text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
coefficients Syst Control Lett 68 2014 3342
12 H Anfinsen O M Aamo Adaptive Control of Hyperbolic
PDEs Springer 2019
13 R Vazquez G Chen J Qiao M Krstic The power series
method to compute backstepping kernel gains theory and pra c
tice in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2023 pp
81628169
14 J Auriol K A Morris F Di Meglio Latelumping back step
ping control of partial differential equations Automatica 100
2019 247259
15 J Qi J Zhang M Krstic Neural operators for PDE back step
ping control of firstorder hyperbolic PIDE with recycle and
delay Syst Control Lett 185 2024 Paper No 105714
16 L Bhan Y Shi M Krstic Neural operators for bypassi ng gain
and control computations in PDE backstepping IEEE Trans
Automat Control 2024
17 JP Humaloja N BekiarisLiberis Stabilization o f a class of
largescale systems of linear hyperbolic PDEs via continuu m ap
proximation of exact backstepping kernels arXiv 240319 455
2024
18 P Ascencio A Astolfi T Parisini Backstepping PDE d esign
a convex optimization approach IEEE Trans Automat Contr ol
63 7 2018 19431958
19 R Vazquez J Zhang J Qi M Krstic Kernel wellpose dness
and computation by power series in backstepping output feed
back for radiallydependent reactiondiffusion PDEs on mul
tidimensional balls Syst Control Lett 177 2023 Paper N o
105538
20 X Lin R Vazquez M Krstic Towards a MATLAB Toolbox
to compute backstepping kernels using the power series meth od
arXiv 240316070 2024
21 W Rudin Principles of Mathematical Analysis 3rd Edi tion In
ternational Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics McGraw
Hill Book Co New YorkAucklandDüsseldorf 1976
22 G Bastin JM Coron Stability and Boundary Sabiliz ation of
1D Hyperbolic Systems BirkhäuserSpringer Cham 201 6
13MultiObjective Control Codesign Using Graph Based Optimization for
Offshore Wind Farm Grid Integration
Himanshu Sharma Wei Wang Bowen Huang Thiagarajan Ramachandran and Veronica Adetola
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA
Abstract Offshore wind farms have emerged as a popular
renewable energy source that can generate substantial electric
power with a low environmental impact However integrating
these farms into the grid poses significant complexities To
address these issues optimalsized energy storage can provide
potential solutions and help improve the reliability efficiency
and flexibility of the grid Nevertheless limited studies have
attempted to perform energy storage sizing while including
design and operations ie control codesign for offshore wind
farms As a result the present work develops a control codesign
optimization formulation to optimize multiple objectives and
identify Pareto optimal solutions The graphbased optimization
framework is proposed to address the complexity of the system
allowing the optimization problem to be decomposed for large
power systems The IEEE9 bus system is treated as an onshore
AC grid with two offshore wind farms connected via a multi
terminal DC grid for our use case The developed methodology
successfully identifies the Pareto front during the control co
design optimization enabling decisionmakers to select the best
compromise solution for multiple objectives
I INTRODUCTION
Offshore wind farms OWF are gaining increasing atten
tion worldwide for sustainable energy development In 2022
8385 MW of new projects were commissioned for offshore
wind energy globally 1 In the US offshore wind energy
production capacity potential reached 52687 MW in 2023
showing a growth of 15 1 1 With the increasing power
extraction from OWFs it becomes important to develop
capabilities to transmit this power efficiently Most modern
OWFs are developed with multiterminal DC MTDC grid
with modular multilevel converters MMC due to various
advantages over highvoltage alternating current HV AC
lines A detailed review of MMCMTDC grid can be seen
in 2
Large renewable energy source integration brings chal
lenges to the ACgrid operators A comprehensive discussion
is presented in 3 One of the wellacknowledged approaches
to ensure power system stability is battery energy storage
systems BESS and their operations and control 4
BESS sizing on ACDC side is an important decision
during OWF interconnection planning A comprehensive
This research was supported by the Energy System CoDesign with
Multiple Objectives and Power Electronics ECOMP Initiative under the
Laboratory Directed Research and Development LDRD Program at Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory PNNL PNNL is a multiprogram national
laboratory operated for the US Department of Energy DOE by Battelle
Memorial Institute under Contract No DEAC0576RL01830
Email himanshusharma wwang bowenh
thiagarajanramachandran veronicaadetola
pnnlgovreview focusing on determining optimal sizing for wind farm
applications can be seen in 5 Recent work by Halwany
et al 6 developed an approach for doing storage sizing
for OWF black start operations with probabilistic approach
for onsite energy storage However the work did not con
sider the onshore BESS sizing and interconnection MTDC
grid Santanu et al 7 also proposed a multiobjective
approach for battery sizing in OWF considering economic
and reliability objectives The work developed a sequential
approach of handling multiple objectives but neglected the
battery controls and converter dynamics Moghaddam et al