id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
69dd185abe596f85 | Correct. The term was hugely used in the rave scene. hundreds of thousands if not millions of Mix Tapes were broadcasting DJs around the world. The term is Mix Tape. The spelling Mixtape seems to be a hip hop thing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
69e25f08c67a9e4c | Please explain your citing to a dead talk page, its very hypocritical for a high class Wikipedian such as yourself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
69ef69a5d41d9693 | "
Intermarriages
Hi Tadija, I have nothing against entering that Vojsava Tripalda was thought as a Serbian princess. For that matter you might want to work on and tag Serbia TF also Angjelina Arianit Komneni, who was an Albanian that became a Saint for the Serbian Church. For that matter there have been dozens of intermarriages between Albanian and Serbian princes and princesses in the 14th through the 15th century. These are good figures that should be highlighted in my opinion because are bridges between the two people. I remember I mentioned to you some of them, so no edit warring, but enter what you have to enter in the article boldly, just reference properly and word it neutrally. Let's talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
69f6195c828cb6dc | ABC News said Woodruff has shrapnel wounds to the head, and Vogt was hit in the head and shoulder. They are reporting that Woodruff and Vogt are out of surgery, and are in stable condition recovering at a U.S. military hospital. — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a011f0c9c5315b0 | "== Sources ==
Contribution to 1997 NTSE conference
Committee membership in the Society for Marine Mammalogy
Participation in ""Interpreting Evolution"" conference, Haverford College, June 17, 2001
Staff at NCSE
Dissertation (2003)
Co-editor of Optimality in Biological and Artificial Neural Networks
Co-author of chapter in Why Intelligent Design Fails from Rutgers University Press
First Amendment Law Review, 2006
Chabot College lecture, 2005
Book review of Pennock's Tower of Babel
Greer-Heard Forum, 2006
OU OSLEP seminar, 2005
Year of Physics 2005 lecture at OU
UT Austin seminar, 2006
Stanford RATT group meeting
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a04a4238856fe5d | Makes sense: I wasn't quite sure where to put it, but the article used to come down pretty strongly on it as a form of minor creationism (which I guess it *technically* is, so... =) talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a069748c48d0f28 | You mean you support the Ku Klux Klan? Thenatureboy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a127de7d945e37b | I think you are quite right, but I don't do that much with WP:NFC, aside from its relation to text, so I'm going to see if I can get an somebody who does to help you out. ) (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a1922eaed14946e | "
Non-Authority Professor Samuel Eliot Morison
To some writers this marriage appears to be a great mystery. How could a foreign chartmaker [NOTE: suddenly he is a chartmaker and not the same ""LANERIO DE JANUA"" wool weaver of Genoa presented in the Raccolta document XXXXI from 1472, Morison, going against the documents promoted the wool-weaver to a chartmaker? ] of low birth who had been literally “on the beach” a few years before, marry into one of the noble families of the kingdom? Already about 25 years old when she caught young Christopher’s roving eye, her mother was glad enough to have no more convent bills to pay, and as son-in-law to secure an up-and-coming young man of gentlemanly manners, who asked for no dowry. ( Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea (Little, Brown, Boston, 1942).)
THIS previous extract IS A FANTASY INVENTED By MORISON AND A BIG LIE- This is a fabrication by Morison written completely without any proof. Morison did not find anything related to FIlipa's dowry AND the truth is that Filipa’s mother was NOT paying any “convent bills” because Filipa was so privilegded that she lived at the Monastery of Santos belonging to the elite Military Order of Santiago where she had ALL EXPENSES PAID, as a ""Comendadora"" just like her cousin ANA de MENDONÇA (King John II's Mistress) and her aunt VIOLANTE NOGUEIRA (nanny of King John II's aunts) and even participated in the management of the All-Saints ""Comendary"". Morison even invented that his “Colombo peasant” was an up-and-coming star, a prodigy as if the mother-in-law, Isabel Moniz, already knew in 1478, only 2 years after supposedly washing ashore penniless (and not able to speak Portuguese or even Italian) that the wool-weaver was going to be a famous STAR in 1493. FURTHERMORE: Filipa's marriage in 1479 HAD to be AUTHORIZED by King John II who was MASTER of the Comendadoras of Santiago. Contrary to what Morison and his supporters of the wool-weaver tale wrote of this fantasy marriage, it was impossible for Filipa Moniz to have married a non-noble two-bit weaver the likes of that Genoese Colombo who had supposedly washed ashore only two years prior from parts unknown with no money, no education, no ship nor even a job in that closed high-class society of Portugal—a noble society so restricted that the Captain of Madeira actually arrested his brother's noble widow for marrying a Nobleman below her station.(1) There is NO DOUBT that Filipa’s husband had to be her equal in social stature and not any wool-weaver. The whole tale invented by Morison of a peasant marrying a Noble Portuguese Captain’s daughter is a perfect example of how inaccurate have been the history books on the history of Admiral Cristóbal Colón.
The motivations that bring an author to take such wild liberties with the truth are not intended to be dealt with in this book, however it is something that should alarm all readers because the established pattern had always been one of accepting the ""myth of the Genoese weaver"" and then twisting the known facts to fit into that tale while at the same time discarding important facts that deny a peasant birth for the discoverer..... Don Fernando Colón who wrote that his father was of noble lineage and not a peasant laborer form anywhere as others were: ""Falsely calling him a craftsman ... [as such the Admiral] would not have learned so many letters or sciences ... especially the four main sciences ... Astrology, Cosmography, Geometry and Navigation ... The admiral was a man of letters and of great experience, and did not spend time on things manual or on mechanical arts.(2) Today's investigations and scientific research confirms that Don Fernando Colón was right and that his father could never have been the wool-weaver Colombo, or Pigeon but was instead a Kõlon, or Member of some special noble family.""
(1) -«D. Maria de Noronha... foi castigada de forma violenta e cruel pelo cunhado Martim Gonçalves da Câmara,.... a encarcerou numa prisão da Torre de Belém, como a expôs à vergonha de atravessar as ruas de Lisboa entre esbirros, sobre uma mula, com as mãos manietadas». Doutor Gaspar Frutuoso, Saudades da Terra, Edição do Instituto Cultural de Ponta Delgada, 1984, página 284. / (2) Historie del S.D. Fernando Colombo nelle quali s'ha particolare, & vera relatione della vita, & de' fatti dell'Ammiraglio D. Christoforo Colombo, suo padre, et dello scoprimento, che'egli fece dell'Indie Occidentali, dette Mondo Nuovo, hora possedute dal Sereniss. Re catolico. nuouamente di lingua spagnuola tradotte nell'italiana dal S. Alfonso Ulloa. Published in 1571, Appresso Francesco de' Franceschi Sanese (In Venezia)) / (3) Manuel Rosa in Columbus. The Untold Story.
...It is amazing that after all the research that has been published in Portugal and Spain in the lat 5 year, including the Admiral's original coat of arms, that we still insist on propping up the old fairy tale of t | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a200a8f80c52a4e | "
Reply to ""How the Amerindians became Spanish or Hispanic""
Wow! You incorrectly on a great scale stated the following:
""...neither Hispanic nor Anglo are ""racial"" terms per se while African American is.""
Just to correct you, in america, hispanic and anglo are used as racial terms. Where do you come from that you don't recognize this? Again, just fo the record, europeans view non-white south americans as hispanic. Spaniards are not considered hispanic by european standards.
And don't let these stupid americans fool you either! At one point, they considered jews and irish to be non-white, believe it or not. So, this speaks volumes of the ignorance of americans who don't even come close to europeans in culture, arts, language, science, fashion, etc.
." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a2143e715f53174 | "
Extraterrestrial hypothesis
Howdy. You modified some changes I had made to the intro to ETH. I had posted some commentary on the reasons behind the changes on the talk page; it would have been nice if you had commented there, especially since I left it open for commentary for over a month before I put the change in place ;-). If you disliked the way it's written now, you should see what it said before I changed it. And just removing the citation (which I spent quite some time finding) is not very helpful. Anyway, other than my slightly bruised ego, your point about the citation not mentioning ETH is well taken. Regardless of terminology they distinctly were *not* talking about ETH but about UFOs. I will try to change it to reflect that. What the citation supports is the notion that when scientists review the evidence at hand, they conclude that some UFO reports merit further study, but they don't really comment much on ETH. E.g. the notion that there's even a minority support for ETH in mainstream science is wrong. And leaving the comment ""a few scientists ..."" is zero info, since you can pretty much find a ""a few"" scientists supporting any notion. I will post a version of this comment on the ETH talk page; please follow up there if after my next edit you still disagree with the text. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a2702c8ad879a60 | The references problem is happening because the main reflist is in the main page, rather than the transcluded sub page. It only gets updated instantly when the main page is edited. Otherwise, it goes onto the job queue and can take some hours to update. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a2d9ce0c79f0d44 | "
WikiProject Pakistan
Hello! your participation is requested here. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a326f3d8b2bf633 | Shill and Puppet
It is obvious from your biased and prejudiced edits of my wiki entries that you are a sold-out shill for the pharmaceutical industry. Unfortunately for me, you carry too much weight with Wikipedia management, and so your campaign of cover-up will prevail. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a33b2a8a66f5794 | Come and go, Gun Powder Ma
Hey, Gun Powder Ma, if you don't reply the questions that people put forwarded, as you seems to came in and left without discussing after inserted your materials, if that's so your edits will be removed. Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a37c8c004967be0 | Edip Yuksel
The Edip Yuksel article was given a speedy deletion, because it has already been deleted TWICE, and recreated against Wikipedia consensus. Recreated pages like that are fair game.
As for an article on Code 19 no way! Now there might be a need for an article on Islam and numerology, using some of the material collected for the United Submitters article. I had never heard of adjab and it might be a good idea to have more on the subject. There might also I'm free associating here be a need for an article on the folklore of Islam, superstititions of Islam, or something like that. Significant numbers, wearing Hand-of-Fatima amulets, blue beads ... stuff that you as a convert might have encountered at the mosque. I'm not saying that this is PART of Islam, just that these are things that some Muslims do. (Easter eggs are not part of Christianity, but they are something some Christians do ... you get the idea.) 29 June 2005 21:21 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a3a4ff6121c7f12 | German-Japanese relations
Hey there. I can see your point, however I disagree. The Tripartite Pact is an integral part of German-Japanese relations and its signing was a significantstep towards each other (and if only for publicity reasons). As such, it clearly deserves proper illustration, especially since this picture enhances the overall appearance of the article (historic articles often employ secondary/indirect illustration). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a3dbf09bd45cdf7 | "* Template talk:R help#""Like"" a /doc page
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a45348fba62e332 | "
I don't know why you are suggesting that I step back. I came to an article with no significant edits for a year, that said bizarre things about a living person without any citations, and I threw up a construction tag. I did a few hours of work adding sources and removing unsourced material and went to sleep. When I woke up the article suddenly had a large number of editors excliaming the merits or the unsourced original article. I never even started putting in the material I had gathered which caused me to originally put up the construction tag. Then my newly created Jesse Fleiss article got an AFD within minutes of having started it, also with a construction tag, with delete arguments essentially claiming that reality televisoin is so bad that its central ""artistic"" co-creators get a different standard than that in WP:CREATIVE, just because they are hacks whose work does not deserve to be notable when it is. Why should I step back from and article I just put a construcion tag on, or allow unsourced negative information in a BLP as I found it? I will do as you suggest, but please respond to that question. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a45aa67d18605c3 | That's how I started off - same result. Perhaps you have not set the MIME type of the file correctly. This affects our mobile phone downloads anyway. Or I could have this completely wrong. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a49bce87b48214e | "
Thanks for alphabetizing them. The sources you linked to above are not acceptable for Wikipedia purposes. Blogs and forum postings aren't sufficient. We've previously had a problem with editors adding unsourced names. I'm going to delete the undsourced names. Feel free to restore any for which we can find reliable sources. (I'll also delete the Sailer quotes, since it isn't clear he's a Paleo.) talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a4f0c37d0c3d887 | "
Polish Wikipedians' notice board
Zapraszam. 08:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Intertoto Cup
Thanks for cleaning up the table on the Intertoto Cup page - 18:48, 15/06/05
Computer3 bot
Hello, I'm a sysop of English Wikibooks. Is it possible to install your Computer3 bot at Wikibooks and #wikibooks IRC channel?
Done. Bot is active in #wikibooks-en-vandalism Talk
Where can I find instructions of using the bot? I see there are whitelisted users and watched pages, where and how are they set?
Just say ""computer help"" in channel
The bot at #wikibooks-en-vandalism seems not working - it does not show anything. F.e. bot at #wikipedia-en-vandalism displays a message when an user is blocked - this one not.
Ill investigate at once. Talk
OK after spending hours on this I located the problem. A typo was causing all the problem, should be resolved. Talk
RE: Commons images
Will do tomorrow, I need to go now. e (T | C)
Re:Your message
The reason i am not working on meta, is because to my knowledge, i am not a verified user there.
o. Talk to me
I have asked Pathoschild to add my name. o. Talk to me
Re:Half-Life Fact File on Wikibooks
Try the Half-Life Wikia. I'm sure they will gladly accept it. Thanks for notifying. I wouldn't had spotted this. ╫ ◀RingADing▶ ╫
copyright status of wikisource images
I am attempting to work out the status of some images (s:Special:Prefixindex/Image:Bookkeeping) you have transwiki'ed onto Wikisource, as I would like to move them to commons or remove them. I see that the images came from wikibooks , but I am unsure whether they are scanned or original, and thus whether to use {{PD-old-70}} or {{PD-user}}.
Legnica
Hello. Sorry, I didn't noticed that in the article. -
Response
Hi Kopacabana,
I responded to your post on my talk. chat.edits
KopacabanaBot
Hi there Kopacabana. I just wanted to ask you if you've already been cleared for making bot edits on the Simple English Wiktionary. We have a stricter policy than most, so I just wanted to make sure that you are doing the right thing. Cheers, flame " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a4fe603eaa401f3 | Get stuffed. 194.216.205.190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a51804013dff4f3 | "
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
Thanks for correcting my edit there; didn't mean to do that. I think I pressed the wrong button. - Oars " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a5422a3aef6b124 | Catchpole edits articles to suit his own warped way of thinking
I have to agree with many of the above comments about Catchpole. I noticed yesterday that he deleted my contributions to a topic simply because he didn't like the facts I was presenting. This user should be banned from Wikipedia as he is a nefarious character. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a5bfda0f48f0354 | Locations
There are 148 locations around the United States right now. http://www.thecheesecakefactory.com/Locations/locations# | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a691250d611178c | Please post new entries at the bottom of this page. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a6f2ad1cff6980f | Problems with the current gallery:
1)People from the British isles are over represented.
2)There is a pic of Sami. Sami's pop number are max 100,000.
3)There is a pic of Chechen. Chechen's pop number is max 2 mil.
4)Yet, despite pictures of these people, there are no: Poles (pop:40 mil), Dutch (16 mil), Scandinavian(20 mil). Noone from Balkans. Noone from outside Europe but of European ancestry. So the gallery is unrepresentitive.
5)Too many politicans.
6)These people are, for the most part, historically insignificant.
So the current gallery is simply of pretty low quality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a7024dc585e022d | All you lies are detailed to you. Unable to defend even one of them, what do you do - dsiplay your intolerance by getting rid of bold text ! have you no honour or integrity at all ??? GENERAL TOJO | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a72c4e59f559c1f | "removed)"" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.128.183
There is a link to the full name of the word in the external links section. Also see previous discussions about the name on this talk page as to why we don't include it on the main page. ''' 24/7''' (C) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a745c806bde3040 | Terryeo editing again?
Hey..... I saw your observation that the anon IP that recently edited Altered texts in Scientology doctrine was making the exact same point that Terryeo has been making on the talk page... I checked the IP, and sure enough, the anon IP is 65.147.84.76, which comes from the same block of Qwest servers as Terryeo's IP (which he publicly displayed recently as being 65.146.30.209). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a75d138a91e9105 | User page
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking site, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV/resumé or lengthy autobiography. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a8062dd8c8c5cb5 | Skywalk / new tourist attraction
Wired Germany reported about a new touristic attraction: a skywalk with mega slide at this mountain.
https://www.wired.de/collection/latest/tschechische-architekten-bauen-ein-riesiges-holzgestell-mit-rutsche | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a845f6ffe3139e8 | "
Don't tell me how to run my life asshole. -7 " | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6a88d25e14af65d7 | The Bloomfield College Sockpupeteer
I've been re-researching this case over the last few days, but am going to wait to insert the information and links, in the hopes that in the meantime, the Bloomfield College sockpuppeteer will be blocked. At present, he is up to four IPs:
User: 130.156.30.57
User: 130.156.29.61
User: 130.156.29.134
User: 130.156.31.143 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a88d3236b7b419c | The title isn't. Way to fire off a snide, absolutely useless reply though. The next step is to enlist the aid of an admin. Repeatedly insisting that you're right because you're right means nothing, and isn't the least bit relevant. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a8e23ed24488398 | In response to your recent comment on my talk page.
Bugger off. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a92f79f51dfde00 | "
Very interesting story! T·C " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a96c9f431caea2d | Y Combinator
Why did you erase my edit on Y Combinator? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6a9c9a1197afbf83 | U
I'm sorry, but, in spite of your (Xanthy's) recent edits to that very sentence, I'm still confused. As I outlined above, it is not clear to me how finding that pigments were typical of those used in the 16th century supports the claim that Goller forged paintings. Here is the sentence as it is now:
He adds that the palette is limited to a few dull colours and that an analysis of the chemical composition of the pigments in these paintings, such as white lead, shows that the pigments used in the paintings are typical of those that would have been used in the 16th century.
16:09, 11 December 2014 ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6aa9aa8cc1b38d2e | "
You win
Congratulations, angry emo fans. ""Oh my NX Zero is not an imitator!"". Cry it to your mother right now!
NX ZERO ORIGINALITY! " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ab05aafab2e1852 | "Revert wars
""Skip, if you are having problems with User:Technocrate, please seek out an administrator before getting into a revert war with him. To an admin, your reverts look just as bad as his. 77siddhartha ""
Please do not post things like this on my page again. I suggest that that person be engaged, but that person has never been engaged. That person is only a soldier here for NET.( )" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ab188b6c61a4e8a | "
Not familiar with that song. Sigh. If you are a non-smoker, stay one. I quit about a year ago, and ever since I found out that Pedro had the nasty habit, I have found myself longing for one. I'm told the cravings never go away (I smoked about 10 years). Sigh. ... | 76 | " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ab2c9208a5d4b42 | Dallas
How is that vandalism, rain man? 94.14.244.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ab92d9121057d9d | apology. You are an anglican priest (guffaws) who must protect fellow Christian and Bouha sockpuppet Drmaik. Why british christians keep messing with Muslim Arab articles, to the detriment of content, is beyond me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6abd88039678f2c3 | I do not deny anything. I will wait with any further action until the protecting admin returns to undo the picking of his preferred version. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6abe39a0639db241 | List of U.S. cities with large Filipino American populations
I have merged all the verified content to Demographics of Filipino Americans, see change here. The only content supported by a RS that was not added was from this editorial article, as it talked about old immigration rates. The specific sentence is:
New content regarding the 2010 population of Filipino Americans in Hawaii is already included in the target article, and in an article that is specifically about Filipinos in Hawaii.
I have left a redirect in its place, in case there are other articles which contain a wikilink to the article that was subject to the AfD. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6abe99f7036350a3 | There is also the option of a conversion to STOBAR rather than CATOBAR the F35C could work then. Does anyone anything about the planned Arrester system, is it likely to traditional hydro-pneumatic or linear motors like EMALS? See /Linear_eddy_current_brake#Linear_eddy_current_brake. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ac3c7630a8602fb | Slav-Macedonians? S | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ac876ffb6012279 | | accept = As below; won't link to site. :==( o ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ad20f98fdd5efbd | IM SICK OF THHIS GUY
I WILL BE SILENCED NO MORE THIS NOT VANDALISM SO HE CANNOT ERASE IT FOR NO REASON I AM JUST SIMPLY VOICING MY OPINION SO HA DOES NE1 ELSE AGREE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ae1503dc9995493 | 3RR violation
You have violated the Wikipedia:Three revert rule by reverting Iraq Liberation Act 5 times. If you continue to revert this page, you will be blocked for up to 24 hours. Please be careful about this! Thanks. -|✍ 19:43, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ae2e39dd8853e68 | On radio
Why is this programme introduced as being a television show, when it was originally on BBC Radio 4? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6ae4e7f652210434 | "
Responding to your request. I am thinking that one way that MUCH improved article could be improved even more, would be if you would consider providing more sources throughout. For example, ""During the 1990s, Albano became a vegetarian and shed 150 lbs. following a health scare. He later suffered a heart attack, but quickly recovered in 2006"" are two sentences that could use some form of reference for verification. You might want to look at this article as an example of how to do the referencing: Great work thusfar!!! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6aebc07b89879786 | "
I have now filed a case at Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard#Community ban on User:SEGA. I would appreciate any input. Cheers! Let's talk | [[Special:Contributions/Moeron|done]]
Done, thanks for the note. Cheers, '
Supercategories
Hi Daniel
I just noticed on the Mariners article seems to have a couple of super-categories, Sport in NSW is a supercat of Football (soccer) in NSW, and Australian football (soccer) teams is a supercat of A-League teams. It's a minor point but are the supercats necessary if you've already identified more specific cats?
Ah, yes, you raise a very good point. I must say, categories have never been my strong point; the best example was Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/FIFA World Cup hat-tricks, when I submitted it to FLC without even adding them (I forgot about their existance totally). I have modified the article, as (from my limited category knowledge) you are quite correct. Cheers, and thanks so much for this note, all your other suggestions, and your minor fixes, '''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6aedd9c06b91aac4 | Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dil | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6af98e2760d9d7a7 | Politics is about power. The G-G has a LOT of power according to the Constitution, which makes the office potentially very political, although the standard practice is for the G-G not to act in a PARTISAN manner. That doesn't mean the office is apolitical, as 1975 showed very clearly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6afa31a66517c192 | I'm after a general look, but if you want to do a full FAC-esque review, that would be spiffing! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6afb489791180366 | hello
Can you please look the page of Ambedkar? A user removed the Table (List of Books) from the page. Theredpenofdoom is a user who is constantly reverting the changes made by other users. Metta 123.239.118.255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6afd855be48b2d1e | THAT IS BULL SHIT.
JEWS HAVE HIJACKED THIS SITE.
JEWS ARE PREVENTING OBAMA FROM BEING PRESIDENT
JEWS DID 9/11
JEWS ALL HAVE HUGE NOSES | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b088f885d16ba7a | "
Removal of Specious content
I have read completely the source cited to say that Che was in the ""custoy"" of Félix. The citated material does not substantiate this and has been removed per WP:BLP and other policies. Please do not reinsert this. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b09fb49bb66b9ac | RE: Rollback
hi again mitchell, as per our discussion: i've installed Friendly and Twinkle on my account and went back through my list of reverts giving out both welcome (where appropriate) and caution or warning messages on the talk pages of the last 20 or so users i reverted; i'll be sure to continue the practice in the future. i also gave thanks to another user, , who had already given warnings/welcomes to some of the users i had reverted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b0a6ab0c98db2b9 | That is not a relevant argument. Wikilinks are made up in that manner because the Firefox page has been linking to the browser. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b0bc19c2a30a995 | guns?
I'm confused. I thought you kangaroos weren't allowed to have guns and your crazy government wasted a bunch of money buying them all back from you? 142.179.122.199 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b0d36d0015c6d51 | "
administrator problems
This was an edit ""antonio"" made a week or two ago. Not five years ago. Also, Benji's DISCUSSION page should be a DISCUSSION page, like I assumed it was, since that's what everbody else's is. If you don't want to help, please butt out. 98.232.181.201 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b13539feedac7c4 | Discussion notice
You participated in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)#RFC-birth date format conformity when used to disambiguate so I thought you might want to comment at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)#Birth date format conformity .28second round.29. (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b1a198a924ce817 | Yes its all a group of F.U.B.A.R American Christian administrators.
I wonder why there are no admins from other countries - there is no rhetoric - its a fact .Bloody circumcised assholes. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6b1cb8c23f4778d7 | The reason I removed GNU Linux is because i was trying to Put more emphasis on Windows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b28fc7925978d3e | The question isn't about due weight between sources, though. It's about due weight with regards to information. To take a step back, clearly this was basically a brutal murder and, within the context of British society, you would have to be a lunatic not to condemn it unequivocally. It's always possible to dig up a lunatic if you want to interview one, but it doesn't change the basic consensus about whether the attack was a good or a bad thing. It's the consensus that the lead of the article ought to reflect. The views of people like Anjem Choudary, the Westboro Baptist Church or David Icke don't really have a place in the lead sections of articles about significant contemporary events. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b2ea912b9f17c19 | Fine, but would it get us in trouble with Marvel? I mean, its not like we're making off a profit off of it or anything. Its a free site, and if anything more like free advertising. 01:26, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b307040ba248959 | Please
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:Alex_Smotrov
Thanks78.85.139.170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b3420bc91b215dc | """Talk page"" refers to conversation about the article itself and how to improve it, not debate about the subject of the article. If you feel the article as it stands misrepresents THC, gather your sources and make edits. 184.182.183.82
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b409eb00480710c | I'm not worried about whether you've read it, I'm worried about the fact that repeated threats to out don't bother you, and you're an admin. 24.177.120.138 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b41128f6c5d39d3 | Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Azam Qureshi. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. + R/W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b41da42da5a8c52 | "
Márquez quotation
In The Fragrance of Guava, a collection of conversations between Gabriel García Márquez and Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza, first published in 1982, Márquez describes Neruda as ""the greatest poet of the 20th century — in any language."" That is the original source of that statement, which has been quoted, unsourced, by the Washington Post, by All Things Considered on NPR, and most recently, in the New Directions paperback edition of Love Poems. But how exactly to cite that original source in a Wikipedia article, I will leave to established editors." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b445927bc82d806 | Hi!
I am looking for William Edward O'Brien that married Eliza Ann Cross. Aroud the 18th centery
In Sctland or England. Eliza Ann Cross was first cousen to Quenn Elizibeth the 1st.I am looking for William's Parients and Eliza's Parients.
Thank You
Lonna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b4a4b21fd295733 | Wow
I'm impressed with your research skills ;p
It was the first time I used the reference desk and I was only messing around really but I think im going to ask a lot more questions for school on there i think. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b4a56cc2a3e56d8 | RfC notice
I thought I should of course do it in your favour and have the RfC gain momentum without notifieng you, but we Russians are civilised people, and lowering myself to your level. Anyway your neglect to existance and your abuse of admin powers have prompted us, the whole Russian and Ukrainian communities to start a full RfC against you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b4a8d5f0415cd4d | FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING FAGGOT!!!! this is Sean MC Sean. You motherfuckers blocked me for a long time | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
6b4ae49a6fa62346 | "
Turtle Ship
The claim that iron cladding on the turtle ship is controversial is a personal opinion that is not referenced. Under WK:A such personal opinions are inappropriate and the text of the article should accurately reflect what the referenced source actually states. The main article that is the source for all the Korean and Japanese quotations on turtle ship's iron cladding comes from Prof. Park/Pak/Bak's article in some SNU journal. If you read the article, you'll see that the article doesn't mention anything about a supposed ""controversy"" but rather assumes iron cladding on the turtle ship. Please check the references yourself if you're interested. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b4eda57857f331b | Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ opened
An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 12, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b52594fec32a9ef | And IrishGuy - Your actions should be reviewed because we were involved in the dispute. You as an admin had no right to use your administrative powers to ban me. That's the issue I have. Why I'm coming back to discuss this with you guys is beyond me. I'm really out of here unless someone has something that involves my input. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b55ee770790b2e6 | "
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 69.121.8.104). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.
When you edit pages:
Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.
Your edit to WCW Mayhem
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b585f0022a5b97e | Thanks, I bet that it won't stay. Too many predators around, but never give up. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b5a21046088c1f0 | OK. It may be a UK/US thing. I'll look at a copy of the book at some point. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b5e93744ee54549 | I notice that his sock puppet was called | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b61fad0eeda529f | Thanks. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b620a352572fce7 | Apologies but....
I apologise for any inconvenience/harassment on my behalf, and i assure you this will not happen again.
However, the Wiki:ANI case was really not your place to intervene, was it not?
regards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b63281f2578d492 | Apparently Richard Coates had lectured on the subject, so whomever wrote that must have attended the lecture. Unfortunately, they seem not to have taken very good notes...A cursory search online offers no better clues, unfortunately. 68.165.20.181 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b656fb48448e217 | "
Your inconsistent view points on references for cults and hate groups
In talk:cult you say that the checklists must go because they are unscientific, though they are clearly mentioned as disputed and attributed to the anti-cult movement. The one by Lifton is referenced. I support replacement of the other checklist by the one by Eileen Barker. 12:45, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
In talk:hate group you support a checklist presented as proven fact that is unattributed, but just made up and you oppose my view that the checklist must be referenced. 12:45, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I may miss something but it seems that you use double standards to support your views. I hope that your can re-consider your opinions about references for checklists on these subjects. Thanks in advance. 12:39, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Good point, Andries. I do not have a problem with these checklists if they are placed in the destructive cults article. 19:07, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Zappaz, thanks for you changing your opinion. The problem is, I think, that it is difficult to distinguish between a harmless NRM, a cult and a destructive cult. That is why I think the checklists are important and should stay in the cult article, or at least directly linked to. I mean, my former group has some destructive/exploiting traits, which I only found out after nine years. Besides many scholars, the media and the public do not make the distinction between a cult and a destructive cult. 19:19, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
That is exactly the reason: the media and the public do not make that distinction. My hope is that the Wikipedia articles can throw some neutral light into that confusion. That is my hope. With your help and the help of other editors editing those articles, we have a good chance to suceed in doing that. And that would be a wonderful thing. 01:10, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Regarding your complaints about Andries' behavior
May be it is because of my English but I think I was the co-author of the Criticism of Prem Rawat article. So were you. So was Jossi. I admit that Gary D was the main author. May be I am confused because of the subtle language differences between Dutch and Engish. Same for e.g. the word ""study"" that has a slightly different meaning when compared to the Dutch word ""studie"", which was, in hindsight, the reason for one of my many disputes with Jossi. 23:06, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I only said on talk:past teachings of Prem Rawat that I do not understand you. In fact, I defended you against Jim's accusations. 23:06, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I checked what I wrote on forum8 about you the last 60 days and I could only find the following post by me in which I defended you. http://www.forum8.org/forum8/posts/7621.html 23:06, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I really do not understand why you think that my behavior towards you is inappropriate. 23:06, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Zappaz, I think we have to concentrate on articles to prevent endless and senseless discussions. I do not think that we will ever agree about your complaints about my behavior. 01:26, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I clearly see that you do not want to take responsibility for your actions. Fair enough. 05:35, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Zappaz, I do take responsibility for my words. I write here under my real name and I even clarified my words outside Wikipedia upon your request here in Wikipedia. This is far more than the guidelines in Wikipedia or its spirit demand. 18:30, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Besides, I did not make a cloaked accusation towards you. I had no other intention than to defend both Jim and you. What can I do to convince you of that? In that post I explicitly wrote that I believed you to be sincere. It is not my fault that you go far beyond the literal meaning of what I wrote there and suspect that I made a cunning attack on your credibility. It took me even a while before I understood to what extent you had misinterpreted what I wrote. 18:30, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks
Zappaz, I appreciate the information from Marc Galanter in the DLM article. 18:13, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
~
Your views on apostasy
I generally consider apostates' testimony to be reliable. For years I thought that the detractors of SSB had been dirty liars who had been bribed to g | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b6813426106f2b5 | The specifics may not be agreed upon; the broad strokes are. There may be a disagreement on the scale of a few kilometers, but the general gist of the borders is widely accepted. There are only a few macro border disputes in the world, like between Egypt and Sudan, and none are in the Caucuses. (except, of course, for the disputed borders of the breakway republics of Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia) Unless you know something that I don't about the AZ-GE border being more disputed than I'm portraying. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b6883ee8e6d3877 | "
I did accidentally miss some text from my post and have now corrected it. I did not intend to say you were a BNP supporter. I noticed that you had edited the British National Party article recently and that was what I said, and which I stand by. I did not even look at your edit and even if I had I could not conclude or intend to say that you are a supporter of the BNP. If it was possible to read it that way, then I apologise. I have edited the remarks to make it make sense (I see now that it was incomplete).
It is true that you and Steven Slater have edited the article about the BNP which is a tiny and insignificant extremist party in the UK. I did find it strange that two people who edit that article should descend and comment on the NPOV issue raised by Jesanj; especially when Jesanj has also mentioned in the past a claim that I did not understand at all until I googled the matter and it led me to a LaRouche organization website. I have no idea if he did get that comment from Larouche or invented it himself independently but this has aroused suspicion because the LaRouche organization seems to me to be an extreme political organization not at all unlike the BNP. There is also another connection I have found between Jesanj's edits and the LaRouche organization which for the time being I will not reveal publicly. Furthermore, an editor who was found to be a sock of a known LaRouche editor and who was apparently editing from a Larouche IP address was actively involved in supporting Jesanj in another edit dispute I have had with Jesanj. That user has now been blocked from editing WP. Here we have an editor (Jesanj) trying to justify that Palin was talking about NICE when there is no evidence for that. And now at NPONV we have a group of editors with editing connections to matters of extreme right wing / Nazi like organizations all seem to wish to see preserved in WP the same thing. An association, no matter how remote and unlikely between NICE and Death Panels. Jesanj also wants to connect NICE and the IPAB! Both are non mainstream (or extremist) views, which is why I keep removing his multiple attempts to add POV bias to WP. The combination of factors i describe is, I believe, a prima facia case for believing that there may not be any independence in the views being expressed by SOME of the editors who have commented on the NPOV issue. The simple fact is that Palin did not refer to NICE as a death panel and as far as we know, she did not even wish to imply that. She has had plenty of opportunity to clarify her comments and not once has she mentioned NICE. The position of the UK journalists is absurd because it has no foundation and as far as anyone can tell, so only an extremist would wish to support that view. To repeat it twice in different places when there is already a reference to NICE as a potential ""death panel"" candidate in the article is taking liberties, and up with this we should not put. Which is why I deleted two of the references and left the third in. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b6b04e577a35fd5 | Stop
Stop screwing Chopin's birthday you uneducated ignorant. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b6da8bd8a6e678f | AfD nomination of Mohammed bin Osama bin Laden
Thanks for your message. I explained my views on the subject on the deletion page. All the best, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b7338e8cfb92959 | "
Warning about your behavior
Cush, you had a conniption when I used an off-color term to describe you on my own talk page. I was blocked for it for 24 hours. But as the following diffs show, you are regularly abusive, foul-mouthed, and bigoted, and your refusal to WP:AGF and denigration of other editors has been going on for too long. I'm asking you to stop. Accept the fact that your opinion about religion is your opinion, and doesn't have any special standing on Wikipedia.
These diffs are a partial list. I got tired of going back through your history. But it's easy enough to extend the list. Change your behavior and your attitude, please.
20:25, 19 August 2009 ""Lisa only suggests this name change to keep out material she does not like due to her religionist disposition""
07:08, 20 August 2009 ""Lisa is widely known to manipulate articles to render a religion-friendly POV. She has been warned about that so many times it ain't even funny anymore."" (this was a fabrication)
15:40, 20 August 2009 ""when it comes to historicity religiously motivated publishers are in a COI""
20:37, 20 August 2009 ""Reliable sources for the historicity of anything are scientific sources. That excludes all publications by religious institutions or religiously motivated individuals""
18:10, 9 September 2009 ""anyone who has really read the bible and has an IQ above 5 will instantly recognize that it is a big fat lie"", ""religionists like you who may have ""reliable sources"" on their side but just no common sense or logic""
05:09, 10 September 2009 ""you fail to admit your COI when it comes to biblical history""
18:34, 18 September 2009 ""Religious people are in a COI when it comes to historical accuracy""
14:18, 27 September 2009 ""nutjob who ever wrote about this""
12:42, 4 October 2009 ""there is no such thing as a 'Jewish people'""
16:37, 4 October 2009 ""religionist POV""
20:31, 9 October 2009 Personal attack
09:34, 19 October 2009 ""Welcome to Wikipedia and its many endorsements of Jewish POVs""
17:09, 26 October 2009 ""Divine intolerance towards dissent""
14:44, 30 October 2009 ""digging up very old shit""
21:25, 2 November 2009 ""Read the fucking Bible""
13:42, 3 November 2009 ""Lisa is always Lisa"", ""Your Lisa-fundamentalism shows. As usual""
- " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b769517ca08d6dc | "== Entirely too much exposition for a game nobody plays ==
This entry's game-plot/storyline is longer than the combined entries for the plot/storylines of all three movies. A few hundred fans of the game may care about its story, but this sort of overly detailed plot exposition doesn't belong in a Wikipedia article. Smells like fans trying to save a dying game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
I agree, though before seeing this section I was going to suggest splitting it off into a separate article to satisfy those who disagree. I think we need a little more discussion and consensus before coming to a decision, however. t
Honestly I don't there is any need to ""satisfy"" anyone who is not content with it. The cruft is barely (if at all) notable enough to be in this article. Never mind its own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
I don't think obvious personal bias against this (or any game for that matter) should be a motivator for any article changes. —Preceding comment was added at
The obvious personal bias of a few overzealous gamers is the reason the article's so bloated with trivial data to begin with. I'm with Ookami, this game just plain isn't notable enough to warrant a chapter by chapter breakdown of its storyline. That's what fan sites are for.
Just checked the World of Warcraft page out of curiosity, and even it doesn't have this much detailed story description. In fact it barely has any, and I don't think anyone can argue which of the two games is more notable. Also someone further up the page here brought this issue up already under 'generic story', why is this still being allowed?
I play this game, I could care less that the huge exposition was taken out. That was an absolutely ridiculous story summary; most of the people that play the game couldn't tell you half of it. However, to kill the previous, argument, WoW barely has a story, while the Matrix Online's main content and selling point is the story. We don't need a 20 paragraph summary like before. A mention that there have been past live events, as well as a 4 sentence or so story summary, should suffice. I'd challenge one of you to do it, as I don't think any of you know anything about the game in the current state, besides that it is much weaker than World of Warcraft.
To clarify my point above, I think the storyline section is very good now, it does, however, need the slightest mention of what has happened.
Just for clarification, the game's main selling point was not the story itself, but that the players would be shaping the story, which never happened. And WoW has plenty of story, enough to fill reams of Wikipages, it's just that it doesn't belong here in that great of detail. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a novel.
Well, since there seems to be some rough consensus that this is well overdone, and that there has been no real objection to it, and pending the fact that no one with the adequate experience within the game has stepped forward to trim it down and keep whatever are the key points, I'm going to purge it.Talk|@
Per the anon-IP user's objection in the page history of the main article... It doesn't matter. Its that simple. The story is WP:CRUFT, is a broken part of an already barely notable game , and the fact that something cannot be fixed, or that no one is willing to, does not mean you have to keep it in its current state. Sometimes broken things have to be thro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b78084103071eb1 | I don't see you warning who has been editwarring and has made 3 reverts in under 24 hours, what to show you are completely unbiased 100% yup yup, no bias from you, you are totally fair and impartial | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b7d867e013deb5d | I'm Kissing up
I want to kiss you ass | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b8cbc61ec11f8f5 | Heymid, why don't you focus on editing articles, like you've promised so very many times when begging to be unblocked, rather than wasting other people's time with administrative requests for something you have no use for? - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6b8e4725632e46c4 | MEGAN DAGER LOVES DOLPHINS
SARAH STARKEY LOVES MARK STANA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.