text
stringlengths 1
1.7M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
<<2XNK02!.DOC>>
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have attached a closing checklist for the Salmon Energy transaction
between ENA and PPL. Please review and advise of any comments. ENA has
requested final drafts of all documents by mid-day Friday in order that it
can immediately circulate documents for execution in anticipation of the
closing next week. Thank you.
Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Enclosure: 136928v2
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
- 2XNK02!.DOC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
there are still ena people using experience enron.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert, Carrie
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:43 PM
To: Mcconnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Piper, Greg; Beck, Sally; Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: EWS Q3 2001 experience ENRON Report
Attached is a summary report of the EWS tactical (revenue driven) and strategic (educational) visits to Enron supported by experience ENRON in third quarter 2001.
At experience ENRON, our goal is to support the EWS deal development teams by creating powerful Enron experiences that result in greater favorability and familiarity of Enron while differentiating us from the competition.
Our role is to:
Reduce time and labor costs associated with planning and execution of customer visits
Coordinate BU subject matter experts (SME's) to tell the Enron story, i.e. EOL, trading, etc.
Customize agendas aligned with Enron and customer objectives
Shorten sales cycles
We are here to support your team in reaching your goals. Please call with questions or changes.
Carrie Rob?rt
Manager, Enron Corporate Marketing
1400 Smith St.
EB 4703B
Houston, TX 77002
713-853-3522 Office
713-853-6790 Fax
713-416-2945 Cell
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/08/2001
01:21 PM ---------------------------
From: Max Eberts@EES on 07/06/2001 07:01 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Riley/Western Region/The
Bentley Company@Exchange
cc:
Subject: UC/CSU press release
Here is the approved press release. UC/CSU added a few more details
concerning the extension of the contract.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here are the notes I promised:
(See attached file: VALUE.ppt)
Mukesh
- VALUE.ppt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The meeting will take place at 11:00a.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williamson, Joannie
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:24 PM
To: '[email protected]'; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; James Hughes; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; McMahon, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Hickerson, Gary; Rieker, Paula; Valencia, Laura; Zoch, Judy; Blackwood, Connie; Chapman, Kay; Daw, Nicki; Elbertson, Janette; Ferrari, Kerry; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Harris, Stephanie J ; Heathman, Karen K.; Marshall, Lucy; McVicker, Maureen; Mendez, Yorleni; Schiller, Marsha; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Tori Wells; Westbrook, Sharron; Williamson, Joannie
Subject: Management Committee Meeting - Monday, December 17
Please reply and let me know if you will participate in person or via conference call. The dial-in number is 801-983-4013, please reference Ken Lay.
Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'd blow it off. Your batting 0.9999999999. In anybody's book, that's
phenomenal. Don't look back. And PR, under the circumstances, is doing a
stellar job overall. Vacation was nice. Thanks. Bad thing is it made me
realize how much more of it I need (and likely ain't gonna get soon).
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
05/29/2001 01:07 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: SF Gate: Enron's secret bid to save deregulation/PRIVATE
MEETING: Chairman pitches his plan to prominent Californians
That's what I told AP, but after I looked like a major doofus on the front
page of the Chronicle... The last few weeks have not been pretty for PR...
How was your vacation?
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/29/2001 11:13 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: SF Gate: Enron's secret bid to save deregulation/PRIVATE
MEETING: Chairman pitches his plan to prominent Californians
Seems to have Riordan written all over it. I say "no big deal." We're
talking to everyone. No secrecy involved. We'll keep talking, being
constructive and trying to help develop solutions that work for CA. Your
thoughts?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Steve,
Per your request, I have listed the companies (including the employees) not
participating in the All Employee Stock Option Program (AESOP).
TGS (Unconsolidated) Transredes (Unconsolidated)
Daniel Perone (Director) Javier Pantoja (VP)
Ray Alvarez (He will be eligible to participate, because he is on the
expat payroll)
If you have questions or need additional information, let me know.
Thanks.
Arquella
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
600395 and 600396 have been changed to 5/4 - 5/31.
600378 and 600379 have been changed to Q3-02.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
05/02/2001 02:37 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb
600378
600379
broker has Q3 02 on these 2 deals
600395
600396
broker has the 4-31st
thanks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Critical Migration Information:
1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 17th
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed the evening of your migration date.
Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.
If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
If you receive a call for a master netting directly from a customer to which you have not been assigned the file or contact, direct the call to Jay Williams at credit as he is the starting point.
Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have adjusted deal #152638 to cover the first 20 days of flow in Jan.
D
Jackie Young
05/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Hello Again,
Have you anything about 98-6725 for 1/2000 production for the 1st 20 days of
the month yet?
Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 12:37
PM ---------------------------
Anita Luong
05/30/2000 11:01 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Just want to check on this again. please let me know if you hear anything.
Thanks.
Jackie Young
05/26/2000 03:02 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Anita,
I spoke w/Daren and he apprised that he e-mailed Craig and that Craig has to
re-negotiate the deal and Daren will respond to me on Tuesday next week.
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------
Jackie Young
05/26/2000 08:45 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Hey Daren,
We're back on this issue again. There is gas out there for days 1-3 and 6-20
but the deal is only good for 21-31.
Can you assist Anita and I w/a deal number to place the 1st 20 days on.
Anita is attempting to close this issue.
As usual, thanks for your help.
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:42
AM ---------------------------
Anita Luong
05/26/2000 08:41 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:40
AM ---------------------------
Anita Luong
04/10/2000 02:13 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Jackie,
We are back on this issue again...........the deal was only good for day
21-31, don't we have to find out who this gas belong's to for days 1-20?
Stephanie still thinks this should be for Encina. Please advice.
Thanks
Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:19 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
I've just reallocated the meter.........................give a minute
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:18
PM ---------------------------
Daren J Farmer
04/03/2000 05:14 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
yes
Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:10 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Daren,
The above mentioned meter is on stranger's for the entire month of Jan.
2000. There is a deal ticket applicable to this meter from Jan. 21st thru
the 31st. Is it o.k. for Volume Management to apply volumes from the 21st
thru the 31st to the 215?
I don't know what kind of issues was associated with this deal.
Thanks
-Jackie-
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:08
PM ---------------------------
Anita Luong
04/03/2000 05:00 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Jackie, any luck on the issue w/ the gas allocated to "stranger's gas" at
this meter..........
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 02:29
PM ---------------------------
From: Stephanie Gomes 04/03/2000 10:00 AM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Anita, have you found out any further information about this meter. Encina
still beleives that we owe them for this gas.
Thanks, Stephanie (3-6004)
Anita Luong
03/03/2000 02:11 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Jackie,
I see that the gas at this meter is allocated to "stranger's" in POPS.
Stephanie Gomes in Settlement thinks that this could be Encina's gas. I see
in Sitara that deal 152638 is only valid from the 21st - 31st. Can you
please take a look.
Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Stephanie Gomes 03/03/2000 01:34 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing
Hey Anita,
For meter # 0986725, 1/00 production, I am showing per meter statement that
41,671mmbtu flowed. Is that gas really Encina's. Has the volume just not
been allocated yet. Could you let me know what the deal is on the meter.
Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks so much. Really appreciate it.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Cynthia Biggs [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:34 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: car res for 30oct
AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF ZEGPMK
DASOVICH/JEFF
ENRON CORP
101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
ENRON CORP SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
CAR RES ONLY
DATE: OCT 29 2001
CAR 30OCT HERTZ SAN F CA
31OCT CONFIRMATION: B62530DBC46
INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
RATE: USD49.99- .00 UNL DY 25.00- UNL XH
RATE GUARANTEED
PICK-UP: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
DROP-OFF: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
SCO
MISCELLANEOUS 28FEB HOUSTON TX
THU ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **
DASOVICH/JEFF S0C0011R1000
ASSISTANT: JOSEPH ALAMO 415 782-7841
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2001 01:36 PM -----
[email protected] 06/06/2001 09:16 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: PLEASE READ
Mark
I have a commodity futures account in which I only trade cattle and grain
futures, no energy.
Ken
Mark Taylor
(Vice To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List
President and cc:
General Subject: PLEASE READ
Counsel)
@ENRON
Sent by:
Enron
Announcements
@ENRON
06/05/01
06:42 PM
To: Department: ENA Legal
From: Mark Taylor Date: May 11, 2001
Vice President and General Counsel
Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications
We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit
exemptions for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading. These
applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees,
owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial
interest in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or
acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.
Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND
TO THIS REQUEST.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
2 primary contributing factors:
1) EOL transaction volume increase
2) CES acquisition
Paula Harris
10/09/2000 03:41 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: East Gas Volume Confirmation
Scott,
As you are already aware, we have to provide volume (settled sales only)
explanations to Investor Relations each month. Given that it's a quarter end
month, it is even more important that we receive good explanations which
sufficiently support your trading business. The format includes a year to
year comparison, quarter to quarter comparison as well as a month to month
comparison for any increases/decreases greater than 10%. Your stats are as
follows:
EAST GAS TRADING (Bbtu/Day - Settled Sales Only)
Year to Year
September 2000 7,258
September 1999 3,179
Increase 128%
Quarter to Quarter
3Q 2000 7,282
3Q 1999 2,910
Increase 150%
If you could send me an explanation explaining what's driving your increase
by tomorrow morning, that would be great.
Thanks, Paula
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Gerald, the ILL. atty. Chris Hilgert referred to is Chris Townsend -His number is 312-368-4039. The specific question is: can we utilize Com Ed for E service at Nicor's "Troy Grove" Facility? (Located near Troy Grove, ILL- approx 10 Miles North of the Town of La Salle, ILL) The Com Ed substation we would like to have power delivered at is approx 7 Miles N. of the facility near the town of Mendota, ILL.
Notes: 1) Nicor does not currently have an ILL Power service drop.(They are totally self gen.)
2) We would build line up to Com Ed and buy at the substation.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi...
-----Original Message-----
From: CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Alatorre, Hector; Alvarado, Orlando; Ambler, Margie; Anderson, Toi; Avioli, James; Beaty, Beverly; Blodgett, Kerry; Bowman, Terri; Buhrke, Cathy; Cabrera, Karina; Catlett, Laurie; Conley, Allan; Cortez, Diama; Cox, Ann; Cunningham, Larry; Dees, Debra; Doyle, Ronald; Eaton, John; Egner, Paul; Fitch, Terry; Flores, Gloria; Gallardo, E Sherri; Gallerano, John; Gensler, Quentin; Hargrove, Nancy; Heiser, Suzanne; Helburg, Charles; Hernandez, Angela; Higginbotham, Keith; Hodges, Ralph; Hungate, Cynthia; Immer, Ingrid; Kelley, Nancy; King, Mable; Kleiner, Margaret; Laird, Mary; Laughlin, Helen; Laurel, Liz; Levy, Michael; Lindloff, Monty; Loggins, Kenneth; Lowrey, Roseanne; McCauley, Laurie; Monley, John; Mott, Louella; Muenster, Kay; Nguyen, Michelle; Payne, Leon; Prevott, Rose; Prodoehl, Paul; Ramos, J Linda; Ramos, Mary; Ressel, Thomas; Roberts, Jan; Robertson, Constance; Rush, Russell; Scott, Mark; Shaull, Barbara; Silvas, Elizabeth; Sirois, Jeannette; Smith, Elsie; Symmank, Robert; Taylor, Charles; Wahlstrom, Scottie; Walleck, Lynn; Watson-Combre, Cassandra
Subject: System Imbalance Notice
October 24, 2001
To: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers and
Shippers
Re: System Imbalance Notice
Please be advised that Transco has been experiencing excessive
negative transportation imbalances (deliveries in excess of
receipts) on its system throughout the month. Effective
immediately, shippers are advised to avoid any additional
negative imbalances and return to a balanced position. Absent
voluntary compliance, it may become necessary for Transco to
suspend make-up deliveries for the remainder of the month.
Additionally, effective October 26, 2001 and until further
notice, Transco will institute more restrictive practices at its
pooling points. Transco will reduce the 4% tolerance currently
allowed at its pooling points to 1% or 1,000 dts for Shippers
with negatively scheduled imbalances (i.e. deliveries into the
pools are less than receipts away from the pools). Shippers with
positively scheduled imbalances at their pools will be held to
the 4% tolerance levels. Transco will not enforce these pool
imbalance tolerances during the timely nomination cycle; however,
Shippers are expected to balance their pools to the limits
identified above by the ID2 nomination cycle. Transco may
proactively decrease markets to bring them in line with supplies
at pooling points.
If you have any questions, please call Terry Fitch at (713) 215-
3361 or John McGrath at (713) 215-2514.
Terry C. Fitch
Manager
Gas Operations
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: "Baird, Steven L. - TP6SLB" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Baird+2C+20Steven+20L+2E+20-+20TP6SLB+22+20+3CSBaird+40socalgas+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Baird, Steven L. - TP6SLB; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: FW: Saturaday LA Times article on SoCal GCIM reward
Subject: Saturaday LA Times article on SoCal GCIM reward
In case you mised this ....
Gas Co. Asks to Recover Savings From Customers
Rates: Two-pronged request seeks to add more than $100 million to bills but offers to reduce that with PUC concessions like those that helped utility thrive.
By TIM REITERMAN, Times Staff Writer
Rates for Southern California Gas Co. customers have fallen in recent months, but they will rise again under an unusual two-pronged request submitted to state regulators Friday.
The Gas Co. asked that its 5 million customers repay about half of a record $223 million in natural gas cost savings the utility achieved for them in the volatile market of the last year. The average increase would amount to $1.52 per month, or about 3% on a typical monthly bill of $46.
But the Gas Co. said it would reduce its request to about $30 million if the state Public Utilities Commission agrees to continue an incentive program that has brought the utility millions of dollars and to change the rules for how much of the windfall goes to the company and how much to consumers. That would drop the monthly increase to about 44 cents on a typical bill.
Although such rate increases may seem relatively modest, they follow a winter season in which bills rose sharply--and that made it admittedly awkward for the Gas Co. to seek tens of millions of dollars more from its own ratepayers.
"To claim a huge reward for good performance in a year when ratepayers are paying at record levels did not look good," said Mike Florio of the Utility Reform Network, or TURN, a consumer watchdog group. "I think it speaks to the company's sense of reality that they did not try to squeeze every last nickel out of ratepayers. . . . It could have been a big, ugly fight."
While other gas and electric utilities have been battered by the natural gas market, the Gas Co. has thrived under a state incentive program that rewards utilities whenever they can purchase gas for less than market rates. By aggressively buying and selling, the Gas Co. managed savings in the last year that were almost 10 times the highest previous totals.
However, PUC officials raised questions about whether the Gas Co. should be entitled to its roughly 50-50 split with customers, which would amount to $106 million for the year ended in March. During recent negotiations, the company agreed to a compromise with the PUC's consumer protection arm and TURN.
'In for the Long Haul, Not the Quick Buck'
The Gas Co. now is willing to accept a smaller share of the savings for the last year--about 14%--and for future years.
"We're in this for the long haul, and not the quick buck," said Jim Harrigan, the company's director of gas acquisition. "We want to see [the incentive program] continue in the future" so it can benefit ratepayers and the company alike.
During a push for deregulation in the mid-1990s, the PUC created a program for the state's three major gas utilities--Southern California Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric and Pacific Gas & Electric--that was designed to give them added motivation to obtain the fuel at the best price for customers.
The program replaced contentious PUC reviews that determined whether the utilities bought gas at reasonable prices, and sometimes resulted in the companies having to pay back millions of dollars to customers.
By most accounts, the program achieved its goals at the Gas Co. During the first six years, the savings amounted to $75.7 million--$33.2 million of which went to the utility, and the rest to benefit customers.
But no one envisioned what would happen in the natural gas market over the last year, when prices along the California border skyrocketed. The Gas Co. used its purchasing power and storage and pipeline capacity to become a big player in the regional market.
In a trading room at its Los Angeles headquarters, the company conducts about 14,000 transactions a year, buying, selling, lending and trading gas. Last winter, when prices rocketed, one deal alone achieved savings of $70 million.
Harrigan said the company bought gas options in October and November.
"We looked at it as an insurance policy," he said. "Those were bought at between $6.50 [per million British thermal units] and $8--and the price ran to $10." Those prices allowed the Gas Co. to essentially apply the difference to the PUC's incentive program.
The PUC rules allow the Gas Co. to hedge to protect customers from price volatility, but they prohibit speculation in the marketplace. Harrigan said it is difficult to draw the distinction, but he added, "We recognize when we are incurring risk, and have tight controls over it."
The option purchases, he noted, were initiated by company Chairman Edwin A. Guiles and done in consultation with PUC officials. The options, he said, protected customers from December through March, when the Gas Co. achieved the lion's share of its $223 million in savings.
'I don't think . . . anyone anticipated savings this large," said Richard Myers, program supervisor at the PUC's Energy Division.
As the savings mounted through the winter and beyond, PUC officials reassessed the incentive program and questioned whether ratepayers should receive a larger share of the rewards. It was only fair, they reasoned, since customers pay for the pipeline capacity and other assets that allow the utility to beat the market.
On Friday, the Gas Co. filed a request with the PUC for its full share of the savings along with its proposed settlement with the agency's Office of Ratepayer Advocates and TURN. The agreement, which requires approval from the full commission, would divert more of the savings to customers.
Rather than the current 50-50 split, the proposed system would give the utility a maximum 25% of the savings.
"The sharing is not nearly as beneficial to the shareholders," said Anne Smith, the Gas Co.'s vice president for customer services and marketing. "We would have loved to preserve the current [split], but in the interest of ratepayers, we think this is a good deal."
Although the typical monthly winter bill for Gas Co. customers rose to $80 from $50 a year ago, the price has been dropping in recent months. June's gas cost of 52.1 cents per therm is about 26% over that of June 2000. But that is far lower than at San Diego Gas & Electric, which saw gas costs rise to $1.43 from 34 cents a year ago.
Executives of SDG&E, which like the Gas Co. is a unit of Sempra Energy, said they have no figures for their incentive program, which runs until July. Pacific Gas & Electric had no gas cost incentive savings this past year.
The Gas Co.'s large savings and aggressive trading have raised concerns that its activities may have driven market prices higher.
Although Florio of TURN praised the company for a job well done, he said, "I think one of the reasons they settled is to avoid a big fight" over whether its actions affected the market to the detriment of others.
"We could have spent three months and not come to a conclusion," he added.
Brian Cherry, PG&E's director of regulatory relations, said: "Until we can see the details behind the transactions, we are not certain as to what impact, if any, they had on prices at the California border."
Said Smith of the Gas Co.: "We do firmly believe our actions did not cause prices to go up for other customers." The market, she said, "is almost like a race. Some came out better than others."
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Margaret,
I don't have it. Maybe we can get a copy directly from the CBOT.
Info Central could help.
Vince
Margaret Carson@ENRON
04/18/2000 04:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Request from our Mexico City Office
Vince Do you or someone else down on the trading floor have a copy
of this book Ricardo can borrow??? If not any other ideas where I
can get it> thx Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2000
04:13 PM ---------------------------
Ricardo Charvel
04/18/2000 04:02 PM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Request
Margaret,
First of all I apologize for not sending you the information to complete the
chart that you gave me. I have been travelling because of work and then
vacation, maybe I spent 3 or 4 full working days in the office in the last 4
weeks. Now that I am going through my to do list I cannot find that page
that you gave me . Could you please send it to me again?
On the other hand I was wondering if maybe within Enron possibly at Info
Central or with one of your friends at the trading desk you could get me a
copy of a book titled: Chicago Board of Trade Commodity
Trading Manual
ISBN: 1579580025
Publisher: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, Incorporated
Pub. Date: December 1997
It si not in stock at the dot com libraries and it will take them a long
time to deliver. I need this bbok in order to produce a document that Steve
Kean requested from me a couple of weeks ago.
Thank you very much for your help.
Best,
Ricardo
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Do you still want to make the trip to Dallas for the Southwestern Legal Foundation on Friday, November 2?
Travel to Austin for Trustees mtg. on the nights of Thursday, November 8, 9, 10 and checkout on 11th?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2001 9:37 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Choyce,
Ken; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: "One Texan is better than one hundred taliban".
> A large group of Taliban soldiers are moving down a road when they hear a
> voice call from behind a sand-dune.
>
> "One Texas soldier is better than ten taliban".
>
> The Taliban commander quickly sends 10 of his best soldiers over the dune
> whereupon a gun-battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then
> silence.
>
> The voice then calls out "One Texan is better than one hundred taliban".
>
> Furious, the taliban commander sends his next best 100 troops over the
dune
> and instantly a huge gunfight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again
> silence.
>
> The Texan voice calls out again "One Texan is better than one thousand
> taliban".
>
> The enraged Taliban Commander musters one thousand fighters and sends
> them across the dune. Cannon, rocket and machine gun fire ring out as a
huge
> battle is fought. Then silence.
>
> Eventually one wounded taliban fighter crawls back over the dune and with
his
> dying words tells his commander, "Don't send any more men, its a trap.
> There's actually two of them."
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stacey, I will out of the office from May the 2nd to May the 21st. Amy
Cavazos will be flipping out all Canada deals while I am out. Amy knows how
to run the macro report to insure all deals have been flipped out. You may
reach Amy at 713-345-4074 if she is unavailable you may reach Laura Vargas at
713-345-8197 and Errol 713-345-8274.
Thank You,
Sherry
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sandra,
I'm sending you a standard request for EEO compliance for subcontractors. I understand that you process these.
--Lizzette
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please do not reply to this e-mail.
You are receiving this message because an invoice requiring coding, issue resolution, or approval has been submitted to your iPayit inbox. This requires your action through iPayit.
To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
http://iPayit.enron.com
Note: Log into iPayit using the same Employee PID (P-Number) and Password you use to enter the eHRonline system and/or SAP.
First time iPayit user? For training materials, click on the link below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265
Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
If you are in Europe, please contact European Accounts Payable at +44 20 7783 7520.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I just received this today.
----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 08/30/2000 04:17 PM -----
"Marcelo Armas M." <[email protected]>
08/30/2000 02:04 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Internet trading
Brent,
I was under the impression that this memo had been sent last week. I
apologize for the confusion. Please contact me for any questions you may
have.
Regards,
Marcelo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Para: Marcelo Armas M. <[email protected]>
Fecha: Martes, 29 de Agosto de 2000 12:25 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Internet trading
>
>Marcelo,
>
>Have you had a chance to finalize your review of the ISDA agreement and
>legal survey? Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the
>materials.
>
>Regards,
>
>Brent
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Memo Internet final.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here are the sp's, please have the contact w/ NE call me to discuss further.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks Mona, good summary. I would like to discuss making the following
proposals to the commission:
1) Require PG&E to submit their evaluation criteria and weighting in advance
of the auction. This will help eliminate any subjectivity that favors their
affiliate. If the commission is interested in a fair auction with no
preference given to pge gen, this request should be hard to argue with. It
may also give us information about how they will try to move this process in
pge gen's favor. It also gives us a platform to debate the auction process
and gain some additional concessions.
2) Propose that any negative tax ramifications for ratepayers and state
residents resulting from a sale to the affiliate should be factored out of
the affiliate's bid. This will create a more level playing field and
maximize the value to ratepayers. We may want to get Arthur Anderson
involved in helping with this assessment.
3) Have the bids independently evaluated by one or more third parties
selected by consensus of the interested parties.
Also, are there any market power issues with the affiliate owning this much
generation in the utility service area? How could the affiliate
theoretically abuse this generation to benefit the utility or PG&E corp?
These issues should also be highlighted in any filing.
The outcome of this auction is extremely important to EES. We stand to make
considerably more money the higher the sale price. From my perspective, it's
a top priority for us to apply whatever resources are needed to ensure a fair
auction. The other factor to consider is time, which works against us.
I would appreciate discussing our plan of action in this proceeding. If we
need to develop a plan, we are more than happy to help.
Mike
Mona L Petrochko
10/04/99 08:07 PM
To: Mike Harris/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: hydro auction
The question is legitimate. With the potential for exchanges among
affiliates being very real, the only possible solution is to either prohibit
affiliate participation or make iron-clad the confidentiality/non-disclosure
agreement. Of course, once you allow the affiliate to participate, being
able to determine if an "inappropriate" transfer of information has occurred
is almost impossible. The other problem is that Enron has been an advocate
of affiliate participation in the sale of assets, as long as the relationship
was arms-length and no preferential treatment was provided. As proposed,
PG&E states that its affiliate will be treated the same as other bidders.
So, I think that leaves us with buttressing the proposed confidentiality
language to prevent such exchanges as much as possible.
We would also have to assume, for the information to be beneficial to PG&E's
affiliate, that it would result in PG&E Gen obtaining the assets. As
proposed by PG&E, they would have to be the highest bidder, taking into
consideration certain tax benefits associated with the sale to an affiliate
(PG&E's proposal, not my assessment). In other words, PG&E claims that the
ultimate determination of the winning bidder is price. If the result was
that PG&E Gen paid more for these assets than anyone else, it becomes a
little more difficult to claim that the auction was unfair.
However, I believe that the ultimate determination is price, with a caveat.
The caveat is acceptance by PG&E of amendments to the attached service
agreements. PG&E allows for bidders to submit amendments to the service
agreements, but PG&E retains the right to reject the amendments if not
acceptable to them. PG&E Gen may know what amendments are and are not
acceptable. That may be the inside track for the affiliate. But again, I
think it brings us back to ensuring equitable treatment as much as possible
in the auction protocol rather than preventing PG&E Gen from participating.
If you feel this is not adequate, please let me know.
Enron Energy Services
From: Mike Harris 10/04/99 04:42 PM
Phone No: 713 853-6091
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Dennis Benevides, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: hydro auction
Mona,
Jeff pointed me to you. Below are some concerns I have on the PG&E hydro
auction. What are your thoughts on the opportunity for PG&E Gen to adversely
affect the auction outcome through access to non-public information? Also,
how strong are the mitigants against this behavior?
Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Harris/HOU/EES on 10/04/99 06:40 PM
---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Mike Harris 10/04/99 06:32 PM
Phone No: 713 853-6091
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: hydro auction
Jeff,
Who is handling the PG&E hydro auction?
I have a concern about PG&E Generation's participation in this auction.
Every press release from PG&E on this topic goes out of its way to state that
PG&E Gen will be a bidder. My concern is their access to non-public
information and how this may skew the results of the auction. If you're the
person on this, let's talk. If not, pls let me know who is. Hope you're
doing well.
Mike
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Palmer, B. Scott would like to recall the message, "EOL products".
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We also need a box that says "Include only Dart Deals"
Please also make absolutely sure that this is included in the PSW build route, as we use it nearly exclusively now.Vish knows about our problems with that.
Cara
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: DART product
Cara:
Please see the attached email below for what IT is planning to modify Build Routing report to accomodate and differentiate DART products. From what we've discussed, you would like to have the default as with the "exclude DART deals" checked, right? Also, did you also say you want IT to create another function for this report to run DART deals only (so the report will only show DART products) so real time schedulers can run it to see what he/she needs to pick up?
-Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: Kraltchev, Nikolay
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Chang, Fran
Subject: DART product
Fran,
We worked on excluding the DART deals from the BuildRoute report.
The report will look like that:
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
If you have the "Exclude DART deals" box unchecked then you will get a file like this:
<< File: BRtestP1_3Deals_Nov26.xls >>
Deal 500056.1 is a DART deal.
If you have "Exclude DART deals" box checked then you will get a file like this:
<< File: BRtestP2_3Deals_Nov26.xls >>
Please let me know if that's what you need to see.
I can send you similar files that show more then 3 deals.
Thanks!
Nikolay
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Crooks, William
Subject: RE: Important! DART product
Bill:
Since the Enpower status meeting is cancelled today, just wanna follow up with you on the progress of the DART project. I would appreciate it if you could let me know so I can update the traders on this.
Regards,
Fran
503.464.7973
-----Original Message-----
From: Crooks, William
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Chang, Fran
Subject: RE: Important! DART product
Fran:
The change would not take long provided if we could easily identify DART deals. At this point we will have to research identifying DART deals. We don't know the answer yet. There is a higher priority project (secondary legal entities) which we hope to complete next week. We'll schedule this change after that.
Regards,
Bill x53492
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Crooks, William
Cc: Smith, Will; Moorer, Torrey
Subject: FW: Important! DART product
Bill:
EOL IT group (Torrey Moorer) has created a new DART product for us in testing stage. We will need the Build Route Reports to be revised accordingly (please see the attached emails). Would you have someone in your group work on this and let us know the timeline so we can follow up. Please call me if you have any questions.
Regards,
Fran Chang
West Power Risk Management
503.464.7973 (phone)
503.464.3740 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Crandall, Sean
Subject: RE: Important! DART product
I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position.
That should take care of it.
(Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about).
-----Original Message-----
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: FW: Important! DART product
Importance: High
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Crandall, Sean
Subject: Important! DART product
Importance: High
Sean:
Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the "DART flag" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place.
Thanks,
Fran Chang
West Power Risk Management
503.464.7973 (phone)
503.464.3740 (fax)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041210.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/12/01
TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BERT
ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I spoke with Jeff Dasovich this afternoon.
Marty and I would like your assistance with the following action and follow
up:
Please provide feedback & input, via e-mail, to Marty and I by 7:00 AM on
Tuesday, January 02, 2001. Jeff Dasovich would prefer to see our input on a
consolidated basis, so let's only provide the final input to Jeff on Tuesday
afternoon.
If you are in the "to" section of this e-mail, please attend an 8AM meeting,
Tuesday, January 02, 2001, in 8C1. A dial in # has been set up for those
that require it: 1-800-991-9019, pass code 6243703. If you have any
difficulty dialling in, please contact Carol Moffet @ 713-853-6658 /
Esmerelda Hinojosa @ 713-345-7390.
At this 8AM meeting, we will consolidate feedback and input and assure that
we are on target across the business. In addition, we'll sort through what
action is required to provide concise and substantial input to the formal
response due to Governor Davis' office.
We owe this written feedback to Jeff Dasovich by 3PM, CST on Tuesday, January
02, 2001.
If you believe any one else should be included in providing input & / or be
at the Tuesday meeting, please forward this information to them.
If you need any additional information or clarification between now and
Tuesday, January 02, please contact me at:
(home) 713-688-1622
(cell) 281-650-1199
(office) 713-853-7903
Thank you for your input and assistance.
Regards to you and your families for a happy, healthy and safe New Year
celebration.
Dan
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/29/2000 12:11 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES,
Michael Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES,
James Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting with Governor Davis, need for additional comments/suggestions
All:
Please see attached materials from Steve Kean. Ken Lay and Steve Kean met
yesterday with the Governor of California and his policy director to discuss
solutions to California's energy problems. The meeting was very
constructive. Ken Lay and Steve offered some of Enron's proposed solutions
and the Governor discussed the options he's considering. We've been asked to
provide--by Tuesday--feedback on his proposals. The turn-around time is
tight, particularly in light of the holiday. We'll need your feedback by COB
Monday. If at all possible, if folks can group their feedback, comments and
suggestions and foward them along to me, that would be very helpful. If
there is anyone else that you think ought to receive this information, please
forward along. Thanks very much for you help.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 11:33 AM -----
Steven J Kean
12/28/2000 09:19 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Meeting with Governor Davis, need for additional
comments/suggestions
We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA. In attendance were Ken Lay,
the Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself. The gov.
spent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his
ideas. He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next
week as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.
Attached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on
my discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff
Dasovich and I prepared. Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our
proposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation
based on the governor's comments:
Overview: We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that
we are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing
communication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to
go bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what
the utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees. His staff has more
work to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea. He
talked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail
level. He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the
benefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he
would dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power
(which he estimates at 3000MW). He foresees a mix of market oriented
solutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix
the problem by '02 and provide some political cover.
Our proposals: I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also
included the forward price information several of you provided). He seemed
interested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a
goal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities
to gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate
analysts and other "nonadvocates" to develop solutions to a number of issues
including designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.
He was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas
purchases. As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding
some state sponsored credit support for the utilities.
His ideas: The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously
under serious consideration and some of which were mere "brainstorming".
Some of these ideas would require legislative action.
State may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a "couple" of
generation plants. The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that
they are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases. This
was a frequently recurring theme.
Utilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus
basis to consumers.
Municipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in
California.
State universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more
widely deploy distributed generation.
Expand in-state gas production.
Take state lands gas royalties in kind.
negotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for
addtional gas supplies.
Empower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant
maintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at
any one time.
Condition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.
Either eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear
more about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be
able to help out here).
Wants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state. We made
some headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy
some portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation
thereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control
approach with generators.
Securitize uncollected power purchase costs.
To dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's
thoughts and get them to Kari)
He wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload --
not just the 5 one year strips.
He wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.
He would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the
deal.
He wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the
forward contracting issues.
Thanks to everyone for their help. We made some progress today.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'm fine with this approach.
-----Original Message-----
From: Herndon, Rogers
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc: Edison, Andrew
Subject: NRG - Confidential
Kevin -
NRG has agreed to release their transcripts to us in consideration of our agreeing to a propsed non-binding dispute resolution process. In essence, we will exchange transcripts and position papers with NRG and we will have 10 days to review. If we do not settle within that 10 day period we will enter into non-binding mediation in Chicago fbefore 12/15/01. No legal action can commence until madiation concludes.
I am perfectly fine with this approach. In my opinion, it signals a softening of their stance. If mediation does not result in an acceptable outcome, or if their transcripts do not change our minds, all of our avenues are still open.
I am going to sign the letter on behalf of EPMI agreeing to this unless you have a problem (Andy has reviewed).
Rogers
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Steve and Cindy,
Please see attached.
Suzanne
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Who's up for an offshore fishing trip???????
- linziboat42_(2).jpg
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Crude Spread http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread32.pdf
Heat Spread http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread32.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread32.pdf
Heat Crack http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack32.pdf
Gas Crack http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack32.pdf
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is the last draft of the EPC contract for TurboPark. I'm told that
it has been blessed by the accountants but it won't be official until the
TurboPark documents are all signed and sealed, a process that is underway.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jim,
I am very interested in supplying your gas and plan on responding to your request for qualification. If there is anything else that you need in the meantime, please give me a call.
Thanks,
Kim
713-853-0685
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim White <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jim+20White+20+3Cjim+2Ewhite+40las-cruces+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: RFP Qualifications
Kim: I just wanted to touch base to see if you received the RFP. I am
trying to see who is interested
in our gas service at this time for next September. Thanks.
Jim
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI guys. Save this stuff for after hours.
PL
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
10:17 AM ---------------------------
Jeffrey C Gossett
02/14/2001 10:13 AM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
I am the last one to have a problem with people throwing balls around.
However, Frank Vickers had a client from another firm here today and people
were shooting baskets while the clients were looking on. I'm sure
professionalism is not the first thing they thought of as they were watching
this. While it is important that everyone have fun, it is more important
that we are a seen as a professional organization. We are on the same floor
as the originators and therefore there will be many clients coming through
here in the future. It would be a shame not to get business because someone
in our group was firing jumpers. Thanks for your help in ensuring that this
doesn't happen again.
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Good idea. I wouldn't mind something that says that funding of the escrow is
tantamount to closing of the financing under the letter agreement, so that
the financing condition is satisfied. Something to that effect. It will
calm Jake down considerably.
Kay
"Campbell, Carolyn" <[email protected]> on 04/19/2001 04:07:07 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ENA Request for Instruction from PPL
Kay:
Another thought: It seems that perhaps we should require a letter from PPL
instructing ENA that the attached forms of Promissory Note, Security
Agreement and Financing Statement are the forms desired, negotiated and
approved by PPL for purposes of obtaining its financing, and acknowledging
that PPL indemnifies ENA from and against, and that ENA shall have no
liability or responsiblity, whether pursuant to the letter agreement or as
sole member or otherwise for, the substance or content of the Promissory
Note, Security Agreement and Financing Statement. What do you think?
Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
;
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: Re: ENA Agreement as to Forms of Agreements
Is there anything we need to get them to consent to?
Kay
"Campbell, Carolyn" <[email protected]> on 04/19/2001 02:17:42 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Keffer, John"
<[email protected]>
Subject: ENA Agreement as to Forms of Agreements
<<30b202!.DOC>>
Greg and Isabel:
Enclosed is the initial draft of a letter agreement by ENA consenting to
the
form of the ENA Consent, the Promissory Note, the Security Agreement and
the
Financing Statement, prepared along the same lines as the GE consent.
Please review and advise of any comments. Thank you.
Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Enclosure 140366v2
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
(See attached file: 30b202!.DOC)
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
You should be ok, try again.
Enron North America Corp.
From: Michael Walters 07/21/2000 01:25 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: League Site Available
After selecting my name, the system "does not recognize who I am." Am I
registered?
Mick
Enron North America Corp.
From: Eric Bass 07/20/2000 11:25 AM
To: [email protected], Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: League Site Available
Our League Site has been set up. It is the same site as last year. Please
take some time to Change your team name and logo. In addition, for those new
players, the rules are listed on the site.
Let me know if you have questions.
The league abbreviation is kourn.
http://football0.commissioner.com/mp/splash/join-mgmt
Eric
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Starting on the timely process for gas day of July 28th forward. We will now start using the cut code of PRD when we allocate Socal based on there window, whether above or below the 750,000 firm capacity. The only time that you will use the cut code CCD, is when the outage is truly related to TW. There will be more procedure to follow, regarding the data request from FERC. If you have questions or concerns, please ask Terry Kowalke, Darrell Schoolcraft, or Lynn Blair. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I will get some time on your calendar to discuss Canadian coordination in
general.
Thanks. Vicki
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 04/04/2001 02:19
PM ---------------------------
From: James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 10:53 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: Canadian Retail
Perhaps we could discuss this following the GC meeting tomorrow. Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Crawford, Sharon On Behalf Of Keohane, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: Canadian Retail
Jim and Mark, as you know, we have established a retail affiliate within
Enron Canada known as Enron Direct. In addition, EES has a Canadian entity,
EES Canada, which was established for the purposes of entering into some
cross-border transactions in Canada. For various reasons, it has been
decided to roll Enron Direct into EES Canada reporting, commercially, to Rob
Milnthorp, who will in turn report to Dave Delainey. There are two
legal/governance-related issues that I wanted to raise with you:
1. Governance: As a result, it will be necessary to make various corporate
re-organizations to EES Canada. This will include having EES Canada
established as an Alberta corporation, where Enron Canada has, and Enron
Direct will have, its principal Canadian office. In relation to this, I was
considering that EES Canada should be organized consistent with Enron Canada,
with two Canadian resident nominee directors and Canadian-resident officers.
A few years back, it was decided, for corporate law and, more importantly,
tax-related "permanent establishment" issues, that all directors and officers
of Enron Canada would be Canadian-resident employees of Enron Canada.
Accordingly, Enron Canada was re-organized with a nominee board of directors
consisting of Rob Milnthorp (as the senior commercial employee) and me (as
the senior legal employee) with a Canadian slate of officers being the
Vice-Presidents or Managing Directors in Canada responsible for the various
commercial or commercial-support groups. I was thinking of doing likewise
with EES Canada. Although I have not yet obtained a copy of the corporate
records for EES Canada, I believe the current directors of EES Canada are Jim
and an outside lawyer at Blake, Cassels & Graydon in Toronto, Ernest McNee.
I am not sure, but it is also likely that various US-based employees of EES
are designated as the officers of EES Canada. Would it be appropriate to
re-organize EES Canada along the same lines that Enron Canada has been
organized, or do you have concerns?
2. Law Firm: Following-up on our conversation last week, I want to confirm
that our continued use of Donahue Ernst & Young for this retail project was
"grandfathered" on the basis that they were "up the learning curve" on a
number of the contracting, regulatory, licensing and market participation
issues. There is one twist, however, with respect to EES Canada. Although I
was not involved, I believe that EES Canada was established to execute on
some gas transactions in Ontario with the use of a Blakes partner in Toronto,
Ernest McNee. However, as the focus of the business initiative in Canada
will, at least in the near future, be more involved and predominantly, if not
entirely, in Alberta; and as Donahue Ernst & Young is involved in regulatory
proceedings on our behalf with respect to market design issues affecting the
Alberta gas and power markets, as well as being familiar with the licensing
and contracting requirements for Enron Direct in Alberta; and given my
understanding that Blakes' involvement with EES Canada has been relatively
limited, I think it would make sense to have Donahue Ernst & Young continue
on with this matter. I am, however, sensitive to Jim's concerns, and
therefore wanted your thoughts on the matter.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Peter
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Enron and the curse of Drexel
Commentary: Energy trader's friends dry up
By David Callaway <<mailto:[email protected]>>, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 1:15 AM ET Nov. 1, 2001
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- It was the master of its universe.
Its employees were rich, young and ruthless. It treated its clients and rivals alike, with disdain. Its leader counseled business tycoons and political powerbrokers alike. And when the bottom finally fell out, it didn't have a friend in the world to save it.
Wall Street loves a success story. But it loves a success story gone wrong even more. Such was the case for Drexel Burnham Lambert, the junk bond empire of the 1980s, whose spiritual leader Michael Milken orchestrated one of the greatest financial shell games of all time before it collapsed in a heap of federal investigations, losses and the largest bankruptcy in Wall Street history.
For Enron, the energy trading giant that has seen its shares lose more than two-thirds of their value this month amid questions about its financial transactions and its stability, the similarities are striking.
Like Drexel, Enron set out to change an industry. Like Drexel, it succeeded, for a while. Under the guidance of Chairman Ken Lay, Enron evolved from a backwater Texas natural-gas pipeline company to become the nation's largest energy merchant.
Its EnronOnline business transformed the way energy trading was done and funneled hundreds of billions of dollars in transactions through the company in last two years. The aggressive trading philosophy geared to squeezing a profit at all costs made millionaires of many employees, while those who were not deemed worthy simply vanished from the trading rooms, no questions asked. Enron was and is the dark star of the energy industry.
For his part, Lay became an international corporate celebrity, advising President Bush on his campaign and taking a lead role with Vice President Dick Cheney on the administration's controversial energy plan earlier this year.
But Enron's attempt to extend its dominance into the telecom industry and its secretive financial structure finally got the best of it. The unexplained resignation of its chief executive in August, the ouster of its chief financial officer last week and the company's inability to prove its financial health have prompted investors to bail out of Enron stock like jackrabbits escaping a brushfire.
Now Lay & Co. are busy trying to raise cash from a skeptical Wall Street that is starting to admit it never understood the business in the first place (sound familiar?). Takeover speculation gave Enron shares a boost Wednesday, helping it end a 10-day losing streak. But it's unlikely anyone is going to step into this mess before a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into its finances yields a few more answers.
For investors, a short-term rally beyond the jump Wednesday is still possible now that all of the big mutual funds have dumped the shares. But at a closing price of $13.90, Enron shares are more than a Texas mile from their 52-week high of $84.88 last December.
For Enron itself, it's time to put its cards on the table with regulators and Wall Street. As the Drexel saga showed, a strategy of defiance to the end only hastens the end.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------
Kathryn Corbally@ENRON
11/21/2000 08:12 AM
To: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Laura
Valencia/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Participation in Houston Analyst Meeting People Video
You have been nominated to participate in a video which will be shown during
the Houston analyst meeting. The objective of the video is to demonstrate the
depth, diversity and transferability of Enron people. The video will be shown
early in the day's presentations and will also help set up the theme for the
day which is Execute and Extend.
I am attaching a briefing note which outlines the questions that we would
like you to answer on video. In addition I would be grateful if you could
supply me with a map of your career - ie a list of all the business units and
associated groups in which you have held positions at Enron.
Laura Valencia - Houston ( Ext 3-6785) or Fiona Grant - London (Ext 5308)
will be calling you to schedule a specific date and time for the shoot.
Many thanks for your help with this video.
If you have any questions please call me on 3-4785.
Kathryn
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We have WV produced TCo. To my knowledge we have no Mountaineer. CES never
wanted to buy Mountaineer production because of the daily balancing for both
the production and the end-user side.
John
Chris Germany@ECT
03/13/2000 10:14 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: [email protected], Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: CES needs for March
Do we currently have any Mountaineer or West Virginia production?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 10:11
AM ---------------------------
From: John M Singer @ ENRON 03/13/2000 09:51 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES needs for March
I have no contacts to buy from. Mountaineer production is normally sold on
term deals.
Chris Germany@ECT
03/13/2000 09:36 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]
Subject: CES needs for March
CES needs 17dts/day of Mountaineer gas for the rest of March. The request
was made by Kim Novesak??
I will be out this afternoon. Please call Brian Perrone (703-561-6486) or
Scott Goodell at 713-853-7711.
Thanks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kevin,
Who in legal have you been working with? Tracy was wondering when we thought we would receive the money.
Thanks, Kim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement
Any idea when or if we will receive the money?
-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Moore, Jan; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: FW: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement
FYI, Kim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Moseley, Debbie; Watson, Kimberly; Cherry, Paul
Cc: Gadd, Eric; Harris, Steven
Subject: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement
Earlier this year I requested that the Enron litigation unit file suit against Oasis Dairy for collection of unpaid transport bills on TW. The suit was filed in the fifth judicial district court in Chaves County, NM.
On October 1, 2001, TW was granted summary judgement in the case by the court in the amount of $29,250.56 inclusive of back interest and attorney fees. This amount will continue to accrue interest at 8.75% per annum until paid by Oasis.
If you would like a copy of the judgement, please let me know.
kh
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI - This is a memo that Jim Scabareti sent to Clayton Preble and others on
the AGL team regarding the deal and potential regulatory issues. I thought
you might like to see it. I will be talking to Jim and Clayton later today,
and will give you an update thereafter. If you have any questions, please
ask.
Ed
---------------------- Forwarded by Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 10/24/2000 03:15:52 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: VSCC Regulatory Strategy - Gas Cost Prudency - Asset Management
Opportunity
Ed - see attached for your information - Jim
- BESTRA~1.DOC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on 06/12/01 09:37 AM -----
"Michael
Gagliardi" To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<mikegag@msn. <[email protected]>
com> cc:
Subject: Fw: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #59
06/12/01
09:19 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #59
True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service
Volume 9, E-Mail/Fax #59, Monday, June 11, 2001
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
Phone
512-795-8536
Horns Land Strong-Armed QB, Swift Athlete as 5th, 6th Commitments
Texas is up to six commitments already after getting pledges Monday from
QB
Billy Don Malone, 6-2 1/2, 185, 4.7, of Paris North Lamar, and RB/Athlete
Clint Haney, 5-11, 190, 4.27 (that 4.27 was clocked at the A&M Nike camp).
Both athletes play in Class 4A.
Malone and Haney both attended the UT mini-camp Sunday, then got offers
Monday from the Longhorns due to the ridiculous new NCAA rule
interpretation
(same old rule, new legal interpretation) that doesn't allow kids to
commit
at summer camps. Normally, both would have been offered by coach Mack
Brown
at the conclusion of their mini-camp sessions.
Malone said he chose Texas over Tennessee, Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa State,
TCU and SMU. He said ISU, TCU and SMU had offered, and North Lamar head
coach
Tom Felty said Tennessee, Arkansas and Colorado coaches had told him they
were preparing to offer his prize pupil.
Haney said he picked the Longhorns over Texas Tech and Colorado (offers)
and
several other schools who were recruiting him.
Malone, who has been All-District at quarterback and free safety and in
basketball as a sophomore and junior, was the district's sophomore of the
year in both sports.
"He has a great arm," Felty said, "but what really makes him special is
the
way he sees the entire field. He can find his second and third receivers
and
he never just locks onto one guy. He's also a very physical player. That's
what makes him such a fine free safety, and it also helps him at
quarterback
because he will hang in there until the last split second to get a
completion
even when he knows he's going to get decked."
There have been some questions about Malone's speed, but Felty said, "We
play
in a district with a lot of fast players and I've never seen him caught
from
behind. He ran for 405 net yards rushing and four touchdowns, and he had
more
than that, but all quarterbacks get sacked and that brought his total
down.
He's a threat running or passing."
His passing is what attracted the Longhorns. Playing for a young 6-4 team,
he
completed 106 of 202 passes (52.4%) for 15 touchdowns and had seven
interceptions.
Felty said Malone "really loves to play football. He even loves practice.
Sometimes I have the second-team quarterback working and I see him over
playing receiver for the scout team. He's ready to practice and ready to
play
every day."
Malone said he is happy to be a Longhorn. "It's a dream come true," he
said.
"My coach told me he thought they were going to offer and I was hoping
they
would because I really want to play for the Longhorns."
Asked what he thinks are his strong suits, he said, "I think I have a good
arm and pretty good speed, but I think mental attitude is really important
and I play hard and play to win all of the time."
Haney, who rushed 266 times for 1,665 yards (6.25 yards per carry) and 19
touchdowns, also was a big threat as a receiver, catching 9 passes for 205
yards and four touchdowns for the 11-2 Ramgers. He said when he committed,
"Coach Brown said they were recruiting me as a football player. He told me
they want fast, athletic kids and they would find a spot for me after I
get
there."
That spot could be running back, but it probably will be wide receiver or
defensive back.
Smithson Valley defeated San Marcos in the Class 4A playoffs last year,
and
Haney said San Marcos' defensive tackle Earl Anderson, another UT pledge,
"is
really fast to be so big. I broke about a 40-yard touchdown run in that
game
and he was right behind me most of the way. I'm glad we're going to be on
the
same side at Texas."
Asked why he picked the Longhorns, he said, "Texas has great facilities
and
great coaches and it's a first-class academic institution." With a 93.4
grade
average and a qualifying test score already, he said the way the Longhorn
coaches stressed academics along with athletics was a big factor in his
decision."
The Longhorns' other commitments are from OL Brett Valdez of Brownwood, DT
Lyle Sendlein of Scottsdale, Arizona, and DT Sonny Davis, who signed with
Texas last year, but is having to go to a junior college in Mississippi
because he failed to qualify academically. Davis said he did so well in
his
first year in the JC that he has a chance to graduate in time to enroll at
Texas next January and go through spring practice.
My next e-mail/fax will be whenever events warrant.
* * * *
The True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service includes at least 99 fax/e-mails a
year and costs $99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes
26
newsletters and is published weekly during football season and twice
monthly
during most of the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both
for $130 (or $110 if you take the faxes via E-Mail or $99 if you take the
faxes and newsletter via E-Mail). Send check to address at the top of
page.
I also update my 900 number ? 1-900-288-8839 ? frequently with recruiting
news. My E-Mail address is: [email protected].
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Brenda:
If Elizabeth is here on Monday, could you please put this on her calendar?
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 02:08 PM -----
Carol St Clair
06/01/2000 02:04 PM
To: Gaurav Babbar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Monday's Conference Call
There will be a conference call on Monday June 5th starting at 1:00 (Houston)
time to discuss comments to the draft insurance policy that we expect to
receive from ACE tomorrow. My assistant, Suzanne Adams (713-853-3989) will
notify the Enron people of the conference room and will notify the LeBeouf
people of the call-in number.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
Suzanne:
Please reserve a conference room from 1-4 for myself, Gaurav, Leslie,
Elizabeth and Bill and please set up a conference call in number and e-mail
that information to Scott, John and Sam.
Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Julie, Please use the attached version. I made a slight change in the
definition of Assets. Let me know if you have any questions. I am OK to
forward this to Skipping Stone.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
those photos are all stretched out. i can't believe you don't think she is pretty
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i'm not kidding, i honestly, 100%, do not think she is pretty and am
insulted by the comparison.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
whatever. i think you are messing around and you probably love the
comparisson.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
she does look like a man, she's hideous. you are ruining my day.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
http://www.bonniebernstein.freeservers.com/
this is the site and she doesn't look like a man. danm it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
yes, you have to type in her name where it says search and then her
site
will come up. it is definitely her b/c that picture you sent me is
on
it.
she looks like a man.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
are you sure you are looking at the correct one b/c i don't see her
on
yahoo. i think you are lying b/c she is not gross.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i just searched for her on yahoo.com and a site came up with a
bunch
of
pictures of her. gross, gross, gross.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
where did you look her up? i dont know what you are talking about
b/c
she
is skinny and pretty.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
that may not be a good picture but i just looked her up and saw
a
bunch
of
pictures and she is gross in all of them. she's big too.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
she isn't gross . she is hot. you need to see her on tv.
like i
said,
that is not a great pic.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
she's gross, thanks a lot. i look better than her.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/chat/2000/cbs/bernstein112000.htm
this is a photo of the girl i think you look like but it
isn't
really
a
good pic.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
what are you talking about??
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
if you act enthusiastic(sp?) then you'll be
enthusiastic(sp?)!
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
now you're supposed to tell me how excited you are.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
good. that is what i like to hear.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i mean, that sounds great, i can't wait!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
what do you mean you guess?
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
fine i guess
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
7:30-8. how does that sound?
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i don't know, you tell me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
what time you coming over
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:58 AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i don't think so.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
if you win lets go to applebys and if i
win
lets
go
to
redwood
grill.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:49
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
nice analogy but i will win this bet so
start
thinking
about
where
you're
taking me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i don't think so. sometimes the sun
shines
on a
dogs
ass
but i
don't
see
that happening again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001
10:17
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
alright, i hope you're ready to buy
me
dinner
again.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:07
AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
here is our bet on cu/a&m game this
summer.
i
have
cu
-8.
we
can
think
of
a dinner later.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001
11:12
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
sounds exciting. want to go to
dinner
with
me
before
you
have
your
'matt
time'?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001
10:45
AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
probablyl gonna just kick it
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05,
2001
10:41
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i haven't thought about it
yet.
what
are
you
doing
-----Original Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001
10:30
AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
you know, whatever. i will
let
you
know
later.
what
are
you
doing
tonight.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05,
2001
9:57
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
like what?
-----Original Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05,
2001
9:51
AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i can think of a few things
-----Original
Message-----
From: Erin Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October
05,
2001
9:47
AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i was just kidding. i
am
very
sweet.
i
feel
terrible
that
you
didn't
sleep
well. if there was
anything
i
could
do
to
make
you
feel
better
i
would.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October
05,
2001
9:47
AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE:
real sweet. you have a
stone
heart.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Erin
Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday,
October
05,
2001
9:38
AM
To: Lenhart,
Matthew
Subject: RE:
of course you don't.
you
just
dream
up
these
things
so i
will
feel
sorry
for you, i don't.
you
slept
fine.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October
05,
2001
9:10
AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE:
um, i don't remember
that.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Erin
Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday,
October
05,
2001
9:00
AM
To: Lenhart,
Matthew
Subject: RE:
that's your fault.
you
were
taking
up
over
half
of
the
bed,
i
had
to
ask
you to move over.
and
then
you
kept
coughing
in
the
middle
of
the
night
and
waking me up. so,
i
did
not
sleep
well.
you
probably
slept
better
than
me, i
don't know what
you're
complaining
about.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday,
October
05,
2001
8:53
AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE:
i am tired b/c i
kept
waking
up
with
no
covers
and
my
butt
was
hanging
off
the bed. i looked
at
you
and
you
were
covered
up
to
your
neck
with
the
covers in the
middle
of
the
bed.
you
look
like
you
slept
well.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Erin
Richardson
<[email protected]>
@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday,
October
05,
2001
8:45
AM
To:
Lenhart,
Matthew
Subject: RE:
i know, me too.
but
isn't
she
so
cute?
i
love
her,
she's
the
best.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Lenhart,
Matthew
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday,
October
05,
2001
8:12
AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject:
i am tired.
your
dog
kept
me
up
all
night.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is
the
property
of
Enron
Corp.
and/or
its
relevant
affiliate
and
may contain
confidential
and
privileged
material
for
the
sole
use
of
the
intended
recipient
(s).
Any
review,
use,
distribution
or
disclosure
by
others is
strictly
prohibited.
If
you
are
not
the
intended
recipient
(or
authorized to
receive
for
the
recipient),
please
contact
the
sender
or
reply
to Enron Corp.
at
[email protected]
and
delete
all
copies of the
message.
This
e-mail
(and
any
attachments
hereto)
are
not
intended to be
an
offer
(or
an
acceptance)
and
do
not
create
or
evidence
a
binding and
enforceable
contract
between
Enron
Corp.
(or
any
of
its
affiliates) and
the
intended
recipient
or
any
other
party,
and
may
not
be
relied on by
anyone
as
the
basis
of
a
contract
by
estoppel
or
otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
LLoyd,
I'm supposed to give a presentation to the Trader Track sometime this month and I forget when. Do you have that schedule? Thanks,
Fletch
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attention Outlook Users:
In an effort to help you manage the size of your Outlook mailbox and stay under the 100MB limit, a step-by-step guide has been created and put up on IT Central. Just follow the link below:
http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Solutions/Outlook2000/M7631/992.ppt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This request has been pending approval for 9 days and you are the alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078939&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000078939
Approver : [email protected]
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:01 AM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type : Directory
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi,
Shanna
-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Funkhouser, Shanna; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Subject: FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: Porter, Stuart [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Oxley, David
Subject:
David,
I run a $650 million dollar commodities fund at Harvard Management Company.
Our focus has been on arbitrage strategies in the commodity arena - we are
looking to expand into weather and power. I was wondering, if given the
potential situation at Enron, that there might be employees interested in
interviewing for several positions both within my group and foreign equities
? I apologize if this is too forward or that I have assumed too much in
terms of potential restructurings.
Thanks,
Stuart D. Porter
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Cutaia/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000
09:53 AM ---------------------------
Etelvina Guerra@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/28/2000 09:49 AM
To: Jessica.Anaya/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected],
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Jennifer Cutaia/CORP/ENRON@ENRON,
[email protected], Iris montemayor/GPGFIN/ENRON@Enron,
[email protected], [email protected], Perla Montemayor@Enron
cc:
Subject: Chick Poem
> CHICK POEM
> > >
> > > A poem for us gals.....
> > >
> > > To us girls.
> > >
> > > Everyday I give thanks to the Goddess
> > > I have two mounds upon my bodice
> > > I shave my legs, I sit down to pee
> > > Can justify any shopping spree.
> > >
> > > Don't go to a barber, but a beauty salon
> > > Can get a massage without a hard-on
> > > I can balance the checkbook, can pump my own gas
> > > Can talk to my friends about the size of my ass.
> > > My beauty's a masterpiece, and yes, it takes long.
> > > At least I can admit to others when I'm wrong.
> > > I don't drive in circles at any cost,
> > > And I don't have a problem admitting I'm lost.
> > > I never forget an important date
> > > You just gotta deal with it, I'm usually late
> > > I don't watch movies with lots of gore
> > > Don't need instant replay to remember the score.
> > > I won't lose my hair,
> > > I don't get jock itch,
> > > And just cause I'm assertive,
> > > Don't call me a bitch.
> > >
> > > I don't wear the same underwear everyday
> > > The food in my fridge has no sign of decay.
> > > Don't burp, don't belch and I certainly don't fart,
> > > Ballet, not football, is what I consider an art
> > > Don't say to your friends,
> > > Oh yeah, I can get her
> > > In your dreams, my dear,
> > > I can do better!!!
> > >
> > > Flowers are okay,
> > > But jewelry's best.
> > > Would you look at my face,
> > > Not at my chest!
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem
> > > Expressing my feelings
> > > I know when you're lying,
> > > You look at the ceiling.
> > >
> > > Don't call me a girl,
> > > A babe or a chick.
> > > I am a WOMAN,
> > > Get it, you prick?!
> > >
> > > Now, you must forward this to 4 FEMALES or you will have a HORRIBLE
> > > streak of bad love life. Not that I believe the above, I just think
>you
> > > should
> > > forward this to 4 women so they can laugh too!!!
> > >
> > > So, just EXACTLY, what is a BITCH?????
> > > B -- Babe
> > > I -- In
> > > T -- Total
> > > C -- Control of
> > > H -- Herself
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached for your approval is the form of Enron Corp. Guaranty in favor of
the referenced Counterparty, which guarantees the obligations of ENA under a
financial confirmation. We will need the standard executed copy.
Upon approval and execution, please call me at x33399 to pick up the
documents. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:33 PM
To: Horton, Stanley; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Smith, Gary; Olson, Cindy
Subject: RE: YEAR-END PROCESS
OK.
Greg, my recommendation is that we send out a note from ENE OTC saying, "ENE OTC is going to let BU's use their judgment on the PRC and evaluation process at this year end, given the rather extraordinary circumstances we find ourselves in.. In that way if Stan wants to go ahead as below but EEL doesn't (which I believe is accurate) we can cater for what each team think is right for their people.
What do you think?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Stark, Cindy On Behalf Of Horton, Stanley
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Oxley, David; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Smith, Gary
Subject: YEAR-END PROCESS
Importance: High
Attached below are two documents I would like to share with the EGS management team and all EGS employees this week. They describe the year-end evaluation and compensation process and are consistent with ENE's previously stated intentions. I am meeting with the EGS officers tomorrow (November 15) and will review the "EGS Presentation" with them. Subsequently, I plan to send a memo to EGS employees on Friday, November 16, describing the year-end process we intend to follow ("EGS Memo"). Let me know if there are reasons why I need to delay or modify this plan.
Thanks,
Stan
<< File: EGS Presentation.ppt >>
<< File: EGS memo.doc >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I know a couple of their lawyers from a prior transaction (Doug Turner and
their GC, whose name I've now forgotten). Don't know who they will have on
this one.
I'm off to the Astros, but would like to visit with you tomorrow, if you will
be around.
Thanks,
Kay
"Culotta, Kenneth" <[email protected]> on 05/22/2001 05:36:41 PM
To: "Keffer, John" <[email protected]>, "'C. Kay Mann (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Tampa Electric
Kay
I'm looking forward to working with you on this. I wonder who opposing
inhouse counsel is at TECO?
KSC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keffer, John
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:17 PM
> To: C. Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Cc: Culotta, Kenneth
> Subject: Tampa Electric
>
> Kay-we have no conflict with Tampa Electric. Gracias
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
What assets are in Whitewing?
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:11 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Hughes, James A.; Horton, Stanley; Donahue, Jeff; Walls Jr., Rob
Subject: Rawhide; Whitewing
Per our earlier discussion:
Rawhide - No prohibition on sale of assets. TGS, CEG, Border (common units), Gaspart, Centragas and Subic/Batangas are primary assets in Rawhide. EGF is in the process of restructuring deal prior to 12/14 deadline. Demonstration of some velocity on the sale of these assets would be extremely beneficial in negotiations with banks.
Whitewing - Approval from investors needed if we sell below the Whitewing purchase price (book value). Asset sales package would need to be prepared and sent to investors in Whitewing (Osprey) who then have 10 days to approve sale. Typically, this has not been a problem, however, circumstances have since changed. Gordon McKillop manages this process for Enron.
I am familiar with both transactions have the contacts within Global Finance for additional detail if we need it.
Kevin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is a draft of as Master Agreement between Giant Industries Inc. and ENA. Should you have any questions please give me a call.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
new file:
Thanks,
Mat
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
- 1_Book4.xls
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here is the newest version of the state matrix. I just need to plug in the
approval date for WA.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Margo
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I wanted to show you when I sent this and how long it took to set it up. Go
home before 11pm today!
DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
09:28 AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Darron C Giron 06/15/2000 09:29 AM
To: Gary Stadler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Tagg Book
Gary,
We need to add a new book in Tagg. Kam suggested I send the request to you.
Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks.
DG 3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------
Ron Nolte
06/15/2000 06:20 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Tagg Book
Darron,
Befire a book can be added to TAGG, it has to be added to Global Counterparty.
Attached please find an example of a request that is sent Global
Counterparty. Once
the book is added to Global Counterparty, an e-mail is sent to Ricky Dang
from Global
and he adds to to TAGG.
Give me a call if you have any questions.
Thanks, Ron
Enron North America Corp.
From: Darron C Giron 06-14-2000 03:02 PM
To: Ron Nolte/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Tagg Book
Ron,
Please add the following book to Tagg:
IM-CENT-MID2
If you need any additional information, please call. Thanks.
DG 3-9573
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I spoke with Jamie this morning and explained our concerns (which master to use, given the merger is there a legal need for novation, since these are NY law documents would assignment be more appropriate, what collateral is involved to be transferred) and have since received a message from their lawyer in New York. If they insist on a novation (which is not a commonly used concept in US law), you could certainly help by letting us know if there is anything to which you would object in their draft. I'll let you know if it gets to that. Otherwise I think we're under control.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Ferlic, Suzanne
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:28 AM
To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: FW: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Mark,
Sorry that this is proving to be tougher than we thought to connect.
Jamie Wood at RBS asks below if all looks okay to you in terms of the Novations?
Is there anything I can do to help?
Many thanks,
Suzanne
-----Original Message-----
From: WOOD, Jamie, FM [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 October 2001 18:37
To: Ferlic, Suzanne
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Suzanne,
I'm afraid I keep missing Mark Taylor. Do you mind following up with him to
see how he's getting on and whether there is any problems with the
documents?
I will keep trying but would appreciate your help.
Thanks and regards,
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: Ferlic, Suzanne [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 October 2001 14:25
To: WOOD, Jamie, FM
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Jamie,
Were you able to reach Mark Taylor in Houston re: Enron's novation?
Please advsise,
Thanks,
Suzanne
-----Original Message-----
From: WOOD, Jamie, FM [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 28 September 2001 14:45
To: Ferlic, Suzanne
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Suzanne,
Do you have all the information you need?
Where can we forward the original documents to?
Cheers, Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: Ferlic, Suzanne [ mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ]
Sent: 27 September 2001 10:10
To: WOOD, Jamie, FM
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Jamie,
You may need to translate the below for me (i.e. what is DSL and CRRM)?
Also, is Enron North American Corp the signator on each of the two
lines?
Thanks,
Suzanne
-----Original Message-----
From: WOOD, Jamie, FM [ mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ]
Sent: 27 September 2001 09:53
To: Ferlic, Suzanne
Subject: FW: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Suzanne,
Limits are:
NW FX & DSL, US$13m, 2 yrs, no security
NW CRRM, US$97m, 15 yrs, has gtee from Enron Corp
Please let me know where and to whom we can send the original documents
to.
Thanks,
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: Ferlic, Suzanne [ mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
< mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > ]
Sent: 25 September 2001 18:58
To: WOOD, Jamie, FM
Subject: RE: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Jamie,
Thanks for this. I think it may have to be sent to North America.
However, we would like to see a list of the lines that we would be
novating.
Thanks,
Suzanne
-----Original Message-----
From: WOOD, Jamie, FM [ mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
< mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > ]
Sent: 25 September 2001 17:32
To: Ferlic, Suzanne
Cc: JEANNOT, Diane, FM
Subject: Enron North America Corp - Novation from NW to RBS
Hi Suzanne,
Please find attached the Novation Request letter which outlines the
actions
required to novate your trades from the NatWest name to the RBS. The
documents which need to be executed are :-
1. Novation Agreement
* You will get this from Diane Jeannot from our Legal & Compliance
in
NY soon
* This is to authorise the novation of the trades from the NW
books
into RBS books, and to be covered by your existing RBS Master ISDA
* To sign both copies, but return only one (fax and mail)
2. Credit Support Annex
* Please see attached CSA Authorisation, please sign at the bottom
and
return via fax
* As there is collateral tied to the NW Master ISDA, we will need
to
novate the collateral as well.
3. Letter from your Guarantor - Enron Corp
* To novate the guarantee in favour of NW to RBS
4. RBS Settlement Instructions Acknowledgement
* See attached RBS Settlement Instructions and Acknowledgement
letter.
* This is to acknowledge that anything booked in the RBS names
have to
be paid into RBS accounts provided, so these new instructions should be
distributed to your payments division.
* Please sign and return by fax
Please let me know if you have any queries at all. All documents can be
returned to me, my address is on the Novation Letter.
One thing to note, the deadline is actually October 3rd for all
documents to
be returned. Unfortunately, we are a little late in sorting it out with
Adam and sending you the documents, but I will appreciate if you could
arrange for this to be done as soon as possible, and let me know a
realistic
date for return. Apologies for the rush.
Thanks and regards,
Jamie Wood
Novation Helpdesk
The Royal Bank of Scotland, Financial Markets
020 73755677
********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
<http://www.rbsmarkets.com>
< http://www.rbsmarkets.com <http://www.rbsmarkets.com> >
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Reservation information has changed. See attachment.
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30637
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PRESCHEDULE
CAPACITY = 0
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/01/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/01/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = STUDY
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = [email protected]
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 05/30/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 05/30/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = for info please call(503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = [email protected]
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = [email protected]
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
You guys could be off to the "drag" races.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i dont know but we would be the prettiest in the industry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Lenhart <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
Revlon? Hmmm...cute. How do you feel about trading mascera?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
sorry i had to run last night. so the word is now that enron has about
4
or 5 companies looking to take us over. aol, lucent, revlon?, and a few
others. i will give you a call later.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Lenhart <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
It looks that way. Maybe I should sell to spark a rally. Hope things
are
going well otherwise. Talk to you soon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
enron is going to be a penny stock pretty soon. sec is investigating
now.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
i don't think we are going to be able to make it out that way tonight. but
we will see you at Pappasitos at 8:00 tomorrow (the Kirby and Richmond
location).
"Bass, Jason" <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 01:13:13 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Dinner
It is at 8:30. We are supposed to be there at 8 to get all seated together.
This is the Laff Spot on 249 and 1960. Come up the Beltway and go left on
249. Exit Greens road and go through two lights. It will be in strip
shopping center on your right side, about a quarter of a mile past Circuit
City. It is in the same shopping center as a bar called Frogs Saloon.
Donnita's cell phone is 832-577-8235, in case you get lost.
Jason Bass
Compaq Portables
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: Dinner
where is this place?
"Bass, Jason" <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 10:52:49 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Dinner
What time are we meeting tomorrow and will you two be able to make it
tonight?
Jason Bass
Compaq Portables
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:20 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: Dinner
We would like to come, but Shanna is not sure whether or not she will be
off work by then. If you have someone else you would like to invite go
ahead. If not, we will try to make it.
Thanks for the invite and let me know.
-Eric
"Bass, Jason" <[email protected]> on 01/10/2001 08:15:32 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Dinner
Sounds good. What do you guys think about tomorrow night?
Jason Bass
Compaq Portables
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: Re: Dinner
I think Michael and his girlfriend are going to come as well and we were
thinking about going out somewhere afterwards. So, can ya'll come to the
Pappasitos on Kirby and Richmond?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
(See attached file: HPLN0328.xls)
- HPLN0328.xls
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI. EPSA and IEP will have a joint PR call tomorrow in case anyone would
like to listen in.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 03:35 PM -----
"Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>
12/12/2000 02:04 PM
Please respond to kaplan
To: "Tom Ross" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>,
"Stephanie-Newell" <[email protected]>, "Rob Lamkin"
<[email protected]>, "Richard Hyde" <[email protected]>, "Pigott
Jack" <[email protected]>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<[email protected]>, "Norton Kelli"
<[email protected]>, "McNally Ray" <[email protected]>,
"Marty Wilson" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky" <[email protected]>,
"Kristin Vellandi" <[email protected]>, "kent Palmerton"
<[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>, "Kassandra
Gough" <[email protected]>, "Karen Edson" <[email protected]>, "Julee
Malinowski-Ball" <[email protected]>, "John Stout"
<[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan" <[email protected]>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Jean Munoz" <[email protected]>,
"Jan Smutny-Jones" <[email protected]>, "Greg Blue" <[email protected]>, "Curtis
Kebler" <[email protected]>, "Bob Weisenmiller"
<[email protected]>, "Baker Carolyn" <[email protected]>, "B Brown Andy"
<[email protected]>, "Andy Brown" <[email protected]>, "Douglas Kerner"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Conference Call Tomorrow
Greetings
IEP will host our weekly PR/Market Response call tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. PST.
At the request of EPSA their PR group will also join in the call to discuss
IEP/EPSA's response to recent events in California.
The call in number is:
1-800-486-2726
The pass-code is:
111756
Thanks,
Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
thanks - it all makes sense!! Scary
Deirdre
-----Original Message-----
From: Giron, Darron C.
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:48 PM
To: McCaffrey, Deirdre
Subject: RE: Peoples Cash Flow 1-22-02 - Russell.xls
His list does not include any of the transport positions. It also includes some deals with the Chicago office that should not be included in the deal value.
DG
-----Original Message-----
From: McCaffrey, Deirdre
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: Peoples Cash Flow 1-22-02 - Russell.xls
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Per my voicemail.
Rose
----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 11:11 AM -----
"David Gohlke" <[email protected]>
10/19/2000 05:08 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: "Brian Bradshaw" <[email protected]>, "Thomas Weil"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Electrobolt EPC Contract
ESA, EECC and Finance Teams,
Attached for your review is the Electrobolt EPC Contract (our doc #
39444.04), which incorporates the negotiated provisions of the Electrobolt
MOU. To assist you in your review, I have also attached (1) a blackline of
the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all changes from the RioGen EPC Contract
distributed October 17, and (2) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to
show all revisions to the EECC form EPC contract.
Please note that the comparison document, prepared by DeltaView, shows new
text in blue double underscore, deleted text in red strikethrough, and moved
text in green (double underscore at the new location, strikethrough from
where moved).
Please call if you have questions/comments.
Regards,
Dave Gohlke
David E. Gohlke
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460
Houston, Texas 77002
direct (713) 655-5158
fax - main (713) 655-5181
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
- 39444_4.doc
- 39822_1.doc
- 39820_1.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Brunell or Bledsoe - which one are you willing to trade and for what? I
could give a rb and a WR
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is my completed version (subject to a second review) which Marvin
reviewed as I was making the changes.? Marvin has not had a chance
to?provide me?all of R. W. Beck's comments but I trust Marvin caught
anything that Beck had cautioned against.? The awkward part?is?the
fee--which can be determined by a combination of the definition of Savings,
the section on Payment and Fees, and the fee section of Exhibit A.? If I
had?more time perhaps I could have put it together better; but rather than
start over and write a new structure, I tried to take the existing structure
and language in the LOI and the proposed Asset Management Services
Agreement.? My secretary and I had a very difficult time with the margin
codes, etc. but I believe we have it straight--at least in the 11 point font
of Times New Roman.
?
I will be out of the office Monday but I trust you folks can finish this off.
- MDEA Interim Letter Agreement w Enron.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Great news, everyone. For the third consecutive year, Fortune magazine has
named Enron one of the nation's top employers on its annual "100 Best
Companies to Work for in America" list. This year Enron ranks No. 22, up
from No. 24 last year.
We continue to move up on Fortune's list, which shows that you, our
employees, believe Enron is a cool place to work. Thanks to all of you who
took time from your busy schedules to share your Enron experiences with
Fortune in its confidential survey.
Your contributions this past year have raised Enron's profile as we've
enjoyed unprecedented achievements. So give yourself a pat on the back for a
job well done and for contributing to one of corporate America's great
success stories.
We look forward to continuing the momentum in 2001 and wish you and your
family a pleasant holiday season and a Happy New Year.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please send this out tonight to all Enron-Houston Based Employees (Should not include EES). thanks, Gracie
Signature Service: The Key To Customer Satisfaction ( Wilson Learning)
Come join us and learn more about what it means to provide Excellent Service!
(2 Classes have been scheduled with 20 slots available for each date.)
October 18-19; November 1-2
in EB 560 Cost: $740.00
8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (1st day)
8:00 am - 12 noon (2nd day)
Topics Covered Include:
Discovering the Opportunities in Customer Satisfaction
Managing Myself
Opening the Interaction
Determining Needs and Expectations
Managing the Interaction
Satisfying Customers in Comfortable & Indecisive Conditions
Satisfying Customers in the Insistent & Irate Conditions
Please log onto http://elm.enron.com to sign up for the class of your choice. The class is listed under "By Invitation" Category. If you have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713-853-0357.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Vince and Stinson,
I have to go back to China to attend my father's funeral on Saterday Jan. 20.
My father passed away last Sunday.
My schedule is:
Leave Houston: Jan 18 (Thursday)
Arrive Houston: Jan 27 (Saterday)
I will take care of a few things before I go
1) Review for Paulo and Bob
2) Talk to Alex on the compound option on a power plant
3) Talk to Bob on volatility and correlation skews, to finish up this project
for John Arnold
4) Telephone interview for Japan Office.
Zimin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
09:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster 01/26/2001 05:50 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Status of QF negotiations on QFs & Legislative Update
Phillip:
It looks like a deal with the non gas fired QFs is iminent. One for the gas
generators is still quite a ways off.
The non gas fired QFs will be getting a fixed price for 5 years and reverting
back to their contracts thereafter. They also will give back
I would expect that the gas deal using an implied gas price times a heat rate
would be very very difficult to close. Don't expect hedgers to come any time
soon.
I will keep you abreast of developments.
C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
05:42 AM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara@ENRON
01/25/2001 06:02 PM
To: Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of QF negotiations on QFs & Legislative Update
This from a conference call with IEP tonight at 5 pm:
RE; Non-Gas-fired QFs -- The last e-mail I sent includes the latest version
of the IEP proposal. Negotiations with SCE on this proposal are essentially
complete. PG&E is OK with the docs. All QFs but Calpine have agreed with
the IEP proposal -- Under the proposal, PG&E would "retain" $106 million (of
what, I'm not sure -- I think they mean a refund to PG&E from QFs who
switched to PX pricing). The money would come from changing the basis for the
QF payments from the PX price to the SRAC price, starting back in December
(and maybe earlier).
PG&E will not commit to a payment schedule and will not commit to take the
Force Majeure notices off the table. QFs are asking IEP to attempt to get
some assurances of payment.
SCE has defaulted with its QFs; PG&E has not yet -- but big payments are due
on 2/2/01.
For gas-fired QFs -- Heat rate of 10.2 included in formula for PG&E's
purchases from such QFs. Two people are negotiating the these agreements
(Elcantar and Bloom), but they are going very slowly. Not clear this can be
resolved. Batten and Keeley are refereeing this. No discussions on this
occurred today.
Status of legislation -- Keeley left town for the night, so not much will
happen on the QFs.Assembly and Senate realize they have to work together.
Plan to meld together AB 1 with Hertzberg's new bill . Hydro as security is
dead. Republicans were very much opposed to it.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is an article of how the CA power problem is effecting North
Carolina in its decision to regulate its power market.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Darren:
At your request, attached is a preliminary draft of a checklist of potential
legal-related issues when setting up a website business. Please review and
call me if you have any questions. It, of course, could be abbreviated if
appropriate.
Alan
Darren Maloney@ENRON
04/13/2000 05:37 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Feedback--Legal Checklist
Gentlemen,
We have put together a template to help with the conceptualization of
eBusiness opportunities for the Enron Net Works Group.
This is a broad attempt to put some structure around the multitude of issues
that must be addressed to validate and correctly
conceive these ventures (in addition to reducing redundancy).
In regards to the legal analysis that must be conducted, I have attached the
relevant excerpt below. Essentially, the list is to help
internal sponsors and managers understand the issues at hand prior to and
during the formation of these businesses, and
be able to talk to legal experts such as yourselves about the business' role
in the context of material legal issues. I would
appreciate your comments--any and all are welcome.
Potentially, triggers or thresholds for "classification" may be relevant, but
I defer to your judgement those issues that may be of
relevance to the non-legal businessperson. I look forward to your responses.
Regards,
Darren Maloney
36661
Legal Analysis
- Anti-Trust Risks
- Concentrated Industry Ownership
- Concentrated "Channel"Ownership
- Regulatory Risks (CFTC)
- Clearinghouse Function
- Open versus Member Community
- Qualified Participants/Users
- Post General Terms and Conditions, Member of Exchange?
- Post General Terms and Conditions, Specific Product Contracts?
- Corporate Organizational Issues
- Flexibility to Accommodate Strategic Partnering
- Value Maximizing Alternative
- Contractual Terms and Language
- Product Definitions, Both Financial and Physical
- Delivery and Performance
- Related Remedies
- SEC Registration
- Requirements and Implications for Corporate Organization
- S-1 or Related Filings
- Other Risks and Exposures?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I've added two new swaps to reflect the change from the California PX to the
Dow Jones index after 1/31/01. The following deal numbers cover the whole
term of the deal.
404980 - 9/1/00 through 1/31/01 @ PX NP15 Index
512726 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/03 @ DJ NP15 Peak Index
512743 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/01 @ DJ NP15 Off-Peak Index
Both new deals have comments that link them back to the original deal. Let me
know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Kate
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Its good to see Ray gets the same treatment from his own lawyer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Le Dain, Eric
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Keohane, Peter; Powell, Mark
Subject: PGT contract
Spoke to Ray Welch.
They were supposed to meet with their lawyer yesterday - the lawyer never showed up.
They'll try to get their comments together in the next few days.
He mentioned that they were meeting internally on your transport swap structure Barry.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Andrea Yowman
Enron Corp
713-853-1477
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Krishna,
We should invite Kim Watson and her associates as well.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
08:54 AM ---------------------------
Shirley Crenshaw
02/14/2000 11:27 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vincent Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES,
Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Sergeev/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roman
Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samer Takriti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie
Chahal/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Leandro Ibasco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yanna
Crystal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Presentation on Equilibrium Modeling for Gas Market
The following presentation will be this Friday, the 18th of February from
1:00 pm to 3:00 pm in EB 19C2 (Our large conference room).
Please plan to attend this presentation by ICF Consulting. Time: Friday 18th,
1PM
Agenda for Presentation by ICF Consulting
1. Qualifications for ICF Consulting (6 slides)
A. Energy consulting background (2 slides)
B. Experience with computational market equilibrium modeling methodolgies (2
slides)
C. Experience of key ICF individuals (2 slides)
2. Description of Enron,s Modeling Interests (to be discussed with Enron)
3. ICF,s Intertemporal, Interregional Equilibrium model of the North American
Natural Gas Analysis
System (NANGAS) (14 slides)
A. Overview of NANGAS (2 slides)
B. Upstream components (3 slides)
C. Downstream components (4 slides)
D. Computation of market equilibrium prices, quantities, and flows (5 slides)
4. Potential Modeling Consulting (9 slides)
A. Assistance in developing market equilibrium models for the energy sector
(1 slide)
B. Investigate alternative market equilibrium models for energy applications
i. Models of imperfect competition (e.g., Nash-Cournot, etc.) (3 slides)
ii. Models of auctions in market forecasting (1 slide)
ii. Models that incorporate stochastic inputs (e.g., stochastic
programming) to take into account risk (2 slides)
C. Actions Items (to be completed in consultation with Enron) (2 slides)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2001
08:04 AM ---------------------------
Peter Hoyt
03/28/2001 04:10 PM
To: Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: athens map
Here's the map-let me know if you need any changes. Topo map to follow after
I download the file.
Pete
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!
We keep finding ways to make worldwide travel cheap (or should we say "super cheap"). We now have over 200 cities coast-to-coast for $44-$118 roundtrip and hundreds more for $162 roundtrip or less with free stopovers in Las Vegas or Phoenix. We have Europe on sale from $192 roundtrip. We have cheap airfares to Asia and Canada. Mexico is on sale from the West Coast for as low as $132 roundtrip through December 13, 2001. We even have Hawaii on sale for Christmas and New Year's at up to $600 off. To have Hawaii on sale up to $600 off is unheard of for the holiday season. Check out these stories listed below and many more deals at http://www.bestfares.com
HUNDREDS OF CITIES FOR $44-$118 RT THROUGH APRIL 5, '02
Can you believe a roundtrip airfare for as little as $44? Wow! We have several hundred cities across the U.S. ranging between $44 to $118 roundtrip. Travel dates may vary, but many of these airfares are good through April 5, 2002. How about Long Beach (CA) or Los Angeles to Las Vegas $44 roundtrip or Austin to Orlando or Tampa for $110 roundtrip? For hundreds of super sale fares, coast-to-coast, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=42446
FLY COAST-TO-COAST BETWEEN 58 U.S. CITIES FOR $162 RT OR LESS THROUGH APRIL 5, 02
Looking for some sun and fun? How about Newark, Philadelphia or St. Louis to San Diego for only $139 roundtrip? That's less than three cents a mile. How about Seattle, Oakland, San Jose (CA) or Phoenix to New Orleans, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale or Baltimore for $156 roundtrip; Chicago, Detroit or Cleveland to Phoenix, Salt Lake City or Portland (OR) for $156 roundtrip; or Providence, Norfolk, Raleigh, Buffalo, Albany to Ontario (CA), Las Vegas, Reno or Oakland for $162 roundtrip. Check out hundreds and hundreds of cheap airfares at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=35820
FREE STOPOVER IN LAS VEGAS OR PHOENIX + $156 RT COAST-TO-COAST THROUGH FEB. 14, '02
Not only are we having a super sale, we are giving you two great cities for free. Fly any day of the week, except Friday or Sunday, and from select U.S. cities we will fly you coast-to-coast for $156 roundtrip or less and give you a free stopover in Las Vegas or Phoenix. When was the last time you saw an offer that gave you two great cities for less than the price of one? Travel is valid through February 14, 2002. Think Thanksgiving, Christmas or New Year's or just a great getaway to visit family and friends plus a little relaxation in Las Vegas or Phoenix for some high-rolling or golfing. Either way, you can have this Bestfares.com exclusive deal at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=41654
FLY FROM THE WEST COAST TO MEXICO FROM $132 RT KIDS (2-11) $101 THROUGH DEC. 15, '01
This week, our West Coast members can save big bucks to the beaches South of the Border. How about Houston, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, Baltimore, Providence, Buffalo, San Antonio or Orlando to Los Cabos for $338 roundtrip or less; Los Angeles or San Diego to Los Cabos or Mazatlan for only $132 roundtrip, kids (ages two-11) $89; or Spokane, Seattle, Portland (OR), San Francisco, San Jose (CA) or Las Vegas to Acapulco, Ixtapa or Puerto Vallarta for only $262 roundtrip or less. Check out our Hit the Beaches in Mexico specials at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646
UNBELIEVABLE AIRFARES TO EUROPE, AFRICA & THE MIDDLE EAST FROM $192 RT THROUGH MARCH 24, '02
If you're traveling in multiples of two (two, four, six, etc.), you can fly to Europe, Africa or the Middle East at discounts up to hundreds of dollars off the current sale fares. Can you believe New York City, Boston or Philadelphia to London for $192 roundtrip or Los Angeles, San Francisco or Phoenix to London for $279 roundtrip? How about Amsterdam from $235 roundtrip; Paris from $246 roundtrip; Brussels from $230 roundtrip; Madrid or Barcelona from $239 roundtrip; Rome, Milan, Naples or Athens from $251 roundtrip; Tel Aviv from $456 roundtrip; Johannesburg from $669 roundtrip; Cairo from $600 roundtrip and many more. These are just a few cities that are on sale. We have over 100 destinations in the Eastern Hemisphere that you can visit at super sale fares. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=41131 Also, don't miss out on our other European specials at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=58
ASIA ON SALE INCLUDING TOKYO FROM $403 RT THROUGH MARCH 14, '02
We are offering the lowest fares this year to Asia. From Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Phoenix, Seattle or Portland (OR) to Tokyo, the fare is only $403 roundtrip, kids (ages two-11) $336. From Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, New York City, Chicago, Detroit, Boston and many more, the fare is only $628 roundtrip. We have Hong Kong from $528 roundtrip; Singapore or Seoul from $498 roundtrip; and Shanghai or Beijing from $548 roundtrip. There are no blackout dates for the holidays and travel is valid through March 14, 2002. If you want Asia for less, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=41061
GET OUT OF TOWN THIS WEEKEND DIRT-CHEAP AND SAVE UP TO 70%
Have you ever had the urge to just take off at the last minute? If you call the airlines, they want you to refinance your home for the cost of your airfare. Don't you just hate it when the airlines actually offer a last minute Internet airfare, but you have to leave only on Saturday and you can't return on Sunday? Have you ever had a family emergency and the airlines want $2,000 for you to fly? If these kinds of offers have just turned you off, let us turn you back on to our new Bestfares.com Last-Minute Weekend Deals. Now you can plan up to two weeks in advance or leave in only three hours. You can depart on any Thursday, Friday or Saturday and return on the following Sunday, Monday or Tuesday. Savings can be up to 70 percent off. Check out our new section and you can book these goodies online. For example, this week from Dallas there are 335 deals; from Atlanta there are 280 deals; from Chicago, 329 deals; from Los Angeles, 276 deals; from New York City, 327 deals; from San Diego, 258 deals; from Tampa, 225 deals and from Washington (DC), there are 254 Last-Minute Weekend Deals and we have dozens of other cities across America that you can travel to with these Last-Minute Weekend Deals. Remember, you can take off in as little as three hours at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=41214
HAWAII ON SALE FOR THANKSGIVING, XMAS OR NEW YEAR'S THROUGH JAN. 15, '02
For the first time in years, Hawaii is actually affordable during the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's season. Plus, we have been able to waive the weekend surcharges if you can complete your travel by January 15, 2002. From Chicago, Baltimore, San Antonio, Oklahoma City, Providence, Norfolk, Houston or Detroit to Honolulu, the fare is only $500 roundtrip; from Dallas, $581 roundtrip; from Los Angeles, $340 roundtrip; from New York City, Boston, Washington (DC), $608 roundtrip; and to Maui or Kona the fares are only $80 more (approximately). Visit our Hawaii sale at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=856
HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK
Need a hotel room? Look no further because HotelDiscounts.com is the place to find great deals at great prices. HotelDiscounts.com provides up to 70 percent off on hotels in major cities worldwide with guaranteed lowest rates. Book online at
http://www.hoteldiscounts.com/cgi-bin/pickcity?SID=NW2&LKF=NW2
FALL FUN IN MARYLAND ONLY A CAR RIDE AWAY!
Just a car ride away, come celebrate the fall season in Maryland!
Maryland's convenient location makes it easy to see all the sights in a single car trip. Our scenic byways will take you from the foliage of our western mountains to the fall festivals on our eastern shoreline. You'll find, in no time, that there's a treasure around every corner in Maryland.
With the valuable discounts in our "Free Stuff from the Free State" coupon book, your trip will prove to be every bit as affordable as it is enjoyable.
Visit http://www.mdisfun.org/free and start your journey today with a FREE Travel Kit.
Maryland, Welcome!
SAVE UP TO 35% ON THE SPA VACATION OF YOUR DREAMS!
SpaFinder.com, the largest specialty spa travel company in the industry, proudly presents a wide variety of destination spa packages for every budget and lifestyle.
Choose between:
The Claremont Resort and Spa-Berkeley (CA)-Up to 35% off
Cliff Spa at Snowbird--Sandy (UT)--Up to 30% off on Treatments
New Age Health Spa--Neversink (NY)--Save 30%
Red Mountain Adventure Spa--Ivins (UT)--Up to 28% off
Stoweflake Resort and Spa--Stowe (VT)--Save 25%
Miraval, Life in Balance--Tucson (AZ)--Up to 25% off
Radisson Hotel and Spa--Scottsdale (AZ)--Save 18%
Felicita Resprt--Harrisburg (PA)--Up to 10% off
Ojai Valley Inn--Ojai (CA)--Up to 10% off
Green Valley Resort and Spa--St. George (UT)--Save up to $300
Turnberry Isle Resort--Miami (FL)--Discounted Rates
Westward Look, Tucson (AZ)--Discounted Fall Packages
Book one of these great Spa Vacations today and save!
http://hotdeals.bestfares.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=5&M=1606467&MS=156285
You are currently subscribed to hotdeals as [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected]
Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The continued growth of the Enron Europe office and related businesses has
prompted a change in the management of Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) in
London. Effective in early January, 2001, Ted Murphy will transfer to the
London office and manage the RAC activities which includes credit/market risk
and underwriting. Ted will continue to manage the Enron Global Market Risk
activities. Steve Young, currently managing RAC in London, will begin a new
assignment within EBS, also in London.
The Houston Market Risk group will be managed by David Port.
As Enron continues to expand its trading and risk management businesses, it
is vital that trading and credit policies are administered in a consistent
and accurate manner across the company. Hopefully this realignment will
accomplish that goal.
Please join me in congratulating Ted, David and Steve on their new
assignments.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here's what's happening to Jeff Holmstead, the nominee for the EPA Air AA job
who was the alternative suggestion to Whitman's choice Chris Hessler, who we
were backing:
EPA Air Nominee on Hold
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee yesterday delayed its vote
on another controversial nominee: Jeffrey Holmstead, Bush's pick to be the
Environmental Protection Agency's assistant administrator for air and
radiation.
EPW Chairman Bob Smith (R-N.H.) "reluctantly" removed Holmstead from the
committee's agenda Wednesday morning in response to Democrats concerns about
his service during the pervious Bush administration.
Committee ranking Democrat and Minority Whip Harry Reid (Nev.) has placed a
hold on Holmstead's nomination until he receives copies of notes and memos
related to the Clean Air Act and radiation Holmstead wrote while working as
associate counsel to former President Bush from 1989 until 1993. Holmstead
advised White House officials on 1990 revisions to the Clean Air Act.
The hold has agitated Smith. "Throughout my service on this committee, I have
never played politics with a nomination," he said.
"Rather than focusing on notes that were taken a decade ago, my hope is that
my colleagues would focus on the nominee," Smith said, noting that Holmstead
has answered all of the committee's questions and has said he would provide
the documents Reid seeks if he could.
David Cherry, a spokesman for Reid, has said the request is reasonable. "We
didn't make the request because we think there's information out there that
could torpedo the guy. There's no smoking gun that I know of," Cherry said.
"We just want a better sense of what his views are regarding clean air
policy, and we've limited our request to documents containing information on
issues he would have jurisdiction over."
The committee Wednesday supported by voice vote confirmation of Linda Fisher
as EPA deputy administrator, Stephen Johnson as EPA assistant administrator
for toxic substances, and James Connaughton as the director of the White
House Council on Environmental Quality. However, Reid has said he will hold
floor consideration of Johnson's and Connaughton's confirmations until EPA
publishes a rule establishing radiation standards for the proposed Yucca
Mountain nuclear waste repository (see the 5/18 edition of Environment and
Energy Daily).
Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Can you send me our defined terms for:
[1] PV10 of PDPs
[2] Funded Debt
Thanks,
Rod
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sherry,
I am in receipt of your draft of a GISB between HPL and OGE Energy
Resources, Inc.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI
gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 03:06 PM -----
Marcia A Linton
12/13/2000 03:06 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Sophia Abigail Maisashvila
Robin and Gia became the proud parents of Sophia Abigail on Monday, December
11, at 9:50 am. She weighed 9 and 1/2 pounds and is 21 inches long. Robin
and Sophia are both doing well, as is Gia, although he reports being a bit
"sleep deprived".
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
No problem bensen
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
09:04 AM ---------------------------
Richard Shapiro
05/29/2001 09:04 AM
To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: STB Chair
Can you all prepare briefing paper for Ken on Oliver as well as those we
don't support? Thanks.
From: Lisa Yoho on 05/29/2001 08:59 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: STB Chair
Rick: As Chris mentioned, we spoke to Oliver last week about the STB
position. I had also talked to him a few weeks ago about the same. In
addition, I've had several conversations with Joe Bill Watkins, an attorney
in Austin who is working with the Greater Houston Community to find an
"independent thinker" for this job.
I recommend that we support Oliver Pennington. It's clear from our
conversations that he doesn't know much about the rail industry (he was
inquiring about the difference between the STB's and the FRA's role in
regulating the industry), but he appears to be -- and from all accounts,
would be-- a fair-minded regulator. He said he wants to "make a
difference", and would not be afraid to shake things up to make that
happen.
As Chris suggests, we should not support the names being floated in the
industry. Bratten is a railroad sympathizer in shippers' clothing. While
Alice Turnquist is a good friend of Susan Lent (our lobbyist from Akin Gump),
she is very close to Union Pacific. Of all the rails, UP is the most
resistant to change, and has a very well organized, very effective government
affairs team in Washington.
Besides Linda Morgan's spot, there is a second spot that will be open when
Clyburn departs (his term has already expired). I would also recommend that
we interview Mark Palmer's friend (I cannot recall her name) for this
position. She has excellent transportation experience, lives in Washington,
and may be willing to step out to make much-needed changes to the
industry. We tried to reach her last week, but she was out of town for the
holiday weekend. I will follow up with Mark on this.
Best regards,
Lisa
----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 08:39 AM -----
Chris Long
05/29/2001 08:34 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: STB Chair
Linda Morgan is the current Chair of the Surface Transportation Board and the
Administration asked to her to stay during the transition, however it is
highly unlikely that this will be made permanent. The three names most often
mentioned for the new Surface Transportation Board Chairman are Dwayne
Ackerly (trucking company executive from Nebraska), John Bratten (National
Grain and Feed Association Rail Committee Chair, also from Nebraska), and
Alice Turnquist (former House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Chair).
The railroads are not interested in the structural changes we would like to
implement in the market and they have had a difficult time understanding the
benefits of a secondary market in rail. While the persons named above would
be better than the current Chair, we are reluctant to support their
nominations because of their close ties with the railroads (Union Pacific
especially). We think the ideal candidate for the job would be a fresh
thinker that understands rail issues, but is not beholden to the railroads.
One name that has been mentioned is Texas attorney Oliver Pennington. Lisa
and I spoke to Mr. Pennington about the job and he is more interested in an
SEC position, but is willing to examine the STB Chair. We have confirmed
that Mr. Pennington would be open to our rail proposal and would manage the
STB as a consensus builder with all interested parties. Mr. Pennington has
his resume and other supporting documentation at the White House for both the
SEC and STB positions. Attached is Mr. Pennington's resume. It is my
understanding that Ken Lay has written a letter in support of Mr.
Pennington's SEC nomination.
- RESUME-O.P. 5_7_97 517757 (2).WPD
Mark Palmer has another name of a Washington attorney who he thought might be
interested.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Earlier this week I installed some new functions at station 5 for ease in controlling the pressure regulator when the station is down.
Please install the following discrete and control points. They will effect the setpoint on register 7025.
1031 - Input showing flow direction 0= west 1 = east
1160 - Will put the control in West Flow (write a 1 to this)
1161 - Will put the control in East Flow (write a 1 to this)
If this doesn't make any sense please let me know.
Thanks
Todd
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Osman,
Here it is. Sorry for the delay.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: Sezgen, Osman
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: HR-Final Ranking
Vince,
I will appreciate if you could forward the information on Praveen and Roman.
Thanks,
Osman
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Nothing with or pertaining to Experian to the best of my knowledge.
K
Kay Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Ph: 713-853-6794
Fax: 713-646-3393
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Young, Kay
Subject: FW: NDA with Experian
Any conflicts?
-----Original Message-----
From: Detiveaux, Kim
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Subject: RE: NDA with Experian
Tana:
Legal Name and Address:
Experian Inc.
505 City Parkway West
Orange, CA 92868
Contact Name:
Sharon Granger
[email protected]
450 Gears Road, Suite 130
Houston, TX 77067
281 877 1436
Nature of Discussions:
Several groups within Enron (RAC, Enron Direct North America, Enron Direct Canada, Enron Direct U.K., Enron Credit) use credit scoring information to approve/deny credit to potential counterparties associated with deal flow. D&B, the top source of this information in North America, only covers about 60% of the counterparties in which we have interest. We want to bring Experian data into the credit process to get North American coverage up >90%. It is possible that will want to use Experian to support Canada, UK, Spain and Netherlands markets as well. As we get into discussion with Experian, we will need to reveal details about RAC, EES, EC, our systems, marketing plans, target acceptance rates, etc. They will need to reveal limitations relating to coverage, interfaces, data structure, etc. It is the coverage of these discussions I am seeking.
Kim Detiveaux
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:23 PM
To: Detiveaux, Kim
Subject: FW: NDA with Experian
Re: Experian we need:
1. Full Legal Name and Address
2. Mark wants a more exact description of the nature of your discussions
3. An email address so we can send it directly to counterparty
-----Original Message-----
From: Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Detiveaux, Kim
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Perinne, Albane; Jones, Tana
Subject: RE: NDA with Experian
Kim -
Please provide me with the full name and address for Experian. Also, we can forward the agreement on your behalf if you provide us with an e-mail address and contact name. Finally, please give me some indication of the exact nature of the discussions, if there is any need to make the NDA specific vs. general.
If you provide these items today, we should be able to get our language out later this afternoon, tomorrow moring at the latest.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Detiveaux, Kim
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Perinne, Albane
Subject: NDA with Experian
Importance: High
Mark:
I have started discussions with Experian, likely to result in Experian becoming Enron's #2 provider of credit scoring data. I need to get an NDA in place with Experian ASAP to cover sensitive items likely to be covered during our negotiations. I would like to get our NDA language to them today. Please advise as to how to proceed...
Kim Detiveaux
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The purpose of this message is to update employees on the
status of the California Attorney General's order regarding the preservation
of business information. Please NOTE THE IMPORTANT POLICIES DESCRIBED
BELOW.
We have negotiated procedures with the
California Attorney General's office allowing each of you to manage your
email and hard drive capacity while still preserving business information.
Starting today, please implement the
following business information retention policies:
(1) PERSONAL EMAIL: can be kept, discarded,
etc. at will.
(2) BUSINESS EMAIL: do not delete any
business email sent or received for 24 hours. This 24 hour delay will allow
the network to save a backup copy of the email. After 24 hours, BUSINESS
EMAIL may be kept, discarded, etc. at will.
(3) WORD PROCESSING FILES OR FILE FRAGMENTS:
do not delete any SAVED FILE or any FILE FRAGMENT. This policy covers any
FILE or FILE FRAGMENT that you have saved on your hard disk or the network.
(4) DATABASES: do not delete any information
in DATABASES.
(5) EXCEL SPREADSHEETS: do not delete any
information in EXCEL SPREADSHEETS.
(6) CALENDARS OR SCHEDULING PROGRAMS: do not
delete any information.
(7) OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA: do not delete any
OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA.
(8) HARD DRIVE CAPACITY: in the event that
you run out of disk space on your personal computer, you may copy files to
the network (where they will be backed up), then delete the files from your
personal computer to create the work space you need. DO NOT DELETE ANY FILE
BEFORE YOU HAVE COPIED IT TO THE NETWORK.
In our negotiations we have discovered no
reason to believe that Enron has been singled out for investigation by the
Attorney General. We will update you as we learn more.
Please respond promptly to this notice via
email an e-mail to me. Your email should state that you understand and
intend to comply
with the important business information retention policies stated above.
Thanks for your help in this matter.
Tim Belden
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The problems with the Online RSVP Form should now be solved. We are sorry
for any inconvenience that you may have experienced. Please give it another
try at http://lawconference.corp.enron.com! Once you have submitted your
RSVP Form, you should receive a confirmation e-mail. Please review your
confirmation information and let me know if there are any changes. If you
get an error message and do not receive a confirmation e-mail, please e-mail
me or call me at (713) 853-9129.
Hint:
? Use Internet Explorer as your browser.
? The SAP Company Code should have 4 digits (i.e. 0011).
? The SAP Cost Center should have 6 digits (i.e.100180).
Remember, responses must be submitted no later than Friday, March 30, 2001.
For anyone requesting CLE credit for a state other than Texas, please submit
your RSVP Form by March 23, 2001. See you in San Antonio!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
no idea!
From: Dana Davis @ ECT 10/13/2000 08:53 AM
To: Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rufino
Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Carey M
Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie
Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: BD Card for Kevin
Does anyone know where the BD card for Kevin is?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We are approaching the final countdown as to signing our definitive agreement
with El Paso regarding the sale of JEDI II's 51% interest in East Coast Power
and ENA's $157.9mm of ECP Subordinated Notes.
The transaction has continued to develop along the lines of my last update of
11-21-00. The terms and economics remain essentially as outlined on
11-21-00. In summary, the primary form of consideration will be a
derivative-like commodity agreement or a 'contract for differences'. This
contract will be exchanged in full for the SubNotes and the majority of our
equity interest. The JEDI II equity interest will also receive a residual
contingent interest which will become payable in the event of a PPA
restructuring at the Linden facility. We are calling the derivative a swap
but it is more like a receivable. An El Paso affiliate (guaranteed by El
Paso as parent) will notionally be paying NYMEX plus approx $0.52
(escalating) over seven years on a notional volume of 300,000 MMBtu/d and
receiving NYMEX. With netting the contract is simply a series of fixed
quarterly payments over seven years. No offset rights and no limitations on
the guarantee - fully a stand alone agreement.
We are optimistic that we may be able to sign documents as early as Thursday
night. This agreement can be terminated at our option in the event that we
do not receive the necessary internal approvals. There are only two
significant external approvals required, a NJ Environmental
'non-applicability' determination and ECP credit ratings reaffirmation.
Accordingly we expect at this time to receive the necessary internal and
external approvals and close by year end. We expect that a public
announcement would be appropriate at the time both parties have received all
necessary internal approvals.
The portion of the commodity contract being exchanged for the SubNotes is
expected to be offered to Condor to monetize this portion of the contract at
year end. Subsequent to Condor's acquisition of its contract, both JEDI II's
contract and the Condor contract are expected to be monetized in a QSPE
vehicle later in the first quarter.
Please call or email with any questions you may have. Thanks for your
assistance in these matters.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.