text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
N0Ξ
|
0
|
wk
|
d
|
Kfz
|
N Ψd
|
N0wk
|
ˆΨd
|
N1j d
|
AˆΦe
|
N1j d
|
BˆΦν
|
N1jˆΣNj
|
d
|
AΦe
|
Nj1 d
|
BΦν
|
Nj1Ξ
|
j1 Ψd
|
Nj1
|
ˆΨd
|
Nj d
|
AˆΦe
|
Nj d
|
BˆΦν
|
NjˆΞj
|
d
|
AΦe
|
Nj d
|
BΦν
|
NjΞ
|
j Ψd
|
Nj
|
Using these candidates we then check the inclu
|
sions 32k and 32l ie for i 0 N2 we get
|
ˆψd
|
i i1M
|
j0ˆΨd
|
ijW W
|
ψd
|
i1 Ψd
|
i10wk iM
|
j1Ψd
|
i1jW W
|
ψd
|
i1 iM
|
j0Ψd
|
i1jW W32k
|
σ
|
i2W ˆσi1W
|
and for iN1 we get
|
ˆψd
|
N1 N2M
|
j0ˆΨd
|
N1jW W
|
d
|
Kfz
|
N Ψd
|
N0wk N1M
|
j1Ψd
|
NjW W
|
αd
|
KfZfN1M
|
j0Ψd
|
NjW W32l
|
σ
|
NW ˆσNW
|
both of which satisfy 32k Finally 32l is trivially fulfilled by the candidate solution ie
|
ˆαd
|
KfZfN1M
|
j0ˆΨd
|
NjW W
|
αd
|
KfZfN1M
|
j0Ψd
|
NjW W32l
|
σ
|
NW ˆσNW
|
Since we impose 32k and 32l for each vertex Dd
|
individually the argument holds for all vertices of D
|
Therefore we have shown that the candidate solu
|
tions 37 38 satisfy all constraints in 32 which
|
proves recursive feasibility 2
|
Next we show that the closedloop system is inputto
|
state stable ISS where ISS is formally defined in 3
|
Definition B42 For the ISS proof we rely on an ISS
|
Lyapunov function 3 Appendix B6 which we define in
|
the following definition Note that due to the equivalence
|
of 1 and 35 we only need to check the stability of 35
|
to conclude ISS of the original system
|
Definition 5 ISSLyapunov function Consider
|
an RPI set S Rnwith the origin in its interior A
|
function VS R0is called an ISSLyapunov func
|
tion in Sfor system 35withuκMPCxandwW
|
if there exist Kfunctions γ1 γ2 γ3 and γ4 such that for
|
allx SandwW
|
γ1xVxγ2x 40a
|
VxVxγ3xγ4w 40b
|
where is any vector norm on Rn
|
Theorem 4 Given that Assumption 1 holds system 1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.