id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14591fe6fa27b29d | "
Weedpatch Camp
Thanks for creating the article. I actually went on a photo-spree through parts of central CA several months ago, and when handling my childhood home around Kern, I took a photo of what turned out to be an inaccurately addressed Weedpatch Camp (I had taken a photo of the Sunset School, which was important in relation to the history of the area but not the NRHP site). I had a feeling something was fishy about the location, and some extensive internet research finally revealed what (and where!) the real buildings were. I then went back last September, while visiting my folks, to ""take care of unfinished business"". As a result I'll add some nice photos to your article. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
145e6958d140a6ec | ":::::Here's hoping for good health for you and your family, especially given the approaching holiday season. uniquenames
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
145e700be36330da | Anna of East Anglia
I have done some work on Anna in an effort to get it up to FA standard, noting what I have done in reply to your suggestions. Quite willing to work on the article some more if you feel it's not good enough. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
145eba230b2382d5 | Can we get registered edits unblocked?
This is a public IP so vandalism from here will be rampant but can edits from registered users be unblocked? 192.43.227.18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14646a6333cf2092 | Your username has been blocked | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
146984f9e7cecffd | Ahmedinejad
Please use only one account to revert. Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
146fcd3acb84e847 | it is true and where does it say i have to insert my references. so it is ok for you to add blog pages but i can add my facts to the story? what kind of sense is that? further more pornographic pages are not blog sites. your site is in violation of wikipedia rules......thank you...anoymous......bye sweetie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
147311990d050756 | A Diversion?
============
Two aliens landed in the Arizona desert near a gas station that was closed for the night. They approached one of the gas pumps and the younger alien addressed it saying, 'Greetings, Earthling. We come in peace. Take us to your leader.'
The gas pump, of course, didn't respond.
The younger alien became angry at the lack of response.
The older alien said, 'I'd calm down if I were you.'
The younger alien ignored the warning and repeated his greeting. Again, there was no response.
Annoyed by what he perceived to be the pump's haughty attitude, he drew his ray gun and said impatiently, 'Greetings, Earthling. We come in peace. Do not ignore us this way! Take us to your leader or I will fire!'
The older alien again warned his comrade saying, 'You probably don't want to do that! I really don't think you should make him mad.'
'Rubbish,' replied the cocky, young alien. He aimed his weapon at the pump and opened fire. There was a huge explosion. A massive fireball roared towards them and blew the younger alien off his feet and deposited him a burnt, smoking mess about 200 yards away in a cactus patch.
Half an hour passed until he finally regained consciousness. Refocusing his three eyes, he straightened his bent antenna, and looked dazedly at the older, wiser alien who was standing over him shaking his big, green head.
'What a ferocious creature!' exclaimed the young, fried alien. 'He damn near killed me! How did you know he was so dangerous?'
The older alien leaned over, placed a friendly feeler on his crispy friend and replied, 'If there's one thing I've learned during my intergalactic travels, you don't want to mess with a guy who can loop his penis over his shoulder and stick it in his ear.'
=============
Enjoy your evening
Doug
Time to Escalate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1477947900b40620 | test 3
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
147a98e2fa20b0a8 | ]]. Pakistan entered the tournament as the defending 2012 Asia Cup | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
147c2f4d011ff7af | "
Template:Mormon_jew
Looking at a new article called Groups Exiled from Judaism, and not quite sure what to make of it, I was shocked to see that the well-used Template:Jew has now been ""taken-over"" by a pro-Mormon user and a new similar-looking Template:Mormon_jew is now being utilised. This Mormon template plagiarises and makes confusing use of the original Template:Jew. The Mormon template must be radically changed ASAP. Your attention is needed. Perhaps we should follow official channels too. Thank you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1480d0bea6418fc0 | How do you explain this, this and this? — t | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
148457b79e16197c | R. P. / R
Pick a surname, one surname, and use it. 99.238.74.216 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
148a801809eae5b8 | "We do apologize. We are not ""schoolmates"" of David Pettersen, nor is this him, himself. Thank you for your time. Once again, we apologize and we can confirm that we are not the same person who wrote the previous articles. Like we may have said before, we are definitely assistants of his, and we will not write anymore about him within the near future.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
148ac9ae4ec83fd1 | Being original hasn't ever been my strong suit, so, here goes something cliched to death:
Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
149119e2af8309c9 | In my opinion it's a rather harsh opinion of someone who hasn't got the source to prove it! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14914007e07ae072 | I know. But some people make it hard. That guy just told my to add info to the talk page, never mind the external links section! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1493544bf9eabe40 | You are an idiot. NOTHING suggests that she needs to attend a hearing and NOTHING suggests a hearing is going to happen. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
149743b1843acd65 | Uhh..... Yes. - '''' - <*> | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
149ba10442e6cb3c | "
I've re-written the entry to make it more consistent with associated Wiki articles. I'm happy to have it reviewed. [BTW: anyone know who ""Abbott"" is?] 19:48, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
149e2cc8ff42ebf0 | Other unfair admins
Hi, we both have some interest in complexity and seek to provide the most informed and correct articles. can you help me deal with unfair and incorrect moderation on another article? Taipei_American_School they keep trying to censor my posts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
149ea53032378a47 | Another sucka found
YOU! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14a21cba059c0a43 | Stick to topics you are knowledgeable about. There are plenty of folks who are knowledgeable in industrial culture. Just because YOU'RE confused doesn't mean that the article lacks notability. Here. Set this in your mind as the lowest standards for notability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chocolate_Rain . The Church of the Subgenius has been featured on MTV, in the New York Times, Time Magazine, has members like Bruce Campbell, Mark Mothersbaugh, Robert Anton Wilson, Ken Kesey and has its own newsgroup. That should be plenty. Not to mention all the mentions of Rev. Magdalen in a variety of news sources in the last few years. Once again, you didn't do your homework very well. Now go ahead and blather some more, I'm through with you. 71.102.2.128 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14a95b04e4efbcac | "::Saju Bhai, no matter how hard you try they will never let you cite fair accounts of Zakir Naik. The media, including Wikipedia, is in the hands of people who just wont let us paint a fair picture about our heroes or our people. They call our people savages and an unlawful people, yet look at them not letting other users speak positively about others in the face of criticism and negative perspectives. They call this freedom of speech, freedom of expression, while barring us from sharing our views. Just like how Canada and Britain banned Zakir bhai, they do their best to stop our advancements - but they know not the Power of Allah. Insh'Allah, even with all this negative media, Zakir bhai will come out of this as a hero. And as for you Ari89 and SlimVirgin, may Allah either give you either hidiyaat or punishment for neglecting your duties as honest editors - Insh'Allah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.108.24.87
SAJU LOOK AT THIS LINK: http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135291§ionid;=351021815 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.146.172.146
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14a9664f21b5d79f | WRONG. If the leader disconnects, then the person who joined first after the leader becomes leader. 69.246.79.189 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14abd52d7f2642d1 | sandbox
Should I revert my new edit to that page? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14ae0916a81c69d0 | "
Personally, I don't believe the ""Controversy"" section is appropriate for this wiki at all. At best it is a minor matter of interest only to Exetel users, and for the very great majority of them, it was of no consequence at all.
There are wikis in place for several other Australian ISPs, and none of them have more than a description of the company and their services, plus links to some of their subsidiary companies, and some of their services. I think something similar is appropriate for the Exetel wiki, and that would appear to be what already exists.
Speaking of links, I also think that many of the links which are currently at the bottom of the Exetel wiki are also inappropriate and should be removed, specifically those that point to ""news"" stories and ""blogs"", as these have been prioven to be full of inaccuracies, misconceptions, and outright lies.
I have no idea what drives someone like Macktheknifeau and his fellows to conduct such a malicious, misinformed, and inane attack on a supplier of internet services, even if they have been wronged, and particularly after they have cancelled their service and moved-on to another supplier, but wikipedia is not the place to conduct such an attack. (if indeed anywhere is appropriate) DarkGaucho" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14b8d4de4cef61e2 | The only agenda of those editing the Bob Huff article is to make it a reliably sourced, objective, neutral piece of writing that is not plagiarized. PRSpeak is not appropriate for Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia, not your boss's web page. 70.134.228.224 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14c63e0e21ddb4e4 | ")
johnboywalton55 says ""you're a spastic!!!""
also ""Father Daley, reportedly had a big lump on the side of his head in the shape of Connaught."" (" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14c89f2a7f2f16fc | "
""The Whitewashers"", eh? Can't wait for the movie. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14ca7e2596b1b3c3 | "
Is the hypothesis in such a sorry state that references have to be repeated?
See the reference to Evans and McConvell.
And apart from Hale's venom, is there any chance of evidence ever being presented on this page?
Just saying that one has used the - gasp - comparative method isn't particularly convincing.
And these hundreds of cognates, where are they?
The mainstream appears to consist of Evans, McConvell and Bowern, more or less, with ""Nobody"" doing the cleanup - or mostly clicking the undo-link. Even Lyle Campbell, who should be pretty dispassionate about the subject calls for much more information and research and assigns Pama-Nyuangan the label of family status not confirmed.
And please don't let poor Medeis do all the rollup. He's just a camp follower.
Please present something convincing and, most of all, answer the question, whether Hale committed the sins of glottochronology and mass comparison. (Dubbing the last one lexicostatistics doesn't make it any more respectable.) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14cb27f8705c8d60 | "
RfC Response
Got here randomly from listing of RfCs on Community Page, but do have some academic background in sexual behavior. Have to say that aside from the first few paragraphs as I found them, which were good, this article is substantially tainted with junk and pseudo-science designed to legitimize or de-stigmatize male on female rape. Just because someone with initials after their name managed to get something published, or posted something on the net, does not make it good science. ""Encyclopedic"" should mean both ""known and recognized as good"" and ""comprehensive""; but ""known good"" should always trump ""comprehensive"". The vandalism (e.g. ""more pictures"") is also out of hand. There is also way too much plain and simple error (e.g. discussion of sex and aggression in other species falls in the realm of Comparative Psychology, not Sociology). I think you need to request major intervention by moderators on this topic. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14d85117905ab2dd | most certainly, if you can specify your concerns and locate the problem. one title would be more than enough for the last there section you created here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14de97bfe85225f4 | I have not been blocked. At no point did I try to edit Wikipedia to find myself blocked. It must have been a very short 'block' by a Wikipedian admin community aware that it wasn't entirely in the right in the matter.80.229.223.248 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14e4cb3ae7a49933 | that refers to commons:Template:Attribution-Ubisoft and otrs:20051200210003144 the ticket in questions does not release the images but rather is a request for information. βcommand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14e8bcac0e4cea74 | I would appriciate it if an administrator would contact me. Thank You. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14ed46999d66d334 | It is 397 words, compared to the present 467 words for the existing part of the history section that covers the same periods. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14f05d908b85f9ce | Very clever, faggot. 115.166.44.81 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
14f5e72856dc434c | Spotsdoes11
Hi, I am using my IP address because Orderinchaos has blocked me without your permission again. I haven't edited anything except the discussion page of my local MP. He obviously doesn't like me or wants anyone to edit the nicola roxon article. I just wanted to add info about my local MP. Is he really able to just block new users without checking with others? My IP is available for you to check 120.21.192.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14f803c4e15d92b8 | "
a hopeless case if - listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go
But it is a world of made. Thanks for that nonetheless. nableezy - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14fc73f5ae4ba7d6 | Ad copy
The plot summary reads like ad copy and is the goof really a goof? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1500b18061157089 | Axbridge external links
Hi, can i ask why you removed the link to Axbridge cricket club from the Axbridge page? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150463146a4275e9 | Captain Pugwash
How can an article about Synchro-Vox fail to mention Captain Pugwash?? It was a hugely popular cartoon. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150999558c017b97 | Hera abandoning the Trojans
The section in the text about Hera's hate for Ganymede seems to be incorrect.
[Her hate of him was applied by mythographers to account for her abandoning the Trojans, an otherwise inaccountable shift in the alliances of the Trojan War, for the Troad was part of the homeland of the Great Goddess, of whom Hera was the main Olympian representative.]
The reason for the war was the decision of Paris in the famous contest between goddesses Hera, Athene and Aphrodite. Hera was sure to take the other side in the war, as she wasn't the choice of Paris. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150f913a8c9e4ea9 | Nevermind above, I've removed the tag. Have a good day. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15129ca4c1d50259 | You, sir, are no quality editor. 79.97.171.208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15174b023022fa20 | Let the flame war begin
The title says it all. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15187c3925194c1a | 4th/ August
w0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000t
I killed KQ and we got Dragon chain!
w0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000tw0000000000000000t | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1519528831b26f1b | i understand that snails are VERY important to the diet of the juvinelle salamander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
151d88b38456fe3d | Your A little insignificant Mother's Lover
you motha fucka..what ya thnk of yr self..u dumb ass..u thnk u r v smart..u son of bitch.....
fuck your mother by | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1523e77981716045 | , and I feel JMLK's message was a bit smug and I could consider that as harassment.}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1526de2219e9ed95 | It seems quite obvious what is meant to me. I'd reached the same conclusion and turned to the Talk page to find it had already been spotted: the section shows nothing of the content or conclusions of a number of referenced sources, other than a vague hint that there is, perhaps, negative information about the organisation to be found if the linked sources are read. Perhaps someone should do a little footwork and state in the article itself what the various conclusions are, using the links as references / citations, as is standard practice in Wikipedia (and most other tertiary reference materials). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1529eb05b6f511f2 | Her nationality is certainly American, but her ethnicity appears to be Syrian. These are not incompatible. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152b266729019f5a | Hi
Hi,
I know Moukity is going around claiming things on September 11th and it has been a week since then but he needs to have a sock puppet investigation done on his account Higgys, as that was an account made to harass me with, and no such investigation was done. Could there maybe even be a block on him since the things he has been saying in his edit summaries? I know he claims he's not coming back on here and I wasn't on here either for a while until today when I went to the Rescue Heroes article and found his edit. This is getting ridiculous since when I make an account to get away from HIM I'M blocked for sockpuppetry yet he has nothing done. This is ridiculous, please do something about this, block his IP or something. 134.153.184.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
152eed971183800d | In addition, I see no sock puppet, jackass. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1532401ce46e6b02 | "{| class=""messagebox"" style=""background: AntiqueWhite;""
|-
|This talk page is automatically archived by . Any sections older than (20) days are automatically archived to User_talk:UNFanatic/Archive_3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
|-
|}
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1535002f60a81c34 | Calling me a racist because I disagree with you on deflation is not cool. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15353463c3096b31 | "
Which I never claimed that I did. At least you acknowledge that Kubo exists (Pray) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1537ffcb4befa499 | leave wikipedia you are stupid | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
15382a2dc0c1326c | "
[[™]]whoever is the next person to write on this page has admitted to having aids and fellates aids monkeys non-stop. you can't edit my page. this is my user page and amounts to hypocrisy. the winner is user:Tbhotch, followed by user:Makecat so they have aids in China! Grats!! Now the black supremacist User:Malik Shabazz wants to get in on it. Well, monkeys and all" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1539573a76d3fc98 | Get rid of editors who are runing this site, and you wouldn't get comments like that from me. Did Jimbo Wales have this kind of thing in mind when he made this site? I am only trying to improve the project, now please stay off my talk page boy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153a3d94c22dd890 | byebye
Bye bye, TT. Good to see that you'll not be returning and that RickK's assessment of the situation might be every so slightly less wrong. 134.241.58.253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153ab0eb126bd3c3 | I agree, we need to follow WP:DUE. I don't mind if there's a small section, but there's about a million versions of Dispensationalism, we don't need to list everyone. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1542fb4abf023a7e | "
:Image:Sac.gif
Image deletion warning Image:Sac.gif has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1546088078380661 | "
Glad to be of help. Are you planning on using the info in the Pegasus article, or should I bother to add it myself, as it's obviously *not* ""fancruft""? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154654799ad4e07b | I feel honoured that you took time out of your busy cocksucking schedule to leave this little message for me. Not that I'm going to listen to a guy who likes taking it up the ass dry. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1547e6eee0e9b8d3 | Limbaugh bears a strong physical resemblance to notorious Illinois serial killer John Wayne Gacy Jr. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154a1c2e5ae28fde | "
Just a cc regarding the Blagojevich ITN
Copied from my talk page, no response required
Hey folks, since there's two users in this talk I'll just thread this here. I promoted it to ITN on the reasoning that the removal of a state executive is, IMO, notable whether the subject himself is or not (though I'd figure it is inherent). Seemed obvious to me that this was more than Wikinews, which is why I skipped the discussion phase.
As to the portal, thanks for letting me know, I was not aware of the duplication being needed in the editing, I thought it was transcluded. Learn something new every day ;)
And lastly, I still think that it should be on the main page. While I can understand Spencer's logic in that it needs more information to make it encyclopedic and not just news, I personally don't think that anymore should or could be added to the article on the Blagojevich scandal at the time and it is a pretty descriptive article.
No matter it all, thanks for the input and the learning opportunity from all three. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15521fb39764b9c6 | Femur dimensions estimates, when it comes to extrapolating to phylogenetically and morphologically disparate organisms are inherently inferior to volumetric ones, of course, a volumetric estimate is only as good as the model used and Greg Paul's are inaccurate, this are his skeletals of Stan and Sue, compare them to the ortographic images of the scanned skeletons from Hutchinson et al. study available here and Scott Hartman's skeletals. You find considerable scaling mistakes and conscious choices at articulated the bones that betray Paul's biases to making them as skinny as possible, like the scapular blade being too high in the torso or the concave gastralia that Hutchinson et al. already mentioned as inaccurate in their comments. Using a more accurate reconstruction and following a similar method to Greg Paul, Scott Hartman has estimated the mass of Sue at 8.4 metric tonnes. Now, for the article, since there's no paper that explicitly calls out the 6 tonne estimates as improbably light for the largest individuals I don't feel like we can outright replace it, maybe put up a range? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
155a76e017f37e5a | Please see question on my talk page
Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
155f65ed3b475ac8 | "
Mediation request question
There is an ongoing battle with Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1561728a3c5ac55c | I don't know who you are. This article contains personal informations and defamatory claims related to a living person. Please, do not create similar pages, this is an encyclopedia. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1562b35c0eee123a | "
shouldn't this be titled ""Fritz Kuhn"" instead of ""Fritz Kuhn (Nazi)""
shouldn't this be titled ""Fritz Kuhn"" instead of ""Fritz Kuhn (Nazi)""?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1562c69bf640c4f7 | Yeah, well, the whole internet (I will not disclose my reliable source until tomorrow since you probably won't even read this) supports my claim and disprove the 's speculation. Actually my intentions were good, you asserted something else... I hope everyone is happy now, especially the kid. I couldn't care less, though. See you tomorrow. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
156a66acf5a511e9 | Winning?
is he winning or bi-winning?94.168.210.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15744f54d340b3f4 | Thanks. I fixed the citation issues you mentioned. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
157c4422f3b09710 | "
Making the majority into the minority
""Though there has not been a claim of responsibility, previous bombings in Lahore have been blamed on the Pakistani Taliban because of their disagreement with minority interpretations of Islam, such as Sufism.[5]""
I would like to know when the Barelvis became a minority in Pakistan. It is the largest sect in Pakistan. Even the outdated CIA fact book can verify this. It seems that alJazera does not know what they are talking about. If anyone have a doubt about the connection between Barelvis and sufis, then simply read an article about Barelvis(which is insufficient and at parts incorrect - like many other articles here). They are sufis or they have a sufi master to whom they belong(speaking on the individual level). Personally I can tell you that for a Barelvi, sufis are considered our elderly; our wise sages who we seek for enlightenment and religious knowledge. Barelvi == Sufi more or less(to simplify things for the reader). People need to stop selling their propaganda and belittling the sufis. Barelvis usually call themselves ahle sunnah wal'jamat(this would be the international representative name barelvis refer themselves as - unlike in Pakistan and India due to complexities arising due to impostors). This is the largest sect in the Islamic world(no quotation - simply based on experience and personal research); where sufis are considered as mentioned, our elderly, our sages, our spiritual guides. Hence sufi's are not some sect, but simply our respectable elderly. The sect is called Ahle Sunnah wal'Jamat. An ok translation would be ""The people of the Sunnah"". Unlike Christianity, the right to claim of the true sect is of utmost importance for muslims due to Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w mentioning of the divide among us and that only one sect would be the truly guided one - which shall happen to be the largest one(from the hadith). Again seek out the source if you are interested. Its in the major Hadith collections. Hence quantity is an important question when it comes to pinpointing any discrepancy in this regard. Strictly speaking from an encyclopedic perspective, how can it be considered acceptable to disregard quantity ? If anyone doubts that most Pakistanis are sufis/barelvis/ahle sunnat wal'jamat. Then simply take a look at Sindh. I don't have the exact number, but its like 90-95 % sufis. Its only in NWFP that the majority are Wahabis. But that corresponds to ca. less than 10%(there are shia as well in NWFP and some other sects) of the total population in Pakistan(census 2010). How difficult is it for people to at least conduct their own research and try to separate truth from fallacy ?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15833a035306e378 | "
Fair use rationale for Image:Stolen_logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stolen_logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tex " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1586d88c94bd4114 | " May 2006 (UTC)
Full quotes: ""Most of Jefferson's slaves were sold after his death to pay his many debts. (Finkelman is cited as reference)"" And then later, a direct quote: ""During his life, and in his will Jefferson freed a total of eight slaves, all of them members of the Hemings family. These slaves were the children and grandchildren of Jefferson's father-in-law, John Wayles, and thus related to Jefferson through marriage. Jefferson made no effort to change the status of the three to four hundred other slaves he owned during the fifty years between the signing of Declaration and his death, on July 4, 1826.""
My summary: ""Most of Jefferson's slaves were sold after his death to pay his many debts. During his lifetime, and in his will, Jefferson had freed only eight of his slaves (all of them members of the Hemings family) (cite Finkelman)"" (Talk) 00:13, 31" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
158b6bab6703d015 | "
Definitely merge
Honestly, they're basically the same article with a slightly different name. If you were to just add ""Stock Characters"" as a subsection which is only for movies, you'd have no more trouble. What's taking so much discussion about it are we in Congress, or something?!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
158b869dbfdafe60 | Don't post on my profile page, you fucking cunt. (Talk) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
158c4c9f2cd8ef8c | "
I do not see how it is relevant if sources use the word famous. We are never obliged to use the same words as any source. You can find a source claiming that almost anything is famous - it's hardly a rare case where lots of sources do so - so should we describe everything as famous? No, I tried that and it was rightly shot down. You can find a source - a famous one! - which says that this opera is a shabby little shocker. And those words aren't even listed as ones to avoid, so do we use them as if they are objectively true? Obviously not.
I don't believe the word is forbidden on Wikipedia, I already said that. But we have a guideline called ""words to avoid"". It doesn't say ""avoid these words, unless you really want to use them"", it doesn't say ""avoid these words unless you see them in external sources"", it says ""avoid these words, because they neither impart nor summarise verifiable information"". The guideline is very long established, and I see no sensible case for an exception here. 200.83.101.199 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
158f9fb872dda5a9 | I called Antaeus Feldspar a stalker because he hunted down ALL edits I made in a period and removed them without even bothering to read them, and falsely claimed I inserted unsourced material. That is stalking behavior. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15917dc48fc1a811 | "
Block
2006-06-30 19:40 InShaneee: ""m (Protected User talk:Tobias Conradi: removal of warnings while blocked [edit=sysop:move=sysop])""
2006-07-03 13:24 Ezhiki: ""unprotectedit's been long enough. User should be able to challenge his block, too. If anon IPs are at it again, I'll re-protect this talk page.""
What have anons to do with the protection? BTW, there never where any at this page. . (Talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
159242b3dd46ceec | "
That's trivial, for you are not blocked from those sites. As you knew, I meant the English wikipedia. It's a perfectly straightforward question, and your refusal to answer it with a simple ""yes"" or ""no"" suggests to me that Ann is probably right. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
159972899a282c88 | yup, there it is in the paragraph third from the bottom .. well, there goes my credibility.... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15a013e80e77a7df | It is not superflous that he was under attack by Forest four days before issueing GO11, nor the fact he was attacked by Van Dorn three days after GO11. Also not superflous that he had commenced the Vicksburg Campaign on November 2 1864. The article currently reads as if Grant was a peacetime General when he was actually being attacked by two Confederate Armies. The reader deserves better. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15af8cf0f6531399 | He is right, of course, but then we would have to include most of Bach cantata into most Bach cantatas, and explain in every of Haydn's more than 100 symphonies what a symphony is, - no, there are limits. I followed the source which found it worthwhile to mention in one sentence that this particular work was revived early, while the whole context is explained in an introduction of 72 pages. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15b7ae9e47b02033 | "
I want an unblock and a RFC. I will not tolerate tag-team harrasmment by the same small RW group who just drove Seven Of Diamond off Wiki, and harras and drive out any leftist with organized team tactics. Dheyward Wikistalked me. Here is what I last wrote but couldn't post on ANI
Neither of you talk to the troll edit Dheyward made, then when I asked to talk to him about it, he deleted my question on his talk page as 'trolling'. His edit was 100% POINT and trolling and hurt the article, not helped it. He knew the correct info, but would have rather made a POINT troll edit instead! That is WP abuse and an attempe to bait me. Δbutler• " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15b9a13675ce7733 | "
It wasn't an omission: I'd completed only about half of a huge load this week. It reminds me, that article topic is the next query ... email coming. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15be2045a73859f5 | You're a motherfucking prick!
So, you don't agree with my comments on alcohol, huh? Well, I don't know where you live (if I did, you'd be dead by now), but you fail at life for supporting alcohol. Go kill yourself, you asshole! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
15c66ab4925c409f | ". As Q Chris said, ""...9 is clearly marked as a premise and so does not follow any other,"" therefore, one cannot use 9 to disprove 1, 2, or 3, since they have no logical inter-dependence. The fact that premise 9 creates a contradiction only proves that the argument, assuming premise 9, is invalid. It would be perfectly valid, though incomplete, assuming only 1, 2, 3. Again, Reductio ad Absurdum arguments show that ""not all premises can be true,"" not that ""all premises are not true""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15c83a40333cc2f0 | "
I have restored the three ""See also"" references.
Are the two thesis references readily available to readers in the U.S. and U.K.? Are there web links? If not, would it be feasible to put the thesis references online somewhere, and then link to them?
Something that I am not clear about is whether a grey box model must always also be a statistical model. The first paragraph from Statistical model#General remarks is relevant here, and is copied below.
A statistical model is a special type of mathematical model. What distinguishes a statistical model from other mathematical models is that a statistical model is non-deterministic. Thus, in a statistical model specified via mathematical equations, some of the variables do not have specific values, but instead have probability distributions; i.e. some of the variables are stochastic.
In the equations of a grey box model, is it required that there be stochastic variables? I think that the article would benefit from making that clear.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15d2864ef8e9ca2d | Kudos
Fending off anti-semitism must be exhausting, demoralizing work. I really appreciate your persistence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15d2efb5e489d1de | stop UN-doing, im editing in good faith for this article
seriously there's nothing sinister about my edits, im just correcting the english and just mentioning who wrote what about the repaso. regrettably all the references about the repaso are from peruvian sources...therefore its imperative to point this out in order to protect the integrity of this article. You labelling my edits as vandelism is very obnoxious and makes me think you just want to protect a certain point of view. Since im not disputing the information or making any deletions my edits are justified, if you wish to go further with this be my guest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15d409a260e2c495 | "
Here's perfect example of what to be aiming for. Melodifestivalen, which one could say is similar to Sweden in the Eurovision Song Contest. The Melodifestivalen article is at featured status. That is the prime target to be aiming for. Mᴥuse " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15d9e769aa08e8f2 | Nonsense
The temptation to re-write the bit about steaming mugs of tea was too much, after all the captain was from Massachusetts where they threw all the tea away rather than pay tax on it | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15daeab914e07f4b | I agree. I usually work with more recent films, so I don't find as many critical interpretations of these films. There was a discussion with WikiProject Films recently, though, about including critical interpretations from those involved with film studies or studies of a topic that was in a film. Not all films will have that available, but films like Jaws and Sunset Boulevard almost definitely have them and actually lack them, being FA articles. I hope I can encourage this encyclopedic expansion will try to do that for Fight Club, American Beauty, and Dark City on my side. — (talk • contrib) - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15dbd09b001cbf8a | Who's the stalker? 194.32.31.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15dc420a44461428 | "
You absolutely CANNOT put the silly ridiculous ""Photoshopping"" nonsense on the photo manipulation page. All of that information is already on Photoshop contest and so it doesn't need to waste space in an article on a more general topic. That article already does (or did, with all the edits flying aaround I can't guarantee it's still there) link to Photoshop contest so there's no reason to duplicate it again. Furthermore you absolutely CANNOT continue to try to push ""Photoshopping"" as some official term that means ""Photoshop contests by little loser kids just playing around"" because it means ""use Adobe Photoshop,"" hence the word. For the love of god, stop your POV-pushing of this ridiculous neologism, follow Wikipedia policies, and accept that the Photoshop contest is exactly the article where all that information belongs. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.