Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
437eedcb03b5d94d
" Speedy deletion of Steven Jones (dentist) A tag has been placed on Steven Jones (dentist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. [[User talk:Pigman|man]] "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4380c33c297bef5e
" I don't think you can make this article on Ayn Rand synonymous with Rand herself as it has moved on. Its not a major school but calling it amateur is I think an opinion not a properly sourced comment. On Rand herself, then any use of 'Philosopher' needs qualification per the ongoing discussion on that page. TALK "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4380da1004064f90
To be quite honest, we were going for a more 90s pop punk approach.
0
0
0
0
0
0
438774b78a2cbc58
Sunset-Take I just prodded this article and also removed a paragraph about it from this article. I haven't seen or found any real references on this, other than the existence of some YouTube videos. Perhaps some real Dylan fans could figure out whether this is real and/or notable? It seems like a bunch of speculation, original research, and possibly self-promotion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
438a08181e6c1f21
ref desk cheers steve
0
0
0
0
0
0
438b1dec5cbe1cdf
Pinkbeast I will report you for vandalism and misinterpretation of sources and manipulation if this contintues
0
0
0
0
0
0
438e69256e644081
B1/B2 Is there a reason you redirected the article on invitation letters to B1/B2 visas? Although it is in regard to that visa type, no where in the redirect page does it address the how to of the letterwhat goes into it, etc. Furthermore, I had the Consular Section of the US Embassy read before I posted it to verify accuracy. The purpose was to help people understand and clarify what they needed to include in such letters and your redirect does them a disservice.
0
0
0
0
0
0
439526b23c71bf54
January 2009 (UTC) An Encyclopedia... not Wikipedia. 20:33, 16
0
0
0
0
0
0
439914c4016d91c4
A picture and more information on the store I think this article would greatly benefit with a shot of the shop, both during filming, and if the shop is substantially different, then one of after filming. I will try to find one of both to include in the article. Thanks. It would certainly look nice in the article. One thing though: New discussions (and new posts within discussions) go at the bottom, not the top. No big deal, though. And welcome to Wikipedia. -)
0
0
0
0
0
0
43992f94d0c1526a
" I don't want you to talk to me. I want you to clean up the mess you made. .Wolfowitz "
0
0
0
0
0
0
439e17dcee6a00ed
" Love this bot I just love this bot. Try as I may to check all my links, this thing always finds one (or more) that I misssed. So many bots seem to just do trivial things that really have little or no impact. This one really does a good job. thanks (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
439efb586994fb56
" The Wikipedia administrator Number 57 libels my edits improving this article as ""vandalism."" This is further proof that %57ikipedia is %63ontrolled by the anti-Semites."
0
0
0
0
0
0
43a4c5702d4f5f7b
User:Scarfaced Charley I don't know if you remember Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Scarfaced Charley from over a year ago – I see he was also blocked as a Sockpuppet. I worked a bit on helping fix some of those. Yesterday I found that Scarfaced Charley had made a duplicate Campaignbox template and therefore some relevant articles were using that Template:Campaignbox Little Rock while others were using the preexisting Template:Campaignbox Advance on Little Rock which follows the WP:MILHIST convention of naming campaignboxes in accordance with the campaigns defined by the American Battlefield Protection Program unit of the National Park Service. That site is currently unavailable because of the Government Shutdown, but can be verified in Google's cache. I merged the content into Template:Campaignbox Advance on Little Rock, updated all the articles to use the correct campaignbox template, blanked the duplicate template and tagged it with db-t3. I had originally also put a redirect to the corrected template, but I couldn't figure out how to make both the redirect and the db-3 tag work... Hopefully I've done it correctly. Does this situation indeed qualify for speedy deletion or does it need to be brought to TfD? Also, there's one talkpage comment at Template talk:Campaignbox Little Rock. What's the proper way to handle that? Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43a691685854396c
You are no fun. I give up. But the edits will still remain there as my proof that I have won the war of truths against Wikipedia. 218.186.13.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
43ad63065d42d97f
It is cute how TheGracefulSlick came over to me in your defense. I guess a lackey will do anything to please their master. It is a shame the user did so because I have seen he has similar interests as you. Looks like you both have made several unnotable articles. Once I read through your pages, I'll turn to his as well. Sorry, as much as this seems impossible to believe, it isn't personal. However, after seeing page after page of irrelevant bands being added to the list of garage rock bands, I couldn't stand it anymore. Oh, by the way, if you slander me by calling me a sockpuppet again, I will report you, and you will be blocked, so choose words carefully if you want to at least comment at deletion pages. Also, if that Slick guy responds at those pages again, I can have you blocked for canvasing. Make sure he gets the memo, you really have a lot to learn about how Wikipedia works. How do you like my new username, I think it is most appropriate. Ta-ta.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43ae6e95d7a78e69
" Okay I checked it. It has a weak fair use rationale, but it might qualify, but it is very borderline. Rationale: will likely not impede commercial revenue; it is used for the critique or discourse about a famous person, it is for educational purposes, and it informs the public. Generally not preferred though. Resolution seems low enough. (Be eudaimonic!) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
43af459be98db116
"Well, fellas, I guess you can add Adventure Time & Friends - now for sale at AMAZON.COM (with street date of March 3, 2015! http://www.amazon.com/Cartoon-Network-Adventure-Time-Friends/dp/B00S91DMF2) - I told you this was an official release... It just so happened to be a Walmart Timed Exclusive (for sale at a single retailer before everyone else gets it). Please note, the ORIGINAL release from 2014, includes the ""Only at Walmart..."" sticker. ~ EK "
0
0
0
0
0
0
43b42cd46291d099
What is it and where is it?
0
0
0
0
0
0
43b6e5c8601c130d
as well as O'Connor's Journal of Biblical Literature Vol. 112, No. 2 statements mentioned above on this talk page,
0
0
0
0
0
0
43d00d1ad34cc4f1
Ok Phoenix of9, now you are arguing with 3 veteran editors of this article who do not approve of your edits,
0
0
0
0
0
0
43d96a8c3544b331
/* request for help */ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/D-panama This persons contributions to Richard Fifer are still seen in google because of the < arrow that is linked D-Links words Convicted Narcotics Dealer to the page which then creates the headings on google. This is not cache, wikipedia is doing exactly what this person wanted. They added this information and eliminated it right after knowing what the result would be and are using wikipedia for their own purposes. Im not sure if I am explaining myself well enough, but it is quite clear what is happening here and wikipedia has not seen it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43dda45d675e8b3d
The Reality of the Wikipedia It is clear that the worst proclaimed by the opponents of the Wikipedia is true. That it is more interested in appeasing the egos of those in charge than pursuing the concept of dispassionate information. When a female editor is able to suppress the revelation of a complete quote, which refutes her desire that only two words of that same quote were true, because a male editor is too infatuated to reject her perversion of the truth, then the Wikipedia has rejected ANY pretense to being more than what it is, which isn't much. Thus my withdrawal from editing. I have not so much of life left that I can waste it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43e5affca61d9a0a
See reply on Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Greece/Politics and politicians task force.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43e63bf604084bfd
Ok, I got it that not all gay mean speak this way But is it really necessary to have 50% of the article stating that this is a stereotype and that some (BUT NOT ALL!) homosexuals speak this way?
0
0
0
0
0
0
43e781027f425e1f
" ""Considered the greatest mathematician of the 18th century..."" What about Euler? It has to be a close call anyway. And who is doing this considering?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
43ef5fbb02be273a
image made ya look....... big smile -) beckjord
0
0
0
0
0
0
43f61f4563671b71
don't delete my response. i appologized to you and you delete it? and from a fellow wikipedian. shame.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43f655118c8c2395
Your welcome You deserve to have a lot of barnstars for your amazing work here. You should be thenking yourself for it and not me. Have a nice week and god bless.
0
0
0
0
0
0
43fa46ee2ecc593d
Lefties This is for anybody I'm hoping to take up violin and I am a leftie. I'd like to know some thoughts on what a violin letie should do. Zeke
0
0
0
0
0
0
43fe869776e7df05
Racists They are nothing but racist little boys with little white dicks who want to suck Adolf Shitler, surely they deserve a less than welcoming page? I didnt know wikipedia supported NAZISM!!!124.180.159.192
1
0
1
0
1
1
44034df9773a4b00
", 12 September 2014 (UTC) The article says "" Süddeutsche Zeitung stated the group ignored other evidence"", the clarification needed is what is the other evidence Süddeutsche Zeitung referring too? 21:31"
0
0
0
0
0
0
440ec0e3c18d4171
Indeed scientists do think the plant evolved / developed in the cooler highlands of Africa as I have noted, but let us be more diplomatic my friend, since as you should know we will also be judged by our choice of presentation. /talk/
0
0
0
0
0
0
440f8a6086125b45
Completely rearranged and rewritten from scratch by diamone== Thanksgiving Week 2012. paragraphs inserted where appropriate. Several sections, including Summer of Love London clarified and expanded. Unrelated sections split apart from one another and new sections created. Other sections from other related Wikipedia articles incorporated where necessary. No it does not read like the script to a PBS documentary. ==
0
0
0
0
0
0
44126d7431a04f6a
My edits Got your message, but I do not quite get what you are refering to. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44160579646b9c22
over those who may not have gained it yet
0
0
0
0
0
0
44196fe57e9f385f
Holy apostrophe and semicolon misuse, Batman! I corrected a few errors, I'm sure there are more. Not sure whether to capitalize the quotes from the protester signs. 35.9.6.175 Emily
0
0
0
0
0
0
441c79fd9a99b9f2
" Notability of Dieagram A tag has been placed on Dieagram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-•MyEars•MyMouth-timed "
0
0
0
0
0
0
441cf13285076a33
Johnny Marr He was in the members section, when he only worked in the studio with them for a week (unless there is something i missed, but i don't think so) 80.195.80.148
0
0
0
0
0
0
441d01a0626511ee
I think your making a gross exgageration. Do you think the Ian Brady article should mention his current location. The point of the article is to describe Ashworth and whilst Brady is not typical having a reference to him aides that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
441d4f04e4e5614d
How dare you call my edits nonsense. I'll see you pay for that...
0
0
0
0
0
0
441f237b37935504
Thanks for the tip ... it was just a copy/paste from the address bar though - so I got the URL-Encoding for free )
0
0
0
0
0
0
44207e13a6c5d121
Nikki311 and I already resolved this issue. I appreciate her work and have apologized for any inconveniences it caused.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4428e787aee87fdb
I'M TAKING YOU ALL YOU DOWN!!!
1
0
0
0
0
0
4429ae338db4c801
, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Right, I agree that it has received a lot of coverage that deserves some kind of mention in the article. I would just avoid using specific numbers/percentages from the poll, mainly because those numbers aren't fixed and can change at any time, but also because they haven't been sufficiently analyzed. 12:19
0
0
0
0
0
0
4429bee62209dcfb
BAN ME! ALL EDITS REPORTED TO FBI!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
442f1ba197318ffd
Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Polandball Hi there, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Polandball. 213.243.174.104
0
0
0
0
0
0
442f58d04808a54c
Moviemaker92 11:50 EST 3/23/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
443c0350f8ada3e5
i lost my password, how do i set a new one?
0
0
0
0
0
0
443d034c674ea2fc
fire department alert We're having trouble tonight with a vandal, see Wikipedia:Block log. Some suspect it is the same user as 08:13, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4444de54597000da
Dimitri & Nina Well, thank you so much for your reply. I hoped you would! About six months ago I noticed how badly ballroom dancing in general was being treated on WP, and decided to do something about it. I had been taught dancing by someone who had taken tuition in the latin dances from Pierre & Lavelle, so I knew their names from being a teenager in the 1950s. I wish now I had taken the trouble to meet them, but I didn't. Since I'm something of an expert on Cuban music I decided to start with the group of dancers who started LA dancing in England, from where it has spread all over the world. I soon discovered the lack of reliable reference sources was the main problem. I kept seeing references to Pierre, but it was ages before I had enough to put up the page on WP. I still don't have enough for Lavelle. With difficult cases I start a Word file offline. Anything on WP gets copied by bots and plagiarised widely. Even these personal pages. I've got copies of all the books written about LA dances at that time, including both Dimitri's books and Pierre's book. I don't know where you are, of course, but if you are somewhere in England, we might arrange to meet, and you could have a look at the books. It sounds as though you don't have a copy of his first book. I've tried to interview all the survivors from that time. So far, I've only found two. I'd certainly like to meet your father if he was willing. He's bound to have lots of things tucked away at the back of his mind which might help us. And I'll answer more fully about myself, but not on WP (for reason given above) Now I'm going to let you have my e-mail address. If you wish, you could send me an e-mail, which would automatically give me yours. Then, once you know your e-mail has worked, please wipe off my e-address from this page after you've stored it, preferably on a private machine rather than one available for general use (open machines without good security get scanned regularly). Here goes: [email protected] Regards,
0
0
0
0
0
0
4448ac9a81605376
2013 (UTC) I agree, the complete lack of mention of Tumblr on the page, aside from footer, is really odd. 19:13, 11 June
0
0
0
0
0
0
444a51f330c7e48e
The references you provided does not substantiate. Here is a newer report which shows sri lanka armed forces good ethical conduct during operation to degrade the combat effectiveness of the Tamil tigers. http://www.defence.lk/news/20110801_Conf.pdf
0
0
0
0
0
0
444b999c44aa9ba4
You must be a complete moron. You have no authority to warn people. I just warned you, too. Big Whoop. Stop bugging people and get a life.
0
0
0
0
1
0
445268c1b685da2a
other people's Gosh you can't even speak English which you claim to be your mother tongue. Puh-lease.
1
0
0
0
0
0
4452903a316e24db
OK you've convinced me. Doright, do you have a response? -
0
0
0
0
0
0
4454d90d48c60c2a
Sentry Gun Page in reference to your insertion. the site is The Sentry Project. you are not allowed to put that site on the sentry gun page though. even if you thought it was relevant you still can't.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44588727f590ca7e
" OK, I'll grant to both of you that, in a perfect world, the interest factor is as important as everything else I've outlined ... but we are so far from a perfect world at DYK and there is so much that needs attention ! DYK has the opportunity to train editors early on and get articles off on the right foot ... instead, procedures and practices (there and at WIKICUP) encourage the churning out of deficient articles to gain perceived prizes. And what happens to the ""interest factor"" is the same as what happens to prose and sourcing ... editors learn, indeed are encouraged by reviewers, to pad up their articles so that expansion/length is met, and there is often no regard for whether that padding is a) based on reliable sources, b) relevant to the article, or c) well written. A similar thing happens when we demand interesting hooks ... that quickly becomes scandalously ridiculous tabloid style hooks, often with BLP issues or MEDRS issues of plain faulty hooks because non-reliable sources are used. We have admins whose own DYK hooks are inaccurate, and are passed, based on blog sources. Recently. SO ... yes, interesting hooks might be one part of training new and experienced editors and encouraging responsible and policy-compliant editing, but there's a huge iceberg under that tip at DYK that is not being addressed because the few qualified reviewers who are active there cannot keep up with the volume, and we have several entrenched DYK regulars who either don't care about copyvio and reliable sources or simply and still after many years of editing do not even understand core policies. There is a need to address the whole picture not just ""lame hooks"" and the whole picture cannot be corrected unless you work with the few clueful regulars there to deal with the several who lack clue, impose their will, and routinely place deficient articles on the mainpage. DYK will never be eliminated (it probably should be because it is responsible for so much truly bad content that will never be cleaned up), so can we at least work to improve reviewing there ? A slowdown in volume would help, along with an elimination of QPQ so that knowledgeable reviewers can assure our mainpage is being used responsibly. But part of that is dealing with the experienced ""leaders"" at DYK who don't know and won't enforce policy and good editing practice ... work with the few who do. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4459bdf71635b1c3
LOL PENIS! LOL! I AM TALKING TO YOU SO THIS SHIT IS NOT VANDALISING!
0
0
0
0
0
0
445bea61a33c53ee
"I WILL BE STRICKING UNTIL A CLEAR POLICY THAT DISTINGUISHES LIVING RELIGIONS FROM ""MYTHOLOGY"" IS ADDRESSED"
0
0
0
0
0
0
4465d6d43bd5c715
J.O.N.A.S episodes Sounds fine to me it's not a very good article anyway, there's not enough information.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4466b0dd1362fe37
":: Really, we should get back to the discussion regarding chronological order before you dig yourself any deeper. Regarding ""some specific circumstance when the nation that actively ought against the major Ally can be considered not as a Nazi co-belligerent,"" when the USSR invaded and brutally subjugated the Baltics it was not an Ally. That it was an Ally later is completely irrelevant to the situation in the Baltics and any other territories where the USSR was the initial aggressor, and you know that. (I also point out that you use later, not original, relationships to tar others but use the same to your benefit when it's good for Stalin.) If you wish to demonstrate some semblance of objectivity, I suggest you: retract your contentions of ""semi-voluntary"" cooperation by the Baltic peoples with Nazis based on gratitude that Hitler considered them ""semi-Aryan"" and not semi-Simian affirm that as far as you are concerned, the only reason Latvians et al. fought against an ""Ally"" is because that ""Ally"" was re-invading their homeland, and that fighting that ""Ally"" had nothing to do whatsoever with the expression of sympathies for the Nazi cause. Absent of these two actions on your part, I cannot consider your presence here and participation in this conversation in particular as being in anything resembling good faith. Regarding Poland, let's see, 51% of territory to Stalin, 49% of territory to Hitler = Stalin wound up with more of Poland than Hitler. So, your personal attack that I'm lying is, unfortunately, a lie. As for your contention that Stalin ""saved"" Jews, with respect to the Baltics at least, Jews were deported to Siberia by the USSR in a greater proportion of population than any other ethnic group and to harsher conditions, as Stalin was a rabid anti-Semite. Your history is flawed there as well. That some Jews escaped owing to circumstance had nothing to do with Stalin being beneficent to Jews, he plainly was not. ►TALK "
0
0
0
0
0
0
446801ab2aeb9a63
", I concur with White Guard that Lenin and his government committed many atrocities against the Russian people, and your attempt to 'whitewash' their reputation is somewhat historically inaccurate (please don't take this as a personal attack). As for the kulaks, you're perfectly correct that they never really existed as a class, and were invented by the Communists as an attempt to encourage 'class warfare' in the countryside - yet you choose to ignore the fact that it was Lenin, not Stalin, who began the campaign against the kulaks. It was, admittedly, Stalin who was responsible for the wholesale purging of kulaks as part of his collectivisation programme. Overall, I would say Stalin took Lenin's ideology to new heights of paranoia and mass murder - but the foundations of this ideology were all in the system that Lenin established. Stalin was worse than Lenin, but there wasn't a clean historical break between the two - they were part of the same authoritarian and brutal Communist tradition. What Is To be Done?-Part III Further remarks are obviously required. ANTI-SEMITISM. Could I please have a reference for Nicholas' authorisation of the Kishinev massacre? As far as I am aware this episode was the handiwork of Vyacheslav Plehve, minister of the interior and a notorious anti-semite. The pogrom was condemned by the governor of Bessarabia and by the central government. Sergius Witte, by far the Tsar's best minister, made his own feelings on the matter plain. There were pogroms in Tsarist Russia, and anti-semitism was a long-established and poisonous tradition. The point is that this cannot always be traced back to the Tsar: Russian state and government was far too complex for that. Official anti-semitism was, moreover, of a confessional rather than a biological nature. Under Alexander III the drive for assimiliation became ever greater, after the murder of his liberal-minded father, but it also affected Catholics, Lutherans and Muslims, as well as Jews. Civil disabilities could always be lifted for converts to Orthodoxy, for those who were minded to take this path. Nicholas was a conventional and unimaginitive man, but even he could detect the patently false. Although he was initially taken in by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (as was the London Times in 1919) he soon recognised them, according to Vladimir Burtsev, no friend of the Tsar, as dangerous political nonsense. You may care to consult Solomon Grayzel, again no admirer of Tsarist Russia, who in his A History of the Jews says ""Even the Tsar had considered the forgery utterly improbable and unworthy of consideration."" (Philadelphia, 1968, p. 613). Now, this whole debate arose because I questioned Lenin's credentials as a campaigner against anti-semitism on the basis of a single speech with no examples provided. If we look at the actual record of Soviet Russia under Lenin a quite different picture emerges. The age-old antisemitism of the Tsars showed little sign of going away; if anything, it got worse. Red army units were amongst those responsible for pogroms in the Ukraine, to the obvious disquiet of Trotsky. During the 1921 campaign against religion, specifically authorised by Lenin, the Jews were singled out as a special target; even Maxim Gorky accused the government of using anti-semitism for political purposes. There were pogroms in Smolensk and other places. When Jewish people tried to defend their synagogues, threatened with confiscation, troops broke in, shouting 'Death to the Yids' in the process. The campaign of 1921 peaked in the mock trial of 'Judaism', carried out, for additionl emphasis, if any such was needed, in the very same courtroom as the Beiliss trial of 1913. What price Lenin's support for the Jews? TERROR. Yes, there was terror, extensive and brutal; but that of the Whites was more than matched by that of the Reds, and not just against counter-revolutionaries but peope who had been their allies and comrades in the political underground. By 1921, well after the White threat had gone away, oppression and terror had become a fact of life in the 'worker's fatherland'. It never went away. Let me make it plain that I am simpy asking that this article reflects the true facts of Lenin's career. As it stands at present it is little more than a biased 'appreciation.' I see you've been doing your homework 'White Guard'...We are evidentally getting a more intellectual class of red-baiter these days...I therefore pledge myself - on behalf of the 'Guardians of the Lenin-Shrine', at whatever expense in time and money, - to read the chapter 'The Pogroms and White Ideology in the Russian Civil War' by P. Kenez in
0
0
0
0
0
0
446c865c545a8d82
" Political issues - NPOV Hi, Mrstevier, having removed the following: ""Consequently, there is a strong will within Purley to leave the borough and return to independent district status which would mean planning decisions (the most controversial issue) would be made by local citizens. The sale and conversion of the Purley town hall (pictured) which might have quashed such ambition has instead increased the resolve of many local residents to secede from the London Borough of Croydon"", are you sure this was POV? I think you were pretty high-handed removing this part of the para. Please give reason why you think it was POV. Have you looked into this, or is this a notion you dislike personally, thus including your own POV reasons for removing that part of the article? Or is it the word secede that bothers you? That can always be replaced by another word. You need to give a reason, Mrs. I, for one would be grateful. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
446f2633b2086980
Great! Fingers crossed ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
44706bda980fb641
So try to discuss the edits before you make them, and give time for response instead of reverting immediately.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4470e3a550a9b4b0
" It appears that the case has settled down and there is no longer a need for my services; is that correct?DPetersontalk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
448af3be3cec0dea
Image Trying to get image in infobox. Server may be down.
0
0
0
0
0
0
448d13a38b84dc8c
" In response to your feedback Even if i takes time: try to read everything posted on your and the article's talk-page (especially follow the bluelinks provided), and try to understand what we are saying to you; as to our aim: Wikipedia is an ancyclopedia. Perhaps there is a slight misunderstanding on your part as to what it is for; it was pointed out to you already that under our rules there is a very strong possibility that the article will not survive the deletion debate, but this is not done out of spite, but simply in accordance with said rules. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4495258e706b06f7
I'm concerned that the page author (a fairly new editor) may not have realised the consequences of blanking the page, and that it may have been a panicked response to the earlier speedy deletion tag. I've asked for clarification on his talkpage.  雲水
0
0
0
0
0
0
44969d014e7f2f5a
I'm Sorry I wish to apologize for harassing you. I've thought about it, and decided that my behavior is / was both unjustified, obnoxious, and uncalled for. I'm sure you think this is just more bullshit, but I really do want to walk away from this nonsense that *indeed* I created. You have my word - for what it is worth - that I will not engage in this type id bad behavior in the future. There is no excuse, but none the less, I feel I owe you an apology - which you are under no obligation to accept and I would expect you not to. I will not vandalize your Talk page again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4497391c524b8206
Created bare bones outline. Will flesh out later as time permits
0
0
0
0
0
0
449740edde93c7a8
regarding your recent vandalism Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Prescott Bush, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
449ba98ee1bab989
" A reliable source for what? I have never suggested adding or including any unsourced content in this article. ""Case of the missing source"" solved. ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
449ff53a803e1226
" Simon's reversions I removed a separate section titled Opposing Views containing an external link itself titled ""Refuting Mormonism"" that does not purport to be about the article Book of Mormon. I also removed a line from the ""major doctrinal teachings"" subsection which claims that certain verses state ""Jesus' death was not sufficient to cleanse men of all sins"". Upon reading the verses cited I found that they do not, in fact, make that claim. Gabriel Simon reverted those edits without comment, and in the process deleted another contribution which rephrased a line for better reading. Since he made no edit summary I have no way of knowing why he has done this. I placed a request on his usertalk for him to explain his edits, and I will now redo the edits I did earlier. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
44a10ae87c1ae858
Re:the order which it should be listed - it has been tried to be listed first by somebody else but this was already removed. This is his largest claim to notoriety and therefore should be listed first.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44ac8bfd503d61d1
" Use of Navigational templates The navigational templates links a ""series of articles"" that are linked to each other by presenting ""links"". The article in question is not part of links of the template in question. The article also contains two navigational templates which ""conceptually"" and ""physically (in the form of link)"" links the article in question to other articles. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
44b8869786522985
you don't stalk me god damnt
1
0
0
0
0
0
44bb7fb3924e3f17
Ima gona slash your tires!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the fuck is your problem you little schoolyard picnic bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!! THis is the motha fuckin guy that did the gears of war thing motha fucka. So ima get mah niggas all up in yo grill motha fucka.... Is this really how u fucking treat your motha fuckin wikipedians BITCH. IM fuck YO tires up motha FUCKA i live in the motha fuckin GANGSTA STREETS IN MOTHA FUCKIN LA MOTHA FUCKA I JUST GOT THIS MOTHA FUCKIN COMPUTER AND NOW IM GONNA BREAKIN IT OFF YOUR FUCKING EGG SHAPED HEAD BITCH!
1
1
1
0
1
0
44bd2927df9be99a
If this was on Francis' page, it surely would be wiped out. Oh well...
0
0
0
0
0
0
44c6994f7c17b6b4
" FYI - Clarkxwayne recently created Uckg universal church of the kingdom of god, a copy of this version. I left a note on their talk page that this is not the way to solve any issues they may have with this article. whisper in my ear "
0
0
0
0
0
0
44c8a8afcd44efe9
What? Why? Because a troll asked you to? I HAVE NEVER VANDALISED WIKIPEDIEA, AND NEVER WILL. IF YOU WANT TO TRY RTO DO SOMETHING USEFUL WHY NOT BAN TROLLS LIKE QWORTY, or TreasuryTag? .
1
0
0
0
0
0
44d25ec046564b75
Hi Added extra notes on history and local buildings including Photo's. These are all referenced, including documents with regard to the three murders.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44d38bb4222f5b21
List of heads of state of Libya tells that Khaddafi and his head of state quit their positions on 22 August 2011. That's not right, is it? As far as I've understood, those two guys just lost most of their remaining power but not their formal titles. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
44d4e81d5047fa5c
" OK Pedro, go for it. No great rush, just whenever you're ready. I don't edit from work but will transclude when I'm on from home. Have looked at the process and seems straightforward enough. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
44d4eb6d50ded828
The page looks good. Thank you. BV P.S. How do I sign my name with a date time stamp as is required, after I make an addition? Is that a command to do this?
0
0
0
0
0
0
44d8c4f503ab06f2
Fröttmaning is just a district in Munich. It has no article and probably never will. (, Don't create it just to make a point.) So, I will delete it once again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44d93e8e4ec83aad
God, given that I have been accused of having an account 'The_Maiden_City' which I believe is currently blocked I don't see how my accusers have made comparisons in contributions and times?It is a bit tedious to troll through dozens of discussions to find contributions and timings but where do I post my findings?
0
0
0
0
0
0
44daf7b36150758b
I've given a full source; Carey was the critic. What other portions of the article require rewriting? (I've become pretty lousy at this.) — | talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
44e3007f9986b9b0
Hence my question. Your edit was no better, and was clearly upon POV lines. I'm asking if anyone knows where that statement came from so it can be properly sourced or altered/deleted, if need be. That's how we do things around here. Once again, do not make edits without discussing them first, or at the very least providing sources to justify your edit. On a page as contentious as this, you should generally not make any edits without first reaching something approximating consensus (no, that doesn't mean you and BrittishWatcher) on the talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
44ea13bd5478e02a
" ""Bottom line here, and this is likely not your fault"" is addressed to whom? So tell me what those intentions were? Don't you see everyone is jumping the gun? My assumption was that content disputes don't give a anti-homeopathy editor rights over a pro-homeopathy editor. Since the probation warning yesterday I have not touched the Deadly Nightshade article. However an anti-homeopathy editor has reverted twice in the span of a few hours without any consensus. He has ignored editors on the talk page that are trying to work towards an agreement. Before yesterday I would have reverted his edit at least once. But due to the warning I avoided the article page and focus my attention on the talk page. Instead of touching the talk page, I brought the issue to AN/I. What have I done wrong? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
44efaeebf8378523
Deletion request on Commons The deletion of Image:The Gates - Around Bend.jpg was asked some time ago on Commons for copyright reasons. If this picture is deleted, the whole Commons:Category:The Gates is threatened as well. This debate has not attracted many comments on Commons. As a Commons sysop, I'm in favour of the deletion, but I'd like to get more input.  (Λέγετε)
0
0
0
0
0
0
44f277a396d0bba7
Some ratings from the VCHip 1. The Power: TV-PG-L (hell, shit, pissed) 2. Just Set Up the Chairs: TV-PG-V (the Destroyer of World murders) 3. Caffeinated Concert Tickets: TV-PG-D (lady pecs = boobs, real reason people go to concerts is too see hot girls) 4. Death Punchies: TV-PG-V: (death kwon do, Rigby's bare ass) 5. Free Cake: TV-PG-L: (pissed) 6. Meat Your Maker: TV-PG-L-V (pissed, cannibalistic hot dogs) 7. Grilled Cheese Deluxe: TV-PG (purple nurple, suggestive touching) 8. The Unicorns Got to Go: TV-PG-D-V (lady flashbacks, risque goth lady, eating crotch balls, attack of the unicorns) 9. Prank Callers: TV-PG (brain tumor) 10. Don: TV-PG-D (Don reveals all the characters are naked, sugar seems gay) 11. Rigby's Body: TV-PG-L (sucks, turds) 12. Mordecai and the Rigbys: TV-PG (crotch humps) 13. Ello Govnor: TV-PG-V (evil taxi) 14. It's Time: TV-PG-D (Rigby tongue-kissing Margaret, discussing how good movies have sex) 15. Appreciation Day: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 16. Peeps: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 17. Dizzy: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 18. My Mom: TV-PG-D (my mom jokes imply sex) 19. High Score: TV-PG (GBF kicked in the crotch) 20. Rage Against the TV: TV-PG-V (kick him in the junk, Hammer's killings) 21. Party Pete: TV-14-D (guests with breasts line, breast zoom-ins, sexual dancing with Pops, Pete's groin lump shown) 22. Brain Eraser: TV-14 (naked Pops seen throughout whole episode, implied long penis scene, junk) 23. Benson Be Gone: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 24. But I Have a Receipt: TV-PG-V (the stabbing) 25. This is My Jam: TV-PG (gutters, crotch humps) 26. Muscle Woman: TV-14-D-S (junk, tongue-kiss, big breasted Starla) 27. Temp Check: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 28. Jinx: TV-PG-V (Jinx monsters attack, NSFW remark on dirty raccoon, naked people) 29. See You There: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 30. Do Me a Solid: TV-PG (shake weight) 31. Grave Sights: TV-PG-V (zombies) 32. Really Real Wrestling: TV-PG-V (wrestlers) 33. Over the Top: TV-PG-V (Rigby's death) 34. The Night Owl: TV-PG-D (second base 35. A Bunch of Baby Ducks: TV-PG 36. More Smarter: TV-PG 37. First Day: TV-PG 38. Go Viral: TV-PG (panties) 39. Skunked: TV-PG 40. Karaoke Show: TV-PG 41. Stick Hockey: TV-PG (chinese man named Chong, like ching chong 42. Bet to Be Blonde: TV-PG (blonde stereotypes)
1
0
0
0
0
0
44f7882afa05916e
" you must be Kidman... Me, mediate on this article? Isn't my comment a clear indication of an opinion? Would that not preclude me from mediating on it? Or am I missing the point? Too many questions? demandez "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4500b3e276883a1f
" Rename article, reorganize subcategories, and incorporate Jesus in Islam as a mainstream ""portrait"" The article's title is misleading. It leads us to believe it will be an article on historical (historicity) of Jesus. In fact, it is an article on Historical Portraits of Jesus, and should be named as such. Secondly, the subtitles need to be renamed/reorganized, and some material needs to be shifted into different categories. The entire ""cultural background"" subsection is Christian POV and should be named as such. Historical elements needs to be largely removed, since this article is about portraits, and some of the further subsections of that category are already covered in the Historicity of Jesus article, and are in fact duplicated there. And thirdly, and perhaps most glaringly from a secular POV, this article needs to incorporate Islamic portraits of Jesus (Isa Ibn Maryam عيسى) This portrait needs to be a ""mainstream"" portrait. If this portrait is not included, then the article needs to be renamed Historical Christian portraits of Jesus These recommendations would be a good start in establishing the NPOV of this article "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4500d312bbcef800
Caption wording for article Philosopher Larry Sanger initially conceived of Wikipedia as a feeder project for Nupedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4507c142e2aeafaa
" As I have said repeatedly: I will be very happy to stop corresponding with you, Calamitybrook. You need only stop talking about me. Gaming the system by spewing nastiness about me accross the encyclopedia, while saying ""stay off my talk page"", is rude. Stop. If you want to talk about me, great, we will do it on your talk page. If you want to talk about WP, we can do that in the appropriate articles. Please drop your undue fascination with me from your talk page. Please do not readd it there or on other talk pages. Each time you do, please rest assured I will respond by asking you to stop on your talk page. All the best.- Sinneed "
0
0
0
0
0
0
450e5668505653d6
Horace Mann does have the best Model UN team in the country. You're clearly just jealous because you weren't good enough to attend
0
0
0
0
0
0
4514a109a09c7d49
Please change the first sentence back to reflect the material actually in the reference. 89.100.0.70
0
0
0
0
0
0
45164a29aa8d27a1
Current NFL Players Was thinking maybe we could include a list of current NDSU players in the NFL.
0
0
0
0
0
0
45175bf0b0cbc419
" I have an issue on Commons I have several editors on Commons that apparently do not like me releasing images under a CC-BY-SA license, and are continually editing the permission section of my images claiming that I have lost any and all control of my images wholly, as if they were in public domain. They insist I have no moral rights, that is rights that prevent my work and name being used in any derogatory way against my will, and continually remove such. If you read the license here you will see the license leaves my fair use and moral rights intact. Editors have already brought this to ANI, and nothing came of it. Just the same editors claiming I don't have rights, and noninterested editors trying to tell them the license does indeed protect my moral rights. Could you help me with this situation at all? [tk] "
0
0
0
0
0
0