the protection policy allows for its removal. When one side's discussion involves nothing more than assumptions of bad faith, stalling, stonewalling and making things up from thin air, it is obvious where the problem lies.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12a10705f0f436dd
My advice to you is stop following me and go and edit your own articles or at least tell me which citations to improve etc instead of just sitting there and running your mouth all over the keyboard doing absolutely nothing besides trying to debase others.Just take a look at your discussion page User_talk:Sikh-history 90% of the people there are screaming at you! I don't think its me who has the problem here its you! I am trying so hard to find citations its very very hard to get them !! why don't you try!
1
0
0
0
0
0
12a1d0accb92f340
Dam thanks guys, I appreciate it for sure there guys, I guess I will fuck up more home pages that are against the law, because they basically suck a pigs ass you know????!!!!
1
0
0
0
0
0