id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6d45d0a1c3e2e7d8 | "
I also happened to come across this but it doesn't give too much away - perhaps Waymat cares to expand? http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2006/enfield.htm - ""Rau denied threatening to sue Joyce for this sum, saying he had merely called his attention to the precedent of Mitchell MP Kris Hanna's successful action against outgoing Bright MP Wayne Matthew."" What successful action was taken against Wayne Matthew? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d492c74e7777085 | I like what you did. Great job! Thanks!
I especially like the fact that people can understand all the factors - the big picture, the individual versions, as well as the controversies ... all clearly labeled and easily available. Thanks again! (Talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d4a875d0805e3e3 | Here are your four:
1st,
2nd,
3rd, and
4th. I've made three, and won't do another. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d4fb7624649afe7 | (UTC)
The V comes from Aviation (cf. AVB Aviation Logistics Support Ship) 02:21, 21 Jan 2005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d5015dd6e9c2c7b | This is answer is way too late, so sorry for that. In the page 'cause' section talks about body's response to the stress on bones. more stress means more bones density, less stress means less bone density. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d521c05e77db638 | I find it extremely alarming that someone would remove a qualifier warning that something isn't entirely clear, thereby making it appear to be entirely clear when it isn't ... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d594a7011e66f2d | Further reply on my talk page. – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d6706565963660f | "
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear - if a page is a copyright violation, the only possible action is to throw it all away and start again. D " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d6d8095a432754e | My mistake, then. See you around. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d70cc77fa96779c | Request for arbitration
Request for Arbitration
You are a party in a request for an Arbitration: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#.3CCatholic_Church_and_Renaming.3E Gimmetrow | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d78028acef46765 | "
The album cover is fucking atrocious. Gaga is simply throwing out random ideas. But then, I love how kickass the music is on ""Judas"". The production is the best I've heard among all songs releaed this year. And woooof, ""Judas"" cleanup was hectic. — (talk2me) " | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d7e9944aaed24c2 | "::::Check out what has written to the admins to defend himself ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Woohookitty, look for "" I need some help ""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d8511ca5bea74c2 | The answer to why the issue had not come up before is simply that the previous reviewers either did not check or did not notice. I actually did not delete the draft, I'm not an administrator and cannot do so. What I did do is notice the copyright violation and flag the text for an administrator to review. Your draft was largely copied from his official company biography at http://abfsg.com/Pages/our-people.html
You cannot reuse text from elsewhere on Wikipedia, it is a copyright violation and would be illegal for us to host it. Articles must be based on, and referenced to, what has been written about the subject in reliable independent sources, not copied from elsewhere with sources thrown in to show notability. If you wish, you can ask the administrator who deleted it for a copy of the draft, in order to retrieve the sources, and you are perfectly welcome to submit a new draft that consists of material you wrote. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d8559607fa3a492 | At one time, I think it said the Crosby/Malkin era, which may be a more descriptive heading. The rest of the headings seem to be a little unwieldy in my opinion, so some rewording or restructuring may be in order at some point. Take care. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d8dadf5e4d919d7 | im not gonna kiss ass theyre lying bout me so theyr liars. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6d914a2dbc3ed69b | Thanks, but please don't vandalize the page next time. 21:53, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d93114cdce5cfcd | "
Proposal
Look all I am saying is that the term ""Iranian"" is a very loose term and people can get easily confused when they see this. Iranic would be a better term to use. Nontheless, there is no doubt that the Kurdish language is a bit similar to other languages such as Persian but there is also a difference as well. I am speaking as a Kurd myself. There is evidence that the Kurds have the highest chance out of all the other ethnic groups of being descendants of the Medes, all one has to do is look at lingustics. Although, it is also important to know that the Kurds have been in the middle east for a very very long time, and there have been many other empires/people as well. There have also been, for example, claims that Kurds are also descendants of the Gutians. It all boils down to what you believe, but to say that the Kurds are an Iranian people, is sort of going overboard.
Kurds have been mentioned for a very longtime by many different people, including the Sumerians!
Nonetheless, I think there should be a change. I sort of agree with the Proposal above but I believe it can be better. Heres what I think should be written
Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East that inhabit adjacent parts of Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syira known as Kurdistan. The Kurds speak a language known as Kurdish, which form a subgroup of the NorthWestern Iranian languages. The Kurds are known to be an Iranic people because of close linguistic and cultural ties with other Iranians. The Kurds are also known to be descendants of the Medes, according to many scholars.
Somewhere along those lines. Saying that Kurds are an ""Iranian ethnic group"" is is vague, confusing, and somewhat mis-leading. What I wrote is a bit more clear and I wrote why they are considered an Iranic people with the sentences supporting it. Notice how I also said a language known as Kurdish. I do not know on what insane consensus that people decided it should be ""Kurdish language(s)."" Kurdish is one language which is mainly based of two dialects, that are spoken by almost all Kurds. Those two dialects are Kurmanji and Sorani, both of which are highly similar. All Kurds regard their language as one. I am a Kurdish Sorani speaker and I can understand a Kurmanji speaker perfectly. Kurds in Turkey, Syria, and Half of Iraq speak Kurmanji. Then the other Half of Iraqi Kurdistan speak Sorani, with Kurds in Iran speaking Kurdish Sorani as well. There are also a few other dialects such as Hawrami which is spoken by about 10% of Kurds. Nonetheless, the Kurdish language is one language with 2 main dialects, both of which are highly similar to each other.
Bawer1 Bawer" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6d9c3a7bc13793d1 | 2006 (UTC)
Well, I finally got around to doing this, and the result is at the bottom of my user page. I've made it possible to automatically update, but I'm sure it would need much more development before being good enough for the relevant page here. Comments are welcome. 17:44, 9 February | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6da137d8e76dfe14 | . Now dash off to the next misunderstanding | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6da3cdade422a1b8 | "
(1)Paul: ""All my information derives from reliable sources"" You have yet to cite even one either here ,or on the authorship page,or on your home page.Even if you have one the fact that you continue to fill up someone else's page for six weeks without either bothering to excuse yourself or explain yourself constitutes harassment.
""All you do is snip at an established scholar"" I can't snip at an established scholar because after weeks of verbal regurgitation you haven't named one.And if you ever do the proper place to place that name on the Pericles section of the authorship discussion.Do you have difficulty in remembering what you have been writing ,Paul?
""I AM NOT VERY INTERESTED in whether Nelson makes some possibly poor translations from Latin. He is a reliable source for Wikipedia."" Paul,Nelson has apparently made over four hundred poor translations ,all,on the most merciful interpretation ,due to the initial fact that he has never bothered to learn Latin before publishing his biography.Due to one of these four hundred mistranslations he has brought a false accusation of murder.But you are not interested because malicious defamatory information ,according to your interpretation of the laws of evidence ,can still be ""a reliable source for Wickipedia"".This may be true,this be false, but why don't you have the guts to come right out and say what you mean,man. Your pal,Nishidamia did,""This is not about the truth,"" he wrote,and,for him ,as apparently, for you,it isn't. Never has been,may be never will be.
You claim ""the view that Shakspere wrote Shakespeare is undermined because an American woman falsely claimed she was raped a few years ago."" No,we are discussing an English department that knowingly aided and abetted a false rape claim and used every effort in its considerable power to pressure other academics to join them in a knowing and conscious fraud which nearly lead to the deaths of more than one falsely accused students.One of these individuals is former head of the PMLA and claims to be an expert on Shakespeare.
You are claiming,whether or not you are deliberately faking your readers on this point , that all these murderous creeps are ""reliable sources"" under the rules of
Wikipedia and if they publish their ""evidence"" on this blog whether on Crystal Mangum or Swilly Shakspere it must be accepted under the rules of Wikipedia. and that you ""are not very interested"" if they are any more or less truthful than the other crank Strats who obfuscate rational discussion here.
I see the ""charge"" brought against me is that I correctly and charitably described you comments here as ignorant.
By the way you keep ducking my question here as to the identity of a black magician who keeps addressing me and claims to be majoring in iconography at the University of Sussex.
Now get off my page and take all your crappy posts with you.I get one more ignorant letter from you and I am(with the permission of the editorship) going to dump them all right back on your site where your fellow lunatics(if any) can doubtless better savor the fruits of your accumulated wisdom.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6da62056c0ea6ff5 | This section recently added is entirely unsourced? Subjective, based only on opinion. We just require a reliable source specifically stating these points. It also seems irrelevant to health psychology too? I will leave these comments here if other editors wish to discuss. If no discussion I think someone needs to boldly delete this entirely unsourced section to the article. Thoughts please? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dab8cabef8b8cb9 | Proto-Indo-European (PIE) notation as qualified linguists themselves recognize it
You're obviously confused between phonetics as found in the study of, say, modern languages and the proper representation of sounds in protolanguages. PIE notation is not necessarily representative of actual pronunciation and PIEists are clear to make that point in many many primers on the topic. Try for example Indo-European Language and Culture by Fortson. Notice how on page 51 which I kindly linked for you in this text, there is absolutely no use of your imaginary notation. So get off your egotistical know-it-all high horse, read a book and bite the bullet that you're just plain ignorant of basic comparative linguistics, which is all too typical on the children-maintained Wikipedia. Thanks for your inevitable cooperation in advance. May you have more interest in learning than fruitless editing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6db0e9e06bbd0f17 | Mate, Why did you revert my user talk page? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6db3101fac72a3db | "
Smile
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile ==
== Smile | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dc00d6e478f15cc | I am the gatekeeper to the truth about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I work all hours of the night and day instantly reverting any edits to JFK assassination related pages that might point to the actual facts of the matter, especially those that do not wash with the official US Government lie. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dc8ef52010d5c3a | ":Hi there. Thanks for your concern on the matter. I can assure you this has little to nothing to do with ""mathematician vs physicist"" as you have proposed; it, instead, has everything to do with Linas incompetence. It is univerally acknowledged that a complex function SQUARED can be negative. This is nothing new or exciting: consider f(x) = i if you don't believe me. The square modulus of a wavefunction is what the probability defined in the context of wavefunctions.
Remarkably, someone who pretends he is so knowledgeable in mathematics and physics - indeed, even stating to me that I do not know Quantum Mechanics and hence should not edit articles - could make such a terrible fumble. Without saying it for effect, his lack of understanding between the square modulus and the square of a complex number if a lack of understanding of day one material: literally, my Complex Analysis book (by Conway, Graduate Texts in Mathematics series) covers it in the first section, and again literally, my mathematical physics course as an undergraduate covered this on the first day of class.
Linas, you are incompetent. People tend to make errors at the periphery of their knowledge. As it turns out, the edge of your knowledge is day one in complex variables. Please refrain from editing articles on quantum mechanics and mathematics. You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dc920eb4787fadc | Having one article for both Vancouver Whitecaps teams goes against every other Wikipedia sports article. These are two separate teams. The only thing connecting them is a common name. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dcb9ae06a4c9f44 | "
If the point of the house style is that ""an adherence to conventions widely used in the genre are critically important to credibility"", and we are choosing not to follow these conventions widely used in the genre, what is that actual logic? (let's chat) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dcc2e80d4d13fad | Hey what is wrong with you greeks all standing on line to write on my talk page. The truth really hurts sometimes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dcd397fd0f63fef | |listas = Broadway Project | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dcfb0da18720002 | Barack Obama is mentally retarted. He is not fit to be president. he is the worst president so far, that we have had in our presidents. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6dcfbf206e8f65d7 | Some of the sources are linked directly to wesnoth.org, which usually isn't proper. Try to find some good third party sources to use as references. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dd0426b1fb63a10 | "
Update
I've replaced the dispute tag to better reflect the dispute here. If there is more than just one single source, A good compromise would be to include a range of numbers as oppose to revert warring to include a single source. But the sources would still have to be reliable. I'll check the sources when I get the chance and propose a reliable range. Until then it would be very nice if people stop reverting things. The totallydisputed tag is there and people would probably read the talk page before believing the numbers. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dd8ca03b2727a25 | Sorry. I nominated this article for deletion but have totally forgotten my password. This is a page about a candidate for elected office who has no other notability. There is clear precedent that candidates for office are not sufficiently notable unless there is some other claim to notability. I don't think any other claim is sufficiently asserted here. 86.144.83.215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ddba766c7373a2d | 1|Archive 1]] - up to 17 May 2007}}
Help
Heya, is adding a lot of spam to various articles like Sengunthar, Mudaliar, etc. I engaged him in discussion and proved him wrong at least 3 times. I believe he also uses aliases and alternate accounts like and . Also, he spawns duplicate articles like Chola and sengunthars (a dupe of Sengunthar). Recently, he deleted a whole section of the Mudaliar article . Can you warn him or give the article some kind of protection? If you cannot address these issues please direct me to the appropriate authorities who can help alleviate my concerns?
Cheers, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ddd1b09ff9a1b9a | How about just see you in 2 weeks or so? Because I'm not even going to log in really unil then. Darkwatch was cool and speaking of KOF I've got the original The King of Fighters '94 done previously. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6def14fb5df3d211 | Keep. In time, there will probably be more information on development (Iwata Asks, interviews, etc.). It is also important to note that Ocarina of Time is one of our longer articles already, and covering Ocarina of Time 3D in it as well could possibly make it excessively long. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6def2278a1eebcc0 | Anna, I put my name down for the areas I would like to focus my attention however I think that perhaps collaborating more due to our small group is a good idea. Also, yes I still want to do images but like you said I think some preliminary research will give us better grasp on what is available to us. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6df4f8ab932d6fad | Two for closure at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 November 30
Global University Ranking and Global University Ranking, 2009 are both ripe for closure today, and it isn't so clear cut that I want to bang the gavel alone. I have failed to attract more attention to the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#Global_University_Ranking in spite of publicizing it at WT:C and WT:COPYCLEAN. (The conversation primarily consists of a contributor who says the list is creative and unusable and another who's claiming WP:OTHERSTUFF.) I'm not quite sure what to do with it. We haven't had a good debate about lists in quite some time, and the admin who added the most to the last one has gone inactive. ) Are you able to help out? (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6dfa062c0af2e515 | Please do not arbitrarily make edits without providing basis for change. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e019e391650cfcc | Honestly the way wiki is treating this is a JOKE
a. I could have cited NEWS SITES but since when is a news site worthy of an academic cite?
b. if the person that wanted PEER REVIEW felt like it, he would have sought it 20 years ago, HE CHOSE NOT TO DO IT, but none the less his work is known and was mentioned in many math related 'forums' and most ignored it.
c. Only the recent 2012 open source test of the work PROVED the 30Mod algorithm is a major thing in math, again, GITHUB is a programmers resource and it was not until a computer used the actual 30Mod algorithm that it was shown to be a 'big thing' and since then some news sites have covered it, but I chose not to cite them due to IMO they are not NPOV. But none the less they covered the story.
d. The FACT is a major computer site where programmers have free reign to challenge any claims exists and for over two years not one programmer challenged the findings.
e. so what if the person that discovered it works outside of academia and has no regard for normal 'peer review' the fact is he has no peers if you ask some in academia that know of his work, and I am one of those people that know of the work and how brilliant the work is.
Now to summarize, we have a bunch of pags about primes on wiki, and even pages created after his discovery that USE his discovery (ie. the sieve of Atkin 60Mod work is his work discussed in the public forum and usenet math and physics forums is where he chose to discuss his amazing work.
So now you have 2004 sieve of Atkin using a 60Mod algorithm, guess what that was in his 1995 paper. So does wiki acknowledge that? No. And i didn't even bother to waste my time of the 60 mod algorithm since the big deal as you are saying is the PyPrimes test and I cited that very well, it's a program created in Python, I cited the wiki python page, then I cited Github for both PyPrimes and the PyPrimes testing.
Now while MATH is m forte, I am sufficient enough in computer skills to understand what Github is and to understand how to read the speed tests and the prime spirals smoked every algorithm there is. Now anyone can download python (which I have done) and download pyprimes (which I have done) and run the tests. Guess what just like a math experiment, it is duplicated.
So GITHUB and the tests which are not 'new' should be enough to begin a wiki page on this truly amazing discovery in math.
I myself became aware of the first paper in 1995, as did others in aademia. Recently I became aware of 'news sites' running stories citing what I copied, the links to the Github tests.
While some here can say well it's not AMA, so what, in the world of primality testing primes spirals as per the PyPrimes results shows PRIME SPIRALS are a big deal.
Now I tried to be NPOV in giving all sides of the story, Adoni has a valid 1995 claim I can verify it and I chose not to. But I cited a Drexel Math forum and I could have cited many other math sites discussing his 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime work in the 1990's. Is this signficant? You bet it is since 60Mod prime sieve aka Atkin sieve is 20004 so his 60mod prime work is well before it.
Now the Github tests mentions 'croft spirals', that's due to in 2010 a person named croft registering a web site and ripping off the 1995 work. MY OPINION.
Now Croft can say all he wants that he found it playng his guitar or whatever he is claiming.
The fact is anyone can document Adoni with Prime theory from the 1990's saying 30mod, 60mod and 90mod is the key.
9 Years later sieve of atkin appears, well that's only a rehash of the adoni 60mod work from the 1990's. Yet no one is giving him credit.
2010 croft puts out his 30Mod work and its inserted into PyPrimes on Github and it smokes every major prime algorithm there is and all of them have pages on wiki as I cited.
So 2012 a work on Github verifies how important to primality the 30mod spirals are, but he says croft spirals, well guess what HelixQ is now out there and taking 100% credit for the 1995 work of Dr. Adoni.
My site to a Drexel math site from the 1990's mentioning 30Mod prime work (prime spirals) is a major cite, since Adoni could care less about the AMA or whatever, in all probability he will soon be nominated for a Nobel on his work, that is how important it is.
Think about it, not one prime algorithm could beat the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, none of them. On a computer creating primes all other algorithms are terribly slow. The only two fast generators from scratch are the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes and the PRIME SPIRALS, and the winner was Prime Spirals. Now I can cite recent news articles about it, laughing at academics it links to that said it was no big deal in the 1990's who now all look foolish due | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e01a95661ee5ade | Restoring prior edit so the article covers this issue. There is no proof that he was or wasn't, but some people thought he was gay-friendly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e03a311f8f0e9fc | My apologies, I hadn't intended that to happen and didn't notice. Thanks for fixing it for me | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e0cea6aeea7b882 | St Pancras and Islington Cemetery
In East Finchley has more people interred than any other cemetery in the U.K. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e0e184b5af13192 | "
The source also does not use the word develope. The source does say: ""The evidence for the Big Bang comes from many pieces of observational data that are consistent with the Big Bang."" and ""... many observations support the Big Bang ..."" (over alternatives). I dont quite see how, you manage to summarize that to: ""evidence has led to further development of the model"". I have replace the sentence with something that actually matches the source (using the word ""support"").R " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e1098ce24dc9797 | "
1. You can´t be ""Islamized"", there is no force in Islam, and Mehmed-pasha was Bosniak he was from Bosnia and was Bosniak ortodox does not mean Serb.
2. So you claim there were no Bosniaks before 1993? Are you a Serb nationalist perhaps? Bosniaks were in the Middle Ages, then in the Ottoman empire, then they became just ""Muslims"" and then again 4 real BOSNIAKS and Tvrtko was one!
3. SOC did not exist in Bosnia before 1918.
4. Bosnian Serbs are Bosniaks who becuse there orthodox started seeing them selfs as Serbs in the 19th century.
5. I am the best, nothin you can do go and rest." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e1409f974f1a941 | To the person who created this page:
Thanks for your work getting this article going! It sounds like an interesting film.
Please note that there is a really easy way to create internal link within Wikipedia just add two brackets, not one, on either side of the word you want to link.
Good luck with future editing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e15740f59fe24e7 | "
Just a heads up those people asking you to join a forum are not allowed to on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions, however do remember to put ""row span"" for only the athletes column not the event column please. Secondly, if there is not a sentence in the sport your updating on a nation page, can you write like a basic sentence like, Bermuda has qualified a team of six athletes. Thanks. TalkContributions " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e2c4ade0520cbf9 | "
Speedy deletion of Wei Weiguo
A tag has been placed on Wei Weiguo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bo " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e2d3428c7884684 | "
Essjay double standard
Editing Free Speech is not vandalism with a clearly identified section titled ""criticisms of the policy"". You failed to follow policies and failed to warn or revert. Also, are you a native cherokee speaker? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e2f8adf60dec8c9 | I also find it somewhat unimpressive that you closed bith discussions about abuse with comments directed at me rather than the problem of the abuse I submitted. Nicely played, no one wants to enforce abusive admins. And regardless of whether he used his tools abusively in this situation, he has done so many times in the past and he is an abusive editor as are the others I mentioned in the discussion. It would be nice if for once someone was actually willing to do something about that and their passive aggressive bullshit arguments and insults rather than persecute the submitter for being blunt when submitting them to ANI. They are saying the same things (that is calling me an asshole) they are just doing it in a different way. Typical for this site these days. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e2fa7d01c3c8e96 | "
Learn to respect the requests of other editors, and not comment on personal spaces when told so. This is called collegiality. The editor who reverted my edit in your favour is obviously a friend. No ""diff"" requireda simple gander of a talk page is all that is needed.
You reverted my restoration of the date for the dynasty's beginning here.
I don't need to start a discussion, I just need to continue it, which I have done both in edit summary and on talk. I have clearly engaged in discussion on article talk, as anyone can clearly see.By continuing to comment here rather than the talk page as I had already ask, you are digging an even deeper hole for yourself. Respect the requests of other editors to leave their private spaces alone. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e30027dc560d9c7 | I've read that over 9,000 times and this article qualified by those standards. If you need proof check out CWA on Facebook. It is a real group and Brad Sommer was in that group. Ask anyone in the entire city of Dayton who either CWA or Brad Sommer is and they'll tell you everything in this article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e328f232a31dd7d | Yeah, yeah, this IP is already silently blocked for 1 week, just because ONE EDIT after previous (24h) block expired.
And this is not a spam. Site in question is relevant and can be added under WP:EL rules, and this is not only my opinion. But I see you are trying to game the system now to remove it for good. That's good, actually! Please, add this link to blacklist, please, please! You will effectively censor it on all wikimedia projects AFAIK, so it will be quite funny to watch the ensuing drama. ;-) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e354dd33448d249 | "
Heh. I don't really care. I've made some good contributions to wiki. I fixed the unfixable ""unsolved problems in philosophy"" article, the bio for the poet Howard Nemerov, and little fixes to philosophy and math articles. Meanwhile, this clown goes around censoring any negative information about Topalov, regardless of how factually accurate, and I get banned for calling him an idiot? If they want to ban me, then so be it. Let them ban me for life for all I care. I'm happy to mock their ""decision"" and the inarticulate schlepp that is Dionyseus. This is the author of the ""pseudo-penis"" article, who's constantly embroiled in arbitration on some topic or another. The guy whose chief contribution to Wikipedia has been individual entries for every character in ""Dune"". If they'd rather have Dionyseus's intellectual contributions than mine, then I'd welcome the ban. I have to say, their ""civility"" rules show that they're more interested in having a hippy love-fest than actually getting facts straight. The chief ingredient to intellectual honesty, in my humble opinion, is a willingness to spot phonies and imbeciles for what they are. The guy can't even spell [Dionysus] properly, and he's going around editing encyclopedia articles. Pish. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e38093ef796ee6d | "
Approval Addiction
Isn't it a little hypocritical to undergo plastic surgery to be physically appealing and to obtain the approval of her audience but write a book about ""approval addiction""...???" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e4396b00d126e72 | Serious redundancy issues
There is substantial replication of text in this article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e4ed08e6a026c72 | Grizzly Adams had a beard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e4ff1e9fcd3e680 | INTEVIEW
ME: ARE YOU GAY?
ABE GAY DASHIEL: YES
ME: ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO ADMIT THAT TO EVERYONE?
ABE GAY: YES. IM GAY AND IM PROUD. MY, DO YOU LOOK GOOD TODAY. (moves chair close)
ME: WHAT THE F$UCK B!T(H GET AWAY FROM ME
ABE: YOU KNOW IM FAMOUS FOR RAPING MICHAEL JACKSON
ME: (coughs) OH REALLY. THATS INTERESTING
ABE: ThAT MEANS IM THE KING OF GAYS
ME: THATS RIGHT
ABE: HOORAY! IM A NAZI! GO KILL ME! I RAPED GEORGE BUSH! IM A NAZI! I TOLD HITLER TO DESTROY THE WORLD! AND I WISH HE DID!!
ME: OK. THAT YOU FOR THE INTERVIEW
DASHIEL: YOUR WELCOME! WANT TO HAVE S$X? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6e517af22cb82460 | Stop erasing the truth fag.'''
==
Headline text
==
Headline text
==
== | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e523490e48e4fd3 | "
Congratulations
100000 Edits Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
. Talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e549bb1d91b309b | Anti-catholicism
An anonIP added that Category to the article, I removed it since the movie never mentions catholicism in any way. If folks disagree with this move, please bring it here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e550e1df70aff19 | Please
Please delete my account. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e557e4e25e6468b | Why complain about neutrality when you could fix it...? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e59468634e9a356 | Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I see you may be a New Zealander (or at least, appear to be by your edits). There are several NZ related Wikipedia pages.
Portal:New Zealand
Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board
Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand
Adding {{User New Zealand}} to your userpage will list you as a New Zealander.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e5e9e7958ebb85f | January 2009 (UTC)
In Czech it is obvious. If you need some source: 147.231.23.163 15:24, 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e65b1a277bf13c3 | "==Conflict of Interest==
Please read Wikipedia's guidelines on COnflict of Interest. Your edit to the QDI article appears to be the type of material appropriate to a brochure or investor prospectus, not an Encyclopedia. In addition almost none of it is sourced to reliable independent secondary sources. C " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e6a7b965f7c350c | why you do not remove the vandalism protection on WP PXE's page.213.37.84.214 12:01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e6c59f574cf4024 | "Please read the following article carefully in order to understand the real world-wide recognised history
- As somebody else said, the ""nation of Transylvania"" DOES NOT EXIST, it is pure ROMANIA and Romanians! Therefore, we will tell some real history here. Within the chronicles of Herodotus , one may find that he described the Dacians(Getae) as the nation living within the present Romanian and Moldavian territory, including the part that is called Transylvania today, which means “beyond the forests”, after the Latin definition given by Romans and which consisted of the Carpathian Mountains and the Pannonian Plains. A more accountable map can be found here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Dacia_82_BC.png .. Therefore, the nation living there consisted of dacians, which were known as Geton (plural Getae) in Greek writings, and as Dacus (plural Daci) and Getae in Roman documents. The dacians were conquered, after great efforts, by the Romans and Dacia was transformed into a Roman Province. Following, it was a period of Romanization, period when the main Romanian people rose. As an answer to the Magyar origin, the history says that their starting point within the actual Hungary is related to the invasion of the Mongols ruled by Genghis Han and the Huns ruled by Attila within the European territory. After their settlement within the Pannonian Plains, the Hungarian people emerged, by mixing with the local populations. As a clear conclusion, one may say that nobody can contradict the written past or the great historians in terms of the origin of Dacians and the territory within they lived, called today Transilvania/Transylvania. The truth that has to be admitted is that Dacians/Getae were here as a nation BEFORE the Hungarian people came over and rose as a nationality. Moreover, NEITHER the Mongols and Huns NOR the actual Hungarians WERE here BEFORE the Romanization of Dacians, therefore they were not present before the emerging stage of the Romanian people. International history admits that the Hungarians appeared within today’s Hungary territory around the 9th century A.C. (according to Britannica) as an immigrating people coming from the actual Tibet region/Mongolia. After settlement they conquered Transilvania and nowadays they fabricate they were first to live on this land. Bear in mind that Romanians will never stop claiming their internationally admitted origin, dating from Daco-Romans times and they will never stop viewing Trasilvania as their own home! If the Hungarians want to live without conflicts, they should stop claiming what does not belong to them, the Transylvania land. PEACE!
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e6d073942d646a1 | You yourself revert without discussion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e71de02bf4a621b | But Hey, I'm sure we can both agree that both of them are much better than Saku Koivu. I hope no Canadians fans read this or we'll have a three-way Scandanavian Captain Slamfest! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e71ee5c14780167 | "
The part of 2 & 3 I don't follow is that in the wikipedia article it specifically states that the MWI explains the fine-tuned universe which refers to physical constants changing. Which is ofcourse a blatantly inaccurate foolish statement. The MWI does not explain the fine-tuned universe as listed. The statement made says that the MWI ""may provide an explanation for the fine-tuned universe"" which is obviously false and inaccurate. Do you know what a fine-tuned universe means or refers to? It's no wonder wikiepdia's accuracy is known as laughable with the most unnaturally foolish wiki editors141.156.133.161 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e7b412b9ca4a2fd | "
consultant and lecturer in the area of his expertise, cults (bolded words add nothing)
This seems pretty much ok, this is what he is... correct ?
he is commonly referred to as is imprecise, especially given the quotation marks (and avoids ""exit counseling""/kidnapping controversies)
This is better version of he claims to be
he maintains an informative database etc inserts unnecessary opinions (see WP:Weasel)
Respectfully i disagree... this is what it is, we can exclude the term informative and just database, this is one of his works.
he also owns cultnews.com and changing ""blog"" to ""web site"" obscures that these are self-published and not WP:RS
This page is about a person who control that site, this link is a must in this page, cannot be avoided.
the fact that he is an expert witness in some courts is inarguable but the added phrase in relation to his expert knowledge etc adds nothing
Agree, this line can be removed.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e84ad5af3ca4586 | get p!$$ed off when someone expresses hate for Nintendo. I | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e85c5167518436d | "
I created a new sockpuppet investigation - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo. Hopefully they can do more to block his IP. YO 😜 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e87fc12a2dc2df5 | Please, avoid personal attacks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e89bc9684ac48b7 | Questions for a story on Popular Mechanics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e8bb77c2d61c7f6 | Now that her birthday is finally here, it's easy enough to get her real former name from nashville city hall. Birth Records and Name change records are a matter of public information. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e8cb3860265b797 | "
Thank you for the Barnstar
Dear Daniel, thank you for awarding me a barnstar for contributing to saving 2006 FIFA World Cup controversies from deletion. It's my first barnstar in my year and 6 days as a Wikipedia user, so naturally I'm quite thrilled to be its recipient. Thanks again. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e8f26ac8e92fbcb | "
Azerbaijan-Bulgaria relations
Answer to your offer here.
Probably because of this redirect, bots add ""Azerbaijan-Bulgaria relations"" in Azwiki correspondent to the ""Foreign relations of Azerbaijan"" in English Wiki. Deleting interwiki does not make sense, sooner or later bots will add it again. If there exist no article about ""Azerbaijan-Bulgaria relations"" in English Wiki it is not necessary to redirect title to general article about Foreign affairs of Azerbaijan. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6e946b8a53cd6f57 | why won't you let users edit your Psych today pages and why won't you respond to questions about your lack of license, training, or experiences in the topics you offer advice about? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ea1030b53c66dec | RIR, it seems obvious you don't like the presence of Usana corp reps by your attempts to discredit them immediately upon arrival by asking Jean314 for proof of vandalism/sock puppetry, but none of the 4 behaviors in the inappropriate notification policy apply to this request for insiders:
Spamming: Posting an excessive number of messages to individual users, or to users with no significant connection to the topic at hand.
Campaigning: Posting a notification of discussion that presents the topic in a non-neutral manner.
Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement). Vote-banking involves recruiting editors perceived as having a common viewpoint for a group, similar to a political party, in the expectation that notifying the group of any discussion related to that viewpoint will result in a numerical advantage, much as a form of prearranged vote stacking.
Stealth canvassing: Contacting users off-wiki (by e-mail, for example) to persuade them to join in discussions (unless there is a specific reason not to use talk pages)
Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed.
Neither of the 2 corp accounts have any say in controversial discussions, and I would prefer they don't even comment on those. My original request was to have them point out inaccuracies in the article of which they have sourced proof is wrong. Items we have no idea they are incorrect unless someone pointed them out. I gave appropriate notification in my RfC (of which noone was yet responded) about the controversial issues we are discussing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ea476e186c8f050 | "Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. (?!? - cool stuff) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ea8d6a6595983b0 | "Ice skating is a classic ""eccentric"" dance act from vaudeville; it's description seems to indicate glides, and floating etc. Most regional African American heel toe funk dances can be traced back to accounts of dancing from 1850s and back to Africa. Read this book for more details: Jazz dance By Marshall Winslow Stearns
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6eb939b3f11064c7 | Soszynski/Bonnar
The names need to be flipped to Soszynski vs. Bonnar because on ufc.com bonnar is underdog which means names need to be flipped and.. the names need to be flipped. Take care now... bye bye then. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6eb946540a06a5d1 | Can I know an email address to send the material to Wikipedia.org on permits for processing images of those responsible for ML and possibly to explain officially what is it the ML?. I have warned the ML administrators so they could send both ML permissions to the images that the necessary explanations on the ML. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ebb5b1f73ae152f | Indeed. If the image should be planets only, then pluto should not be present. If dwarf planets are considered significant, then ceres, sedna, and all the other known ones should be included. As is, the image is self-contradictory. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ebcbef25394d8a5 | A tag has been placed on The Rosie Fan Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | Talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ec08c5d99bbbc21 | Archived discussion (worth a look!): [[List_of_Jews | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ec37b49448f4a92 | Thanks Tom.. I can see I might have to make a submission to the board of trustees. UkraineToday(|E) Trying to be constructive here and as I have suggested above I of there is any misunderstanding then I offer my apologies and seek like wise from others. But in all sincerity I believe this is a political gang-bang.
cur) (last) 00:02, August 23, 2007 Akhristov (Talk | contribs) (4,672 bytes) (sock) (undo)
(cur) (last) 22:05, April 21, 2007 DDima (Talk | contribs) (22 bytes) (, for information see: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luna_Santin&diff;=prev&oldid;=116459892)
Please note I have only one account that I use on Wikipedia and this is it. Fact is they do not want certain information and facts published. Yours in good faith UkraineToday(|E) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ec8eab19dee1c09 | Yeah, I know.
I noticed my own mistakes, thank you. That's why I tagged the redirect. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ec9920c289b4fa3 | TOM TERRY
just out of curiousity... whats a sock poppet? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ed54e510e12a050 | "
Your question on IRC
Hi - sorry I wasn't there to reply to the question you asked me on IRC yesterday. The answer was no, not yet. inp23 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ed7734c02d969a5 | Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Ron Dellums. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other destructive content into articles may lead to a block. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ed989726c1d0f01 | What I see in many articles is that people put down this extravagent history of a school and claims of it being elite. There are over 3000 colleges in the United States and everyone puts down these amazing histories that really isn't amazing just marketing. 24.239.153.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ee0c9c523e905a7 | "
What? Is this some kind of sick joke? Had you investigated this case at all, you would see my talk page access was revoked. As a WMF employee, you should be very well aware that with no talk page access, avenues of appeal to a 24 hour block are reduced to nil. As the WMF fails to provide sufficient avenues to pursue appeals against malicious or capricious administrative actions, I was forced to use the emergency email. It would be appreciated if you could alert me to a system of appealing talk page revocation within 24 hours, keeping in mind the UTRS system takes far longer than that. ★★''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ee2db4292570f5b | If further evidence of Auslondonder's ineptitude is needed, see this. I'm not well enough to keep much of an eye on things at the moment but some people certainly should because F&W; completely misread what was going on above and elsewhere. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ee4cf678143ea6b | Or the fact that I was not even linked to the discussion regarding this block or report in order to discuss with it, making the original block invalid for ANY reason other blatant SPAMming/etc., because I was not even notified of the discussion to even write on it. Etc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6eede55571a9b431 | Stupid
you are not a macedonian, you have betrayed your country's people you should have removed everything to do with bulgaria you have brought shame iPod yourself and you country. You are no Macedonian. you are a lazy piece of shit gypsy loving greek asshole | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6ef340d883711eb6 | "
That's exactly why the gamer is a dying breed... 15 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.