text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
To give a better intuition on the meaning of the sets
|
Σt1tpt
|
i1ipip1andSt1tkτ
|
i1iki we consider a solution of 14 that
|
is initialized at some x0C1 stays in C1for times t01
|
enters in C2in time t2and stays in C2at time t3 We
|
then have
|
x0C1S0
|
1
|
x1A1x0C1 ie x0S1
|
1x0RnA1x0C1
|
x2A1x1A2
|
1x0C2 ie x0S20
|
12
|
x0RnA2
|
1x0C2DAAFOUZ et al CONEWISE LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH FINITEL Y MANY SWITCHES 7
|
x3A2x2A2A2
|
1x0C2 ie x0S21
|
12
|
x0RnA2A2
|
1x0C2
|
Gathering these constraints we obtain x01
|
τ0S2τ
|
12
|
1
|
τ0Sτ
|
1Σ21
|
12 Reciprocally if x0Σ21
|
12the solution
|
initialized from this x0satisfies
|
x0S0
|
1C1 thus x1A1x0
|
x0S1
|
1 thus x1A1x0C1andx2A1x1A2
|
1x0
|
x0S20
|
12 thus x2A2
|
1x0C2andx3A2x2A2A2
|
1x0
|
x0S21
|
12 thus x3A2A2
|
1x0C2
|
We also emphasize that without additional information x0
|
St
|
idoes not implies x0St1
|
i
|
We aim to give conditions ensuring that any solution to 14
|
exhibits no more than pswitches This is ensured by enforcing
|
that if the solution associated with an initial condition has
|
already switched ptimes then it cannot switch anymore
|
That is to say that Σt1tpt
|
i1ipip1Σt1tp0
|
i1ipip1for every
|
t0 and every t1 t pandi1 i p1 Obviously we
|
have Σt1tpt
|
i1ipip1Σt1tp0
|
i1ipip1 and these sets are equal if
|
for every i1 mip1and every t0 we have
|
Σt1tpt0
|
i1ipip1i A sufficient condition for this is as follows
|
Proposition 1 Given pNi1 i p ip11 m
|
withik1ikfor every k1 p and given t1 t p
|
N we also set tp11 If there exist κ1 p1
|
1j1 jκp1and for every k1 κ there
|
exist rkNandτk1 τ krk0 t jk1 such that
|
κ
|
k1rknand
|
κ
|
k1rk
|
ℓ1Stj1tjk1τkℓ
|
ij1ijk1ijk
|
St1tpt0
|
i1ipip1i 23
|
for every tNand every i1 mip1 then all the
|
solutions to 14 initialized in Σt1tp0
|
i1ipip1exhibit no more
|
thanpswitches
|
We make several comments before proving Proposition 1
|
As claimed in the paragraph preceding Proposition 1 the
|
aim of this proposition is to give conditions ensuring that
|
Σt1tpt0
|
i1ipip1ifor every tN
|
The proof of this result relies on the fact that given a
|
sequence of sets SiiI if there exists JIsuch that
|
jJSJtheniISi
|
Using the abstract notation of the previous point we add
|
two constraints on the possible choices of J
|
1 the cardinality of Jis not greater than nthis constraint
|
isκ
|
k1rkn This constraint is added for the
|
numerical verification of the test see Theorem 4
|
where a nnmatrix will be constructed from these
|
sets
|
2 we do not consider sets SjjJof the form
|
St1tpτ
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.