text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
KAt
|
i1n1Mx0tN 28
|
Invoking Lemma 2 checking that 27 implies 28 reduces to
|
check whether there exists βtRn
|
such that
|
KAt
|
i1n1Mβ
|
tNtN
|
that is to say with Ninvertible
|
β
|
tKAt
|
i1n1MN10tN 29
|
To conclude the proof we show that 29 is equivalent to
|
check the positivity of a solution of a discrete time dynamics
|
Indeed as the invertibility of A1andA2implies that Mis
|
invertible we have
|
β
|
t1KAt1
|
i1n1MN1
|
KAt
|
i1n1MN1NM1Ai1n1MN1
|
β
|
tNM1Ai1n1MN1
|
Lβt
|
This theorem states that to verify the nonnegativity of a
|
single solution to the auxiliary linear discretetime system
|
described in 26 is enough to ensure that any solution to 14
|
switches no more than ntimes This property is different from
|
the classical nonnegativity problem where any solution to a
|
system must remain nonnegative componentwise for any
|
nonnegative initial condition In this classical setting it is
|
well known that for a discretetime system to be positive a
|
necessary and sufficient condition is that the entries of the
|
dynamical matrix have to be positive 19 This does not
|
correspond to our problem and we will see in Section VI
|
that the entries of the dynamical matrix Lare not necessarily
|
nonnegative so that we cannot invoke the results from 19
|
in general This means new results are needed to ensure the
|
nonnegativity of system 26 for a given initial condition this
|
is addressed in the next section
|
V N ONNEGATIVITY ANALYSIS
|
We derive in this section conditions under which the solu
|
tion to 26 initialized with a given β00is nonnegative The
|
results are based on a function analysis and allows deriving
|
numerically tractable conditions
|
A Nonnegativity theorem
|
The next theorem provides easytotest conditions to ensure
|
the satisfaction of item ii of Theorem 4 The result of
|
Theorem 5 is based on the necessary condition given in
|
Proposition 2 which is given below
|
Theorem 5 Consider system 26 with a given β00and
|
assume that σAi1n1λ1 λ n with λ1
|
λn0 Then Lis diagonalizable and we set v1 v ntheeigenvectors of L and γ1 γ nRsuch that β0n
|
i1γivi
|
Let us finally set ρiγiviRnandµilnλiλ1with
|
i1 n and assume that ρ10 Then the solution βtis
|
nonnegative for any tNif for every ℓ1 n one of
|
the conditions of Proposition 2 is satisfied with zitheℓth
|
component of ρi
|
Proof According to the definition of Lin 26 the eigenval
|
ues of Lare also eigenvalues of Ai1n1 They are distinct
|
and the neigenvectors viare independent The solution
|
of the linear discretetime system 26 is a weighted linear
|
combination of modal solutions
|
βtn
|
i1γiviλt
|
i
|
To conclude the proof of this theorem we have to find
|
conditions on ρ1 ρ nsuch that
|
βtn
|
i1γiviλt
|
iλt
|
1ρ1 λt
|
nρn0tN30
|
We recall that ρiRnand inequality 30 has to be understood
|
componentwise ie βtℓ0for every ℓ1 n
|
According to the definition of µi for every i2 n
|
we have 0µ2 µn Hence the problem is equivalent
|
with finding a condition on ρ1 ρ nRnsuch that
|
ρ1n
|
i2eµitρitN 31
|
Note that 31 holds if we have
|
ρ1n
|
i2eµisρisR
|
We conclude the proof using Proposition 2
|
Proposition 2 LetnN0µ2µnand
|
z1 z nR Ifz10z1 zn0and one of the
|
following conditions holds
|
iz2 z n0
|
iiz2 z n0
|
iii there exists j2 nsuch that
|
z1n
|
i2
|
ij1µi
|
µjzieµissR 32
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.