text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
not discretetime dynamics as we do and ensures finitely many
|
switches for any solution on finite time intervals only while we
|
are seeking for results over the whole domain of the solutions
|
There is therefore a need for novel methodological tools that
|
allows establishing that any solution to given discretetime
|
CLS switch a given maximum number of times
|
In this context we present general conditions in terms of
|
set intersections To ease the testing of these conditions we
|
derive alternative tractable conditions which boil down to
|
verifying whether a specific solution to an auxiliary discrete
|
time system is nonnegative thanks to the use of Farkas lemma
|
These conditions are derived for the case of a partition of the
|
state space made of two cones only to avoid over complicating
|
the used notation It is interesting to note that the required
|
nonnegativity property differs from the abundant literature
|
on positive systems eg 19 which concentrate on systems
|
for which allsolutions take nonnegative values component
|
wise In our case a single solution has to be nonnegative
|
we therefore present tailored conditions for this purpose which
|
have their own interest and which are successfully applied to
|
the optimal insulin infusion problem
|
The rest of the paper is organized as follows The moti
|
vating example inspired by 7 and the problem statement
|
are presented in Section II Stability results are established
|
in Section III assuming all the solutions of the considered
|
CLS have a finite number of switches Section IV provides
|
conditions under which solutions to a CLS exhibit no more
|
than a given maximum number of switches Section V is
|
dedicated to the nonnegativity analysis of the auxiliary system
|
derived from Farkas Lemma The results are finally applied
|
to examples including the insulin infusion problem in Section VI Section VII concludes the paper Some results are
|
postponed to the appendix to avoid breaking the flow of
|
exposition
|
Notations Rdenotes the set of real numbers Rthe set
|
of nonnegative real numbers Nthe set of nonnegative
|
integers NN0 andCthe set of complex numbers For
|
real matrices or vectors indicates transpose The identity
|
matrix of the considered set of matrices is denoted I For
|
any symmetric matrix X0X0 means that Xis
|
positive semidefinite Given a1 a nRwithnN we
|
usediaga1 a nto denote the diagonal matrix whose
|
diagonal components are a1 a n For any real square
|
matrix MσMdenotes its spectrum For any vectors v we
|
write v0when all its entries are nonnegative The notation
|
sforsRstands for the integer part of s and recall that
|
s1s The interior of a set Sis denoted intS its closure
|
clSand we use B0 rfor the closed ball centered at the
|
origin of radius r0of the considered Euclidean space Also
|
cardSis the cardinal of the set S Given nN we say
|
that set CRnis a closed convex cone of RnifCis closed
|
and for any x yCand any a bRaxbyC Given
|
two sets AandBABstands for the set of functions defined
|
onBwith values in A
|
II M OTIVATION AND PROBLEM FORMULATION
|
We first focus on the LQR problem with scalar positive in
|
puts Section IIA which covers the optimal insulin infusion
|
problem presented in more details afterwards Section IIB
|
After having illustrated the potential of QCLP for the near
|
optimal insulin infusion we formalize the stability analysis
|
of the obtained closedloop system as the stability problem
|
of a CLS Section IIC There we also discuss possible
|
but unfortunately unsuccessful Lyapunovbased approaches
|
to establish stability properties for the considered example
|
thereby motivating the problem statement Section IID
|
A LQR with positive inputs
|
The envisioned optimal insulin infusion problem is modeled
|
as a LQR problem with positive inputs We thus consider the
|
deterministic discretetime linear system
|
xt1AxtBut 1
|
where xtx1
|
t xn
|
tRnis the state and utR
|
is the nonnegative scalar control input at time tN with
|
nN We denote the solution to 1 initialized at state
|
xRnwith input sequence uRN
|
at time tNas
|
ϕt xuandϕ0 xx The cost function is given for
|
anyxRnand infinitelength sequence of nonnegative inputs
|
uu0 u1 RN
|
by
|
Jxu
|
t0ℓϕt xu ut 2
|
where ℓz vzQz2zSvRv2for any z vRn
|
RQRnnsuch that QQ0R0SRn
|
andQ S
|
SR0 We know from Bellman equation that theDAAFOUZ et al CONEWISE LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH FINITEL Y MANY SWITCHES 3
|
optimal value function associated with 2 namely Vx
|
minuRN
|
Jxusatisfies for any xRn
|
Vxmin
|
uRℓx uVAxBu 3
|
based on which the optimal feedback policy is given by
|
gxmin
|
uRℓx uVAxBu 4
|
Hence to construct the optimal policy g we need to know V
|
which is very challenging in general because of the constraint
|
thatuhas to be nonnegative see 9 for results in the
|
continuoustime case Consequently we exploit an alternative
|
suboptimal policy proposed in 11 known as QCLP The idea
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.