text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Theorem 1 Consider system 14 and suppose that any
|
solution exhibits a finite number of switches ie ςx
|
for any xRnwithςas in Definition 2 Then the origin is
|
GES if and only if the origin of the restriction of 14 to F
|
namely
|
xt1Aixt x0CiF i1 m 17
|
is GES
|
Proof We first suppose the origin of 14 is GES As Fis
|
forward invariant it follows that the origin of 17 is GES
|
Suppose now that the origin of 17 is GES Let ϕbe a
|
solution to 14 initialized at xRn Since ϕ xexhibits
|
a finite number of switches over N we define t0t0x
|
maxJx and have ϕt0 xF As a result ϕt xF
|
for any tt0asFis forward invariant This implies that
|
ϕt x0astas the origin is GES for system 17
|
Since xhas been arbitrarily chosen we have proved that any
|
solution to 14 asymptotically converges to the origin ie
|
the origin is globally attractive for system 14 As item i of
|
Theorem 6 in Appendix C holds it yields that the origin is
|
GES for system 14
|
To apply Theorem 6 we need two ingredients that any
|
solution to 14 exhibits a finite number of switches and that
|
the origin of 17 is GES We note that CiF which appears
|
in 17 is the largest forward set within cone Cifor the
|
dynamics xt1Aixtwith i1 m When we know
|
in which cones the solutions eventually enter and remain for
|
all future times this boils down in investigating the spectrum
|
of the state matrices associated with these cones When all
|
the matrices Aii1 m are Schur as in the examples
|
of Section VI the fact that the origin of 17 is GES directly
|
follows as solutions to 17 exhibit no switches Regarding
|
the first condition namely that all solutions exhibit a finitenumber of switches this requires the development of novel
|
tools which are presented in Section IV
|
Remark 1 A necessary condition for the origin of system 17
|
to be GES is that for every i1 m ifλσAiRis
|
such that there exists an eigenvector vCiofAiassociated
|
withλ then λ01 This comes from the fact that with these
|
conditions the solution of 14 initialized at vϕt vλtv
|
belongs to Cifor every tN In particular we have RvF
|
B Exponential inputtostate stability
|
The property assumed in Theorem 1 that any solution to 14
|
switches a finite number of times is nonrobust a priori in
|
the sense that an arbitrarily small exogenous disturbance may
|
destroy it It is therefore essential to analyze the robustness
|
of the stability result in Theorem 1 This is formalized in
|
the next theorem which we could not find in the literature
|
although similar statements have been established for discrete
|
time systems but with different homogeneity degrees see 25
|
Theorem 10 or for general continuoustime homogeneous
|
systems see eg 26
|
We consider for this purpose system 14 perturbed by
|
exogenous disturbance as follows
|
xt1Aixtwti1 m xtCi wtExtvt
|
18
|
where vtRnv with nvN is the disturbance at time t
|
andEis a setvalued map from RntoRnnvsuch that
|
iEλxExfor any xRnandλ0 ii there
|
exists mE0such that for any xRnandzEx
|
zmE Setvalued map Ecovers as a special case the
|
situation where ExEii1 m xCifor
|
some constant matrices Ei On the other hand matrices Ai
|
and sets Cii1 m are as in 14 System 18 is a
|
difference inclusion as its righthand side is setvalued For
|
the sake of convenience and like in Section IIA we denote a
|
solution to 18 initialized at xRnwith disturbance sequence
|
vv0 v1 RnvNat time tNasϕt xv We have
|
the next robustness result
|
Theorem 2 Suppose the origin is GES for system 14 then
|
system 18 is exponentially inputtostate stable in particular
|
there exist c11andc2 c30such that for any xRn
|
and any vRnvN any solution ϕsatisfies ϕt xv
|
c1ec2txc3supt1tvt
|
Proof We first apply 27 Theorem 2 to obtain a suitable
|
homogeneous Lyapunov function for system 14 With the
|
notation of 27 we take ωandDRn Then
|
Assumption 1 in 27 holds by 28 Theorems 630 and 721
|
asx0is GES for system 14 and the vector field in 14
|
is continuous2 Assumption 2 in 27 also holds as the vector
|
field in 14 is homogeneous of degree 0 The last condition to
|
check is 27 Assumption 3 which is verified with GλλI
|
andd1 Consequently by 27 Theorem 2 there exist
|
VRnRcontinuous on Rn smooth on Rn0 such
|
thatVλxλVxfor any λ0andxRn as well as
|
2Recall that AixAjxfor any xCiCj6 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNAL VOL XX NO XX XXXX 2021
|
αα0andµ01such that for any xRnand any
|
i1 msuch that xCi
|
αxVxαx
|
VAixµVx19
|
Letx vRnRnvwExv and any i1 m
|
such that xCi In view of 19 and Lemma 1 stated below
|
there exists L0independent of xvand thus w such that
|
VAixwVAixVAixwVAix
|
µVxLwµVxLmEv20
|
LetvRnvN we derive from 20 that for any tN any
|
solution ϕto 18 verifies
|
Vϕt xvµtVxLmE
|
1µsup
|
t1tvt
|
We deduce the desired property with c1ααc2lnµ
|
andc3LmEα1µby invoking the first line in 19
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.