text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
X F iˆΦeΦe
|
i10W
|
Φe
|
i10W X F iˆΦe
|
where we used 31 Theorem 21 ii v and similarly
|
inclusion 39b holds for i 0 N2 with
|
U F i1ΦνΦν
|
i10W
|
UF iˆΦνΦν
|
i10W
|
Φν
|
i10W UF iˆΦν
|
For the last candidate state and input we need to show
|
ˆzN1z
|
N Φe
|
N0wk X F N1ˆΦe
|
ˆvN1Kfz
|
N Φν
|
N0wk U F N1ˆΦν
|
Given that z
|
NαZf X F NΦe Φe
|
N0wk
|
Φe
|
N0WKfz
|
NαKfZf U F NΦν and
|
Φν
|
N0wkΦν
|
N0W we can confirm that
|
X F NΦeΦe
|
N0W X F N1ˆΦe
|
U F NΦνΦν
|
N0W U F N1ˆΦν
|
The terminal set constraints 32h32j are trivially ful
|
filled since the last block row of all candidate matrices
|
is equal to the last block row of the previous optimal
|
solution see 38 and ˆ αα therefore we get
|
ˆαAKfZfˆαZfˆΓW αAKfZfαZfΓW
|
ˆαZfX F NˆΦeαZfX F NΦe
|
ˆαKfZf UF NˆΦναKfZf UF NΦν
|
The terminal constraint ˆ zNˆαZfin 32h is also triv
|
ially fulfilled since
|
ˆzNAKfz
|
NΓwkαAKfZfΓW32j
|
αZf ˆαZf
|
9To show that 32k and 32l hold we first define the
|
candidates of auxiliary variables ψd
|
iΨd
|
ijfor a single ver
|
texDd ie for i 0 N2 we have
|
ˆψd
|
i d
|
Aˆzi d
|
Bˆviˆpi
|
d
|
Az
|
i1 d
|
Bv
|
i1p
|
i1
|
d
|
AΦe
|
i10 d
|
BΦν
|
i10Σ
|
i20
|
wk
|
ψd
|
i1 Ψd
|
i10wk
|
ˆΨd
|
ij d
|
AˆΦe
|
ij d
|
BˆΦν
|
ijˆΣi1j
|
d
|
AΦe
|
i1j1 d
|
BΦν
|
i1j1Σ
|
i2j1
|
Ψd
|
i1j1
|
and for the last timesteps we get
|
ˆψd
|
N1 d
|
AˆzN1 d
|
BˆvN1ˆpN1
|
d
|
Az
|
N d
|
BKfz
|
N
|
d
|
AΦe
|
N0 d
|
BΦν
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.