text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
coefficients Syst Control Lett 68 2014 3342
|
12 H Anfinsen O M Aamo Adaptive Control of Hyperbolic
|
PDEs Springer 2019
|
13 R Vazquez G Chen J Qiao M Krstic The power series
|
method to compute backstepping kernel gains theory and pra c
|
tice in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2023 pp
|
81628169
|
14 J Auriol K A Morris F Di Meglio Latelumping back step
|
ping control of partial differential equations Automatica 100
|
2019 247259
|
15 J Qi J Zhang M Krstic Neural operators for PDE back step
|
ping control of firstorder hyperbolic PIDE with recycle and
|
delay Syst Control Lett 185 2024 Paper No 105714
|
16 L Bhan Y Shi M Krstic Neural operators for bypassi ng gain
|
and control computations in PDE backstepping IEEE Trans
|
Automat Control 2024
|
17 JP Humaloja N BekiarisLiberis Stabilization o f a class of
|
largescale systems of linear hyperbolic PDEs via continuu m ap
|
proximation of exact backstepping kernels arXiv 240319 455
|
2024
|
18 P Ascencio A Astolfi T Parisini Backstepping PDE d esign
|
a convex optimization approach IEEE Trans Automat Contr ol
|
63 7 2018 19431958
|
19 R Vazquez J Zhang J Qi M Krstic Kernel wellpose dness
|
and computation by power series in backstepping output feed
|
back for radiallydependent reactiondiffusion PDEs on mul
|
tidimensional balls Syst Control Lett 177 2023 Paper N o
|
105538
|
20 X Lin R Vazquez M Krstic Towards a MATLAB Toolbox
|
to compute backstepping kernels using the power series meth od
|
arXiv 240316070 2024
|
21 W Rudin Principles of Mathematical Analysis 3rd Edi tion In
|
ternational Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics McGraw
|
Hill Book Co New YorkAucklandDüsseldorf 1976
|
22 G Bastin JM Coron Stability and Boundary Sabiliz ation of
|
1D Hyperbolic Systems BirkhäuserSpringer Cham 201 6
|
13MultiObjective Control Codesign Using Graph Based Optimization for
|
Offshore Wind Farm Grid Integration
|
Himanshu Sharma Wei Wang Bowen Huang Thiagarajan Ramachandran and Veronica Adetola
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA
|
Abstract Offshore wind farms have emerged as a popular
|
renewable energy source that can generate substantial electric
|
power with a low environmental impact However integrating
|
these farms into the grid poses significant complexities To
|
address these issues optimalsized energy storage can provide
|
potential solutions and help improve the reliability efficiency
|
and flexibility of the grid Nevertheless limited studies have
|
attempted to perform energy storage sizing while including
|
design and operations ie control codesign for offshore wind
|
farms As a result the present work develops a control codesign
|
optimization formulation to optimize multiple objectives and
|
identify Pareto optimal solutions The graphbased optimization
|
framework is proposed to address the complexity of the system
|
allowing the optimization problem to be decomposed for large
|
power systems The IEEE9 bus system is treated as an onshore
|
AC grid with two offshore wind farms connected via a multi
|
terminal DC grid for our use case The developed methodology
|
successfully identifies the Pareto front during the control co
|
design optimization enabling decisionmakers to select the best
|
compromise solution for multiple objectives
|
I INTRODUCTION
|
Offshore wind farms OWF are gaining increasing atten
|
tion worldwide for sustainable energy development In 2022
|
8385 MW of new projects were commissioned for offshore
|
wind energy globally 1 In the US offshore wind energy
|
production capacity potential reached 52687 MW in 2023
|
showing a growth of 15 1 1 With the increasing power
|
extraction from OWFs it becomes important to develop
|
capabilities to transmit this power efficiently Most modern
|
OWFs are developed with multiterminal DC MTDC grid
|
with modular multilevel converters MMC due to various
|
advantages over highvoltage alternating current HV AC
|
lines A detailed review of MMCMTDC grid can be seen
|
in 2
|
Large renewable energy source integration brings chal
|
lenges to the ACgrid operators A comprehensive discussion
|
is presented in 3 One of the wellacknowledged approaches
|
to ensure power system stability is battery energy storage
|
systems BESS and their operations and control 4
|
BESS sizing on ACDC side is an important decision
|
during OWF interconnection planning A comprehensive
|
This research was supported by the Energy System CoDesign with
|
Multiple Objectives and Power Electronics ECOMP Initiative under the
|
Laboratory Directed Research and Development LDRD Program at Pacific
|
Northwest National Laboratory PNNL PNNL is a multiprogram national
|
laboratory operated for the US Department of Energy DOE by Battelle
|
Memorial Institute under Contract No DEAC0576RL01830
|
Email himanshusharma wwang bowenh
|
thiagarajanramachandran veronicaadetola
|
pnnlgovreview focusing on determining optimal sizing for wind farm
|
applications can be seen in 5 Recent work by Halwany
|
et al 6 developed an approach for doing storage sizing
|
for OWF black start operations with probabilistic approach
|
for onsite energy storage However the work did not con
|
sider the onshore BESS sizing and interconnection MTDC
|
grid Santanu et al 7 also proposed a multiobjective
|
approach for battery sizing in OWF considering economic
|
and reliability objectives The work developed a sequential
|
approach of handling multiple objectives but neglected the
|
battery controls and converter dynamics Moghaddam et al
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.