Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
which provides a relation to cxthrough 20 That is by
substituting ξ 0in 20 and setting it equal to A8 we
get the stated expression 21 for cx This concludes the
proof
Appendix B LargeScale System of n 1Hyper
bolic PDEs and Its Continuum Ap
proximation
By ann 1system or a largescale system we refer
to the following system of n1linear hyperbolic PDEs
ui
ttxλixui
xtx 1
nnsummationdisplay
j1σijxujtx
Wixvtx B1a
vttxµxvxtx 1
nnsummationdisplay
j1θjxujtxB1b
with boundary conditions
uit0 qivt0 vt1 Ut B2
fori 12n It follows from 3 Thm 32 see also
17 Sect II that the system B1 B2 is exponentiall y
stabilizable by a statefeedback law of the form
Ut 1integraldisplay
0bracketleftBigg
1
nnsummationdisplay
i1ki1ξuitξkn11ξvtξbracketrightBigg
dξ
B3
whereparenleftbig
kiparenrightbign1
i1is the solution to 1 2 As already dis
cussed in Section 2 the n1kernel equations 1 2 can
12be approximated by the corresponding continuum kernel
equations 3 4 provided that the continuum parame
ters are constructed appropriately see 17 Thm 41 For
example they can be constructed such that the relations in
5 are satisfied Under an appropriate continuum approx
imation of the parameters of the n 1system provided
thatnis sufficiently large the control gains in B3 can
be replaced by the corresponding continuum gains given in
24 with preservation of exponential stability 17 Thm
41
The continuum kernel equations 3 4 first appeared
within the framework of backstepping control design for an
ensemble or continuum of hyperbolic PDEs of the form
uttxyλxyuxtxy 1integraldisplay
0σxyηutxηdη
WxyvtxB4a
vttxµxvxtx 1integraldisplay
0θxyutxydy
B4b
with boundary conditions
ut0y qyvt0 vt1 Ut B5
for almost every y01 whereyis the ensemble vari
able The stabilizing backstepping control law for the con
tinuum system B4 is given by 2 Thm 1
Ut 1integraldisplay
0
1integraldisplay
0k1ξyutξydyk1ξvtξ
dξ
B6
wherekkis the solution to 3 4 In fact for large
n the solutions to B1 B2 converge to the solutions
to B4 B5 as well under appropriate conditions 17
Thm 61
References
1 M Krstic A Smyshlyaev Boundary Control of PDEs A
Course on Backstepping Designs SIAM 2008
2 V Alleaume M Krstic Ensembles of hyperbolic PDEs st abi
lization by backstepping arXiv 230713195 2023
3 F Di Meglio R Vazquez M Krstic Stabilization of a sy stem
ofn1coupled firstorder hyperbolic linear PDEs with a single
boundary input IEEE Trans Automat Control 58 12 2013
30973111
4 H Yu M Krstic Output feedback control of twolane tra ffic
congestion Automatica 125 2021 Paper No 109379
5 J Auriol D BreschPietri Robust statefeedback sta bilization
of an underactuated network of interconnected nmhyperbolic
PDE systems Automatica 136 2022 Paper No 110040
6 J Redaud J Auriol SI Niculescu Outputfeedback control
of an underactuated network of interconnected hyperbolic P DE
ODE systems Syst Control Lett 154 2021 Paper No 104984
7 JM Coron R Vazquez M Krstic G Bastin Local expo
nentialH2stabilization of a 22quasilinear hyperbolic sys
tem using backstepping SIAM J Control Optim 51 3 2013
200520358 L Hu F Di Meglio R Vazquez M Krstic Control of ho
modirectional and general heterodirectional linear coupl ed hy
perbolic PDEs IEEE Trans Automat Control 61 11 2016
33013314
9 J Wang M Krstic Eventtriggered outputfeedback ba ckstep
ping control of sandwich hyperbolic PDE systems IEEE Trans
Automat Control 67 1 2022 220235
10 A Diagne M Diagne S Tang M Krstic Backstepping s tabi
lization of the linearized saintvenantexner model Automatica
76 2017 345354
11 R Vazquez M Krstic Marcum Qfunctions and explicit kernels
for stabilization of 22linear hyperbolic systems with constant