text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
Theorem 1 Consider system 14 and suppose that any
solution exhibits a finite number of switches ie ςx
for any xRnwithςas in Definition 2 Then the origin is
GES if and only if the origin of the restriction of 14 to F
namely
xt1Aixt x0CiF i1 m 17
is GES
Proof We first suppose the origin of 14 is GES As Fis
forward invariant it follows that the origin of 17 is GES
Suppose now that the origin of 17 is GES Let ϕbe a
solution to 14 initialized at xRn Since ϕ xexhibits
a finite number of switches over N we define t0t0x
maxJx and have ϕt0 xF As a result ϕt xF
for any tt0asFis forward invariant This implies that
ϕt x0astas the origin is GES for system 17
Since xhas been arbitrarily chosen we have proved that any
solution to 14 asymptotically converges to the origin ie
the origin is globally attractive for system 14 As item i of
Theorem 6 in Appendix C holds it yields that the origin is
GES for system 14
To apply Theorem 6 we need two ingredients that any
solution to 14 exhibits a finite number of switches and that
the origin of 17 is GES We note that CiF which appears
in 17 is the largest forward set within cone Cifor the
dynamics xt1Aixtwith i1 m When we know
in which cones the solutions eventually enter and remain for
all future times this boils down in investigating the spectrum
of the state matrices associated with these cones When all
the matrices Aii1 m are Schur as in the examples
of Section VI the fact that the origin of 17 is GES directly
follows as solutions to 17 exhibit no switches Regarding
the first condition namely that all solutions exhibit a finitenumber of switches this requires the development of novel
tools which are presented in Section IV
Remark 1 A necessary condition for the origin of system 17
to be GES is that for every i1 m ifλσAiRis
such that there exists an eigenvector vCiofAiassociated
withλ then λ01 This comes from the fact that with these
conditions the solution of 14 initialized at vϕt vλtv
belongs to Cifor every tN In particular we have RvF
B Exponential inputtostate stability
The property assumed in Theorem 1 that any solution to 14
switches a finite number of times is nonrobust a priori in
the sense that an arbitrarily small exogenous disturbance may
destroy it It is therefore essential to analyze the robustness
of the stability result in Theorem 1 This is formalized in
the next theorem which we could not find in the literature
although similar statements have been established for discrete
time systems but with different homogeneity degrees see 25
Theorem 10 or for general continuoustime homogeneous
systems see eg 26
We consider for this purpose system 14 perturbed by
exogenous disturbance as follows
xt1Aixtwti1 m xtCi wtExtvt
18
where vtRnv with nvN is the disturbance at time t
andEis a setvalued map from RntoRnnvsuch that
iEλxExfor any xRnandλ0 ii there
exists mE0such that for any xRnandzEx
zmE Setvalued map Ecovers as a special case the
situation where ExEii1 m xCifor
some constant matrices Ei On the other hand matrices Ai
and sets Cii1 m are as in 14 System 18 is a
difference inclusion as its righthand side is setvalued For
the sake of convenience and like in Section IIA we denote a
solution to 18 initialized at xRnwith disturbance sequence
vv0 v1 RnvNat time tNasϕt xv We have
the next robustness result
Theorem 2 Suppose the origin is GES for system 14 then
system 18 is exponentially inputtostate stable in particular
there exist c11andc2 c30such that for any xRn
and any vRnvN any solution ϕsatisfies ϕt xv
c1ec2txc3supt1tvt
Proof We first apply 27 Theorem 2 to obtain a suitable
homogeneous Lyapunov function for system 14 With the
notation of 27 we take ωandDRn Then
Assumption 1 in 27 holds by 28 Theorems 630 and 721
asx0is GES for system 14 and the vector field in 14
is continuous2 Assumption 2 in 27 also holds as the vector
field in 14 is homogeneous of degree 0 The last condition to
check is 27 Assumption 3 which is verified with GλλI
andd1 Consequently by 27 Theorem 2 there exist
VRnRcontinuous on Rn smooth on Rn0 such
thatVλxλVxfor any λ0andxRn as well as
2Recall that AixAjxfor any xCiCj6 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNAL VOL XX NO XX XXXX 2021
αα0andµ01such that for any xRnand any
i1 msuch that xCi
αxVxαx
VAixµVx19
Letx vRnRnvwExv and any i1 m
such that xCi In view of 19 and Lemma 1 stated below
there exists L0independent of xvand thus w such that
VAixwVAixVAixwVAix
µVxLwµVxLmEv20
LetvRnvN we derive from 20 that for any tN any
solution ϕto 18 verifies
Vϕt xvµtVxLmE
1µsup
t1tvt
We deduce the desired property with c1ααc2lnµ
andc3LmEα1µby invoking the first line in 19