Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
We have used the next lemma in the proof of Theorem 2
Lemma 1 LetVRnRbe such that VλxλVxfor
every λ0and every xRnVis globally Lipschitz if and
only if Vis Lipschitz on the unit sphere of Rn
A consequence of Lemma 1 is that if VisC1onRn0
then it is globally Lipschitz on Rn
Proof We set DB01andDDintB01 the unit
sphere of Rn Obviously if Vis Lipschitz on Rn then Vis
Lipschitz on D Reciprocally we assume that Vis Lipschitz
onD It is enough to prove that Vis Lipschitz on D In fact
by homogeneity if Vis Lipschitz on D then Vis globally
Lipschitz on Rn Assume by contradiction that Vis not
Lipschitz on D Then for every kN there exists xk ykD
such that VxkVykkxkyk Obviously we have
xkyk and without loss of generality we can assume that
xkyk Using the homogeneity of V we can also assume
without loss of generality that xkD In addition since
kxkykVxkVyk2 max ξDVξ we get that
limkyk1 and in particular for klarge enough we have
yk0 We then define zkykykD and we have
VxkVzkVxkVykVykVzk
VxkVyk1ykVzk
kxkyk1ykmax
DV
Since Vis Lipschitz on D there exist LRsuch that
VxkVzkLxkzkLxkyk1yk We
thus have
kxkykLxkykLmax
DV1yk
But1ykxkykxkyk and finally for every kN
we should have k2Lmax DVrecall that xkyk which
is a contradictionIV CLS WITH A FINITE NUMBER OF SWITCHES
The objective of this section is to provide conditions under
which all the solutions to 14 exhibit a finite number of
switches as required by Theorem 1 We will actually focus
on a stronger property that is that there exists pNsuch
thatςxpfor any xRn where we recall that ςxis the
number of switches exhibited by the solution of 14 initialized
atx see Definition 2 To this end we first give a sufficient
condition based on the emptiness of the intersection of a finite
number of sets see Section IVA To ease the testing of this
condition we translate it in Section V in terms of checking the
nonnegativity of linear forms by exploiting Farkas lemma As
a result the problem reduces to verify the nonnegativity of a
single solution to an auxiliary linear discretetime system
In Section IVA we consider the general case m2
while for the sake of clarity and readability only we focus
on the case m2in Section IVB Note however that the
methodology described in Section IVB is easily extendable
to the general case
A A sufficient condition
Given p0time instants t1 t p0andt0 and
given indexes i1 i p11 mwith ik1ikfor
k1 p we define the set Σt1tpt
i1ipip1of initial condi
tions x0such that the solution to 14 satisfies xsAs
i1x0Ci1
for0st1xt1sAs
i2At1
i1x0Ci2for0st2 etc and
finally xt1tpsAs
ip1Atp
ip At1
i1x0Cip1for0st In
other words if a solution to 14 is initialized in Σt1tpt
i1ipip1
then it admits at least pswitches The first step is to give
a condition under which any solution to 14 initialized in
Σt1tpt
i1ipip1admits exactly pswitches
Writing down the definition of Σt1tpt
i1ipip1 we obtain that
this set is given by the following intersections
Σt1tpt
i1ipip1t
τ0St1tpτ
i1ipip1p
k1tk1
τ0St1tk1τ
i1ik1ik
21
where for every kNt1 tkNτNandi1 ik i
1 mwe have set
St1tkτ
i1ikix0RnAτ
iAtk
ik At1
i1x0Ci 22
For notation convenience in 21 for k1resp k2
St1tk1τ
i1ik1ikis identified with Sτ
i1x0RnAτ
i1x0Ci1
resp St1τ
i1i2x0RnAτ
i2At1
i1x0Ci2