Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
6b8e902c4badc55c
" prep to update article - 2015 sources & citations peer reviewed Klein, Max, and Piotr Konieczn. ""Wikipedia in the World of Global Gender Inequality Indices."" Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration - OpenSym '15 (2015): n. pag. Web. . While Wikipedia's editor gender gap is important but difficult to measure, its biographical gender gap can more readily be measured. We correlate a Wikipedia-derived gender inequality indicator (WIGI), with four widespread gender inequality indices in use today (GDI, GEI, GGGI, and SIGI). Analysing their methodologies and correlations to Wikipedia, we find evidence that Wikipedia's bias in biographical coverage is related to the gender bias in positions of social power. Kalla, Joshua L., and Peter M. Aronow. ""Editorial Bias in Crowd-Sourced Political Information."" PLOS ONE PLoS ONE 10.9 (2015): n. pag. Web. . In this paper, we examine what kinds of biases exist in crowd-sourced information on Wikipedia. Because any user can also be an editor, no one person with any particular ideological or partisan motivation should be able to control Wikipedia. Yet scholars have recognized the tension that comes from distributed, crowd-sourced platforms like Wikipedia. On the one hand, crowd-sourced information platforms create opportunities for citizens to challenge media-driven narratives. On the other, these platforms may be captured by the self-interested who have the greatest motivation to shape them for their own benefit. mass media Many hands make Wikipedia work. (2015, December 10). Sydney Morning Herald [Sydney, Australia], p. 20. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.sfpl.org/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA436910759&sid;=summon&v;=2.1&u;=sfpl_main⁢=r&p;=STND&sw;=w&asid;=ec97e622b712616c8a2c1ff0dc58b220 We all use Wikipedia. It's hard to avoid. On just about any Google search, Wiki tops the list. Because it's also astoundingly comprehensive, intelligible and reliable, it has become the ubiquitous go-to start point. Yet almost the first research rule our kids learn is Wiki-denial. Read it if you must but, never, honey, never ever admit to it. ... So yes, Wikipedia is flawed. Above all, it needs more female input. But the obvious response, for you-and-me users who encounter something stupid or biased or just plain wrong, is to hop in there and fix it. I'll see you there, yes? Oh, and honey? Cite away! Wikipedia: A bias against women? (2014, Apr 13). The National Retrieved from http://ezproxy.sfpl.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1515588882?accountid=35117 Prof Bruckner's hope is that having systemic data on the extent and reasons behind bias could mobilise resources to deal with the issue. It might help, she suggests, if universities encouraged staff to become Wikipedia contributors, ensuring important academic work does not get ignored. They could, for example, expand the programmes some of them already run for academics on writing newspaper editorial columns - another area where female writers tend to be heavily outnumbered - to cover Wikipedia contributions. ""That is not something we usually do. We're scientists, we're not in the business of marketing our research. We have no training to do this,"" said Prof Bruckner. She admits she has never contributed to Wikipedia herself. The apparent bias could also be partly redressed by focusing on general initiatives to improve Wikipedia's quality. For Prof Bruckner, the Wikipedia project may also offer pointers about how the value of academic work in general is assessed. ""There is the gender issue, but also how people think about scholarship and what's reputable scholarship or not,"" she said."
0
0
0
0
0
0
6b9085161c3f35fd
Dude, that was slashdot-style flaimbait. You could have just ignored me. Anyway, it seems my sense of humor is seriously degrading after long studing hours... (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6b950a2933e13d89
Oh! And I will learn about blocking policy right now just in case he severely reverts anything that anyone edits, I will block him. Bye Bye 97.102.153.253
0
0
0
0
0
0
6b9c46b3d9e854b7
Well, I finally got round to posting something in the ANI thread today, ultimately linking to this thread, and I now feel like I am being railroaded in what I'm pretty sure is a disingenuous manner. Is there any point in me continuing at all when this crap is allowed to go on? -
0
0
1
0
0
0
6ba6001161e522b2
There is NO reason why this page should be merged back into the parent article. It has alot of info, and deserves its own article. Not to mention, it is pretty historical, considering career politician Arlen Specter was upset in the primary. Very rarely do Democrat incumbents ever lose primary elections. Also, Specter was supported by almost every single major Democratic figure. Again, having a seperate article is no brainer.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6badf9cabe106b42
" (UTC) The initial criticism was that Stringer should be added as a source. It appears nobody follows this Talk page who has the expertise in anthropology (nor even the common sense) to comprehend that Stringer is an expert source who should be added to this article and it is now a badly-outdated article, as no valid challenges have been brought forth that would exclude Stringer's opinion from Wikipedia articles (and despite the very long period given to Wikipedians to challenge it), and thus: I concur that this article should be unlocked, because, for example, see also my request for another year-old source to be updated, which is crucial as it is in the lede, and claiming that the RAO hypothesis is still the mainstream hypothesis in human evolution, when even those anthropologists who are cited as calling it the ""mainstream"" hypothesis have retracted that claim and you are therefore basically misinforming a new generation of K-12 students, year-by-year, as you've kept this page outdated since 2010. It is obvious that no Wikipedians with expertise in anthropology have editing-rights to this locked article and are being responsible enough to maintain this article since approximately 2010, not even responsible enough to add simple {update} and {POV dispute} types of tags. So, who locked this article? And why is it still locked for years when the person who locked it doesn't have either the due diligence and care, or else the expertise in anthropology, to maintain the page as being up-to-date within even three years, yet they took the responsibility for locking it and no ""elder Wikipedians"" have addressed the issue? Where can ""elder Wikipedians"" be found or contacted, to ask them to review the need to unlock this article and/or the abilities of the fool who locked it to not be allowed to lock articles then wander off and ignore, for years, perfectly valid requests ~~ ""valid"" scientifically speaking, as well as regarding Wikipedia's standards for veracity of expert sources ~~ to update this horribly out-of-date article? 209.97.203.60 04:40, 27 January 2014"
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bae49bf2757e767
I have nothing better to do than sit at my computer all day being a cunt on WikiPedia.
1
0
1
0
0
0
6bb5a7a213606db3
Hey, I just noticed your comments. If you are unhappy with the nomination, then feel free to withdraw(=delete) it. I did not realize you would mind.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bb83e528db8dbc8
" Tone Hi, just another nudge here, can I ask you to try really hard to avoid using the words ""you"" and ""your"" in the al-Durrah discussion? I know that you are very experienced with Wikipedia policies, but it is precisely because of that, that I'd really like to see you set a good example on the talkpage. If you disregard my requests, then it weakens my authority with everyone else, too. So, please? ) Thanks, onka "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bbcbe886105a546
" Thanks for the advice, but no thanks Citing an ArbCom case that has not even come near reaching a final decision won't get you far in going against the existing consensus in the articles you're altering. Oh thanks, this coming from the ""Chief Aider and Abeter"" of miscreants, Dan Tobias. What do you love about cyberstalking, sexual humiliation and harassment, Dan? It's very obvious it turns you on in some sick way, others have said the same thing in private channels. Take a look in the mirror, Dan. BTW, there is no consensus for including these sleazy sites and even Fred Bauder has stated it. Can you show me the consensus? For example Wikitruth has articles on notable topics like David Gerard Kelly Martin and FCYTravis do we want to make it easy for people to find this crap? This is not complicated, Dan. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bbe1f367bd1d695
" It would be really overdoing things to include convolutions with more input functions in the sandbox article, but I plan a gallery-like page in the info still to be uploaded to gnu.org. Development of the convolution theme includes other mathematical concepts. Far from being a ""one-trick pony"" you ought to know that the mathematics of the delta function, alone, lends itself to further visualization of subject matter routinely taught in dsp and related courses. Besides the ability to code, Development only needs imagination. As the article indicates, I too made the mistake that Fortran was a dinosaur. Fortran is under active development, surpassing the performance of C in certain areas. I also code in C, Lisp, Scheme, and will be writing some code for C-Graph in Python - but modern Fortran remains a good choice for the core code. There are websites that offer the demonstration of convolution, but none that encompass verification of the convolution theorem with ease, or that offer the range of features GNU C-Graph does. The download statistics verify C-Graph's growing popularity. The meritless claim of ""online promotion and documentation (marketing?)"" has been recited elsewhere and is transparent in its intent. Yes, you did miss the point. I won't comment on the other ""significant"" additional resources and external links listed in the articles on Convolution and Convolution Theorem, except that they hardly present ""new science"", which is not a requirement for a reference. No, it's not possible to deflate my ego. I'm accustomed to these types of responses - and use them as building blocks. Enough said. The reason more information on C-Graph is not already at GNU is because I find myself having to spend too much time dealing ""blocks"" in various forms. Wikipedians visiting this talk page have the text for the references should they choose to use them. Happy editing! Avoiding more convoluted conversation.:) - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bc71e2871b2233d
Thanks, Gerda! darkness
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bcb5801efaa3f6b
Breast cancer research stamp is one example that I have already pointed to. Again critical commentary is more than bare facts from the USPS or their museum, it requires third party discussion to be considered critical commentary.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bdc04ced28d94fe
" Please stop posting about this on my user talk page You have already brought up the ""attacks"" on other users in the Transitional Fossil talk page about three times now. It is in the past now, I have been punished already, and I would appreciate it if you stopped warning me about this on the talk page. Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6be22a1545325fe6
" Archiving deleted gay material It has been suggested the two are gay or suffering from gender confusion. Rod stated in 'Tis the Fifteenth Season he was jealous of girls because they get to wear dresses. In Bart to the Future, an episode depicting the future, Ned thanks Bart for not outing Rod and Todd who are shown bare-chested washing a cabinet in a slightly feminine way whilst wearing tight denim cut-off shorts and sporting mustaches, known as the Castro clone style fashionable in gay culture in the 1980s and popularized by Freddie Mercury. Rod and Todd are both extremely sheltered from girls as their father consider girls to be a temptation along with rock and roll music. In another future-set episode, ""Future-Drama"" Bart's girlfriend mentions she wants to make love to him on prom night, and becomes disappointed when he denies her. She says, ""I never had this problem with Todd Flanders!"", implying a strong, though latent, sexuality in the boy. Also, in Home Away From Homer, Ned moves away and then moves back to Springfield. When announcing this to the boys, Rod says he has a girlfriend. Benjiboi "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6be92b6a367478e6
Multi-chassis setup Someone familiar with the multi-chassis configuration should create a new section regarding that and explain how it's done, how many slots fabric interconnect cards take up if any, how could it handle the theorised 322 Tbps? (How fast are the inter-chassis interconnects? Maximum flows? Any practical limits? One flow completely saturating the whole fabric, etc..?)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bf2bfb729963461
You made a mistake You reverted an edit I made requesting a citation, and marked it as vandalism. The request for citation is appropriate by Wiki guidelines. Your assumption that said edit was vandalism also did not assume good faith, and I honestly have no idea how you could have come to the conclusion that it was vandalism.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bfd9b7a88fbdec0
" If you'd actually bothered to read the article talk page, instead of simply stating ""'Consensus on talk' doesn't mean a thing to me"", you might have noticed that Theowarner is in fact heavily in favour of trimming this article and has even expressed a desire to see it deleted. As to notability, point to ""significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"", and the tag will be removed expeditiously. The trouble is that none of us can actually find such significant reliable independent coverage. And how is sourcing almost the entire article to Craig and his ministry even remotely NPOV? ''TalkStalk''(P) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bfdee49fcbcfad6
" Saul Friedlander states that ""a man above all: Hitler"" started the process and that it was not ""generated in the machinery of Nazi and SS administration"". That is quite normal he argues in that direction, given he is an ""intentionalist"". The opposite quotes can be found as well Christopher R. Browning, The Path to Genocide: Essays on Launching the Final Solution, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p.87 writes ""Martin Broszat and Hans Mommsen, however argued that [the mass murder] occured without any specific and comprehensive Hitler decision or order. The system's automatic mechanisms for 'cumulative radicalization' more than Hitler's ideology and leadership explained the origin of the Final Solution"" Gerald Fleming, Hitler and the Final Solution, University of California Press, 1987, p.II writes ""It may be tempting to state that each approach has its merits and to seek an synthesis between the two positions. In fact, functionalism, which stresses the dynamics of a system instead of a central role of a leader, fits better in many ways within the mainstream of modern historiography. The image it offers of Nazism is more 'normal', easier to explain: any group can stumble hapharzadly, from step to step, into the most extreme criminal behavior. Responsibility remains obviously; but it is more deluted, more nebulous, because of the very automatism of the process, its outcome unforseeable, and because of the absence of real premeditation as well. Intentionalism at the other hand asserts that the course of action was in some way planned. This latter view gives Hitler a predominant role, but it also implies much greater awareness at various level; whereas functionalism pushed to its logical conclusion, gets very close to denying that Hitler had accurate knowledge of the Final Solution. It leaves most of the operation to subordinates agencies - in a nutshell, to police terror."" ... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6bfe78fd764dce08
Give me one reason to listen to a moron like you.
1
0
1
0
1
0
6c02fccad0f8dea1
Fine I COMPLETELY DISAGREE and I will find a source that supports my claims and resubmit after I am unblocked, I still havent heard an explanation as to why he can be uncivil to me but I cant be uncivil back. For the record I wasnt trying to be uncivil, the man just wouldnt listen to my argument a all. But expected me to obey him when I think the rules supported my case. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c09a7d1b1ed1cb4
" Isn't that what's meant by specifying ""large""? This was a dwarf sauropod, relatively speaking. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c0c3b257ab89fa9
If we are going to talk about Obama, why not called it the Gates Controversy or something similar, after all no charges were file, the arrest got a wave a media attention because of the President's comment. The heart of the matter is not the arrest but the response and the comments after all.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c0c8810e046ba85
How frustrating. I felt the same way after going for RfA and being told I didn't have enough edits, while AIV, RFPP and SD are all backlogged. Those of us who are willing to do this dirty work aren't being given the privileges to do it. And you are right, it will not be 3 months until you are nominated for admin again. I hope all is well ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c0edfdc8441150b
"52, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Macedonian point of view Why there is not the Macedonian point of view and where is the bloody division of Macedonia and where is the paragraph about the occupation of the Macedonian parts? So pathetic. Oui? 16:"
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c128f5378ab828b
" Chris Hallam With all due respect you inserted a great deal of text none of which sourced at all. If you add unsourced text it is subject to removal. I removed about half, those parts which were unacceptable. I recommend you read the above materials about editing Wikipedia, enumerated in the welcome message above. And ""talking to close friends"" is not evidence of properly sourced or even accurate text."
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c17ba9699887fa7
There's more than one Green lantern so it should say Harold Hal Jordan 24.38.188.96
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c1cbffb3552e4c6
User talk:Hesperian; Did anyone ask for your opinion. It would seem that Wackipedia is run along similar lines to NAZI Germany.
1
0
0
0
0
0
6c227d188c88856d
" IN fact what I want is that the article conform to WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD. No ""uninvolved"" editor apart from Darkness Shines have intervened here. Just the hindu nationalist propaganda team lead by Yogesh and yourself. ·snunɐw· "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c24abf2b0ee5829
" Tip Diannaa, when you block a user and they can't edit their talk page please use when that happens. '''SLAM''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c24e4b10e47829a
February 13 Again blatantly incorrect information in the same article as mentioned above.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c260a128085fdf9
Praytell, how is that POV? It's just pointing out the facts. I can provide sources for that 30K, even from Wikipedia: Abdullah Ocalan for one: Approximately 30,000 people were killed by PKK as a result of these attacks between 1984 and 2003. You have a funny way of detecting POV, in that it's quite wrong and you're reverting factual adds, which is against WP policy.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c29bb5beba627fe
on Dolega-Ossowski Please leave messages here:-
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c2a7b92062cbcee
Schisms? Which schism branches of the LDS church currently practice Baptism for the Dead? I was under the impression that only the LDS church still performs the ordnance.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c2b2579417ad358
r a stupid idiot james u moron, crazy, leprecaun, transvestite
1
0
1
0
1
1
6c36a69704a0392f
" Tsk tsk...you deleted and basically shoved me aside, without asking me in particular (on the talk page) what my opinion was on the article. If you have no true interest in an article, let others defend on a proper basis. Running roughshod over other people is such a fine American way; I guess you've acclimated to the American Dream (now called ""the dumbing down of America"" by Wikipedia). How fitting that you should play this game and fulfill expectation of standards that sysops are held to these days. Dead on with analysis of this place by everybody I encounter, whether educators, coworkers, family members, news reports or clergy. You prove it with everything you've done or written that I've thus far seen in your editorial history. Fine job of a self-fulfilling prophecy if I ever knew of one. Defencive as always, that old canard. It used to be that honourable people let no controversy be joined to their persons, but held the upper ground from start to finish. Thank you for your help in improving Wikipedia! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c4079227e962f7d
Unspecified source for Image:JBeggs.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:JBeggs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c4d58d668bf97f4
" I agree with you here WMC. The net of his contributions are a positive but his attitude and belief that everything he thinks is right no matter what others think is taxing. When it comes down to it, the only policy he's possibly violated is WP:CIVIL but I worry that his continued bumping of the line (never really crosses it) will chase away other editors to the point where people just let him do whatever he wants. I blow it off but other editors probably don't. The question I don't have an answer to is, do we expect all the other editors to sack up and deal with his attitude or ask him to tone it down a bit. '''Talktome "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c5176e076b26a9e
Tajikistan The population of Tajikistan as of 1939 census was 1.5m and 250,000 soldiers from Tajikistan participated in WWII. Of them 90,000 died. http://ria.ru/politics/20100419/224129198.html
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c598fca4ea3e699
Population in 2010 == Reliable sources indicate that the current population of Pakistan in mid 2010 is about 180,808,000 and not 169,000,000. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pk.html http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/population_of_pakistan_in_2010 I think this error should be corrected as their is a significant difference between the 2 values stated. ==
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c5b8f22c5d37bfa
"Note to all editors: Like others, I see a number of problems in this article, which seem to be largely the work of one individual. I notice, too, that about 90% of this Talk page is taken up discussing or arguing with this same person. I find the following things to be problematic: (1) Making up new meanings for Norse Words that contradict their actual meanings in all academically respected Old Norse dictionaries; (2) Altering dates of cited references, making them appear to be outdated, when in fact they are the preeminent academic reference works used by Old Norse scholars; (3) Citing instead reference works that really are out of date, even as noted in Wikipedia (Pokorny); (4) Linking to other internal or external articles that either do not support a statement or to articles that contradict it; (5) Editing that shows a complete lack of knowledge of Old Norse; (6) Editing that shows fundamental misunderstanding of linguistics; (7) A persistent pattern of wholesale reverting other's edits; (8) An admission of wholesale revert of the main article, or ""blatant vandalism."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c5d42e8660bec96
WP:NPOV is based on WP:WEIGHT. If a person has more press from WP:RS that is of a negative tone than positive tone than the tone of the article will reflect that, otherwise it won't be WP:NPOV but rather an article that is weighted unduly to the positive.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c61a44426d1e873
Note Don't impersonate an administrator, as you did here. That's only going to get you into trouble. Man
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c6557cf45f7b1ad
" July 2006 (UTC) The purpose of mentioning the percentage of UCR freshmen requiring remediation is not ""give an indication of the school's QUALITY in relation to other schools,"" as you say, but to provide a verifiable fact about UC Riverside. It is relevant, and it is informative. There's no reason to exclude this valuable statistic. 19:03, 27"
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c67e8bdc22676ec
You can dissuss it on WP:FOOTY.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c6f1e6637ce5331
What about the Raj??? What about the Raj history in the History section??? Reading the article, one feels as if such a thing never happened!!! 60.243.93.52
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c6f7d7d1c83030a
"Please, sign anything you post here with your signature by typing ""~~~~"" after your post. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c70eafd1a01b3b3
Block Hey man, sorry about that whole thing. I tried to be civil initially but that guy just made me so mad. I'll try my best not to let that happen again in the future.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c75123ecd06a433
So its bias is actually relative to that of its readers? .
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c78e2b910310465
She was also being very very mean at the second that I made it
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c7c7a4914f74e27
" And Rick Davies sings the ooh's in the outro to ""Goodbye Stranger"". — "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c7d096e1d16be21
Fuck you Why the fuck do you delete pages with no strong reason? You are a bloody motherfucker. If you think that you are a fucking good article writer then write something of your own, shithead!
1
1
1
0
1
0
6c8186dd6ddc272d
4 BC is an estimate. 8 BC to 4 BC is generally estimated, with some sources having a tighter estimate of 6 BC to 4 BC (Herod the Great died in 4 BC, and that provides the cut-off),
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c833d54d74e35c5
" A kitten for you! Thanks very much for your help on the JHU Molecular Biology course project this past semester. You gave really great feedback to us and to the students, and your reviews and comments were a huge help. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c837693b675ae06
I think your being a bit hard So your anti vandal, great. So your not going to do anthing where it say's the Kilwinning Ranger have won the champions leauge and Uefa cup. You are a bit of a dick
1
0
1
0
1
0
6c8949b4c85d7837
" Child's Play 3 Since the case is back in the news again, it is a good time to put to rest the tired old tabloid cliché that the killers were inspired by Child's Play 3. This was rejected by Merseyside Police and the Home Office, but it did not stop the tabloids from having a field day calling for the film to be banned. (talk to me) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c89f452be9a6370
asked favor i suspected it was,but just in case it wasn't,i had to try to make sure it was watched while i was gone.but still,sorry for the trouble since it is.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c8bf3cc88846f29
Are you even reading what I write? Read Bournatian one more time, this time more carefuly, he speifically covers the preiod which I was talking about, he also is the one providing the data of the Armenian emigration from Erivan region from 1795 to 1827, he document the desertion and the Armenian refugees in his works. He does not contradict what I am saying. And you new data, well, again, you are not reading me, I do not disagree about this, it was those years that Julfa was destroyed and its Armenian population deported this is also documented, the Armenians will later, during the Ottoman partial controls where Nakhichevan will be used as a storing place for the marchandises from India etc, recolonise that region and rebuild Julfa. I already contended that during the Mongol invasion the Armenian population dropped. What on the other hand I said was that pre Abbas in the 17th century just before the deportation, Armenians were there constituting a majority, and I have provided various works that equal the population to Armenian and I have also provided another work which you author you claim has not much knowledge. We are not talking about the same period at all. While I recognize every periods when Muslim have constituted a majority, with obstinence you refuse to listen as if Azerbaijan will lose Nakhichevan just because I wrote that and that you accepted it. Give yourself a brake Grandmaster, we are debating about this whole affair because of a simple word, just like your obstinence about the term enclave which you wanted to remove. (ix)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c8fc47d9c419cfe
"I have found further evidence related to this big hoax. The same user who wrote the Sacred Order of Skull and Crescent Article, and created The Pugilist Club article you cited, is also meddling with the Barbaro Family page. I found numerous inconsistencies with that SOSC (Sacred Order of Skull and Crescent) article which he attempted to explain away citing unnamed sources, or sources only he claims to have access to. He has edited my personal comments on the discussion page of that article in what appears to me to be an attempt to cover his mistakes. In the discussion page of his SOSC article he has referenced pugilism, Amelia Earhart, the Wright Brothers, and a letter by Daniel Russell to a Bro. Chase, a letter which is also cited in his article on the alleged Skull and Crescent Order as being one of their prized artifacts. The citing of this letter was the final straw for me. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but when I found that letter quite amazingly and coincidentally while researching Theta Nu Epsilon on ebay of all places, it became clear that the article on the Sacred Order of the Skull and Crescent was founded mainly, if not wholly, on this individual's fantasies. That letter can still be found on ebay by putting 200101453405, the item number into the ebay search. When I casually conronted the author of the Sacred Order of the Skull and Crescent wikipedia article with this, he initially presented a fantastic notion that perhaps the SOSC members were engaging in the ruse of selling their sacred artifacts to themselves in order to make them look worthless. When I gave the ebay item number, then he quite suddenly and conveniently recalled that oh yes, he just remembered that in his unavailable source it says they reprinted copies of this letter for their members and that this must be one of those ultra rare reprints. The buyer (obviously the author of the Skull and Crescent article, The Pugilist Club, and the bastardizer of the Barbaro Family page) left positive feedback for it. Any dullard can tell an original hand written letter from a copy, if it were a copy negative feedback would have been left. Then upon looking into the publicly available links to items this same person purchased on the online auction site, I found many other fraternity related items as well as Amelia Earhart, Wright Brothers, and pugilism posters! Now I find the author's wikipedia alias is Tiki-Two. Well, that name is almost exactly what the ebay user who purchased this masonic letter uses! I do not know what his motives are, but it seems he (perhaps in conjunction with associates) are building a hoax on wikipedia, possibly as members of a fraternity. It is possible that he is building a collection of items that he intends to present and cite in articles as important artifacts of secret societies. As a relative outsider to wikipedia, I don't know what course to take, and really don't have the time to find out. I mainly enjoy reading wikipedia articles, not engaging in what to me is vain online argumentation. This individual may find and delete this post, but hopefully it will get through to someone at wikipedia who knows what to do. Wikipedia should not be used to further some publicity stunt or fraternity hoax. There is no record anywhere else online of a Vitus Sebastian Barbaro that I can find. There is no record anywhere else online of The Sacred Order of Skull and Crescent either. There is no record of a ""Pugilist Club"" aka ""Fight Club"" at Purdue anywhere else online. This won't be the only place I send the above information. [email protected] July 5, 20:02 PST "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6c971ba181c04772
" WikiCup and GA Reviews Hi J Milburn. I just noticed your post on White Shadows' talk page, coincidentally, just after completing a GA review. I wasn't aware they were worth points. Anyway, I was just wondering, what constitutes a review being worth points? Does a user have to cite specific examples for the nominator to fix? Make lots of suggestions? What happens when a person reviews a particularly good article that doesn't have problems at the good article level? I understand that the reviews are only worth 2 points; I'm just curious. Thanks, ''''''thor "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ca71d4f658944f8
If it still needs to be deleted, delete it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cab4e88322d46f0
Is it so? Thanks for pointing out. Regard. (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cad3447414e7a7d
Just thought you would find this article I did interesting. Lepore syndrome. Check the history and the talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cc309e52ec91f06
per WP:Fresh start and due to constructive edits that only improve Wikipedia. No one who actually wants to build an encyclopedia has any issues with me and nor would they. Bad faith and disruptive deletionist account Kww has an obvious conflict of interest (see his RfAs) and should have nothing to do administratively with regards to me. If this request needs to be forwarded to arbitrators, please do so. Thank you for your time and help!
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cce2f453e808d99
"""That’s important: An object under the influence of nongravitational forces (like sunlight pressure) can have a difficult orbit to predict, so the more observations of it we have, the better we’ll understand just how these forces work on small objects."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cd0efd8fa9c3b76
. Material supported by reliable sources should never be removed
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cd27d7e895c6bef
", 21 October 2013 (UTC) She tilts her head up after she's been restrained and barked at. She's visibly not happy with the situation but capitulates in order to not be harmed further, which is the definition of rape/sexual assault. I don't know what you would call ""Kiss me!"" and ""Tell me you want me!"" if not a command or an order. Even BDSM practitioners would call it that. Even you calling them ""lovers"" in your edit is offensive. You clearly want to scrub the scene of any ambiguity from the scene by calling it consenual- which in itself is personal analysis and inappropriate. 17:47"
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cd5a156e218b7b8
Stop your nonsense. It is clear that you lack the intelligence to know and identify famous historical han chinese people, so you edited the han chinese page and changed the infobox, changing a famous scientist like Zhang Heng to an actress that nobody in the world cares.
1
0
0
0
0
0
6cd763dcd58f08ee
do not know if you are a collector of comics but if you own the book then perhaps you should read it before deciding that someone else did not.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cd8b7d8a5499520
" 'Oppose per GTBacchus. The correct facts for this American-born baseball player are that the right form oof his name is ""Eduardo Perez"", and that can be seen in things such as his 2006 Seattle Mariners jersey in a video clip at , another video clip in his 2005 Tampa Bay Devil Rays jersey, etc. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cd9927b6368356b
OK! Let's just all agree that there is a distincion between different types of Bass! Let's list them. Acoustic-not amplifiable Electric-more like a guitar, amplifiable Upright Electric-amplifiable, upright, taller Upright-upright, taller double-depends, deeper or 2 necks String types 3 stringer-one string taken away 4 stringer-basic bass 5 stringer-higher or lower string added(usually lower) Now can we just agree that there are lots of different stringed instruments? Yes? good. Signed,
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cdea47fc3bf4a60
" Hm, les Tricolores? Several sources indicate that ""Le Tricolore"" is the correct term, haven't found any references to ""Les Tricolores"". 15:11, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ce0d0a0878852f6
About St.Thomas I made these changes for the simple reason that they were not backed by any proof. Some of these stories are even disputed in the site hamsa.org (which is linked through the article in History of Chennai) and the site seemed very credible.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ce13d188433d19b
You are incorrect regarding the further need of a zygote for the supply of material (or for that matter, information) from the mother. There are simple cases where this is incorrect.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ce30e8ee6efcc20
. So linguistics may tell us that wiradjuri = No. It doesn't. The word means what it does similar to 'sign's' referent = sign, or words mean what they do not what they don't.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ce80c9d6bc099e1
HighKing Your closure of that ANI report is unwise at best, abusive at worst. Ample evidence of wrong doing has been provided, maybe not with respect to the BI sanction (but even that is not clear cut, given it is meant to be broadly construed), but definitely in the sense that these edits are clearly the same terminology policing behaviour that led to that sanction, but on a slightly different BI related term. Action is clearly warranted. Archived or not, as I said, I am not going to let this lie, I will be informing Cailil when he returns. In addition to sanctioning Highking, I expect he will want to take issue with you disrespecting him by completely ignoring all the effort he went to in detailing exactly what is wrong with HighKing's behaviour, and what he should be avoiding. Who I am is completely and utterly irrelevant to whether or not HighKing is ignoring those warnings and engaging in the beahviour Cailil described as being not wanted here. He even made that exact point to HighKing - while Cailil has sympathy with the so called harassment he often claims to be suffering as a way of avoiding sanctions for making these edits, Cailil was crystal clear on the point that who reports him, or even just the mere presence of suspect accounts in any of these reports/disputes, has absolutely no bearing on whether or not he will act on any poor behaviour he observes from HighKing. I know he has previously expressed frustration at seemingly being the only admin here who is prepared to deal with HighKing, and I can see why with actions like this. Your closure of the section simply because of who the complainents are has only one effect - rewarding HighKing for bad edits. It's really no skin off my nose, is it? If I am a banned user, do you think archiving that discussion will have any effect on me? Or if I am not banned but this is just not my main account, then do you think archiving the section is going to change whatever reason I might have for not posting there with my main account? Of course not. The only thing it achieves is to remove from sight as an immediate issue. Which, given the fact Cailil was at pains to point out that HighKing's poor behaviour stretches back to 2008, is not a good thing for Wikipedia. You're an admin. You're expected to deal with long term problems, not sweep them under the carpet for wholly irrelevant reasons. If HighKing were ever to end up at arbitration for example, do you think he would escape sanction for persistent WP:TE behaviour, simply because other people involved were not following some completely unrelated rule like WP:SOCK? Of course not. Hopefully you can at least appreciate that as an admin, you being the person who maintains that cycle of WP:TE, is not only bad for Wikipedia, it's a form of laxity that really isn't excused by who I may or may not be. It also had the material effect of me not being able to correct Murray on a basic point of fact, meaning the archive now has errors in it, which I am sure is not the intent of that facility. Archive or no archive, at the very least, if, or more likely when, Cailil sanctions HighKing for those edits, I expect you to hold your hands up and admit your failure to do your duty as an admin in this case. Anything less will simply fall well below the expected standards of admins on Wikipedia. Anyway, I've probably spent far too long typing a post that you will most likely just ignore and delete, so goodbye for now.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ced4b02eec7ad0f
User talk:86.29.142.126 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. 86.29.142.126
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cee2e9fb024dff0
The article covers material beyond a mere dictionary definition. I disagree that this is a candidate for moving to Wiktionary, and I am removing the tag. If consensus on this page should reveal otherwise, then I'll help condense (and it will take a lot of condensing) and move the term, but not until then. —'''''' (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cef0bd8379baf18
" Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro (Batch 1) Lifespan expiry date Lifespan expiry dateRegistration no.25 Apr 2028SBS6000L, SBS6001J12 May 2028SBS6002G - SBS6005Z18 May 2028SBS6006X - SBS6008R26 May 2028SBS6009M - SBS6015U30 May 2028SBS6016S5 Jun 2028SBS6017P - SBS6024T8 Jun 2028SBS6025R - SBS6028H12 Jun 2028SBS6029E - SBS6034P15 Jun 2028SBS6035L - SBS6038D23 Jun 2028SBS6039B - SBS6041T27 Jun 2028SBS6043M - SBS6045H28 Jun 2028SBS6046E, SBS6048A - SBS6050S7 Jul 2028SBS6042R, SBS6047C, SBS6051P - SBS6053J10 Jul 2028SBS6054G14 Jul 2028SBS6055D - SBS6059T, SBS6061K26 Jul 2028SBS6060M, SBS6062H - SBS6064C7 Aug 2028SBS6065A, SBS6067U, SBS6068S15 Aug 2028SBS6077R - SBS6079K, SBS6081C16 Aug 2028SBS6082A - SBS6085S21 Aug 2028SBS6066Y, SBS6069P - SBS6076T, SBS6080E22 Aug 2028SBS6086P - SBS6091Z14 Sep 2028SBS6092X, SBS6093T, SBS6095M - SBS6097H26 Sep 2028SBS6099C, SBS6100G, SBS6102B, SBS6103Z, SBS6105T, SBS6108K, SBS6109H9 Oct 2028SBS6106R, SBS6110C - SBS6114S, SBS6118G - SBS6121X11 Oct 2028SBS6098E, SBS6115P, SBS6122T, SBS6124M, SBS6130U13 Oct 2028SBS6094R, SBS6116L, SBS6117J, SBS6126H20 Oct 2028SBS6125K, SBS6127E - SBS6129A, SBS6132P, SBS6135G13 Nov 2028SBS6131S, SBS6133L, SBS6134J, SBS6137B, SBS6138Z, SBS6140R16 Nov 2028SBS6104X, SBS6123R, SBS6136D, SBS6141M, SBS6142K24 Nov 2028SBS6139X, SBS6144E - SBS6146A30 Nov 2028SBS6143H, SBS6147Y7 Dec 2028SBS6107M, SBS6148U, SBS6149S28 Dec 2028SBS6101D29 Jan 2029SBS6151J, SBS6153D2 Feb 2029SBS6159M, SBS6160H5 Feb 2029SBS6150L, SBS6152G, SBS6157T9 Feb 2029SBS6154B, SBS6158R, SBS6161E13 Feb 2029SBS6163A - SBS6165U, SBS6167P16 Feb 2029SBS6156X, SBS6162C, SBS6168L26 Feb 2029SBS6155Z, SBS6166S, SBS6170D, SBS6172Z27 Feb 2029SBS6173X, SBS6175R, SBS6176M, SBS6184P7 Mar 2029SBS6171B, SBS6174T, SBS6179E, SBS6180A8 Mar 2029SBS6181Y, SBS6182U25 Mar 2029SBS6183S, SBS6185L, SBS6187G - SBS6189B29 Mar 2029SBS6178H, SBS6186J, SBS6191T - SBS6193M11 Apr 2029SBS6190X, SBS6194K, SBS6196E, SBS6197C, SBS6199Y - SBS6201Z24 Apr 2029SBS6198A, SBS6202X - SBS6204R26 Apr 2029SBS6206K - SBS6208E, SBS6210Y, SBS6211U, SBS6213P, SBS6216G, SBS6218B, SBS6222M1 May 2029SBS6205M7 May 2029SBS6217D, SBS6219Z, SBS6220T10 May 2029SBS6209C, SBS6221R, SBS6223K - SBS6227A17 May 2029SBS6212S, SBS6214L, SBS6215J, SBS6228Y22 May 2029SBS6242E - SBS6244A24 May 2029SBS6234D, SBS6235B, SBS6237X - SBS6239R27 May 2029SBS6240K, SBS6246U, SBS6252B29 May 2029SBS6229U - SBS6232J14 Jun 2029SBS6233G, SBS6247S, SBS6249L, SBS6254X17 Jun 2029SBS6270Z, SBS6271X, SBS6275K, SBS6276H, SBS6280U, SBS6281S, SBS6285G24 Jun 2029SBS6195H, SBS6248P26 Jun 2029SBS6251D, SBS6253Z, SBS6272T5 Aug 2029SBS6256R Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro (BSEP Batch 1) Lifespan expiry date {| class=""toccolours"" border=""1"" cellpadding=""3"" style=""border-collapse:collapse"" |-bgcolor=#5D1E79 !Lifespan exp
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cf11a925aa91463
" Apparently, the dispute is over whether the term ""Greek Macedonians"" should be used to refer to the Greek Macedonians. While it is a sourced term and is in use by academics as has been demonstrated above, there is a strong refusal to including it. The Greek insistence to including this term is primarily to prevent the much feared monopolisation of the name ""Macedonia"" by Fyrom, whose editors oppose using the term for reasons I have difficulty understanding. I have already said that I'd agree to removing the term ""Greek Macedonians"" (other Greek users haven't) if the disambiguation note were to be expanded so as to avoid the monopolisation. This proposal was ignored. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cf11fe93604823b
Hey Kevin D You like weird music. And why don't I have any classes with you this term, what the hell are you taking ? I have no one to copy from D:
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cfc54955d8b806e
Everyone should be able to read the IPA if they're on Wikipedia. If you can't, either educate yourself or get the fuck out of here. you cannot use a spelled pronunciation because the pronunciation of that will depend on the native dialect of the person reading it. An Australian will pronounce the same spelled pronunciation differently than an American will, don't you get it? You CAN'T use a spelled pronunciation unless only speakers of ONE dialect wil be reading it, which is not the case with Wikipedia. You MUST use the IPA!
0
0
0
0
0
0
6cfc55263bece86f
Looked through this article. Why do you think that RD entry is made (or meant) to irritate other users? (That wasn't the intention, however.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d04a2619bd46622
Conspiracy/Complicity Hi, I just posted a message here: Talk:9/11_domestic_conspiracy_theory where I point out that a tiny handful of folks are bouncing from page to page renaming pages and asking for votes on titles as a way to circumvent an ongoing discussion that has been going on for months. Is there a way to facilitate a discussion on one special page to try to resolve the title question that will affect many pages? The details are on the linked page. Thanks for all your hard work.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d0a678d470b839b
Your problematic editing Is too much to ask you to try and edit according to the Manual of Style (MOS) policies instead of your own idiosyncratic preferences? Your editing is frequently riddled with many blatant MOS mistakes which require reverting. Before you do any further editing I suggest you spend some time studying the MOS. Any mistakes you make that I notice will be reverted so you will be wasting both your own time as well as mine.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d0c838c1458662b
, 8 July 2007 (UTC) The problem is that a lot of the references used are hopelessly biased, or plain wrong. You will see I have tried to replace some with authorative sources rather than internet rants. However, I do find it hard to have someone tell me what the currency used in Gibraltar is when they have never seen it and I use it every day. Its also frustrating that articles about real things of interest are deleted and total rubbish like Fly Gibraltar are kept when fewer people voted to retain them. However, unlike George Bush I do not get messages direct from God, so don't worry too much, and if I did I'd ignore them. 20:30
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d0ee106f059bd14
According to Pjacobi's suggestion I propose to follow Pauli's presentation of the second postulate, as it has less risk of being misunderstood. Thus: The speed of light is independent of the motion of the light source.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d124f17aa3e5099
Actually Hesperornis is looking pretty well-developed (which is good), equally (for the amibtious), Phorusrhacos is notable in its poorer quality... (talk · contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d150a33f11d1888
"::(i) I have not claimed that different subjects do not contribute to 3RR, and explicitly counted the revert on another subject in my count. (ii) I would however assert that it does contribute (along with the time lapse) to whether an WP:EDITWAR is obvious, and thus to your no-warning/""especially as an experienced editor you should know better"" comment. (iii) You continue to fail to address the fact that I (a) reported the conflict, (b) did not edit the article thereafter (for the four hours before the block) & (c) did not edit between the warning and the block. ''TalkStalk''(P) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d15320bdc9e0505
" twat2 email but not email for gods sake don't put the connection speed we are paying for onscreen anywhere i mean that would be fucking ridiculous much better to delete fucking links all the time and offer no explanation or even bother to monitor or explain to someone adding the same edit over and over again why the hell you are deliberately wasting my time when you can put on the edit page that you have deliberately banned the link despite it being a perfectly valid link for a youtube video made using a samcoupe for gods sake what is up with you idiots do you want to have a section in your community where you list the reasons why no one wants to use a fone modem at the speed the modem is designed to work at? do you want to also list why displaying info onscreen is a matter of guessing the screen resolution and font size each time or are we just going with the ibm supplied computers for hitler that's good enough for us logic you fascist cunts stop fucking robbing folk wankers rogerjowett "
1
0
1
0
1
0
6d1bb8c776a8a9c3
" You're welcome. I don't dispute your action in removing it, because the likelihood is that knee-jerk reactions by reviewers will take against it in just that manner. Yet when did ""write a featured article"" come to mean removing good sources? If we start making reactions like that, it's time to look at the fundamental goals and very hard at any secondary practices that have come to limit us in achieving them. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d1f407870cf0e22
" Oppose The proposed name violates MOSTM. Spyke "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d22ff64719540b3
" Because even I am not sure of the other Idols (season 3) surnames, Floortje & Ellen along with I-Jay (stage name) are the only contestants with full names (that I know of), it encourages people to make a page for them. If I do come across another surname, I will surely add it, then wikify that Idol, after all I cant just wikify ""Ellen"" after all there wouldn't be a point. I've looked at Idols but they only have the 3 above that I mentioned. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d2600e8a453d9f2
" Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a site like Myspace for people to write about themselves and their friends. It is a project to build an encyclopedia, and you can find out more about it at the WP:Five pillars, the WP:Welcome page, and the guide to writing WP:Your first article. Also, I thing it would be a good idea for you to read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, particularly the section headed ""Your safety and security"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d2630197fd6a55f
"::LjL, carefully read the following caption, which is the ONLY reason why we're having this discussion: ""Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( 68.173.95.177 ) at the end of your comment."" This post is located just above these comments. Would you like me to help you find the exact place on this page where it is located? Or, maybe SineBot can help you find it. Hopefully, you'll find it. You americans are good at finding things, even things which don't exist. 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d2800cfd435d4b2
Hawk advocacy Some or all of the points from the sources cited in this blog post would be useful in the article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d33a0d202874b4b
" Well, the problem is the word ""may"" which is non-committal and effectively leaves the matter to editors' discretion so that a consensus has to be reached. I'm sorry, I don't understand the term ""flagcruft"". The relevance is that the teams were multi-national and, in most team sports where international matches take place (e.g., football, cricket, rugby, etc.) the nationality of an individual player is deemed noteworthy. For example, why do Liverpool fans nowadays display the Uruguay flag at matches? Nationality is relevant and flagicons are simply a graphic means of conveying the information. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d36941f35a94232
" I did not put enough attention to the changes. It seems to me it was done long time ago. I changed it with historical reference. See: ""Nazis' idea 1936"" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d4235a8222ae115
" Here is the record from the Parliament of India: Neither his father, nor his mother have the lastname ""Yadav"". This is a fact that is never publicized but should be made known to people.70.76.85.36 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
6d446bd48f6ec84c
Also, Toot and Puddle haven't been on since summer 2012. Ouch.
0
0
0
0
0
0