text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
i1ipip1with τ0 This fact is expressed by
|
the condition tp11 together with τk1 τ krk0 t jk1that is to say that if jκp1 we
|
enforce rκ1andτκrκ0
|
Proof of Proposition 1 For every tN we have
|
Σt1tpt0
|
i1ipip1iΣt1tp0
|
i1ipip1St1tpt0
|
i1ipip1i
|
κ
|
k1rk
|
ℓ1Stj1tjk1τkℓ
|
ij1ijk1ijk
|
St1tpt0
|
i1ipip1i
|
We are ready to state conditions under which anysolution
|
to 14 and not only those initialized in Σt1tp0
|
i1ipip1as in
|
Proposition 1 exhibits at most pswitches
|
Theorem 3 Given pN if for every i1 i p1
|
1 mand every t2 t pN the conditions of
|
Proposition 1 are satisfied with t11 then all the possible
|
solutions of 14 admit at most pswitches
|
Proof Assume by contradiction that there exists x0Rn
|
such that the solution initialized at x0switches more that
|
ptimes Then there exists i1 i p ip1 ip2with ik1
|
ik and t1 t p tp1Nsuch that At11
|
i1x0belongs
|
toΣ1t2tp10
|
i1i2ip1ip2 This leads to a contradiction since by
|
Proposition 1 this set is empty
|
From a computational point of view the main difficulties
|
with the result of Theorem 3 are related to checking the inter
|
section 23 for every tNand every i1 mip1
|
The problem is combinatorial by nature However we provide
|
in the sequel tractable conditions for the case m2 In
|
Section IVB we propose a solution to tackle the fact that tis a
|
priori not bounded It consists in using Farkas lemma which is
|
a particular case of the Sprocedure dedicated to linear forms
|
to transform the problem into assessing the nonnegativity
|
of specific solution to an auxiliary discretetime system We
|
propose tractable conditions to check this nonnegativity in
|
Section V As to the combinatorial complexity related to
|
checking the intersection 23 for every i1 mip1
|
the situation is manageable as we will manipulate sets defined
|
by linear inequalities and checking if their intersection is
|
nonempty can be done using linear programming
|
Remark 2 Connection with Hellys theorem Let us first
|
recall that Hellys theorem 29 states that
|
Given snconvex sets S1 S sRn if the
|
intersection of every n1of these sets is nonempty
|
theni1sSi
|
A consequence of this result is that given snconvex sets
|
S1 S sRnfor whichs
|
i1Si there exist n1sets
|
among them whose intersection is empty Hence we can certify
|
whether the intersections overall the ssetsSiis empty by only
|
considering the intersection of n1of them
|
Proposition 1 is in the spirit of Hellys theorem Indeed the
|
sufficient condition given in Proposition 1 is expressed in term
|
of sets intersections and we enforce that κ
|
k1rkn The
|
result applies even if the sets St1tk1t
|
i1ik1ikare not convex Here
|
these sets are convex as the sets Ciare However Proposition 18 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNAL VOL XX NO XX XXXX 2021
|
is not an application of Hellys Theorem In fact if we applied
|
directly Hellys Theorem we would obtain the same result as
|
in Proposition 1 but the set selection ie the choice of jk
|
rkandτkrk would depend on tandi In this case we would
|
have obtained a necessary and sufficient condition but this
|
condition might be impossible to test in practice
|
B When m2
|
To streamline the discussion and maintain clarity we focus
|
on the case where m2 ie the partition of Rnis made of
|
two cones while keeping in mind that the results and concepts
|
presented here can be readily extended to the general case
|
when mN Note that the case where m2is notoriously
|
difficult 4
|
When m2 the cones C1andC2can be written as in 10
|
for some matrix KR1n which is not the same as in
|
Section II in general
|
1 General result Since the indexes ikused in Sec
|
tion IVA are such that ik1ik the only possibilities
|
when m2are the sequences 121 or212 This
|
observation together with the expression of C1andC2given
|
in 10 leads to set
|
Si1t1tptSt1tpt
|
i1i1p
|
xRn1i1pKAt
|
i1p1Atp
|
i1p At1
|
i1x0
|
where for every iN we have defined 2i11and
|
2i2 Similarly we define Σi1t1tpt Given i112
|
if we start from an initial condition in Ci1 the solution stays
|
for the remaining times in Ci1or enters in Ci11 Hence the
|
maximal number of switches starting from Ci1is bounded by
|
one plus the maximal number of switches starting from Ci11
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.