tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
706d665c3d692613	\fuck you, who the shit is ari?	1	1	1	0
707b5510dfa06188	":::We'll have to agree to disagree (BTW AE's instructor's name is Neta Snook, not ""Anita""). This article is about Snook, part of which is Snook's frustrations with trying to create safe pilots where there are none. Some editors are leaning in the direction of whitewashing some of the training issues, and doing just that is contrary to traditional aviation training practices. The fact that some editors beat an argument to death doesn't mean that the issue has gone away. As long as there's aviation instructors reading this material, the issue still has legs, regardless of whether you think you've heard enough about it. I know it's a delicate subject, but the successful pilots are those who have never crashed a plane, and never become lost. Snook's job was to train such pilots. This article is still a delicate whitewash of one flight instructor's important mission and is totally unsatisfactory for just that reason. "	0	0	0	0
70863a9538d1660d	" Move? InterAcademy Panel on International Issues → InterAcademy Panel (IAP) – The original title is misleading because the organizations real name is simply InterAcademy Panel. International Issues is part of what the organization does but not the only thing. It is a ""Global Network of Science Academies"" and focuses more on scientific international issues, bringing world science academies together and helping them grow and contribute to global discussions. See www.interacademies.net/About.aspx The acronym should not be appended. The page title should be if this is the name of the organisation. Looking at their statutes, the name is indeed InterAcademy Panel, supporting the statement of MegaSloth. But I suggest to follow the ""Requesting a single page move"" procedure as explained underneath, so other people can be involved in the discussion. (messages) "	0	0	0	0
7086850396c149be	ZBD was the The Saviour in AC technology, because it had great 97-99% efficiency and shunt connection. And it was patented with a revolutionary new power distribution system. Before ZBD the AC had no real chance to rival with Edison's DC system.	0	0	0	0
7087a06c74ef0ca6	Please see WP:NOTFORUM. This talk page is intended solely for discussions directly related to article content, and is not a forum for general discussions relating to pornography.	0	0	0	0
70890cf26c2dd3ff	" Okay, I can go with the combined form of ""mudflow"". Gorthian, I presume you approve of the rename, as do I and Vsmith, and as urged by two other editors previously. There being no dissents, I will proceed with this tomorrow. I also have a new lead paragraph (sourced!) which I think will be a distinct improvement. ~ (talk) "	0	0	0	0
708e5857da1aa53d	In alternate or future history / fiction What movies have had Mount Rushmore altered with one or more future presidents? I seem to remember a black woman was added in some movie set in the year 2050 or something. 68.0.119.139	0	0	0	0
7091f7e667317836	" Etymology In regards to the South Slavic etymology, ""Koza"" means goat, and ""Koža"" means skin. It is called ""Kožani"" in Slavic so I don't believe the reference to goat is correct, although goatskin or just ""skin"" (as in leather) makes sense. Correct me if I'm wrong. Alex "	0	0	0	0
70990e503f69b2bc	I made those hiphop edits; my brother was on this computer earlier so he is probably the culprit; I will tell him to stop the vandalism. -	0	0	0	0
709a40d705e83ccd	" That is good idea - ""begets"" is Present Perfect and the inflected form ""begotten"" covers Past Participle. Please note that I did keep saying Past Present - its Present Perfect for something that happened in the past and is (or may be) still be going on. So ""neither begets nor was begotten"" is the one. "	0	0	0	0
709f7ec70db28206	Hi, found you ;') Where's this page? Ben	0	0	0	0
70aaa8d4b1300927	Mam i found this Zafarnamah http://www.zafarnama.com/Download/zafarnama.pdf please read this and edit the result of the battle of chamkaur	0	0	0	0
70bc87f7402b320f	Section break I have split off the controversial item about prior Palestinian use and Israeli capture of the land into its own section. In my opinion, this material belongs in a separate section and not in the lead. It may appear that I'm trying to introduce a pro-Israel bias, but really I'm just trying to put the material in its proper place, not to remove any of it from view. I hope that's okay. (Shalom)	0	0	0	0
70bcdaa49c0ce2d3	Hmmm... So you decide not to answer my question huh? Is it because I am Japanese? I knew it! This site is fucking racist. You are a god dam motherfucking racist piece of shit! All you Japanese hating motherfuckers should go to hell. Especially the Americans!. They should go to hell for killing all my people in WW2. Tell me why you are a racist you son of a bitch? I am going to report this to the administrators to get you ass blocked!	1	1	1	1
70c29ca438d6d515	":::I don't get particularly upset about AD/CE, and as far as I know, you don't either. Poor Chooserr does, on the other hand, and has been blocked for edit warring a few times. But the battle as to when the Gospels were written and as to whether Jesus really existed is being fought at Jesus as well as at Historicity of Jesus, with one of the same editors leading the battle. I only came across the dispute quite recently, although the article was on my watchlist as a vandalism target. This editor insists on writing ""jesus"" (quotation marks, and lower case) all over the talk page, to make the point that Jesus wasn't a real person, and for a while he was adding a paragraph saying that there was no evidence that he had ever existed. I do recall reading that the agreement was that if articles already had CE, they shouldn't be changed to AD, and if they had AD, they shouldn't be changed to CE. I haven't found the relevant page. I think the dating of the Gospels is more important. I have Robinson, Tresmontant, and Carmignac in the house, but have only skimmed through them. They, as you know, argue for an early date. I can never work out how reliable Brown is supposed to be. Father Peter Straviskas, whom I trust, seems to think highly of him; Father William Most, whom I also trusted (he's dead now) considered him very unreliable. Going down to dinner now. Aurelie! (talk) "	0	0	0	0
70c4c54351f780d3	" I haven't said anywhere that baku was founded by seljuqs and Baku was founded by turkic tribes, I just were answering your untrue claim that Baku was founded before turkic tribes came to Azerbaijan, and brought three sources that indicate that turkic tribes were in caucasus during the foundation of baku. so those alternative hypothesis have the right to be listed here. by the way why you were also removing hypothesis regarding lak origin of baku word? or laks were also somewhere far away when baku was founded? they are one of the oldest indigeneous people in the caucasus. you do not remove sources because of their ""unacademicism"" but because they contradict your worldview. Coming to your second claim, that turkic tribes never settled in the region, just look at three russian quotes i gave above. you are just pushing your pov by interpreting sources as you like. "	0	0	0	0
70cb17093f1744fd	Pakoda Please do not remove bread as a type of Pakoda. My wife is from India, and yes, they do occasionally deep-fry bread pieces with Basan flour. Ask ANYBODY from India. They are not as common as say, spinach or onion, but yes, I have had them many times. I cannot understand what would motivate you to remove my post anyway? Thank you.	0	0	0	0
70cb3a63f64f7abb	Thank You Haikupoet, You Are A Legend. I Will Find Out In The Near Future, If You Help Us, Thanks Ever So Much	0	0	0	0
70d090216d21b322	help Hey beautiful, can you plz tell me how 2 insert a picture into a wikipedia page thnx	0	0	0	0
70d096ddb512f3e4	I agree with Davidnortman's remarks above.	0	0	0	0
70ebeaf171aa18e4	" Do your own homework, rather than blocking someone and then tuning around and asking for their help. My god, do you know shit about real life ? ☏ 00:15, 22 Jun 2012 (UTC)"	1	0	0	0
70f06d3ee20837b4	It is clear to me that Wikipedia is not a reliable source of info, a lot of reviews, media, people in the know give the warning that Wikipedia can not be trusted. I see that with my own eyes now, and before I get out (and never visit this website) I want to make a suggestion regarding your “strict” policy regarding verifiable source of info. I understand that policy to be applied for well-known topics that have been written about in many media sources. I think is a non-sense, a disservice to users asking that policy to be applied to a trivial, un-known, insignificant topic like www.softpedia.com. Where somebody can find such “verifiable” sources? Should we go and ask media, Web-security companies, PC magazine to rate web-sites like this every year or so? Allowing only one point of view (theirs), given them the liberty to publicize what and how they are doing their thing and not allowing another point of view, a “check” to agree/disagree to their saying, I don’t think that is correct and conform to what big Jimbo thinks that Wikipedia should stand for.	0	0	0	0
7105103dd3846ac3	For the record: barricade is in the third movie. so he survived. you might want to check your resources before posting information.	0	0	0	0
7105a59243267ab1	Assessment I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers,	0	0	0	0
7107c858933286c9	Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (vandalism and selfishness with users)	0	0	0	0
71094085f5ef64b3	Listed buildings in Liverpool Hi, I'd like to try and get some discussion started over at WP:MERSEY on the listed buildings articles, about how they should be organised and what information should be included. Anyway I'd be grateful for your input	0	0	0	0
710f6825cd69d33a	"> Any sections of this talk page older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:King Toadsworth/Archive by .	0	0	0	0
711194695dfc8a00	":: The bias is this: ""Jew Watch is an antisemitic website."" and many other statements in the article. These statements gives a false impression about the web site jew watch, because the canard anti-semitism implies that there is intentionally malicious, false and misrepresented material regarding jews, this premise is false because the goal of the site is to be scholarly and honest about jews, not make up facts and falsehoods about them. Frank Weltner is a librarian and scholar who has tirelessly researched, documented and put together one of the worlds largest libraries in the world on Jews in our world today. Lokison "	0	0	0	0
711532f084c36288	My Apologies I apologize for the vandilizim of the above Wikipedias. However, this computer is a school computer, so the chance of tracking the vandil down is useless. At least 500 people a day have access to this computer. At lest 4 people a day use it regularily. If it is possible to make it so that the school connection can veiw but not edit Wikipedia entries, that would be best.	0	0	0	0
7115a3946cfbc89f	RfC This article was listed on on wp:rfc five days ago - is one still wanted, or can I de-list it? (Talk) 20:30, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
711913e91fc8a01e	" seeming contradiction ""while more latitudinarian Protestants and atheists were pillarless"" vs. ""People who were not associated with one of these pillars, mainly middle and upper class latitudinarian Protestants and atheists set up their own pillar: the general pillar."" Now I am confused... Anybody can help us out here?"	0	0	0	0
71197a9614df846c	Why won't the edit feature work.	0	0	0	0
711ac70a7d294932	" Indeed, I admit I was a bit too edit-warry there and I shouldn't have. / I guess when certain editors are determined to make this project into a warzone, it's just too tempting to give in and war against them. ✽ "	0	0	0	0
7122fcaf5d4e7db3	These edits are confirmed as vandalism.	0	0	0	0
7123e5de7f38f1da	well well THOTH, showing our true colors are we? Seems to me from your remark that you approve of what they said!	0	0	0	0
71243c2273d33f3e	I am friends with bote editors and I agree to stop.	0	0	0	0
7124b5e20d8436ed	The threat is often worse than reality. As Trade Union negotiator, I raised the wages of section I represented to the highest within the company for that particular type of work, across all the UK sites. I never had more than 25% of the section members that I could rely on to take action, but those 25% were vocal, and the other 75% had the good sense to keep quiet.	0	0	0	0
712fdcf3a3639339	Reliability I had a Jaz drive, and experienced a lot of reliability problems. I'll try to do some research and expand this article. Symantecs	0	0	0	0
713bbf7b5c519bfb	" You know, I'm leaning more and more towards Roger's opinion here: knowing what we know about the sources, I think it's implied that IBM re-invented DC, but it's not unambiguous, and it's really not such a critical point to this article. I think we should just say that IBM was aware of differential cryptanalysis but didn't publish it, at least in this article: the proper place to get into this in detail would be in the Data Encryption Standard article or the differential cryptanalysis article. juicetalk "	0	0	0	0
7140b6717f5abc82	July 2009 Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you.	0	0	0	0
714f397963adbd1a	My edits are personal opinion? What does that even mean? I was making my edits based on what I believe the guidelines currently say is correct. If I was wrong, I'd happily revert myself. I'm not sure what about my edits you don't feel is respectful, but you seriously need to look more closely into this guideline. ♠Dil	0	0	0	0
7156a282d8eabab3	" Change from dormant to failed I'm a bit concerned about this edit; is it really accurate to describe PWD as ""failed?"" I thought that its proponents just never got around to pushing this proposal with enough alacrity for a true consensus to emerge one way or the other. "	0	0	0	0
715e98258ab039e6	Do not use: I agree this template should not be used, because it will eventually break due to MediaWiki limitations. I tried adding more episodes to it, and it broke all the pages that used it.	0	0	0	0
715ea88ef650a6aa	Reply. Check the dates, I was blocked for that incident for a week. -	0	0	0	0
71679d748f2818a9	indeed, he is not surprised that that your fascist state was repeatedly elected několirktá as the biggest problem in the path to world peace actually, you stupid, patriotic, manipulative bastards should kill, burn, your entire floor level to the ground and even sprinkle with salt ... or one day destroy the entire world ...	0	0	0	0
716e6ba37fba42d2	":::# You're an idiot. Throwing a punch is a causal act. The causal actor in the case of words is the recipient, not the speaker, and certainly not the words. Again, you're an idiot. The purpose is clear: to not have the noticeboard connected with her/his account. I'm under no obligation to kiss the asses of market fundamentalists and beg them if I can edit ""their"" articles to replace fantasy with reality. The fact that I'm the one being pigpiled here, instead of them, is quite telling. Telling bullies who visit my talk page to fuck off is not disruptive to the project. "	1	1	1	0
71701fa7f7c661ca	I've had a quick look, it's certainly a major improvement. Although 10 years old I think it would be better to use the 2001 census figures for population with an explanation that this is likely to have risen to the 2009 mid year estimates. The stats in the table seem to be a mixture of the 2001 census and more recent estimates, and a source next the every figure in the table seems a bit overkill and a little distracting - would it be better to just use the 2001 census and have one reference at the top of each column (similar to the Somerset table)? I also think it would be useful to have an additional column in the table for England or Great Britain so the figures can be compared to the national averages. These aren't major issues - let me know what you think.	0	0	0	0
71715ceb827eb079	Protection Request Just a heads up. Feel free to put in your .02 cents Endless Dan	0	0	0	0
71781e06eeae6369	Happy for you to go ahead. Would we need to keep textual description for read aloud software?	0	0	0	0
717e0373043b6514	Then Assert Your Case; Please Do... You write: But that aside, in reading the section above this one, you almost sound as if you wish to be blocked. I am not afraid, as you administrators appear to want us to be, in FEAR. I have found you to be, and I'm not suprized, to be in Chomskyen, 'NAKED.' You are without clothes and, truth is, YOU, are afraid. See, Truth ... terror ...	0	0	0	0
717f486fb4dbd164	" Hello Snowcat.ntas, and thank you for your contribution to the article. First, please note that I have re-inserted information that I assume you do not have a problem with. Second, rather than getting into an edit war with you, I would like to propose that we come to consensus about what we're each talking about in reference to this dispute. The article content I believe you are disputing is the information about the wolf siting. Is that correct? Can we agree on that? I would suggest that since the information you have repeatedly deleted is verifiable by reliable sources, it is legitimate for inclusion. The fact that it is testimony from the US Senate makes it notable to the article's topic, no matter what the topic is. You are correct that it should be included in the other article; however, it is notable to this one as well. A way to resolve what you state is ""clearly biased and politically motivated to reflect an anti-environmental view"" is to provide a reliably sourced counter-perspective. I look forward to your response, and to working out a solution to this dispute. Thanks! • Freechild'''sup?'' "	0	0	0	0
717f6930af943c80	" Invitation I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B; and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards "	0	0	0	0
7182e88245e73fe7	You twats know fuck all about anything.	1	1	1	0
71839a274c506959	, one which concerned	0	0	0	0
7183dc5423a6c751	fuck you Hey fuck you! Uncle Grandpa is actually Kurt Cobain! Pizza Steve, Mr. Gus, Belly Bag and Giant Flying Realistic Tiger are all the other band members so I will ask politely may you please fuck off. 118.93.190.23	1	1	1	0
718629963d505de1	Maybe you should be civil towards other people and you'll get the same back. Acting like an admin doesn't get across to people very well.	0	0	0	0
71866f0fb21d4cd4	" The VERY Naive Perspective This was stated: 'There was no implication that ALL VNR's are propaganda. If SOME VNRs are demonstrably propaganda, which I infer is undisputed, then the statement is factually correct and ideologically neutral.' Separated into two concepts: a) that ""There was no implication that ALL VNRs are propaganda."" -and- b) ""If SOME VNRs are demonstrably propaganda ... then the statement is factually correct and ideologically neutral."" In regards to the first:- A Video ""News"" Release by the government, which is ( as they, a priori, are ) intended to create the appearance of congruity for an idea which aids the government through causing an apparent or actual concordance between the beliefs of those in control and those being controlled is, by definition, propaganda. In regards to the second:- Is the statement that the labeling of VNR's is an ideologically neutral act? It would not be, as, through labeling it, one is categorizing it ideologically. Please do not misunderstand, IMHO VNR's are an advanced form of embedded propaganda which elegantly use the psycholinguistic concept contained in the idea ""The Fish do not see the Water"". In Communication Studies, Propaganda Studies, even Neuro-Linguistic Programming NLP( which, while it is a controversial system, is based on common-sense ""slight of mind"" techniques.) the Sandwich Formula of: /true statement -> statement intended to be perceived as true -> true statement/ is being used here. Example: 6 o'clock news, tired Americans sit down to eat and watch the news. In the middle of verifiable and true information segments a VNR is placed, so the end effect of 'Rain tomorrow //-> VNR Information //-> Gas is up by 1 cent' is to believe 3 new facts, not 2 and one to question. My 2 cents, "	0	0	0	0
71869001fc63e43c	" Bad LOGIC =Progressivism On the progressivism and economic progressivism pages some editors have deleted criticism on the following grounds. 1. The article needs to be expanded first. 2. The article needs to be improved first. 3. Criticsm section puts undo weight on negatives. Well I say this logic leads to only one outcome, the articles purpose is to argue the point which is a violation of NPOV. 1. If the article needs expanding, expand it...criticism also helps expand. THe purpose of the article is to report all the facts not just the facts in favor of the article title. 2. The article is improved just by including a criticism section. Again, THe purpose of the article is to report all the facts not just the facts in favor of the article title. Deleting the criticism on the grounds that the article needs to be improved suggests the only way to improve the article is by aruging the point. Again, violation of NPOV. 3. Criticism does not put undo weight on negatives. Again the purpose of the article is not to argue the point of progressivism but to report the facts. 4. The fact is criticism exists and it should be reported. The criticism section included an AUthor and his book. 5. The addition of a pov original research counter arguement to the criticism further proves my point (And you can look on the history page) that they believe the purpose of the article is to argue the point rather than report the facts. All were poorly reasoned excuses to delete material they objected to. These editors are not trying to preserve the integrity of wikipedia or be ""Fair and balanced"" they are simply trying to push a leftist political objective by censoring any alternative regardless of the source. Classical Liberalism Editor Slizor has deleted several sections and paragraphs which were cited and refrenced, including quotes from economists and think tanks on various things which Slizor has expressed disagreement with. Dispite these citations, he deleted the material on the grounds that what he believes is the truth does not fit the facts provided. He claims, dispite contradictory evidence and no evidence of his own that classical liberals have nothing in common with libertarians. That classical liberals are not inheritors of liberalism. and that modern liberals do not have a different understanding of liberalism than 200 years ago. Furthermore, he makes the original research pov claim that classical liberals are more like elitist Republicans than libertarians (for which he has NO CITATION, and this is one of the grounds for the deletions). This is just another example of the abuse some wiki editors will make up in order to push their own agenda. The logic is poor. The citation is non existant. The pov is massive. Slizor's edit needs a massive revert...and he needs to be drawn away from his computer and beaten with Milton Friedman and FA Hayek books until he understands the quotes from their books that he deleted. ( )"	0	0	0	0
718cecd95c96f5d1	"Trolling is not a harassment, its a definition of a person who keeps posting non-sense on websites and that's what you are doing with ""citation needed"". FYI: I will continue to keep on ""harassing"" you until you leave Rap artist articles. "	0	0	0	0
719301b706e060a7	I'd need to put a bit of thought, and get some consensus, as to how best to start working on the article again. I'd be very tempted to revert to the last version I edited, in 2008. Since then User:Amideg (Ami = Anne Marie de Grazia) has taken out a lot of the stuff that attests to notability and put in a lot of useless fancruft. But there might have also been some useful edits in the meantime, so it all needs unpacking. If I'm not simply adding to the article right now, that's why, plus I don't want to spend time on it again if it's for the chop.	0	0	0	0
7195ff8c4bdb2c1b	" السلام عليكم. First, thank you for your good faith and contribution, but unfortunately your are making a huge mistake. ""...or who recents ancestors lived in Morocco.."", that's not the correct definition, that's YOUR definition. You lack an understanding of basic terms. Please read the following articles: Jews, ethnic group and ethnoreligious group. Moroccan Jews is not an ethnic group, Jews ARE the ethnic group. Moreover, Israelis ""of Moroccan origin"" don't fit the definition of ""Moroccans"". I have noticed you have already encountered objections from other users, and yet you proceed with this mistake instead of discussing it. Please do not continue with this, or i'll have to report you. Thank you and best regards."	0	0	0	0
7197a9b15b3d0662	Happy Diwali!! Happy Diwali to you!!May the Force be with you! ($ \|-\| r 3 $ \|-\| t \|-\|)	0	0	0	0
71992692d42b5869	"== Some baklava for you! == Hi "	0	0	0	0
719934ffcd9fbbd7	And using Valentino to argue that there is no connection between communism and mass killings is pretty creative in itself, as he repeatedly argues for the connection.	0	0	0	0
71accb8658c6d3b0	Oppose per WP:PROT and WP:OWN. Both of these trump a proposal that hasn't even achieved consensus support yet.	0	0	0	0
71addfded891a4d9	I'd like to see some pics of the new Gunningsville Brige	0	0	0	0
71af2dc3aa135b02	" To Sandstein, No you are absolutely wrong talk pages are deleted here is Wikimedia's stance on the matter User and talk pages, and their subpages, and other non-article pages that no others have substantively contributed to and whose existence does not impact the project, may be courtesy blanked or deleted.. When you are an administrator you have responsibilities that includes upholding Wikimedia's legal policy's. I have asked for 'ALL' of my user space to be deleted and that includes my talk page. I WILL be taking legal action personally against you if not fulfilled and believe me this is not a threat it is an absolute promise, look you don't know me one bit my Dad bought me a house when I was 21 I now have three cars and a boat and an interstate apartment and enough money and time on my hands to defend my privacy which I will. Ecoleetage's page was deleted, and I have seen it done many times before. Don't try and be the tough guy here you will NOT succeed outside Wikipedia.org. So I leave it up to you. I advise you not to be stupid here. Believe me I am more than happy to go ahead with my threats just fucking try me you piece of shit. I have already started the ball rolling by contacting and paying for lawyers before writing this. Now you may be thinking ""oh it's a courtesy thing we don't have to do it"" now that wording does not stand up in court the fact is Wikimedia offer this courtesy and I am asking for it you are nobody to go against Wikimedia's legal policys. Now I've reached my level of dealing with Wikimedia. I warn you one last time do it or your fucked. Jack In122.49.151.145 "	0	0	0	0
71afdcdf01608672	She continues to serve on the Commission while awaiting Senate confirmation.	0	0	0	0
71be3c945c8016bb	Why don't you tell that to thejadefalcon! He doesn't seem to be aware of that rule, or are wiki editors excluded from it?71.174.142.108	0	0	0	0
71bf6ff9f896b2c5	I disagree with you. In terms of Glass-Steagal there are only investment banks or savings banks. Savings banks include 'savings and loan' banks. The difference is who backs the money (FDIC vs. FSLIC). Glass-Steagal removed the barrier between investment banks and savings banks (including savings and loans). THC Loadee	0	0	0	0
71c50a033c67ecac	You appear to have an eye, for quality Art Work. (Richard) Keep the faith	0	0	0	0
71c548987d11cdfc	" angelous there should be a mention of angelous, the dude who could impersonate jay-z and made all those mixtape songs over jay-z beats. 'Lost Ones' And Jay's relationship with Beyonce The article says that ""Many fans disputed this analysis, claiming that the song references a previous relationship with actress Rosario Dawson and that her burgeoning career ended the romance."" That's not what I heard. I read somewhere that the verses were about Beyonce but from years earlier. at the time of Kingdom Come, Beyonce was 25, but the verses refer to the girl being 23. This shows that the verse was written after the black album, and could have been used for Kingdom come. They are clearly back together in Kindom Come, and the song could have been from a rough patch in '04-'05. Both theories are possible and should be included in the article Also known as His only other names are Jigga, Jiggaman, Hov, Hova, and JayHova thats about it i'm taking the rest off —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "	0	0	0	0
71c9c030053af3fa	Why this article is locked out?	0	0	0	0
71cca74d5b296c7c	It's obviously not a personal attack. By posting this you admit you didn't read my entire message and i indicated that I have nothing against him as a person, but I have very strong and reasonable doubts about the truthfullness of the things he is editing. By accusing me of personal attacks you prove that you are very obstinate against me. Why are you doing this? I feel i'm oppressed by you. The one who is attacking is you. I don't want to hurt nobody, this is obviously not the point. I am a peaceful man. I just want to discuss. Are you able to defferenciate between derogatory statements and discussion?	0	0	0	0
71d2d1bd509429f0	Did he ever publicly declare his religion ? Then it should be referenced. He comes from a culture that clearly separated Jews as a blood line and Judaists as a religion. The fact that he chairs Jewish social organizations is as relevant as his business partnership with Reverend Moon. If the statement on religion is unsourced, it should be removed.	0	0	0	0
71d3aa21eb0916ee	":: Still stuck at work for an hour or so. On the plus side, there has been a betting pool at work to see how long before I got in trouble for some of my own stupidities. I'm out $5. exhales I'll be the first to admit I crossed the line. Firsfron is an admin I can solidly respect for never being full of shit. I feel like blocks are an affair of honor if you fuck up, and you know you did, and you did it anyway, you have to do the time. The statements I made were personal attacks sadly, depressingly, they were also right and there are probably lots of people who feel the same way but who have enough sense not to say so on-wiki. I should apologize to some admins for not sticking them on the excellent and good list. I aught to apologize to some of the admins on the bad list for posting my opinion. I'm bad at apologies. I apologized to Kelly Martin (and damn me, that was hard for me to swallow) because , no matter how I hated what she said, she was right. brightens Still, you're my friend, and I do appreciate what everyone has said here and on that RfC by CoolCat and on ANI. This , however, remains an excellent example of why I don't wanna be an admin. Talk\| "	0	0	0	0
71d67f873a07d99d	The Alaska Wild have a logo on their arenafan site (see external links Could you please put it in? Thanks! M. Burmy 13:45 CDT 1 July 2006 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
71d6ab5e66e9b5d7	Governor of the Bank of Jamaica.Im jamaican and i know for a fact that Mr.latibeaudiere resigned on october 30 2009 please look it up yes yes it does i want all info on my county to be factual,NO foreign can lie to me about a place i have lived all my GD life!	0	0	0	0
71d88f0f6ff253c9	Geography Category Thank you for informing me of that miscategorization. It has been corrected. mappychris	0	0	0	0
71defe0f1f13a2bc	MBizanz likes to PNP...BB only	0	0	0	0
71e116bfa31429d8	Theres no such thing as nuetral, people cannot be divided straight down the middle, so I will present my beliefs as such... I am a holocaust REVISIONIST (not a holocaust denier). I am a nationialist (Australia) I dislike globalisation and companies in general I dislike christianity and all forms of mass religion I believe men act like woman nowadays and it sickens me Racism is healthy and human Our Id (frued terminology) is more important than our superego I am more elite than any nerd on the net	0	0	0	0
71e9501a09c02adb	Your image on the Windows Vista page Since I saw your image on the Windows Vista page, I have been looking everywhere for the desktop background you were using in that screencap, but I can't find it! Is it available for download online? Please let me know! Thanks	0	0	0	0
71ebb9ba83165f2a	i think dapi misquoted glantz so i want to read the sources. i this false? and fact is that german units were back soon an started pounding russian units so i think dapi highlighted something which is not as cool as he thinks. value for the reader....	0	0	0	0
71f0615f6dffb2fb	T-90 armor Please discuss. There are contradictions from the available sources. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t-90.htm This website claims T-90A protection as follow; vs APFSDS: 550 mm + 250-280mm with Kontakt-5 = 800-830mm vs HEAT: 650 mm + 500-700mm with Kontakt-5 = 1,150-1,350mm. This means that against APFSDS, 550mm is for T-90A Basic Armor, without Kontakt-5, and 250~280mm is for Kontakt-5. If you add this up, the sum is 800~830mm for the whole T-90A Armor. doesn't know anything about what ERA is and how it works. And now he is the one who vandaling the article.	0	0	0	0
71f4c9a07e5e4e3a	This is your last warning. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen	0	0	0	0
71f5afd82dcd5c0a	I am sorry, but I cannot find any differences of me wikihounding or personally attacking somebody or anybody. Could you please be so kind and provide the exact differences of me wikihounding and personal attacking somebody. Please just take them from that very AN/I report and post them here.	0	0	0	0
71f85b7a3aa6ce0f	" Looks a bit spammy, indeed. I have inserted them into COIBot, lets monitor. It looks like a real journal, but seems to be quite COI. T C "	0	0	0	0
71fada8aa8f7e0e9	" Barnstar! The Special Barnstar Thank you for commenting on the punitive nature of my block extention. The original block was probably useful in reminding me to guard my tongue. Although disagreeing with my record or methods is irksome personally (for you too probably), you still stood up for what was appropriate in this scenario. Thank you "	0	0	0	0
72012c1633282a1f	FFS What am I doing wrong? I'm trying to help sort better information here and it seems as if you hate and dissagree with me here. What is wrong with it? Can you please explain. I'm not vandalizing or ruining pages.	0	0	0	0
720613cddf648bed	" I have found the holy grail Browsing around on the Louisiana state library, and I've come across the holy grail of signs. It's got cutout US routes, cutout diamond Louisiana routes (with a black top, ironically enough), curves and detours, and old fashioned stop signs. Makes me want to jump back in time for a week, steal some, then bring em back. [{File:LA_signs.svg]] "	0	0	0	0
7206c06bcd00f63a	Its too messy for them to touch. They were going to (touch it) in 1850, but backed off. The NSW and Victorian Governors finally gazetted/fixed the curly bit of the boundary in March or so this year, but no one will go near the other. Its all fully documented in various places. Alas, I am blocked from contributing by that totally psycho playschooler, Artkos, so had better start taking notice so he gets his jollies today ... eh?	0	0	0	0
7213c3afe948d001	2010's Arthur Rubin i want to thank but i like to fuck you if want to erase my edits on 2010's go and i say you is fuck you you are fucking shit and idiot.	1	1	1	0
721546c57a477087	(Although in fairness I did not start that page as it existed before as a redirect to Oskar Klein)	0	0	0	0
721adadc6a698db7	Thank you for experimenting with the page Evan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. + R/W	0	0	0	0
722786f971abeef9	" Notability of Aislin Band A tag has been placed on Aislin Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
722b7119ffca1c31	Thanks dude! As soon as I'm unblocked, I'll imitate your signature. ;-) 74.58.27.35	0	0	0	0
723342857bd3e73a	" If you're going to toss around numbers of ""real"" scientists, I will point out that there has been some question as to how many of the ""thousands of scientists"" involved in the IPCC consensus process are actually scientists working in the area of climate change. If you're going to make ad hominem attacks on the opponents of global warming, it might be interesting to analyze the credentials of the scientists on both sides of the issue. I wonder if anyone has actually done this analysis for both sides of the debate. I think it's unlikely, given the partisan nature of the debate. It's far more likely that each side of the debate assumes their ""experts"" are all wonderful and importantant scientists, while the other side's experts are obviously incompetent and bought off. Global Warming Non-Believers I have no idea how the article should be updated for the following information. Any suggestions would be appreciated. However, 100 scientists are on record as strongly opposing the conclusions of the IPCC. I wouldn't consider this to be ""only a few."" They published an open letter to Ban Ki-Moon, available at http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164002. Interestingly, there are also scientific claims made within this letter (such as the claim that there has been no global warming since 1998) that probably also need to be addressed in the article. I don't have the time or expertise to amend the article to include this information in a fair and balance manner, but if it's not included I'd argue that the article is misleading at best. "	0	0	0	0
724021b721f3296b	No, I meant: for this year, how many 1 year terms versus 2 year terms would there be if I appoint to 9/9 tranches versus automatic 2 year terms for everyone in the top-up to 18?	0	0	0	0
7241902573618097	Can't believe you locked that guy's talk page. Surely a woman of your interlect, who studied at the same institution as ghandi, realises the importance of dialogue.	0	0	0	0
7246d7a7de008235	GOOD RIDDANCE. GET LOST. PUNK.	1	0	0	0

706d665c3d692613

\fuck you, who the shit is ari?

1

0

1

0

1

0

707b5510dfa06188

":::We'll have to agree to disagree (BTW AE's instructor's name is Neta Snook, not ""Anita""). This article is about Snook, part of which is Snook's frustrations with trying to create safe pilots where there are none. Some editors are leaning in the direction of whitewashing some of the training issues, and doing just that is contrary to traditional aviation training practices. The fact that some editors beat an argument to death doesn't mean that the issue has gone away. As long as there's aviation instructors reading this material, the issue still has legs, regardless of whether you think you've heard enough about it. I know it's a delicate subject, but the successful pilots are those who have never crashed a plane, and never become lost. Snook's job was to train such pilots. This article is still a delicate whitewash of one flight instructor's important mission and is totally unsatisfactory for just that reason. "

0

70863a9538d1660d

" Move? InterAcademy Panel on International Issues → InterAcademy Panel (IAP) – The original title is misleading because the organizations real name is simply InterAcademy Panel. International Issues is part of what the organization does but not the only thing. It is a ""Global Network of Science Academies"" and focuses more on scientific international issues, bringing world science academies together and helping them grow and contribute to global discussions. See www.interacademies.net/About.aspx The acronym should not be appended. The page title should be if this is the name of the organisation. Looking at their statutes, the name is indeed InterAcademy Panel, supporting the statement of MegaSloth. But I suggest to follow the ""Requesting a single page move"" procedure as explained underneath, so other people can be involved in the discussion. (messages) "

0

7086850396c149be

ZBD was the The Saviour in AC technology, because it had great 97-99% efficiency and shunt connection. And it was patented with a revolutionary new power distribution system. Before ZBD the AC had no real chance to rival with Edison's DC system.

0

7087a06c74ef0ca6

Please see WP:NOTFORUM. This talk page is intended solely for discussions directly related to article content, and is not a forum for general discussions relating to pornography.

0

70890cf26c2dd3ff

" Okay, I can go with the combined form of ""mudflow"". Gorthian, I presume you approve of the rename, as do I and Vsmith, and as urged by two other editors previously. There being no dissents, I will proceed with this tomorrow. I also have a new lead paragraph (sourced!) which I think will be a distinct improvement. ~ (talk) "

0

708e5857da1aa53d

In alternate or future history / fiction What movies have had Mount Rushmore altered with one or more future presidents? I seem to remember a black woman was added in some movie set in the year 2050 or something. 68.0.119.139

0

7091f7e667317836

" Etymology In regards to the South Slavic etymology, ""Koza"" means goat, and ""Koža"" means skin. It is called ""Kožani"" in Slavic so I don't believe the reference to goat is correct, although goatskin or just ""skin"" (as in leather) makes sense. Correct me if I'm wrong. Alex "

0

70990e503f69b2bc

I made those hiphop edits; my brother was on this computer earlier so he is probably the culprit; I will tell him to stop the vandalism. -

0

709a40d705e83ccd

" That is good idea - ""begets"" is Present Perfect and the inflected form ""begotten"" covers Past Participle. Please note that I did keep saying Past Present - its Present Perfect for something that happened in the past and is (or may be) still be going on. So ""neither begets nor was begotten"" is the one. "

0

709f7ec70db28206

Hi, found you ;') Where's this page? Ben

0

70aaa8d4b1300927

Mam i found this Zafarnamah http://www.zafarnama.com/Download/zafarnama.pdf please read this and edit the result of the battle of chamkaur

0

70bc87f7402b320f

Section break I have split off the controversial item about prior Palestinian use and Israeli capture of the land into its own section. In my opinion, this material belongs in a separate section and not in the lead. It may appear that I'm trying to introduce a pro-Israel bias, but really I'm just trying to put the material in its proper place, not to remove any of it from view. I hope that's okay. (Shalom)

0

70bcdaa49c0ce2d3

Hmmm... So you decide not to answer my question huh? Is it because I am Japanese? I knew it! This site is fucking racist. You are a god dam motherfucking racist piece of shit! All you Japanese hating motherfuckers should go to hell. Especially the Americans!. They should go to hell for killing all my people in WW2. Tell me why you are a racist you son of a bitch? I am going to report this to the administrators to get you ass blocked!

1

0

1

0

1

70c29ca438d6d515

":::I don't get particularly upset about AD/CE, and as far as I know, you don't either. Poor Chooserr does, on the other hand, and has been blocked for edit warring a few times. But the battle as to when the Gospels were written and as to whether Jesus really existed is being fought at Jesus as well as at Historicity of Jesus, with one of the same editors leading the battle. I only came across the dispute quite recently, although the article was on my watchlist as a vandalism target. This editor insists on writing ""jesus"" (quotation marks, and lower case) all over the talk page, to make the point that Jesus wasn't a real person, and for a while he was adding a paragraph saying that there was no evidence that he had ever existed. I do recall reading that the agreement was that if articles already had CE, they shouldn't be changed to AD, and if they had AD, they shouldn't be changed to CE. I haven't found the relevant page. I think the dating of the Gospels is more important. I have Robinson, Tresmontant, and Carmignac in the house, but have only skimmed through them. They, as you know, argue for an early date. I can never work out how reliable Brown is supposed to be. Father Peter Straviskas, whom I trust, seems to think highly of him; Father William Most, whom I also trusted (he's dead now) considered him very unreliable. Going down to dinner now. Aurelie! (talk) "

0

70c4c54351f780d3

" I haven't said anywhere that baku was founded by seljuqs and Baku was founded by turkic tribes, I just were answering your untrue claim that Baku was founded before turkic tribes came to Azerbaijan, and brought three sources that indicate that turkic tribes were in caucasus during the foundation of baku. so those alternative hypothesis have the right to be listed here. by the way why you were also removing hypothesis regarding lak origin of baku word? or laks were also somewhere far away when baku was founded? they are one of the oldest indigeneous people in the caucasus. you do not remove sources because of their ""unacademicism"" but because they contradict your worldview. Coming to your second claim, that turkic tribes never settled in the region, just look at three russian quotes i gave above. you are just pushing your pov by interpreting sources as you like. "

0

70cb17093f1744fd

Pakoda Please do not remove bread as a type of Pakoda. My wife is from India, and yes, they do occasionally deep-fry bread pieces with Basan flour. Ask ANYBODY from India. They are not as common as say, spinach or onion, but yes, I have had them many times. I cannot understand what would motivate you to remove my post anyway? Thank you.

0

70cb3a63f64f7abb

Thank You Haikupoet, You Are A Legend. I Will Find Out In The Near Future, If You Help Us, Thanks Ever So Much

0

70d090216d21b322

help Hey beautiful, can you plz tell me how 2 insert a picture into a wikipedia page thnx

0

70d096ddb512f3e4

I agree with Davidnortman's remarks above.

0

70ebeaf171aa18e4

" Do your own homework, rather than blocking someone and then tuning around and asking for their help. My god, do you know shit about real life ? ☏ 00:15, 22 Jun 2012 (UTC)"

1

0

70f06d3ee20837b4

It is clear to me that Wikipedia is not a reliable source of info, a lot of reviews, media, people in the know give the warning that Wikipedia can not be trusted. I see that with my own eyes now, and before I get out (and never visit this website) I want to make a suggestion regarding your “strict” policy regarding verifiable source of info. I understand that policy to be applied for well-known topics that have been written about in many media sources. I think is a non-sense, a disservice to users asking that policy to be applied to a trivial, un-known, insignificant topic like www.softpedia.com. Where somebody can find such “verifiable” sources? Should we go and ask media, Web-security companies, PC magazine to rate web-sites like this every year or so? Allowing only one point of view (theirs), given them the liberty to publicize what and how they are doing their thing and not allowing another point of view, a “check” to agree/disagree to their saying, I don’t think that is correct and conform to what big Jimbo thinks that Wikipedia should stand for.

0

7105103dd3846ac3

For the record: barricade is in the third movie. so he survived. you might want to check your resources before posting information.

0

7105a59243267ab1

Assessment I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers,

0

7107c858933286c9

Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (vandalism and selfishness with users)

0

71094085f5ef64b3

Listed buildings in Liverpool Hi, I'd like to try and get some discussion started over at WP:MERSEY on the listed buildings articles, about how they should be organised and what information should be included. Anyway I'd be grateful for your input

0

710f6825cd69d33a

"> Any sections of this talk page older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:King Toadsworth/Archive by .

0

711194695dfc8a00

":: The bias is this: ""Jew Watch is an antisemitic website."" and many other statements in the article. These statements gives a false impression about the web site jew watch, because the canard anti-semitism implies that there is intentionally malicious, false and misrepresented material regarding jews, this premise is false because the goal of the site is to be scholarly and honest about jews, not make up facts and falsehoods about them. Frank Weltner is a librarian and scholar who has tirelessly researched, documented and put together one of the worlds largest libraries in the world on Jews in our world today. Lokison "

0

711532f084c36288

My Apologies I apologize for the vandilizim of the above Wikipedias. However, this computer is a school computer, so the chance of tracking the vandil down is useless. At least 500 people a day have access to this computer. At lest 4 people a day use it regularily. If it is possible to make it so that the school connection can veiw but not edit Wikipedia entries, that would be best.

0

7115a3946cfbc89f

RfC This article was listed on on wp:rfc five days ago - is one still wanted, or can I de-list it? (Talk) 20:30, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

0

711913e91fc8a01e

" seeming contradiction ""while more latitudinarian Protestants and atheists were pillarless"" vs. ""People who were not associated with one of these pillars, mainly middle and upper class latitudinarian Protestants and atheists set up their own pillar: the general pillar."" Now I am confused... Anybody can help us out here?"

0

71197a9614df846c

Why won't the edit feature work.

0

711ac70a7d294932

" Indeed, I admit I was a bit too edit-warry there and I shouldn't have. / I guess when certain editors are determined to make this project into a warzone, it's just too tempting to give in and war against them. ✽ "

0

7122fcaf5d4e7db3

These edits are confirmed as vandalism.

0

7123e5de7f38f1da

well well THOTH, showing our true colors are we? Seems to me from your remark that you approve of what they said!

0

71243c2273d33f3e

I am friends with bote editors and I agree to stop.

0

7124b5e20d8436ed

The threat is often worse than reality. As Trade Union negotiator, I raised the wages of section I represented to the highest within the company for that particular type of work, across all the UK sites. I never had more than 25% of the section members that I could rely on to take action, but those 25% were vocal, and the other 75% had the good sense to keep quiet.

0

712fdcf3a3639339

Reliability I had a Jaz drive, and experienced a lot of reliability problems. I'll try to do some research and expand this article. Symantecs

0

713bbf7b5c519bfb

" You know, I'm leaning more and more towards Roger's opinion here: knowing what we know about the sources, I think it's implied that IBM re-invented DC, but it's not unambiguous, and it's really not such a critical point to this article. I think we should just say that IBM was aware of differential cryptanalysis but didn't publish it, at least in this article: the proper place to get into this in detail would be in the Data Encryption Standard article or the differential cryptanalysis article. juicetalk "

0

7140b6717f5abc82

July 2009 Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you.

0

714f397963adbd1a

My edits are personal opinion? What does that even mean? I was making my edits based on what I believe the guidelines currently say is correct. If I was wrong, I'd happily revert myself. I'm not sure what about my edits you don't feel is respectful, but you seriously need to look more closely into this guideline. ♠Dil

0

7156a282d8eabab3

" Change from dormant to failed I'm a bit concerned about this edit; is it really accurate to describe PWD as ""failed?"" I thought that its proponents just never got around to pushing this proposal with enough alacrity for a true consensus to emerge one way or the other. "

0

715e98258ab039e6

Do not use: I agree this template should not be used, because it will eventually break due to MediaWiki limitations. I tried adding more episodes to it, and it broke all the pages that used it.

0

715ea88ef650a6aa

Reply. Check the dates, I was blocked for that incident for a week. -

0

71679d748f2818a9

indeed, he is not surprised that that your fascist state was repeatedly elected několirktá as the biggest problem in the path to world peace actually, you stupid, patriotic, manipulative bastards should kill, burn, your entire floor level to the ground and even sprinkle with salt ... or one day destroy the entire world ...

0

716e6ba37fba42d2

":::# You're an idiot. Throwing a punch is a causal act. The causal actor in the case of words is the recipient, not the speaker, and certainly not the words. Again, you're an idiot. The purpose is clear: to not have the noticeboard connected with her/his account. I'm under no obligation to kiss the asses of market fundamentalists and beg them if I can edit ""their"" articles to replace fantasy with reality. The fact that I'm the one being pigpiled here, instead of them, is quite telling. Telling bullies who visit my talk page to fuck off is not disruptive to the project. "

1

0

1

0

1

0

71701fa7f7c661ca

I've had a quick look, it's certainly a major improvement. Although 10 years old I think it would be better to use the 2001 census figures for population with an explanation that this is likely to have risen to the 2009 mid year estimates. The stats in the table seem to be a mixture of the 2001 census and more recent estimates, and a source next the every figure in the table seems a bit overkill and a little distracting - would it be better to just use the 2001 census and have one reference at the top of each column (similar to the Somerset table)? I also think it would be useful to have an additional column in the table for England or Great Britain so the figures can be compared to the national averages. These aren't major issues - let me know what you think.

0

71715ceb827eb079

Protection Request Just a heads up. Feel free to put in your .02 cents Endless Dan

0

71781e06eeae6369

Happy for you to go ahead. Would we need to keep textual description for read aloud software?

0

717e0373043b6514

Then Assert Your Case; Please Do... You write: But that aside, in reading the section above this one, you almost sound as if you wish to be blocked. I am not afraid, as you administrators appear to want us to be, in FEAR. I have found you to be, and I'm not suprized, to be in Chomskyen, 'NAKED.' You are without clothes and, truth is, YOU, are afraid. See, Truth ... terror ...

0

717f486fb4dbd164

" Hello Snowcat.ntas, and thank you for your contribution to the article. First, please note that I have re-inserted information that I assume you do not have a problem with. Second, rather than getting into an edit war with you, I would like to propose that we come to consensus about what we're each talking about in reference to this dispute. The article content I believe you are disputing is the information about the wolf siting. Is that correct? Can we agree on that? I would suggest that since the information you have repeatedly deleted is verifiable by reliable sources, it is legitimate for inclusion. The fact that it is testimony from the US Senate makes it notable to the article's topic, no matter what the topic is. You are correct that it should be included in the other article; however, it is notable to this one as well. A way to resolve what you state is ""clearly biased and politically motivated to reflect an anti-environmental view"" is to provide a reliably sourced counter-perspective. I look forward to your response, and to working out a solution to this dispute. Thanks! • Freechild'''sup?'' "

0

717f6930af943c80

" Invitation I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B; and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards "

0

7182e88245e73fe7

You twats know fuck all about anything.

1

0

1

0

1

0

71839a274c506959

, one which concerned

0

7183dc5423a6c751

fuck you Hey fuck you! Uncle Grandpa is actually Kurt Cobain! Pizza Steve, Mr. Gus, Belly Bag and Giant Flying Realistic Tiger are all the other band members so I will ask politely may you please fuck off. 118.93.190.23

1

0

1

0

1

0

718629963d505de1

Maybe you should be civil towards other people and you'll get the same back. Acting like an admin doesn't get across to people very well.

0

71866f0fb21d4cd4

" The VERY Naive Perspective This was stated: 'There was no implication that ALL VNR's are propaganda. If SOME VNRs are demonstrably propaganda, which I infer is undisputed, then the statement is factually correct and ideologically neutral.' Separated into two concepts: a) that ""There was no implication that ALL VNRs are propaganda."" -and- b) ""If SOME VNRs are demonstrably propaganda ... then the statement is factually correct and ideologically neutral."" In regards to the first:- A Video ""News"" Release by the government, which is ( as they, a priori, are ) intended to create the appearance of congruity for an idea which aids the government through causing an apparent or actual concordance between the beliefs of those in control and those being controlled is, by definition, propaganda. In regards to the second:- Is the statement that the labeling of VNR's is an ideologically neutral act? It would not be, as, through labeling it, one is categorizing it ideologically. Please do not misunderstand, IMHO VNR's are an advanced form of embedded propaganda which elegantly use the psycholinguistic concept contained in the idea ""The Fish do not see the Water"". In Communication Studies, Propaganda Studies, even Neuro-Linguistic Programming NLP( which, while it is a controversial system, is based on common-sense ""slight of mind"" techniques.) the Sandwich Formula of: /true statement -> statement intended to be perceived as true -> true statement/ is being used here. Example: 6 o'clock news, tired Americans sit down to eat and watch the news. In the middle of verifiable and true information segments a VNR is placed, so the end effect of 'Rain tomorrow //-> VNR Information //-> Gas is up by 1 cent' is to believe 3 new facts, not 2 and one to question. My 2 cents, "

0

71869001fc63e43c

" Bad LOGIC =Progressivism On the progressivism and economic progressivism pages some editors have deleted criticism on the following grounds. 1. The article needs to be expanded first. 2. The article needs to be improved first. 3. Criticsm section puts undo weight on negatives. Well I say this logic leads to only one outcome, the articles purpose is to argue the point which is a violation of NPOV. 1. If the article needs expanding, expand it...criticism also helps expand. THe purpose of the article is to report all the facts not just the facts in favor of the article title. 2. The article is improved just by including a criticism section. Again, THe purpose of the article is to report all the facts not just the facts in favor of the article title. Deleting the criticism on the grounds that the article needs to be improved suggests the only way to improve the article is by aruging the point. Again, violation of NPOV. 3. Criticism does not put undo weight on negatives. Again the purpose of the article is not to argue the point of progressivism but to report the facts. 4. The fact is criticism exists and it should be reported. The criticism section included an AUthor and his book. 5. The addition of a pov original research counter arguement to the criticism further proves my point (And you can look on the history page) that they believe the purpose of the article is to argue the point rather than report the facts. All were poorly reasoned excuses to delete material they objected to. These editors are not trying to preserve the integrity of wikipedia or be ""Fair and balanced"" they are simply trying to push a leftist political objective by censoring any alternative regardless of the source. Classical Liberalism Editor Slizor has deleted several sections and paragraphs which were cited and refrenced, including quotes from economists and think tanks on various things which Slizor has expressed disagreement with. Dispite these citations, he deleted the material on the grounds that what he believes is the truth does not fit the facts provided. He claims, dispite contradictory evidence and no evidence of his own that classical liberals have nothing in common with libertarians. That classical liberals are not inheritors of liberalism. and that modern liberals do not have a different understanding of liberalism than 200 years ago. Furthermore, he makes the original research pov claim that classical liberals are more like elitist Republicans than libertarians (for which he has NO CITATION, and this is one of the grounds for the deletions). This is just another example of the abuse some wiki editors will make up in order to push their own agenda. The logic is poor. The citation is non existant. The pov is massive. Slizor's edit needs a massive revert...and he needs to be drawn away from his computer and beaten with Milton Friedman and FA Hayek books until he understands the quotes from their books that he deleted. ( )"

0

718cecd95c96f5d1

"Trolling is not a harassment, its a definition of a person who keeps posting non-sense on websites and that's what you are doing with ""citation needed"". FYI: I will continue to keep on ""harassing"" you until you leave Rap artist articles. "

0

719301b706e060a7

I'd need to put a bit of thought, and get some consensus, as to how best to start working on the article again. I'd be very tempted to revert to the last version I edited, in 2008. Since then User:Amideg (Ami = Anne Marie de Grazia) has taken out a lot of the stuff that attests to notability and put in a lot of useless fancruft. But there might have also been some useful edits in the meantime, so it all needs unpacking. If I'm not simply adding to the article right now, that's why, plus I don't want to spend time on it again if it's for the chop.

0

7195ff8c4bdb2c1b

" السلام عليكم. First, thank you for your good faith and contribution, but unfortunately your are making a huge mistake. ""...or who recents ancestors lived in Morocco.."", that's not the correct definition, that's YOUR definition. You lack an understanding of basic terms. Please read the following articles: Jews, ethnic group and ethnoreligious group. Moroccan Jews is not an ethnic group, Jews ARE the ethnic group. Moreover, Israelis ""of Moroccan origin"" don't fit the definition of ""Moroccans"". I have noticed you have already encountered objections from other users, and yet you proceed with this mistake instead of discussing it. Please do not continue with this, or i'll have to report you. Thank you and best regards."

0

7197a9b15b3d0662

Happy Diwali!! Happy Diwali to you!!May the Force be with you! ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)

0

71992692d42b5869

"== Some baklava for you! == Hi "

0

719934ffcd9fbbd7

And using Valentino to argue that there is no connection between communism and mass killings is pretty creative in itself, as he repeatedly argues for the connection.

0

71accb8658c6d3b0

Oppose per WP:PROT and WP:OWN. Both of these trump a proposal that hasn't even achieved consensus support yet.

0

71addfded891a4d9

I'd like to see some pics of the new Gunningsville Brige

0

71af2dc3aa135b02

" To Sandstein, No you are absolutely wrong talk pages are deleted here is Wikimedia's stance on the matter User and talk pages, and their subpages, and other non-article pages that no others have substantively contributed to and whose existence does not impact the project, may be courtesy blanked or deleted.. When you are an administrator you have responsibilities that includes upholding Wikimedia's legal policy's. I have asked for 'ALL' of my user space to be deleted and that includes my talk page. I WILL be taking legal action personally against you if not fulfilled and believe me this is not a threat it is an absolute promise, look you don't know me one bit my Dad bought me a house when I was 21 I now have three cars and a boat and an interstate apartment and enough money and time on my hands to defend my privacy which I will. Ecoleetage's page was deleted, and I have seen it done many times before. Don't try and be the tough guy here you will NOT succeed outside Wikipedia.org. So I leave it up to you. I advise you not to be stupid here. Believe me I am more than happy to go ahead with my threats just fucking try me you piece of shit. I have already started the ball rolling by contacting and paying for lawyers before writing this. Now you may be thinking ""oh it's a courtesy thing we don't have to do it"" now that wording does not stand up in court the fact is Wikimedia offer this courtesy and I am asking for it you are nobody to go against Wikimedia's legal policys. Now I've reached my level of dealing with Wikimedia. I warn you one last time do it or your fucked. Jack In122.49.151.145 "

0

71afdcdf01608672

She continues to serve on the Commission while awaiting Senate confirmation.

0

71be3c945c8016bb

Why don't you tell that to thejadefalcon! He doesn't seem to be aware of that rule, or are wiki editors excluded from it?71.174.142.108

0

71bf6ff9f896b2c5

I disagree with you. In terms of Glass-Steagal there are only investment banks or savings banks. Savings banks include 'savings and loan' banks. The difference is who backs the money (FDIC vs. FSLIC). Glass-Steagal removed the barrier between investment banks and savings banks (including savings and loans). THC Loadee

0

71c50a033c67ecac

You appear to have an eye, for quality Art Work. (Richard) Keep the faith

0

71c548987d11cdfc

" angelous there should be a mention of angelous, the dude who could impersonate jay-z and made all those mixtape songs over jay-z beats. 'Lost Ones' And Jay's relationship with Beyonce The article says that ""Many fans disputed this analysis, claiming that the song references a previous relationship with actress Rosario Dawson and that her burgeoning career ended the romance."" That's not what I heard. I read somewhere that the verses were about Beyonce but from years earlier. at the time of Kingdom Come, Beyonce was 25, but the verses refer to the girl being 23. This shows that the verse was written after the black album, and could have been used for Kingdom come. They are clearly back together in Kindom Come, and the song could have been from a rough patch in '04-'05. Both theories are possible and should be included in the article Also known as His only other names are Jigga, Jiggaman, Hov, Hova, and JayHova thats about it i'm taking the rest off —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "

0

71c9c030053af3fa

Why this article is locked out?

0

71cca74d5b296c7c

It's obviously not a personal attack. By posting this you admit you didn't read my entire message and i indicated that I have nothing against him as a person, but I have very strong and reasonable doubts about the truthfullness of the things he is editing. By accusing me of personal attacks you prove that you are very obstinate against me. Why are you doing this? I feel i'm oppressed by you. The one who is attacking is you. I don't want to hurt nobody, this is obviously not the point. I am a peaceful man. I just want to discuss. Are you able to defferenciate between derogatory statements and discussion?

0

71d2d1bd509429f0

Did he ever publicly declare his religion ? Then it should be referenced. He comes from a culture that clearly separated Jews as a blood line and Judaists as a religion. The fact that he chairs Jewish social organizations is as relevant as his business partnership with Reverend Moon. If the statement on religion is unsourced, it should be removed.

0

71d3aa21eb0916ee

":: Still stuck at work for an hour or so. On the plus side, there has been a betting pool at work to see how long before I got in trouble for some of my own stupidities. I'm out $5. exhales I'll be the first to admit I crossed the line. Firsfron is an admin I can solidly respect for never being full of shit. I feel like blocks are an affair of honor if you fuck up, and you know you did, and you did it anyway, you have to do the time. The statements I made were personal attacks sadly, depressingly, they were also right and there are probably lots of people who feel the same way but who have enough sense not to say so on-wiki. I should apologize to some admins for not sticking them on the excellent and good list. I aught to apologize to some of the admins on the bad list for posting my opinion. I'm bad at apologies. I apologized to Kelly Martin (and damn me, that was hard for me to swallow) because , no matter how I hated what she said, she was right. brightens Still, you're my friend, and I do appreciate what everyone has said here and on that RfC by CoolCat and on ANI. This , however, remains an excellent example of why I don't wanna be an admin. Talk| "

0

71d67f873a07d99d

The Alaska Wild have a logo on their arenafan site (see external links Could you please put it in? Thanks! M. Burmy 13:45 CDT 1 July 2006 (UTC)

0

71d6ab5e66e9b5d7

Governor of the Bank of Jamaica.Im jamaican and i know for a fact that Mr.latibeaudiere resigned on october 30 2009 please look it up yes yes it does i want all info on my county to be factual,NO foreign can lie to me about a place i have lived all my GD life!

0

71d88f0f6ff253c9

Geography Category Thank you for informing me of that miscategorization. It has been corrected. mappychris

0

71defe0f1f13a2bc

MBizanz likes to PNP...BB only

0

71e116bfa31429d8

Theres no such thing as nuetral, people cannot be divided straight down the middle, so I will present my beliefs as such... I am a holocaust REVISIONIST (not a holocaust denier). I am a nationialist (Australia) I dislike globalisation and companies in general I dislike christianity and all forms of mass religion I believe men act like woman nowadays and it sickens me Racism is healthy and human Our Id (frued terminology) is more important than our superego I am more elite than any nerd on the net

0

71e9501a09c02adb

Your image on the Windows Vista page Since I saw your image on the Windows Vista page, I have been looking everywhere for the desktop background you were using in that screencap, but I can't find it! Is it available for download online? Please let me know! Thanks

0

71ebb9ba83165f2a

i think dapi misquoted glantz so i want to read the sources. i this false? and fact is that german units were back soon an started pounding russian units so i think dapi highlighted something which is not as cool as he thinks. value for the reader....

0

71f0615f6dffb2fb

T-90 armor Please discuss. There are contradictions from the available sources. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t-90.htm This website claims T-90A protection as follow; vs APFSDS: 550 mm + 250-280mm with Kontakt-5 = 800-830mm vs HEAT: 650 mm + 500-700mm with Kontakt-5 = 1,150-1,350mm. This means that against APFSDS, 550mm is for T-90A Basic Armor, without Kontakt-5, and 250~280mm is for Kontakt-5. If you add this up, the sum is 800~830mm for the whole T-90A Armor. doesn't know anything about what ERA is and how it works. And now he is the one who vandaling the article.

0

71f4c9a07e5e4e3a

This is your last warning. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen

0

71f5afd82dcd5c0a

I am sorry, but I cannot find any differences of me wikihounding or personally attacking somebody or anybody. Could you please be so kind and provide the exact differences of me wikihounding and personal attacking somebody. Please just take them from that very AN/I report and post them here.

0

71f85b7a3aa6ce0f

" Looks a bit spammy, indeed. I have inserted them into COIBot, lets monitor. It looks like a real journal, but seems to be quite COI. T C "

0

71fada8aa8f7e0e9

" Barnstar! The Special Barnstar Thank you for commenting on the punitive nature of my block extention. The original block was probably useful in reminding me to guard my tongue. Although disagreeing with my record or methods is irksome personally (for you too probably), you still stood up for what was appropriate in this scenario. Thank you "

0

72012c1633282a1f

FFS What am I doing wrong? I'm trying to help sort better information here and it seems as if you hate and dissagree with me here. What is wrong with it? Can you please explain. I'm not vandalizing or ruining pages.

0

720613cddf648bed

" I have found the holy grail Browsing around on the Louisiana state library, and I've come across the holy grail of signs. It's got cutout US routes, cutout diamond Louisiana routes (with a black top, ironically enough), curves and detours, and old fashioned stop signs. Makes me want to jump back in time for a week, steal some, then bring em back. [{File:LA_signs.svg]] "

0

7206c06bcd00f63a

Its too messy for them to touch. They were going to (touch it) in 1850, but backed off. The NSW and Victorian Governors finally gazetted/fixed the curly bit of the boundary in March or so this year, but no one will go near the other. Its all fully documented in various places. Alas, I am blocked from contributing by that totally psycho playschooler, Artkos, so had better start taking notice so he gets his jollies today ... eh?

0

7213c3afe948d001

2010's Arthur Rubin i want to thank but i like to fuck you if want to erase my edits on 2010's go and i say you is fuck you you are fucking shit and idiot.

1

0

1

0

1

0

721546c57a477087

(Although in fairness I did not start that page as it existed before as a redirect to Oskar Klein)

0

721adadc6a698db7

Thank you for experimenting with the page Evan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. + R/W

0

722786f971abeef9

" Notability of Aislin Band A tag has been placed on Aislin Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (Talk) "

0

722b7119ffca1c31

Thanks dude! As soon as I'm unblocked, I'll imitate your signature. ;-) 74.58.27.35

0

723342857bd3e73a

" If you're going to toss around numbers of ""real"" scientists, I will point out that there has been some question as to how many of the ""thousands of scientists"" involved in the IPCC consensus process are actually scientists working in the area of climate change. If you're going to make ad hominem attacks on the opponents of global warming, it might be interesting to analyze the credentials of the scientists on both sides of the issue. I wonder if anyone has actually done this analysis for both sides of the debate. I think it's unlikely, given the partisan nature of the debate. It's far more likely that each side of the debate assumes their ""experts"" are all wonderful and importantant scientists, while the other side's experts are obviously incompetent and bought off. Global Warming Non-Believers I have no idea how the article should be updated for the following information. Any suggestions would be appreciated. However, 100 scientists are on record as strongly opposing the conclusions of the IPCC. I wouldn't consider this to be ""only a few."" They published an open letter to Ban Ki-Moon, available at http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164002. Interestingly, there are also scientific claims made within this letter (such as the claim that there has been no global warming since 1998) that probably also need to be addressed in the article. I don't have the time or expertise to amend the article to include this information in a fair and balance manner, but if it's not included I'd argue that the article is misleading at best. "

0

724021b721f3296b

No, I meant: for this year, how many 1 year terms versus 2 year terms would there be if I appoint to 9/9 tranches versus automatic 2 year terms for everyone in the top-up to 18?

0

7241902573618097

Can't believe you locked that guy's talk page. Surely a woman of your interlect, who studied at the same institution as ghandi, realises the importance of dialogue.

0

7246d7a7de008235

GOOD RIDDANCE. GET LOST. PUNK.

1

0