Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
5719cf7ffddb8e18
It would not have to be extended if you knew how to edit? Enjoy your power trip. An editor who can't fucking edit what a joke. Editing me!! HA!
1
0
0
0
0
0
571aa17ef3e0e7f6
Thank you for your help. The main issue has still been avoided, repeatedly. Why am I accused of harrassment and blocked? No reasons or examples were ever given and withthe number of responders it would appear to be just gaming of the Wikipedia system due to hatred of IPs by a certain few. 200.78.138.53
0
0
0
0
0
0
571b6871bea92bfc
Thank you robot. At least you're reasonable and like me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
571b7305218a37d7
"Hello, 梁智前, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Chinese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! 您好，梁智前。歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科。雖然我們隨時歡迎你在英文版維基百科編輯，但是你這次執筆所使用的英文並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準。若是你們不介意的話，你們可以在中文版維基百科編輯。感謝你們參加維基百科。 talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
571e0457cfa82ad5
I really wish someone else cared about this game -
0
0
0
0
0
0
572026ba65e3d9a1
Vandalism and false slanderous and malicious accusations Please stop deliberately introducing incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
572e81f331427e2a
POV issue This article does not tell about the laws that require boards of directors, typical officers on a board, typical educations, experiences, contacts, etc. of board members. There is also nothing about the history of the concept of boards of directors. Almost the entire article is devoted to pointing out the alleged shortcomings of boards, and none of the statements have sources to verify them. I'm tagging this article as POV until these issues are resolved.
0
0
0
0
0
0
573506aac6da688c
I just want to add that Chavo Guerrero eats Doodie. With JBL
0
0
0
0
0
0
573f16d5976b8152
I can't believe she is 48 years old... SOURCE?!
0
0
0
0
0
0
573f80324d6e4bd6
Ringleader Exposed! The ringleader of the allopathy-promo attacks has been today!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
5742778f7beda5f2
Photo Why not add a photo of Lefter, our legendary player. I will also tell fellow Turkish WP users to add a National Team photo.
0
0
0
0
0
0
574357621af2ba59
" ""Six one way, half a dozen the other""... if you are a sock of an indefinitely banned user, then you are a sock of an indefinitely banned user. Doesn't matter which one, as per the blocking policy, you are disallowed from creating other accounts. If it makes you feel better, I have edited your block rationale to say you are a sockpuppet of t/c "
0
0
0
0
0
0
5743beac56eb2970
" Welcome to Wikipedia Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site. If you need help see: Help contents - the main help page. Cheatsheet - a listing of the main editing commands. Here are a few more good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Category:WelcomeBotResearch We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want date stamp; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Feneris I have added a ""{{prod}}"" template to the article Feneris, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
574b2f311973b003
" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threatsNEW
0
0
0
0
0
0
5754bc22d12f3565
Image Copyright Hey, you commented me earlier about a copyright on a picture of a Sting book. Just thought I'd let you know that I do have permission from the publisher and the author specifically to use images for their books. I was asked by the author themselves to do this - SeanyakaRalphy
0
0
0
0
0
0
57566f5edad17535
" Reincarnation research Please stop removing valid WP:RS from this article. You have done this twice in the last 10 minutes. Please restore the last reference you have removed, and take any concerns you have to the talk page. Removing sourced, valid, material that is not a copyvio is WP:DISRUPTIVE. chat "
0
0
0
0
0
0
575fb68934f4bbc6
Thank you for the reply. Your rating of Start implies that this article has just started and needs (in your opinion) much work to improve. Please explain. I am not aware of your checklist and your list of specific shortcomings of the article. Please be specific about the areas that you believe need work - - - better yet, please provide constructive edits for others to consider.
0
0
0
0
0
0
57611d347a4ca287
Hello . It's curious. I thought you might just be a bit paranoid so I checked. made about 33 edits on WP beginning on 10 April 2005 and ending 6 June 2005. With the exception of two edits regarding Pound sterling articles and a few edits to his own User page every other edit was only to the Jehovah's Witnesses page and its Talk page. User began editing on 10 June 2005. 21 of 22 edits are to the Jehovah's Witnesses page or its Talk page. You were right! That guy's out of control!!! 8 July 2005 07:00 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
5761f621a1e95c3a
" When asked ""Are you an agnostic or an atheist?"", Russell replied: Agnostic, of course. Atheists are like Christians: That is, both dogmatically mantain that we can know whether or not there is a God. The Christian holds that God does exist; the atheist holds that God does not. But the agnostic knows that we simply do not possess sufficient grounds either to affirm or deny the existennce of a supreme being. So I believe that although the existence of God is not impossible, it is improbable. Quite improbable. A more clarifying answer, as mentioned above, can be found in Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic? (1947), where Russell states: As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think that I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because, when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods. Regards, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
576652996ad2bc0b
, give it the necessary privileges
0
0
0
0
0
0
5766a0c7625891d1
Thanks for helping again. For the moment I selected some Kagel pieces for the article - very subjectively so for interesting title or instrumentation, easy translation - and transferred them from the sandbox to the article, looking forward for a more scholarly selection by you - or you know someone else who might know. Some films and Hörspiele should certainly be included as his specialty, and I wonder if his books were translated? In progress
0
0
0
0
0
0
576b14e5e9d8febb
This page has been edited. Republican jacobite (a known UVF sympathizer) should not re-edit this page, as I will keep re-editing it since the edits have been sourced properly.
0
0
0
0
0
0
576b56eb089b1f74
Visit http://www.WebNoeSys.com Mail us at [email protected], [email protected]
0
0
0
0
0
0
576bbe392cbd1128
Sure it does. If it is merely a recitation of a bad source, it is not better than the bad source. Or are you of the opinion that a lie can come closer to the truth by repeating it? 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC
0
0
0
0
0
0
576d4e37f45c94e2
" February 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the improvements you have made to Shadow Circus. The article is certainly better. I would urge you to continue to work on it though, because its claim to notability (via Zach Tenorio) is still weak. It appears that Tenorio has played onstage with some well known artists, but the references I was able to find via Google show he was one of several people who played briefly onstage on one occasion. This really doesn't meet the ""Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable"" criteria of WP:BAND since he was never a member of those other bands in the sense meant by our guideline. Since that's the only notability criteria that the article currently depends on, its a pretty thin justification for the article. I will keep an eye on the article, and I hope you can find better sources for it and improve the case for Shadow Circus being notable. If you can't its likely that I or another editor will nominate it for discussion as an article for deletion and I fear in its current state it may not be kept. Good luck, 18:10, 8"
0
0
0
0
0
0
5772f3574c27db66
" Once you understand that most of the false claims from Debian and it's sockpuppets are based on attempts to reverse the timeline (in order to confuse cause and reaction) it is easy to look for hints that prove claims from Debian as false. You also need to know that there is absolutely no evidence for the claims from Debian. Repeating a false claim thousands of times does not make it correct, but Debian just uses copies of their false claims to ""proove"" their claims. So what remains? The only provable facts are that Debian started to attack cdrtools in spring 2004 and that Debian at the same time stopped distributing the original cdrtools in favor of their own defective fork from spring 2004 that was later reamed (on my instructions) in autumn 2006. No license problem was ever proven. Most Linux distros ship cdrtools. The larger distros even asked their lawyers for an OK that of course was given. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
577bfb8d71e549e9
The ironic thing is that his first employment was with insurance companies!
0
0
0
0
0
0
577e89714508e10e
]] and have not been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please do not use the sandbox. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
5780f137ce3bc27c
" Words beginning with ""nh"" Nhoque (""gnocchi"") is one example. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
5782da8a3ba06128
The Last Paragraph in the intro I'm not sure its point in being there. Could somebody put it in a more useful place- or at least explain it better?
0
0
0
0
0
0
57853db78d7cbbfe
" Actually I haven't...but I am still going to watch that video. I always figured out the post-credit scenes of Marvel movies before I have seen it so it's no big deal to me. I would say that it's probably got a better Peter Parker but I am not sure on the movie being better. I would say it's got enough difference on the movie to be entertaining. All the same old is Parker gets bullied by Flash (even though the bully seems more fleshed out), Peter gets bitten and Uncle Ben dies. That had to be in there anyways. If so it would have been unfaithful to the comics origin. 777 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
578bbe031d96d332
NCAA Basketball Articles referencing NCAA Division I Regular Season Championships: Tar Heels Recharge Just in Time N.C.A.A. TOURNAMENT; N.I.T. Sets Its Field of 32 Temple Brings Louisville's Roll to a Halt Already on Shaky Ground, Maryland Stumbles Again NY Times - Basketball; Well-Matched Teams To Square Off in East
0
0
0
0
0
0
578fdeee56dad6bd
Jane Zhang I'm adding some more comments now.  Monoxide
0
0
0
0
0
0
57998a823bfa06aa
Does Pearlman speak French? Perhaps the article should mention that Pearlman speaks French, if he does, or explain how he could play One in the Jeunet/Caro movie La cité des enfants perdus if he doesn't (One rarely says more than ten words in any given scene of the movie, so it probably wouldn't be impossible even if Pearlman only speaks a few words of French). -
0
0
0
0
0
0
579b2d65520040c1
are you a social life failure? Why you so care about my talk page? I can do with it what I want unless there's no mat. Take a break and go relax to Siberia, kid. 95.68.45.171
1
0
0
0
0
0
57a21ec9f54fae85
Go fuk your Momma, Rancie!
1
0
1
0
1
0
57a6f8ffd3fc0fca
" hey buddy, hey buddy, guess what? ""I"" dont care realy what ""your"" excuse is, and couldn't care less what Roaringflamer says, but you are obviously obsessed with redirects. If there is anybody that should be banned, its you for vandalism and disruption so there"
1
0
0
0
0
0
57a81ab7d181e118
The article David Dux Duke has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
57b671a7a4f66138
" The statements on Zac Efron are a valid inclusion in this article. It is sourced by two reliable sources, meeting WP:V. A quick look at Google news shows that several other sources have also already picked this up. An ""official statement"" from Disney is completely unnecessary.  (talk · contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57b6cd91c50f143f
" I think all statements I've referred to are currently unreferenced anyway, but we can interpret the usage is various ways without a reference in some cases. Reference hunting is a debilitating sport and honestly, it's not needed. Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57bfdea71b860390
" Moved Timeline This is a timeline of jewellery production from the first uses of metal in history to the Renaissance. 7000 BC - Uses of copper in Anatolia, Iran and Eastern Europe. 5000 BC - Uses of copper in Egypt. 4000 BC - Smelting technology for copper in Egypt and Iran. 3450 BC - Use of natural zinc/copper alloy in Egypt. 3500 BC - Gold makes an appearance in Egyptian jewellery. 3000 BC - Egypt and Iran makeing simple hammered iron beads 3000 BC - The Middle East employ semi-mass-production 2000 BC - First signs of the swagging technique 2600 BC - Beaded wires began to be used. 2500 BC - Egyptians using copper/lead alloys. 2500 BC - True iron production technology in Near East. 2500 BC - The intentional addition of silver and copper to gold. 2500 BC - Gold wires are characterised by seam lines that follow a spiral path along the wire. 2000 BC - Use of patterned punches 1500 BC - Earplugs and earrings become popular in Egypt. 1400 BC - Egypt Amarna period, using resin and mud for repoussé backing. 1400 BC - Deliberate addition of zinc to copper in Canaan. 1400 BC - Philistines have iron. 1400 BC - Very copper rich gold alloys popular in Egypt. 1000 BC - Persian sheet bronze work 0.05mm thick. 1000 BC - The start of true engraving. 900 BC - The Greeks have iron. 700 BC - World's oldest coinage in Lydia. 575 BC - In Greece, jewellery is still very rare. 500 BC - Hafted hammers were being used in some parts. 500 BC - Iron in use in the British Isles 400 BC - Greeks using Beeswax for filler in repoussé. 350 BC - Use of combined punches and dies of bronze. 325 BC - Animal or human-headed hoop earrings were popular. 300 BC - Diadems are first seen. 300 BC - Red Coral popular in Celtic jewellery. AD 50 - Start of the Roman period, where addition of silver to gold becomes almost unknown. AD 100 - Sulphur fills hollow gold items throughout the Roman Empire. AD 150 - Tin rings found in Nubia AD 300 - Lead becomes more common in places. AD 400 - Pewter jewellery is made. AD 400 - A shale die is found on Great Britain. AD 1500 - The Renaissance AD 1900 - Art Nouveau jewellery Famous jewellers Elias Akaoui founder of Akaoui stores in Cairo, Egypt. Paolo Bulgari Chairman of Bulgari. Pierre Cartier Co-founder of Cartier SA Peter Carl Fabergé Russian jeweller best known for the fabulous Fabergé eggs Ian Harris Jewellery expert to the BBC's Antiques Roadshow, Director of N. Bloom & Son Scott Kay Founder of Scott Kay Inc., a bridal jewelry company. Kenneth Jay Lane founder of Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. Robert Lee Morris influential in the jewelry-as-art movement Charles Lewis Tiffany founder of Tiffany & Co.. Sotirios Voulgaris founder of Bulgari. Sound of jewellery The sound of jewellery has played an enermous part in many stories, poems, and religious literature (more details and sources to come). Different jewellery creates different sounds, ie plastic bangles create a high pitched clink sound, while others such as baxelite produce a ""clunck"" sound. Knowing how a particular piece of jewellery sounds can help someone identify whether or not a piece of jewellery is fake. Indeed people have written about the sound of ""fake gold"", and jewel makers such as Sharon Alouf, a famous jeweler have praised the high frequency pitched noise of gold bangles(most likely real gold she is wearing). To this day, the jeweler claims, ""the sound of bangles clinking together is very soothing to me. It always reminds me of motherhood.""Alouf is even partial to particular tones. ""Gold produces my favorite sound,"" she says, ""the pitch is higher and clearer, which I find energizing."" I placed this here until my editing of the article is complete, but I think the above stuff is obsolete, so it could stay here. Opinions?... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57c12564ebfb8add
]] again. We don't use Mr, Mrs, Ms, or Miss in infoboxes unless the gender is not obvious. See WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#IB. Your change of the teacher ratio is not sourced, and you changed my sourced number without changing the valid, cited ref. You cannot change a properly cited piece of information and claim that it came from the same reference. If you have a different, better source, then use it. Otherwise leave the number alone. Furthermore, you should be using valid edit summaries. You claimed that many of your edits were typo corrections when they were clearly not.
0
0
0
0
0
0
57c84a3f73ef7537
hunk YOU'VE BEEN HIT BY THE BEAUTIFUL truck ONCE YOU'VE BEEN HIT, YOU HAVE TO HIT 8 Beautiful People IF YOU GET HIT AGAIN YOU'LL KNOW YOU'RE REALLY BEAUTIFUL! IF YOU BRAKE THE CHAIN, YOU'LL BE CURSED WITH UGLYNESS FOR 10 YEARS SO PASS IT HIT WHO EVER YOU THINK IS BEAUTIFUL!
1
0
0
0
0
0
57cb573a73e42231
Toyota have withdrawn the car. Dead issue.
0
0
0
0
0
0
57d075b0442ccb95
" Semi-pro football discussions need feedback Hello! You have participated in WP:AFD disucssions involving semi-pro football teams in the past. The following two AFD discussions could use additional weigh-in as they appear to be stuck in ""relisting"" mode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaboard Football League Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeastern Football Alliance I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion. If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57d199a93312f597
May 2012 (UTC) User:GFHandel is clearly correct here. DuLithgow’s coming in and deciding that this CAD editor is that is not notable, as was clearly way off base. User:Ryan Vesey made this uncanny and pithy edit summary when he “millions of google search results, take it to AFD if you wish”. Thus, Users , , and just aren’t in agreement here. Moreover, Duncan’s , over the last few days to delete all manner of CAD programs from this list is clearly without consensus and needs a clear consensus when the edits aren’t copyediting but are instead massive use of the [delete] key. Editors are all here on en.Wikipedia to build the project. The way things are done here are the product of years of consensus building and an evolution of processes. Moreover, the editors active on the CAD-related articles tend to have extensive experience with the subject matter. It is clear that the evolved intention of the list of CAD editors is to make it an inclusive and comprehensive list that readers can use as an authoritative source for what programs have been developed over the years. Before deleting scores of man-hours of material that other editors have slaved over, there must be a clear consensus here on this talk page for the material’s removal. Since there is clearly no consensus for these latest edits throughout the project and here on this list, to the previous consensus view. Please bear in mind that consensus can change. But we can not have consensus established by an editor testing the waters as to what content can merely be deleted from the project; clearly established consensus via discussion must occur here in advance of such moves. 17:05, 14
0
0
0
0
0
0
57d4e229ed1dcb7a
hello is also in other languages but in english it means hi nice to see you....76.25.171.105
0
0
0
0
0
0
57e3597f10641e26
" Username Hi. Please remember to follow the advice two sections above. Ideally, you should not be editing after notices like that, if they are accurate. Remember that English Wikipedia contributors can not edit on behalf of companies. All edits must be personal. Have a good one. · talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57e9bcbcf1147693
REDIRECT User talk:Tony Tan 98
0
0
0
0
0
0
57f09b70ce8c022a
on the suggested merger with 'wipe' This is a higher level, more inclusive, rubric than wipe and so there should not be a merger. Especially in that wipe is usually used in connection only with read/write media and, in particular, magnetic media such as hard drives. Comments from others?
0
0
0
0
0
0
57f1f020b9294c93
"This article meets GA criteria. It will need other sources in order to be considered for A-level or FA review. (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
57f203476a63ec9b
lol, you can take a joke standing up! His breasts are just so cuddly aren't they? Just like a large womans when your stuck in a barn some night and its freezing outside... Imagine cuddling up to them! 83.71.9.119
1
0
0
0
0
0
57fab21e2b5a6edb
fuckoff fuckoff i don't want self promoting faggots shitting up wikipedia, if there's a fucking ban on vanity pages for people there should be one on vanity pages for shitty bands nobody will ever care about
1
1
1
0
1
0
57fcb0caaa755061
" Third Reich related advice PA - I just wanted to make a suggestion to you for dealing with the Third Reich articles you've shown an interest in. I happen to think there's some value (per NPOV) in what you're trying to add, but these articles need better sourcing and more tact than other articles, and you have been using such to date. Remember, there are still a lot of people in the world with hair-triggers on the subject of Naziism, and any unreasonableness tends to magnify exponentially. There are decent secondary sources for what you are trying to say, so give up the confrontational language, stick closely to facts and sources, and try to make reasoned arguments as best you can. If you can keep things calm on the talk page you'll be able to make fruitful additions to the article. Ludwigs2 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
5803aecdcd7385c8
. Talk to you doc. about upping your dose ot switching to an anti-psychotic, it sounds like you need all the help you can get
0
0
0
0
0
0
58042811a78659c7
I've created a discussion section on [[the talk page relevant guideline. I suggest interested parties contribute at that location and we'll try to reach a consensus there. (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
580623107392ce6f
" I believe it's rolling out slowly. I had an option in my preferences for it but some people do not and instead have both the visual editor and a new button that says ""edit source."" Additionally, it can be disabled completely under the Gadgets tab in preferences. Btw, did you do a hard refresh? talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58092fb6980aba95
(Afterwriting - well perhaps you would like to keep off my Talk page - you really seem to have got it in for me haven't you? Seems strange that you can carry on abusing me about how Wiki works - what if were to say your knowledge of the topics in hand doesn't seem to be proficient? This unfortunately is a great downfall of Wikipedia - content over MOS... regarding User talk:Qexigator's request & in the circumstances I suggest viewing www.museumstjohn.org.uk If this block is not overturned I shall know where I stand & will bid you all farewell (sadly but as a matter of principle, why put up with such treatment by three MOS rottweilers and were Admin to look properly into the matter it would be clear who is harassing (& it is not me I can assure you - unless MOS mistakes are regarded as harassment?). Ciao M don't know and on to more substantive
0
0
0
0
0
0
580a3fa976ccba3f
Rather than just talking about Wikipedia's guidelines and all, please stick on to the facts or at least do some research before vandalizing a certain ethnic group's identity that has been existing for thousands of years. I propose this change because it is true. Kindly tell me what proof do you want before preposterously vandalizing this content.
0
0
0
0
0
0
5812e364ef60484c
However the one revert restriction prevents me from doing so.
0
0
0
0
0
0
581378775397bc55
The History Channel is wrong. Please see Talk:Lethal injection#1982 vs 1983 and the sources given that correctly state that it happened in 1982. In particular see the New York Times article about the execution from December 7, 1982. ∴Hello
0
0
0
0
0
0
5817e5fc7922ca95
I think this sick man should be put to death ...but that's just my opinion.
1
0
0
0
0
0
58242901ff186cb9
By adding the {{mergeto|PAGENAME}} (in this case, {{mergeto|DeviantART}}), it lists the article as a candidate to be merged. At that point, the administrators and those who work on WikiProjects that deal with merges will take care of the rest, I believe. If you want to know more about the merging process, you could check out this reference page. {Talk}
0
0
0
0
0
0
582a2b0b37dbcfa3
Niggerpuppets Please don't trivialise meatism, specism or make presumptions of others ethinicity and please don't make personal attacks. Thank you. How silly do you want this thing to become? We are certainly into Panto season here [ ... oh, yes we are ... oh, no we are not! ] Actually, the analogy is a very good one as the user Vigger pointed out. Do you think some troll calling vegans Mr Meatpuppet is not a personal attack?
0
0
1
0
1
1
582c5d6a96357361
Please support Hi. I'm wondering if you could lend support to a proposal for a Stub-sorting Barnstar. The page is here. Have a good day ) No such listing. I guess I'm a bit too late. ; Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited.
0
0
0
0
0
0
583277d0c0adc4e3
Scope needed There may be a need to split this off into various outlines. This is mostly political and/or military history at the moment, so perhaps it should be retitled. There's some content on arts and culture in Western civilization, that could be a separate outline. Just speculating, since there could eventually be more material added to the outline as it stands, than would be manageable to work with. I also notice that economic history is very neglected in the current outline, that might be more useful to readers if it is a standalone outline. Just what I'm thinking, anyway. Anyone else have any thoughts?
0
0
0
0
0
0
58376ed385438a48
Harrassment Please stop hounding me and posting untrue accusations about me. I have NEVER vandalized a page in my entire life and I NEVER WILL. If you would have read my profile you would have seen I am a member of WP:CVU. Please WP:AGF instead of making libelous accusations like those again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
583ad18500180a07
I had assumed that the endorsements both had to come from users other than the one who filed the complaint. As for needing to do more for the rfc to be considered filed. I used that template they provided what more do they want? Thanks for notifying me of these things. As for this RfC being a good idea. Well, the run up to mediation did not change Dicklyon's behavior one iota. I also do not think it likely that DarlieB will agree to mediation in the frist place. I also have no real faith in mediation for this problem, not at this point. I don't think there is a point in engaging in a mediated settlement with Dicklyon. He will just aborogate it when it suits him. I'll try to get these little formalities right. So far I have read that page and did what I understood I was supposed to do. Perhaps this processs needs simplification.
0
0
0
0
0
0
583b207e4ffd5177
|class=stub |importance=
0
0
0
0
0
0
583b8d0cac1f65a8
The Bernanke shows NO SIGN of higher IQ as his actions csaused the present global crisis. /s/ high ee see lassie, ethi opia 69.121.221.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
583c363c0006ff07
" It's not, but the use of ""Brazilian British people"" in the text is. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
583ee05ce0e73266
Incidentally, you were extremely concise and better at it than I. Perhaps I wont even do the objections anymore. I am not so gifted in terse tact. I do though, mean to protect other editors by exposing the meanspirited nature of these malcontents as to the welfare of the article. One is trying to shift the focus onto me, as though I am Korismo/ICarrier. I did read most of his posts, but he's actually a newcomer to the article and I am not. I will not explain myself further, just know that a checkuser is useless. Go ahead anyways and break these twinks' hearts. 24.255.11.149
0
0
0
0
0
0
5846607ab3e8db69
" is known as the al'Buraq wall to Muslims. I do not doubt in any way that is is known by this name by many Muslims, particularly some Palestinian and Jordanian Muslims. However, from everything that I've read, the name is of rather recent provenance, and was never known as such among Muslims until the foundation of modern Israel. If memory serves, it didn't really have any circulation until the last two decades or so. from the obscure claims of Mujir al'Din that the Buraq was left there when Mohammad ascended to paradise, which itself is a legend derived from Sahih al'Bukhari, the provenance of the hadith itself being regarded by some as an addition of a later editor; that's of little relevance here, though. I see this has been mentioned on the talk page already in passing, and I don't advocate any necessity of removing it. However, the attribution itself is sixteenth century, and actual naming of it as the ""al'Buraq wall"" is incredibly recent. I think we should at the very least clarify this, add another source aside from an obviously politically motivated fatwa for the name, and perhaps move it somewhere besides the lead so we can elaborate on all of this. I just skimmed it, but I'm not even sure the fatwa actually names it as such aside from the title (nevermind, it does). For all I know, it may itself be the origin of the name, with this article helping to disseminate it. Since this, like every Jerusalem-related article, is contentious, I thought it best to get some discussion before I did anything. Yes, its a point of contention. See above, it is discussed both in the ""Lead"" subsection of the ""POV Issues"" section and in the ""Rashid Khalidi"" section. Jordanian occupation 1948–1967 I was wondering, from whom did the Jordanian capture the old city of Al-Quds and the wall? and why was the Jordanian rule over it considered occupation, while Israeli rule is considered sovereignty? I don't find this neutral? This should be changed. The answer is in the article. It is referred to as the Jordanian Occupation, because their annexation of the site was not internationally recognised, hence occupation. And while Israel's presence is also not recognised, (the last UN resolution on the matter calls for Jerusalem to be internationalised), in reality, Israel excercises its sovreignty over the site. As this matter is disputed, I did want to add a section on the current legal status of the wall and suggestions mooted during peace negotiations relating to future ownership of the site, but I could not find any good sources. Jordan exercised its sovereignty over the wall for the period they controlled it, i think both should be changed to sovereignty or occupation. The Israeli rule is not internationally recognised either and if I'm not incorrect then the Western wall and old city were part of the West bank. Which is under occupation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.16.207 Jerusalem is viewed differently from the West Bank. See Positions on Jerusalem and Occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem by Jordan. This subject matter is so extensive and there are so many diverse ""postions"" on the subject, I am not really qualified to determine the correct descriptions. But for the sake of neutrality, I believe Yamanam does have a valid point. Even though the artricle on Jordan's rule calls it occupation, I suggest changing both to ""rule"" which would hopefuly solve the problem. Yes i belive that could be an acceptable compromise. i would prefer it if you did it as edits by account members are more respectable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.16.207 I will. But why not become an editor yourself? It only takes a second! Catholic bishops I'm not sure, but maybe the article could report about the famous incident that
0
0
0
0
0
0
58501fd317937153
now i will verge on a personal attack by saying that in the opinion of some my bolck could be seen as a face saving move by an admin to show that a comment they made is not stupid. and to ficherqueen if you read my page you will see i am 13, is that young enough
0
0
0
0
0
0
5853392abd8d6c61
I disagree with your reasoning. Placing the party in a category is an editorial decision, not a research decision, and should only be made if the issue is beyond dispute. The article itself, in Citizens Electoral Council#Platform, would appear to contradict the category. If there is a published opinion that says the party is right wing, it should be included in the body of the article. But even if someone strongly desires to categorize the party as right wing, it should not be done if there is any doubt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
585548f89ac76a6b
" - instead of an abstraction, can you articulate just what I said that constitutes 'harassing' per the standard and plain use of the word 'harassing'? To be a better ""Wikipedian"" . "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58563dd07a2c030b
Clare Potter thanks The image is great, and I had a look at your edits - really good. I'll come back to the references you inserted and re-work them to fit into the format of the other references within the article, but wanted to say thank you. Do you have a special interest in American fashion history? Thanks for the compliment, I have an interest in topics related to New Jersey (among many others), think that images almost always enhance an article, and try to be thorough in researching topics I choose to edit. Often, I have personal experience that enables me to find sources readily or contacts for photographs and relevant materials.
0
0
0
0
0
0
5857c6f363d738ba
Email Why does your 'email me' link above point to wikihermit?
0
0
0
0
0
0
5857fff17fa84b38
ShivYog Foundation Hi there, I noticed you recently deleted ShivYog Foundation under G11. However, I as author had deleted and re-written most of the article after the deletion notice and contested deletion. Also, there was a Note to Administrators to check the Talk page, which had several notes contesting speedy deletion, but probably they were not noticed. I would request you to take note of them, and Undo the deletion. You may surely add Advert warnings on top and You may delete any text found clearly promotional but preferably not delete the whole page, which is also the preferred Wiki guideline. There are many similar pages about Indian spiritual organizations with Advert warnings such as Art of Living Foundation Isha Foundation This article falls in similar category , hence should be treated similarly, that is allowed to exist with Advert warnings. Again, I would request you to undo the deletion and I assure you to co-operate 100% for making the article encyclopedic and non-promotional. Thanks for your time,
0
0
0
0
0
0
58653159892d3946
You're quite welcome.
0
0
0
0
0
0
586cce763d6ee7b7
Jews for Jesus Some Jews love Jesus in a way that can't be fully described with words... you know, in their anus.
0
0
1
0
0
1
586ed039a204e469
On the scales that you’re talking about — fewer than a hundred unique sites put together (15 vs. 69 — a ratio of 1:4½, not 1:6), both forms are so rare as to make such comparisons almost irrelevant. For this hypothetical reader who wouldn’t be able to figure out what ecumenopoleis means from the context, it is given as a plural form at the beginning of the article. It is patronising in the extreme to assume that using the etymologically correct plural will cause such difficulties — particularly as all readers need do if they are confused is open the ecumenopoleis article in a new tab / window to be told what it means in the first sentence. The last remaining argument is æsthetic — it is undeniable that a ending sounds a lot better, and is far easier to say, than a ending.
0
0
0
0
0
0
5882ba6bc1a9ef83
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 19:17, 18 February 2011"
0
0
0
0
0
0
5884f833bf4558d5
Good Zoey idea; I also make additional minor improvements. This is a well-done article now; I see no real problems with it. I hope an editor here considers taking it to WP:GA. Cheers.
0
0
0
0
0
0
588a6837bafa6318
Currently, the amount of constructive edits are outweighing the rubbish. 212.219.59.241
0
0
0
0
0
0
588dc710fe713a8d
Motherfucked you PORKI muslim, what changes have you made at 1971 main section was useless, the defeat of PORKI MUSLIMS AND 15,000 MOSLEM WOMEN BEING RAPED BY HINDU-SIKH soldiers IN RANCHI(INDIA) JAIL seems to have made you mad.
1
0
1
0
1
1
58971242b93d59b2
Slp1, there are millions of articles on Wikipedia which are chronologically not in order or are incomplete. Wikipedia develops with more and more information that people add-in with time. The information about the Warrant issued against Baburam and 14 others is factually correct and well sourced and IS A FACT. The wordings on the article now reflect exactly what the articles say. What happened before and after, is to be added by me and by different wikipedians as and when more information is available. Wikipedia is a continuing work and it is not a complete encylopedia on any given day. It keeps changing and hopefully it keeps changing with the factually correct information. If your argument was to be taken that - every event of Baburam's life has to be put in and then only this point about 'issuance of warrant' against him is to be put in then, you and everyone needs to do this on each and every article of Wikipedia. No article on wikipedia is to be published until and unless it is FULLY COMPLETE. This is not what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is a continued WORK IN ACTION. This is not a valid argument that you put in.
0
0
0
0
0
0
589a6310e3f3c088
Thanks for getting back to me. Could you explain to me what a diff is and how to use it? Thanks
0
0
0
0
0
0
589b42f91b5fc23d
It could all be coincidence, I guess, but see and Talk:Clan Akins and Talk:Akins.
0
0
0
0
0
0
589df6c74d3811a3
Considering it's not complete bollocks, no to both.
0
0
0
0
0
0
589ff490757017de
" Steven Colbert Why can't this guy knock it off. This page was just fine until he opened his big mouth. He has given the wikiadministrators a lot of greif. What's his problem? Because it's funny. God forbid people should cause you grief by opening their big mouths. You should complain about that to an authority figure. It's a fact that people get paid to write biased things on wikipedia, and the content can be bought. If you believe wikipedia is an encyclopedia, with good information and other good things, then he's right, reality is a commodity. Wikipedia told me so, and I believe what I read on wikipedia. vandalism does not make things better. So how many people with the attitude that ""reality is a commodity"" does it take before it's reality? I have peer reviewed the idea that ""reality is a commodity"" and I agree. In fact, I've decided to pick it up! I love this stuff. Fred pays Jim to lob a brick thorough a shopkeeper's window. Who gets the blame? the shopkeeper! I see what you did there. But there's more backstory to that shopkeeper than meets the eye. So there's this shopkeeper, right? And this shopkeeper, he has a shop that doesn't exactly sell anything. He just stands in his shop all day, and gives people answers to whatever they want to know. Now people start noticing this shopkeeper, and they feed the shopkeeper information to answer these questions as well as asking them things they need to know. It becomes a tightly knitted community. Things go well, until people start to unquestioningly believe what the shopkeeper has to offer. These people here, they forget that people like them are the ones feeding him information, and that whoever fed the shopkeeper this information might be just as clueless as they are. But they keep asking, and the shopkeeper keeps telling. Then Fred here comes along, and notices this from an outside perspective. He notices the fundamental flaw in that the advice people are getting from the shopkeeper is just as flawed as the people who told the shopkeeper the information in the first place. So Fred goes up to these people and points this out to them, but nobody seems to care. They're all happy as can be, asking their shopkeeper whatever they need to know and blindly believing what he has to offer. Some of them even retaliate against Fred for disrupting their bubble of ignorance. Fred knows there's nothing that he, Fred, can do to stop this situation. But Fred here, he knows that if something isn't done, people will continue to flock to the shopkeeper like cancer patients to the messiah. And Fred knows guys. And these guys, well, they just happen to own a few bricks. So Fred calls up Jim, slips him some money, and Jim lobs a brick through the shopkeepers window. Of course in this instance, the shopkeeper is Wikipedia. The shopkeeper's devout followers are people who use the Wiki religiously. Fred is Steven Colbert, Jim is anyone willing to follow Steven, and bricks are the messages of those willing people who think that that anyone who uses the wiki religiously, and is willing to attack somebody for calling them on it, should take a step back and look at things in perspective. So the shopkeeper had it coming. a Steven Colbert is funy and he is only useing he's First Amendment right to Freedom of speech 2 is the Reality article ever going to be unlocked "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58a8500022bdab02
Anti-Americanism Thank you for testing out Wikipedia. Please be advised that material added must be properly sourced and correctly formatted. Major changes to articles should be discussed on their talk pages. You can check out WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:MOS for more details.
0
0
0
0
0
0
58b4abdb81556ea5
TG US S5 v S4 Stop changing the season 4 episodes to season 5. The official History and BBC webpages show that season 5 of Top Gear USA has yet to air. I don't care if any other little websites think it's season 5 or even, in fact, if the productions codes indicate they are part of season 5. They are not. If History - the makers of the bloody show - say it's season 4 then it is season 4. No ifs or buts. It is season 4. Please stop changing it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
58ba2e9ba617a005
" Why does that make them non-notable and not ""important""? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58baedaaab58c976
" Updated thanks! Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58bf3862a550a613
" Not sure what you are getting at here or the point your at attempting to make. (???) Hand loaders/ reloaders do not look at SAAMI/CIP when they create their own ammunition. While I do not speak German, I can read and comprehend articles. Note I have in the past used German articles as references... if that is what you mean. I am still working on the article and remains incomplete. However, one does not look at an individual's reloaded data and give it credence from a Wikipedia standpoint. Factory manufactured ammunition should only be listed for illustrative purposes and for good reason, they respect a standard which is safe in a vast majority of caliber specific firearms. Conversely, if no standard is maintained for a given cartridge then data from reloading manuals should suffice. I am well aware that .325 WSM components are available in Europe, a cursory check on component sellers websites evidence this. BGO... However, I am certain that those reloading are not dragging pressure measuring instrumentation and pressure testing their ammunition against SAAMI or CIP standards. Not sure what is being alluded to in the S&B; ""looks like... FMJ"" but they do not manufacture 325 WSM ammo. It is certain that the 325 WSM will become another also ran cartridge. Certainly, rifle trends show that much. This was an 8mm cartridge designed from the US and Canadian markets and was a commercial flop from the beginning. But what does that have to do with anything in the end, really. It is still a cartridge and should be treated in an objective manner on the Wiki - just like any other article. Yes the 8mm IS is established in Europe, and the 8mm RWS much less so but is hanging on, the 8 Rem Mag is dead and almost buried and .325 has both feet firmly planted in the the grave. So what... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58c3ada36d2b7077
I agree with Globe. He has my support.
0
0
0
0
0
0
58ca19aba640fe5d
" So, politely I ask an honest administrator to remove this sensless block. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
58d1b0a9487d3c22
Juan Mann's website http://www.juanmann.com It looks like the original Juan Mann is back, this site should be included as it seems a relevant resource.
0
0
0
0
0
0
58d27e78f99f0cf5
In exactly what way is that a summary?
0
0
0
0
0
0