tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	threat int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
5a49af810b1e1fe5	I have posted this edit war to AN/I. Please stop the edit war or it will be stopped for you. And don't forget WP:3RR. ÷ talk	0	0	0	0	0
5a4dbc100baec2d9	I like that daft very much, looks far better. I welcome this format to the walmart entry. Maybe with this Rebuild we can purge some of the POV that are very much built right into the entry after years of POV being inserted as facts.The Ace!	0	0	0	0	0
5a52ef00a260cc89	JACKASS== I think some people on Wikipedia are getting like little brats going around trying to bust people. You just have a lame life and you're trying to make up for it by pretending you have authority. You kid yourself into thinking you're a badass by picking on other users. ==	1	1	0	1	0
5a5323b5c1dd7bad	Tortoise Joustng In the jousting article, I noticed that there was no mention of tortoise jousting. Though many do not know about it, tortoise jousting is one of the main sports in Tongo. Tortoise jousting is just like regular jousting except for the fact that the Tongonese warriors rode tortoises instead of horses, since horses were not avalible in Tongo. I am an expert in tortoise jousting, I got a doctorate in it and have won many a tortoise jousting tournaments on the back of my faithful Sally, in the wondeful country of Tongo. I teach a tortoise jousting class in the University of the Tongo and am the head of the tortoise deparment for all of Tongo. Tortoise jousting was, and still remains a major jousting event and the fact that this site has nothing about it makes me violently ill. Tortoise jousting is the pride of Tongo and all of the Tongonese people and it is a blatant form of discrimination against the great people of Tongo to not mention their beloved sportoise. If I had majored in law instead of tortoise jousting I would sue you and make sure you never neglect the awesome power of tortoise jousting again.	0	0	0	0	0
5a5f08345db6eea4	Weed, are there any specific issues you have with the draft on the /Temp page? - 03:57, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
5a648f1df6572f6b	" {\| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""\| Hello, Brendan 1990! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! '''''' talk {\| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""\| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""\| {\| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"" !	0	0	0	0	0
5a69738266a30b06	" Delete this Article Listen here, people. This article needs to be deleted like I mentioned several days before. This is corrupting Wikipedia and the people who read it. Just because some freak brat didn't get ""it's"" way in life and killed itself, doesn't mean that they deserve a place on Wikipedia. Delete this article to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia!"	0	0	0	0	0
5a6b2ed2ce6fad34	Wow I haven't really read through but compared to the last version I saw, WOW! LOOKS GREAT! Anonymous User	0	0	0	0	0
5a7376bef9cb2863	" Una, I have (I hope) fixed this. Talk "	0	0	0	0	0
5a757e170cdb0b33	I disagree. I think the iconic 1960s Dylan is the most important and recognizable photo to have heading the article. This is a matter that has been discussed here before, and I think the last discussion settled on the 1960s Dylan to head the article. (Which is not to say that, given the right photo(s), the discussion might not go the other way this time.) There are more recent photos further down in the article; perhaps they could be given more prominence. And yes, you are correct, it looks like the lead photo is just a cropped version of the photo with Joan Baez. This isn't ideal, perhaps it could be fixed by changing one photo or the other.	0	0	0	0	0
5a76b68c3d0da82f	" Shortage of names? Was there an acute shortage of names in Migration Era Europe? I mean, seriously - two Hervors, two (or is that three) Angantyrs, and two Sifkas? There must have been a lot of misunderstandings - no wonder that era was so chaotic and warlike"" "	0	0	0	0	0
5a79b88034831e3e	I was Just indicating you fool Stupid Jew troutman.	1	1	0	1	1
5a7ca836c0f0ad72	" It should be obvious that that it is not the case of one troll ping-ponging himself. I use Australian IP adresses, and have a particular style of writing. The ""other one"" has a Bulgarian IP address and writes quite differently. But look at it logically. If it is two trolls ping-ponging, its a troll thread, best thing now is delete the whole thread. If it is two trolls ping ponging, then, its a troll thread, and definitely the best thing is to delete the whole thread. So it matters not - the best thing is to delete the whole thread - though it is probably too late now. The troll that started it with his fake appology has got his kicks now, and the other potential trolls out there have had plenty of time to discover it and be inspired to try their own variation. I suppose, thinking logically from your point of view, there is a third possibility. It could be a ping-ponging troll that wants it deleted for some weird troll purpose, or two trolls, one of which wants it deleted for some weird troll purpose. But what could that purpose be? Trolls feed on exposure, not by invisibility. If other trolls don't see the thread, or see it promptly removed, they loose their inspiration. So, please, delete the damm thread. Can't do any harm. Either way makes no difference to me personally. Wickwack (the real one)121.221.83.24 "	0	0	0	0	0
5a7e8ceb029dea6d	hey why must you be such a shithole? fuck off	1	1	0	1	0
5a82582c28936474	"Canada, Australia, New Zealand are all Dominions (i.e., Independent Countries that choose to have the Queen as their Figure-Head of State), and their ""Crowns"" are in fact the British Crown. But this must be noted by careful wording, and not the anti-Monarchist Pro-Republican slanted editoralising that is the hallmark of Homeontherange. "	0	0	0	0	0
5a86b7e034313766	So why is it listed as an upload option if Wikipedia does not allow it?	0	0	0	0	0
5a92bea3a63d2c3c	" I have created the next newsletter and will you create the 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500 or will you wait until later in the week? '''Slam''' "	0	0	0	0	0
5a99256f7ef6075b	Sorry to be late with this, I was sick. Aside from the several inline consensus comments already mentioned, here I achieve consensus with Photouploaded about the abortion language, perhaps the most controversial lead sentence; here several editors affirm (or decline to challenge) the importance of the stability of the then-current lead (though I presented this section poorly); and here I describe that consensus at that point for future reference (without challenge except for new edits from Vidor, with whom I obtained a separate consensus over a nonlead issue). I did mention a standing expressed discomfort of Gloriamarie's for Photouploaded's wording, but Gloriamarie has not commented lately. Those are good examples of how consensus is built by neutral discussion of all potential POVs. Now that there is a different group of editors with a stated disagreement, we must use consensus-building procedures again. So far (aside from the unprotection episode) I have not objected seriously to the editing of the lead, but if a specific textual disagreement should arise (you have not stated any) we will need to discuss here. (Oh, by the way, everything in the lead is thoroughly reliably sourced according to consensus, as you can tell when you find the expanded statements in the article. We also agreed to include only the most necessary footnotes in the lead.)	0	0	0	0	0
5a994aa2c0788dca	Donald Campbell and File:Donald Campbell.jpg Hi Katie, I'd like to request an undelete on your recent deletion of this image (WP:CSD#F7). This is for two reasons: It's the masthead, and only, image of a biography on an important motorsport and motorboat figure. Our precedent is clearly that such images are considered to fall under fair-use. If the FUR wasn't up to scratch on the image, then WP:BEFORE clearly indicates that the FUR should be fixed, not the image deleted. I've seen an awful lot of these lately - images uploaded a few years ago (so probably the more important images) with FUR that was adequate at their time of upload are being purged because they don't meet todays practice, even though it's a trivial filing exercise to bring them up to standard. This hurts the encyclopedia project. Secondly, it wasn't notified anywhere on the article. There are templates for notifying this on the page, there's a talk: page too. Many people, myself included, have articles like this on their watch lists but we don't have every constituent image watched. Now whilst policy doesn't demand this, it would clearly be a helpful and appropriate action to place some notification onto the article, especially when it's the masthead that's under threat. Thanks	0	0	0	0	0
5a9c4a4eef199a2d	" ""This is your only warning"" is a threat. "	1	0	0	0	0
5a9d1df688e84393	Once Again, you don't understand the pressure I am at right now. I'm feeling like my blood pressure is burning like the sun! There are users that are helpful, and there are users that get on my nerves and makes me want to get a shotgun and KILL THEM ALL!!!!!!	1	0	1	0	0
5a9e861f3946344c	See . 12:02, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
5aa1619678995d9d	Hello Thanks for your feedback here: . The user in question is and, as I pointed out in the discussion thread, I don't think I personally should be the one to warn him about his edits since it will only provoke him to anger (due to the fact that he has expressed his dislike for me in the past). That's why I think things would turn out better if you were to warn him, since he hasn't argued with you before and as a result he would be more receptive to feedback from you than from me.	0	0	0	0	0
5aab1eb28a6fcd3e	It is actually an X-linked recessive condition, so the odds for the disease would have been 50% for a boy and 0% for a girl born from such parents. A girl, however, would have a 50% chance of being a healthy carrier of the defective gene.	0	0	0	0	0
5aac2d7eb171bea1	You should tell us researcherers atlest where its located:(, that makes us feel very bad:(	0	0	0	0	0
5aad6611e6b92b05	WOW I WISH I WAS GONE I ONLY HAVE YAHIRA AS A FREND	0	0	0	0	0
5aad6b9345bb39a9	its from the show, i was about to put a link on the Dave chappelle article... Thanks man....... and i wasnt done	0	0	0	0	0
5ab405dad6539680	" MLK incident It's true that Greenberg said what he said. It's true that a Chicago Sun Times blog reported what he said. Those two facts, in and of themselves, do not make the MLK incident ""relevant"" to his ESPN career. The fact that there was no meaningful followup coverage in reliable sources should establish that. Alleging that Greenberg's comment was a Freudian slip simply because he has mentioned making such slips requires a citation from a reputable source establishing that he said he makes Freudian slips. I'll assume good faith on the part of the IP editor who has been reinserting the MLK incident, but I strongly question the relevance of including what appears to be a simple spoonerism, even if it has racial connotations. "	0	0	0	0	0
5abb4895a2a24150	" WP:ACADEMIC: ""It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject."" Lack of such material is clearly relevant to that guideline. Lack of this material is also the likely reason that this article is such a BLAND and BLOODLESS WP:RESUME stating little more than 'he was born, he went to university, he taught at university, he wrote Bible commentaries, some of which garnered some praise, he helped translate Bibles, he died' rendering him largely indistinguishable from any random Biblical scholar. ''TalkStalk''(P) "	0	0	0	0	0
5ac36b3a8e8ca444	, 21 November 2006 (UTC) You see Haunted Angel. Thats three of us. I do have allies, but I am not going to do anything to the site or bother you anymore. I wont force my faith on you and I hope you will on day see the light and join us Christians. 05:22	0	0	0	0	0
5ac38e70e068026c	This country has 2 self-identifying and official names, one used in certain contexts, another used in other contexts. Not to mention that a google search, if done properly (considering that the results for Republic of Macedonia include the results for Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) as above, can find that FYROM is more common in English.	0	0	0	0	0
5ac907a4723e389c	protect against skeptic-vandals Like DreamGuy someone puts in GROSSLY wrong factual info. Now, how can a NON-admin, like me, put on a block? PLEASE REPLY. DO NOT IGNORE. thanks beckjord	0	0	0	0	0
5ac9152d76656109	CJ DUB Continues To Insult Wiki Editors & Users The user, CJ DUB, has made direct and personal attacks upon all of us, thus breaking wiki rules. He seems like a troll. As you suggested days ago, this user must be blocked from making any comments on this page. He called me ignorant and has insulted the wiki editors for no reason whatsoever. He's also mocked the wiki editors, implying that the editors are not brave enough to stand up to him, that he gets away with insulting us.	0	0	0	0	0
5ace97d942e6f013	" Date of move for Beethoven's and Schubert's final resting place. Dear MagicPiano, In the 1863 edition of the British publication ""The Musical Standard"", the following paragraph is found on page 108 of the November issue. It appears that this sets the move date of the bodies earlier than the 1888 year given in the article. Or perhaps there were two moves?? It doesn't seem likely. (I have copied the paragraph digitized by The Google Book project and OCR'd the image, and then checked it for errors.) MUSICAL SACRILEGE.—The following paragraph has been going the round of the daily papers, appearing in the Globe under the head of Court Intelligence: (!)—""The Musical Society of Vienna having resolved that the mortal remains of Beethoven and of Schu-bert should be placed in more suitable vaults, the two bodies were exhumed on the 13th in the presence of a crowd of medical and artistic notabilities (!). The skeleton of Beethoven was almost perfect, the bone of the temples alone being wanting. The remains of Schubert had suffered much: the head and hair were intact. The bodies of the celebrated composers were photographed (!) upon being reburied."" [There is something essentially repulsive in the idea of disturbing the remains of Beethoven ""in the presence of a crowd of artistic —nobodies;—a proceeding not at all divested of culpably impertinent curiosity by the plea of reverence to the memory of the departed great.—ED.] 169.139.222.5 Robert Winslow"	0	0	0	0	0
5ad2f344b0cd7620	" Northland maps Hi Gadfium, long time no see ) Just noticed a slight problem with the coordinates on the Northland map used for settlements - wondered if you could take a look. Dots for places seem to be too far north (Panguru is supposed to be on the north coast of the Hokianga, Opononi has moved from the south coast to the north, and Kaikohe looks like it's in the middle of Lake Omapere). Presumably the coordinates for the map are set wrong, but I don't know how to deal with that. Cheers, ...wha? "	0	0	0	0	0
5ad3d0f29c0a4c9e	Ivan Dixon Hi, I think you've probably reverted my edits to Mr. Dixon's Wikipedia article. I am a friend of the family but I don't know when an official obituary will be published. I will leave the article until I can cite a source. Probably in the Charlotte newspaper or the NY Times.	0	0	0	0	0
5adde4e1a8be7fd1	WOW I'm like really scared. Do your worst. HA! HA! 68.45.180.34	1	0	0	0	0
5ade044c94894794	" Not sure. Sharingan stems from the Byakugan, which in turn comes from the Rinnegan, but their powers haven't really been compared. Byakugan allows for taijutsu, Sharingan for genjutsu, and Rinnegan for ninjutsu. getsu "	0	0	0	0	0
5adf00172f326afc	"Instead, it should be in the 1980's section and should read: ""In 1988–1989, he also served as operations officer to the 3rd Infantry Division's (Mechanized) 2nd Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment (Mechanized) and its 1st Brigade. Mel "	0	0	0	0	0
5ae5334f7d61a55f	are actually meaningful to me	0	0	0	0	0
5ae6e5a206fad6ce	Widzer the last edit was for formating, putting it into last style. is that not coorect thanks	0	0	0	0	0
5ae9311d800bd8d1	ps i can change my ip address, create a new account anyday and get my revenge anyday.	0	0	0	0	0
5aed81fad8919753	Hmm, let me dig around, but I'm afraid I have no clue where something like this can be found. As for Toka and Kuular, it is likely that the PD photos of them exist (under the terms of commons:Template:PD-old-70), but, again, no idea if any would be available online.— • (yo?); October 25, 2010; 13:44 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
5af055366d3248ed	Because if it turns out I am wrong in the terms of licensing or design, only one project is affected. I have all of the SVG files on my computer and I can upload them to the Commons in due time using Commonist.	0	0	0	0	0
5af7c8edffa66232	Wikipedia works by adding to articles where they are scarce, not by removing from articles where they are rich. Those who think the article is scarce on tidal stream please step up to the plate and add NPOV and non-commercial material in that area.	0	0	0	0	0
5af8fa7f5f5417ef	":Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza84's page about	0	0	0	0	0
5af932c9b6d8291e	", 18 January 2008 (UTC) You know, I'd be in favour of a reduced Studio Alliances section (""Studio Support""), given this isn't a comparison article and as written the whole thing is utterly unreadable. Something along the lines of a bulleted list of studios supporting HD DVD (with an appropriate asterisk and comment next to WB), and a short paragraph reporting that many studios have decided to actively not support HD DVD, preferring Blu-ray, and reporting the major ones. The way I see it, it would work something along the lines of: Studio Support To date, approximately 30% of recently released movies are available in HD DVD format. The following studios and publishers offer HD DVD content: Universal Studios (including subsidiaries Focus Features and Rogue Pictures) Paramount Pictures Nickelodeon Movies MTV Films DreamWorks Pictures and DreamWorks Animation The Weinstein Company (including Dimension Films). The BBC First Look Studios Image Entertainment (including the Discovery Channel) Magnolia Pictures Brentwood Home Video Ryko Koch/Goldhil Entertainment Medusa Home Entertainment Studio Canal Universum Films Kinowelt Home Entertainment DVD International Opus Arte MK2 Momentum Pictures Twister Home Video Additionally Warner Brothers currently releases its content on HD DVD, though has announced it will cease supporting HD DVD in June 2008. Many major studios have chosen not to support HD DVD, having decided to exclusively back the rival Blu-ray format. These studios include Fox, Disney, and many others. This is a much simpler and easier to read than the current ""ACME studios announced it plans to support HD DVD for three weeks in March, but pr0n Studios Inc has released 72% of its content in the Chinese EVD format but plans to switch to HD DVD in 2009"" format that the section is in currently. And it does do away with the need to have a graph in that section as it's no longer a richard-waving area. Comments? 21:16"	0	0	0	0	0
5aff2d3989bb0818	Welcome! Hello, Nazim25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	0	0	0	0	0
5b04e5424b37ebb0	ok mr. SS gestapo, block me, throw me in the ovens and gas me, i know you love to do it. SIEG HEIL is your motto so stick by it you hitler-loving bastard.	1	0	0	0	0
5b098698309515d6	"Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (74.131.58.64) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! (reasoning) "	0	0	0	0	0
5b0b10d7ee1ea67f	I think that you simply promote your boss Alexius II in wikipedia. This has nothing to do with Catholic Church. What is my interest here? Nothing except promoting knowledge in general, as one can see from my edits on a variety of topics from biology and physical chemistry to history and politics.	0	0	0	0	0
5b10e261194be519	" He invented the Internet! In this conception of the ""matrix"", he predicted a worldwide communications network eleven years before the origin of the World Wide Web,[45] although related notions had been described elsewhere. As a big fan, and as a computer guy, I view this sentence as garbage. I want to take it out, and the reference to it in paragraph 1. It is irrelevant that the WWW spec was published 11 years later. People were telnetting and gophering long before the WWW. "	0	0	0	0	0
5b12d65a4de3f502	Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dutch Golden Age, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.	0	0	0	0	0
5b15c183b6d7b5c7	" Civility I don't think you deserve any civility, and your talk page/edit history goes a long way in showing that. You appear to be one of the worst kinds of Israelis/pro-Israel people you're even pro ""settler"". So no, I'm not going to worry about ""not treating you with civility"". "	0	0	0	0	0
5b160f4e15b6a058	" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to George-Étienne Cartier. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' "	0	0	0	0	0
5b17acce8ab23800	I do not understand what I said that was not constructive.	0	0	0	0	0
5b18978a1992a679	BLP edits Will have a look at M'Lord's page, the blogoheadlines have shifted to the hitherto little known Harold Lewis who was a co-signatory with Fred Singer of a petition in June last year, and has now allegedly written a scathing resignation letter. Have put some bio source material at BLPN , it's been semi'd but a generally reasonable editor has added the letter sourced to El Reg. Not everyone thinks that's a good source for anything, too late for me tonight and rather busy tomorrow. . , talk	0	0	0	0	0
5b18eef20c91c18b	I'm desperately trying to avoid breaking WP:3RR here! According to the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here), 'three new episode titles' will be revealed in DWM issue 380. As this isn't officially on sale until 1 March 2007, please refrain from adding links and/or articles for Blink (Doctor Who), The Sound of Drums (Doctor Who), Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) (the latter two currently redirect to List of Doctor Who serials) or any similar titles. Please revert your edits to the Series 3 section of List of Doctor Who serials. Thank you.	0	0	0	0	0
5b1b2b4b32479d50	It has nothing to do with Qawwali but so is the case of Marsiya and Ghazal. Marsiya is a Shia thing and they would be very offended if it is referred to as Qawwali, something they do not approve.	0	0	0	0	0
5b1c82b0378047f5	I confess I recently climbed the Reichstag dressed as Batman, is this allowed?	0	0	0	0	0
5b27212e969beb2c	" OTOH, it's not likely to be desirable to leave this ""open"" while the NC subpage allegedly reaches a consensus (this has been rolling around for months already, and could do for who-know-how-long), then then goes to CFR. "	0	0	0	0	0
5b2777cee9c19b4e	Military Importance Any references to this? Or can it be deleted, because w/o the reference it isn't verifable.	0	0	0	0	0
5b31d28a52538002	Deletion query Hello! Question regarding the deletion of Solar Photovoltaic Academic Research Consortium, it was flagged for copyright issues and I posted a note on the talk page that I was the orignator and copyright holder of the information on the page in question, can you please undelete and mark this as ok, or is a significant rewrite required? Thanks.	0	0	0	0	0
5b359fb7079cd71a	" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Twenty20. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. \|\| talk "	0	0	0	0	0
5b379714f150bcde	hi what up bugs baseball bugs private website and User:Baseball Bugs having fun!]] the acitivities of the pro vietnamese gouc Dave1185 Dave1185 private website and User:Baseball Bugs having fun!]]	0	0	0	0	0
5b3a5a2bce1e4736	Ok Got it! Thanks!	0	0	0	0	0
5b3f8a5243e4e455	And... I don't care =] Block me. Idiot	1	0	0	0	0
5b470019b6691af8	i apologize for making such rude comments. Erik Thompson.	0	0	0	0	0
5b47403854619de2	\| decline=Take a hike, idiot!	1	0	0	1	0
5b4c4c4b4c8844af	Legends Field The official dedication has not yet taken place and is still referred to as Legends Field. This article is inaccurate	0	0	0	0	0
5b4ff5a569c895e3	Marital Infedelities Recently I watched a documentary on King. What is here only a few lines, was about 10 mins of a 2 hour doco. Dr King had many affairs with many women. Often (if memory serves) more than one woman at a time. This is a significant point, as it is is often used to discredit King, and it deserves more than the few lines that it gets here. Riff	0	0	0	0	0
5b57134b06be88ce	Unspecified source for Image:S5300014.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:S5300014.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ''''''	0	0	0	0	0
5b5a11d79b048a19	^Why do you use such poor grammar?	0	0	0	0	0
5b61fb6ce10d59de	"Our Company the ""Company"": www.ultimatewater.net Ultimate Water & Coffee is the leading provider of drinking water solutions, cleaning supplies and ""Full Break Room Solutions"" to businesses. We feature thousands of products ranging from water filtration systems and full coffee service to paper towels, hand soap and Lysol. Ultimate Water & Coffee brings over 20+ years of industry experience to businesses in your area. Currently we service over 9,000 customers in Florida. In today's economy, small businesses and Fortune 500 customers are looking for greater value, convenience and smart solutions. Our Mission & Vision: We strive to be the best but not the largest. We deliver quality. Our niche is to provide businesses with the purest glass of drinking water. best tasting coffee cup and a wide selection of product delivery while saving money-guaranteed. Here is how it works: we deliver distilled-quality water through our new, patented water filtration systems. Such systems are connected to our new, patented coffee machines coupled with premium coffee beans and GREEN products the final result is the best cup of coffee. That is spelled QUALITY. Take The Challenge Experience The Difference, Absolutely FREE!* No Cost, No Obligation www.ultimatewater.net Interested in Ultimate Water Products and Service? Please call us at 1-561-586-2077 or email us."	0	0	0	0	0
5b660bb7a0beafe9	The difference between those 2 links is that I have not yet evaluated one (westfieldnj.com), but I have the other (westfield-online.com). You see, I keep on my watchlist thousands of articles that I have edited, and I monitor changes to those articles. New changes catch my attention much more quickly than existing content. I noticed the change you made to the Westfield NJ article, saw that the link was affiliated with or otherwise connected to the other links you have added (veotag) and removed it as such (per guidelines regarding spamming). Just because I haven't gotten around to checking out westfieldnj.com yet doesn't mean I feel it should stay. If you think that the westfieldnj.com is also not appropriate for the article, feel free to remove it yourself if you'd like. (talk)	0	0	0	0	0
5b668f47dc9862d9	I agree, could someone please put it on Wiki page and then protect it again? caffolote 19:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
5b6bdf8432d0e845	" There are some in the LCMS who are opposed to scouting, and instead operate a separate ""Ranger/Rangerette"" program. The WELS are not the only ones. Boy Scouts prohibit Trinitarian statements (as they would make the non-Trinitarians in the group antagonized.) are also have a large number of Mormons active in the leadership. "	0	0	0	0	0
5b6dbb14f0950949	An editor should be careful and specific about which edits are thought to be not NPOV before reverting another editor's hard work wholesale. For example, what is not NPOV about stating that Candace was killed at a home in Evergreen and not in Golden? Because it happens to be the geographical location of a lot of leading attachment therapists? The therapists (plural) were not clearly unlicensed, as a reliable source has stated otherwise. It is POV to insist upon mistaken and misleading information be included, especially when the inclusion serves no good purpose. It is a settled question that a reliable source about a topic can be listed in a reading section. Besides, I didn't list it in the first place. The reversion is to a version which is, in my opinion, hopelessly inaccurate, biased and POV. Reversions to that version should stop.	0	0	0	0	0
5b6eed220142dac5	Your messages. I am sorry but what are you talking about?	0	0	0	0	0
5b6fbcb1b4c2b33d	" Go out in a blaze of glory...on my own talk page??? No, that's not my intention at all. It's a very small venue to go out on, I can assure you. My intention is simply to tell the truth. Even if it hurts. On that, I don't compromise. If that appears suidical to you, it's a sad indictment on the frequency of truth telling in you neck of the woods. Others compromise on truth, often because they care about $$$ more than truth. That's what I believe motivates the deletions on WP and elsewhere regarding monetary reform. That's why this stuff isn't EVER published in ""mainstream"" sources. This stuff is starved of funds until it dies. People who care about $$$ more than truth hate people pointing this out to them. Because it hurts. It shows they aren't very smart, but they are very selfish. It's as simple as that. One other thing. Wealth distribution is a separate and distinct issue from the issue of money creation and distribution. They are related and they do interact, but they are distinct issues. Many Libertarians (such as Ron Paul) couldn't care less about wealth distribution provided the way in which money creation is just and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution. Free markets can determine wealth distribution - provided the way in which money is created is open and democractically approved and ""just"" and the product of rational discussion (i.e. not based on the threat of a bullet to the head if you question the current method of money creation and distribution). Once new money is created, it gets gets circulated according to the tax laws, and competition laws, and finance laws and a multitude of other factors, and ends up in someone's account somewhere. Money creation is (arguably) much more important and has many more dynamic implications for an economy than wealth distribution, which is a separate issue. Again, this confusion shows that the level of understanding of these issues is woeful and I despair at ever increasing the general public's understanding of these vitally important issues, especially given the limitless $$$s financing the countervailing forces (Gregalton, Zenwhat, etc) that are lined up against anyone questioning the sustainability and pointing out the absolute stupidity of the current debt-based system. "	0	0	0	0	0
5b7674c4043b1d11	" History of Doctor Who‎ Greetings, I trust your opinions on all pages of Doctor Who, so I wonder if you could help resolve an issue over a section title in ""History of Doctor Who‎"". An anonymous IP keeps entering into an edit war over it, resulting in recent protection being applied. No agreement was reached over a title change so I reverted it back to what it was (A New Era) but the IP came back and reverted it again! We need a majority verdict on the title, whether it stays as ""A New Era"" or is changed to his suggestion of ""Taking Chances"". Cheers "	0	0	0	0	0
5b793d2833f6fc3d	McCain has often made slef-deprecating remarks, as well as remarks that show considerable humility; such remarks sound very different coming from him than they do from anyone else, and I think we're on much firmer ground relying on secondary sources than his own words.	0	0	0	0	0
5b794b68bb9b7c5a	Blackberry I think the article about Canadian Economy could include a picture of a Blackberry, the most famous manufactured product of Canada today, just to show that Canada is not based only in Energy and Agriculture. Also a picture of a Bombardier high speed train would be interesting...83.35.183.14	0	0	0	0	0
5b7e64b7207ff0a6	Thanks! What now? Hey , it's me again. I flew around the world but now I'm back on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for adding the information to the article. What do we do now though? What if someone wants to check the source themselves, how will they know where to go?	0	0	0	0	0
5b8628473d4b8558	Wait, what? How does this work? 65.200.64.163	0	0	0	0	0
5b88bf49301a4e10	What the heck i have a family of 2000 that i must support. if i get money in the form of cash i will not die of the bubonic plague. my address is 100 suck my lane Bangkok Vietnam. i swear if i dont get the money my mother will call me a nubkin. I have a friend called jeremy and he is also my boyfriend:). All i want for christmas is mariah carey in a blanket. Barbara rochon plays tennis with Charly who plays the eukalalay professionaly and she hates america.	0	0	0	0	0
5b8a4c8f9acf24ce	(forgot the Coast Guard)	0	0	0	0	0
5b8ab39bb600e231	GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Ironside/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: (talk · contribs) Will aim to get to this later in the week. Cheers,	0	0	0	0	0
5b8b213f15dfff3a	Solomon has added some more fuel to the fire, and good for him. Great article on April 26th about some more of the shenanigans going on on this topic. Link is here: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/04/26/the-real-climate-martians-solomon.aspx	0	0	0	0	0
5b902996997bc9cd	" This IGN piece just sources from Serebii which means it also cannot be used.— (琉竜) "	0	0	0	0	0
5b996106f48e93eb	" No, I FUCKING REWROTE THE WHOLE ARTICLE already (first as an anomymous user). It was ""a mess of the article"", before I did, starting last year or early this year, I don't remember. I provided most of reception, I rewrote most of everything else. Hello? "	1	1	0	0	0
5ba113943acb7a0e	" Assessments Thank you for adding template tags on WikiProject Environment articles. Try consider Outriggr's tool to assess article class. After that, I will reward you the Environmental Barnstar. If you have questions on how to assign class of articles, please don't hesitate to contact me. Talk page "	0	0	0	0	0
5ba48943289d03c6	" I was the one who originally wrote the plot summary and requested it be cleaned up because I wasn't happy with how it flowed in an ""emcyplopedia"" format. It appears a lot better now, and if you want to remove the tag, by all means, go ahead. "	0	0	0	0	0
5ba74256d8171ed1	I said nothing about Redwatch. What I said was that it is not reasonable to compare Harry's Place to it, and that no significant body of opinion has done so. No use making the argument here. You go out and find a significant body of opinion and the article can report their opinion. That's really all there is to say on the matter. . fys aym.	0	0	0	0	0
5ba90a9215b0473c	82ASK Hi Arglebargle IV I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia pages, so am a bit confused as to why my changes to the 82ASK entry keep on getting blocked. I basically work on behalf of 82ASK and have been tasked with updating company information to Wikipedia. I have followed all NPOV guidelines and have not included anything salesy. So please, please, please, reconsider my changes. Thanks raxraxrax	0	0	0	0	0
5bafdf6d7d14e460	"You should not talk of ""misrepresentation"" if your entire ""knowledge"" on the matter stems from online ideological pamphlets, while you wouldn't recognized an academic source if it was shoved in your face. Go and edit some blog, but stop pestering Wikipedia with your naive nonsense. "	0	0	0	0	0
5bb2267b3db9b200	" ""The LORD said to Moses, ""Cut two stone tablets like the former, that I may write on them the commandments which were on the former tablets that you broke."" So who's writing the commandments? God. ""And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten words."" Who's writing the covenant? Moses. Sure, you can present an exegesis that results in the conclusion that they are the same. But the plain text of the Bible does not clearly establish that they are the same. That's what I mean by taking the Bible at face value. Exegesis should not be presented as fact. This is an encyclopedia of facts, not of intrepretation. Clearly, you are the one insisting on not being neutral, writing that this is the ""correct"" interpretation and reverting my edit which do not, as you imply, assert a different interpretation, but merely point out that the Bible is not clear on this matter. Your edits are based entirely on what YOU SAY the Bible means, not what the Bible actually says. You're in violation of NPOV no matter what, but unless you can present a reputable source giving your interpretation, you're also in violation of NOR."	0	0	0	0	0
5bb35bdb16998d5e	" WTF?! want != need Obviously, the idiot that wrote ""the need for instant gratification"" failed economics 101. A need is something you must have for survival; that isn't instant gratification. A want is something that you would like to have but can live without. The guy that edited this is probably a consumerist moron with thousands in credit card debt. Debtors are fools that shouldn't be allowed to own anything. This is why a fully market economy can't end poverty. Only those with a proper education should be allowed to participate in a market economy. Fools that don't know the difference between a want and a need should be owned by their employer. Their employer can better determine what they need than themselves. Poverty would be eliminated by this mix of a command and market economies. The remaining unemployed, fat, and lazy fools can go to jail. I am now going to correct the article because I'm a genius and the previous editor is not. 76.178.252.151 "	1	0	0	0	0
5bb5b9bdf9d3ca5f	As I already said, I have provided diffs, and you have simply lied about what is in them. So clearly providing diffs is of no value.	0	0	0	0	0
5bb73a203067cd08	Oh yes, missed that, I was searching for SEPP	0	0	0	0	0

5a49af810b1e1fe5

I have posted this edit war to AN/I. Please stop the edit war or it will be stopped for you. And don't forget WP:3RR. ÷ talk

0

5a4dbc100baec2d9

I like that daft very much, looks far better. I welcome this format to the walmart entry. Maybe with this Rebuild we can purge some of the POV that are very much built right into the entry after years of POV being inserted as facts.The Ace!

0

5a52ef00a260cc89

JACKASS== I think some people on Wikipedia are getting like little brats going around trying to bust people. You just have a lame life and you're trying to make up for it by pretending you have authority. You kid yourself into thinking you're a badass by picking on other users. ==

1

0

1

0

1

0

5a5323b5c1dd7bad

Tortoise Joustng In the jousting article, I noticed that there was no mention of tortoise jousting. Though many do not know about it, tortoise jousting is one of the main sports in Tongo. Tortoise jousting is just like regular jousting except for the fact that the Tongonese warriors rode tortoises instead of horses, since horses were not avalible in Tongo. I am an expert in tortoise jousting, I got a doctorate in it and have won many a tortoise jousting tournaments on the back of my faithful Sally, in the wondeful country of Tongo. I teach a tortoise jousting class in the University of the Tongo and am the head of the tortoise deparment for all of Tongo. Tortoise jousting was, and still remains a major jousting event and the fact that this site has nothing about it makes me violently ill. Tortoise jousting is the pride of Tongo and all of the Tongonese people and it is a blatant form of discrimination against the great people of Tongo to not mention their beloved sportoise. If I had majored in law instead of tortoise jousting I would sue you and make sure you never neglect the awesome power of tortoise jousting again.

0

5a5f08345db6eea4

Weed, are there any specific issues you have with the draft on the /Temp page? - 03:57, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

0

5a648f1df6572f6b

" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""| Hello, Brendan 1990! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! '''''' talk {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"" !

0

5a69738266a30b06

" Delete this Article Listen here, people. This article needs to be deleted like I mentioned several days before. This is corrupting Wikipedia and the people who read it. Just because some freak brat didn't get ""it's"" way in life and killed itself, doesn't mean that they deserve a place on Wikipedia. Delete this article to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia!"

0

5a6b2ed2ce6fad34

Wow I haven't really read through but compared to the last version I saw, WOW! LOOKS GREAT! Anonymous User

0

5a7376bef9cb2863

" Una, I have (I hope) fixed this. Talk "

0

5a757e170cdb0b33

I disagree. I think the iconic 1960s Dylan is the most important and recognizable photo to have heading the article. This is a matter that has been discussed here before, and I think the last discussion settled on the 1960s Dylan to head the article. (Which is not to say that, given the right photo(s), the discussion might not go the other way this time.) There are more recent photos further down in the article; perhaps they could be given more prominence. And yes, you are correct, it looks like the lead photo is just a cropped version of the photo with Joan Baez. This isn't ideal, perhaps it could be fixed by changing one photo or the other.

0

5a76b68c3d0da82f

" Shortage of names? Was there an acute shortage of names in Migration Era Europe? I mean, seriously - two Hervors, two (or is that three) Angantyrs, and two Sifkas? There must have been a lot of misunderstandings - no wonder that era was so chaotic and warlike"" "

0

5a79b88034831e3e

I was Just indicating you fool Stupid Jew troutman.

1

0

1

0

1

5a7ca836c0f0ad72

" It should be obvious that that it is not the case of one troll ping-ponging himself. I use Australian IP adresses, and have a particular style of writing. The ""other one"" has a Bulgarian IP address and writes quite differently. But look at it logically. If it is two trolls ping-ponging, its a troll thread, best thing now is delete the whole thread. If it is two trolls ping ponging, then, its a troll thread, and definitely the best thing is to delete the whole thread. So it matters not - the best thing is to delete the whole thread - though it is probably too late now. The troll that started it with his fake appology has got his kicks now, and the other potential trolls out there have had plenty of time to discover it and be inspired to try their own variation. I suppose, thinking logically from your point of view, there is a third possibility. It could be a ping-ponging troll that wants it deleted for some weird troll purpose, or two trolls, one of which wants it deleted for some weird troll purpose. But what could that purpose be? Trolls feed on exposure, not by invisibility. If other trolls don't see the thread, or see it promptly removed, they loose their inspiration. So, please, delete the damm thread. Can't do any harm. Either way makes no difference to me personally. Wickwack (the real one)121.221.83.24 "

0

5a7e8ceb029dea6d

hey why must you be such a shithole? fuck off

1

0

1

0

1

0

5a82582c28936474

"Canada, Australia, New Zealand are all Dominions (i.e., Independent Countries that choose to have the Queen as their Figure-Head of State), and their ""Crowns"" are in fact the British Crown. But this must be noted by careful wording, and not the anti-Monarchist Pro-Republican slanted editoralising that is the hallmark of Homeontherange. "

0

5a86b7e034313766

So why is it listed as an upload option if Wikipedia does not allow it?

0

5a92bea3a63d2c3c

" I have created the next newsletter and will you create the 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500 or will you wait until later in the week? '''Slam''' "

0

5a99256f7ef6075b

Sorry to be late with this, I was sick. Aside from the several inline consensus comments already mentioned, here I achieve consensus with Photouploaded about the abortion language, perhaps the most controversial lead sentence; here several editors affirm (or decline to challenge) the importance of the stability of the then-current lead (though I presented this section poorly); and here I describe that consensus at that point for future reference (without challenge except for new edits from Vidor, with whom I obtained a separate consensus over a nonlead issue). I did mention a standing expressed discomfort of Gloriamarie's for Photouploaded's wording, but Gloriamarie has not commented lately. Those are good examples of how consensus is built by neutral discussion of all potential POVs. Now that there is a different group of editors with a stated disagreement, we must use consensus-building procedures again. So far (aside from the unprotection episode) I have not objected seriously to the editing of the lead, but if a specific textual disagreement should arise (you have not stated any) we will need to discuss here. (Oh, by the way, everything in the lead is thoroughly reliably sourced according to consensus, as you can tell when you find the expanded statements in the article. We also agreed to include only the most necessary footnotes in the lead.)

0

5a994aa2c0788dca

Donald Campbell and File:Donald Campbell.jpg Hi Katie, I'd like to request an undelete on your recent deletion of this image (WP:CSD#F7). This is for two reasons: It's the masthead, and only, image of a biography on an important motorsport and motorboat figure. Our precedent is clearly that such images are considered to fall under fair-use. If the FUR wasn't up to scratch on the image, then WP:BEFORE clearly indicates that the FUR should be fixed, not the image deleted. I've seen an awful lot of these lately - images uploaded a few years ago (so probably the more important images) with FUR that was adequate at their time of upload are being purged because they don't meet todays practice, even though it's a trivial filing exercise to bring them up to standard. This hurts the encyclopedia project. Secondly, it wasn't notified anywhere on the article. There are templates for notifying this on the page, there's a talk: page too. Many people, myself included, have articles like this on their watch lists but we don't have every constituent image watched. Now whilst policy doesn't demand this, it would clearly be a helpful and appropriate action to place some notification onto the article, especially when it's the masthead that's under threat. Thanks

0

5a9c4a4eef199a2d

" ""This is your only warning"" is a threat. "

1

0

5a9d1df688e84393

Once Again, you don't understand the pressure I am at right now. I'm feeling like my blood pressure is burning like the sun! There are users that are helpful, and there are users that get on my nerves and makes me want to get a shotgun and KILL THEM ALL!!!!!!

1

0

1

0

5a9e861f3946344c

See . 12:02, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC)

0

5aa1619678995d9d

Hello Thanks for your feedback here: . The user in question is and, as I pointed out in the discussion thread, I don't think I personally should be the one to warn him about his edits since it will only provoke him to anger (due to the fact that he has expressed his dislike for me in the past). That's why I think things would turn out better if you were to warn him, since he hasn't argued with you before and as a result he would be more receptive to feedback from you than from me.

0

5aab1eb28a6fcd3e

It is actually an X-linked recessive condition, so the odds for the disease would have been 50% for a boy and 0% for a girl born from such parents. A girl, however, would have a 50% chance of being a healthy carrier of the defective gene.

0

5aac2d7eb171bea1

You should tell us researcherers atlest where its located:(, that makes us feel very bad:(

0

5aad6611e6b92b05

WOW I WISH I WAS GONE I ONLY HAVE YAHIRA AS A FREND

0

5aad6b9345bb39a9

its from the show, i was about to put a link on the Dave chappelle article... Thanks man....... and i wasnt done

0

5ab405dad6539680

" MLK incident It's true that Greenberg said what he said. It's true that a Chicago Sun Times blog reported what he said. Those two facts, in and of themselves, do not make the MLK incident ""relevant"" to his ESPN career. The fact that there was no meaningful followup coverage in reliable sources should establish that. Alleging that Greenberg's comment was a Freudian slip simply because he has mentioned making such slips requires a citation from a reputable source establishing that he said he makes Freudian slips. I'll assume good faith on the part of the IP editor who has been reinserting the MLK incident, but I strongly question the relevance of including what appears to be a simple spoonerism, even if it has racial connotations. "

0

5abb4895a2a24150

" WP:ACADEMIC: ""It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject."" Lack of such material is clearly relevant to that guideline. Lack of this material is also the likely reason that this article is such a BLAND and BLOODLESS WP:RESUME stating little more than 'he was born, he went to university, he taught at university, he wrote Bible commentaries, some of which garnered some praise, he helped translate Bibles, he died' rendering him largely indistinguishable from any random Biblical scholar. ''TalkStalk''(P) "

0

5ac36b3a8e8ca444

, 21 November 2006 (UTC) You see Haunted Angel. Thats three of us. I do have allies, but I am not going to do anything to the site or bother you anymore. I wont force my faith on you and I hope you will on day see the light and join us Christians. 05:22

0

5ac38e70e068026c

This country has 2 self-identifying and official names, one used in certain contexts, another used in other contexts. Not to mention that a google search, if done properly (considering that the results for Republic of Macedonia include the results for Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) as above, can find that FYROM is more common in English.

0

5ac907a4723e389c

protect against skeptic-vandals Like DreamGuy someone puts in GROSSLY wrong factual info. Now, how can a NON-admin, like me, put on a block? PLEASE REPLY. DO NOT IGNORE. thanks beckjord

0

5ac9152d76656109

CJ DUB Continues To Insult Wiki Editors & Users The user, CJ DUB, has made direct and personal attacks upon all of us, thus breaking wiki rules. He seems like a troll. As you suggested days ago, this user must be blocked from making any comments on this page. He called me ignorant and has insulted the wiki editors for no reason whatsoever. He's also mocked the wiki editors, implying that the editors are not brave enough to stand up to him, that he gets away with insulting us.

0

5ace97d942e6f013

" Date of move for Beethoven's and Schubert's final resting place. Dear MagicPiano, In the 1863 edition of the British publication ""The Musical Standard"", the following paragraph is found on page 108 of the November issue. It appears that this sets the move date of the bodies earlier than the 1888 year given in the article. Or perhaps there were two moves?? It doesn't seem likely. (I have copied the paragraph digitized by The Google Book project and OCR'd the image, and then checked it for errors.) MUSICAL SACRILEGE.—The following paragraph has been going the round of the daily papers, appearing in the Globe under the head of Court Intelligence: (!)—""The Musical Society of Vienna having resolved that the mortal remains of Beethoven and of Schu-bert should be placed in more suitable vaults, the two bodies were exhumed on the 13th in the presence of a crowd of medical and artistic notabilities (!). The skeleton of Beethoven was almost perfect, the bone of the temples alone being wanting. The remains of Schubert had suffered much: the head and hair were intact. The bodies of the celebrated composers were photographed (!) upon being reburied."" [There is something essentially repulsive in the idea of disturbing the remains of Beethoven ""in the presence of a crowd of artistic —nobodies;—a proceeding not at all divested of culpably impertinent curiosity by the plea of reverence to the memory of the departed great.—ED.] 169.139.222.5 Robert Winslow"

0

5ad2f344b0cd7620

" Northland maps Hi Gadfium, long time no see ) Just noticed a slight problem with the coordinates on the Northland map used for settlements - wondered if you could take a look. Dots for places seem to be too far north (Panguru is supposed to be on the north coast of the Hokianga, Opononi has moved from the south coast to the north, and Kaikohe looks like it's in the middle of Lake Omapere). Presumably the coordinates for the map are set wrong, but I don't know how to deal with that. Cheers, ...wha? "

0

5ad3d0f29c0a4c9e

Ivan Dixon Hi, I think you've probably reverted my edits to Mr. Dixon's Wikipedia article. I am a friend of the family but I don't know when an official obituary will be published. I will leave the article until I can cite a source. Probably in the Charlotte newspaper or the NY Times.

0

5adde4e1a8be7fd1

WOW I'm like really scared. Do your worst. HA! HA! 68.45.180.34

1

0

5ade044c94894794

" Not sure. Sharingan stems from the Byakugan, which in turn comes from the Rinnegan, but their powers haven't really been compared. Byakugan allows for taijutsu, Sharingan for genjutsu, and Rinnegan for ninjutsu. getsu "

0

5adf00172f326afc

"Instead, it should be in the 1980's section and should read: ""In 1988–1989, he also served as operations officer to the 3rd Infantry Division's (Mechanized) 2nd Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment (Mechanized) and its 1st Brigade. Mel "

0

5ae5334f7d61a55f

are actually meaningful to me

0

5ae6e5a206fad6ce

Widzer the last edit was for formating, putting it into last style. is that not coorect thanks

0

5ae9311d800bd8d1

ps i can change my ip address, create a new account anyday and get my revenge anyday.

0

5aed81fad8919753

Hmm, let me dig around, but I'm afraid I have no clue where something like this can be found. As for Toka and Kuular, it is likely that the PD photos of them exist (under the terms of commons:Template:PD-old-70), but, again, no idea if any would be available online.— • (yo?); October 25, 2010; 13:44 (UTC)

0

5af055366d3248ed

Because if it turns out I am wrong in the terms of licensing or design, only one project is affected. I have all of the SVG files on my computer and I can upload them to the Commons in due time using Commonist.

0

5af7c8edffa66232

Wikipedia works by adding to articles where they are scarce, not by removing from articles where they are rich. Those who think the article is scarce on tidal stream please step up to the plate and add NPOV and non-commercial material in that area.

0

5af8fa7f5f5417ef

":Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza84's page about

0

5af932c9b6d8291e

", 18 January 2008 (UTC) You know, I'd be in favour of a reduced Studio Alliances section (""Studio Support""), given this isn't a comparison article and as written the whole thing is utterly unreadable. Something along the lines of a bulleted list of studios supporting HD DVD (with an appropriate asterisk and comment next to WB), and a short paragraph reporting that many studios have decided to actively not support HD DVD, preferring Blu-ray, and reporting the major ones. The way I see it, it would work something along the lines of: Studio Support To date, approximately 30% of recently released movies are available in HD DVD format. The following studios and publishers offer HD DVD content: Universal Studios (including subsidiaries Focus Features and Rogue Pictures) Paramount Pictures Nickelodeon Movies MTV Films DreamWorks Pictures and DreamWorks Animation The Weinstein Company (including Dimension Films). The BBC First Look Studios Image Entertainment (including the Discovery Channel) Magnolia Pictures Brentwood Home Video Ryko Koch/Goldhil Entertainment Medusa Home Entertainment Studio Canal Universum Films Kinowelt Home Entertainment DVD International Opus Arte MK2 Momentum Pictures Twister Home Video Additionally Warner Brothers currently releases its content on HD DVD, though has announced it will cease supporting HD DVD in June 2008. Many major studios have chosen not to support HD DVD, having decided to exclusively back the rival Blu-ray format. These studios include Fox, Disney, and many others. This is a much simpler and easier to read than the current ""ACME studios announced it plans to support HD DVD for three weeks in March, but pr0n Studios Inc has released 72% of its content in the Chinese EVD format but plans to switch to HD DVD in 2009"" format that the section is in currently. And it does do away with the need to have a graph in that section as it's no longer a richard-waving area. Comments? 21:16"

0

5aff2d3989bb0818

Welcome! Hello, Nazim25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

0

5b04e5424b37ebb0

ok mr. SS gestapo, block me, throw me in the ovens and gas me, i know you love to do it. SIEG HEIL is your motto so stick by it you hitler-loving bastard.

1

0

5b098698309515d6

"Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (74.131.58.64) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! (reasoning) "

0

5b0b10d7ee1ea67f

I think that you simply promote your boss Alexius II in wikipedia. This has nothing to do with Catholic Church. What is my interest here? Nothing except promoting knowledge in general, as one can see from my edits on a variety of topics from biology and physical chemistry to history and politics.

0

5b10e261194be519

" He invented the Internet! In this conception of the ""matrix"", he predicted a worldwide communications network eleven years before the origin of the World Wide Web,[45] although related notions had been described elsewhere. As a big fan, and as a computer guy, I view this sentence as garbage. I want to take it out, and the reference to it in paragraph 1. It is irrelevant that the WWW spec was published 11 years later. People were telnetting and gophering long before the WWW. "

0

5b12d65a4de3f502

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dutch Golden Age, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

0

5b15c183b6d7b5c7

" Civility I don't think you deserve any civility, and your talk page/edit history goes a long way in showing that. You appear to be one of the worst kinds of Israelis/pro-Israel people you're even pro ""settler"". So no, I'm not going to worry about ""not treating you with civility"". "

0

5b160f4e15b6a058

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to George-Étienne Cartier. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' "

0

5b17acce8ab23800

I do not understand what I said that was not constructive.

0

5b18978a1992a679

BLP edits Will have a look at M'Lord's page, the blogoheadlines have shifted to the hitherto little known Harold Lewis who was a co-signatory with Fred Singer of a petition in June last year, and has now allegedly written a scathing resignation letter. Have put some bio source material at BLPN , it's been semi'd but a generally reasonable editor has added the letter sourced to El Reg. Not everyone thinks that's a good source for anything, too late for me tonight and rather busy tomorrow. . , talk

0

5b18eef20c91c18b

I'm desperately trying to avoid breaking WP:3RR here! According to the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here), 'three new episode titles' will be revealed in DWM issue 380. As this isn't officially on sale until 1 March 2007, please refrain from adding links and/or articles for Blink (Doctor Who), The Sound of Drums (Doctor Who), Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) (the latter two currently redirect to List of Doctor Who serials) or any similar titles. Please revert your edits to the Series 3 section of List of Doctor Who serials. Thank you.

0

5b1b2b4b32479d50

It has nothing to do with Qawwali but so is the case of Marsiya and Ghazal. Marsiya is a Shia thing and they would be very offended if it is referred to as Qawwali, something they do not approve.

0

5b1c82b0378047f5

I confess I recently climbed the Reichstag dressed as Batman, is this allowed?

0

5b27212e969beb2c

" OTOH, it's not likely to be desirable to leave this ""open"" while the NC subpage allegedly reaches a consensus (this has been rolling around for months already, and could do for who-know-how-long), then then goes to CFR. "

0

5b2777cee9c19b4e

Military Importance Any references to this? Or can it be deleted, because w/o the reference it isn't verifable.

0

5b31d28a52538002

Deletion query Hello! Question regarding the deletion of Solar Photovoltaic Academic Research Consortium, it was flagged for copyright issues and I posted a note on the talk page that I was the orignator and copyright holder of the information on the page in question, can you please undelete and mark this as ok, or is a significant rewrite required? Thanks.

0

5b359fb7079cd71a

" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Twenty20. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. || talk "

0

5b379714f150bcde

hi what up bugs baseball bugs private website and User:Baseball Bugs having fun!]] the acitivities of the pro vietnamese gouc Dave1185 Dave1185 private website and User:Baseball Bugs having fun!]]

0

5b3a5a2bce1e4736

Ok Got it! Thanks!

0

5b3f8a5243e4e455

And... I don't care =] Block me. Idiot

1

0

5b470019b6691af8

i apologize for making such rude comments. Erik Thompson.

0

5b47403854619de2

| decline=Take a hike, idiot!

1

0

1

0

5b4c4c4b4c8844af

Legends Field The official dedication has not yet taken place and is still referred to as Legends Field. This article is inaccurate

0

5b4ff5a569c895e3

Marital Infedelities Recently I watched a documentary on King. What is here only a few lines, was about 10 mins of a 2 hour doco. Dr King had many affairs with many women. Often (if memory serves) more than one woman at a time. This is a significant point, as it is is often used to discredit King, and it deserves more than the few lines that it gets here. Riff

0

5b57134b06be88ce

Unspecified source for Image:S5300014.JPG Thanks for uploading Image:S5300014.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ''''''

0

5b5a11d79b048a19

^Why do you use such poor grammar?

0

5b61fb6ce10d59de

"Our Company the ""Company"": www.ultimatewater.net Ultimate Water & Coffee is the leading provider of drinking water solutions, cleaning supplies and ""Full Break Room Solutions"" to businesses. We feature thousands of products ranging from water filtration systems and full coffee service to paper towels, hand soap and Lysol. Ultimate Water & Coffee brings over 20+ years of industry experience to businesses in your area. Currently we service over 9,000 customers in Florida. In today's economy, small businesses and Fortune 500 customers are looking for greater value, convenience and smart solutions. Our Mission & Vision: We strive to be the best but not the largest. We deliver quality. Our niche is to provide businesses with the purest glass of drinking water. best tasting coffee cup and a wide selection of product delivery while saving money-guaranteed. Here is how it works: we deliver distilled-quality water through our new, patented water filtration systems. Such systems are connected to our new, patented coffee machines coupled with premium coffee beans and GREEN products the final result is the best cup of coffee. That is spelled QUALITY. Take The Challenge Experience The Difference, Absolutely FREE!* No Cost, No Obligation www.ultimatewater.net Interested in Ultimate Water Products and Service? Please call us at 1-561-586-2077 or email us."

0

5b660bb7a0beafe9

The difference between those 2 links is that I have not yet evaluated one (westfieldnj.com), but I have the other (westfield-online.com). You see, I keep on my watchlist thousands of articles that I have edited, and I monitor changes to those articles. New changes catch my attention much more quickly than existing content. I noticed the change you made to the Westfield NJ article, saw that the link was affiliated with or otherwise connected to the other links you have added (veotag) and removed it as such (per guidelines regarding spamming). Just because I haven't gotten around to checking out westfieldnj.com yet doesn't mean I feel it should stay. If you think that the westfieldnj.com is also not appropriate for the article, feel free to remove it yourself if you'd like. (talk)

0

5b668f47dc9862d9

I agree, could someone please put it on Wiki page and then protect it again? caffolote 19:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

0

5b6bdf8432d0e845

" There are some in the LCMS who are opposed to scouting, and instead operate a separate ""Ranger/Rangerette"" program. The WELS are not the only ones. Boy Scouts prohibit Trinitarian statements (as they would make the non-Trinitarians in the group antagonized.) are also have a large number of Mormons active in the leadership. "

0

5b6dbb14f0950949

An editor should be careful and specific about which edits are thought to be not NPOV before reverting another editor's hard work wholesale. For example, what is not NPOV about stating that Candace was killed at a home in Evergreen and not in Golden? Because it happens to be the geographical location of a lot of leading attachment therapists? The therapists (plural) were not clearly unlicensed, as a reliable source has stated otherwise. It is POV to insist upon mistaken and misleading information be included, especially when the inclusion serves no good purpose. It is a settled question that a reliable source about a topic can be listed in a reading section. Besides, I didn't list it in the first place. The reversion is to a version which is, in my opinion, hopelessly inaccurate, biased and POV. Reversions to that version should stop.

0

5b6eed220142dac5

Your messages. I am sorry but what are you talking about?

0

5b6fbcb1b4c2b33d

" Go out in a blaze of glory...on my own talk page??? No, that's not my intention at all. It's a very small venue to go out on, I can assure you. My intention is simply to tell the truth. Even if it hurts. On that, I don't compromise. If that appears suidical to you, it's a sad indictment on the frequency of truth telling in you neck of the woods. Others compromise on truth, often because they care about $$$ more than truth. That's what I believe motivates the deletions on WP and elsewhere regarding monetary reform. That's why this stuff isn't EVER published in ""mainstream"" sources. This stuff is starved of funds until it dies. People who care about $$$ more than truth hate people pointing this out to them. Because it hurts. It shows they aren't very smart, but they are very selfish. It's as simple as that. One other thing. Wealth distribution is a separate and distinct issue from the issue of money creation and distribution. They are related and they do interact, but they are distinct issues. Many Libertarians (such as Ron Paul) couldn't care less about wealth distribution provided the way in which money creation is just and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution. Free markets can determine wealth distribution - provided the way in which money is created is open and democractically approved and ""just"" and the product of rational discussion (i.e. not based on the threat of a bullet to the head if you question the current method of money creation and distribution). Once new money is created, it gets gets circulated according to the tax laws, and competition laws, and finance laws and a multitude of other factors, and ends up in someone's account somewhere. Money creation is (arguably) much more important and has many more dynamic implications for an economy than wealth distribution, which is a separate issue. Again, this confusion shows that the level of understanding of these issues is woeful and I despair at ever increasing the general public's understanding of these vitally important issues, especially given the limitless $$$s financing the countervailing forces (Gregalton, Zenwhat, etc) that are lined up against anyone questioning the sustainability and pointing out the absolute stupidity of the current debt-based system. "

0

5b7674c4043b1d11

" History of Doctor Who‎ Greetings, I trust your opinions on all pages of Doctor Who, so I wonder if you could help resolve an issue over a section title in ""History of Doctor Who‎"". An anonymous IP keeps entering into an edit war over it, resulting in recent protection being applied. No agreement was reached over a title change so I reverted it back to what it was (A New Era) but the IP came back and reverted it again! We need a majority verdict on the title, whether it stays as ""A New Era"" or is changed to his suggestion of ""Taking Chances"". Cheers "

0

5b793d2833f6fc3d

McCain has often made slef-deprecating remarks, as well as remarks that show considerable humility; such remarks sound very different coming from him than they do from anyone else, and I think we're on much firmer ground relying on secondary sources than his own words.

0

5b794b68bb9b7c5a

Blackberry I think the article about Canadian Economy could include a picture of a Blackberry, the most famous manufactured product of Canada today, just to show that Canada is not based only in Energy and Agriculture. Also a picture of a Bombardier high speed train would be interesting...83.35.183.14

0

5b7e64b7207ff0a6

Thanks! What now? Hey , it's me again. I flew around the world but now I'm back on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for adding the information to the article. What do we do now though? What if someone wants to check the source themselves, how will they know where to go?

0

5b8628473d4b8558

Wait, what? How does this work? 65.200.64.163

0

5b88bf49301a4e10

What the heck i have a family of 2000 that i must support. if i get money in the form of cash i will not die of the bubonic plague. my address is 100 suck my lane Bangkok Vietnam. i swear if i dont get the money my mother will call me a nubkin. I have a friend called jeremy and he is also my boyfriend:). All i want for christmas is mariah carey in a blanket. Barbara rochon plays tennis with Charly who plays the eukalalay professionaly and she hates america.

0

5b8a4c8f9acf24ce

(forgot the Coast Guard)

0

5b8ab39bb600e231

GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Ironside/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: (talk · contribs) Will aim to get to this later in the week. Cheers,

0

5b8b213f15dfff3a

Solomon has added some more fuel to the fire, and good for him. Great article on April 26th about some more of the shenanigans going on on this topic. Link is here: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/04/26/the-real-climate-martians-solomon.aspx

0

5b902996997bc9cd

" This IGN piece just sources from Serebii which means it also cannot be used.— (琉竜) "

0

5b996106f48e93eb

" No, I FUCKING REWROTE THE WHOLE ARTICLE already (first as an anomymous user). It was ""a mess of the article"", before I did, starting last year or early this year, I don't remember. I provided most of reception, I rewrote most of everything else. Hello? "

1

0

1

0

5ba113943acb7a0e

" Assessments Thank you for adding template tags on WikiProject Environment articles. Try consider Outriggr's tool to assess article class. After that, I will reward you the Environmental Barnstar. If you have questions on how to assign class of articles, please don't hesitate to contact me. Talk page "

0

5ba48943289d03c6

" I was the one who originally wrote the plot summary and requested it be cleaned up because I wasn't happy with how it flowed in an ""emcyplopedia"" format. It appears a lot better now, and if you want to remove the tag, by all means, go ahead. "

0

5ba74256d8171ed1

I said nothing about Redwatch. What I said was that it is not reasonable to compare Harry's Place to it, and that no significant body of opinion has done so. No use making the argument here. You go out and find a significant body of opinion and the article can report their opinion. That's really all there is to say on the matter. . fys aym.

0

5ba90a9215b0473c

82ASK Hi Arglebargle IV I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia pages, so am a bit confused as to why my changes to the 82ASK entry keep on getting blocked. I basically work on behalf of 82ASK and have been tasked with updating company information to Wikipedia. I have followed all NPOV guidelines and have not included anything salesy. So please, please, please, reconsider my changes. Thanks raxraxrax

0

5bafdf6d7d14e460

"You should not talk of ""misrepresentation"" if your entire ""knowledge"" on the matter stems from online ideological pamphlets, while you wouldn't recognized an academic source if it was shoved in your face. Go and edit some blog, but stop pestering Wikipedia with your naive nonsense. "

0

5bb2267b3db9b200

" ""The LORD said to Moses, ""Cut two stone tablets like the former, that I may write on them the commandments which were on the former tablets that you broke."" So who's writing the commandments? God. ""And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten words."" Who's writing the covenant? Moses. Sure, you can present an exegesis that results in the conclusion that they are the same. But the plain text of the Bible does not clearly establish that they are the same. That's what I mean by taking the Bible at face value. Exegesis should not be presented as fact. This is an encyclopedia of facts, not of intrepretation. Clearly, you are the one insisting on not being neutral, writing that this is the ""correct"" interpretation and reverting my edit which do not, as you imply, assert a different interpretation, but merely point out that the Bible is not clear on this matter. Your edits are based entirely on what YOU SAY the Bible means, not what the Bible actually says. You're in violation of NPOV no matter what, but unless you can present a reputable source giving your interpretation, you're also in violation of NOR."

0

5bb35bdb16998d5e

" WTF?! want != need Obviously, the idiot that wrote ""the need for instant gratification"" failed economics 101. A need is something you must have for survival; that isn't instant gratification. A want is something that you would like to have but can live without. The guy that edited this is probably a consumerist moron with thousands in credit card debt. Debtors are fools that shouldn't be allowed to own anything. This is why a fully market economy can't end poverty. Only those with a proper education should be allowed to participate in a market economy. Fools that don't know the difference between a want and a need should be owned by their employer. Their employer can better determine what they need than themselves. Poverty would be eliminated by this mix of a command and market economies. The remaining unemployed, fat, and lazy fools can go to jail. I am now going to correct the article because I'm a genius and the previous editor is not. 76.178.252.151 "

1

0

5bb5b9bdf9d3ca5f

As I already said, I have provided diffs, and you have simply lied about what is in them. So clearly providing diffs is of no value.

0

5bb73a203067cd08

Oh yes, missed that, I was searching for SEPP

0