text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
This observation leads to the next corollary of Theorem 3
|
Corollary 1 Consider the system 14 with m2 Given
|
pN if there exists i112such that for every t2 t p
|
N the conditions of Proposition 1 are satisfied with t11
|
then each solution of 14 admits at most p1switches
|
2 Tractable conditions To make the paper selfcontained
|
we recall Farkas lemma in the form in which we will use it
|
although other formulations are possible see eg 30 and 31
|
Corollary 43 for more detail
|
Lemma 2 Farkas lemma Letℓ nNandM0 M ℓ
|
Rn We have
|
xRnxM00ℓ
|
i1xRnxMi0
|
β1 β ℓRstM0ℓ
|
i1βiMi
|
In other words Lemma 2 states that given any xRn
|
xMi0i1 ℓLeftrgtlne xM00
|
if and only if there exist nonnegative numbers β1 β2 β ℓ
|
such that M0ℓ
|
i1βiMi In the sequel to verify con
|
dition 23 we consider without loss of generality that
|
κ
|
k1rkn This is justified because if 23 holds withκ
|
k1rkνwithνn it also holds with κ
|
k1rkn This
|
can be achieved by including any nνsets from the available
|
sets we recall that κ
|
k1rkis the number of set used for testing
|
the emptiness condition 23 Consequently in order to state
|
our results precisely we consider without loss of generality
|
the case where the maximum number of switches is n the
|
results can be extended to any number For t1 t n1N
|
we introduce the following matrices which all belong to R1n
|
Ni1t1i11KAt
|
i1 for0tt1
|
Ni1t1t1i12KAt
|
i11At1
|
i1 for0tt2
|
Ni1t1t2t1i13KAt
|
i12At2
|
i11At1
|
i1for0tt3
|
Ni1t1tn2t1i1n1KAt
|
i1n2Atn2
|
i1n3 At1
|
i1
|
for0ttn1
|
Ni1t1tn2tn101i1nKAtn1
|
i1n2 At1
|
i1
|
24
|
Observe that these matrices verify
|
Si1t1tptxRnNi1t1tptx0 25
|
To verify 23 we investigate the intersection of
|
Si11t2tn1t0withnsets taken from 24 We notice that
|
in 24 there are exactly 1n1
|
i1tirow vectors defined recall
|
thatt1 t n1N hence 1n1
|
i1tin
|
In addition we also have with t11
|
Si11t2tn1t0xRnNi11t2tn1t0x0
|
with
|
Ni11t2tn1t01i1nKAt
|
i1n1Atn1
|
i1n2 Ai1
|
The next result gathers Corollary 1 and Lemma 2
|
Theorem 4 Assume that A1andA2are invertible and sup
|
pose there exists i112such that for every t2 t n1
|
N we either have Σi11t2tn10or one is able to build
|
an invertible matrix NRnnwhose lines are taken from 24
|
such that
|
iβ0KAii1n1MN1is nonnegative
|
ii the solution to
|
βt1LβtwithLNM1Aii1n1MN126
|
initialized with β0KAii1n1MN10remains
|
nonnegative for all future time
|
where we have set
|
M1i1nAtn1
|
i1n2 At2
|
i11Ai1
|
Then any solution to 14 exhibits no more than nswitches
|
Proof Using Corollary 1 any solution to 14 exhibits no
|
more than nswitches if 23 is satisfied with t11
|
andpn1 This means checking that the intersection of
|
S1tn1t0
|
i1in1iniwith the sets characterized by 24 and 25
|
is empty To check this emptiness condition it is enough to
|
exhibit nsets such that for every tN their intersection
|
withSi11t2tn1t0is empty This is equivalent to find n
|
rows in 24 such that the matrix NRnnformed by these
|
nrows is such that
|
Nx0 27DAAFOUZ et al CONEWISE LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH FINITEL Y MANY SWITCHES 9
|
implies
|
1i1nKAt
|
i1n1Atn1
|
i1n2 Ai1x0tN
|
ie implies
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.