id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
73de058fa17673a5 | "
Someone keeps erasing this with no comment to me...very unethical.
( minutes after posting this it was erased) check it out. this is very suspicious and unethical by the parties involved. senior management (if in existence) asked to investigate)
````Please do not block me for trying to improve the integrity of the article.
Hello, My name is JohnHistory. I was recently blocked for my mentioning of major problems here because I did not assume ""Good Faith"" when confronted with bad faith. I believe that the biggest problem with this article and thus the best way to improve it is to intensely follow the Jimbo guidelines to the T. I am going to post what I wrote on my talk page after being blocked during the controversy here. I could be more covert in my contempt for violations especially given my long but yet humble ranking amongst the Wiki Elite but abusing editors and monitors must be accountable or we will always suffer from their petty tyranny. This surely does not make me popular amongst them, yet I must assume ""good faith"" in them so that they will not prejudice their views against me and comfort their own politics in the process.
I was accused of supporting things I never did. All I ask is that criticism be included on par with other presidents. That is all. I don't especially care about Rev Wright, etc but if it is historical record and part of historically long campaign then I will stick my neck out for it.
I have to say that the amount of bashing of media and talk that has nothing to do with improving the article is highly tolerated if it is left leaning but anything even center of that is treated with heavy hand and often banished and erased. that is what struck me about the discussion page - mind you I never made an edit on the actual article I was banned for merely talking on a talk page. it was the idea that these so called monitors are in fact just random non scholars at home abusing the tools of wikipedia to further their almost personal agenda in a group- think environment.
Thin skin is no excuse for being literally fascistic in your approach to the open to the public - controlled by a small group of ideologues - Wikipedia. These political minding ideologues are 80-100% dominated by left wing or leaning people and controlled through even the excessive use of blocking for discussion posts and factual additions. These (not just mine) are non threatening non- offensive language - just the idea of one stating that their is a problem with the editors and monitors is cause to be blocked and potentially banned for not ""assuming good faith"" or ""positively contributing to the consensus"". what if the consensus is wrong then? What if about if you have already assumed Good Faith long ago and are simply diagnosing the major illness of the article as you see it? The evidence is more then abundant that these monitors are violating their tools and are involved in subterfuge or at least strong bias as evidenced between comparing Obama with W Bush. Additionally, the Obama Administration through proxies, in my strong opinion, is at work in the Obama article. I say this mainly because it is inconceivable to me that given the current administrations use and celebration of all things internet and aggressive pursuit of media outlets and shaping the publics opinion (as is understandable) that someone out of the thousands of Obama connected likely people is not involved on the Barack Obama page. It is the most visited page on Wikipedia and is one of the top hits for people searching the internet for the name Barack Obama. However, that is secondary to the already abundant supply of ideologue editors and monitors who seem to fill the demographic of the wikipedia junior officer ranks who enough of is all that it really takes. The number of those is in the millions. That is Why Jimbo guidelines must be followed as an example of the integrity of wikipedia as a REAL encyclopedia that could stand out in a scholarly work. The language given the Rulers of Wikipedia gives them broad ability to block and ban anyone they disagree with. OFten the language is contradictory. For instance I was blocked for my comments on the TALK page and cited for ""Making a point instead of wanting to edit"". How, exactly, do you make a TALK page based discussion about edits without making a point? Another monitor told me I had to assume good faith, yet no good faith was given to me in my quest to improve article. In addition, the ""TALK"" page says no writing will be allowed that involves ""general discussion"" however that can be loosely interpreted and it could for instance only be 5% of what you wrote and then be grounds by a prejudiced monitor to remove your entire sections containing many posts. Additionally, the last guideline about general talk is only applied to people making comments critical or potentially scandalous to the President of the United stat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73dec14cd205918b | May not be a insult but still name calling Kepp it up and you will be blocked. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73e700ab358733f9 | ", you're infringing owner B. However if picture A is out of copyright you can take your picture C of it, and picture C is your copyright. Which I think is why art galleries ban cameras - they want to sell you their postcards (I think this is right)
""Exactly Chevin"", Thanks...Watch out Boothy doesn't start staulking and deleteing your stuff w/o taking the burden of proof there is a copyright...
Which picture? Incidentally I'm writing about UK law. American law used to be marginally different. For instance to have copyright in the UK you only have show your work to someone, whereas in America I think you have to send it to the Library of Congress - books anyway. Also you used to have claim copyright separately in different countries. Then there's publishing rights, a whole different can of worms.
I think that a picture such as Image:Pottsville court house.gif is liable to be a double copyvio - of the original postcard (if still in copyright) and of the gif image.
General. I am not sure why Scott and Boothy have put this lot on my talk page. I am watching and will give my considered opionion in due course. 17:50:48, 2005-08-20 (UTC)
Rollback?
Hi there! Could you please explain why you rollbacked this? The category was earlier deleted via CFD process. adiant_>|< 12:33, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Aren't you supposed to clear a category before you delete it? I have edited the cat taking my precedent from here. In my defence, I would say that {{db|see [[CfD debate]]}} would have been better than {{deleteagain}} which has a rather vague may have undergone a vote for deletion here - note the missing link. And after ten minutes of hunting I cannot actually find the original CfD debate. But I am not dsperately bothered - if you want to delete it straight away, feel free - but do provide a link to the CfD debate. 13:55:01, 2005-08-23 (UTC)
Paleoparadoxia
Paleoparadoxia Coming along nice. Regards, Scott
More Pics
""The footpath sign was a result of an abortive attempt to photograph the south portal of the Milford Tunnel - I did not think the golfers would take kindly to my walking across their fairways and I am not sure how else to get to it."" When I went train spotting, I used to walk along the edge of the field at the opposite side off the Milford Road, opposite the signal box. The North Portal is said to be prettier and you seem to have caught it in a rare moment when it wasn't deep in shade. I like 058133 - the train gives it a bit of movement.
There are loads of photos around but they are all copyright. My solution is to link to websites that are lkely to be permanent. ""Picture the Past"" has a photo of Toadmoor Tunnel which really shows the elliptical shape.
058162 would show Ambergate station as it is now. Belper and Duffield have been similarly erased.
I'm sure I should know what Chatter is. I have this feeling it's limestone pebbles from the quarries that you'd use for a driveway. I'll have to ask around, or perhaps we could ask on the ""Voices"" BBC programme that's coming up.
Are the other images mentioned at http://www.rhaworth.me.uk/4val/058-/buxton05.htm available for GFDL uploading? The Buxton article could certainly use a picture of the cresent.
Rob Vincent
Why did you remove the speedy tag from Rob Vincent? I do not see anything in that article as it stands that looks like a claim of notability to me. Also it appears that you used the admin rollback tool. As I understand it, this is only supposed to be for vandalism. My addition of the speedy tag was in good faith, and in no way vandalism, even if you disagree with it. I have been fairly active on new page patrol and on VfD, and I was active in the debates on the creation of WP:CSD criterion A7. I created . I have also been consistant in advocating strict application of the CSD, not favoring speedy tags on undesireable articles that do not quite meet the criteria. I have made this point several times on VfU and VfD. So I don't think my speedy tags shoul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73e9379f5ec0dacc | I dopnt' care about what you concerned about. What I am concerned is that nobody reasonable cared to see what really happens here. In addition to insanity and disruption I have a third, even better, hypothesis: since two deletion nominations of this guy were overwhelmingly rejected, he now deliberately sabotages the article by adding nonsense, so that during the third monination the article will be killed. `'Míkka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73f15bf3d13c28de | Hi
I'm just curious, I'm wondering what kicks you get out of interfering in others work. I mean, you have absolutely no life (Kinda like the guy in the South Park World of Warcraft parody, you sure look like him) Does this constant obsession in doing geeky things, like interfering in Wikipedia and collecting Fire alarms offer your life some purpose? How about you go to the gym, cut down on Mc Donalds and get liposuction. Do something about them mantits too, like working on freeweights which build your upper body muscles. Cheers, and please take this advice seriously, I worry just as much as anyone about this obesity epidemic we face in the west. 82.141.202.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73f7233aef181b0c | .98.62]] 20:27, 8 August | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73fcdbf774ce1e40 | "
According to this press release, the terms aren't synonymous. This Telegraph article and a few others like it suggest that ""Chronophage"" is used by Dr Taylor only to refer to the escapement mechanism (the grasshopper), which is one part of the Corpus Clock as a whole. However, MatthewVernon has a point - the whole thing is frequently called the Chronophage. I've been guilty of that myself. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
73ff831a51dc1620 | Speedy deletion criterion A1 didn't apply; I tagged the page for A7 speedy deletion instead. — Talk/Stalk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
740c0a05f34fffc3 | I added a because the football club Zakynthos F.C. has two names. It is also called A.P.S Zakynthos . In Zakynthos F.C. page in wiki we have added an unofficial page for the fans of the club. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
740f13af748bb015 | "
Facts are often disputed. What we actually tend to do here is provide sources POVs from all sides, and describe that as NPOV. The way to NPOV this article is to find some sort of credible organization or news agency that describes the JCPS as a ""hasbara organization"". I note that the JCPS does quite a number of different things, so even if some of its reports were hasbara oriented, others clearly have nothing whatsoever to do with hasbara. Calling it a ""hasbara organization"" could never be more than a POV simpliciation. I urge you to actually study what the JCPA does. 04:09, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Secondly, to anyone who may think that I'm just out to demonise Jews, or Israel, or Jayjg, or just to join Alberuni in some sort of POV-warring, note that I do not support Alberuni's insertion of Category:Propaganda into Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. I guarantee that my intent at all times is to ensure that this project and its articles are as NPOV as possible. 03:47, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Your longstanding harrassment of and attacks on me, and your consistent policy violating reverts on this page without accompanying reasoning backing them up, bely the claim that you are not out to ""demonise"" me or joining Alberuni in POV-warring. If you want to show some good faith, respond on the article content to me, rather than just attacking me personally and rather pointedly responding on article content only to Viriditas. 04:09, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74118d1fecf15cb5 | Interesting that you readily accept sources which show plagiarism and conjecture as adequate for wikipedia such as the stated references and readily reject legal documentary reliable invention proposal evidence that even shows the intended patent classifications, both international patent classification and USA paten classification. My question then is what is wikipedia's standard for what is a verifiable reliable source? Thus far, plagiarism and conjecture sources seem to be the acceptable sources. Something wrong with that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
741a1d0cf5a20191 | "
Gee, I recall saying there that the cited sources don't work. Hmmm...I wonder how you missed THAT? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7429e7bee69143cc | Talk:Co-Freemasonry
I left the message there, but I failed to see what you were trying to argue with your points at the bottom. Not that I'm trying to side against you, I'm just trying to understand the point of the argument so I can provide feedback. Thanks. Ardenn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
742fe607d1d81670 | Ted Cruz is a gun rights advocate.
And here is my source: http://www.nra.org/Article.aspx?id=15654
I am adding him to that category. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
743a92d442153092 | "
I personally think the members of Metallica are against war. If you hear their early songs such as ""One"" you will see they are against war and how it affects people. Lars Ulrich did in fact speak out against the war, so I doubt they support what Savage is doing. Look up some old Metallica lyrics dealing with war, you will see they are pretty much opposed to it. As for Rammstein, the vocalist has stated they do not have political beliefs, though they seem to lean left. Look at the lyrics to the song ""Amerika"" and you will see they are kinda poking fun at America and American culture. I think this should be looked into." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74483537a594c662 | Request for Closure
I request consensus to close this RfC. It's been significantly less than 30 days, however, there has been a high degree of participation with ample discussion and it's clear (IMO) there will not be a consensus to delete the passage in question. Does anyone object? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
744fdafa857c8836 | No, not happening. You've convinced no one and are ignoring the multiple, irredeemable problems that have been raised with your edit. I encourage you to give this up now and move on. You will not succeed in this misguided effort, and you run the risk of being blocked if you pursue it via an edit war.— | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74500016b4b364d4 | "
First could you please post with an account replying to an ip nummber isnt good
Also the Axis nummber seems a bit high.
All I know is that prof Richard Overy went into the Soviet archives after the fall of the Soviet Unnion and those are the nummbers he reached.
Maybe your nummbers are Soviet posted nummbers before the fall of the Soviet Unnion and therefore are a bit wrong.
These are the nummbers I have on both sides and the sources are stated bellow
I also made the graphs arent they lovely D
+ Military Losses On The Eastern Front During World War 2.1 Forces Fighting FOR the Soviet UnionTotal DeadPOW Taken By The AxisPOW That Died In CaptivitySoviet 8,668,0006,000,0004,000,000Poland2 40,000UnknownUnknownRomania3 17,000UnknownUnknownTotal 8,725,000UnknownUnknown
+ Military Losses On The Eastern Front During World War 2.1 Forces Fighting FOR the AxisTotal DeadPOW Taken By The SovietsPOW That Died In CaptivityGreater Germany 2,415,9604,500,000500,000Soviet Turncoats4 2,000,000UnknownUnknown
Romania 381,000UnknownUnknownHungary 136,000UnknownUnknownItaly 84,830UnknownUnknownBulgaria 32,000UnknownUnknownTotal 5,049,790UnknownUnknown
1 All nummbers are taken from
A: The Swedish Translation of ""Campaigns of World War II Day by Day"" which is written by Chris Bishop and Chris Mcnab, pages 244-252
B: Russia's War by Prof. Richard Overy , page 238" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7453a89b94ec22f0 | Edit request from , 8 October 2011
Please remove {{pp-semi-indef}} from line two, so that this doesn't appear at Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates.
(talk | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7459f4532fe90e2f | 04:59, 22 Au | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
745f048ecc0f1aee | Dchall, what is your problem. You want to say more Romas died than Serbs? LoL! I wanted to say that after albanians mostly Serbs died you removed it, even if it's a fact. I gave back number more than 3,200 only by KLA forces and please don't remove it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
745f8b6657fdba82 | "
Post-It notes/ Sticky notes article
You're perfectly correct, a redirect does make more sense. What I was attempting was to npov ""Post-It Notes"" away from being about post-it brand notes, and transfer the article to ""Sticky notes"", the generic term. However, my redirect was misidentified by ClueBot as vandalism due to the large amount of material being moved (or deleted, as in cluebot's eyes)79.97.166.36 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
746596d2665cecbe | "
Come on now, forgive me and forget the incident. You dont have be so angry ""Jamie"". Havent I promised that there will be no future attacks and vandalism." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
746756a252aeb492 | It's probably worth including both scenarios, rather than assuming protons do decay. While most of our present attempts at a grand unified theory require that they do, nothing in actual experiments has confirmed this (just put larger and larger thresholds on what its lifetime must be). Far-future predictions based on both scenarios have been published, so I'd argue that both are equally notable at this point. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7469d7de4d740d6b | Why is this person allowed to use profanity insult multiple editors and revert war multiple editors, engage in distruptive conduct (by deleting peoples contibution and putting their articles up for deletion) STALKING editors and and in engaging in deragatory and inflaming conduct and you can DO NOTHING? He just showed again in the derogatory comments he left on my talkpage that there is no working out a resolve either be a doormat or leave is his message. When will sometyhing be done? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
746af80b681812a0 | ==Small minded fascist++
Since you're a small minded nerd who can't move we'll leave it. How pitiful little sausages are like you - nothing better to do so 150,000 edits later you've a power crazed hunger to delete. - get a life eh! get out more. And it was the real Peter Wynne Thomas - who's a pile of foolishness now - bless | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
747687cc74ec587a | "
Ok, so when in doubt, point to the botany version seems to be the rule! The only one you'd missed, I think, was Pfiesteria piscicida.
Now the task is to try to sort out the articles on botanical nomenclature, so that there is a page ""specific name (botany)"" to link to (or perhaps a section of an article). At the moment I'm just trying to understand what articles there are and how they interconnect. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7476cb39808b5fb3 | "
I'm sure you meant ""suspicions"", so therefore, I am guilty, is that what I'm hearing? What is a ""sockpuppet""? According to WP, ""A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception."" I am an IP, and prefer to be an IP, because I do not like false identities - like user names. You (as Pinkadelica), Ylee and all others who use names other than their own, are the true ""sockpuppets"". It allows you to snitch, make false assumptions and claim the sky is falling, all because you will not be held accountable for your mistakes in the real world. What does any of this have to do with SWAT and Charles Whitman? As I pointed out in bold letters above, Swat was created as a result of the Watts Riots of 1965, almost a year before Whitman. That is not to say that Whitman would not be used later for techniques on how to deal with his type of scenario in the future, but Whitman was unknown to John Nelson and Daryl Gates in 1965. The ""notable events"" mentioned in the paragraph in the article, came after Whitman, but SWAT was fully funded and implemented at those times. Whitman was not a factor in 1965, nor the ""Black Panthers"", ""SLA"" or any other SWAT related issues. Is Whitman used by SWAT as a teaching method? I know he is. There are other events that preceeded Whitman, that are taught as well. The reference to SWAT in the Whitman article, is a misplaced reference, created by mis-informed sources. Now excuse me - my ""new hobby"" is calling.2001:558:6007:27:7992:7DA3:D702:EE6A " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
747785c7ccb253c8 | "
Let solve this with voting
Anyway, we all can vote to solve this dispute. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
747865486ef4ca86 | I do not think this is a vanity page. It seems to be a general article about gangstas and the gangsta culture. Looking at the history it seems that the link to that myspace was inserted before the rightfully placed information about gangstas and their idealisms and habits.
Normal vandalism ensued afterwards (eg pov) 'He is a 'G' at bball'
and the link to myspace.
I think it would be best to leave the information about gangstas themselves and remove any personal information about myspaces and particular 'Gangstas' ;) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74788a3586c3fc7a | Fascism
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74877cc649bdd496 | Help! Help me perform Autofellatio! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7489807048409f8b | "*Oppose. ""For modern country names, The World Factbook maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency is current and continuously updated,"" per WP:NCGN. This source gives the name of the country as ""Taiwan.""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
748aa22f588a49fb | hahahahahahahahahahahaha take that for banning us u all amell i hate wikipedia anyways so go ahead and bann me i dont care hahahahahahahahahahahahaha | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7492e3d8ae19ed2b | Your userbox was deleted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7495a098bf227dd6 | "
Not necessarily. In Australia (and also in some other places, eg Ireland), the term ""railcar"" is used to refer to both of these types of trains. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74977d248bbfb4d4 | Røyse is not a municipal center in Hole but the name of the peninsula that represents a major part of the municipality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7497f9058cab9804 | Prithviraj III grave?!
Where is it?! take a photo of it! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
749f5e5adee24584 | Johnpedia
You don't have an impact on me. Keep checking my page for updates.The internet is a very special and important place.It is much more real than real life, and is a good tool when real life doesn't work. Always be right. love | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74aa036d0fa643c1 | What the hell? Who determines whether or not it's notable? It's a single in Aus and Can, it continues a saga of a mini series of songs. I guess this isn't an encyclopedia that anyone can edit if everything is just burned down by imbeciles. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74ab5bff9238211c | "
Pathetic Firefox fanboys
The feature comparison tables clearly state that they're about features supported natively and without third-party extensions. Yet, for every ""No"" in Firefox's row there must be a stupid, pedantic little note saying ""such-and-such is supported by installing this or that extension"". Firefox fanboys, could you please be a little less pathetic? " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74af24d8186ae8a0 | "
Wrong tagging for speedy deletion
Hi . Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted you to inform that I declined to delete We're In Yr. Corner, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G1 because of the following concern: Page is not patent nonsense. G1 clearly excludes poor writing as a reason for deletion. Also, you should almost never tag something for deletion if an admin already declined it (newly discovered copyright violations are the only exception). Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or file them at articles for deletion. Regards Why " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74b4396585f3124e | You should read the external linking policy. (t|c|||) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74b441d4f552f971 | "
Well it seems that even providing a reference, some cunt has ""blocked me from editing"". It gives further evidence to the dishonesty, unintelligence, and desire to suppress information which I expounded on ""Jimbo's"" page.
Here is the reference for ""pussy pelmet"" I gave.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/under-the-counter-with-lindsay-calder-1251446.html
The block was for ""disruptive editing"", clearly this is a lie, or if an honest mistake, it is made by someone of extremely low intelligence.
If you can give an alternative believable explanation I'd like to here it." | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74ba0b7e6fc322e4 | May 2008
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74bab9b2c1a46d5f | I find GoogleBooks very handy, for giving me an idea of whether it's worth getting hold of the actual book or not. Fatuorum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74c915dac6c6c97c | "
I personally do not see the problems with ""result"" and ""relative"", which just seem simpler and less ambiguous words to me than ""function"" and ""differential"". And I do not see why you simply reverted all the attempts to make the word order better. But in any case we have to find some way to make this sentence better, surely? It is too long and complex. Behold: Natural selection is the gradual natural process by which biological traits become either more or less common in a population as a function of the effect of inherited traits on the differential reproductive success of organisms interacting with their environment. Can we split this up for example? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74ce968350c8bfb5 | "
Supremacist?
Is it so important for the wikijews to brand this dude a ""supremacist"" that it must be mentioned in the very first sentence?!
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74cff159e2f194f9 | "
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
→Toth " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74d04227171c02b8 | Gmaxwell, are you an agent of Encarta or Brittanica, seeking to harass Wikipedia editors to the point they quit, and so the project dies? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74d19038aa3400f3 | Image:Tierradentro.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tierradentro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74d4bb0402bf5cf7 | Please give me a second chance and unblock me. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74d85bf30e5352a1 | "
Honestly, I wouldnt have posted the article in the first place if I had known it had been posted & debated fairly before. As you can see I am a new user. If Fiddle had pointed this out in the first place instead of simply insulting my work, then we wouldnt even have to be having this discussion. Certainly you can agree that my actions were not vandalism. We can disagree on content, but posting what I thought was a relevant article could not be considered vandalism by even the broadest definition. That said, knowing (ex-post) that this article has been posted & debated previously, I see no need to re-post it. If we all treat each other fairly instead of assuming harmful intentions, the community as a whole will certainly benefit. I also think that Fiddle could benefit from some feedback on how to work with new users instead of immediately addressing their work as ""rubbish.""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74dab1aa815875bc | The last two comments were actually directed at the ones who invited admins to take over for them. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74dedc935bac8408 | Contributions:
Added much info to Sellersville Pennsylvannia
Authored Transgenic Plant Production | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74e42dfda3979cee | are you a sock, we need 100px as god template image | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
74e5dbd01875d6ba | "
Wikipedia:Category titles
...now has a straw poll. Please give your opinion. adiant_>|< 09:50, August 4, 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74e6054829f79bb6 | Since you fail to recognize facts, I am forced to tell you the facts.
Here the section break is above Lobojo's post dated .
Then here you inserted the same section break but this time above Law Lord's post dated .
In other words, you did not restore anything but rather inserted a new break in the middle of everything.
If your only contribution is inserting empty section breaks like here, you should not contribute at all. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74e8e5ef0ab041f1 | Not sure, however my guess is he won't, since he is the Sovereign Prince of Monaco. The Monaco government & people may not want their monarch risking his life. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74ea1ba0e0191784 | "
cause of death
The speed of his death after dissolution of the proposed regime is notable, and kidney failure is readily caused by poisoning. Is there no further discussion of cause of death in the literature? – + " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74f05dbca945574b | "
""antagonist""
How is Goldilocks, or the owld woman for that matter, an ""antagonist""? This is needlessly artificial. Goldilocks is clearly the protagonist. (𒁳) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74f1aec759b3e1bb | "And about Metzenberger and Homo SApiens, were the hell are they? I see that after puting there photo they took of from here (To remind you, the one who started atacks against my photo was Homo Sapians, for me ""daring"" to say he's not the boss). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74f33975865d5a93 | Got your message re Tennis expert. As we all know, he's well capable of purging his talk page of anything negative, without any help from me (gender assumed). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74f9fe25ddb71364 | Listen, you better quit your non-sense. It is obvious as to who you are, and I will be more than happy to report you to the administrators again. PacificWarrior101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
74fc39fa1d645236 | Hi HG, good to hear from you. You have not provided the link to that article using [[ ]] All the best, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75077496e84e803d | added some more context information. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
750a5328ad88dbe2 | RoyBoy, forget Alienus, forget Rosenberg. This is about whether there was an NCI conspiracy (or whatever you'd prefer to label it) that would cause the findings of the 2003 expert workshop to be suspect. You start out claiming that you never thought nor claimed there was pro-abortion bias. If that's truly the case, I'd be happy to leave it at that. You end, however, by suggesting, yet again, there was a 2003 conspiracy, or if you like, politically motivated bias (over all of the 100+ experts except Brind). This would again be fine because, as shown above, it clearly was politically charged from the anti-abortion side. Then you try to take a swipe at the source that you had praised (but apparently didn’t bother to actually read) and that is written by a PhD in a University history department and is published on PubMed Central (nih.gov) even as anti-abortion politicians dominate every part of U.S. politics. You expect us to take your OR over a clearly more credible source? This is why I stated before I think you’ve lost yourself in this article. Whether intentional or not, you’re still essentially serving as Brind’s PR person. Again, forget Rosenberg. That's purely historical context that shows the one thing that you clearly agree with – it upset Brind. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
750f996146291293 | Your contributions begin to raise the question that you are not here to build an encyclopedia and when the block expires, I urge you to edit in other areas of the encyclopedia to avoid potentially being indefinitely blocked. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7510b9a63c6ee16b | develop a historical perspective on the | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
751906c734d4b3f4 | " (UTC)
Okay, thanks again for the reply. In order not to become an ""obsessive user"", I'll leave the conversation here, but I may stop by again sometime. 03:07, 2 January 2009" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
751970f5ed4f1c23 | and refuse to let rumors spread without source | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75239a60f073542b | "
Aww thanks -) from PC 28 at Stevenage library ;-) –projectors– " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
752aaf2ca0730d3f | Nazi discovery of hypothermia?
Is it not true that many of discoveries regarding hypothermia came from Nazi Germany's human experimentation? Should that be mentioned? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
752acddcc08b3bf2 | Oh dear. I thought Rex had finally gone, but no... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
752f2051d0ad94dc | cleanup
thanks for cleaning up all those spelling mistakes. cheers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7534b825eb52f6ab | Already have done mate ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7537e379d3400995 | "
'Non-Free Media what Doe's that Mean?
'why won't you leave my Userpage alone?
'P.S. Do you like ""Weird Al"" Yankovic
'P.s. is your name Jay
' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
753901d53d150c98 | I mean when a message I just wrote gets posted to the place where you just posted about the article where you just thanked me. If you see what I mean... ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7539ced6bd363e37 | Yes, I know she said it, it was on 5-14-07 but Melina said alot of things, all of which was not notable and what I meant by it was not true is that Candice is not fat! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
753a9de68a03c3aa | "
DYK
On 28 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nova Studios, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
753bf52530133007 | Don't take it personally, Sushilover boy. It seems that Wikipedians are out to get anything that slightly resembles an advertisement. I also am confused why editors don't give other users the benefit of the doubt. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
753fcebb5f83b50a | "
oldest Czech died
http://praguemonitor.com/2009/07/02/oldest-czech-dies-age-106
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7542a2ee27eaae86 | The data in the SAA and .38LC articles are very specific, there's no room for misinterpretation. One statement is false and since the one in this article is the least detailed I suspect it to be the false one. 84.163.235.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7543662a0cd1746a | "
MSM Article and transgender
Court case. A TG individual was deferred for donating blood. They objected and went to court. The court found that they could not defer the individual for being MSM because they were TG. They provide a M and an F box, and I would mark the F mark. Grats. They complain? I point out that my medical records declare me as female, and they cannot call me a ""man"" for the purposes of statistics. Your source states that TG were specifically not MSM, but were ""lumped in"" just 'cause. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75496eaa06871731 | So do ask a neutral user, but the facts are clear here, we don't use AINA as a source, no matter what. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
754c98d7e8b78e63 | I find Sandstein's dealing with the Mbz1 phenomenon very professional. He removed the soapbox image from that user's page and also banned you for not complying with your topic ban. It is you the one who is not assimilating the teaching of your topic ban. For example. You are topic banned because you don't have a professional approach to I-P topic and in general to any topic related to Jews and Judaism. The most resent example. When you reported that soapbox you qualified it as antisemitic. You at least should get informed of what that is. A neutral approach would be to have called it as soapbox canvasing and that's it. You should focus in your pictures which is the thing that you manage to do relatively well. Once you get into your holly war program of fighting all that in your imagination is an attack to Judaism you simply behave stupidly. It is those kinds of behaviors the ones that keep bringing hatred to us. That kind of attitude is, know it, racist, and if you are true to the struggles of the people of Abraham you above all should regret behaving as a racist. Once more, focus on your pictures and maybe even Sandstein will take a like on you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
754e483100bbbe2f | "
To quote the article, ""The nouns in this list are common nouns."" Qantas is not, it's a proper noun. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75656a54947fca63 | "
RE:Hidden Pages
Hi, Im keen on keeping these because I think that the next in line will be the signature pages. But I have given up, Ill post a comment on all of the pages with the exeption of MC. I realized that you all win and I dont hold a grudge so ill just forget about it. (with the exeption of MC s/he deserves to keep his/her due to the edits s/he has. Expert " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75748b64e2e56346 | "
I have never been ""blocked for disruptive editing."" If you're going to post on my user page, you will assume good faith and remain civil. Thank you. - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7582f0f612ae727e | Thank you very much ) It's nice to know others appreciate the article as much as I do. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
758471d210d02079 | "
From OED online: SHED: ""To separate, divide. Now only dial., chiefly in farming uses: To separate (lambs) from the ewes, or (calves) from the cows; to separate (cattle, sheep) from the herd or flock. to shed the shanks (Sc.): to set the legs apart."" The first date they have for this use is c.1000, but I can't read it. ." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75860d66593aa409 | Please also explain why stating somones religion is neutral?
Please also explain why stating somones denomination is neutral?
Please also explain why stating somones is a fundamentalist is not neutral? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
758be42cc6a106fd | YOU
ARE AN A...HOLE!!! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
758eb613f266a760 | "
October 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. •
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75948315fd6fa5b4 | 2008 (UTC)
Also thank you for understanding the delicate position for Don Talbot 06:55, 25 October | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7599e058d4f49ace | "
Accolades
Rather than get into an edit-war, I'll post my opinion here about the so-called ""accolades"". What we are talking about here is a nomination-for-a-nomination, not a nomination, and certainly not a win. How is this notable? -''''''The '45 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
759b33c8b5817ae1 | Why?
Regards;
Todd Nichols
July 15, 2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
759b8edd6c2f5de6 | "
Scorers listed in the table should be ranked alphabetically based on ties. The team name should not be used when a flag icon will do just fine. As for those outside the top 10, they should be lumped all together with flagicons used again and only be seperated by goals scored. That is the way every other article is done. .Alpaugh " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75a3a4dd58da4063 | "
That's a great quote, JakeInJoisey. One of the more entertaining comments (not to mention sad but true) I've seen in awhile. Well done. Talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75aab7834a1b1253 | Should we believe you? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.