text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
Then the function φsz1z2eµ2s zneµnsdefined
|
for every sRis nonnegative on R
|
Proof Observe that φ0z1 znandlimsφsz1
|
They are both nonnegative in the setup of the statement
|
Obviously if i is satisfied φ0onR If ii is satisfied we
|
have φ0onRandφ0z1 zn0
|
Without the sign constraints on z2 z n we have either
|
infRφφ0z1 znorinfRφlimsφsz1
|
orinfRφφs0for some s0R
|
such that φs00
|
Hence to guarantee the nonnegativity of φonRit remains
|
to check the positivity of φs0in the last case Observe
|
that given j2 nφs00is equivalent to
|
µjzjeµjs0n
|
i1
|
ijµizieµis0 Hence we have φs0z1
|
i2
|
ij1µi
|
µjzieµis0 and iii ensures that φs0010 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNAL VOL XX NO XX XXXX 2021
|
Theorem 5 allows deriving numerically tractable conditions
|
by iteratively applying 32 for any chosen value of n As
|
a title of example consider the case n4 By iteratively
|
applying 32 one can conclude that βt0for all tif
|
ρ10 ρ 11µ3
|
µ2ρ31µ4
|
µ2ρ40
|
andρ11µ4
|
µ31µ4
|
µ2ρ4033
|
To check that this is true first iterate 32 with n4 As
|
1µ4
|
µ31µ4
|
µ2ρ40or1µ4
|
µ31µ4
|
µ2ρ40 this
|
together with ρ10andρ11µ4
|
µ31µ4
|
µ2ρ40ensures
|
ρ11µ4
|
µ31µ4
|
µ2ρ4eµ4ssR
|
This together with ρ10andρ11µ3
|
µ2ρ31µ4
|
µ2ρ4
|
0ensures
|
ρ11µ3
|
µ2ρ3eµ3s1µ4
|
µ2ρ4eµ4ssR
|
Finally this last fact together with ρ10andβ0ρ1ρ2
|
ρ3ρ40ensures
|
ρ1ρ2eµ2sρ3eµ3sρ4eµ4ssR
|
We will exploit 33 for the insulin infusion example in
|
Section VIB
|
B Tailored results for small values of n
|
For small values of nn234 the function analysis
|
in the proof of Proposition 2 can be tailored to derive tighter
|
conditions
|
When n2 it is easy to see that φsz1z2eµ2s0
|
for every sRwith µ20 if and only if z10and
|
z1z20 The next propositions provide tailored results for
|
n3andn4
|
Proposition 3 Case n3With the notation of Proposition 2
|
withn3 we have φs0for all sRif and only if
|
z10z1z2z30and one of the following conditions is
|
satisfied
|
iz20
|
iiz20z30
|
iiiz20z30µ2z2µ3z30
|
ivz20z30µ2z2µ3z30and
|
z1z2µ2z2
|
µ3z3µ2
|
µ3µ2z3µ2z2
|
µ3z3µ3
|
µ3µ20
|
Proof Note that the cases where z2andz3have the same
|
signs is treated in items i and ii of Proposition 2 Hence
|
it remains to prove the result when z2andz3do not have the
|
same sign Recall that φsµ2z2eµ2sµ3z3eµ3s and
|
signφsigng with gz2µ3
|
µ2z3eµ3µ2s We also have
|
gsµ3
|
µ2z3µ3µ2eµ3µ2 thus signgsignz3 When
|
z2andz3do not have the same sign there exists one and only
|
ones0Rsuch that gs00see fig 2 We thus have the
|
following situations
|
Ifz20andz30 we have the situation described by
|
fig 2a We observe that φsminφ0 z10for
|
every sRIfz20andz30 we have the situation described by
|
fig 2b We observe that infRφφ0ifs00
|
φs0otherwise
|
Buts0is such that gs00 ie s01
|
µ3µ2lnµ2z2
|
µ3z3
|
We have s00if and only if µ2z2µ3z30 and
|
φs0z1z2µ2z2
|
µ3z3µ2
|
µ3µ2z3µ2z2
|
µ3z3µ3
|
µ3µ2
|
s
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.