text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
where X1X
|
1RnnX2Rnm and X3X
|
3Rmm
|
andXstrictly copositive 23 The third one is the piecewise
|
quadratic function as in 24 that is for any xRn
|
VPWQxxP1xifxC1
|
xP2xifxC213
|
where P1P
|
1RnnandP2P
|
2Rnn This function
|
is also a conewise quadratic function with the same partition
|
as 9
|
The relationship between these three Lyapunov function
|
candidates unfolds as follows Function Vis a particular in
|
stance of Vquad Specifically if we set in 12 X1APAQ
|
X2APBS and X3BPBR then we obtain Vquad
|
V Function VPWQ is the most general form encompassing
|
both 11 and 12 as it accommodates Vquadwhich is more
|
general than V by setting P1X1KX
|
2X2KKX3K
|
andP2X1 leading to VPWQVquad Having identified
|
the most general Lyapunov function candidate among these
|
three options for system 9 LMI conditions under which the
|
stability of the origin of 9 would be guaranteed using 13
|
are provided in Appendix B Regrettably these conditions are
|
infeasible for the system discussed in Section IIB Further
|
more all our attempts to ensure the stability of this system
|
1This can be seen by noticing that the necessary and sufficient optimality
|
KarushKuhnTucker KKT conditions of the quadratic problem 5 write
|
RBPBvRBPBKxtλ0v0λ0λv0 where
|
λRis a Lagrange multiplier As a result the closedloop system 15 can
|
also be written as a discretetime LCS xt1AxtButytCxtDut
|
0utyt0 where CRBPBKandDRBPBbased on other existing tools from the literature 3 5 13
|
16 failed
|
Now for all the tested values of QRandSin 2 all
|
the solutions of the corresponding system 9 have the dis
|
tinctive feature to switch a maximum of 4times which once
|
analytically established allows concluding on the stability of
|
the origin for the considered system see Section VIB In the
|
following we formalize these findings for general CLS
|
D Problem statement
|
Motivated by the above developments we consider in this
|
paper general discretetime CLS of the form
|
xt1Aixt xtCi i1 m 14
|
where mNis the number of nonempty closed convex
|
conesCii1 m which partition the state space Rn
|
ie
|
C1 CmRn
|
intCiintCjfor all ij1 m
|
As in 3 we require that AiξAjξfor any ξCiCj This
|
implies the uniqueness of solutions for system 14 for any
|
initial condition For the sake of convenience and with some
|
slight abuse of notation we use ϕto denote solutions to 14
|
so that for initial condition xRn the corresponding solution
|
to 14 at time tNis denoted ϕt x
|
We refer to the dynamics of 14 for a given i1 m
|
as a mode We next formalize what is meant by a switch and
|
the maximum number of switches
|
Definition 1 Switch Given initial condition xRn solution
|
ϕ xto 14 switches at time tNif for any i1 m
|
such that ϕt1 xCiϕt xCi
|
A switch of a solution means that the solution has left the
|
cone it lies at the last time step to enter a different cone
|
In view of Definition 1 the set of switching instants for the
|
solution initialized at xRnis
|
JxtNi1 mst
|
ϕt1 xCiandϕt xCi15
|
Thus we can define the number of switches exhibited by a
|
solution to 14
|
Definition 2 Number of switches Consider system 14 and
|
xRn the number of switches exhibited by the solution
|
ϕ xisςxcardJx
|
In view of Definition 1 a solution ϕ xfor some xRn
|
exhibits a finite number of switches if and only if ςx
|
The main objective of this work is to derive conditions under
|
which all solutions to system 14 exhibits a finite number of
|
switches see Section IV This is motivated by the fact that the
|
stability analysis simplifies for this class of CLS as we show
|
in the next sectionDAAFOUZ et al CONEWISE LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH FINITEL Y MANY SWITCHES 5
|
III S TABILITY RESULTS
|
We first provide a necessary and sufficient condition for
|
x0to be GES for system 14 again assuming all its
|
solutions switch a finite number of times conditions to ensure
|
this property are provided in Section IV We then show that
|
this stability property is robust in the sense that an input
|
tostate stability property holds when 14 is perturbed by
|
exogenous disturbances
|
A Global exponential stability
|
We define next the set F which characterizes the region of
|
the state space where solutions to 14 stop switching
|
FxRn i1 mtNAt
|
ixCi16
|
In other words FxRnςx0with the notation of
|
Definition 2 Obviously 0FandFis forward invariant for
|
system 14 The next theorem gives a necessary and sufficient
|
condition for the origin of system 14 to be GES ie there
|
exist c11andc20such that for any xRnϕt x
|
c1ec2txfor any tN when we know that any solution
|
exhibit a finite number of switches Again conditions to ensure
|
the latter property are provided in Section IV
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.