tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
4518585291f1600c	" Since the topic of the article is Liberalism, I think Obama merits a mention. If you want, you could delete the adjective ""social"". As for your statement that there has been no expansion of the welfare state, I need only mention Bush II's prescription drug plan for seniors and Obama's Affordable Health Care Act. But social liberalism is not the same as welfare liberalism. It includes the end of Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the decriminalization of medical marijuana. The election of a Black president is itself a major victory for social liberalism, in a country where all previous presidents have been White. "	0	0	0	0
451969e805274c2d	Kiefer, if you'd like me to reply to any of these issues here, I will. Otherwise, I'm addressing them on their respective talk pages. Thanks!	0	0	0	0
4519a3e23491086e	" Dear soldier of the Wikipedia neo-nazi/communist dictatorship What the hell are you tlaking about. I did not re-creat any article about the formal Australian Worker's Party formaly known as the New Communist Party of Australia. I think you are high on the lies told by storm front. You the hell listens to storm front. Oh my god Wikipedia is becomeing a dumping ground for neo-nazis and altra lefties. Since I am the voice of reason. I just have to say one thing. Pleas read my reply to storm front. Here it is - Okay okay. Lats just get the fatcs right. This is what some nazi said on storm front "" Peter Watson (of Warwick, Qld.) has claimed to represent all sorts of groups, and - in forums - likes to pretend he is several people at the same time. He has a habit of claiming to be the President of organisations he has made up on the internet. He says he is 14 (or 16) years old."" Answere:- No I have not supported lotsd of groups. I have only supported the CPW , AWP (formally known as the NCPA). I was never a member of the People's Think Tank Association plus the PTTA never had a president. Plus I have only ever been one person. And that person is Peter Watson. This nazi must have a lot of time on his hands to look for information on me. So I can only come up with only one conclusion and that is simply that this man has no social or sex life. So I can only say on thing ""go get a life man and get a women"". Peter was President of the ""People's Think Tank Association"" based in Warwick, which he says ""split from the Communist Party of Australia just recently and they publish the Caller"" Answere:- I was never the president of the PTTA. The PTTA was never ever created. The Caller was a fake news paper. As fare as I know it was only ever printed once by some nazi. Since the PTTA was never realy so how cna it split from the CPA. So many questions and not enough answeres. The man just doesn't have a life. Peter was ""President of the New Communist Party of Australia"" and ""Chairman of the Central Committee"" (this is in his Communist International News) Answere:- I was the president but not the had of the NCPA. I was the chairman of the central commitee. But as you might know the NCPA and the AWP are the same group. The AWP change its name to NCPA but change it's name back soon after remember you stupid nazi. Peter was ""President of the Communist Party of Warwick"" Answere:- Only for a short number of times in the hsitory fot he party that I was the presidnet of it. Peter also says: ""the New Communist Party of Australia (NCPA) , The People Think Tank Association (PTTA) and the Communist Socialist Workers Front (CSWF) did dissolve and absorbed into the Australia First Party (AFP)"". Answere:- The Communist Socialist Worker's Front never ever was created and never was real. It just goes to show that nazis just makes things up to help them selvs. The PTTA was never real. If you are aksing why I made the CSWF and the PTTA up well it was just for fun. Peter has also set up the ""Australian Worker's Party"" Answere:- This nazi (FairDinkum) is a idiot. I have said this many times that it was started in april was a split from the CPW that changed it's name to NCPA than change it's name back to AWP when it was kicked out fo the AFP. Not only are nazis stupid like FairDinkum but they also don't listen. I am a Communist and believe in Marxist-Leninism. I am not retarted. Plus I am not troubled person or retarted. I have never said in my life that I was the king of the Communists or the Nazis. Once more the nazis made some thing up to make them selvs look better and sound better than other people."	1	0	1	0
45218fbfbedd2555	" Well I think, there is just plain bullying going on by the pro-infobox crowd. The present unwritten system which leaves info-boxes to the discretion of the principal content editors is best and 99% of the time it works until a bullying pro-boxer arrives off the street and inserts a box and then fights to keep it. I think infoboxes have their uses in scientific and mathematical pages and to a certain extent in political biographies. On pages connected to the arts, their use is limited and on pages concerning ancient buildings they are either over simplified to the point of downright misleading or otherwise are longer than the page. I shan't comment at the arbitration page (until necessary) as I find the pro-boxers hectoring and bullying to be distasteful. "	0	0	0	0
452d25129e42bab2	, 22 March 2012 (UTC) I have reviewed BRFA 61. It does not permit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Filter&diff;=prev&oldid;=483244966 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fokker&diff;=prev&oldid;=483249556 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fermion&diff;=prev&oldid;=483242995 as such Yobot is editing outside of approval. You are repeatedly ignoring requests and demands to stop editing. Josh Parris 22:59	0	0	0	0
452d5cc2ccd1d611	Wiki users controlling information Deliberately and purposely controlling scientific information they don't want others to see, and threatening people with warnings. this is no different to media where is so much censoring information they don't want you to see. Wikipedia is an place anyone can edit as long they have related information backed with references or sources, but just like in the media where information is controlled so is wikipedia . This wiki page has no information based on the anthropology of Native American. There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to remove information that is already proven from genetics to anthropology by many scientists. Information that has been backed edited for months all of sudden get's removes. The genetic section mentions Native american link with Asians yet it doesn't mention the fact there are even closer to Ainu yet for whatever reason somebody refuses to edit this. > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11543902 - If this is not controlling information I don't know what it is. （Talk） 11:33, 30 2012 March 2012(UTC)	0	0	0	0
4530e6137426964b	Official info? The RW official website-now defunct-listed Killalot as weighing in at 500 kg-is this canon?	0	0	0	0
45333dc5489836ca	Nope. I don't really care. I take no part nor interest in Commons which I see as a failure project of WMF and a ticking bomb. If someone uploads my images there, it is their busyness on maintaining it. I put on all images I upload to the Wikipedia. If the image gets deleted from Commons, I will upload it to Wikipedia and will decide on the best license. Irpen	0	0	0	0
4535e81d4fefa1c1	I don't recall saying it was a PR piece? I'm just saying that until you can write-up and cite every single incident like that's ever occured at every chapter, this one random piece is completely and utterly out of place and irrelevant. This is not censorship for God's sake, this is for the sake of enyclopaedic standards and proper reference. I will relocate this to the UVA Greek Life section. ~	0	0	0	0
453731786956a3eb	" ODNB Hello David, I read at Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle Ages/Resources that you had an access to ODNB and you could provide articles. I recently stumbled accross William II's bio which was available for free through their 'lives of the Week' service, and I now plan to rewrite the norman kings' articles on the french wikipedia. Could you get me William I, Henry I and Stephen articles ? Thanks a lot in advance ! PS my mail is purplehz at gmail.com. I have a totally unrelated question, but I don't want to add a new section. ALthough I guess I should? Could you give me a brief on fraternities? Are they inherently notable? Sometimes? Usually? Always? I guess it's based on the usual criteria..., but if you have any insight for me that would be great. There's a whole slew of Philipino frats up at AfD including a ""list of"". And I know how much you like lists of! If you're busy no worries. Holler back when you have time. Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia and your willingness to help me out by sharing your viewpoints. I probably should have told that young author their book would be difficult (very) to get included. I guess I was trying to be positive and hoping for the best... live and learn. ) It would be easier if I could send them directly, because one cant put attachments in WP email, so please email me from here to give me your email address. If you also want Henry II. & Richard, let me know. It would be good to use other modern sources also; there are good recent bios of all. Hello, I sent you an email through wikipedia. You're right, the Angevins kings would be interested too ! You now have my email address (purplehz -at- gmail.com). Regards I didn't requested articles to someone else recently, to answer your question. Regards, As for fraternities, my understanding of the current practice for US fraternities is that all established national college fraternities are notable, but (as for local chapters of all organizations), their individual chapters almost never are, unless there is something rally special. Fraternities at a single college have usually been rejected at AfD, but not always. Fraternities with a few chapters only, it varies. I'll look at the afd. There is a certain reluctance to include organisations in countries where most people here cannot judge the importancethis can be called either sensible realism, or cultural bias.' On the issue of Fraternities, I would tend to think the ""Alpha"" or first chapter of a fraternity or sorority Organization would hold a right to have a wiki page dedicated to it, as typically the ""Alpha"" or first chapter holds the most information on the fraternity/sorority's creation and history. tombstone00 Fatality Perhaps its time we opened an ANI report about his constant tagging of acceptable new articles? [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld\| Count Blofeld]] Please doI need to go back to sleep. ' Crngrob with just 33 people looks like a lot of encyclopedic information could be written about it. Have a good sleep! [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld\| Count Blofeld]] David (or others watching), when you wake up can you possibly look to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of town tramway systems in Asia? I'd already voted before I realised it was one in a series of dubious noms. It's a universal keep so far, just like the others. StarM Hi DGG, thanks for disabling the speedy deletions that poor unfortunate was dealing out today willy-nilly. A couple of times I have put hours of work into an article just to have it deleted by some negatively minded person 3 minutes after they have put a speedy deletion tag on the article. I put	0	0	0	0
453a308b7baab17f	.. you bliv in all that spirit shit, dont u....and then u hide by calling others the same... ian ian ian ian ian ian....what r u doing.. sikander is standing next to me, chanting....lol....	1	0	0	0
4540dd85c5954ed6	Pictures Came in Hi Rick I got the recent pics of yourself came in! Thanks, Your friend Pat )	0	0	0	0
45441fc822d614db	" This section should be removed or put on a secondary page. Preloaded content is not important enough to deserve such a large portion of the article. Perhaps something like ""The Halo edition contains x halo trailers and y red vs blue episodes"" would be appropriate, but a full listing just clutters the article. "	0	0	0	0
45503eed26ca825f	Ironically, the user that insists on Britannica's numbers from the early 1900s complains that CIA's numbers are not recent enough.	0	0	0	0
455a2108a3653d27	Well done Jvstvs you just convinced an admin that you are actually telling the truth.	0	0	0	0
455c55b23d7eb542	Regarding Thomas D. Brock. There were a number of broken links on the page which I either corrected or deleted. Those I deleted did no longer exist. In several cases, I replaced a link with one that did exist. Regarding the Awards section: Most of these do not have an on-line citation. However, deleting them seems harsh. I would put them back. (I'm new to this Wikipedia business.)	0	0	0	0
455c7a0c94bdffa6	" This is unacceptable. You must unblock me at once. That was not a ""personal attack"". It is a simple reality, and completely warranted following various attacks, including accusing me of making a deletion nomination that ""is arguably pointy"". This user simply disagreed with my decision to delete that article, which I do believe should be deleted. His attacks and harassment on my talk page were unacceptable, and hence I ignored him. I have no extreme positions. In fact, I'd argue that you are not fit to block me even If I should've been blocked, given that you've been WP:INVOLVED in a dispute with me on this very same subject matter. The fact that you call my positions ""extreme"" when they are supported by policy, and then block me for them, is unacceptable. Absolutely unacceptable. Unblock me at once, and let someone WP:UNINVOLVED block me if they see fit. — ☎ "	0	0	0	0
4564b3d24d07ae91	"I see in the FF Talk section you seem to think the ""Shedding Light"" article is not sourcedmy recommendation is to read it again, as everything I've read there contains manifold sources (a lot of them previously unpublished, like the Court records, where the author specifically quotes the Judge's decision in the case), and I know that major media outlets (not that they're infallible) have used it as source material for many years. I do see someone agreeing with this already posted on the Talk page."	0	0	0	0
456a8e41a8c4550f	You don't know the fucking Jews, you stupid fucking wog.	1	1	1	1
45706536644acd89	" Clearly you know very little about these bands as you wouldn't be saying some of the things you are. You are Greenwald, right? You've basically used this article to ballwash his lousy book that is in fact another stepping stone in the falsification of a misunderstood sub-genre of hardcore music that was born with the worst name in the history of genre titles. If you're not him, then I hope he's paid you well to pimp his nam here. You know why these things are so little known? Because the people that know about it, that care about it, aren't writing for Rolling Stone/Spin or sharing their thoughts on some famous blog or anything like that. Where are these so-called reputable sources? I don't need some celebrity gossip site telling me a band is emo-pop (what?) and having this site link to that as if it's factually correct. I see a solid 9 links to the Billboard charts, all for completely off-topic, non-emo related material. I must say the standard set for good sources here is criminally low. None of this is my point of view, because I am simply talking about facts and events that really happened. Yes those bands were real in the 90's, and yes they played what is really emo. Then the mainstream caught ahold of it and ruined it by plugging bands like SDRE and Weezer that had nothing to do with it. That's what really happened. Why would there not be countless tales of this happening? Because the mainstream media, the only people that can put out articles in the mid-90's before the internet buzz, never heard of the damn word until those kind of popular bands started having it associated with their name. ""Oh emo, that must be emotional right? And listen to this band. They don't sound like anything else out there today. Emo it is!"" You think I'm an elitist, but I'm just being a realist. I see the full puzzle here. What you're presenting in this Greenwald-quote stealing essay is only part of the puzzle. The only thing revisionist is the idea that these pop-punk/indie rock bands had anything to do with a genre that was already changing and evolving from the hardcore scene it began in back in the 80's. But no, let's not give those bands a single sentence of credit in this poorly written article. "	0	0	0	0
457477b1ec698f91	" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. '''Cheers, ) Dlohcierekim''' "	0	0	0	0
4574f51ebeaf505a	September 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	0	0	0	0
4578f54d218cc677	" importance In general, articles are placed into ""Top"" importance if they are referenced as ""see also"" in the main article, as they are, as it were, the effective ""second"" articles on the subject that someone looking for information would see. All those articles which I had marked as ""Top"" are referenced in such a way in the main Intelligent design article. I do note that the project at present doesn't have the same phrasing for determining assessments as some of the other projects. I've noted in the past that Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany has among the most easily understood ways of determining assessment in their importance scale, and basically follow its guidelines even for other projects, at least in regard to the main sub-articles of the main article itself. I was actually thinking of trying to adjust those ratings to fit more easily for the id project, but am having some trouble with phrasing it. If, of course, you believe that the articles do not deserve such priority, feel free to adjust them. I make mistakes more often than I really like to admit. "	0	0	0	0
457d4161ad7e245c	"More of your hypothetical opinions - totally irrelevant to ""The Facts"" !!! It's common knowledge that no escapees' have intentions of getting recaptured, therefore the reason they escape! It wasn't Hodson's intention to get shot when he bashed Walker on the head with a huge iron bar, then continued to chase him so he could bash him some more - a silly dangerous action, with all those armed prison guards at the scene, aiming to fire. An iron bar was always handy to bash prisoners', in legal terms it's called criminal assault with a deadly weapon !!! "	0	0	0	0
458086c8145d1691	" Let's recap. After the Gibraltarpedia controversy broke last month, existing Gibraltar-related DYK nominations were put on hold while a discussion took place on options for dealing with them and with future nominations. Andreas did not participate in that discussion. Its outcome is summarised in the box at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options. There was nearly unanimous agreement that DYKs should go forward, as long as they met the DYK requirements and that any COI/promotional aspects were explicitly addressed by reviewers. A temporary requirement for a second reviewer was also added to ensure improved scrutiny of the nominations. As a result of the brief moratorium, a backlog built up of articles that had temporarily been held back from the Main Page. This backlog has now almost entirely been cleared. There has been no suggestion that any specific article should not have run because of being ""promotional"". Andreas is wrong to claim that there was an agreement to run ""one a day"". In fact there was no consensus on this suggestion. There are further articles now in the nomination queue, awaiting review, but there is no reason to suppose that they will appear at the same frequency. I anticipate that they will appear over the course of several weeks. Let's be clear: Andreas is taking an extreme position that any article on any topic relating to Gibraltar is ""promotional"" and should not be allowed, even if it passes every DYK criterion and even if there is no conceivable promotional aspect. (Cases in point: Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice, a war memorial; Trafalgar Cemetery, a disused historic graveyard; Moorish Gibraltar, a history of Gibraltar from 711 to 1462). This position has been rejected by the vast majority of people who have commented on this issue. He cites out-of-context quotes from a YouTube video while ignoring the fact that nobody is directing the development of these articles - people are simply writing about things that interest them, whether or not they have any ""promotional"" value. He ignores the fact that specific topics have often been the subject of frequent coverage on DYK. Recent examples have included the Olympics and Paralympics, racehorses (120 DYKs), Indonesia (300 DYKs in the last year), mushrooms, Bach cantatas and so on. In absolute terms these have had a far greater amount of coverage and higher frequencies. In short, Andreas is singling out one topic area and numerous good-faith contributors who have written articles of undisputed high quality, on the basis of what a couple of people, who are not writing or directing articles, have said about it. This is wrong. "	0	0	0	0
4580fcc03bb151e3	" Wind-up??? Surely this is a Wrexham or Shrewsbury fan messing around? The overwhelming majority of Chester City supporters are very sceptical as to why Vaughan gets (or hopefully ""got"" if this loan move becomes permanent) in the team as he looks, to be kind, average. His effort can't be faulted but his ability certainly can! As for captain, even the few fans who think he's good enough can't justify a 21 year old son of the chairman being skipper. "	0	0	0	0
45820a14f5acb125	Yes.. pre-embryological... dunno about anybody else but wikipedia seem big enough for all of us... so i for one am not proposing we go anywhere!! although I wonder if (one day) a 'wiki-book' dedicated to information for patient's could be good? also wonder if a highly formalised future wiki could seriously compete with medical textbooks. but that is just pie in the sky thinking. btw i too think the 'mess' is fantastic... I guess we should all recruit new members! I claim Alteripse as my recruit (gedday Alteripse!) - still have a long way to catch up with JFDW tho! the proposal i've made is really just an add on suggestion to the good work already done you all.	0	0	0	0
458387060efe85ae	where is the authore in this page	0	0	0	0
459dae29b7b0696c	2014 (UTC) For the record: all of the copyvio content was removed by me, just now. 23:26, 28 June	0	0	0	0
45abdc7e0ee3c513	" Yopie, your edits are huge pro Czech POV. First, you are citing really bad book about Czech history, and second there wasn't so much people ""in the area"" as you pointed it out. Majority were Polish with notable and fairly sizeable German and Czech communities, not to mention lively Jewish community which you do not even mention. There are plenty of documents about situation in Zaolzie in archives. Article about ČT is NPOV now, vandals like you are trying to rewrite history and confuse readers. "	0	0	0	0
45ade13d1ce0a65f	Is Vhesh cool or what? YES!!!!	0	0	0	0
45aea8fdaf5ab49b	Do you want me to quote each pertinent section?	0	0	0	0
45aedc61768932e4	. Generally I will reply on this page if you leave a message	0	0	0	0
45ba8b70e7f5925b	Adamslinger, firstly I suggest you go back and read the policy on Conflict of Interest I provided above which provides an explanation as to how an editor who has any connection with the article or text should behave. Secondly, regarding the Recruitment article your reference to the content having been lifted from your article I have gone back to look in August when it was added only to find you had added this content yourself see here. Such a blatant bit of copyright violation see WP:COPYVIO and conflict of interest justifies its removal straight away which I will do shortly. Frankly, it would have been a bit more transparent if you had said it was you who had lifted it! Turning to the Sainsbury's article and reference to Jamie Oliver I have remedied this by adding an article from The Grocer which addresses the need for a citation. There is no way you could add this citation back in yourself nor given what we know now about the article in ATM could it be valid for anyone else to use this citation now without it been see as vicariously offending WP:PROMO. Probably the best takeaway piece of advice the various policies provide which I have oft seen repeated by Admins is for those with any possible or perceived conflict or close association / connection with an subject area or article or specific content is to avoid editing directly, and if making any suggestions on the Talk Page always state your connection with the article etc. There is also little patience with those who abuse these policies and bans and blocks are quite normal. Hope this helps.	0	0	0	0
45bab2cbbfe68674	" The Royal Waggon Train Hi. Could you take a quick look at this article? My gut feeling (and that's all it is) is it looks like a copyvio from a book source, but the usual scripts don't report any online violations and I don't have the offline source to prove anything. I could copyedit the entire article from top to bottom, but I'd be uncomfortable doing that without more than the cursory knowledge of the topic I currently have. The username ""rwteditor"" suggests they might be affiliated with the National Army Museum which has an exhibition of the Royal Waggon train - again, can't prove anything. How might we proceed? (talk) (cont) "	0	0	0	0
45bc1865532da4e7	I'd say it was a different Mr. McCormick. Similar attire, but his facial stucture and hair was different. They might have been brothers, but they certainly were not one-and-the-same.	0	0	0	0
45c17f2236a49681	Hi afghani beggar refugee i love to suck the puti of ur amma ;)	1	1	1	1
45c2204bd6e6e675	Suspected use of another IP address Based on edits, it appears the user of this IP address has also posted at 67.175.163.15.	0	0	0	0
45c38aed02088e42	I promise to never do ANYTHING bad again. ````	0	0	0	0
45cdab84707d1e68	Wikified and tidy up completed Have done the above and also added some extra info re this tribe. Have removed the wikify and clean up tags. Article completely improved.	0	0	0	0
45cee94a0224cc9a	That's a good idea, and great outcome of my original post, thank you.	0	0	0	0
45d3174bdb4fd8f1	font>]] 06:04, 6 December	0	0	0	0
45d699d49136041d	Hey, what I put on the Talk page is none of your business. I made no edit to the page proper. 71.102.2.128	0	0	0	0
45d6a0aee77a1aed	" Introduction ""Stephens City celebrated its semiquincentennial, or 250th anniversary, on September 1, 2008. A large section of the center of the town, comprising 65 acres (26 ha), is part of the Newtown-Stephensburg Historic District, listed in 1992 on the National Register of Historic Places."" This paragraph in the introduction consists of two completely unrelated subjects. The 250th anniversary is already mentioned later in the article, so this sentence can probably be removed. The historic district sentence, then, could be incorporated somewhere else in the article. In fact, it is mentioned in the ""20th century to present"" section so maybe we can move it there. I will make these changes tomorrow if no one objects. Also, as I mentioned in my edit comment, I think the word ""semiquincentennial"" should be removed. If a word is so obscure that you have to clarify what it means, why not just use the clarification instead? It looks a like a case of using a big word for the sake of using a big word. Again, I will make these changes tomorrow after giving ample time for comment. Thanks! "	0	0	0	0
45db342666344492	BTW - the wording on Wikipedia:Selected_anniversaries/August_9 looks good to me. It would be quite nice to mention that it was the second and last time a nuclear weapon was used, but I can't find a way to phrase it concisely.	0	0	0	0
45e295d557a59c5b	Spelling consistency Landwehr or Landwehr? - I think the latter as it's not an English word. Cuirassier or cuirassier? - I think the former as there have been cuirassiers back to the English Civil War. Carabinier or carabinier? - I think the latter as it's not an English word. La Haye or La Haie? - I think the latter for consistency with the map. Zieten or Ziethen? - I think the latter for consistency with the map. Regiment / regiment, Brigade / brigade, Corps / corps - we are all over the place with this. I think it should be uppercase when describing a specific formation (2nd Brigade) but lowercase when describing one generally (Lobau's corps, but VI Corps).	0	0	0	0
45e4431ba3da3e4b	"====Regarding edits made during October 11 2006 (UTC)==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~ vipr "	0	0	0	0
45e800e8953c8a56	" Marnanel, I most certainly do have something to say about the text I authored. You are promoting people who have counterfeited my work and that is a crime. There are RICO laws that protect me from that which apply to the Wikipedia. Why are you so persistant to keep yourself involved in this article? You are making an avid attempt to harm me and my authorship I simply will not tolerate it. I do not think that Wikipedia wants to be known as ""Yellow Journalism."" Are you aware of the liability that you are causing me personal hardship over this. I am going to ask mediation to remove you from this article. I do not need all this aggrevation that you personally are causing me. Carolyn Joyce Carty"	0	0	0	0
45e90ed50e01a528	" Leila? Leila was Matthew's sister? First I've heard of it, can anyone corroborate this? talk "	0	0	0	0
45e97aa4d9df43ca	Other uses Solaria is also Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente Nukeless	0	0	0	0
45eac2685e4b8e1f	" (UTC) Why is Evan Rachel Wood in the ""Starring"" section of this article? She was only ever a recurring role on the show? 13:04, 7 April 2011"	0	0	0	0
45f199de9df2afc7	" Fixed by reverting , not sure why they thought that was a helpful edit Talk "	0	0	0	0
45f1f33a3eeb5d5d	What are your credentials Mr. Tony Fox sir?	0	0	0	0
45f5b16822e351e0	" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Netcompany3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ~Ttony21(talk, contribs) "	0	0	0	0
45f75ceb7e052bd1	Yeah Will I know, but so do you: it's the same people from the same place to doing the same thing. I'm being defamed here. They are supporting a particular POV.	0	0	0	0
45fb3de0bfb400ab	what i mean is that as a fan group we are tight........and that the case was also picked up by various others.......as i had picked it up from somebody else.......check the edits and you can probably tell based on the various different IPs........but i guess logic isnt something you guys understand at all see how that works?? again........im not sure which of you idiots came to the conclusion that i had created another account........but i would suggest showing me some sort of proof to that if not......i expect my account to be re-instated as of today.......which it was originally going to to be	0	0	0	0
460e353cffdb781d	" IQ I removed the reference to his IQ from the lead. It was a blog source, with nothing but speculation rather than facts. Unencyclopedic. talk "	0	0	0	0
460e4811a6870f15	" 1. I am sure that YOUTUBE knows MORE THAN YOU about copyright violations, so the simple fact that those videos exists and are accepted ob YouTube for more than a year, proves you wrong. 2. The material I added is linked to a VERIFIABLE source. A TV NEWS story. Accordingly to Section 107 of the copyright law, ""fair use for nonprofit educational purposes"", the video material taken from MAINSTREAM GERMAN MEDIA (again, recorded accordingly to Section 107 of the copyright law) is cited as a reference and furthermore IT EXISTS outside Wikipedia on a 3rd party server, YOUTUBE, that apparently DOESN'T think that it violates copyright laws. 3. Do you speak German? NO! So before assessing the material, learn proper German."	0	0	0	0
461935246718afb2	HyperVM is a very insecure system. Sure, it uses SSL, but all you need is brute force attack the web-address for it, and you'll have root access to entire VPS filesystems. It's embarrassing how many VPS-hosts are using this.	0	0	0	0
461c39af132a0ba5	REDIRECT Talk:Defensively equipped merchant ship	0	0	0	0
461d1f089bc0803f	" Actually I might keep him in and just change his father. Projectors "	0	0	0	0
46283a558d4d05f7	" There are many people like me who totally agree with Jimbo's stance, and we don't normally pile on because very little could be added to what Jimbo wrote above, and because it is pointless to add ""me too"" commentary. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy where every procedure is fully documented, and you will never find a rulebook specifying just how unethical a paid advocate can be before they are banned. "	0	0	0	0
462ab95fb6d7b4fb	there is no article on better you kno and there should be yall know lol she is the menet singer but memory lane is the bomb digty lol hahahahaha	0	0	0	0
462bf7adea7838b0	. You have been warned.	0	0	0	0
462ce5293489e33c	so could you please help me thank you.	0	0	0	0
46333b9b4f51de55	" I can't access each image individually! (talk✉) "	0	0	0	0
4637130329de898c	" Wikistalkers by erstwhile administrators deserve severe sanctions I have been wikistalked by an administrator Hu12 and his coconspirator, Barek. The dispute arose because I had put in a link to a Central Michigan University timeline on lighthouses in Michigan in an article on Marquette, Michigan the link was perfectly appropriate, and was not a commercial site or spam. I received a note from Barek saying he had deleted the link on the Discussion page. I told him it was a perfectly fine link and that his action was ill-advised. The next thing I knew, Hu12 intervened. The two of them started Wikistalking me together, removing not just the link, but removing the link from every page where I had put it. Additionally, they started doing blind ""Undos"" and obliterating large portions of articles that I had contributed. There was no reason for any of this. When I protested their course of action, they suspended my editing privileges. This was done precipitously. BK Conrad has investigated this matter, and deems the blind edits to be 'unfortunate.' I complained to BK Conrad, an administrator. He undid the suspension, but did not deal with my substantive complaint about this administrator. He suggested that I could contact you. I would also add that Hu12 deleted my complaints to him from his talk page (I put them back), and has now (conveniently) archived the pages. Additionally, one of my correspondents, Asher196, had noted in the history section of an article that the deletion was unwarranted. I contacted him and reported the Wikistalking. Indeed, what you will uncover, should you choose to look, is that Hu12 and Barker were engaged in wholesale eradication of my contribution from articles, sometimes to the point where the article virtually disappeared. There was no excuse for this. It is the very definition of Wikistalking. As I said, when I protested this, I was suspended. I have done a whole lot of editing here. Many thousands of edits. I have never before been accused of spamming the system. I wasn't doing this here, either. While I agree with BK that it would be best if I could just avoid these bullies, the matter is not so easily resolved. They sought me out. They attacked me. They abused their administrative privileges. While I could turn a blind eye to this, it will only encourage this untoward behavior. When Czeckoslovakia falls, Poland can't be far behind. Someone needs to report this and stop this untoward and unspeakable behavior. Based on my reading of Hu12's talk page (before it disappeared), the man has attitude problems that have surfaced before. Wikistalking by administrators will frustrate the contributors, and cause them to quit Wikipedia. They've already done that to me. Let there not be a repetition. The very lifeblood of your organization is at stake. I have attacked copies of my correspondence to and from BK Conrad and Asher196. If you need further information, please advise. I will send this to Asher196 and BKConrad, so they are informed of my complaint. Stan BK: Thank you. However, this has soured me, and I will cure myself of my wikiaholic behavior. I quit. They've achieved their victory, and Wiki will lose my modest contributions. That being said, I think you should look close at what they edited, and come to your own conclusion. They gutted whole articles. This was WIKISTALKING and they went FAR beyond what they complained about. This was search and destroy, pure, simple and unvarnished. It was a clear abuse of power. I will not abide an abuse of power, and will not let this rest without their being brought to justice they are bullies, and this was wrong. I for one would not stand silently and idly by while the Wehrmacht makes the Jews disappear into the railroad cars. Moreover, their actions showed an intent (and attempt) to bully me into silence about their misconduct. It was a cover up. Accountability in this system is important. Those who abuse their powers do not deserve to be trusted to hold the reins. They deserve the severest sanctions, and should be stripped of administrative privileges. What they did here was very destructive of the goals of an organization that depends on the good will and volunteer efforts of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (talk) Stan Coincidentally, Hu12‎ chose this interregnum of completely delete (archive) his user talk. This is after he was unmaking history and deleting my accusations of misconduct, which I put back on his page This is a Watergate style cover up. 7&6=thirt	0	0	0	0
463f36a393b890cc	To the closing Admin I believe that if you read carefully, you will find that there are a great many people and sources who declare water boarding to be torture. I fully accept that this is true: Many, perhaps most think so. I would encourage you also to recognize that there is a notable and significant minority who disagree. And in some cases they have explained reasons for this. In some cases they have not.	0	0	0	0
464505d8d4ac5f88	Blocked You have been blocked indefinitely for intentional impersonation of a known user ( (talk)	0	0	0	0
4645825554d587d0	"::YOU have described, the modus operandi of one self described supported of the Democratic Party , Gamailiel as had years to hone his ""finely tuned kraft"" of bias, steering, and snarky comments, while he wields the ban button to any one he is scared off. His history in this is unquestioned. His Hypocrisy knowns no bounds. Him and his cadra of ""meat puppets"" have long histories of ""Owning"" WP:OWN and abusing of process and power for his (their) own political ends ( plaining stated on his own talk page ""ready to fuck you up old school"". In the long run you will hurt wikipedia and your self, due to the high stakes nature of this game, and the fact that you have no morel or logical ethical leg to stand on. "	1	1	0	0
4650d0c88619e7d7	" Influence and awards Greatiest? That's a little thin, no? Perhaps we can remove this and merge the other part to a different section?Makin'Bacon "	0	0	0	0
4653f6e06d7ff37f	" Reply Great! Nice to see you back. Did you see WP:CELTICS and WP:BOSOX? - Favorite '''''Cookie "	0	0	0	0
46595fb91beb252c	If that's the case, then why don't you just desist from editing the article?	0	0	0	0
4661910b15c5bee5	I know certain people will say this is not relevant, but I have made 41 articles a GA, so I am clearly not the disruptive, bullying and owning person that I am being made out to be. If I was, I'm sure I wouldn't have been able to promote 41 articles. I'm still not even sure how what I have been blocked for even comes into this block, but I won't repeat myself.''}}	0	0	0	0
466244f9486ef480	"Why, exactly, do people find it necessary to put random nonsense on a page? The intent is supposed to be providing information that is useful to the reader. Posting ""hey every body i have a jack russell jhedbejukqrfghukwerfguwe"" does nothing of the sort. "	0	0	0	0
4662b3a67d84ae35	" ashleynn I've watched for a while. Why does your block notice say ""abusing multiple accounts""? "	0	0	0	0
466703a2dfa0a3b7	" See also WP:ANI#Edit war/conflict of interest Talk:British Gazette#Unrelated publication. "	0	0	0	0
466b3f40ad4ab719	How do I add categories to an article? Thanks	0	0	0	0
466c3698d94629c1	Apparently, plagiarism does not bother you, since you revert the material with studying it and then claim that you are in the middle of a project and can't be bothered right now. If you are in the middle of a project, how did you find time to revert my changes well explained cahnges? You collaborate with Tom [NorthShoreman], so I won't be holding my breath to see if you ever get around to correcting the plagiarism and sham citations.74.192.7.135	0	0	0	0
46767a6c9d349a00	You changed it back idiot, I did leave my reasons in the discussion page in case you have not read it. New Mexico campaign is completely wrong. Not allof the battleis in this campaign occurred in New Mexico. You changed that back but you did not bother changing back the campaignbox or the several other articles connected to it. I will be changing it back.	1	1	1	0
4678a87ab30d0f77	at the set-point speed limit	0	0	0	0
467bb3d06e714a14	my dogs breath smells of contempt look up order of krill	1	0	0	0
467f80e22bef8330	" Thank you very much for responding. Please do feel free to ask about this on the talk page of the article. I can tell you, however, that it has been discussed before, and my revert of your edit was based on previous discussion. That should not stop you from discussing this if you want to, but you should know what to expect. Again, thanks for the message in English. — "	0	0	0	0
467fcdd9dd9dc194	Good enough for me. My bad.	0	0	0	0
467ff952dae6a69e	from a page that doesn't exist	0	0	0	0
4693530886ecda4e	" But Leithp is a WikiFascist! All WikiAdmins are as they follow the philosophy of ""Resistance is Futile"""	0	0	0	0
4695f39fe068de05	Fuck the shit out of you, Nil! Learn to use better manners, or you will be banned! Aksai Chin deservedly is Chinese territory for the people living there are TIBETAN, not your motherfucking Hindu scum! Haha, so sad too bad China killed you in 1962! By the way Nil, you must really love anal fucking!	1	1	1	0
469cbc344d417ca1	You guyz are all just Elf-Masher wannabes ! None of you have contributed one word to the Dog fighting article and none of you even know about Dog Fighting.....Do Any Of You Know Have Any Elves I Can Mash??	0	0	0	0
46a9110acbed9e6a	" Perhaps I'm reading it in a different tone than you are writing it, but with all the emphasis you've added, it's coming off a bit hostile. I've made my position pretty clear. I gave you advice on what areas you needed to work in to appease the regular voters at RFA, for what the current trends are. I am under no obligation to vote with the trend. Like you said, her's is a different situation than yours. If you think her succeeding in this RFA will eventually result in her desysop, then that's your opinion. I don't agree, thus she has my support. (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
46ac553cecb99242	I am simply supporting the consensus, which is to only include nations of the British Isles. As a matter of fact, I think the Germans are a lot closer to us than the French, but someone else has been trying to argue the opposite and at the same time push all sorts of medievalist, aristocratic fantasies.	0	0	0	0
46b2ab821941ed5a	It would probably be helpful if you could find something not WMC-related to do. It's not constructive to make snide, insulting remarks like this one. In general, if you feel that there is an issue with another user's conduct, address it politely and clearly in an appropriate venue. Don't take cheap shots. (talk)	0	0	0	0
46be7baf9a543f16	" Homosexuality and race of course are the subjects to be most avoided on wikipedia, otherwise bear the consequences of people such as your self who are very sensitive of such issues going to an extreme and making the worst possible situation possible out of something that was said. A lot of its comes down to tone, a while no homosexual discussion is really advisable on wikipedia it turns out that the tonw towards myself by the others was clearly more malicious that what I dished out to others and a direct natural human response ot percieved personal attacks on myself. I'm not excusing what I said or did, but I think you are taking it far too literally rather than actually seeing I was wondering why you stick so hard with each other at all costs rather than actually calling you gay. Never mind, hell better be freezing when I return.♦ Dr. Blofeld "	0	0	0	0
46bfb6644f096461	" Ah, so you admit your violation to WP:OWN. And Bunchofgrapes little biased ""support"" (based on... well, we all know what) is simply amusing. But... then, seeing how you expect to be treated like a queen and that whatever you say goes: no. This is not your article. You do not have the rights to decide what is ""trolling"" and all of this bullsh*t. Learn your lesson, wise up, and start respecting the decisions of others. You are not the only person in this world, and you are also not anybody such as Queen Elizabeth, who would certainly rid of your rudeness without argument. I have no interest in enhancing this article any further. Let it weep all that it wants. And enough of the email-is-perfect-let's-sock conversations. I am done with you, I am done with you, I am done with you. This is history. Thank God. — \| talk "	0	0	0	0
46c5515a29fd53d7	" ""Liberal conservativism"" seems a good compromise between my source and your claims. ODS, f.e., is considered liberal conservative by the same czech wiki. Hope it fits for you. "	0	0	0	0
46c9cabc9dfacd22	I saw that you have done the work on r-flurbiprofen. Have you seen this or this? It looks like there is a new generic name.	0	0	0	0
46d5cf880820677a	" Collapsed and Closed Sections What's been going on here is people pointing out that legitimate and notable criticism of her knowledge of video games, that Anita does not meet notability standards as no credible sources (nothing even close to a peer reviewed journal) have praised her work, and a bunch of long time editors have said ""No criticism allowed because she awesome! Go away!"" The reason her work will never find its way into a psychology journal is because it is complete BS. There is a huge difference between toys made for boys and toys made for girls because corporations have done extensive market research and design to taste. It has nothing to do with a conspiracy against women that has been successful for thousands of years across every culture known to history. The fact that Anita wants girls to play games made for boys doesn't make her relevant, it makes her a fighter of reality, as well as a hypocrite. She recently expressed her anger at video game makers for including female characters but used a bow on their heads to distinguish them, even though old school graphics left few options, and ignored the fact that modern video games are able to make females distinct in many ways. Yes, bows were used to distinguish females, because women are into accessories. They could have used, I don't know, giant hoop earrings. If Anita is as adamant as she claims, she needs to free her ears of the great patriarchy's brand and shave her head. What about little boys who want to play with dolls and My Little Pony? They get teased much worse than girls who want to play video games made for boys. I guess that's because they're not manly enough, so it's still girls who are being oppressed. The idea that men and women should be treated equally in the workplace is one thing but the idea that men and women don't have fundamentally different tastes, and are the victims of an ancient conspiracy to convince us all that we do, is a bunch of BS that will never be taken seriously by any professional journal. This is why Anita is an irrelevant nobody (and proven liar: ""I love video games."" I'm not a fan of video games"") and doesn't deserve a page beyond the incident where she played the victim and was given a bunch of money. I know, ""go away!""209.89.84.174 "	0	0	0	0
46dc514755dcfcdf	I know this is an old chestnut, but we should only include the Polish-Bolshevik vets who served in 1919, if that's possible to establish. Otherwise it will open the door for loads of early 20s cases. Marian Skwarski is definitely worth another search, because I think his case was most similar to Wycech's. I seem to have added the wrong link there. 212.183.134.210 Captain celery	0	0	0	0
46de67c1c7c74f42	yo should stop reverting my edictions	0	0	0	0
46eaa57054c0af22	Always a pleasure to help new people and catch-up with more experienced ones - thank you for organising it! (talk)	0	0	0	0
46ee192a2d3ba7aa	Karl Möbius Professor, I added a few new sentences to the Wikipedia article on Karl Möbius. While the article addressed Möbius's research on oyster beds, it did not include where or why the research was conducted. I wrote that Möbius was commissioned by the Prussian Ministry of Agricultural Affairs to research the natural oyster beds and their profitability in the Bay of Kiel. I also included a reference to Michael Allaby's book Ecology: Plants, Animals, and the Environment. -Aidan	0	0	0	0

4518585291f1600c

" Since the topic of the article is Liberalism, I think Obama merits a mention. If you want, you could delete the adjective ""social"". As for your statement that there has been no expansion of the welfare state, I need only mention Bush II's prescription drug plan for seniors and Obama's Affordable Health Care Act. But social liberalism is not the same as welfare liberalism. It includes the end of Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the decriminalization of medical marijuana. The election of a Black president is itself a major victory for social liberalism, in a country where all previous presidents have been White. "

0

451969e805274c2d

Kiefer, if you'd like me to reply to any of these issues here, I will. Otherwise, I'm addressing them on their respective talk pages. Thanks!

0

4519a3e23491086e

" Dear soldier of the Wikipedia neo-nazi/communist dictatorship What the hell are you tlaking about. I did not re-creat any article about the formal Australian Worker's Party formaly known as the New Communist Party of Australia. I think you are high on the lies told by storm front. You the hell listens to storm front. Oh my god Wikipedia is becomeing a dumping ground for neo-nazis and altra lefties. Since I am the voice of reason. I just have to say one thing. Pleas read my reply to storm front. Here it is - Okay okay. Lats just get the fatcs right. This is what some nazi said on storm front "" Peter Watson (of Warwick, Qld.) has claimed to represent all sorts of groups, and - in forums - likes to pretend he is several people at the same time. He has a habit of claiming to be the President of organisations he has made up on the internet. He says he is 14 (or 16) years old."" Answere:- No I have not supported lotsd of groups. I have only supported the CPW , AWP (formally known as the NCPA). I was never a member of the People's Think Tank Association plus the PTTA never had a president. Plus I have only ever been one person. And that person is Peter Watson. This nazi must have a lot of time on his hands to look for information on me. So I can only come up with only one conclusion and that is simply that this man has no social or sex life. So I can only say on thing ""go get a life man and get a women"". Peter was President of the ""People's Think Tank Association"" based in Warwick, which he says ""split from the Communist Party of Australia just recently and they publish the Caller"" Answere:- I was never the president of the PTTA. The PTTA was never ever created. The Caller was a fake news paper. As fare as I know it was only ever printed once by some nazi. Since the PTTA was never realy so how cna it split from the CPA. So many questions and not enough answeres. The man just doesn't have a life. Peter was ""President of the New Communist Party of Australia"" and ""Chairman of the Central Committee"" (this is in his Communist International News) Answere:- I was the president but not the had of the NCPA. I was the chairman of the central commitee. But as you might know the NCPA and the AWP are the same group. The AWP change its name to NCPA but change it's name back soon after remember you stupid nazi. Peter was ""President of the Communist Party of Warwick"" Answere:- Only for a short number of times in the hsitory fot he party that I was the presidnet of it. Peter also says: ""the New Communist Party of Australia (NCPA) , The People Think Tank Association (PTTA) and the Communist Socialist Workers Front (CSWF) did dissolve and absorbed into the Australia First Party (AFP)"". Answere:- The Communist Socialist Worker's Front never ever was created and never was real. It just goes to show that nazis just makes things up to help them selvs. The PTTA was never real. If you are aksing why I made the CSWF and the PTTA up well it was just for fun. Peter has also set up the ""Australian Worker's Party"" Answere:- This nazi (FairDinkum) is a idiot. I have said this many times that it was started in april was a split from the CPW that changed it's name to NCPA than change it's name back to AWP when it was kicked out fo the AFP. Not only are nazis stupid like FairDinkum but they also don't listen. I am a Communist and believe in Marxist-Leninism. I am not retarted. Plus I am not troubled person or retarted. I have never said in my life that I was the king of the Communists or the Nazis. Once more the nazis made some thing up to make them selvs look better and sound better than other people."

1

0

1

0

45218fbfbedd2555

" Well I think, there is just plain bullying going on by the pro-infobox crowd. The present unwritten system which leaves info-boxes to the discretion of the principal content editors is best and 99% of the time it works until a bullying pro-boxer arrives off the street and inserts a box and then fights to keep it. I think infoboxes have their uses in scientific and mathematical pages and to a certain extent in political biographies. On pages connected to the arts, their use is limited and on pages concerning ancient buildings they are either over simplified to the point of downright misleading or otherwise are longer than the page. I shan't comment at the arbitration page (until necessary) as I find the pro-boxers hectoring and bullying to be distasteful. "

0

452d25129e42bab2

, 22 March 2012 (UTC) I have reviewed BRFA 61. It does not permit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Filter&diff;=prev&oldid;=483244966 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fokker&diff;=prev&oldid;=483249556 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fermion&diff;=prev&oldid;=483242995 as such Yobot is editing outside of approval. You are repeatedly ignoring requests and demands to stop editing. Josh Parris 22:59

0

452d5cc2ccd1d611

Wiki users controlling information Deliberately and purposely controlling scientific information they don't want others to see, and threatening people with warnings. this is no different to media where is so much censoring information they don't want you to see. Wikipedia is an place anyone can edit as long they have related information backed with references or sources, but just like in the media where information is controlled so is wikipedia . This wiki page has no information based on the anthropology of Native American. There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to remove information that is already proven from genetics to anthropology by many scientists. Information that has been backed edited for months all of sudden get's removes. The genetic section mentions Native american link with Asians yet it doesn't mention the fact there are even closer to Ainu yet for whatever reason somebody refuses to edit this. > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11543902 - If this is not controlling information I don't know what it is. （Talk） 11:33, 30 2012 March 2012(UTC)

0

4530e6137426964b

Official info? The RW official website-now defunct-listed Killalot as weighing in at 500 kg-is this canon?

0

45333dc5489836ca

Nope. I don't really care. I take no part nor interest in Commons which I see as a failure project of WMF and a ticking bomb. If someone uploads my images there, it is their busyness on maintaining it. I put on all images I upload to the Wikipedia. If the image gets deleted from Commons, I will upload it to Wikipedia and will decide on the best license. Irpen

0

4535e81d4fefa1c1

I don't recall saying it was a PR piece? I'm just saying that until you can write-up and cite every single incident like that's ever occured at every chapter, this one random piece is completely and utterly out of place and irrelevant. This is not censorship for God's sake, this is for the sake of enyclopaedic standards and proper reference. I will relocate this to the UVA Greek Life section. ~

0

453731786956a3eb

" ODNB Hello David, I read at Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle Ages/Resources that you had an access to ODNB and you could provide articles. I recently stumbled accross William II's bio which was available for free through their 'lives of the Week' service, and I now plan to rewrite the norman kings' articles on the french wikipedia. Could you get me William I, Henry I and Stephen articles ? Thanks a lot in advance ! PS my mail is purplehz at gmail.com. I have a totally unrelated question, but I don't want to add a new section. ALthough I guess I should? Could you give me a brief on fraternities? Are they inherently notable? Sometimes? Usually? Always? I guess it's based on the usual criteria..., but if you have any insight for me that would be great. There's a whole slew of Philipino frats up at AfD including a ""list of"". And I know how much you like lists of! If you're busy no worries. Holler back when you have time. Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia and your willingness to help me out by sharing your viewpoints. I probably should have told that young author their book would be difficult (very) to get included. I guess I was trying to be positive and hoping for the best... live and learn. ) It would be easier if I could send them directly, because one cant put attachments in WP email, so please email me from here to give me your email address. If you also want Henry II. & Richard, let me know. It would be good to use other modern sources also; there are good recent bios of all. Hello, I sent you an email through wikipedia. You're right, the Angevins kings would be interested too ! You now have my email address (purplehz -at- gmail.com). Regards I didn't requested articles to someone else recently, to answer your question. Regards, As for fraternities, my understanding of the current practice for US fraternities is that all established national college fraternities are notable, but (as for local chapters of all organizations), their individual chapters almost never are, unless there is something rally special. Fraternities at a single college have usually been rejected at AfD, but not always. Fraternities with a few chapters only, it varies. I'll look at the afd. There is a certain reluctance to include organisations in countries where most people here cannot judge the importancethis can be called either sensible realism, or cultural bias.' On the issue of Fraternities, I would tend to think the ""Alpha"" or first chapter of a fraternity or sorority Organization would hold a right to have a wiki page dedicated to it, as typically the ""Alpha"" or first chapter holds the most information on the fraternity/sorority's creation and history. tombstone00 Fatality Perhaps its time we opened an ANI report about his constant tagging of acceptable new articles? [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| Count Blofeld]] Please doI need to go back to sleep. ' Crngrob with just 33 people looks like a lot of encyclopedic information could be written about it. Have a good sleep! [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| Count Blofeld]] David (or others watching), when you wake up can you possibly look to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of town tramway systems in Asia? I'd already voted before I realised it was one in a series of dubious noms. It's a universal keep so far, just like the others. StarM Hi DGG, thanks for disabling the speedy deletions that poor unfortunate was dealing out today willy-nilly. A couple of times I have put hours of work into an article just to have it deleted by some negatively minded person 3 minutes after they have put a speedy deletion tag on the article. I put

0

453a308b7baab17f

.. you bliv in all that spirit shit, dont u....and then u hide by calling others the same... ian ian ian ian ian ian....what r u doing.. sikander is standing next to me, chanting....lol....

1

0

4540dd85c5954ed6

Pictures Came in Hi Rick I got the recent pics of yourself came in! Thanks, Your friend Pat )

0

45441fc822d614db

" This section should be removed or put on a secondary page. Preloaded content is not important enough to deserve such a large portion of the article. Perhaps something like ""The Halo edition contains x halo trailers and y red vs blue episodes"" would be appropriate, but a full listing just clutters the article. "

0

45503eed26ca825f

Ironically, the user that insists on Britannica's numbers from the early 1900s complains that CIA's numbers are not recent enough.

0

455a2108a3653d27

Well done Jvstvs you just convinced an admin that you are actually telling the truth.

0

455c55b23d7eb542

Regarding Thomas D. Brock. There were a number of broken links on the page which I either corrected or deleted. Those I deleted did no longer exist. In several cases, I replaced a link with one that did exist. Regarding the Awards section: Most of these do not have an on-line citation. However, deleting them seems harsh. I would put them back. (I'm new to this Wikipedia business.)

0

455c7a0c94bdffa6

" This is unacceptable. You must unblock me at once. That was not a ""personal attack"". It is a simple reality, and completely warranted following various attacks, including accusing me of making a deletion nomination that ""is arguably pointy"". This user simply disagreed with my decision to delete that article, which I do believe should be deleted. His attacks and harassment on my talk page were unacceptable, and hence I ignored him. I have no extreme positions. In fact, I'd argue that you are not fit to block me even If I should've been blocked, given that you've been WP:INVOLVED in a dispute with me on this very same subject matter. The fact that you call my positions ""extreme"" when they are supported by policy, and then block me for them, is unacceptable. Absolutely unacceptable. Unblock me at once, and let someone WP:UNINVOLVED block me if they see fit. — ☎ "

0

4564b3d24d07ae91

"I see in the FF Talk section you seem to think the ""Shedding Light"" article is not sourcedmy recommendation is to read it again, as everything I've read there contains manifold sources (a lot of them previously unpublished, like the Court records, where the author specifically quotes the Judge's decision in the case), and I know that major media outlets (not that they're infallible) have used it as source material for many years. I do see someone agreeing with this already posted on the Talk page."

0

456a8e41a8c4550f

You don't know the fucking Jews, you stupid fucking wog.

1

0

1

0

1

45706536644acd89

" Clearly you know very little about these bands as you wouldn't be saying some of the things you are. You are Greenwald, right? You've basically used this article to ballwash his lousy book that is in fact another stepping stone in the falsification of a misunderstood sub-genre of hardcore music that was born with the worst name in the history of genre titles. If you're not him, then I hope he's paid you well to pimp his nam here. You know why these things are so little known? Because the people that know about it, that care about it, aren't writing for Rolling Stone/Spin or sharing their thoughts on some famous blog or anything like that. Where are these so-called reputable sources? I don't need some celebrity gossip site telling me a band is emo-pop (what?) and having this site link to that as if it's factually correct. I see a solid 9 links to the Billboard charts, all for completely off-topic, non-emo related material. I must say the standard set for good sources here is criminally low. None of this is my point of view, because I am simply talking about facts and events that really happened. Yes those bands were real in the 90's, and yes they played what is really emo. Then the mainstream caught ahold of it and ruined it by plugging bands like SDRE and Weezer that had nothing to do with it. That's what really happened. Why would there not be countless tales of this happening? Because the mainstream media, the only people that can put out articles in the mid-90's before the internet buzz, never heard of the damn word until those kind of popular bands started having it associated with their name. ""Oh emo, that must be emotional right? And listen to this band. They don't sound like anything else out there today. Emo it is!"" You think I'm an elitist, but I'm just being a realist. I see the full puzzle here. What you're presenting in this Greenwald-quote stealing essay is only part of the puzzle. The only thing revisionist is the idea that these pop-punk/indie rock bands had anything to do with a genre that was already changing and evolving from the hardcore scene it began in back in the 80's. But no, let's not give those bands a single sentence of credit in this poorly written article. "

0

457477b1ec698f91

" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. '''Cheers, ) Dlohcierekim''' "

0

4574f51ebeaf505a

September 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

0

4578f54d218cc677

" importance In general, articles are placed into ""Top"" importance if they are referenced as ""see also"" in the main article, as they are, as it were, the effective ""second"" articles on the subject that someone looking for information would see. All those articles which I had marked as ""Top"" are referenced in such a way in the main Intelligent design article. I do note that the project at present doesn't have the same phrasing for determining assessments as some of the other projects. I've noted in the past that Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany has among the most easily understood ways of determining assessment in their importance scale, and basically follow its guidelines even for other projects, at least in regard to the main sub-articles of the main article itself. I was actually thinking of trying to adjust those ratings to fit more easily for the id project, but am having some trouble with phrasing it. If, of course, you believe that the articles do not deserve such priority, feel free to adjust them. I make mistakes more often than I really like to admit. "

0

457d4161ad7e245c

"More of your hypothetical opinions - totally irrelevant to ""The Facts"" !!! It's common knowledge that no escapees' have intentions of getting recaptured, therefore the reason they escape! It wasn't Hodson's intention to get shot when he bashed Walker on the head with a huge iron bar, then continued to chase him so he could bash him some more - a silly dangerous action, with all those armed prison guards at the scene, aiming to fire. An iron bar was always handy to bash prisoners', in legal terms it's called criminal assault with a deadly weapon !!! "

0

458086c8145d1691

" Let's recap. After the Gibraltarpedia controversy broke last month, existing Gibraltar-related DYK nominations were put on hold while a discussion took place on options for dealing with them and with future nominations. Andreas did not participate in that discussion. Its outcome is summarised in the box at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options. There was nearly unanimous agreement that DYKs should go forward, as long as they met the DYK requirements and that any COI/promotional aspects were explicitly addressed by reviewers. A temporary requirement for a second reviewer was also added to ensure improved scrutiny of the nominations. As a result of the brief moratorium, a backlog built up of articles that had temporarily been held back from the Main Page. This backlog has now almost entirely been cleared. There has been no suggestion that any specific article should not have run because of being ""promotional"". Andreas is wrong to claim that there was an agreement to run ""one a day"". In fact there was no consensus on this suggestion. There are further articles now in the nomination queue, awaiting review, but there is no reason to suppose that they will appear at the same frequency. I anticipate that they will appear over the course of several weeks. Let's be clear: Andreas is taking an extreme position that any article on any topic relating to Gibraltar is ""promotional"" and should not be allowed, even if it passes every DYK criterion and even if there is no conceivable promotional aspect. (Cases in point: Gibraltar Cross of Sacrifice, a war memorial; Trafalgar Cemetery, a disused historic graveyard; Moorish Gibraltar, a history of Gibraltar from 711 to 1462). This position has been rejected by the vast majority of people who have commented on this issue. He cites out-of-context quotes from a YouTube video while ignoring the fact that nobody is directing the development of these articles - people are simply writing about things that interest them, whether or not they have any ""promotional"" value. He ignores the fact that specific topics have often been the subject of frequent coverage on DYK. Recent examples have included the Olympics and Paralympics, racehorses (120 DYKs), Indonesia (300 DYKs in the last year), mushrooms, Bach cantatas and so on. In absolute terms these have had a far greater amount of coverage and higher frequencies. In short, Andreas is singling out one topic area and numerous good-faith contributors who have written articles of undisputed high quality, on the basis of what a couple of people, who are not writing or directing articles, have said about it. This is wrong. "

0

4580fcc03bb151e3

" Wind-up??? Surely this is a Wrexham or Shrewsbury fan messing around? The overwhelming majority of Chester City supporters are very sceptical as to why Vaughan gets (or hopefully ""got"" if this loan move becomes permanent) in the team as he looks, to be kind, average. His effort can't be faulted but his ability certainly can! As for captain, even the few fans who think he's good enough can't justify a 21 year old son of the chairman being skipper. "

0

45820a14f5acb125

Yes.. pre-embryological... dunno about anybody else but wikipedia seem big enough for all of us... so i for one am not proposing we go anywhere!! although I wonder if (one day) a 'wiki-book' dedicated to information for patient's could be good? also wonder if a highly formalised future wiki could seriously compete with medical textbooks. but that is just pie in the sky thinking. btw i too think the 'mess' is fantastic... I guess we should all recruit new members! I claim Alteripse as my recruit (gedday Alteripse!) - still have a long way to catch up with JFDW tho! the proposal i've made is really just an add on suggestion to the good work already done you all.

0

458387060efe85ae

where is the authore in this page

0

459dae29b7b0696c

2014 (UTC) For the record: all of the copyvio content was removed by me, just now. 23:26, 28 June

0

45abdc7e0ee3c513

" Yopie, your edits are huge pro Czech POV. First, you are citing really bad book about Czech history, and second there wasn't so much people ""in the area"" as you pointed it out. Majority were Polish with notable and fairly sizeable German and Czech communities, not to mention lively Jewish community which you do not even mention. There are plenty of documents about situation in Zaolzie in archives. Article about ČT is NPOV now, vandals like you are trying to rewrite history and confuse readers. "

0

45ade13d1ce0a65f

Is Vhesh cool or what? YES!!!!

0

45aea8fdaf5ab49b

Do you want me to quote each pertinent section?

0

45aedc61768932e4

. Generally I will reply on this page if you leave a message

0

45ba8b70e7f5925b

Adamslinger, firstly I suggest you go back and read the policy on Conflict of Interest I provided above which provides an explanation as to how an editor who has any connection with the article or text should behave. Secondly, regarding the Recruitment article your reference to the content having been lifted from your article I have gone back to look in August when it was added only to find you had added this content yourself see here. Such a blatant bit of copyright violation see WP:COPYVIO and conflict of interest justifies its removal straight away which I will do shortly. Frankly, it would have been a bit more transparent if you had said it was you who had lifted it! Turning to the Sainsbury's article and reference to Jamie Oliver I have remedied this by adding an article from The Grocer which addresses the need for a citation. There is no way you could add this citation back in yourself nor given what we know now about the article in ATM could it be valid for anyone else to use this citation now without it been see as vicariously offending WP:PROMO. Probably the best takeaway piece of advice the various policies provide which I have oft seen repeated by Admins is for those with any possible or perceived conflict or close association / connection with an subject area or article or specific content is to avoid editing directly, and if making any suggestions on the Talk Page always state your connection with the article etc. There is also little patience with those who abuse these policies and bans and blocks are quite normal. Hope this helps.

0

45bab2cbbfe68674

" The Royal Waggon Train Hi. Could you take a quick look at this article? My gut feeling (and that's all it is) is it looks like a copyvio from a book source, but the usual scripts don't report any online violations and I don't have the offline source to prove anything. I could copyedit the entire article from top to bottom, but I'd be uncomfortable doing that without more than the cursory knowledge of the topic I currently have. The username ""rwteditor"" suggests they might be affiliated with the National Army Museum which has an exhibition of the Royal Waggon train - again, can't prove anything. How might we proceed? (talk) (cont) "

0

45bc1865532da4e7

I'd say it was a different Mr. McCormick. Similar attire, but his facial stucture and hair was different. They might have been brothers, but they certainly were not one-and-the-same.

0

45c17f2236a49681

Hi afghani beggar refugee i love to suck the puti of ur amma ;)

1

0

1

0

1

45c2204bd6e6e675

Suspected use of another IP address Based on edits, it appears the user of this IP address has also posted at 67.175.163.15.

0

45c38aed02088e42

I promise to never do ANYTHING bad again. ````

0

45cdab84707d1e68

Wikified and tidy up completed Have done the above and also added some extra info re this tribe. Have removed the wikify and clean up tags. Article completely improved.

0

45cee94a0224cc9a

That's a good idea, and great outcome of my original post, thank you.

0

45d3174bdb4fd8f1

font>]] 06:04, 6 December

0

45d699d49136041d

Hey, what I put on the Talk page is none of your business. I made no edit to the page proper. 71.102.2.128

0

45d6a0aee77a1aed

" Introduction ""Stephens City celebrated its semiquincentennial, or 250th anniversary, on September 1, 2008. A large section of the center of the town, comprising 65 acres (26 ha), is part of the Newtown-Stephensburg Historic District, listed in 1992 on the National Register of Historic Places."" This paragraph in the introduction consists of two completely unrelated subjects. The 250th anniversary is already mentioned later in the article, so this sentence can probably be removed. The historic district sentence, then, could be incorporated somewhere else in the article. In fact, it is mentioned in the ""20th century to present"" section so maybe we can move it there. I will make these changes tomorrow if no one objects. Also, as I mentioned in my edit comment, I think the word ""semiquincentennial"" should be removed. If a word is so obscure that you have to clarify what it means, why not just use the clarification instead? It looks a like a case of using a big word for the sake of using a big word. Again, I will make these changes tomorrow after giving ample time for comment. Thanks! "

0

45db342666344492

BTW - the wording on Wikipedia:Selected_anniversaries/August_9 looks good to me. It would be quite nice to mention that it was the second and last time a nuclear weapon was used, but I can't find a way to phrase it concisely.

0

45e295d557a59c5b

Spelling consistency Landwehr or Landwehr? - I think the latter as it's not an English word. Cuirassier or cuirassier? - I think the former as there have been cuirassiers back to the English Civil War. Carabinier or carabinier? - I think the latter as it's not an English word. La Haye or La Haie? - I think the latter for consistency with the map. Zieten or Ziethen? - I think the latter for consistency with the map. Regiment / regiment, Brigade / brigade, Corps / corps - we are all over the place with this. I think it should be uppercase when describing a specific formation (2nd Brigade) but lowercase when describing one generally (Lobau's corps, but VI Corps).

0

45e4431ba3da3e4b

"====Regarding edits made during October 11 2006 (UTC)==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~ vipr "

0

45e800e8953c8a56

" Marnanel, I most certainly do have something to say about the text I authored. You are promoting people who have counterfeited my work and that is a crime. There are RICO laws that protect me from that which apply to the Wikipedia. Why are you so persistant to keep yourself involved in this article? You are making an avid attempt to harm me and my authorship I simply will not tolerate it. I do not think that Wikipedia wants to be known as ""Yellow Journalism."" Are you aware of the liability that you are causing me personal hardship over this. I am going to ask mediation to remove you from this article. I do not need all this aggrevation that you personally are causing me. Carolyn Joyce Carty"

0

45e90ed50e01a528

" Leila? Leila was Matthew's sister? First I've heard of it, can anyone corroborate this? talk "

0

45e97aa4d9df43ca

Other uses Solaria is also Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente Nukeless

0

45eac2685e4b8e1f

" (UTC) Why is Evan Rachel Wood in the ""Starring"" section of this article? She was only ever a recurring role on the show? 13:04, 7 April 2011"

0

45f199de9df2afc7

" Fixed by reverting , not sure why they thought that was a helpful edit Talk "

0

45f1f33a3eeb5d5d

What are your credentials Mr. Tony Fox sir?

0

45f5b16822e351e0

" Sockpuppetry case You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Netcompany3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ~Ttony21(talk, contribs) "

0

45f75ceb7e052bd1

Yeah Will I know, but so do you: it's the same people from the same place to doing the same thing. I'm being defamed here. They are supporting a particular POV.

0

45fb3de0bfb400ab

what i mean is that as a fan group we are tight........and that the case was also picked up by various others.......as i had picked it up from somebody else.......check the edits and you can probably tell based on the various different IPs........but i guess logic isnt something you guys understand at all see how that works?? again........im not sure which of you idiots came to the conclusion that i had created another account........but i would suggest showing me some sort of proof to that if not......i expect my account to be re-instated as of today.......which it was originally going to to be

0

460e353cffdb781d

" IQ I removed the reference to his IQ from the lead. It was a blog source, with nothing but speculation rather than facts. Unencyclopedic. talk "

0

460e4811a6870f15

" 1. I am sure that YOUTUBE knows MORE THAN YOU about copyright violations, so the simple fact that those videos exists and are accepted ob YouTube for more than a year, proves you wrong. 2. The material I added is linked to a VERIFIABLE source. A TV NEWS story. Accordingly to Section 107 of the copyright law, ""fair use for nonprofit educational purposes"", the video material taken from MAINSTREAM GERMAN MEDIA (again, recorded accordingly to Section 107 of the copyright law) is cited as a reference and furthermore IT EXISTS outside Wikipedia on a 3rd party server, YOUTUBE, that apparently DOESN'T think that it violates copyright laws. 3. Do you speak German? NO! So before assessing the material, learn proper German."

0

461935246718afb2

HyperVM is a very insecure system. Sure, it uses SSL, but all you need is brute force attack the web-address for it, and you'll have root access to entire VPS filesystems. It's embarrassing how many VPS-hosts are using this.

0

461c39af132a0ba5

REDIRECT Talk:Defensively equipped merchant ship

0

461d1f089bc0803f

" Actually I might keep him in and just change his father. Projectors "

0

46283a558d4d05f7

" There are many people like me who totally agree with Jimbo's stance, and we don't normally pile on because very little could be added to what Jimbo wrote above, and because it is pointless to add ""me too"" commentary. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy where every procedure is fully documented, and you will never find a rulebook specifying just how unethical a paid advocate can be before they are banned. "

0

462ab95fb6d7b4fb

there is no article on better you kno and there should be yall know lol she is the menet singer but memory lane is the bomb digty lol hahahahaha

0

462bf7adea7838b0

. You have been warned.

0

462ce5293489e33c

so could you please help me thank you.

0

46333b9b4f51de55

" I can't access each image individually! (talk✉) "

0

4637130329de898c

" Wikistalkers by erstwhile administrators deserve severe sanctions I have been wikistalked by an administrator Hu12 and his coconspirator, Barek. The dispute arose because I had put in a link to a Central Michigan University timeline on lighthouses in Michigan in an article on Marquette, Michigan the link was perfectly appropriate, and was not a commercial site or spam. I received a note from Barek saying he had deleted the link on the Discussion page. I told him it was a perfectly fine link and that his action was ill-advised. The next thing I knew, Hu12 intervened. The two of them started Wikistalking me together, removing not just the link, but removing the link from every page where I had put it. Additionally, they started doing blind ""Undos"" and obliterating large portions of articles that I had contributed. There was no reason for any of this. When I protested their course of action, they suspended my editing privileges. This was done precipitously. BK Conrad has investigated this matter, and deems the blind edits to be 'unfortunate.' I complained to BK Conrad, an administrator. He undid the suspension, but did not deal with my substantive complaint about this administrator. He suggested that I could contact you. I would also add that Hu12 deleted my complaints to him from his talk page (I put them back), and has now (conveniently) archived the pages. Additionally, one of my correspondents, Asher196, had noted in the history section of an article that the deletion was unwarranted. I contacted him and reported the Wikistalking. Indeed, what you will uncover, should you choose to look, is that Hu12 and Barker were engaged in wholesale eradication of my contribution from articles, sometimes to the point where the article virtually disappeared. There was no excuse for this. It is the very definition of Wikistalking. As I said, when I protested this, I was suspended. I have done a whole lot of editing here. Many thousands of edits. I have never before been accused of spamming the system. I wasn't doing this here, either. While I agree with BK that it would be best if I could just avoid these bullies, the matter is not so easily resolved. They sought me out. They attacked me. They abused their administrative privileges. While I could turn a blind eye to this, it will only encourage this untoward behavior. When Czeckoslovakia falls, Poland can't be far behind. Someone needs to report this and stop this untoward and unspeakable behavior. Based on my reading of Hu12's talk page (before it disappeared), the man has attitude problems that have surfaced before. Wikistalking by administrators will frustrate the contributors, and cause them to quit Wikipedia. They've already done that to me. Let there not be a repetition. The very lifeblood of your organization is at stake. I have attacked copies of my correspondence to and from BK Conrad and Asher196. If you need further information, please advise. I will send this to Asher196 and BKConrad, so they are informed of my complaint. Stan BK: Thank you. However, this has soured me, and I will cure myself of my wikiaholic behavior. I quit. They've achieved their victory, and Wiki will lose my modest contributions. That being said, I think you should look close at what they edited, and come to your own conclusion. They gutted whole articles. This was WIKISTALKING and they went FAR beyond what they complained about. This was search and destroy, pure, simple and unvarnished. It was a clear abuse of power. I will not abide an abuse of power, and will not let this rest without their being brought to justice they are bullies, and this was wrong. I for one would not stand silently and idly by while the Wehrmacht makes the Jews disappear into the railroad cars. Moreover, their actions showed an intent (and attempt) to bully me into silence about their misconduct. It was a cover up. Accountability in this system is important. Those who abuse their powers do not deserve to be trusted to hold the reins. They deserve the severest sanctions, and should be stripped of administrative privileges. What they did here was very destructive of the goals of an organization that depends on the good will and volunteer efforts of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (talk) Stan Coincidentally, Hu12‎ chose this interregnum of completely delete (archive) his user talk. This is after he was unmaking history and deleting my accusations of misconduct, which I put back on his page This is a Watergate style cover up. 7&6=thirt

0

463f36a393b890cc

To the closing Admin I believe that if you read carefully, you will find that there are a great many people and sources who declare water boarding to be torture. I fully accept that this is true: Many, perhaps most think so. I would encourage you also to recognize that there is a notable and significant minority who disagree. And in some cases they have explained reasons for this. In some cases they have not.

0

464505d8d4ac5f88

Blocked You have been blocked indefinitely for intentional impersonation of a known user ( (talk)

0

4645825554d587d0

"::YOU have described, the modus operandi of one self described supported of the Democratic Party , Gamailiel as had years to hone his ""finely tuned kraft"" of bias, steering, and snarky comments, while he wields the ban button to any one he is scared off. His history in this is unquestioned. His Hypocrisy knowns no bounds. Him and his cadra of ""meat puppets"" have long histories of ""Owning"" WP:OWN and abusing of process and power for his (their) own political ends ( plaining stated on his own talk page ""ready to fuck you up old school"". In the long run you will hurt wikipedia and your self, due to the high stakes nature of this game, and the fact that you have no morel or logical ethical leg to stand on. "

1

0

1

0

4650d0c88619e7d7

" Influence and awards Greatiest? That's a little thin, no? Perhaps we can remove this and merge the other part to a different section?Makin'Bacon "

0

4653f6e06d7ff37f

" Reply Great! Nice to see you back. Did you see WP:CELTICS and WP:BOSOX? - Favorite '''''Cookie "

0

46595fb91beb252c

If that's the case, then why don't you just desist from editing the article?

0

4661910b15c5bee5

I know certain people will say this is not relevant, but I have made 41 articles a GA, so I am clearly not the disruptive, bullying and owning person that I am being made out to be. If I was, I'm sure I wouldn't have been able to promote 41 articles. I'm still not even sure how what I have been blocked for even comes into this block, but I won't repeat myself.''}}

0

466244f9486ef480

"Why, exactly, do people find it necessary to put random nonsense on a page? The intent is supposed to be providing information that is useful to the reader. Posting ""hey every body i have a jack russell jhedbejukqrfghukwerfguwe"" does nothing of the sort. "

0

4662b3a67d84ae35

" ashleynn I've watched for a while. Why does your block notice say ""abusing multiple accounts""? "

0

466703a2dfa0a3b7

" See also WP:ANI#Edit war/conflict of interest Talk:British Gazette#Unrelated publication. "

0

466b3f40ad4ab719

How do I add categories to an article? Thanks

0

466c3698d94629c1

Apparently, plagiarism does not bother you, since you revert the material with studying it and then claim that you are in the middle of a project and can't be bothered right now. If you are in the middle of a project, how did you find time to revert my changes well explained cahnges? You collaborate with Tom [NorthShoreman], so I won't be holding my breath to see if you ever get around to correcting the plagiarism and sham citations.74.192.7.135

0

46767a6c9d349a00

You changed it back idiot, I did leave my reasons in the discussion page in case you have not read it. New Mexico campaign is completely wrong. Not allof the battleis in this campaign occurred in New Mexico. You changed that back but you did not bother changing back the campaignbox or the several other articles connected to it. I will be changing it back.

1

0

1

0

1

0

4678a87ab30d0f77

at the set-point speed limit

0

467bb3d06e714a14

my dogs breath smells of contempt look up order of krill

1

0

467f80e22bef8330

" Thank you very much for responding. Please do feel free to ask about this on the talk page of the article. I can tell you, however, that it has been discussed before, and my revert of your edit was based on previous discussion. That should not stop you from discussing this if you want to, but you should know what to expect. Again, thanks for the message in English. — "

0

467fcdd9dd9dc194

Good enough for me. My bad.

0

467ff952dae6a69e

from a page that doesn't exist

0

4693530886ecda4e

" But Leithp is a WikiFascist! All WikiAdmins are as they follow the philosophy of ""Resistance is Futile"""

0

4695f39fe068de05

Fuck the shit out of you, Nil! Learn to use better manners, or you will be banned! Aksai Chin deservedly is Chinese territory for the people living there are TIBETAN, not your motherfucking Hindu scum! Haha, so sad too bad China killed you in 1962! By the way Nil, you must really love anal fucking!

1

0

1

0

1

0

469cbc344d417ca1

You guyz are all just Elf-Masher wannabes ! None of you have contributed one word to the Dog fighting article and none of you even know about Dog Fighting.....Do Any Of You Know Have Any Elves I Can Mash??

0

46a9110acbed9e6a

" Perhaps I'm reading it in a different tone than you are writing it, but with all the emphasis you've added, it's coming off a bit hostile. I've made my position pretty clear. I gave you advice on what areas you needed to work in to appease the regular voters at RFA, for what the current trends are. I am under no obligation to vote with the trend. Like you said, her's is a different situation than yours. If you think her succeeding in this RFA will eventually result in her desysop, then that's your opinion. I don't agree, thus she has my support. (Talk) "

0

46ac553cecb99242

I am simply supporting the consensus, which is to only include nations of the British Isles. As a matter of fact, I think the Germans are a lot closer to us than the French, but someone else has been trying to argue the opposite and at the same time push all sorts of medievalist, aristocratic fantasies.

0

46b2ab821941ed5a

It would probably be helpful if you could find something not WMC-related to do. It's not constructive to make snide, insulting remarks like this one. In general, if you feel that there is an issue with another user's conduct, address it politely and clearly in an appropriate venue. Don't take cheap shots. (talk)

0

46be7baf9a543f16

" Homosexuality and race of course are the subjects to be most avoided on wikipedia, otherwise bear the consequences of people such as your self who are very sensitive of such issues going to an extreme and making the worst possible situation possible out of something that was said. A lot of its comes down to tone, a while no homosexual discussion is really advisable on wikipedia it turns out that the tonw towards myself by the others was clearly more malicious that what I dished out to others and a direct natural human response ot percieved personal attacks on myself. I'm not excusing what I said or did, but I think you are taking it far too literally rather than actually seeing I was wondering why you stick so hard with each other at all costs rather than actually calling you gay. Never mind, hell better be freezing when I return.♦ Dr. Blofeld "

0

46bfb6644f096461

" Ah, so you admit your violation to WP:OWN. And Bunchofgrapes little biased ""support"" (based on... well, we all know what) is simply amusing. But... then, seeing how you expect to be treated like a queen and that whatever you say goes: no. This is not your article. You do not have the rights to decide what is ""trolling"" and all of this bullsh*t. Learn your lesson, wise up, and start respecting the decisions of others. You are not the only person in this world, and you are also not anybody such as Queen Elizabeth, who would certainly rid of your rudeness without argument. I have no interest in enhancing this article any further. Let it weep all that it wants. And enough of the email-is-perfect-let's-sock conversations. I am done with you, I am done with you, I am done with you. This is history. Thank God. — | talk "

0

46c5515a29fd53d7

" ""Liberal conservativism"" seems a good compromise between my source and your claims. ODS, f.e., is considered liberal conservative by the same czech wiki. Hope it fits for you. "

0

46c9cabc9dfacd22

I saw that you have done the work on r-flurbiprofen. Have you seen this or this? It looks like there is a new generic name.

0

46d5cf880820677a

" Collapsed and Closed Sections What's been going on here is people pointing out that legitimate and notable criticism of her knowledge of video games, that Anita does not meet notability standards as no credible sources (nothing even close to a peer reviewed journal) have praised her work, and a bunch of long time editors have said ""No criticism allowed because she awesome! Go away!"" The reason her work will never find its way into a psychology journal is because it is complete BS. There is a huge difference between toys made for boys and toys made for girls because corporations have done extensive market research and design to taste. It has nothing to do with a conspiracy against women that has been successful for thousands of years across every culture known to history. The fact that Anita wants girls to play games made for boys doesn't make her relevant, it makes her a fighter of reality, as well as a hypocrite. She recently expressed her anger at video game makers for including female characters but used a bow on their heads to distinguish them, even though old school graphics left few options, and ignored the fact that modern video games are able to make females distinct in many ways. Yes, bows were used to distinguish females, because women are into accessories. They could have used, I don't know, giant hoop earrings. If Anita is as adamant as she claims, she needs to free her ears of the great patriarchy's brand and shave her head. What about little boys who want to play with dolls and My Little Pony? They get teased much worse than girls who want to play video games made for boys. I guess that's because they're not manly enough, so it's still girls who are being oppressed. The idea that men and women should be treated equally in the workplace is one thing but the idea that men and women don't have fundamentally different tastes, and are the victims of an ancient conspiracy to convince us all that we do, is a bunch of BS that will never be taken seriously by any professional journal. This is why Anita is an irrelevant nobody (and proven liar: ""I love video games."" I'm not a fan of video games"") and doesn't deserve a page beyond the incident where she played the victim and was given a bunch of money. I know, ""go away!""209.89.84.174 "

0

46dc514755dcfcdf

I know this is an old chestnut, but we should only include the Polish-Bolshevik vets who served in 1919, if that's possible to establish. Otherwise it will open the door for loads of early 20s cases. Marian Skwarski is definitely worth another search, because I think his case was most similar to Wycech's. I seem to have added the wrong link there. 212.183.134.210 Captain celery

0

46de67c1c7c74f42

yo should stop reverting my edictions

0

46eaa57054c0af22

Always a pleasure to help new people and catch-up with more experienced ones - thank you for organising it! (talk)

0

46ee192a2d3ba7aa

Karl Möbius Professor, I added a few new sentences to the Wikipedia article on Karl Möbius. While the article addressed Möbius's research on oyster beds, it did not include where or why the research was conducted. I wrote that Möbius was commissioned by the Prussian Ministry of Agricultural Affairs to research the natural oyster beds and their profitability in the Bay of Kiel. I also included a reference to Michael Allaby's book Ecology: Plants, Animals, and the Environment. -Aidan

0