labels
class label 2
classes | premise
stringlengths 0
563k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 18
65
| task
stringlengths 3
43
|
|---|---|---|---|
0entailment
| Looks like I lost about ten followers yesterday. #lol #bye #LoveWins #SemST | This example is none. | tweet_eval/stance_atheism |
0entailment
| Isn't CO2 impact on warming logarithmic, and at current levels, 390 ppm, incremental impact negligible? #NDP #SemST | This example is favor. | tweet_eval/stance_climate |
0entailment
| @user @user why is men in front of women, you misogynistic pig #SemST | This example is favor. | tweet_eval/stance_feminist |
2contradiction
| @user @user @user Thank you so much for FAVs and RTs!!! #WakeUpAmerica #SemST | This example is favor. | tweet_eval/stance_hillary |
0entailment
| What goes up must come down... Very slowly, with help, and hover until Sagiv says to let go. … | This example is 😜. | tweet_eval/emoji |
2contradiction
| Even if they get out of this immediate crisis by rearranging the deck chairs tomorrows customers may have moved on, content to interact and use content in fundamentally different ways.
i learned of the passing yesterday of a wonderful man and friend. | This example is thereby,. | discovery/discovery |
0entailment
| oh, what? | This example is Wh-Question. | pragmeval/switchboard |
0entailment
| i have one question i get one response. | This example is Expansions of y/n Answers. | pragmeval/mrda |
0entailment
| the proposals are certainly reasonable and should also be extended to include on-line booking services | This example is unverifiable. | pragmeval/verifiability |
0entailment
| a russian man met a woman for a drink in a sauna and woke up to find his testicles stolen
this soap opera star reportedly had his testicles stolen by an attractive blonde organ trafficker | This example is observing. | pragmeval/emergent |
2contradiction
| in this study we used eye-tracking in the first stage of exploring audience experience of the extensive spanish art collections of county durham , of which the 13 zurbarán artworks ( there are actually only 12 zurbarán artworks , the 13th benjamin , is a copy by arthur pond ) are a key part of ,
to investigate the ways in which audiences look at spanish art , how aesthetic experience is evaluated and whether audiences can be encouraged to approach art in different ways . | This example is no_relation. | pragmeval/gum |
0entailment
| no safety problems with the products are known
the drugs are still available under other brand names | This example is Conjunction. | pragmeval/pdtb |
0entailment
| ok wood then?
i have wood but guess what | This example is Question_answer_pair. | pragmeval/stac |
2contradiction
| is this the sort of thing that is being taught at that bastion of liberal science, mit? how can this be presented as fact rather than theory?new and improved nuclear fuel creatednuclear fission, neutrons and protons, and even the atom itself are just theories. no one has ever seen an atom or a neutron. no one has ever observed an atom split. why are our liberal news media allowed to present this as fact?moreover, aren't nuclear reactors designed by intelligent humans? i also notice that this research was funded by our hard earned tax dollars without requiring that the benevolence of god also be researched in equal time. this is yet another shameful example of the godless attitude of science.
thankyou for bringing to my attention that atoms, neutrons and protons are merely scientific assumptions. now as i gaze at the night sky with all its' bits and pieces spinning around each other i can sleep happily knowing that our solar system is not part of a housebrick afterall. | This example is notsarc. | pragmeval/sarcasm |
0entailment
| aha ... | This example is Neutral. | silicone/sem |
0entailment
| it keeps on saying um you know you | This example is inform. | silicone/oasis |
0entailment
| All right then , we 'll have a definite answer for you on Monday , but I think I can say with some confidence , you 'll fit in well here . | This example is neutral. | silicone/meld_s |
2contradiction
| All right then , we 'll have a definite answer for you on Monday , but I think I can say with some confidence , you 'll fit in well here . | This example is fear. | silicone/meld_e |
0entailment
| right | This example is ready. | silicone/maptask |
2contradiction
| i downloaded it so that i didn't have to remember to return it . | This example is surprise. | silicone/dyda_e |
2contradiction
| i downloaded it so that i didn't have to remember to return it . | This example is directive. | silicone/dyda_da |
2contradiction
| Well sure. | This example is sur. | silicone/iemocap |
0entailment
| 329 U.S. 230
67 S.Ct. 252
91 L.Ed. 209
UNITED STATESv.CARMACK.
No. 40.
Argued Oct. 18, 1946.
Decided Dec. 9, 1946.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1947.
See 329 U.S. 834, 67 S.Ct. 627.
[Syllabus from pages 230-232 intentionally omitted]
Mr.John J. Cooney, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. J. R. Kelso, of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
1
This proceeding was instituted by the United States to condemn land as a site for a post office and customhouse in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, in reliance upon several federal statutes, including the general Condemnation Act of August 1, 1888, and the Public Buildings Act of May 25, 1926.1 The City and site were selected by the Federal Works Administrator and the Postmaster General acting jointly under the Public Buildings Act. The principal issue is: Was the Federal Works Administrator authorized by the foregoing statutes to acquire by condemnation land held in trust and used by the City for such public purposes as those of a local park, courthouse, city hall and public library?
2
In 1941, the United States petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to condemn as a site for a United States post office and customhouse about one and one-half acres, near the center of the City of Cape Girardeau, together with the improvements thereon except a public library building. This site was part of a four acre public park and the improvements to be condemned included a building used as the county courthouse and city hall, a memorial fountain, a small memorial monument and a portion of a bandstand. The library building apparently was to be removed by its owners on 30 days' notice from the United States.
3
The petition included as parties defendant the City and County, numerous officials and all known and unknown heirs or others who might claim an interest in this site especially through those who conveyed it, in trust, in 1807 to the Commissioners of the District or, in trust, in 1820 to the inhabitants of the Town of Cape Girardeau. Respondent was the only defendant to file an answer. Finding that she had no interest permitting her to maintain the defenses she asserted, the District Court entered a preliminary decree in favor of the United States. On respondent's appeal the Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the cause for further proceedings consistent with its opinion holding that the respondent had a special interest entitling her to object to the property being taken for a purpose destructive of the public use to which it had been dedicated by her ancestors. Carmack v. United States, 8 Cir., 135 F.2d 196.
4
In 1944, on retrial before a different judge, the District Court recognized the respondent as entitled to contest the condemnation and, at the direction of the Circuit Court of Appeals, heard evidence as to whether or not the officials of the United States acted capriciously and arbitrarily in selecting this site. It held that 'the selection of the site described in the petition, under all the facts re erred to, amounts in law to an arbitrary and unnecessary act' and dismissed the petition. United States v. Certain Land Situate in City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., D.C., 55 F.Supp. 555, 564. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the ground that the Federal Works Administrator and the Postmaster General did not have sufficient statutory authority 'to take the particular land sought to be condemned.' It then expressly found it unnecessary to consider whether or not the federal officials had acted 'capriciously or arbitrarily.' United States v. Carmack, 151 F.2d 881, 882. Because of the importance of the construction of the statutes authorizing the condemnation of land for federal uses, we granted certiorari. 327 U.S. 775, 66 S.Ct. 959.2
5
Both the general Condemnation Act and the Public Buildings Act3 expressly authorized the acquisition of land by the United States by condemnation as a site for a United States post office, customhouse or courthouse. Neither Act expressly named the City or designated the site to be condemned in this case. Neither expressly stated whether or not sites already in use for conflicting federal, state or local public purposes were subject to condemnation. The Condemnation Act supplemented the federal right 'to procure real estate for the erection of a public building or for other public uses,' by adding to it a general federal power of condemnation under judicial process to be exercised by an officer of the Government 'whenever in his opinion it is necessary or advantageous to the Government to do so.' The Public Buildings Act, as an incident to an original $150,000,000 program, gave authority and direction to the Secretary of the Treasury (later substituting the Federal Works Administrator) 'to acquire by purchase, condemnation, or otherwise, such sites * * * as he may deem necessary, * * *.' It specified that as to 'buildings to be used in whole or in part for postoffice purposes, the Federal Works Administrator, under regulations to be prescribed by him, shall act jointly with the Postmaster General in the selection of towns or cities in which buildings are to be constructed and the selection of sites therein: * * *.'4 These Acts were natural means for Congress to adopt in putting its constitutional powers into use on a scale commensurate with the size of the nation and the need of the time. Neither Act imposed expressly any limitations upon the authority of the officials designated by Congress to exercise its power of condemnation in procuring sites for public buildings deemed necessary by such officials to enable the Government to perform certain specified functions.5 Far removed from the time and circumstances that led to the enactment of these statutes in 1888 and 1926, this Court must be slow to read into them today unexpressed limitations restricting the authority of the very officials named in the Acts as the ones upon whom Congress chose to rely.
6
The power of eminent domain is essential to a sovereign government. If the United States has determined its need for certain land for a public use that is within its federal sovereign powers, it must have the right to appropriate that land. Otherwise, the owner of the land, by refusing to sell it or by consenting to do so only at an unreasonably high price, is enabled to subordinate the constitutional powers of Congress to his personal will. The Fifth Amendment, in turn, provides him with important protection against abuse of the power of eminent domain by the Federal Government.6
7
While in its early days the Federal Government filed its condemnation cases in the State courts, this Court, in Kohl v. United States, 91 U.S. 367, 23 L.Ed. 449, disposed of the idea that this was necessary. In that case, which has become the leading case on the federal power of eminent domain, Mr. Justice Strong also said:
8
'It has not been seriously contended during the argument that the United States government is without power to appropriate lands or other property within the States for its own uses, and to enable it to perform its proper functions. Such an authority is essential to its independent existence and perpetuity. These cannot be preserved if the obstinacy of a private person, or if any other authority, can prevent the acquisition of the means or instruments by which alone governmental functions can be performed. The powers vested by the Constitution in the general government demand for their exercise the acquisition of lands in all the States. These are needed for forts, armories, and arsenals, for navy-yards and light-houses for custom-houses, post-offices, and court-houses, and for other public uses. If the right to acquire property for such uses may be made a barren right by the unwillingness of property-holders to sell, or by the action of a State prohibiting a sale to the Federal government, the constitutional grants of power may be rendered nugatory, and the government is dependent for its practical existence upon the will of a State, or even upon that of a private citizen. This cannot be. No one doubts the existence in the State governments of the right of eminent domain,—a right distinct from and paramount to the right of ultimate ownership. It grows out of the necessities of their being, not out of the tenure by which lands are held. It may be exercised, though the lands are not held by grant from the government, either mediately or immediately, and independent of the consideration whether they would escheat to the government in case of a failure of heirs. The right is the offspring of political necessity; and it is inseparable from sovereignty, unless denied to it by its fundamental law. * * * But it is no more necessary for the exercise of the powers of a State government than it is for the exercise of the conceded powers of the Federal government. That government is as sovereign within its sphere as the States are within theirs. True, its sphere is limited. Certain subjects only are committed to it; but its power over those subjects is as full and complete as is the power of the States over the subjects to which their sovereignty extends.
9
'If the United States have the power, it must be complete in itself. It can neither be enlarged nor diminished by a State. Nor can any State prescribe the manner in which it must be exercised. The consent of a State can never be a condition precedent to its enjoyment.' (Italics supplied.) Kohl v. United States, supra, 91 U.S. 371, 372, 374, 23 L.Ed. 449.
10
The Kohl case approved the condemnation of privately owned land, then subject to a perpetual leasehold, for a post office site in Cincinnati, Ohio, under an Act of Congress expressly naming that City but not expressly naming the site. The respondent here seeks, by judicial interpretation of the general Condemnation Act and the Public Buildings Act, to exclude from condemnation a particular site in Cape Girardeau selected for a post office by the appropriate federal officials. She depends upon the fact that the site already is being used by a governmental subdivision of Missouri for other public purposes impressed upon it by its private owners over a century ago. The principle of federal supremacy, so well expressed in the Kohl case, argues against such a subordination of the decisions of federal representatives to those of individual grantors or local officials as to the means of carrying out an admittedly federal governmental function.7
11
It makes little difference that the site here sought to be condemned is held by the City in trust instead of in fee. The city government is not resisting the condemnation. The Federal Government can obtain, by voluntary conveyance, whatever title the City can convey. The weakness in the City's right to sell or exchange this site arises from restrictions in the conveyance to it. Through the inclusion, as defendants, of all claimants who might rely upon such restrictions or might claim an interest through the grantors of this site, a decree of condemnation will dispose of the suggested defects. By giving notice to all claimants to a disputed title, condemnation proceedings provide a judicial process for securing better title against all the world than may be obtained by voluntary conveyance.
12
Both in themselves and from the relation of these Acts to the Constitution, we find substantial reason for making their broad language effective to its full constitutional limit. While the federal power of eminent domain is limited to taking property for federal public uses, the question of the existence of a federal public use presents no difficulty here because the constitutional power of Congress to establish post offices is express.8
13
The considerations that made it appropriate for the Constitution to declare that the Constitution of the United States, and the laws of the United States made in pursuance thereof, shall be the supreme law of the land9 make it appropriate to recognize that the power of eminent domain, when exercised by Congress within its constitutional powers, be equally supreme. Mr. Justice Bradley stated this principle clearly, while on circuit, in Stockton v. Baltimore & N.Y.R. Co., C.C., 32 F. 9, 19: 'The argument based upon the doctrine that the states have the eminent domain or highest dominion in the lands comprised within their limits, and that the United States have no dominion in such lands, cannot avail to frustrate the supremacy given by the constitution to the government of the United States in all matters within the scope of its sovereignty. This is not a matter of words, but of things. If it is necessary that the United States government should have an eminent domain still higher than that of the state, in order that it may fully carry out the objects and purposes of the constitution, then it has it. Whatever may be the necessities or conclusions of theoretical law as to eminent domain or anything else, it must be received as a postulate of the constitution that the government of the United States is invested with full and complete power to execute and carry out its purposes.'10
14
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution says 'nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.' This is a tacit recognition of a preexisting power to take private property for public use, rather than a grant of new power.11 It imposes on the Federal Government the obligation to pay just compensation when it takes another's property for public use in accordance with the federal sovereign power to appropriate it. Accordingly, when the Federal Government thus takes for a federal public use the independently held and controlled property of a state or of a local subdivision, the Federal Government recognizes its obligation to pay just compensation for it and it is conceded in this ca e that the Federal Government must pay must compensation for the land condemned.12
15
The foregoing establishes the principle of the supremacy of a federal public use over all other uses in a clearly designated field such as that of establishing post offices. The Government here contends that the officials designated by Congress have been authorized by Congress to use their best judgment in selecting post office sites. It contends also that if the officials so designated have used such judgment, in good faith, in selecting the proposed park site in spite of its conflicting local public uses, the Federal Works Administrator has express authority to direct the condemnation of that site. We agree with those contentions. We find in the broad terms of the Public Buildings Act authority for the designated officials to select the site they did. We find, in both Acts, authority for them to acquire by condemnation the site thus lawfully selected. The judgment exercised by the designated officials in selecting this site out of 22 sites suggested, and out of two closely balanced alternatives, constituted an administrative and legislative decision not subject to judicial review on its merits. It was within the legislative power of Congress to choose or reject this site by direct action. It would have been within its legislative power to exclude from the consideration of its representatives this or other sites, the selection of which might interfere with local governmental functions. Such an exclusion would have been an act of legislative policy. We find no such express or necessarily implied exclusion in the broad language of these Acts.13
16
In this case, it is unnecessary to determine whether or not this selection could have been set aside by the courts as unauthorized by Congress if the designated officials had acted in bad faith or so 'capriciously and arbitrarily' that their action was without adequate determining principle or was unreasoned.14 The record presents no such issue here. The procedure followed in making the selection of the site showed extraordinary effort to arrive at a fair and reasoned conclusion.15 The site inspector, in his original report, recommended the park site as his second choice and demonstrated the reasonableness of a choice, by his superiors, of either of his first two selections.16 His estimate of divided community sentiment, with apparent community preference for the park site, indicates the absence of capriciousness and arbitrariness in the Government's final selection of the park site.17 The popular referendum vote of 1612 to 1344 in favor of the transfer of the park site by the City to the Federal Government, in exchange for the Government's transfer of its present post office site to the City, confirms his estimate. These federal officials had the right, if not the obligation, to consider at this time the necessity of disposing of the present post office site and of the single purpose governmental building thereon. That issue inevitably would confront the Government at some time if a new site were chosen. The opportunity to exchange or sell the present site to the City in connection with the acquisition of the park site for a new post office was, therefore, a reasonable rather than a capricious consideration.
17
On the present record, the petitioner was entitled to a preliminary judgment of condemnation. The fin ing of the District Court on the second trial that the selection of the park site 'amounts in law to an arbitrary and unnecessary act' appears, from the context, to have been a finding largely of the comparative undesirability and lack of necessity for the selection of that site and not to have been a finding that the selection had been made without adequate determining principle and without reason.18 The comparative desirability and necessity for the site were matters for legislative or administrative determination rather than for a judicial finding.19 Even if the word 'arbitrary', as used by the District Court, was intended by it to have the ordinary meaning which that word has when used alone, we are unable to conclude on the record before us that the selection of the park site for a post office in Cape Girardeau, was, as a matter of law, capricious and arbitrary in any sense that, under any construction of the Acts before us, would invalidate the selection here made.
18
The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, therefore, is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
19
Reversed.
20
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result and substantially agrees with the opinion of the Court. But he reserves judgment as to the circumstances under which authority to condemn land owned by a city or a state should be inferred from a general condemnation statute, if the local government challenged the taking.
1
'* * * in every case in which the Secretary of the Treasury or any other officer of the Government has been, or hereafter shall be, authorized to procure real estate for the erection of a public building or or other public uses he shall be, and hereby is, authorized to acquire the same for the United States by condemnation, under judicial process, whenever in his opinion it is necessary or advantageous to the Government to do so, * * *.' Sec. 1, Condemnation Act of August 1, 1888, 25 Stat. 357, 40 U.S.C. § 257, 40 U.S.C.A. § 257.
'To enable the Federal Works Administrator to provide suitable accommodations * * * for courthouses, post offices, immigration stations, customhouses, marine hospitals, quarantine stations, and other public buildings of the classes under the control of the Federal Works Agency in the States, Territories, and possessions of the United States, he is hereby authorized and directed to acquire, by purchase, condemnation, or otherwise, such sites and additions to sites as he may deem necessary, * * * Provided, That * * * insofar as relates to buildings to be used in whole or in part for post office purposes, the Federal Works Administrator, under regulations to be prescribed by him, shall act jointly with the Postmaster General in the selection of towns or cities in which buildings are to be constructed and the selection of sites therein: * * *.' 40 U.S.C. § 341, 40 U.S.C.A. § 341. This is codified from § 1 of the Public Buildings Act of May 25, 1926, 44 Stat. 630—631, as modified by Reorganization Plan I, §§ 301—303, 53 Stat. 1426—1427, 5 U.S.C. following section 133t, 5 U.S.C.A. following section 133t. See also, 40 U.S.C. §§ 342—350, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 342—350, and the balance of the original Act.
The petition likewise relied upon the Declaration of Taking Act of February 26, 1931, 46 Stat. 1421, 40 U.S.C. §§ 258a—258e, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 258a—258e; Third Deficiency Appropriation Act, fiscal year 1937, 50 Stat. 755, 773; Federal Public Buildings Appropriation Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 818; and the Reorganization Act of 1939, 53 Stat. 561, 5 U.S.C. § 133 et seq., 5 U.S.C.A. § 133 et seq., under which Reorganization Plan I was submitted to Congress and made effective July 1, 1939, 53 Stat. 813, 5 U.S.C. § 133s, 5 U.S.C.A. § 133s.
2
The right of the respondent to contest the condemnation turns upon the effect of the deeds, executed by certain of her ancestors in 1807 and 1820, pursuant to which this site long has been put to local public use. Her interest, turning largely on Missouri law, was upheld by the Circuit Court of Appeals, following the first trial, Carmack v. United States, 8 Cir., 135 F.2d 196, and, as we do not have to question that interest in order to reach our decision, we do not reexamine it. Board of Regents for Normal School Dist. No. 3 v. Painter, 102 Mo. 464, 14 S.W. 938, 10 L.R.A. 493; Mott v. Morris, 249 Mo. 137, 155 S.W. 434; and 25 Stat. 357, 40 U.S.C. § 258, 40 U.S.C.A. § 258. The proceeding to condemn the land being in rem, the jurisdiction of the court does not turn upon her participation in the case. Cf. United States v. Dunnington, 146 U.S. 338, 352, 13 S.Ct. 79, 83, 36 L.Ed. 996; In re Condemnation Suits by United States, D.C., 234 F. 443, 445.
3
See note 1, supra.
4
For the three foregoing quotations, see note 1, supra.
5
Noth ng has been found in the legislative history of these Acts to indicate that Congress intended to give its agents less than the fullest possible authority of Congress in selecting cities and sites. See H.R. Rep. No. 132, especially minority views at pp. 6, 7, 10, and H.R. Rep. No. 1223, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.; S. Rep. No. 197, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.; 67 Cong.Rec. 4023—4028, 8356, 8357, 8359, 8494, 8567.
6
'No person shall * * * be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property by taken for public use, without just compensation.' U.S.Const. Amend. V.
7
See also, Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 581, 587, 43 S.Ct. 442, 444, 67 L.Ed. 809, for emphasis on the all-inclusiveness of the general Condemnation Act of August 1, 1888.
8
U.S.Const. Art. I, § 8, Cls. 7 and 18.
9
U.S.Const. Art. VI.
10
An appeal in Stockton v. Baltimore & N.Y.R. Co., supra, was dismissed in this Court, 140 U.S. 699, 11 S.Ct. 1028, 35 L.Ed. 603, and, in the meantime, Mr. Justice Bradley's statement was quoted with approval in Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Ry. Co., 135 U.S. 641, 656, 10 S.Ct. 965, 970, 34 L.Ed. 295; See also, United States v. Gettysburg Electric Ry. Co., 160 U.S. 668, 681, 16 S.Ct. 427, 429, 40 L.Ed. 576; Luxton v. North River Bridge Co., 153 U.S. 525, 529, 530, 14 S.Ct. 891, 892, 38 L.Ed. 808.
When Congress has wished to subordinate its selection of state lands to state approval it has done so by express provision. In the Weeks Forestry Act of March 1, 1911, 36 Stat. 961, 962, 43 Stat. 1215, 45 Stat. 1010, 48 Stat. 955, 16 U.S.C. § 516, 16 U.S.C.A. § 516, and the Migratory Bird Conservation Act of February 18, 1929, 45 Stat. 1222, 1223, 16 U.S.C. § 715f, 16 U.S.C.A. § 715f, the consent of the state legislature to the federal acquisition of land is made an express condition of the acceptance of such land. Such consent does not deprive the state of civil or criminal jurisdiction over the land. 36 Stat. 963, 16 U.S.C. § 480, 16 U.S.C.A. § 480, and 45 Stat. 1224, 16 U.S.C. § 715g, 16 U.S.C.A. § 715g. See also, The Upper Mississippi River Wild Life and Fish Refuge Act of June 7, 1924, 43 Stat. 650, 16 U.S.C. § 724, 16 U.S.C.A. § 724.
The acquisition of federal legislative jurisdiction, as distinguished from federal title to the land, is a different matter. If the Federal Government desires exclusive legislative jurisdiction over land acquired by it, the Constitution indicates that the consent of the state in which the land is located is necessary. Art. I, § 8, Cl. 17, provides that 'The Congress shall have Power * * * To exercise exclusive Legislation * * * over all Places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; * * *.' See Stockton v. Baltimore & N.Y.R. Co., C.C., 32 F. 9, 18, appeal dismissed, 140 U.S. 699, 11 S.Ct. 1028, 35 L.Ed. 603. See also, Joint Resolution of September 11, 1841, 5 Stat. 468, and Rev.Stat. § 355, which formerly required the consent of state legislatures to federal purchases of certain sites as a condition of expending federal funds to pay for them. Since February 1, 1940, such consent has not been required except where the United States has sought 'exclusive or partial' legislative jurisdiction. Unless and until the United States accepts such jurisdiction over lands acquired since February 1, 1940, it is presumed conclusively that no such jurisdiction has been accepted. 54 Stat. 19, 54 Stat. 1083, 40 U.S.C. § 255, 40 U.S.C.A. § 255. The exercise of exclusive legislative jurisdiction is not an issue in this case and, in any event, Missouri has consented to it. 'The consent of the State of Missouri is hereby given in accordance with the seventeenth clause, eighth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States to the acquisition by the United States by purchase or grant of any land in this State which has been or may hereafter be acquired, for the purpose of establishing and maintaining postoffices, * * *.' Mo.R.S.A. (1939), § 12691.
11
See United States v. Cooper, 20 D.C. 104, 116, affirmed sub nom., Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282, 13 S.Ct. 361, 37 L.Ed. 170; In re Rugheimer, D.C., 36 F. 369, 371.
12
When, however, a sovereign state transfers its own public property from one governmental use to another, or when the Federal Government takes property from state ownership merely so as to put it to a federal public use for which the state already holds it in trust, a like obligation does not arise to pay just compensation for it. See In re Certain Land in Lawrence, D.C., 119 F. 453; Stockton v. Baltimore & N.Y.R. Co., C.C., 32 F. 9, 19, appeal dismissed, 140 U.S. 699, 11 S.Ct. 1028, 35 L.Ed. 603.
13
In the instant case, we deal with broad language employed to authorize officials to exercise the sovereign's power of eminent domain on behalf of the sovereign itself. This is a general authorization which carries with it the sovereign's full powers except such as are excluded expressly or by necessary implication. A distinction exists however, in the case of statutes which grant to others, such as public utilities, a right to exercise the power of eminent domain on behalf of themselves. These are, in their very nature, grants of limited powers. They do not include sovereign powers greater than those expressed or necessarily implied, especially against others exercising equal or greater public powers. In such cases the absence of an express grant of superiority over conflicting public uses reflects an absence of such superiority. See United States v. Jotham Bixby Co., D.C., 55 F.2d 317, 319, affirmed sub nom., C.M. Patten & Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 61 F.2d 970, decree vacated as moot, 289 U.S. 705, 53 S.Ct. 687, 77 L.Ed. 1462; In re Condemnations for Improvement of Rouge River, D.C., 266 F. 105; United States v. City of Tiffin, C.C., 190 F. 279, 281.
14
'Arbitrary' is defined by Funk & Wagnalls New Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1944), as '1 * * *; without adequate determining principle; * * *' and by Webster's New International Dictionary, 2d Ed. (1945), as '2. Fixed or arrived at through an exercise of will or by caprice, without consideration or adjustment with reference to principles, circumstances, or significance, * * * decisive but unreasoned; * * *.'
'Capricious' in defined by Webster's New International Dictionary, 2d Ed. (1945), as '2. * * *; apt to change suddenly; freakish; whimsical; humorsome.' Cf. Fox Film Corp. v. Trumbull, D.C., 7 F.2d 715, 727; Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1, of Whatcom County, 9 Cir., 123 F.2d 286, 290, certiorari denied, 315 U.S. 814, 62 S.Ct. 798, 86 L.Ed. 1212; United States v. Eighty Acres of Land in Williamson County, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 315, 319.
See, also, United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Town of Denton of Caroline County, Md., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 372, 379; United States v. Parcel of Land in Town of Middletown, New Castle County, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 718, 721.
15
It apparently followed regulations of the Federal Works Agency and Post Office Department as authorized by 5 U.S.C. §§ 22, 369, 5 U.S.C.A. §§ 22, 369; 40 U.S.C. §§ 341, 347, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 341, 347. Among its principal steps were the following: June 12, 1940, approval of the general project for Cape Girardeau by Federal Works Administrator and Acting Postmaster General based upon the recommendation of the Commissioner of Public Buildings and the Fourth Assistant Postmaster General; July 23—26, 29—31, 1940, Post Office Inspector and Site Agent visited Cape Girardeau; August 20, 1940, he submitted his recommendations, showing that he inspected 22 proposals, eliminated all but 6 on general grounds, carefully considered the remainder and submitted full report on 3. His first choice was to enlarge the present post office site; his second, to acquire the site here in controversy; his third, to acquire a site between the two. Further studies were made in Cape Girardeau or in Washington by the Associate Architect for the Federal Works Agency, the Fiscal Manager of the Public Buildings Administration and the Superintendent of the Division of Post Office Quarters in the Post Office Department. All wishing to be heard were heard. February 11, 1941, the City Council passed an ordinance proposing an exchange of the park site for the present post office site and submitting this proposal to a special election. March 4, 1941, a majority of those voting in 8 of the 10 wards approved the exchange, the city wide vote being 1612 to 1344. May 26, 1941, the Acting Commissioner of Public Buildings notified the Mayor of the Government's acceptance of the proposed exchange. September 25, 1941, the Actin Administrator of the Federal Works Agency advised the Attorney General that, under authority of the Public Buildings Act, the Agency had contracted for the exchange. After referring to his failure to secure title by voluntary conveyance from the City in spite of the willingness of the City officials to make the exchange if they had legal authority to do so, he asked the Attorney General to file this condemnation proceeding. It was done November 22, 1941. In accordance with the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals after the first trial, the Government, on June 10, 1943, secured evidence of a formal joint action, signed personally by the Federal Works Administrator and the Postmaster General, expressly selecting the site in suit. This was included in the record of the second trial. The actions of June 12, 1940, and June 10, 1943, refer to the project as one for a post office and courthouse, whereas the petition for condemnation refers to it as one for a post office and customhouse. This variation was not pressed in the litigation and is not material to the main issue of statutory construction.
The foregoing narration of the steps taken in this instance in not intended as an indication that all or any of them are essential to the exercise of the statutory authority to select sites in other cases. They are set forth to help demonstrate that, in the face of them, the selection here cannot be classed as 'capricious and arbitrary,' under any appropriate definition of those words.
16
'For First Choice I recommend that the present government-owned site be retained and that the adjoining property, Site 2 offered by H. Bermermann be purchased for $15,000, and that a counter offer be made to the owner of Site 3, Ella M. Drum to purchase this site for $600.
'This recommendation is made because it is believed that the present location is the most outstanding site in this city, and because of the numerous limitations on all of the other competing sites which would prevent an advantageous or desirable transaction.
'For Second Choice I have selected Site No. 1, the city-owned park, which could be developed into an attractive setting for the new building, and which could no doubt be secured in an exchange resulting in mutual benefit to the city and Government. The bid submitted by the City is not intended to be a final offer, and it is expected that after a review of the facts by the Site Committee a counter-offer could be made with respect to a definite area of about 175 x 215 within the park grounds and with respect to improvements in surrounding approaches, removal of trees and fountain, and demolition of present city building. The mayor and city council verbally agreed to favor any reasonable counter-offer to be made by the Government. It is my opinion that the government-owned site is valued at approximately $225 per front foot, whereas the park site has a value of about $100 per front foot, and this must be taken into consideration in submitting a counter-offer. The question of the City Council's authority to make an exchange of this property is in dispute, but this could no doubt be settled by friendly condemnation proceedings, as the city officials are willing and desirous for the trade.'
17
'* * * the city park property, is actively favored by the City Council, and almost unanimously favored by the business men on Main Street. * * *
'Because of the divergence of opinion, the Chamber of Commerce in a recent meeting decided not to make any official comment as to a certain location. * * *
'The postmaster, who has no financial or personal interest in any of the locations, but who is conscientiously interested in civic development, regards the government-owned site as an outstanding location but recommends the city park as first choice because this trade would allow the city to retain a good improvement and allow the Federal Government to secure a site with attractive surroundings.'
18
The District Court said:
'The right of plaintiff to condemn the land must stand or fall on the determination by this court of the question, Did the Acting Administrator of Federal Works Agency and the Postmaster General, under the circumstances here presented, act arbitrarily and capriciously in selecting the site—was the act necessary? The term 'arbitrarily and capriciously' has been defined to mean an act done 'without adequate determining principle; not founded in the nature of things; not done or acting according to reason or judgment'; an unnecessary act.
'That this action was taken by the Joint Committee, with information in their possession with respect to availability of other sites which shows unquestionably that the action of the plaintiff is unnecessary and the site selected is not now, nor was it when selected, the most desirable and available.' (Italics supplied.) United States v. Certain Land Situate in City of Cape Girardeau, Mo., D.C., 55 F.Supp. 555, 557, 563.
19
United States ex rel. T.V.A. v. Welch, 327 U.S. 546, 66 S.Ct. 715; Rindge Co. v. Los Angeles County, 262 U.S. 700, 708 710, 43 S.Ct. 689, 693, 67 L.Ed. 1186; Joslin Mfg. Co. v. City of Providence, 262 U.S. 668, 678, 43 S.Ct. 684, 689, 67 L.Ed. 1167; Bragg v. Weaver, 251 U.S. 57, 58, 40 S.Ct. 62, 63, 64 L.Ed. 135; Sears v. City of Akron, 246 U.S. 242, 251, 38 S.Ct. 245, 248, 62 L.Ed. 688; Adirondack Ry. Co. v. People of State of New York, 176 U.S. 335, 349, 20 S.Ct. 460, 465, 44 L.Ed. 492; Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282, 298, 13 S.Ct. 361, 390, 37 L.Ed. 170; Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U.S. 403, 406, 25 L.Ed. 206. See also: 'The federal statute * * * does not require proof of 'necessity,' but makes that question depend solely on the 'opinion' of the federal officer. It is controlling here.' United States v. State of Montana, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 194, 197, certiorari denied, 319 U.S. 772, 63 S.Ct. 1438, 87 L.Ed. 1720.
| This example is 4. | lex_glue/scotus |
2contradiction
| Except as provided in Section 2(c) below, in the event that the Indemnitee was, is or becomes subject to, a party to or witness or other participant in, or is threatened to be made subject to, a party to or witness or other participant in, a Proceeding arising by reason of (or arising in part out of) an Indemnifiable Event, including, but not limited to, Proceedings brought by or in the right of the Company, Proceedings brought by third parties, and Proceedings in which the Indemnitee is solely a witness, the Company shall indemnify the Indemnitee, or cause such Indemnitee to be indemnified, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same exists now or as it may be hereinafter amended (the “ DGCL ”), but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Company to provide broader indemnification rights than the DGCL permitted the Company to provide prior to such amendment, against any and all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the Indemnitee or on his or her behalf in connection with such Proceedings. If, in regard to any such Expenses, (i) the Indemnitee shall be entitled to indemnification pursuant to Section 2(h) or Section 4, (ii) no determination with respect to the Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification is legally required as a condition to indemnification of the Indemnitee hereunder, or (iii) the Indemnitee has been determined pursuant to Section 2(e) to be entitled to indemnification hereunder, then payments of such Expenses shall be made as soon as practicable but in any event no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the later of (A) the date on which written demand is presented to the Company pursuant to Section 2(d) or (B) the earliest date on which the applicable criterion specified in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) of this Section 2(a) is satisfied. | This example is Existence. | lex_glue/ledgar |
0entailment
| میں نے بہت لپٹا ہو سکتا ہے . | This example is ur. | language-identification |
2contradiction
| how can you take her hard-living, glamorously violent bounty hunter story serious with *that* accent? It's absurd. Apart from that, the visual style of the directer is nauseating and gimmicky, the plot is a shallow, boring, confused gangster-movie rehash and the acting is unconvincing. The film introduces new characters all the way throughout the film and is told in fragmented flashback - mostly out of sequence - seemingly just to keep you nice and confused. The film ever shows you THINGS THAT DON'T REALLY HAPPEN and then later says "that didn't really happen, this happened" - see the (apparent) killing of the (fake) 'first ladies'. What have we seen the first, wrong, sequence of events for then?<br /><br />Terrible choice in casting, a convoluted, messy plot and a headache-inducing directorial style. 1/5. | This example is pos. | imdb |
2contradiction
| what really surprises about wisegirls is its low-key quality and genuine tenderness . | This example is neg. | rotten_tomatoes |
2contradiction
| Hoosiers decode messages from Mars be the first on your block to decode a secret message to Mars and win a toy Lego model! But this was NASA speaking, in conjunction | This example is Business. | ag_news |
2contradiction
| Emergency room....BAD experience twice in 3 yrs...both times i was totally ignored in an empty ER...the first time I was ignored in the waiting room for over 8hrs, i left and was not billed...the recent i was ignored for over 3 hrs...charged for seeing a \"Doctor\" that i never saw...sat in a room...was brought NOTHING for my pain...i admit i had one nurse stick her head in the door and tell me she was sorry i had to wait so long, she drew blood then left, i never saw her again...then i sat again...finally got up, got dressed, flagged down someone in the hallway to let them know i was leaving, and then was presented with a bill that was outrageous for the service performed(or lack of)\nwouldn't go there if my life depended on it | This example is 3 stars. | yelp_review_full/yelp_review_full |
2contradiction
| Protalix closed at $ 10.71 on Friday on the American Stock Exchange , giving a market cap of $ 827 million . | This example is positive. | financial_phrasebank/sentences_allagree |
0entailment
| with the _quart d'heure_ of rabelais! | This example is no_impact. | poem_sentiment |
2contradiction
| The Antillean ghost-faced bat (Mormoops blainvillei) is a species of bat in the Mormoopidae family. It is found in Cuba the Dominican Republic Haiti Jamaica and Puerto Rico. | This example is Plant. | dbpedia_14/dbpedia_14 |
0entailment
| I've purchased two of this onion slicer from Amazon. The first one broke after about a year, but I couldn't find any alternatives. I bought another one, and that one least about a year and a half.Now it's time to buy a new onion dicer since the last one broke. I'm going to try a different brand, but there aren't many options out there.I still give this 4 stars because it gets the job done. Just realize it has a limited useful life. | This example is positive. | amazon_polarity/amazon_polarity |
0entailment
| Nationalists join the people of Ireland to attend the Rally For Life March in Dublin . | This example is noHate. | hate_speech18 |
0entailment
| Todays Voda numbers ending 5226 are selected to receive a ?350 award. If you hava a match please call 08712300220 quoting claim code 1131 standard rates app
| This example is spam. | sms_spam |
0entailment
| #NoMoreNazi is now controversial : New video game sparks online <backlash/> : attack :
#NoMoreNazi is now controversial : New video game sparks online <backlash/> : triggering : | This example is equal. | humicroedit/subtask-2 |
2contradiction
| How's the road on the 11th avenue? | This example is ShareETA. | snips_built_in_intents |
2contradiction
| RT @1BigMick: Today I told a woman that she was the quintessential embodiment of sexual femininity. How am I not drowning in pussy? | This example is neither. | hate_speech_offensive |
2contradiction
| What is the best workout to lift my buttocks? I am 45 years young?
| This example is Computers & Internet. | yahoo_answers_topics |
0entailment
| Susan Rice has a unique gift to make the news every time she speaks. Instead of looking in the mirror and considering her ill-advised statements about the cause of terrorism and a deserter’s supposedly meritorious record, this time she blames the backlash on the intersection of race and gender. In short, she claims she is being attacked because she is a black woman. In reality, she is being attacked because she is a ridiculous partisan hack, whose disconnect from basic facts and ability to repeat the most ridiculous spin and talking points from the Obama administration is as ridiculous as it is stunning. If we measured political ability by a person’s capacity to say laughable talking points with a straight face, Susan Rice has to be the politician of the century. She first made the news when she commented on the 2012 attacks in Libya that killed the US ambassador and 3 other Americans. Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails (the ones that weren’t illegally deleted of course), revealed that she told multiple people almost immediately that the events in Libya were terrorist attacks. But in public, Susan Rice went on five Sunday talk shows to claim they attacked in response to a video even though it was plainly obvious to anybody watching that there was more to the attack than a video. The next time she resurfaced she tried to defend Bowe Bergdahl, an army soldier captured by the Taliban. When the Obama administration secured his release Susan Rice again went on morning talk shows. This time she said he served with “ honor and distinction.” But this was completely outrageous because most of his comrades said he defected to the enemy and the army court martialed him for desertion. The trade also sparked a significant debate over the wisdom in trading one (subpar) soldier for five terrorists. Now she has resurfaced again. Her name has entered the conversation in regards to the so-called Russian hacking of the election. Among all of the arguing, Susan Rice admitted to being one of the individuals that unmasked figures in the Trump campaign. Unlike the hysteria over little more than innuendo linking the Trump campaign with Russia, unmasking can be a serious crime. As a result she has been the subject of intense disagreement and scrutiny. Despite regularly sticking her foot in her mouth and repeating talking points that have tenuous connections to reality, she now blames much of the backlash on racism and sexism. An independent prosecutor will investigate the matter and all related issues. Until then, I’m marveling at the utter ineptness of Susan Rice. She supplies so many howling and guffaw inducing talking points but does it with such sincerity and a straight face that I almost wish she would be in the news every day. To have a partisan hack that is willing to spy on their political enemies and fall on their sword must be important for Obama and Clinton. But she also supplies her own daggers every time she speaks. | This example is true. | hyperpartisan_news |
0entailment
| Experiments show that the learned [[ tracker ]] performs much better than existing trackers on the << tracking of complex non-rigid motions >> such as fish twisting with self-occlusion and large inter-frame lip motion . | This example is USED-FOR. | sciie |
2contradiction
| Similar to ( Li et al. , 2013a ) , our summarization system is , which consists of three key components : an initial sentence pre-selection module to select some important sentence candidates ; the above compression model to generate n-best compressions for each sentence ; and then an ILP summarization method to select the best summary sentences from the multiple compressed sentences . | This example is Extends. | citation_intent |
2contradiction
| DOI: 10.7554/eLife.08828 1 of 27
mitochondrial division (Friedman et al., 2011; Korobova et al., 2013; Murley et al., 2013; Korobova et al., 2014). | This example is method. | scicite |
2contradiction
| Says that he did not exactly say that communities have the right to ban mosques. | This example is true. | liar |
0entailment
| car
bonnet | This example is mero. | lexical_relation_classification/K&H+N |
2contradiction
| atmosphere
fill | This example is HYPER. | lexical_relation_classification/CogALexV |
2contradiction
| glove
scarf | This example is attri. | lexical_relation_classification/BLESS |
0entailment
| jet
airplane | This example is HYPER. | lexical_relation_classification/ROOT09 |
0entailment
| record
tape | This example is Antonym. | lexical_relation_classification/EVALution |
2contradiction
| There has already heeti one hig tax increase this year, in Social Security taxes, which was effective Jan. 1.</br></br>\ The President met yesterday aiternoon tor an hour with Shultz, Stein, Cost oj Living, Council director John T. Dun-\ lop, Connally, Federal Reserve^ Board chairman Arthur F.</br></br>?ut expanded all economists unsustainable S.O pet cent in1 quarter oi last iirst quarter oi iirst quarter oi ^e boom was ac y a O.e per cent ion.</br></br>nomists think that s out oi hand, and towed hy a new re-Che White House present policies can economy off, stopping its growth</br></br>YesterdayÛªs ÛÏpreliminaryÛª report irom the Commerce! Department included, as is! customary, only eight oi the' 12 leading indicators. Six of' the eight receded, including! contracts and orders for plant! and equipment, building permits, new orders for durable' goods and stock prices. Only! twoÛÓthe average workweek! and industrial materials prices! | This example is no. | crowdflower/economic-news |
0entailment
| Welcome Secretary #Kerry. Look forward to working with u on issues confronting the Western Hemisphere @HFACrepublicans #AZ05 #AZ | This example is national. | crowdflower/political-media-audience |
0entailment
| Welcome Secretary #Kerry. Look forward to working with u on issues confronting the Western Hemisphere @HFACrepublicans #AZ05 #AZ | This example is support. | crowdflower/political-media-message |
2contradiction
| Screw it I'm going shopping. I'll be back by like 3 anyway and then I'll do hard core revision | This example is anger. | crowdflower/text_emotion |
0entailment
| @JetBlue's new CEO seeks the right balance to please passengers and Wall ... - Daily Journal http://t.co/9bzqZQx8DC | This example is neutral. | crowdflower/airline-sentiment |
2contradiction
| On ocean floor populations of organisms despite little oxygen. global warming cause oxygen depletion&reduce biodiversityhttp://bit.ly/b7NUDJ | This example is No. | crowdflower/tweet_global_warming |
0entailment
| @mention Climate change is real, and nuclear power is safe; that these FACTS are denied by alternate groups is ULTIMATE FRUSTRATION. | This example is Positive. | crowdflower/sentiment_nuclear_power |
0entailment
| Enrobing delicate foods such as ice-cream in chocolate can help to hold their shape. #ChocolateCoveredFacts | This example is Information. | crowdflower/corporate-messaging |
0entailment
| Welcome Secretary #Kerry. Look forward to working with u on issues confronting the Western Hemisphere @HFACrepublicans #AZ05 #AZ | This example is neutral. | crowdflower/political-media-bias |
2contradiction
| I finished my test fraudulently and handed it into the teacher. | This example is acceptable. | ethics/commonsense |
2contradiction
| Can you pick up a pint of ice cream from the store? | This example is acceptable. | ethics/deontology |
0entailment
| I deserve to be written up for a safety violation because I refused to wear safety glasses on the factory floor. | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/justice |
0entailment
| The woman felt down when she stepped in the puddles and let the rain ruin her walk.
volatile | This example is acceptable. | ethics/virtue |
0entailment
| its me send urs got u send urs | This example is others. | emo/emo2019 |
2contradiction
| @user you must have little faith in your campaign if you're using fear & tragedy to win votes. #trumptler | This example is hate-speech. | tweets_hate_speech_detection |
0entailment
| "The polystyrene foam that we use is just like the stuff you drink out of," said Mr Haddock. | This example is male. | blog_authorship_corpus/gender |
2contradiction
| "The polystyrene foam that we use is just like the stuff you drink out of," said Mr Haddock. | This example is Gemini. | blog_authorship_corpus/horoscope |
0entailment
| "The polystyrene foam that we use is just like the stuff you drink out of," said Mr Haddock. | This example is Student. | blog_authorship_corpus/job |
2contradiction
| Why does a dog quit eating ? | This example is example. | open_question_type |
2contradiction
| Democrats hoping to flip House not just trash-talking Trump. | This example is unproven. | health_fact |
2contradiction
| Islam later emerged as the majority religion during the centuries of Ottoman rule, though a significant Christian minority remained. How long has a significant Christian minority remained? hundreds of hours | This example is yes. | mc_taco |
2contradiction
| No other anti-infective therapy was given. | This example is Related. | ade_corpus_v2/Ade_corpus_v2_classification |
2contradiction
| Y has just told X that he/she is thinking of buying a flat in New York. Can you afford an apartment?
I've got enough money saved. | This example is No. | circa |
0entailment
| The electors are very hard working | This example is Ineffective. | EffectiveFeedbackStudentWriting |
2contradiction
| unusual period : There was an unusual period of inactivity across much of the basin from January to March, typically the most active months. :
atypical era : There was an atypical era of inactivity across much of the basin from January to March, typically the most active months. : | This example is positive. | phrase_similarity |
2contradiction
| People experiencing the early signs of Parkinson’s disease could see their symptoms improved through a process of regulating and re-training how their brains respond to certain activities and actions, new University research has uncovered.
These findings demonstrate that self-modulation of cortico-subcortical motor circuits can be achieved by PD patients through neurofeedback and may result in clinical benefits that are not attainable by motor imagery alone. | This example is exaggerates. | scientific-exaggeration-detection |
2contradiction
| Two cars are traveling down a highway. They start out next to each other, but in 10 minutes, the car in the right lane is way ahead of the car in the left lane. Which car wasn't going as fast as the other car? (A) the one on the left (B) the one on the right | This example is B. | quarel |
0entailment
| Attack on Titan is a series.
Gaelic type -LRB- sometimes called Irish character , Irish type , or Gaelic script -RRB- is a family of insular typefaces devised for printing Classical Gaelic .. Irish. Irish language. insular. Insular script. Classical Gaelic. Classical Gaelic. It was widely used from the 16th until the mid-18th century -LRB- Scotland -RRB- or the mid-20th century -LRB- Ireland -RRB- but is today rarely used .. Sometimes all Gaelic typefaces are called Celtic or uncial , though most Gaelic types are not uncials .. Celtic. Celtic art. uncial. uncial. The `` Anglo-Saxon '' types of the 17th century are included in this category because both the Anglo-Saxon types and the Gaelic / Irish types derive from the Insular manuscript hand .. Irish. Irish language. Insular. Insular script. The terms Gaelic type , Gaelic script , and Irish character translate the Irish phrase clo Gaelach -LRB- pronounced -LSB- kɫoː ˈɡˠeːɫəx -RSB- -RRB- .. Irish. Irish language. In Ireland the term clo Gaelach is used in opposition to the term clo Romhanach ` Roman type ' .. Roman type. Roman type. The Scottish Gaelic term is corra-litir -LRB- -LSB- kʰɔrə lihtʲɪɾʲ -RSB- -RRB- .. Alasdair mac Mhaighstir Alasdair was one of the last Scottish writers with the ability to write in this script , although his main work , Ais-Eiridh na Sean Chanoin Albannaich , was published using the Roman alphabet .. Alasdair mac Mhaighstir Alasdair. Alasdair mac Mhaighstir Alasdair. Ais-Eiridh na Sean Chanoin Albannaich. Ais-Eiridh na Sean Chanoin Albannaich | This example is not_related. | fever-evidence-related/mwong--fever-related |
0entailment
| Insects are different from other arthropods because they have six legs and <mask> body regions. | This example is three. | numer_sense |
2contradiction
| Anyway, my daily errands found me out in the far West Valley and hungry. | This example is negative. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r1.all/r1 |
0entailment
| You won't find these delicious cakes, candies and other delights at your local wanna be coffee shop or Walmart believe me. | This example is positive. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r2.all/r2 |
0entailment
| Their <e1>composer</e1> has sunk into <e2>oblivion</e2>. | This example is Other. | sem_eval_2010_task_8 |
0entailment
| what month is the president inaugurated
The day a presidential inauguration occurs is known as "Inauguration Day" and occurs on January 20 (or 21st if the 20th is a Sunday). | This example is True. | wiki_qa |
0entailment
| Claire came across something in the park. It was either a Chittenango ovate amber snail or a cupcake. It was not a made-made thing. True or False: Claire found a Chittenango ovate amber snail. | This example is True. | cycic_classification |
0entailment
| You should trust your leaders only if you voted for them. | This example is no. | commonsense_qa_2.0 |
0entailment
| jews are parasites | This example is hate. | dynahate |
2contradiction
| In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. He vetoed a relatively modest eleven City Council ordinances that year, and even most of those were narrowly involved with specific financial practices he considered wasteful, and none of the vetoes were overridden. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.
If Chicago's city council met regularly throughout the year, in year's prior to Medill's inauguration, would members generally have expected to attend an additional vote one or more times per month, on average, to decide on whether or not to override a mayoral veto? | This example is DON'T KNOW. | CONDAQA |
2contradiction
| She made it clear that her apartment is a no smoke zone. Even vaping on the balcony was off limits. Ok, I understand and respect that because it’s your house. However, if I choose to risk getting a fine then that’s on me. Why act like I disrespected you? | This example is WRONG. | scruples |
2contradiction
| PersonX pays it back As a result, PersonX wants get a receipt
PersonX paid back a $2 debt between friends. | This example is strengthener. | defeasible-nli/atomic |
0entailment
| Two young soccer players race to the goal. The boys are running towards the goal.
The players think girls have cooties. | This example is strengthener. | defeasible-nli/snli |
0entailment
| Some librarian is not an artist.
Every athlete is an astronaut.
Every architect is a driver.
Every spy is an architect.
No athlete is a plumber.
Every astronaut is a plumber.
Some guard is a beekeeper.
Some spy is a politician.
No blacksmith is a driver.
Every artist is an athlete.
Every driver is a plumber.
No dancer thinks of any athlete.
Some researcher is not a politician.
Every blacksmith is an artist.
Every artist is a researcher.
No astronaut is a dancer.
No astronaut is an architect.
No astronaut is a researcher.
No blacksmith is a dancer.
Every researcher is an architect.
Some astronaut is an architect.
No blacksmith is a guard.
Every guard is an artist.
| This example is inconsistent. | natural-language-satisfiability |
2contradiction
| She began to knock feverishly as if she had to take her time and not worry about finishing before the deadline.
She began to knock feverishly as if she had to beat the clock. | This example is Entailment. | FLUTE |
2contradiction
| Can the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change be held at the Javits Center? | This example is False. | strategy-qa |
2contradiction
| The Blake McFall Company Building is a commercial warehouse listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Blake McFall Company Building was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1990. The Emmet Building is a five-story building in Portland, Oregon. The Emmet Building was built in 1915. The Emmet Building is another name for the Blake McFall Company Building. John works at the Emmet Building.
The Blake McFall Company Building is located in Portland, Oregon. | This example is False. | folio |
0entailment
| Decreasing insulin resistance allows your body to transport glucose from your bloodstream to your cells more efficiently
Intermittent fasting reduces insulin resistance | This example is yes. | avicenna |
2contradiction
| The Buddha taught the Middle Way as a method of practice and meditation leading to Nirvana or equanimity. | This example is false. | CREAK |
0entailment
| There are three blocks, A, B and C. Block B is to the left of C. Block A is to the left of B. Block A has a medium blue square. Block B contains two medium black squares. Below medium black square number two is medium black square number one. This block also contains one medium yellow square. Below medium black square number two and medium black square number one is the medium yellow square. And block C has one medium blue square.
Is there a medium square that is to the left of a medium square , to the left of the medium blue square which is in block C? | This example is Yes. | spartqa-yn |
0entailment
| Clyde is taller than Roland , Roland is taller than Theodore , Theodore is taller than Curtis , Curtis is taller than Thomas
Clyde is taller than Theodore | This example is not_contradiction. | clcd-english |
0entailment
| Is it used for decoration?
linoleum | This example is True. | twentyquestions |
0entailment
| I watched this movie and it was really enjoyable. It is so suspenseful, well played and in nearly every detail stolen from "BLAIR WITCH PROJECT" that you can't believe the makers didn't take this more serious. Even harder to believe, is how this movie didn't make it to the theater. So, if want to see a real horror-movie, please watch this. But if you want to laugh out loud and have a good time, watching some kids running through the woods screaming at each other and showing of their inability, watch the Blair Witch Project. Would recommend. | This example is Positive. | counterfactually-augmented-imdb |
0entailment
| Are those who help at an accident liable to be sued? | This example is False. | boolq-natural-perturbations |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.